DOCSLIB.ORG

GUIDELINE for WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT on RECLAIMED OIL SANDS LEASES Revised (2007) Edition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GUIDELINE for WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT on RECLAIMED OIL SANDS LEASES Revised (2007) Edition GUIDELINE FOR WETLAND ESTABLISHMENT ON RECLAIMED OIL SANDS LEASES Revised (2007) Edition Recommended by the Wetlands and Aquatics Subgroup, Reclamation Working Group, Cumulative Environmental Management Association – Wood Buffalo Region December 2007 Second Edition (Dec 2007) ISBN: 978-0-7785-7697-6 Website: www.environment.alberta.ca Disclaimer: Any mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement or recommendation for use. Any comments, questions or suggestions on the content of this document may be directed to: Regional Services, Northern Region Alberta Environment #111 Twin Atria Building 4999 – 98 Avenue Edmonton, Alberta T6B 2X3 Fax: (780) 427-7824 Additional print copies of this document are available from: Information Centre Alberta Environment Main Floor, Oxbridge Place 9820 – 106 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2J6 Tel: (780) 427-2700 Fax: (780) 422-4086 Outside of Edmonton dial 310-0000 for toll-free connection Email: [email protected] Copyright of this publication, regardless of format, belongs to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Alberta. Reproduction of this publication, in whole or in part, regardless of purpose, requires the prior written permission of Alberta Environment. © Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Alberta, 2008. This document should be cited as: Alberta Environment. 2008. Guideline for wetland establishment on reclaimed oil sands leases (2nd edition). Prepared by Harris, M.L. of Lorax Environmental for the Wetlands and Aquatics Subgroup of the Reclamation Working Group of the Cumulative Environmental Management Association, Fort McMurray, AB. December 2007. ii Second Edition (Dec 2007) CEMA Reclamation Working Group Wetlands and Aquatics Subgroup Mission Statement Support the creation of a range of sustainable wetlands for oil sand reclamation and restoration of disturbed wetlands in the Athabasca oil sands region, by advancing the development of guidelines Vision Design criteria and performance measurements for created wetlands that are accepted by industry, regulators and stakeholders Title Page Photographs: Right photo: Tower Road natural wetland, Fort McMurray, AB. Courtesy of Kristina Norstrom (Albian Sands) 2005. Left photo: Peat Pond, Syncrude Mildred Lake lease (on saline, sodic overburden landform) – the first reclaimed wetland to use the Guidelines for Wetland Establishment on Reclaimed Oil Sands Leases (2000 [first] edition) during the planning and design phases of construction. Courtesy of Clara Qualizza (Syncrude Canada) 2006. iii Second Edition (Dec 2007) Executive Summary Executive Summary This second edition of the wetlands guideline is an update of the state of knowledge regarding reclamation of wetlands in the oil sands region. It describes an integrated approach to the planning, design, construction, monitoring and adaptive management of reclaimed wetlands. The approach adopted by this guideline is founded on five basic principles: • recognition of the critical function of wetlands in distributing and retaining water on the reclaimed landscape; • recognition of the complex interaction of climate, hydrology, geology, ecology and time on wetlands creation and evolution in the oil sands region; • recognition of the need for inter-disciplinary collaboration and coordination when working toward wetlands reclamation; • recognition that good will, compromise and communication among stakeholders will be invaluable in the pursuit of a complex and dynamic result – healthy, functioning reclaimed wetlands that approximate natural systems as best as current knowledge and capabilities allow; • recognition that best practices will evolve with continued research, monitoring, and adaptive management. Although this edition focuses on reclamation on surface-mined oil sands leases, there is also information provided regarding restoration of altered wetlands on or adjacent to surface-mined leases or on in-situ mine sites. Wetland reclamation is defined as the creation of wetlands on disturbed land where they did not formerly exist or where their previous form has been entirely lost. Wetland restoration is a process of returning wetland function of a remnant wetland site, as it was before disturbance. Wetland reclamation and restoration knowledge from other regions of North America and the world may be used to assist planning teams in the oil sands, but those experiences must be adapted and/or assessed for their applicability to the natural, traditional, industrial and regulatory environments of north-eastern Alberta. Section 3.0 provides these ecological, historical and regulatory contexts to the guidance in the remainder of the document. Wetlands cover approximately half of the natural landscape in the oil sands region, and are, thus, a major component of the undisturbed boreal ecosystem. Wetlands are areas where the land is saturated with water for long enough periods to support wet-adapted processes and plants. They are shallow (≤2 m) with stagnant or slowly moving water. Wetland classes encountered in the oil sands region are bogs, fens, marshes, shallow open water wetlands and swamps. This guideline discusses riparian margins or fully aquatic systems (lakes and streams) only in relation to their interaction with wetlands on the whole reclaimed landscape. Natural boreal wetlands are a critical habitat for many important wildlife species, including woodland caribou, moose, muskrat, beaver, waterfowl (particularly diving ducks) and amphibians. They are linked to the traditional way of life of local Aboriginal people, because of the economic importance of fur-trading and the cultural significance of many wildlife species (moose, muskrat, beaver) and wetland plants (Sphagnum moss, rat root, bog cranberry). Aboriginal knowledge and interpretations of wetland systems are based on long term empirical evidence and have much to contribute to western scientific research findings. 1 Second Edition (Dec 2007) Executive Summary The surface mining of oil sands in north-eastern Alberta produces several landforms and materials that are relevant to wetlands reclamation: • mining excavations produce end-pits, a wide range of gradients and overburden piles; • extraction of bitumen from oil sands produces process-affected tailings containing water, sand, silts, clays, soluble organic chemicals (such as naphthenic acids and hydrocarbons), ammonia, heavy metals and salts; • process-affected materials that cannot be recycled are stored in settling basins (up to tens of square kilometres in surface area), where subsequent settlement and redistribution produces sand edges, mature fine tailings and process-affected water; • upgrading of bitumen to crude oil produces by-products like sulphur and coke that are stockpiled in a retrievable manner; • the mining and extraction processes increase the volume of materials (natural soils and separated soil components like overburden and tailings) by 20-25 % over the initial pre- disturbance volume. These changes fundamentally alter the topography, geochemistry and hydrology of the land. Reclamation must incorporate or accommodate these post-mining elements. The reclamation of these disturbed areas to wetlands requires an awareness of the regulatory and planning policies of the region. These include legislated obligations (Alberta Water Act, Alberta Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act [EPEA]), management strategies (‘Water for Life’), regional planning (Regional Sustainable Development Strategy, Fort McMurray regional management plan), and multi-stakeholder strategic planning (the mandate of the Reclamation Working Group of CEMA). A fundamental component of the EPEA is the reclamation objective of returning disturbed landscapes to ‘equivalent land capability’, which is defined as the ability of the land to support various land uses after reclamation that are similar but not necessarily identical to those that existed before mining. Wetlands will play an important functional role in meeting these regulatory requirements of reclaimed landscapes. Reclamation efforts in the oil sands are large-scale, involving whole landscapes or watersheds; thus wetlands created in this context are fundamentally different from many of the wetland projects documented in the published literature. In this guideline, the planning and design of wetlands has been divided into landscape-scale and wetland-scale components. This recognizes that landscape-scale elements and design of uplands reclamation will largely determine what can be achieved at the level of the individual wetland. Guidance on wetlands planning at these two spatial scales is provided in section 4.0. Landscape-scale planning must involve decision sequences that incorporate: the uses and functions required in the reclaimed wetland, wetland placement relative to other landforms, and aerial extent of wetlands in the closure landscape. Guiding recommendations that relate to this level of planning are provided in section 4.1. 2 Second Edition (Dec 2007) Executive Summary Wetlands provide several important uses and functions: • water storage • groundwater recharge • flood control (by detention or depression storage) • storm runoff generation • microclimate regulation • shoreline stabilization • water treatment • carbon storage • Aboriginal cultural use • trapping of fur-bearers • fishing and waterfowl hunting • recreation • wildlife habitat (wetland indicator species are moose, woodland caribou, muskrat, beaver, Canadian toad and ducks). The key limiting landscape-scale
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands: an Overview of Issues
    Order Code RL33483 Wetlands: An Overview of Issues Updated November 25, 2008 Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Wetlands: An Overview of Issues Summary The 110th Congress, like earlier ones, considered numerous policy topics that involve wetlands. A few of the topics were new to this Congress, such as wetlands provisions in the 2008 farm bill (P.L. 110-246), while most were examined but not resolved in earlier Congresses, such as applying federal regulations on private lands, wetland loss rates, and restoration and creation accomplishments. The 110th Congress also considered wetland topics at the program level, responding to legal decisions and administrative actions affecting the jurisdictional boundary limits of the federal wetland permit program in the Clean Water Act (CWA). Perhaps the issue receiving the greatest attention was determining which wetlands should be included and excluded from permit requirements under the CWA’s regulatory program, as a result of Supreme Court rulings in 2001 (in the SWANCC case) that narrowed federal regulatory jurisdiction over certain isolated wetlands, and in June 2006 (in the Rapanos-Carabell decision) that left the jurisdictional reach of the permit program to be determined on a case-by-case basis. In the 110th Congress, House and Senate committees held hearings on legislation intended to reverse the Court’s rulings (H.R. 2421, S. 1870). Wetland protection efforts continue to engender intense controversy over issues of science and policy. Controversial topics include the rate and pattern of loss, whether all wetlands should be protected in a single fashion, the effectiveness of the current suite of laws in protecting them, and the fact that 75% of remaining U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Outcomes of Wetland Restoration, Enhancement, and Creation in Idaho—Assessing Potential Functions, Values, and Condition
    Measuring outcomes of wetland restoration, enhancement, and creation in Idaho—Assessing potential functions, values, and condition in a watershed context Wildlife Bureau, Habitat Section Idaho Department of Fish and Game PO Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Franklin Wetland Mitigation (left); Jewel Wetland (right) Chris Murphy Tim Weekley EPA Wetland Program 2012 Development Grant # CD – 00J006-01 ABSTRACT A wetland restoration monitoring and assessment program framework was developed for Idaho. The project goal was to assess outcomes of substantial governmental and private investment in wetland restoration, enhancement and creation. The functions, values, condition, and vegetation at restored, enhanced, and created wetlands on private and state lands across Idaho were retrospectively evaluated. Assessment was conducted at multiple spatial scales and intensities. Potential functions and values (ecosystem services) were rapidly assessed using the Oregon Rapid Wetland Assessment Protocol. Vegetation samples were analyzed using Floristic Quality Assessment indices from Washington State. We compared vegetation of restored, enhanced, and created wetlands with reference wetlands that occurred in similar hydrogeomorphic environments determined at the HUC 12 level. HUC 12s were classified using cluster analysis according to spatially derived hydrologic, geologic, soils, and climate data into watershed ecological groups. A primary outcome of this project was that stakeholders are better informed about how restoration benefits watershed processes, functions,
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Carbon Protocol Development
    Soil Carbon Protocols Public Scoping Meeting March 6, 2013 Sacramento, CA Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Overview of the Climate Action Reserve 3. Protocol development process 4. Soil carbon scoping a) Grasslands b) Peatlands 5. Feedback & discussion 2 Introductions . Climate Action Reserve − Max DuBuisson, Senior Policy Manager − Teresa Lang, Policy Manager − Sami Osman, Policy Manager . Attendees 3 CLIMATE ACTION RESERVE OVERVIEW 4 What We Do . Mission: to promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions by pioneering credible market-based policies and solutions . Development of high-quality, stakeholder-driven, standardized project protocols . Accredited offset project registry under the California cap- and-trade program . Serve compliance and voluntary carbon markets . Reputation for integrity and experience in providing best-in- class registry services for offset markets 5 Separation of Roles . Independent from the State of California . Reserve does not fund or develop projects . Does not take ownership of offsets . Is not an exchange . Is a 501(c)3 not-for-profit organization . Independent from third-party verification – Consistent with international standards – ANSI accreditation, training by Reserve or ARB 6 Serving Multiple Markets . Compliance market: – Compliance buyers under California’s cap-and-trade – Western Climate Initiative – CEQA compliance . Voluntary market: – Voluntary corporate buyers – LEED certification (USGBC) – Retail and individual buyers 7 CA Compliance Offsets . Early action: projects use Reserve protocols, and then move to compliance program through a desk verification . Compliance offsets: credits issued against compliance protocols . 4 Reserve protocols adopted for early action and adapted for compliance use – Forest, Urban Forest, Livestock, Ozone Depleting Substances . Additional protocols will be developed by ARB staff, building upon existing methodologies – Strong interest in agricultural protocols – Next up: Rice Cultivation, Coal Mine Methane – workshop in Sacramento March 28 8 Compliance Offset Market .
    [Show full text]
  • Nature of Ergastic Substances in Some Poaceae Seeds
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 10(48), pp. 9800-9803, 29 August, 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB ISSN 1684–5315 © 2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Nature of ergastic substances in some Poaceae seeds Idu, M. 1* and Onyibe, H. I. 2 1Department of Botany, University of Benin, PMB 1154, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria. 2Department of Botany, Ambrose Alli University, PMB. 14, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. Accepted 6 May, 2011 Seeds of 48 species of Poaceae were examined for the presence of alkaloid, protein, fats and oil, inulin, starch and tannins. All taxa investigated indicated the presence of starch, fats and oils and protein and were devoid of tannins and inulin. Only 12 seed samples indicated the presence of alkaloids. The Positively indicated taxa are suggested for further investigation. Key words: Poaceae, starch, fats and oils, alkaloid, protein, tannins, inulin. INTRODUCTION Ergastic substances are products of metabolism. These reserve (Abelson, 1978). substances may appear or disappear at different times in From the beginning, seeds have been and still are the the life of the cell. They are reserve or waste products main source of man’s diet. The Poaceae (large seeded resulting from cellular activities. Some well-known grasses) contribute more food seeds than any other plant ergastic substances are carbohydrates, cellulose and family; it contributes about 50% per capita energy intake starch, protein bodies, fats and related substances (FAD, 1977). (Eckey, 1954; Pritchard, 1997; Arahira et al., 1998; The importance of the nature of ergastic substances in Christina et al., 2001; Gómez-Sosa and Castro, 2004; plant taxonomy has been stressed by various authors Wolf, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX B - Regulatory and Non-Regulatory Programs That Contain Bmps Applicable to Protecting and Restoring Waters Within the Basin
    Basin 11 Management Plan ANR June 2008 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A................................................................................................................................2 APPENDIX A.1 - Statutory Index.............................................................................................. 2 APPENDIX A.2 - Basin 11 Council Members and Technical Advisors.................................... 5 APPENDIX A.3 - Basin 11 Planning Partners ......................................................................... 10 APPENDIX A.4 - Public Meeting Held in Basin 11................................................................ 11 APPENDIX A.5 - Municipal Meetings Regarding Surface Water Classification and Typing 19 APPENDIX A.6 - Functions and Values of Selected Wetlands............................................... 20 APPENDIX A.7 - Summary of Physical, Chemical, and Biological Assessments of Basin 11 Completed or Underway................................................................................................... 23 APPENDIX A.8 - Threatened and Endangered Species in Basin 11 ....................................... 26 APPENDIX A.9 - Dams ........................................................................................................... 32 APPENDIX A.10 - Agriculture in Basin 11............................................................................. 35 APPENDIX A.11 - Maps of Basin 11 with Proposed Typing and Classification.................... 49 APPENDIX A.12 - Description of Proposed Water Management
    [Show full text]
  • CURRENT RESEARCH C Resources Natural Anada Geological Surveyofcanada C Naturelles Ressources Anada
    Geological Survey of Canada CURRENT RESEARCH 2006-G Geological Survey of Canada Radiocarbon Dates XXXV Collated by R. McNeely 2006 CURRENT RESEARCH Natural Resources Ressources naturelles Canada Canada ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2006 ISSN 1701-4387 Catalogue No. M44-2006/G0E-PDF ISBN 0-662-43811-6 A copy of this publication is also available for reference by depository libraries across Canada through access to the Depository Services Program's Web site at http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca A free digital download of this publication is available from GeoPub: http://geopub.nrcan.gc.ca/index_e.php Toll-free (Canada and U.S.A.): 1-888-252-4301 Critical reviewers L. Dredge Author’s address R. McNeely Geological Survey of Canada Terrain Sciences Division 601 Booth Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8 Publication approved by GSC Northern Canada Original manuscript submitted: 2005-12-15 Final version approved for publication: 2006-01-10 Correction date: All requests for permission to reproduce this work, in whole or in part, for purposes of commercial use, resale, or redistribution shall be addressed to: Earth Sciences Sector Information Division, Room 402, 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8. This date list, GSC XXXV, is the twenty-fourth to be published directly by the Geological Survey of Canada. Lists prior to GSC XII were published first in the journal Radiocarbon and were reprinted as GSC Papers. The lists through 1967 (GSC VI) were given new pagination, whereas lists VII to XI (1968 to 1971) were reprinted with the same pagination. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 Acknowledgments .
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Protection Assessment of Different Inland Wetlands in Chile Patricia Möller1,2* and Andrés Muñoz-Pedreros3
    Möller and Muñoz-Pedreros Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 2014, 87:23 http://www.revchilhistnat.com/content/87/1/23 RESEARCH Open Access Legal protection assessment of different inland wetlands in Chile Patricia Möller1,2* and Andrés Muñoz-Pedreros3 Abstract Background: Inland wetlands are well represented ecosystems in Chile that are subjected to various pressures affecting conservation. Protection means legal and administrative initiatives which promote the protection and/or preservation of a wetland, either in its entirety, considering their areas of influence or its components. Results: The aim of this work is to develop a methodology for estimating the value of protection of different types of inland wetlands in Chile. For this purpose: a) the Chilean regulations in relation to the issues of biodiversity, wetlands and water resources were compiled; (b) such legislation and its application were analyzed, (c) protection and restriction values of each legal standard was estimated, and then total protection value of standards applied to six types of wetlands in study. 47 legal rules related to protection of inland wetlands and eight directly or indirectly affecting conservation and wise use of wetlands were identified. Conclusions: In Chile there is no specific statutory rules or regulations on wetlands. Current legal standards do not protect equally the different types of inland wetlands, being swamp forests, peatlands and brackish Andean lakes less protected. To improve wetlands conservation, incentives promoting wetlands destruction must be eliminated and promulgate specific regulations for proper management and conservation. Keywords: Inland wetlands; Legal standards; Real protection; Wetland protection Background Wetlands support high biodiversity and are presently Chile is highly diverse in limnic systems mostly recog- recognized as the most threatened systems by human nized as wetlands and defined as ‘areas of marsh, fen, activities (Marín et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This Is a Consolidated List Of
    RWKiger 26 Jul 18 Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 24 and 25. In citations of articles, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbreviated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix "a"; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with "b". Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes. Aares, E., M. Nurminiemi, and C. Brochmann. 2000. Incongruent phylogeographies in spite of similar morphology, ecology, and distribution: Phippsia algida and P. concinna (Poaceae) in the North Atlantic region. Pl. Syst. Evol. 220: 241–261. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturf. Ges. = Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen naturforschenden Gesellschaft. Acta Biol. Cracov., Ser. Bot. = Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Botanica. Acta Horti Bot. Prag. = Acta Horti Botanici Pragensis. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. = Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. [Shokubutsu Bunrui Chiri.] Acta Phytotax.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Bocconea 25, Results of the Seventh Iter Mediterraneum
    Bocconea 25: 5-127 doi: 10.7320/Bocc25.005 Version of Record published online on 9 July 2012 Werner Greuter Results of the Seventh “Iter Mediterraneum” in the Peloponnese, Greece, May to June 1995 (Occasional Papers from the Herbarium Greuter – N° 1) Abstract Greuter, W.: Results of the Seventh “Iter Mediterraneum” in the Peloponnese, Greece, May to June 1995. (Occasional Papers from the Herbarium Greuter – N° 1). — Bocconea. 25: 5-127. 2012. — ISSN 1120-4060 (print), 2280-3882 (online). The material collected during OPTIMA’s Iter Mediterraneum VII to the Peloponnese in 1995 has been revised. It comprises 2708 gatherings, each with 0 to 31 duplicates, collected in 53 numbered localities. The number of taxa (species or subspecies) represented is 1078. As many of the areas visited had been poorly explored before, a dozen of the taxa collected turned out to not to have been previously described, of which 9 (7 species, 2 subspecies) are described and named here (three more were published independently in the intervening years). They belong to the genera Allium, Asperula, Ballota, Klasea, Lolium, Minuartia, Nepeta, Oenanthe, and Trifolium. New combinations at the rank of subspecies (3) and variety (2) are also published. One of the species (Euphorbia aulacosperma) is first recorded for Europe, and several are new for the Peloponnese or had their known range of distribution significantly expanded. Critical notes draw attention to these cases and to taxonomic problems yet to be solved. An overview of the 11 Itinera Mediterranea that have taken place so far is presented, summarising their main results. Keywords: Flora of Greece, Peloponnese, Itinera Mediterranea, OPTIMA, new species, new com- binations, Allium, Asperula, Ballota, Klasea, Lolium, Minuartia, Nepeta, Oenanthe, Trifolium.
    [Show full text]
  • Beckmannia Eruciformis (L.) Host in Slovakia – Distribution, Ecology and Coenotic Affinity Dedicated to the Memory of Ján Bogoly (1951 – 2011)
    HACQUETIA 10/2 • 2011, 171–181 DOI: 10.2478/v10028-011-0009-3 Beckmannia eruciformis (L.) Host In SlovAKIA – dIstrIbutIon, ecoLogy And coenotIc AffInIty Dedicated to the memory of Ján Bogoly (1951 – 2011) Daniel DÍTĚ1, Pavol ELIÁŠ jun.2, Richard HRIVNÁK1 & Zuzana MELEČKOVÁ1 Abstract The historical and recent distribution, ecology and phytosociology of perennial grass Beckmannia eruciformis was studied in Slovakia between 2002 and 2010. Altogether 22 natural and two secondary sites with presence of the species were found from published sources, herbaria and field research. Localities of its native occur- rence have been concentrated in Eastern Slovakia (Východoslovenská nížina Lowland from the settlement of Streda nad Bodrogom to the villages of Pribeník and Biel). Secondary sites were found in Western Slovakia (Podunajská nížina Lowland; the surroundings of Sládkovičovo town and Jaslovské Bohunice village). The relatively massive reduction of Beckmannia eruciformis localities was recorded in the seventies and eighties of the last century; it was related to massive land reclamation and alterations in the water regime of river alluvia. Recently only seven localities were found. Permanent occurrence was confirmed only in two localities (Malý Horeš, Strážne). In those cases Beckmannia eruciformis has created relatively large populations including some thousands of individuals. All other recent occurrences were temporary (Streda nad Bodrogom, Keresztúr farmstead, Horešské lúky Nature Reserve, Veľký Horeš, Pribeník). Moreover, they were relatively poor in the number in individuals and are acutely threatened by anthropogenic changes of environmental condi- tions. According to our results and by applying the IUCN criteria, we propose to modify the threat category of the species from critically endangered (CR) to endangered (EN) in Slovakia.
    [Show full text]