Methodist History, 54:4 (July 2016)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Stephen J. Wellum 3 the Life and Legacy of George Whitefield (1714-1770)
Volume 18 · Number 2 Summer 2014 George Whitefield Editorial: Stephen J. Wellum 3 The Life and Legacy of George Whitefield (1714-1770) Michael A. G. Haykin 7 The Christian Life in the Thought of George Whitefield Digby L. James 23 Who is the Greatest Preacher? The Life and Legacy of George Whitefield Jeongmo Yoo 43 George Whitefield’s Doctrine of Christ Lee Gatiss 71 George Whitefield — The Angelican Evangelist Introduced and Edited by Michael A. G. Haykin 83 Writing to George Whitefield: A letter from Anne Dutton on Sinless Perfection Introduced and Edited by Michael A. G. Haykin 89 George Whitefield Sermon: “The Indwelling of the Spirit the Common Privilege of all Believers” Introduced and Edited by Michael A. G. Haykin 103 George Whitefield Sermon: “Christ, the Believer’s Wisdom, Righteousness, Satification and Redemption” The SBJT Forum 119 Book Reviews 131 Editor-in-Chief: R. Albert Mohler, Jr. • Editor: Stephen J. Wellum • Associate Editor: Brian Vickers • Book Review Editor: Gregory A. Wills • Assistant Editor: Brent E. Parker • Editorial Board: Ran- dy L. Stinson, Daniel S. Dumas, Gregory A. Wills, Adam W. Greenway, Dan DeWitt, Timothy Paul Jones, Jeff K. Walters, Steve Watters, James A. Smith, Sr.•Typographer: Brittany Loop•Editorial Office: SBTS Box 832, 2825 Lexington Rd., Louisville, KY 40280, (800) 626-5525, x 4413 • Editorial E-Mail: [email protected] Editorial: The Life and Legacy of George Whitefield (1714- 1770) Stephen J. Wellum Stephen J. Wellum is Professor of Christian Theology at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and editor ofSouthern Baptist Journal of Theology. He received his Ph.D. -
The Evangelistic Piety of George Whitefield
ON THE ERRANDS OF ANGELS SENT: THE EVANGELISTIC PIETY OF GEORGE WHITEFIELD __________________ A Paper Presented to Dr. Michael Haykin The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary __________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for 88910 __________________ by Matthew D. Haste 1010 Morehead Road, Bowling Green, KY 42101 May 23, 2011 ON THE ERRANDS OF ANGELS SENT: THE EVANGELISTIC PIETY OF GEORGE WHITEFIELD In his 19th-century poetic tribute entitled ―The Preacher,‖ John Greenleaf Whittier called George Whitefield ―a homeless pilgrim with dubious name / blown about by the winds of fame.‖1 This fame on both sides of the Atlantic provided Whitefield with a unique platform for preaching the Gospel in his day. He seemingly seized every opportunity, preaching over 18,000 sermons over the course of his life while traveling frequently between England, America, and Scotland. Whittier‘s poem, while recognizing that Whitefield was not without his faults, summarizes his ministry well with these words: ―Up and down the world he went / A John the Baptist crying, Repent!‖2 Beneath Whitefield‘s fiery passion and inexhaustible energy for the Great Commission was an evangelistic piety built upon Calvinistic theology and evangelical convictions about the nature of God and man. This paper will examine Whitefield‘s piety as it relates to his zeal for evangelism through the lens of his life and theology. The goal is to provide an evaluative summary of the spirituality of a man who lived, in Whittier‘s words, as if he were ―on the errands of angels sent.‖3 The Life of George Whitefield On December 16, 1714, the owners of the finest hotel in Gloucester welcomed their seventh child into the world. -
An Introduction to the Lumber River Conference
WOULD YOU BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE A PART OF HISTORY DATING BACK TO THE EARLY 1700’S? WHY DO WE HAVE A BISHOP? WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF A CLASS LEADER? WHAT DOES JOHN WESLEY, H. H. LOWERY AND ISAIAH LOCKLEAR HAVE IN COMMON? HOW DID THE LUMBER RIVER CONFERENCE GET HERE? WANT TO KNOW MORE FEEL FREE TO ATTEND THE FOLLOWING COURSE BEING PROVIDED BY: New Bethel Holiness Methodist Church The Lumber River Conference of the Holiness Methodist Church: An Intro Guidelines for Church Membership CLASSES WILL BEGIN FEBRUARY 6TH, 2011 AT 6:00 PM AT NEW BETHEL HOLINESS METHODIST CHURCH EVERYONE IS INVITED TO ATTEND. Dwayne Lowry 2 An Introduction to the Lumber River Conference I. An Introduction to the Lumber River Conference of the Holiness Methodist Church A. History B. Doctrine II. Church History and Development A. Christianity 1. Three histories 2. Three Distinct Theologies B. Catholicism East-West 1. Roman Catholicism (Latin Speaking) a) the largest single Christian body b) composed of those Christians who acknowledge the supreme authority of the bishop of Rome, the pope, in matters of faith. c) The word catholic (Greek katholikos) means “universal” and has been used to designate the church since its earliest period, when it was the only Christian church. 2. Greek Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox (Greek Speaking) a) Constantine/Constantinople (330 A.D.) b) First Christian Emperor of Roman Empire c) Survived the breakup of the Roman empire in the 5th century 3. Protestant Reformation a) Huldreich Zwingli or Ulrich (1484-1531) 12/15/2010Dwayne Lowry | Confidential Dwayne Lowry 3 An Introduction to the Lumber River Conference (1) Swiss theologian, leader of the Reformation in Switzerland. -
Kenneth J. Collins, Ph.D. 1 Updated February 16, 2009 Primary Sources: Books Published Albin, Thomas A., and Oliver A. Becke
Kenneth J. Collins, Ph.D. Updated February 16, 2009 Primary Sources: Books Published Albin, Thomas A., and Oliver A. Beckerlegge, eds. Charles Wesley's Earliest Sermons. London: Wesley Historical Society, 1987. Six unpublished manuscript sermons. Baker, Frank, ed. The Works of John Wesley. Bicentennial ed. Vol. 25: Letters I. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1980. ---. The Works of John Wesley. Bicentennial ed. Vol. 26: Letters II. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1982. ---. A Union Catalogue of the Publications of John and Charles Wesley. Stone Mountain, GA: George Zimmerman, 1991. Reprint of the 1966 edition. Burwash, Rev N., ed. Wesley's Fifty Two Standard Sermons. Salem, Ohio: Schmul Publishing Co., 1967. Cragg, Gerald R., ed. The Works of John Wesley. Bicentennial ed. Vol. 11: The Appeals to Men of Reason and Religion and Certain Related Open Letters. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1975. Curnock, Nehemiah, ed. The Journal of Rev. John Wesley. 8 vols. London: Epworth Press, 1909-1916. Davies, Rupert E., ed. The Works of John Wesley. Bicentennial ed. Vol. 9: The Methodist Societies, I: History, Nature and Design. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1989. Green, Richard. The Works of John and Charles Wesley. 2nd revised ed. New York: AMS Press, 1976. Reprint of the 1906 edition. Hildebrandt, Franz, and Oliver Beckerlegge, eds. The Works of John Wesley. Bicentennial ed. Vol. 7: A Collection of Hymns for the Use of the People Called Methodists. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1983. Idle, Christopher, ed. The Journals of John Wesley. Elgin, Illinois: Lion USA, 1996. Jackson, Thomas, ed. The Works of Rev. John Wesley. 14 vols. London: Wesleyan Methodist Book Room, 1829-1831. -
Of the Church
· .. __._--_._-------------------------------..,..- THE MET~IODIST DOCTRINE OF THE CHURCH by Durward Hofler There is no Wesleyan doctrine of the church as such, for John Wesley unlike John Calvin did not undertake a systematic com pilation of his theology or his ecclesiology. The student must search for Wesley's understanding of the church in his doctrinal views. Accordingly, this study will be limited to what can be found about the doctrine of the church in Wesley's writings and in the history of American Methodism down to 1820. Inherent in Wesley's doctrine of the witness of the spirit is his view of the church. He made some affirmations concerning the witness of the spirit which throw light on his understanding of the church. Listed in the order of their importance to Wesley the affirmations are as follows. First, Wesley insisted that he had a divine call or mission to save souls. He wrote to James Hervey on March 20,1739: On scriptural principles I do not think it hard to justify whatever I do. God in scripture commands me, according to my power, to instruct the ignorant, reform the wicked, confirm the virtuous. Man forbids me to do this in another's parish: that is, in effect, to do it at all; seeing I have now no parish of my own, nor probably ever shall. Whom, then, shall I hear, God or man? A dispensation of the gospel is committed to me; and woe is me if I preach not the gospel. ...I look upon all the world as my parish.1 Obviously in citing scripture to justify action contrary to the will of his church, Wesley was indirectly saying that the salvation of souls takes precedence over church authority and practice. -
The First Great Awakening and the American Revolution
No Lords, Spiritual or Temporal: The First Great Awakening and the American Revolution An Online Professional Development Seminar Timothy H. Breen National Humanities Center Fellow 1983-84; 1995-96 William Smith Mason Professor of American History Northwestern University We will begin promptly on the hour. The silence you hear is normal. If you do not hear anything when the images change, e-mail Caryn Koplik [email protected] for assistance. The First Great Awakening and the American Revolution GOALS To deepen understanding of the First Great Awakening and the role it played in the life of the American colonies To provide fresh primary resources and instructional approaches for use with students To enable you to make historical judgments about the Awakening‟s influence on the American Revolution americainclass.org 2 The First Great Awakening and the American Revolution FROM THE FORUM Challenges, Issues, Questions Topic is shortchanged in most American history textbooks. How did the ideas of the First Great Awakening influence the founders of the United States? What is the connection between the First Great Awakening and political activism? How did the First Great Awakening change the religious culture of the colonies, including the role of ministers? americainclass.org 3 The First Great Awakening and the American Revolution FROM THE FORUM Challenges, Issues, Questions How can we teach the First Great Awakening without raising God questions that are difficult, if not impossible, to address in class? What is -
February 12, 2021 RUSSELL EARLE RICHEY
February 12, 2021 RUSSELL EARLE RICHEY Durham Address: 1552 Hermitage Court, Durham, NC 27707; PO Box 51382, 27717-1382 Telephone Numbers: 919-493-0724 (Durham); 828-245-2485 (Sunshine); Cell: 404-213-1182 Office Address: Duke Divinity School, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0968, 919-660-3565 Email: [email protected] or [email protected] Birthdate: October 19, 1941 (Asheville, NC) Parents: McMurry S. Richey, Erika M. Richey, both deceased Married to Merle Bradley Umstead (Richey), August 28, 1965. Children--William McMurry Richey, b. December 29, 1970 and Elizabeth Umstead Richey Thompson, b. March 3, 1977. William’s spouse--Jennifer (m. 8/29/98); Elizabeth’s spouse–Bennett (m. 6/23/07) Grandchildren—Benjamin Richey, b. May 14, 2005; Ruby Richey, b. August 14, 2008; Reeves Davis Thompson, b. March 14, 2009; McClain Grace Thompson, b June 29, 2011. Educational History (in chronological order); 1959-63 Wesleyan University (Conn.) B.A. (With High Honors and Distinction in History) 1963-66 Union Theological Seminary (N.Y.C.) B.D. = M.Div. 1966-69 Princeton University, M.A. 1968; Ph.D. 1970 Honors, Awards, Recognitions, Involvements and Service: Wesleyan: Graduated with High Honors, Distinction in History, B.A. Honors Thesis on African History, and Trench Prize in Religion; Phi Beta Kappa (Junior year record); Sophomore, Junior, and Senior Honor Societies; Honorary Woodrow Wilson; elected to post of Secretary-Treasurer for student body member Eclectic fraternity, inducted into Skull and Serpent, lettered in both basketball and lacrosse; selected to participate in Operation Crossroads Africa, summer 1981 Union Theological Seminary: International Fellows Program, Columbia (2 years); field work in East Harlem Protestant Parish; participated in the Student Interracial Ministry, summer 1964; served as national co-director of SIM, 1964-65. -
Specific Name /Term / Historical Development – Think Proper Nouns)
Answer the following questions. Make sure to have examples to prove each point (specific name /term / historical development – think proper nouns). MERCANTILISM 1) Describe the economic role of the English North American colonies in Atlantic trade. 2) How did England try to regulate the English North American colonies? 3) What was salutary neglect? The English Atlantic trade system shaped the North American colonies. New England farmers supplied the sugar islands with bread, lumber, fish, and meat. New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania farmers shipped wheat, corn, and bread to the Caribbean. The southern colonies bought slaves and sold tobacco and sugar to England. Merchants in booming cities like Newport, Charleston, Boston, New York and Philadelphia were based on the shipping industry’s varied jobs. To support the shipping industry, artisans, skilled workers, and lawyers developed in the towns. Believing they had to control trade with the colonies to reap their economic benefits, English ministers wanted agricultural goods and raw materials to be carried to English ports in English vessels. In reality, Dutch and French shippers were often buying sugar and other colonial products and taking them to market around the world. To counter this practice, the Navigation Act of 1651 required all goods to be carried on English ships. Navigation Acts in 1660 and 1663 strengthened the ban on foreign traders as colonists could export sugar and tobacco only through England and three quarters of the crew had to be English. In 1673, the Revenue Act imposed a tax on American exports of sugar and tobacco. The English government backed these policies with force and expanded their merchant fleet on both sides of the Atlantic. -
Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20Th and 21St Century
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto ASPECTS OF ARMINIAN SOTERIOLOGY IN METHODIST-LUTHERAN ECUMENICAL DIALOGUES IN 20TH AND 21ST CENTURY Mikko Satama Master’s Thesis University of Helsinki Faculty of Theology Department of Systematic Theology Ecumenical Studies 18th January 2009 HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO − HELSINGFORS UNIVERSITET Tiedekunta/Osasto − Fakultet/Sektion Laitos − Institution Teologinen tiedekunta Systemaattisen teologian laitos Tekijä − Författare Mikko Satama Työn nimi − Arbetets title Aspects of Arminian Soteriology in Methodist-Lutheran Ecumenical Dialogues in 20th and 21st Century Oppiaine − Läroämne Ekumeniikka Työn laji − Arbetets art Aika − Datum Sivumäärä − Sidoantal Pro Gradu -tutkielma 18.1.2009 94 Tiivistelmä − Referat The aim of this thesis is to analyse the key ecumenical dialogues between Methodists and Lutherans from the perspective of Arminian soteriology and Methodist theology in general. The primary research question is defined as: “To what extent do the dialogues under analysis relate to Arminian soteriology?” By seeking an answer to this question, new knowledge is sought on the current soteriological position of the Methodist-Lutheran dialogues, the contemporary Methodist theology and the commonalities between the Lutheran and Arminian understanding of soteriology. This way the soteriological picture of the Methodist-Lutheran discussions is clarified. The dialogues under analysis were selected on the basis of versatility. Firstly, the sole world organisation level dialogue was chosen: The Church – Community of Grace. Additionally, the document World Methodist Council and the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification is analysed as a supporting document. Secondly, a document concerning the discussions between two main-line churches in the United States of America was selected: Confessing Our Faith Together. -
Church, State and Establishment
A REPORT ON CHURCH, STATE AND ESTABLISHMENT Received by the Methodist Conference of 2004 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS Introduction (paragraphs 1-10) - an explanation of the background to the report. Beginning with stories (11-22) - examples and stories that are told, from the past and the present, which have a bearing on the subject being discussed. Using stories and experiences (23-29) - initial reflection on how such examples and stories help to shape what we believe about ‘establishment’. Establishment (30-52) - detailed discussion of what the establishment of the Church of England entails at present, concluding with a brief comparison with other situations in the United Kingdom and beyond. Biblical material (53-70) - exploration of biblical material, particularly in the Old Testament, which underpinned discussions of the establishment of the Church of England as it was shaped in earlier centuries. Other biblical texts are also explored, more briefly. Theological material (71-82) - as with the biblical section, an exploration of theological discussions which underpinned early discussions of the establishment of the Church of England, with reflection on how the theological discussions shifted in subsequent centuries. Methodist historical background (83-88) - brief exploration of how the debates on establishment affected, or were discussed in, Methodism, largely before the 20th century. Reflections (89-109) - the drawing out of important strands and implications from the previous material in the report, focusing on such areas as mission and unity and the variety of possible models of Church/state relationships. Conclusions and recommendations (110-119) - recommendations for discussion and action for the British Methodist Church. Resolutions Appendix - a summary of previous Methodist reports on areas related to the subject of establishment, particularly on political responsibility. -
Proceedings Wesley Historical Society
Proceedings OF THE Wesley Historical Society Editor: E. ALAN ROSE, B.A. Volume XLIII December 1982 THE MANTLE OF ELIJAH Nineteenth-century Primitive Methodism and Twentieth-century Pentecostalism [This article is based on a lecture delivered to the Lincolnshire Methodist History Society at Sleaford on IOth October 1980. Many of the references are to places and events in Lincolnshire, but the author has little reason to believe that Primitive Methodism in Lincolnshire was so unique as to render these references useless to readers in other parts of Britain.] y concern in this article (hence its title) is to pose the ques tion: Has the spirit of nineteenth-century Primitive Method Mism come to rest on twentieth-century Pentecostalism? Not that one would want to be suspected of suggesting that Primitive Methodism has been taken up by a whirlwind into heaven! But it does seem that something of the spirit of the one has been taken up by the other. I must go on to say that I am in no sense suggesting a theological comparison. In some ways the two movements seem quite close in their theological bases, but that is not the point of the comparison I wish to make. Clearly their particular beliefs about the Holy Spirit lead Pentecostalists to assess the Spirit's gifts differ ently, giving them a dominant concern to seek and give evidence of the more spectacular gifts, notably that of speaking in tongues. This emphasis is quite different from that of Primitive Methodism although I should be very interested to know whether Pentecostal type manifestations accompanied early Primitive Methodism. -
ECCLESIASTICAL* on December 24, 1784
r I I ') ,tII Methodist History, 23:1 (October 1984) I I 11,J BALTIM0 RE 1784-HISTORICAL-THEOLOGICAL ! ECCLESIASTICAL* K. JAMES STEIN On December 24, 1784 some sixty Methodist preachers gathered on invitation at their Lovely Lane Chapel in Baltimore, Maryland for what j would prove to be a critically important gathering for their small but 1 rapidly growing movement in America. By the time the conference ended ;1 .1 on January 2, 1785 it had created an independent church with its own fully , I ordained ministry, sacramental life, formalized liturgy, doctrinal norms, q h 'I~ ,I ethical standards, and a sharply-defined sense of mission for the future. I :! ,I In many ways this was not an auspicious gathering. Its setting was not ! j elaborate. The little stone chapel, which no longer remains, was extremely , i plain, except for its arched windows. Especially for the comfort of the ;i .. i." preachers, the congregation had placed a large wood stove in the building and added backs to the benches in anticipation of the long conference session. 1 Moreover, most of the participants at the conference were dis tinguished in neither learning nor experience. Only a few had received a classical education and could read the Scriptures in the original languages, although a number of them were self-taught. Beyond that, most of them were not old enough to be well-experienced in ministry. Thomas Coke wrote at the time: "I admire the body of American preachers.... They are 'j" ~' I indeed a body of devoted, disinterested men, but most of them young."2 , .t-' I,,,; " ·1 One analysis of the preachers present suggested that only seven of these ::';1 men had itinerated as much as eight years.