Robinson Crusoe's Economy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Robinson Crusoe's Economy Adding Production • There will be a Production Sector – Defined by some production function • And Consumers with preferences and endowments Consumer Surplus – Usually assume they are endowed with labor/leisure and (sometimes) Capital • Consumers own the production firms ECON 370: Microeconomic Theory – So all profits are distributed back to the consumers in some way • Markets and prices Summer 2004 – Rice University – We assume there are factor markets for labor and capital Stanley Gilbert – And consumer markets for the produced good(s) – And market prices for all factors and produced goods Econ 370 - Production 2 Adding Production (cont) Robinson Crusoe’s Economy: Intro • Consumers and firms decide how much to • One agent, RC, endowed w/ a fixed qty of one demand/supply of inputs/outputs based on resource, Time = 24 hrs – Profit maximization for firms • Can use time for – Utility maximization for consumers – labor (production) or – Market prices – leisure (consumption) • We are interested in: • Labor time = L – Efficiency in production – Overall economic efficiency • Leisure time = 24 – L • What will RC choose? Econ 370 - Production 3 Econ 370 - Production 4 1 Robinson Crusoe’s Technology: Graph Robinson Crusoe’s Preferences Technology: Labor produces output (coconuts) • To represent RC’s preferences: according to a concave production function – coconut is a good Coconuts – leisure is a good • Yields standard indifference map with leisure • Yields indifference curves with positive slopes if Production function plot labor (bad) Feasible production plans 0 24 Labor (hours) Econ 370 - Production 5 Econ 370 - Production 6 Robinson Crusoe’s Preferences: Graph Robinson Crusoe’s Preferences: Graph Coconuts Coconuts More preferred More preferred Labor (hours) 0 24 Leisure (hours) 24 0 Leisure (hours) Econ 370 - Production 7 Econ 370 - Production 8 2 Robinson Crusoe’s Choice: Graph Schizophrenic Robinson Crusoe • Now suppose RC is both – a utility-maximizing consumer and Coconuts – a profit-maximizing firm – And decides separately how much to produce or consume C* • Use coconuts as the numeraire good – So, price of a coconut = $1 • RC’s wage rate is w Labor (hours) • Coconut output level is C 024L* Leisure (hours) Econ 370 - Production 9 Econ 370 - Production 10 Robinson Crusoe as a Firm Isoprofit Lines: Graph • RC’s firm’s profit is π = C – wL • Isoprofit line equation is • π = C – wL ⇔ C = π + wL, in C-L space Coconuts • Slope = + w Higher profit C = π + wL (π < π < π ) • Intercept = π 1 2 3 π3 Slopes = + w π2 π1 0 24 Labor (hours) Econ 370 - Production 11 Econ 370 - Production 12 3 Profit-Maximization: Graph Profit-Maximization: Graph • At optimum: • As a firm, at wage w Robinson: – Isoprofit slope = production function slope – demands Labor L* * – That is, w = p × MPL = 1 × MPL = MRPL – Produces C coconuts * * Coconuts –Gets π* = C – wL in dividends from the firm Production function π C* 3 * π2 π Coconuts π1 * 0 24 Labor (hours) 0 L 24 Labor (hours) Econ 370 - Production 13 Econ 370 - Production 14 Utility-Maximization: Introduction Utility-Maximization: Budget Constraint • Now consider RC as a consumer endowed with $π*, who can work for $w per hour • What is RC’s most preferred consumption bundle? • Budget constraint is: Budget constraint: C = π* + wL C = π * +wL π* Coconuts 0 24 Labor (hours) Econ 370 - Production 15 Econ 370 - Production 16 4 Utility-Maximization: Preferences Utility-Maximization: Choice •Given w, – RC’s quantity supplied of labor is L* and – output quantity demanded is C* More preferred C* π* π* Coconuts Coconuts 0 24 Labor (hours) 0 L* 24 Labor (hours) Econ 370 - Production 17 Econ 370 - Production 18 Output and Factor Markets Clear Utility and Profit-Maximization: Graph • Price is determined based on the requirement that all markets clear • That is: Coconuts – quantity output supplied = quantity output demanded – quantity labor demanded = quantity labor supplied C* • If we have: – well-behaved preferences, and – Convex production function Labor (hours) • Then such a price exists 024L* Leisure (hours) Econ 370 - Production 19 Econ 370 - Production 20 5 Pareto Efficiency: Graph Pareto Efficiency: Graph Pareto Efficiency: Must have MRS = MP Common slope ⇒ relative wage rate w results in Pareto efficient outcome Coconuts Coconuts w=MRS = MP MRS ≠ MPL L Preferred consumption C* bundles Labor (hours) Labor (hours) 024Leisure (hours) 024L* Leisure (hours) Econ 370 - Production 21 Econ 370 - Production 22 Fund. Theorems of Welfare Economics Extend to Two-Good Economy • 1st Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics • Consider RC economy with two goods – A competitive market equilibrium is Pareto efficient if: – Coconuts and fish – consumers’ preferences are convex – Both require labor to be produced – there are no externalities in consumption or production – Will now consider production possibilities of two good • 2nd Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics economy – Any Pareto efficient outcome can be achieved as a competitive market equilibrium if: – the appropriate redistribution of endowments occurs – consumers’ preferences are convex – there are no externalities in consumption or production – firms’ technologies are convex • Note convex firm technology rules out increasing returns to scale Econ 370 - Production 23 Econ 370 - Production 24 6 Production Possibilities: Introduction Production Possibilities: Graph • Resource and technological limitations restrict what an economy can produce • Production possibility set - set of all feasible Production possibility frontier (ppf) output bundles Coconuts • Production possibility frontier - the outer boundary of the production possibility set Production possibility set Fish Econ 370 - Production 25 Econ 370 - Production 26 Production Possibilities: Graph Comparative Advantage: Introduction Marginal rate of transformation (MRT) = PPF’s slope • Two agents, RC and Man Friday (MF) • Assume linear production technologies • RC can produce at most 20 coconuts or 30 fish Coconuts • MF can produce at most 50 coconuts or 25 fish • RC has comparative advantage in producing fish • PPF is concave w.r.t. origin because take advantage of comparative advantages in production Fish Econ 370 - Production 27 Econ 370 - Production 28 7 Comparative Advantage: Graph Combined Graph C C • Two agents, RC and MF Economy 20 • RC can produce at most 20 C 20 coconuts or 30 fish Use RC to produce 70 fish before using MF RC RC 30 F • MF can produce at most 30 C C F 50 50 coconuts or 25 fish 50 50 Use MF to produce coconuts before using RC MF 25 F MF 25 F 30 55 F Econ 370 - Production 29 Econ 370 - Production 30 Comparative Advantage: Graph Comparative Advantage: Graph C Economy Economy 20 C C Using low opp. cost More producers with 70 producers first RC different opp. costs 30 results in a ppf that C F “smooth out” the ppf 50 50 is concave w.r.t the origin 30 55 MF 25 F F F Econ 370 - Production 31 Econ 370 - Production 32 8 Decentralized Coordination Decentralized Coordination • RC and MF run the firm(s) producing coconuts • LRC and LMF are amounts of labor purchased from and fish RC and MF • And receive the dividends distributing the profits • Firm’s profit-maximization problem is to choose C, F, L and L to • RC and MF are also consumers who can sell labor RC MF • Price of coconut = pC maxπ = pCC + pF F − wRC LRC − wMF LMF •Price of fish = pF • RC’s wage rate = wRC •MF’s wage rate = wMF Econ 370 - Production 33 Econ 370 - Production 34 Decentralized Coordination Decentralized Coordination maxπ = pCC + pF F − wRC LRC − wMF LMF Coconuts Higher profit Isoprofit line equation is constantπ = p C + p F − w L − w L C F RC RC MF MF pF Slopes = − pC which rearranges to π + w L + w L p C = RC RC MF MF − F F pC pC 142444 43444 { intercept slope Fish Econ 370 - Production 35 Econ 370 - Production 36 9 Decentralized Coordination Decentralized Coordination Coconuts Coconuts Profit-max. plan Profit-max. plan The firm’s production Competitive markets possibility set and profit-maximization p MRT = − F pC Fish Fish Econ 370 - Production 37 Econ 370 - Production 38 Decentralized Coordination Coordinating Production and Consumption • Competitive markets, profit-maximization, and • The PPF contains many technically efficient utility maximization all together cause output bundles • Which are Pareto efficient for consumers? pF MRPT = − = MRS • As before, those where pC – If both consumers and producers face the same price, • This is the condition necessary for a Pareto – Markets clear optimal economic state • Alternatively, – Given that markets clear, – Both consumers and producers face the same price Econ 370 - Production 39 Econ 370 - Production 40 10 Coordinating Production and Consumption Coordinating Production and Consumption Suppose for given prices The production bundle forms Coconuts Coconuts output bundle (F’, C’) an Edgeworth Box for the O C′ Maximized profits C′ MF two consumers, with wages and dividends forming the endowment F′ Fish ORC F′ Fish Econ 370 - Production 41 Econ 370 - Production 42 Coordinating Production and Consumption Coordinating Production and Consumption In this case, we do not have • Efficient coordination of production and Coconuts an equilibrium, since the consumption requires: O C′ MF price to consumers and dx dx producers is different. MRS = 2 (cons) = 2 (prod) = MRT dx1 dx1 • Or, could reallocate and make both individuals better off • MRS = MRT necessary for Pareto optimality ORC F′ Fish Econ 370 - Production 43 Econ 370 - Production 44 11 Coordinating Production and Consumption Coconuts C′ OMF ORC F′ Fish Econ 370 - Production 45 12.
Recommended publications
  • Fisherian and Ricardian Trade
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Sinn, Stefan Working Paper — Digitized Version Fisherian and Ricardian trade Kiel Working Paper, No. 484 Provided in Cooperation with: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Suggested Citation: Sinn, Stefan (1991) : Fisherian and Ricardian trade, Kiel Working Paper, No. 484, Kiel Institute of World Economics (IfW), Kiel This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/47019 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Kieler Arbeitspapiere Kiel Working Papers Working Paper No. 484 FISHERIAN AND RICARDIAN TRADE by Stefair Sinn Institut fiir Weltwirtschaft an der Universitat Kiel The Kiel Institute of World Economics ISSN 0342-0787 The Kiel Institute of World Economics D-2300 Kiel, Dusternbrooker Weg 120 Working Paper No.
    [Show full text]
  • Income Inequality and Poverty: Are We Asking the Right Questions?
    NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal Vol. 16. No. 1-2, 2020 In this issue: Youliy Ninov: An Alternative View on Saving and Investment From an Austrian Economics Perspective Bradley K. Hobbs and Nikolai G. Wenzel: Income Inequality and Poverty: Are We Asking the Right Questions? Jakub Bożydar Wiśniewski: Austrian Economics as a Paradigm of Golden Mean Thinking Frank Daumann and Florian Follert: COVID-19 and Rent-Seeking Competition: Some Insights from Germany NEW PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICAL ECONOMY A Bilingual Interdisciplinary Journal New Perspectives on Political Economy is a peer-reviewed semi-annual bilingual interdisciplinary journal, published since 2005 in Prague. The journal aims at contributing to scholarship at the intersection of political science, political philosophy, political economy and law. The main objective of the journal is to enhance our understanding of private property-, market- and individual liberty-based perspectives in the respected sciences. We also believe that only via exchange among social scientists from different fields and cross-disciplinary research can we critically analyze and fully understand forces that drive policy-making and be able to spell out policy implications and consequences. The journal welcomes submissions of unpublished research papers, book reviews, and educational notes. Published by CEVRO Institute Academic Press New Perspectives on Political Economy CEVRO Institute, Jungmannova 17, 110 00 Praha 1, Czech Republic Manuscripts should be submitted electronically to [email protected]. Full text available via DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals and also via EBSCO Publishing databases. Information for Authors Authors submitting manuscripts should include abstracts of not more than 250 words and JEL classification codes.
    [Show full text]
  • Robinson Crusoe Meets Walras and Keynes1
    Department of Economics, University of California Daniel McFadden © 1975, 2003 ______________________________________________________________________________ ROBINSON CRUSOE MEETS WALRAS AND KEYNES1 Once upon a time on an idyllic South Seas Isle lived a shipwrecked sailor, Robinson Crusoe, in solitary splendor. The only product of the island, fortunately adequate for Robinson’s sustenance, was the wild yam, which Robinson found he could collect by refraining from a life of leisure long enough to dig up his dinner. With a little experimentation, Robinson found that the combinations of yams and hours of leisure he could obtain on a typical day (and every day was a typical day) were given by the schedule shown in Figure 1.2 Being a rational man, Robinson quickly concluded that he should on each 1. Robinson's Production Possibilities day choose the combination of yams and hours of leisure on his production 15 possibility schedule which made him the happiest. Had he been quizzed by a 12 patient psychologist, Robinson would have revealed the preferences illustrated in 9 Figure 2, with I1, I2, … each representing 6 a locus of leisure/yam combinations that make him equally happy; e.g., Robinson 3 would prefer to be on curve I2 rather than I1, but if forced to be on curve I2, he Pounds of Yams per Day 0 would be indifferent among the points in 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 I2. You can think of Robinson’s Hours of Leisure per Day preferences being represented as a mountain, the higher the happier, and Figure 2 is a contour map of this preference mountain, with each contour identifying a fixed elevation.3 The result of Robinson’s choice is seen by superimposing Figures 1 and 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermediate Micro-Economics
    MICROECONOMICS 3 CLASS #7 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM – ROBINSON CRUSOE’S ECONOMY Problem #1 Find the ratio of (competitive) equilibrium prices for goods x and y that provide for efficiency of consumption and production, when the production possibilities frontier is: x2 + 4y2 = 200 and the utility function is: U = (xy)0.5. Determine the produced (consumed) amount of goods x and y in this case. Problem #2 Robinson Crusoe decided that he will spend exactly 8 hours per day searching for food. He can spend this time looking for coconuts or fishing. He is able to catch 1 fish or find 2 coconuts in 1 hour. a) Find the formula for Robinson’s production possibilities frontier. b) Robinson’s utility function is U(F,C) = FC, where F is his daily consumption of fish and C – of coconuts. How many fish will Robinson catch and how many coconuts will he find? c) One day a native inhabitant of another island arrived on Robinson’s island. On this other island catching a fish takes 1 hour and finding a coconut – 2 hours. The visitor offered trade at an exchange rate that operates on his island, however Robinson will have to give him 1 fish as a fee for bringing him back to his island. Will Robinson profit from this trade? If yes, will he be buying fish and selling coconuts or vice versa? d) A few days later a native inhabitant of a different island arrived. On his island catching a fish takes 4 hours and finding a coconut – 1 hour. He offered Robinson trade at an exchange rate that operates on his (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Economics 2 Professor Christina Romer Spring 2016 Professor David Romer
    Economics 2 Professor Christina Romer Spring 2016 Professor David Romer LECTURE 2 SCARCITY AND CHOICE January 21, 2016 I. SOME KEY CONCEPTS A. Scarcity 1. Economists’ definition of scarcity 2. Constraints faced by individuals, firms, and whole economies B. Choice C. Opportunity cost D. Examples of opportunity cost 1. A firm that can produce two goods 2. Allocating your time between two activities 3. Buying a good in the market 4. Going to graduate school 5. Doing your own home repairs 6. A good whose market price has changed since you bought it II. THE PRODUCTION POSSIBILITIES CURVE A. Robinson Crusoe’s economy B. Robinson’s PPC C. Attainable and unattainable points on the PPC D. The PPC and opportunity cost E. Potential curvature of the PPC F. Possible shifts in Robinson’s PPC III. APPLICATION: HEALTH SPENDING IN THE UNITED STATES A. Facts and issues B. Setting up the PPC diagram C. Implications of the PPC D. Interpreting the higher spending in the United States 1. Possibility #1: Similar PPCs, different points 2. Possibility #2: Inefficiency in the United States 3. Possibility #3: Different PPCs Economics 2 Christina Romer Spring 2016 David Romer LECTURE 2 Scarcity and Choice January 21, 2016 Announcements • Reminder: Make sure to attend your first section meeting. • If you miss it and want to stay in the course, email your GSI. (Section information and GSI email addresses are on the course website.) • A word of advice: Engage! Read actively, take notes and think about lecture actively, participate in section actively. • Reminder: We have a no electronics policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape, Culture, and Education in Defoe's Robinson Crusoe
    CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture ISSN 1481-4374 Purdue University Press ©Purdue University Volume 14 (2012) Issue 3 Article 9 Landscape, Culture, and Education in Defoe's Robinson Crusoe Geert Vandermeersche Ghent University Ronald Soetaert Ghent University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb Part of the Comparative Literature Commons, and the Critical and Cultural Studies Commons Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarship following tenets of the discipline of comparative literature and the field of cultural studies designated as "comparative cultural studies." Publications in the journal are indexed in the Annual Bibliography of English Language and Literature (Chadwyck-Healey), the Arts and Humanities Citation Index (Thomson Reuters ISI), the Humanities Index (Wilson), Humanities International Complete (EBSCO), the International Bibliography of the Modern Language Association of America, and Scopus (Elsevier). The journal is affiliated with the Purdue University Press monograph series of Books in Comparative Cultural Studies. Contact: <[email protected]> Recommended Citation Vandermeersche, Geert; and Soetaert, Ronald. "Landscape, Culture, and Education in Defoe's Robinson Crusoe." CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 14.3 (2012): <https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2043> This text has been double-blind peer reviewed by 2+1 experts in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward Economics As a New Complex System
    Toward Economics as a New Complex System Taisei Kaizoji Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, International Christian University Abstract The 2015 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded to Eugene Fama, Lars Peter Hansen and Robert Shiller for their contributions to the empirical analysis of asset prices. Eugene Fama [1] is an advocate of the efficient market hypothesis. The efficient market hypothesis assumes that asset price is determined by using all available information and only reacts to new information not incorporated into the fundamentals. Thus, the movement of stock prices is unpredictable. Robert Shiller [2] has been studying the existence of irrational bubbles, which are defined as the long term deviations of asset price from the fundamentals. This drives us to the unsettled question of how the market actually works. In this paper, I look back at the development of economics and consider the direction in which we should move in order to truly understand the workings of an economic society. Establishment of economics as a mathematical science General equilibrium theory, originated by Leon Walras [3], is a starting point for the development of economics as a mathematical science. It indicates that aggregate demand accords simultaneously with aggregate supply in many competitive markets. Walras proposed an auction process (tatonnement process) formalizing Adam Smith’s theory of the "invisible hand", according to which unobservable forces adjust the equilibrium price to match supply and demand in a competitive market. Paul Samuelson took a hint for his economic theories from classical mechanics, as first presented by Issac Newton (Lagrangian analytical mechanics) [4]. More concretely, by applying the method of Lagrange multipliers, Samuelson mathematically formulated the behavior of economic agents as a constrained optimization problem in his Foundations of Economic Analysis published in 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Microeconomics Simple Economy with Production
    Advanced Microeconomics Simple economy with production Jan Hagemejer November 27, 2011 Jan Hagemejer Advanced Microeconomics Introducing production We start with a simplest possible setting: single consumer and a single rm. Two goods: labor/leisure and a consumption good produced by the rm This is often referred to as Robinson Crusoe economy. Jan Hagemejer Advanced Microeconomics The rm The rm uses labor to produce the consumption goods. Increasing and strictly concave production function f (z), where z is the labour input. To produce output the rm purchases some labour from the consumer. The rm takes market prices as given. Jan Hagemejer Advanced Microeconomics The rm The rm solves the standard prot maximization problem: Max pf (z) − wz: z≥0 Given prices (p; w) the rms optimal: labor demand is z(p; w) [labor demand function] output is q(p; w) [supply function] prots are π(p; w): [prot function] Jan Hagemejer Advanced Microeconomics The rm Jan Hagemejer Advanced Microeconomics Consumer Consumer is the sole owner of the rm and receives all the prots. Consumer (labour owner) is hired by the rm at the same time. He has endowment L¯ of labour. Consumer preferences are represented by a utility function u(x1; x2): x1 is the consumption of leisure, therefore labour supply is L¯ − x1 x2 is the consumption good The consumer problem given prices is: Max u(x1; x2) s.t. px2 ≤ w(L¯ − x1) + π(p; w): x x 2 ( 1; 2)2R+ Budget constraint reects the two sources of income for a consumer. Jan Hagemejer Advanced Microeconomics Consumer Jan Hagemejer Advanced
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 12, Micro Theory I)
    Robinson Crusoe Economy Joseph Tao-yi Wang 2008/12/12 (Lecture 12, Micro Theory I) 1 Chapter Overview Ch.3: Equilibrium in an Exchange Economy; This Chapter: generalize to include production Section 5.1: Simplest economy possible: Robinson Crusoe Economy (1 person only) Section 5.2: General equilibrium model with production and the 1 st & 2 nd Welfare Theorem Section 5.3: Existence of a Walrasian Equil. Sec. 5.4-6: Examples--time, public goods, CRS In this course, only have time for CRS example 2 One Person Economy: Robinson Crusoe Economy The simplest case: Robinson Crusoe Economy Robinson the manager (price-taker) Decides how much output to produce Crusoe the consumer (price-taker) Decides how many hours to work and how much output to consume Walrasian Equilibrium: Market clearing price Does the Walrasian Equilibrium always exist? Not if the production set is not convex… 3 Why do we care about this? Equilibrium is the central concept in economics Where forces of supply and demand balance out Empirically used to predict outcome Robinson Crusoe Economy: See how it works in the simplest example (one person economy) Get intuition about how it works in this “toy model” Then generalize to other cases… What if you happen to be in an island alone? Also, some macro models have only one agent! 4 One Person Economy: Robinson Crusoe Economy 2 Commodities: Labor hours (good 1) & corn (2) Consumers: Endowment : As if ONE representative agent : Robinson Crusoe with endowment: Single Firm: with convex production set 5 Produce
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a SAM?
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized SWP463 The views and interpretations in this document are those of the author and should not be attributed to the World Bank, to its affiliated organiza- tions, or to any individual acting kn their behalf. WORIl) Brn Staff Working Paper No- 463 June 1981 WRAT IS A SAM? A LAPMAN'S GUIDE TO SOCIAL ACCOUNTING MATRICES This paper is intended as an introduction for readers who have no previous familiarity with social accounting matrices. It assumes nothing more from the reader than a rudimentary knowledge of national income accounting. Starting f tom the simplest formlation, the paper introduces step by step many of the main features of a social accounting matrix in its fully developed and more complex form. An explanation is given of the relationship between social accounting matrices on the one hand and national accounts, input-output matrices and multipliers on the other. Prepared by: Benjamin 9. King Development Economics Department Development Policy Staff Copyright @ 1981 The World Bank 1818 H. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, U.S.A. PREFACE This paper has its origin in a conference held in Cambridge, England in 1978, which was sponsored by the World Bank External Research Program under research project 671-27. The author was one of the two participants at that conference who did not belong to the "subculture" of practitioners and connoisseurs of SAMs or social accounting matrices. Graham Pyatt, who is responsible for the research project and who organized the conference, subsequently persuaded the author to write a guide to SAMs fcr the layman.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Instability and Economic Complexity: Economic Lessons from Transition Experiments1
    MARKET INSTABILITY AND ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY: ECONOMIC LESSONS FROM TRANSITION EXPERIMENTS1 Abstract Washington consensus and shock therapy forgot Keynesian lessons from the Great Depression: market instability and the active role of government in promoting growth. The severe output decline in East Europe and former Soviet Union (EEFSU) was triggered by simple-minded policy of liberalization and privatization, which ignored economic complexity and multiple equilibriums under division of labor. New fundamental issues, such as chain reactions between macro instability and micro behavior, the government role of creating learning space in development, interactions among economic openness, sustainable growth, social stability, can be revealed from comparative experiments between China and EEFSU, including exchange rate regime, price dynamics, trade policies, and reform strategies. The tremendous cost of the Transition Depression sheds new light on theoretical limitations of demand-supply analysis, hard-budget constraints, microfoundations theory in macroeconomics, and property right school in institutional economics. New development policy based on learning, innovation, and decentralized experiment will broaden our scope of economic thinking. 1 [email protected]. Ping Chen, is Professor of economics at China Center for Economic Research at Peking University, Beijing, China; and Senior Research Fellow at Center for New Political Economy at Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 1 1. Introduction: the Forgotten Lessons from the Great Depression There were two conflicting views on the nature of market economy and business cycles. Equilibrium school in classical economics believes that market economy is essentially stable because of stabilizing mechanism of demand and supply forces (Marshall 1920), economic fluctuations are mainly driven by external shocks (Frisch 1933).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Robinson Crusoe Economy
    ECON 301: General Equilibrium II (Production) 1 Intermediate Microeconomics II, ECON 301 General Equilibrium II: Production Whereas previously we examined an exchange economy free of production, where agents are born with a ¯xed set of goods, and exchange or trade towards a mutually agreeable equilibrium, we will now include the production facet into our consideration, but within the context of general equilibrium still. When production is included the amount of goods within a market is no longer ¯xed, but varies dependent on the market prices for the goods. 1 The Robinson Crusoe Economy Just as in the previous discussion, we had stipulated the framework ¯rst, the minimum assumptions to examine general equilibrium with production are as follows; 1. There are two agents again, one of which is a consumer, and the other is a producer. 2. There are two goods produced within the economy. Such an economy is typically called a The Robinson Crusoe Economy. Robinson Crusoe multi-tasks in the economy by being both the producer and consumer, where he can either choose to enjoy the scenery of the remote island on which he has found himself, or spend his time hunting and gathering. He needs to balance his utility increasing pursuit of day-dreaming or utility diminishing pursuit of production and relieving his hunger. We can depict such an economy in the same manner as before with some modi¯cations. Noting a few not so subtle di®erences with respect to your prior understanding of Intermediate Microeconomics, the previous classes, the indi®erence map now is such that the indi®erence curves are all upward sloping.
    [Show full text]