Starting Early: Education from Prekindergarten to Third Grade

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Starting Early: Education from Prekindergarten to Third Grade Starting Early: Education from Prekindergarten to Third Grade VOLUME 26 NUMBER 2 Fall 2016 3 Starting Early: Introducing the Issue 21 When Does Preschool Matter? 37 The Economic Returns to Early Childhood Education 57 Reading and Language in the Early Grades 75 Math, Science, and Technology in the Early Grades 95 Neuroscientific Insights: Attention, Working Memory, and Inhibitory Control 119 Quality in Early Education Classrooms: Definitions, Gaps, and Systems 139 The Early Care and Education Workforce 159 Supporting Young English Learners in the United States 185 Supporting Young Children with Disabilities 207 Parent Programs in Pre-K through Third Grade A COLLABORATION OF THE WOODROW WILSON SCHOOL OF PUBLIC AND INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AT PRINCETON UNIVERSITY AND THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION The Future of Children promotes effective policies and programs for children by providing timely, objective information based on the best available research. Senior Editorial Staff Journal Staff Sara McLanahan Kris McDonald Editor-in-Chief Associate Editor Princeton University Princeton University Director, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, and William S. Tod Jon Wallace Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs Managing Editor Princeton University Janet M. Currie Senior Editor Lisa Markman-Pithers Princeton University Outreach Director Director, Center for Health and Wellbeing; Princeton University Chair, Department of Economics; Associate Director, Education and Henry Putnam Professor of Economics Research Section and Public Affairs Allegra Pocinki Ron Haskins Outreach Coordinator Senior Editor Brookings Institution Brookings Institution Regina Leidy Senior Fellow, Cabot Family Chair, and Communications Coordinator Co-Director, Center on Children and Families Princeton University Cecilia Elena Rouse Tracy Merone Senior Editor Administrator Princeton University Princeton University Dean, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Katzman-Ernst Professor in the Economics of Education, and Professor of Economics and Public Affairs Isabel Sawhill Senior Editor Brookings Institution Senior Fellow The Future of Children would like to thank the Foundation for Child Development for its generous support. ISSN: 1054-8289 ISBN: 978-0-9857863-6-6 VOLUME 26 NUMBER 2 FALL 2016 Starting Early: Education from Prekindergarten to Third Grade 3 Starting Early: Introducing the Issue by Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Lisa Markman-Pithers, and Cecilia Elena Rouse 21 When Does Preschool Matter? by Hirokazu Yoshikawa, Christina Weiland, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn 37 The Economic Returns to Early Childhood Education by Lynn A. Karoly 57 Reading and Language in the Early Grades by Catherine E. Snow and Timothy J. Matthews 75 Math, Science, and Technology in the Early Grades by Douglas H. Clements and Julie Sarama 95 Neuroscientific Insights: Attention, Working Memory, and Inhibitory Control by C. Cybele Raver and Clancy Blair 119 Quality in Early Education Classrooms: Definitions, Gaps, and Systems by Robert Pianta, Jason Downer, and Bridget Hamre 139 The Early Care and Education Workforce by Deborah Phillips, Lea J. E. Austin, and Marcy Whitebook 159 Supporting Young English Learners in the United States by Lisa Barrow and Lisa Markman-Pithers 185 Supporting Young Children with Disabilities by Kathleen Hebbeler and Donna Spiker 207 Parent Programs in Pre-K through Third Grade by Katherine Magnuson and Holly S. Schindler www.futureofchildren.org Starting Early: Introducing the Issue Starting Early: Introducing the Issue Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Lisa Markman-Pithers, and Cecilia Elena Rouse cross the nation, more compelling evidence that exposing children and more people want to educational experiences when they’re to see children receive young can have profound effects on later quality education before educational, social, and adult outcomes. kindergarten. Public opinion In fact, as Lynn Karoly points out in this Apolls suggest that 70 percent of adults issue, estimates based on some older favor such programs, partly because of pre-K programs suggest that every dollar the irresistible idea that “starting early,” invested in prekindergarten pays off $3 to and ensuring that children arrive in school $17 in terms of benefits, both to the adult ready to learn, is the best way to generate individual and to society. That suggests happy, healthy, and productive adults.1 The prekindergarten is one of the most effective notion of starting early resonates. Head investments that we can make in children. Start, the federally funded prekindergarten Indeed, James Heckman of the University program for children from low-income of Chicago, a Nobel laureate in economics, homes, was a cornerstone of President has argued that investments made in early Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty. Even childhood are more beneficial and also then it was believed that students can’t more cost-effective than those made in fully benefit from an elementary education later childhood and adolescence.2 if they don’t arrive at kindergarten ready to learn. Presidents with views as disparate The idea that prekindergarten can enhance as those of George W. Bush and Barack later learning and adult success is based on Obama have called for strengthening early the premise that if pre-K programs provide childhood education in their budgets and enriching activities more intensively and State of the Union addresses. more intentionally than parents can, then those programs have the potential to boost One reason for the strong support of early children’s learning and skill acquisition. In childhood education is the seemingly brief, quality pre-K experiences can teach www.futureofchildren.org Jeanne Brooks-Gunn is the Virginia and Leonard Marx Professor of Child Development and Education at Teachers College and College of Physicians and Surgeons at Columbia University and co-director of the National Center for Children and Families. Lisa Markman- Pithers is the associate director of the Education Research Section at Princeton University, the outreach director for Future of Children, and a lecturer at Princeton’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. Cecilia Elena Rouse is the dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, the Katzman-Ernst Professor in the Economics of Education, and a professor of economics and public affairs at Princeton University. VOL. 26 / NO. 2 / FALL 2016 3 Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Lisa Markman-Pithers, and Cecilia Elena Rouse children the skills that make it easier composition, and programs’ quality and for them to learn new skills in early intensity. elementary school: that is, skills beget skills. Scholars have extensively studied the efficacy of pre-K programs, especially Differences in literacy and cognitive those offered to four-year-olds. Of skills between children in low-income more than 100 evaluations of pre-K families and their better-off counterparts programs, the vast majority used random are already apparent by age three, assignment of children to receive the or perhaps even earlier.3 The pre-K preschool treatment or not.5 Most of these education programs initiated in the 1960s experimental programs served children and 1970s were designed to reduce from low-resource families, in keeping those gaps by providing quality pre-K with the premise that these children were education to disadvantaged children, less likely to have the skills needed for who were less likely to be ready for kindergarten and were therefore most school. Few pre-K programs existed in likely to benefit. Consequently, we know the low-income neighborhoods where the most about how preschool influences most disadvantaged children lived, and children from disadvantaged backgrounds. parents with little income and education And because many of these evaluations were therefore less likely to send their were conducted before pre-K programs children to prekindergarten than were were widespread, children who didn’t parents with more resources. And when participate in a specific program (that disadvantaged parents were able to find is, those assigned to the control group) a pre-K program, it was likely to be of generally received no pre-K education at relatively low quality.4 all. Based on these observations, we would As theory predicted, these programs were expect that children from disadvantaged largely successful. They raised children’s environments would benefit the most academic achievement in the short term, from pre-K education; that high-quality and subjects who were followed into early programs would deliver the greatest adulthood showed higher educational benefits; and that children who received attainment, reduced crime, and more such education would benefit more than employment. More recent evaluations, those who remained at home, cared for by especially those involving universal pre-K parents, family, and friends. Comparisons programs rather than those targeting between different pre-K programs, on children from disadvantaged backgrounds, the other hand, shouldn’t show such also generally show short-term benefits a stark contrast. These assumptions overall. Evaluations that examined imply that not all programs would show children from different backgrounds equal benefits in empirical evaluations. have revealed stronger effects among Scholars have called this heterogeneity disadvantaged children, again in keeping in outcomes. Interpreting the research with theory. These evaluations are too requires attention to many factors— recent to have followed their children into
Recommended publications
  • Implementing Adult Learning Principles to Overcome Barriers of Learning in Continuing Higher Education Programs
    Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development Volume III, Issue 4 – Summer 2009 IMPLEMENTING ADULT LEARNING PRINCIPLES TO OVERCOME BARRIERS OF LEARNING IN CONTINUING HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS Kristen M. De Vito Eastern Illinois University 1 Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development Volume III, Issue 4 – Summer 2009 Abstract A fundamental aspect to continuing higher education is overcoming of barriers of learning when dealing with non-traditional students. With non-traditional student enrollment on the rise, continuing higher education programs have an obligation to address issues of accessibility, affordability and accountability in higher education. The purpose of the study was to identify the relationship between adult learning principles and overcoming barriers of adult learning in continuing higher education at higher education institutions based on published literature. 2 Online Journal of Workforce Education and Development Volume III, Issue 4 – Summer 2009 Introduction In ancient times, teachers like Socrates and Plato had theories about the ends of adult education but nothing about the means of adult learning. Yet because of their experiences with adults, they developed a very different concept of the teaching and learning process from what dominates formal education today (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 1998). The basic pattern of our educational system started to take shape between the American Revolution and the Civil War. Education was mostly viewed as a private responsibility. Over time the growth in manufacturing and urbanization, the rapid growth of cities, and the realization that the success of a democratic society depended on the intelligence of the population contributed to the shift in the responsibility of education from private to public (Knowles, 1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging the Private Sector to Improve Primary School Enrolment
    Leveraging the Private Sector to Improve Primary School Enrolment: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial in Pakistan 1 (November 2013) [PRELIMINARY AND INCOMPLETE — DO NOT DISTRIBUTE] Felipe Barrera-Osorio (Harvard, Graduate School of Education) David S. Blakeslee (Columbia University) Matthew Hoover (RAND) Leigh L. Linden (University of Texas at Austin, BREAD, J-PAL, IPA, IZA, NBER) Dhushyanth Raju (The World Bank) Stephen Ryan (University of Texas at Austin) Abstract: We evaluate the effects of publicly funded private primary schools on child enrollment in a sample of 199 villages in 10 underserved districts of rural Sindh province, Pakistan. The program is found to significantly increase child enrollment, which increases by 30 percentage points in treated villages. There is no overall differential effect of the intervention for boys and girls, due to similar enrollment rates in control villages. We find no evidence that providing greater financial incentives to entrepreneurs for the recruitment of girls leads to a greater increase in female enrollment than does an equal compensation scheme for boys and girls. Test scores improve dramatically in treatment villages, rising by 0.67 standard deviations relative to control villages. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1 We are deeply grateful to Mariam Adil and Aarij Bashir of The World Bank for their valuable insights in the design of the survey and their crucial support in its implementation. ! 1! I. Introduction The promotion of universal primary education is an important policy priority, as reflected in such initiatives as the Millennium Development Goals and the Education for All movement. Considerable progress has been made in recent years in raising primary education levels; nonetheless, low enrollment levels persist in regions such as Sub- Saharan Africa, West and Southwestern Asia, and South Asia (Hausmann et al., 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Day Kindergarten: a Missing Link in the Prekindergarten Through Third Grade (P-3) Continuum for Many Students
    BACKGROUNDER: Full-day Kindergarten: A Missing Link in the Prekindergarten through Third Grade (P-3) Continuum for Many Students ull-day kindergarten provides an essential bridge Too Few States Require Districts to Offer Fbetween prekindergarten (preK) and the primary Full-day Kindergarten grades. In kindergarten classrooms, students develop the academic, social, and emotional skills they need to ``Currently, only 11 states and the District of be successful later in school. These benefits seem to be Columbia require districts to offer at least five hours greater for children from disadvantaged backgrounds. of kindergarten per day.1 However, far too many children have no access to full- ``Forty-five states require that school districts provide day kindergarten, and not enough has been done in the at least half-day kindergarten. last decade to provide more children with access to this `` critical link between early childhood and K-12 education. There are five states that do not require districts to offer any type of kindergarten program, although many school districts offer half-day kindergarten Why is Full-day Kindergarten Important? at a minimum. ``Thirty-five states do not require children to attend In recent years, state and federal initiatives have greatly kindergarten. expanded access to prekindergarten programs for three- and four-year-old children. This expansion provides many more children with access to high-quality, full-day, The Amount of Instructional Time Students and often, full-year preK programs. Unfortunately, too Receive in Full-day Kindergarten Matters many children will follow full-day preK with half-day kindergarten which may jeopardize the important As in all grades, the amounts of instructional time academic and social gains made in preK.
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION in CHINA a Snapshot This Work Is Published Under the Responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD
    EDUCATION IN CHINA A Snapshot This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: Cover: © EQRoy / Shutterstock.com; © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © astudio / Shutterstock.com Inside: © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © li jianbing / Shutterstock.com; © tangxn / Shutterstock.com; © chuyuss / Shutterstock.com; © astudio / Shutterstock.com; © Frame China / Shutterstock.com © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. Education in China A SNAPSHOT Foreword In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education Reopening Guidance
    june 11, 2020 higher education reopening guidance Guidance overview This document provides guidance to Virginia institutions of higher education regarding their plans for offering in-person instruction and reopening their campuses in the 2020-21 academic year. The criteria outlined here, in consultation with the Virginia Department of Health, concern measures relating to COVID-19 that institutions should take for promoting and fostering the health and safety of students, faculty, staff, and surrounding communities as equitably as possible. Additionally, it recognizes the widely varied missions and circumstances of the many different colleges and universities, public and private, across the Commonwealth. Institutions are asked to prepare campus plans specific to their unique constituencies and settings, for timely submission to the Commonwealth. The Virginia Department of Health (VDH), the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV), and local health departments will serve as close partners to institutions throughout the duration of this pandemic, providing guidance, data, and assistance facilitating relationships with local health infrastructure as needed. section i: why safe and sustainable offering of in-person instruction and reopening of higher education are crucial for virginia Virginia’s colleges and universities are anchor institutions for the Commonwealth, and Virginia is widely regarded as having the best array of public and private institutions of higher education in America, as well as powerful workforce development and credentialing programs. COVID-19 has put at risk the more than $39.074 billion in annual economic impact higher education creates for the Commonwealth, and the 167,000 jobs tied directly or indirectly to Virginia colleges and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Childhood Education and Care in the United States: an Overview of the Current Policy Picture
    International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy Copyright 2007 by Korea Institute of Child Care and Education 2007, Vol. 1, No.1, 23-34 Early Childhood Education and Care in the United States: An Overview of the Current Policy Picture Sheila B. Kamerman Shirley Gatenio-Gabel Columbia University Fordham University USA USA Early childhood education and care (ECEC) in the US includes a wide range of part-day, full-school-day, and full- work-day programs, under educational, social welfare, and commercial auspices, funded and delivered in a variety of ways in both the public and the private sectors, designed sometimes with an emphasis on the “care” component of ECEC and at other times with stress on “education” or with equal attention to both. Although ECEC scholars and advocates are increasingly convinced of the need to integrate all these program types, categorical funding coupled with diverse societal values continue to support the differences. The result is a fragmented ECEC system, of wide- ranging quality and with skewed access, but with some movement in recent years toward the integration of early childhood education and care. Key Words : early education, child care, preschool 1Increased attention to early childhood education and in a variety of ways in both the public and the private care (ECEC) has been observed in all the industrialized sectors, designed sometimes with an emphasis on the countries but our focus here is on a current picture of “care” component of ECEC and at other times with ECEC in the United States (U.S.). stress on “education” or with equal attention to both.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Adult Learning Theory
    Designing Technology for Adult Learners: Applying Adult Learning Theory www.digitalpromise.orgAccelerating Change | 1 It’s a staggering statistic — 36 million adults in the United States read at a 3rd grade level or below.1 Of these, more than two-thirds are members of the workforce but don’t have the skills for advancement.2 Yet, finding and completing education programs is often a struggle for this population. Access to quality education programs is making powerful use of technology with these limited at best — our current adult education learners, including online courses for factory programs can only handle about four million workers in rural communities, cell phone of those 36 million learners.3 And, because based text and audio programs for English they often juggle multiple jobs and family language learners, and libraries providing duties, staying in and finishing a program is tablets for patrons to learn digital literacy skills. a challenge for most.4 Additionally, much of what these students are learning does not This is only the beginning. 36 million adults align with the skills they need for today’s means a potential market opportunity workforce.5 So, often students (who may estimated at three to six billion dollars.8 not be confident in their learning skills) As entrepreneurs and developers seek to struggle through courses that ultimately capitalize on this opportunity and provide don’t help them get to the next level. quality digital learning opportunities for underserved adult learners, it is important The use of technology to support learning for to consider ways to design products K-12 students is gaining popularity, leading that will best fit how adults learn.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Data Terms
    Glossary of Terms The Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board has produced this Glossary of commonly used Texas higher education terms. By its nature, the Glossary will be an evolving document. If you have suggestions for clear wording for terms in the Glossary or for terms whose definition you would like to have included, please send your suggestions to Torca Bunton at [email protected] at the Coordinating Board. TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD Educational Data Center Glossary of Terms August 14, 2017 AAT Associate of Arts in a Teaching degree. Board-approved collegiate degree programs consisting of lower-division courses intended for transfer to baccalaureate programs that lead to initial Texas teacher certification. (CTC CBM009) Academic Course Guide Manual (ACGM) The official list of approval numbers for general academic transfer courses that may be offered for state funding by public community and technical colleges in Texas. It lists a basic core of general academic courses which are freely transferable among all public institutions of higher education in Texas in accordance with the Texas Education Code, §61.051(g). TCCNS numbers are assigned to most courses in the manual. Academic courses reported on the CTC CBM004 must appear either on this list of approved courses or in the Special Approval/Unique Need Inventory. See Lower Division Academic Course Guide Manual. (CTC CBM004) Academic Credit Course A college-level course that, if successfully completed, can be applied toward the number of courses required for achieving a degree, diploma, certificate, or other formal award. Academic Program Instructional program leading toward an associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, doctor’s, or first-professional degree or resulting in credits that can be applied to one of these degrees.
    [Show full text]
  • Initiatives from Preschool to Third Grade a POLICYMAKER's GUIDE
    FEB 2018 Initiatives From Preschool to Third Grade A POLICYMAKER'S GUIDE BRUCE ATCHISON LOUISA DIFFEY SPECIAL REPORT www.ecs.org | @EdCommission 2 he period between preschool and third grade is a tipping point in a Tchild’s journey toward lifelong learning — from “learning to read” Of the 2.5 million to “reading to learn.”1 If children do not have proficient reading skills by third grade, their ability to progress through school and meet grade-level students who dropped expectations diminishes significantly. While all areas of children’s learning and development are critical for school success, the predictive power of out of high school last a child’s third-grade reading proficiency on high school graduation and year, about 1.6 million dropout rates is startling.2 Consider: were firmly set on that J Children who are not reading proficiently by third grade are four times less likely to graduate from high school on time. trajectory when they were 8 years old. J If they live in poverty, they are 13 times less likely to graduate on time. J In 2016, they comprised more than half of all students (63 percent) who did not graduate on time. Pair that with the knowledge that about 30 percent of all fourth-graders and 50 percent of African-American and Hispanic fourth-graders nationwide are In 2016-17, 30 states reading below grade-level. Over half are likely to drop out or will not graduate on time. increased funding for If policymakers are to make a significant impact on the readiness of our pre-K, demonstrating nation’s future workforce, interventions and strategies to address gaps in overall support for learning must begin much earlier than third grade.
    [Show full text]
  • Stats in Brief: Instructional Time for Third- and Eighth-Graders in Public and Private Schools
    The amount of time students spend in learning environments, as well STATS IN BRIEF as the amount of time that students U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION FEBRUARY 2017 NCES 2017–076 are exposed to instruction in particular subjects, have been topics of debate and concern in education policy and practitioner circles (McMurrer 2008; Instructional Time National Academy of Education 2009). Indeed, an early but foundational review of literature on instructional time highlighted for Third- and its importance for student learning (Berliner 1990). Differences in the use of time, however, make instructional time Eighth-Graders difficult to study. For instance, allocated time—or the time that schools or teachers schedule for instruction in particular in Public and subjects—is distinct from the time that students spend actively engaged with and learning from instructional materials Private Schools: (Berliner 1990). Despite the difficulties in studying instructional time in its varied forms, researchers have agreed that it is School Year 2011–12 important to study the amount of time that students in different grades have been AUTHORS PROJECT OFFICER exposed to particular subjects (Coates Kathleen Mulvaney Hoyer John Ralph Dinah Sparks National Center for Education Statistics 2003; Lanahan, Princiotta, and Enyeart Activate Research, Inc. 2006; Long 2014; Morton and Dalton 2007; Perie, Baker, and Bobbitt 1997). Statistics in Brief publications present descriptive data in tabular formats to provide useful information to a broad audience, including members of the general public. They address topical issues and questions. They do not investigate more complex hypotheses, account for inter-relationships among variables, or support causal inferences. We This publication was prepared for NCES encourage readers who are interested in more complex questions and in- under Contract No.
    [Show full text]
  • Undergraduate Research and Higher Education of the Future
    uarterlyCOUNCIL ON UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH Summer 2017 Issue | Volume 37, Number 4 UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH AND HIGHER EDUCATION OF THE FUTURE Also in this issue: Some Pathologies of Undergraduate Research — and How to Cure Them www.cur.org The Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly is published uarterly in the Fall, Winter, Spring, and COUNCIL ON UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH Summer by the Council on Summer 2017 Volume 37, Number 4 Undergraduate Research. Editor-in-Chief Engineering The mission of the Council on James T. LaPlant, College of Arts and Sciences Binod Tiwari, Civil and Environmental Undergraduate Research is to support Valdosta State University Engineering Department and promote high-quality undergraduate [email protected] California State University, Fullerton student-faculty collaborative research and [email protected] Issue Editors scholarship. Janice DeCosmo, Associate Dean Geosciences The Council on Undergraduate Research Undergraduate Academic Affairs Laura A. Guertin, Department of Earth Science Quarterly publishes scholarly work that exam- University of Washington Penn State-Brandywine ines effective practices and novel approaches, [email protected] [email protected] explores pedagogical models, and highlights Laurie Gould, Department of Criminal Justice and Health Sciences the results of assessment of undergraduate Criminology Niharika Nath, Life Sciences Department research. As a peer-reviewed publication of Georgia Southern University New York Institute of Technology- the Council on Undergraduate Research, the [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Risks and Responses for Higher Education Institutions in Transition
    Identifying Risks and Responses for Higher Education Institutions in Transition Identifying Risks and Responses for Higher Education Institutions in Transition Strategic Changes for the Future On top of these financial pressures, demographics have changed; the number of potential traditional-age students has actually decreased. Higher Education institutions are facing the pressure of finding their The bottom line as fewer potential students with less ability to pay way in a changing market. The question is no longer, “Should we means that price sensitivity is greater than ever. And that means adapt?” but is now, “What is the best way to adapt?” For many, the institutions must compete more fiercely. most important first step in adapting is to understand institutional risks These trends have led many colleges and universities to revisit their and to develop strategies to combat those risks. strategic plans and to question if they are effectively allocating their Following the onset of the Great Recession in 2008, 30 percent of limited resources to the most important areas. As part of these efforts, institutions did just that, adopting some form of short-term institutional leaders now must focus on: cost-reduction (i.e. hiring freezes, salary freezes, and downsizing). – Changing the nature of decision making It became clear that those efforts would not suffice. Comprehensive, – Developing deeper understanding of their markets systemic approaches were needed to keep institutions viable. Those approaches require that institutional leaders evaluate risk factors, – Embracing the concept of “academic auxiliaries” including institution size, operational expenses, tuition discounting, – Relentlessly pursuing an efficient bureaucracy and tuition dependence to project whether or not their institutions are sustainable.
    [Show full text]