Prepared For: TERA Environmental Consultants

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

5.2.21 Manitou Station (NW 17-4-8 WPM) Proposed project activities at the Manitou Station include installation of four new pumps (1,500 HP), a new electrical services building and a sump system for the LSr project component. Proposed activities associated with the Line 2 modifications project component at the Manitou Station include relocation of the DRA skid.

SUMMARY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ELEMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE MANITOU STATION MODIFICATIONS

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Physical Environment • Manitou Station lies within the Souris Plain Subdivision of the Western Upland Physiographic Division (Barto and Vogel 1978). • The site is underlain by the Coulter Member of the Riding Mountain Formation. The Coulter Member is characterized by soft grey bentonitic clayey siltstone and shale (Manitoba Mineral Resources Division 1979). • There are no areas of permafrost in the vicinity of Manitou Station (NRC 2006a). • There are no documented major earthquakes, landslides or avalanches in the vicinity of the site (NRC 2006b, c,d). • The topography in the area of Manitou Station is level and the elevation is approximately 1,590 m asl. • The site encounters glacial till composed of calcareous clay diamicton, predominantly derived from Mesozoic shale from above the Manitoba escarpment (Manitoba Land Initiative 2006). • The modifications to Manitou Station will be undertaken within an existing pump station site. Possible sources of soil contamination include spot spills and leaks that may have occurred during past onsite activities. A search of the Federal Contaminated Sites and Solid Waste Landfills Inventory and the Manitoba Contaminated Sites List has revealed no listed contamination at the site (Manitoba Conservation 2002, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2006). • The climate in the area is marked by short, warm summers and long, cold winters with continuous snow cover (Environment Canada 2006b). Soil Capability • The modifications to Manitou Station will be undertaken within an existing fenced industrial site lacking topsoil and, therefore, detailed soil information is not deemed warranted as per Table A-3 of the Filing Manual. • See Physical Environment for potential contaminated soil. Water Quality and • The surface waters in the vicinity of Manitou Station form part of the Pembina River Quantity watershed of the Assiniboine River Basin (Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). • No watercourses lie within 30 m of Manitou Station. The nearest watercourse to the site is Mary Jane Creek which is located approximately 2.5 km southwest of the site. • Enbridge has an existing groundwater monitoring system in place at Manitou Station to monitor groundwater quality and quantity. Any ground disturbance associated with the modifications at the site will be limited to shallow depths and are not expected to impact groundwater quality. Contaminants of concern associated with the modifications that may affect water quality, if spilled or leaked, include crude oil, diesel fuel, lubricants and hydraulic fluids. • There is one water well identified within the quarter-section utilized for domestic purposes (Manitoba Water Stewardship 2006). Activities associated with the modifications to Manitou Station are not anticipated to have any effects on well water quantity or quality. • Rental fluids will be used for hydrostatic testing. In the unlikely event that Enbridge will withdraw water for hydrostatic testing, they will follow all applicable provincial regulations.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-153

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Air Quality • Air quality in the area surrounding Manitou Station is primarily a function of anthropogenic sources of emissions such as those arising from vehicle and rail traffic on adjacent roads and railways and from equipment used for farming. • Manitou Station is located approximately 7 km northeast of Manitou, Manitoba. The nearest residence is located 200 m north of the site. • The modifications to Manitou Station will not result in an increase in measurable airborne emissions during operations or maintenance since the pumps are electrically driven. Acoustic Environment • Current sources of noise emissions in the area surrounding Manitou Station are from vehicle and rail traffic on adjacent roads and railways and from equipment used for farming. • Manitou Station is located approximately 7 km northeast of Manitou, Manitoba. The nearest residence is located 200 m north of the site. • Noise levels at Manitou Station may increase during operation of the LSr pipeline. Fish and Fish Habitat • The activities associated with the modifications to Manitou Station will not impact fish or fish habitat. • The nearest potential fish-bearing watercourse is Mary Jane Creek located approximately 2.5 km southwest of the site. Wetlands • The nearest natural water feature is a wet slough located approximately 300 m west of the site. • There are no wetlands within 30 m of the terminal. Vegetation • Manitou Station is located within the Aspen Parkland Ecoregion of the Prairie Ecozone (Environment Canada 2006b). • The site is located within an existing disturbed and fenced industrial area devoid of vegetation and, therefore, detailed vegetation information is not deemed warranted as per Table A-3 of the Filing Manual. Wildlife and Wildlife • Manitou Station is not located within or near any National Wildlife Areas or Provincial Habitat Wildlife Management Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries, Important Bird Areas, Ramsar wetlands or World Biosphere Reserves (Environment Canada 2006d, Important Bird Areas of Canada 2006, Bureau of the Convention on Wetlands 2006, UNESCO 2006, Government of Manitoba 2006b, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). • The modifications at Manitou Station will occur within an existing large, previously disturbed industrial site, which is not considered to be suitable wildlife habitat. No impacts to wildlife or wildlife habitat are expected to occur as a result of the pump station modifications. Species at Risk or • The modifications at Manitou Station will occur within an existing large, previously Species of Special disturbed industrial site, which is not considered suitable habitat for wildlife or plant Status species at risk. Nevertheless, depending on the surrounding land use, construction activities at the site could disturb wildlife SARA-listed species within 500 m of the terminal. Manitou Station lies within the home range of the following SARA-listed species: least bittern (lxobrychus exilis), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus excubitorides); sprague's pipit (Anthus spragueii); yellow rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis); northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens); and monarch (Danaus plexippus) (Environment Canada 2006c). It is anticipated that only bird SARA-listed species utilizing the pasture lands within 500 m of the site have the potential to be disturbed by construction activities. • Waiting on response from the MB CDC regarding any plant or wildlife species of concern in the vicinity of the pump station (MB CDC 2006b).

February 2007 4663 Page 5-154

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Human Occupancy • The existing Manitou Station is situated on lands owned by Enbridge. Adjacent lands and Resource Use are privately-owned and are primarily used for farming. The site is located on lands administered by the RM of Pembina No. 161 that have been zoned as Agricultural General (Rural Municipality of Pembina No. 161 2004). The proposed facilities are compatible with zoning at this site. • The pump station does not encounter: rural or urban residential areas; Indian Reserves or Aboriginal communities; recreation and park areas; lands under Parks Canada jurisdiction or conservation areas, controlled or managed forest areas; water reserves and licenses or water intakes or land and water based transportation infrastructure. The pump station is not adjacent to any Environmentally Significant Areas, proposed or existing parks, Ecological Reserves, Provincial Recreation Areas, designated Wilderness or Natural Areas (Indian and Northern Affairs Canada 2006, Government of Manitoba 2006b, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). The International Biological Program is no longer active. • The pump station is situated an existing industrial site on private lands next to several roads and, as such, it is unlikely that any hunting and guiding occurs next to the terminal. All hunters require permission from the landowner. • Due to the large proportion of land in private ownership and under industrial use and cultivation surrounding the pump station, recreational use of the lands around this location is limited. There are no provincial parks, recreation areas or environmentally significant areas within close proximity to the site. • There is water well identified within the quarter-section utilized for domestic purposes (Manitoba Water Stewardship 2006). • The modifications to Manitou Station will entail the construction of new pumps building and sump systems and the installation of a DRA skid which may be considered an aesthetic impact. Heritage Resources • Since Manitou Station is located within a highly disturbed industrial site stripped of topsoil, the potential for historical resources is considered negligible. Traditional Land and • Given that the modifications at Manitou Station will be undertaken in an industrial area Resource Use on patented lands, traditional use of the lands in the vicinity of the pump station is not anticipated to be affected by the construction or operation of the proposed facilities. Social and Cultural • The Town of Manitou is located approximately 7 km southwest of Manitou Station. In Well-Being 2001, the population of Manitou was reported as 775. Approximately 19% of the Manitou population is between 25 and 44 years old, which represents the largest age demographic. The median age of the population is 49 years. Manitou had a workforce of 390 people in 2001. The main industries include wholesale and retail trade, health and education, and agriculture and other resource based trade industries (Statistics Canada 2006ff). • The modifications will entail a small workforce using the services of the surrounding communities over a short period. Human Health • Nuisance air and noise emissions will be associated with the construction of Manitou Station. The effects of these nuisance emissions are discussed under Air Quality and Acoustic Environment elements. • Air emissions are not expected to increase during operations. Although noise levels at Manitou Station may increase during operation of the LSr pipeline, Enbridge will undertake post-construction noise monitoring at the station to ensure compliance with Alberta EUB Noise Directive 038. Infrastructure and • Access to Manitou Station is via Highway 244 and local rural roads. The CN Railway is Services located approximately 4.5 km south of the existing pump station. Power utilities currently service the existing site, and waste management facilities are available at the RM of Thompson waste disposal grounds near Miami, approximately 32 km northeast of the site (Province of Manitoba 2000s). • Various services are provided in the town of Manitou including accommodation, restaurants, recreational facilities and emergency services (i.e., police, ambulance, fire and hospitals) (Province of Manitoba 2000v). Employment and • In 2001, Virden had a 60% participation rate in the labour force with an employment rate Economy of 58.5% and an unemployment rate of 0% (Statistics Canada 2006ff).

February 2007 4663 Page 5-155

4663_FIG_5-23_MANITOU.mxd 5459000 5460000 5461000 5462000 5463000 5464000 IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE 532000 532000 24 13 12 533000 533000 TWP. 4, RGE. 9 W1M ¾À 244

TWP. 4, RGE. 8 W1M 19 18 7 534000 534000 RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF PEMBINA OF MUNICIPALITY RURAL

MILE 47W MANITOU STATION 535000 535000 20 17 8 MILE 21 536000 536000 IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE 537000 537000 21 16 9

5459000 5460000 5461000 5462000 5463000 5464000 Although there is no reason to believe that there a there believe that to Althoughreason isno there data used to generate this product or in produc the dataproduct this generate used to Municipalities, Populated Places, Parks and Parks Places, Protect Populated Municipalities, ALBERTA District Boundaries: Ensight DistrictInformationServices, Boundaries: MONTANA SOUTHERN LIGHTSPROJECT Road: GeoBase®, Government of Canada, of 2006. Road: Government GeoBase®, UNITED STATES TERRITORIES NORTHWEST Hydrography: Government of Hydrography:Government 2006 Manitoba, ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC. advised that errors in the data may be present. may errors be inadvised data that the REGIONAL LOCATIONOF CANADA Imagery: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Imagery:EnbridgePipelines MANITOUSTATION UTM GRID: Zone 14, NAD 83. UTMGRID:NAD 14, Zone SASKATCHEWAN (NW17-4-8 WPM) Parkand Protected Area MunicipalDistrict County / Line MunicipalBoundary Road ProposedLSr Pipeline FIGURE5.23 LEGEND 4663 (AllLocations Approximate) .50.5 0.25 0 NORTH DAKOTA NORTH SCALE: 1:20,000 re any errors associated with the the associated rewith any errors NUNAVUT t itself, users of these data are itself, t these data users of ed Areas: ESRIed 2005. MANITOBA February 2007 2006 MANITOU km Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

5.2.22 St. Leon Station (SW 33-4-9 WPM) Proposed project activities at the St. Leon Station include piping modifications as part of the Line 13 reversal project component.

SUMMARY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ELEMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE ST. LEON STATION MODIFICATIONS

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Physical Environment • St. Leon Station lies within the Pembina Mountain Subdivision of the Western Upland Physiographic Division (Barto and Vogel 1978). • The site is underlain by the Coulter Member of the Riding Mountain Formation. The Coulter Member is characterized by soft grey bentonitic clayey siltstone and shale (Manitoba Geological Survey 2006a). • There are no areas of permafrost within the area of St. Leon Station (NRC 2006a). • There are no documented major earthquakes, landslides or avalanches in the vicinity of the site (NRC 2006b,c,d). • The topography in the area of St. Leon Station is level and the elevation is approximately 484 m asl. • The site encounters glacial till composed of calcareous clay diamicton, predominantly derived from Mesozoic shale from above the Manitoba escarpment (Manitoba Geological Survey 2006b). • The modifications to St. Leon Station will be undertaken within an existing pump station site. Possible sources of soil contamination include spot spills and leaks that may have occurred during past onsite activities. St. Leon Station is listed in the Manitoba Contaminated Sites List (Manitoba Conservation 2002, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2006). • The climate in the area is marked by short, warm summers and long, cold winters with continuous snow cover (Environment Canada 2006b). Soil Capability • The modifications to St. Leon Station will be undertaken within an existing fenced industrial site lacking topsoil and, therefore, detailed soil information is not deemed warranted as per Table A-3 of the Filing Manual. • See Physical Environment for potential contaminated soil. Water Quality and • The surface waters in the vicinity of St. Leon Station form part of the Pembina River Quantity Watershed of the Red River Basin (Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). • No watercourses lie within 30 m of St. Leon Station. The nearest watercourse to the site is an unnamed tributary to Syndicate Creek located approximately 1.5 km south of the site. A wet slough lies approximately 50 m north of the site. • Enbridge has an existing groundwater monitoring system in place at St. Leon Station to monitor groundwater quality and quantity. Any ground disturbance associated with the modifications at the site will be limited to shallow depths and are not expected to impact groundwater quality. Contaminants of concern associated with the modifications that may affect water quality, if spilled or leaked, include crude oil, diesel fuel, lubricants and hydraulic fluids. • There is one water well identified within the quarter-section which is used for domestic purposes (Manitoba Water Stewardship 2006). Activities associated with the modifications to St. Leon Station are not anticipated to have any effects on well water quantity or quality. • Rental fluids will be used for hydrostatic testing. In the unlikely event that Enbridge will withdraw water for hydrostatic testing, they will follow all applicable provincial regulations. Air Quality • Air quality in the vicinity of the pump station is primarily a function of anthropogenic sources of emissions such as those arising from vehicle traffic on adjacent roads and from equipment used for farming.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-157

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Air Quality (cont’d) • St. Leon Station is located approximately 5 km southwest of the hamlet of St. Leon. The nearest residence is located 1,200 m northeast of the site. • The modifications to St. Leon Station will not result in an increase in measurable airborne emissions during operations or maintenance since the pumps are electrically driven. Acoustic Environment • Current sources of noise emissions in the area surrounding St. Leon Station are from vehicle traffic on adjacent roads and from equipment used for farming. • St. Leon Station is located approximately 5 km southwest of the hamlet of St. Leon. The nearest residence is located 1,200 m northeast of the site. • The modifications to St. Leon Station will not result in an increase in the ambient noise level during operations. Fish and Fish Habitat • The activities associated with the modifications to St. Leon Station will not impact fish or fish habitat. • The nearest potential fish-bearing watercourse is an unnamed tributary to Syndicate Creek located approximately 1.5 km south of the site. Wetlands • The nearest natural water feature is a wet slough approximately 50 m north of the site. • There are no wetlands within 30 m of the pump station. Vegetation • St. Leon Station is located within the Aspen Parkland Ecoregion of the Prairie Ecozone (Environment Canada 2006b). • The site is located within an existing disturbed and fenced industrial area devoid of vegetation and, therefore, detailed vegetation information is not deemed warranted as per Table A-3 of the Filing Manual. Wildlife and Wildlife • St. Leon Station is not located within or near any National Wildlife Areas or Provincial Habitat Wildlife Management Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries, Important Bird Areas, Ramsar wetlands or World Biosphere Reserves (Environment Canada 2006d, Important Bird Areas of Canada 2006, Bureau of the Convention on Wetlands 2006, UNESCO 2006, Government of Manitoba 2006b, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). • The modifications at St. Leon Station will occur within an existing large, previously disturbed industrial site, which is not considered to be suitable wildlife habitat. No impacts to wildlife or wildlife habitat are expected to occur as a result of the pump station modifications. Species at Risk or • The modifications at St. Leon Station will occur within an existing large, previously Species of Special disturbed industrial site, which is not considered suitable habitat for wildlife or plant Status species at risk. Nevertheless, depending on the surrounding land use, construction activities at the site could disturb wildlife SARA-listed species within 500 m of the pump station. St. Leon Station lies within the home range of the following SARA-listed species: eastern wolf (Canis lupus lycaon); grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus); least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis); loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus excubitorides); Sprague's pipit (Anthus spragueii); yellow rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis); northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens); and monarch (Danaus plexippus) (Environment Canada 2006c). Considering lands within 500 m of the site are cultivated, the potential for SARA-listed species to be disturbed by construction activities is low. • A search of the Manitoba CDC database did not indicate any plant or wildlife species of concern in the vicinity of the pump station (Manitoba CDC 2006b). Human Occupancy • Since the early 1970s, lands at the site have been used as a pipeline facility. and Resource Use • The existing St. Leon Station is situated on lands owned by Enbridge. Adjacent lands are privately-owned and are primarily used for farming. The site is located on lands administered by the RM of Pembina No. 161 that have been zoned as agricultural (RM of Pembina 2004). The proposed facilities are compatible with zoning at this site.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-158

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Human Occupancy • The pump station does not encounter: rural or urban residential areas; Indian Reserves and Resource Use or Aboriginal communities; recreation and park areas; lands under Parks Canada (cont’d) jurisdiction or conservation areas, controlled or managed forest areas; water reserves and licenses or water intakes or land and water based transportation infrastructure. The pump station is not adjacent to any Environmentally Significant Areas, proposed or existing parks, Ecological Reserves, Provincial Recreation Areas, designated Wilderness or Natural Areas (INAC 2006, Government of Manitoba 2006b, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). The International Biological Program is no longer active. • The pump station is situated within an existing industrial site on private lands next to several roads and, as such, it is unlikely that any hunting and guiding occurs next to the pump station. All hunters require permission from the landowner. • Due to the large proportion of land in private ownership and under industrial use and cultivation surrounding the pump station, recreational use of the lands around this location is limited. There are no provincial parks, recreation areas or environmentally significant areas in close proximity to the site. • There is one water well identified within the quarter-section which is used for domestic purposes (Manitoba Water Stewardship 2006). • The modifications at St. Leon Station will entail the construction of above-ground pipes which may be considered an aesthetic impact. Heritage Resources • Since St. Leon Station is located within a highly disturbed industrial site stripped of topsoil and there will be no ground disturbance, the potential for historical resources is considered negligible. Traditional Land and • Given that the modifications at St. Leon Station will be undertaken in an industrial area Resource Use on patented lands, traditional use of the lands in the vicinity of the pump station is not anticipated to be affected by the construction or operation of the proposed facilities. Social and Cultural • The Town of Somerset is located 7 km north of St. Leon Station. In 2001, it had a Well-Being population of 459. Approximately 25% of the population is between 25 and 44 years old which represents the largest age demographic. The median age of the population is 39 years. The town had a workforce of 165 people in 2001. The main industries include health and education, agriculture and other resource-based industries, and business services (Statistics Canada 2006f). • The Town of Manitou is located 13 km south St. Leon Station. In 2001, it had a population of 775. Approximately 19% of the population is between 25 and 44 years old which represents the largest age demographic. The median age of the population is 49 years. The town had a workforce of 385 people in 2001. The main industries include wholesale and retail trade, health and education, and agriculture and other resource- based industries and business services (Statistics Canada 2006ff). • The modifications will entail a small workforce using the services of the surrounding communities over a short period. Human Health • Nuisance air and noise emissions will be associated with the construction of St. Leon Station. The effects of these nuisance emissions are discussed under Air Quality and Acoustic Environment elements. • Air emissions and the ambient noise level are not expected to increase during operations. Infrastructure and • Access to St. Leon Station is via Secondary Highway 244 and local access roads. The Services CN Railway is located approximately 6 km north of the existing pump station. Power utilities currently service the existing site, and waste management facilities are available at the town of Manitou and in Thompson County (Province of Manitoba 2000h). • Various services are provided in Manitou and Somerset including accommodation, restaurants, recreational facilities and emergency services (i.e., police, ambulance, and fire). A hospital is located in Manitou (Province of Manitoba 2000i,j). Employment and • In 2001, the town of Somerset had a 49.3% participation rate in the labour force with an Economy employment rate of 49.3% and an unemployment rate of 0% (Statistics Canada 2006f). • In 2001, the town of Manitou had a 60% participation rate in the labour force with an employment rate of 58.5% and an unemployment rate of 0% (Statistics Canada 2006ff).

February 2007 4663 Page 5-159

4663_FIG_5-24_STLEON.mxd 5464000 5465000 5466000 5467000 5468000 31 524000 524000 30 6 IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE ¾À 242 525000 525000

M 32

M 29 5

C 526000 526000

ST. LEON LEON ST.

P STATION

B 527000 527000

A IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE IMAGERY NOT AVAILABLE 33 28 4 528000 528000 aboss re er si s o b La ake k La 34 27

T 3

T 529000 529000

. St. Leon St.

MILE 50W

W ake La on Le

1 . t S

1 530000 530000

5464000 5465000 5466000 5467000 5468000 Although there is no reason to believe that there a there believe that to Althoughreason isno there data used to generate this product or in produc the dataproduct this generate used to Municipalities, Populated Places, Parks and Parks Places, Protect Populated Municipalities, ALBERTA District Boundaries: Ensight DistrictInformationServices, Boundaries: MONTANA SOUTHERN LIGHTSPROJECT Road: GeoBase®, Government of Canada, of 2006. Road: Government GeoBase®, UNITED STATES TERRITORIES NORTHWEST Hydrography: Government of Hydrography:Government 2006 Manitoba, ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC. advised that errors in the data may be present. may errors be inadvised data that the REGIONAL LOCATIONOF CANADA Imagery: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Imagery:EnbridgePipelines ST.LEONSTATION UTM GRID: Zone 14, NAD 83. UTMGRID:NAD 14, Zone SASKATCHEWAN (SW 33-4-9 WPM) Parkand Protected Area MunicipalDistrict County / Line MunicipalBoundary Road ProposedLSr Pipeline FIGURE5.24 LEGEND 4663 (AllLocations Approximate) .50.5 0.25 0 NORTH DAKOTA NORTH SCALE: 1:20,000 re any errors associated with the the associated rewith any errors NUNAVUT t itself, users of these data are itself, t these data users of ed Areas: ESRIed 2005. MANITOBA February 2007 2006 ST.LEON km Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

5.2.23 Gretna Station (SE 8-1-1 WPM) Project activities at the Gretna Station include piping modifications, installation of a new DRA skid as part of the Line 13 reversal project component. Activities associated with the Line 2 modifications project component include installation of a new DRA skid.

SUMMARY OF BIOPHYSICAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ELEMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE GRETNA STATION MODIFICATIONS

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Physical Environment • Gretna Station lies within the Red River Plain Subdivision of the Manitoba Lowland Physiographic Region (Barto and Vogel 1978). • The site is underlain by the Amaranth, Reston and Melita formations of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. The Amaranth Formation is composed of red argillaceous dolomitic siltstone and sandstone; the Reston Formation consists of limestone, dolomite, shale; the Melita Formation consists of sandstone, shale, limestone (Manitoba Geological Survey 2006a). • There are no areas of permafrost in the vicinity of Gretna Station (NRC 2006a). • There are no documented major earthquakes, landslides or avalanches in the vicinity of the site (NRC 2006b,c,d). • The topography in the area of Gretna Station is level and the elevation is approximately 250 m asl. • The site encounters alluvial sediments composed of sand and gravel, sand, silt, clay, organic detritus, channel and overbank sediments, which were reworked by existing rivers and deposited primarily as bars (Manitoba Geological Survey 2006b). • The modifications to Gretna Station will be undertaken within an existing pump station site. Possible sources of soil contamination include spot spills and leaks that may have occurred during past onsite activities Gretna Station is listed in the Manitoba Contaminated Sites List (Manitoba Conservation 2002, Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2006). • The pump station area is one of the warmest and most humid regions of the Canadian prairies (Environment Canada 2006b). Soil Capability • The modifications to Gretna Station will be undertaken within an existing fenced industrial site lacking topsoil and, therefore, detailed soil information is not deemed warranted as per Table A-3 of the Filing Manual. • See Physical Environment for potential contaminated soil. Water Quality and • The surface waters in the vicinity of Gretna Station form part of the Riviere Aux Quantity Marais/Plum River Watershed of the Red River Basin (Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). • No watercourses lie within 30 m of Gretna Station. The nearest watercourse to the site is an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek, which is located approximately 350 m northwest of the site. • Enbridge has an existing groundwater monitoring system in place at Gretna Station to monitor groundwater quality and quantity. Any ground disturbance associated with the modifications at the site will be limited to shallow depths and are not expected to impact groundwater quality. Contaminants of concern associated with the modifications that may affect water quality, if spilled or leaked, include crude oil, diesel fuel, lubricants and hydraulic fluids. • There are no wells located in the vicinity of Gretna Station (Manitoba Water Stewardship 2006). Activities associated with the modifications to Gretna Station are not anticipated to have any effects on well water quantity or quality. • Rental fluids will be used for hydrostatic testing. In the unlikely event that Enbridge will withdraw water for hydrostatic testing, they will follow all applicable provincial regulations.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-161

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Air Quality • Air quality in the vicinity of the pump station is primarily a function of anthropogenic sources of emissions such as those arising from vehicle and rail traffic on adjacent roads and railways and from equipment used for farming. • Gretna Station is located approximately 500 m north of the town of Gretna. The nearest residence is located 500 m west of the site. • The modifications to Gretna Station will not result in an increase in measurable airborne emissions during operations or maintenance since the pumps are electrically driven. Acoustic Environment • Current sources of noise emissions in the area surrounding Gretna Station are from vehicle and rail traffic on adjacent roads and railways and from equipment used for farming. • Gretna Station is located approximately 500 m north of the town of Gretna, Manitoba. The nearest residence is located 500 m west of the site. • The modifications to Gretna Station will not result in an increase in the ambient noise level during operations Fish and Fish Habitat • The activities associated with the modifications to Gretna Station will not impact fish or fish habitat. • The nearest potential fish-bearing watercourse is an unnamed tributary to Buffalo Creek, which is located approximately 350 m northwest of the site. Wetlands • There are no natural waterbodies within 2 km of the site. • There are no wetlands within 30 m of the pump station. Vegetation • Gretna Station is located within the Lake Manitoba Plain Ecoregion of the Prairie Ecozone (Environment Canada 2006b). • The site is located within an existing disturbed and fenced industrial area devoid of vegetation and, therefore, detailed vegetation information is not deemed warranted as per Table A-3 of the Filing Manual. Wildlife and Wildlife • Gretna Station is not located within or near any National Wildlife Areas or Provincial Habitat Wildlife Management Areas, Wildlife Refuges, Migratory Bird Sanctuaries, Important Bird Areas, Ramsar wetlands or World Biosphere Reserves (Environment Canada 2006d, Important Bird Areas of Canada 2006, Bureau of the Convention on Wetlands 2006, UNESCO 2006, Government of Manitoba 2006b, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). • The modifications at Gretna Station will occur within an existing large, previously disturbed industrial site, which is not considered to be suitable wildlife habitat. No impacts to wildlife or wildlife habitat are expected to occur as a result of the pump station modifications. Species at Risk or • The modifications at Gretna Station will occur within an existing large, previously Species of Special disturbed industrial site, which is not considered suitable habitat for wildlife or plant Status species at risk. Nevertheless, depending on the surrounding land use, construction activities at the site could disturb wildlife SARA-listed species within 500 m of the pump station. Cactus Gretna Station lies within the home range of the following SARA-listed species: eastern wolf (Canis lupus lycaon); grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus); least bittern (Ixobrychus exilis); Sprague's pipit (Anthus spragueii); yellow rail (Coturnicops noveboracensis); northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens); and monarch (Danaus plexippus) (Environment Canada 2006c). Considering lands within 500 m of the site are cultivated, the potential for SARA-listed species to be disturbed by construction activities is low. • A search of the Manitoba CDC database did not indicate any plant or wildlife species of concern in the vicinity of the pump station (Manitoba CDC 2006b).

February 2007 4663 Page 5-162

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Human Occupancy • Since the early 1960s, lands at the site have been used as a pipeline facility. and Resource Use • The existing Gretna Station is situated on lands owned by Enbridge. Adjacent lands are privately-owned and are primarily used for farming. The site is located on lands administered by the RM of Rhineland No. 164 that have been zoned as Restricted Agricultural (RM of Rhineland 1990). The proposed facilities are compatible with zoning at this site. • The pump station does not encounter: rural or urban residential areas; Indian Reserves or Aboriginal communities; recreation and park areas; lands under Parks Canada jurisdiction or conservation areas, controlled or managed forest areas; water reserves and licenses or water intakes or land and water based transportation infrastructure. The pump station is not adjacent to any Environmentally Significant Areas, proposed or existing parks, Ecological Reserves, Provincial Recreation Areas, designated Wilderness or Natural Areas (INAC 2006, Government of Manitoba 2006b, Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives 2006). The International Biological Program is no longer active. • The pump station is situated within an existing industrial site on private lands next to several roads and, as such, it is unlikely that any hunting and guiding occurs next to the pump station. All hunters require permission from the landowner. • Due to the large proportion of land in private ownership and under industrial use and cultivation surrounding the pump station, recreational use of the lands around this location is limited. There are no provincial parks, recreation areas or environmentally significant areas in close proximity to the site. • There are no wells located in the vicinity of Gretna Station (Manitoba Water Stewardship 2006). • The modifications at Gretna Station will entail the construction of a new building and above-ground pipes which may be considered an aesthetic impact. Heritage Resources • Since Gretna Station is located within a highly disturbed industrial site stripped of topsoil, the potential for historical resources is considered negligible. Traditional Land and • Given that the modifications at Gretna Station will be undertaken in an industrial area on Resource Use patented lands, traditional use of the lands in the vicinity of the pump station is not anticipated to be affected by the construction or operation of the proposed facilities. Social and Cultural • The Town of Gretna is located approximately 500 m south of Gretna Station. In 2001, it Well-Being had a population of 563. Approximately 30% of the population is between 25 and 44 years old which represents the largest age demographic. The median age of the population is 26.9 years. The town had a workforce of 290 in 2001. The main industries in the city include manufacturing and construction, health and education, and wholesale and retail trade (Statistics Canada 2006j) • The Town of Altona is located approximately 10 km north of Gretna Station. In 2001, it had a population of 3,434. Approximately 25% of the population is between 25 and 44 years old which represents the largest age demographic. The median age of the population is 38.4 years. The town had a workforce of 1,695 in 2001. The main industries in the city include health and education, manufacturing and construction services, wholesale and retail trade, and business services (Statistics Canada 2006i). • The modifications will entail a small workforce using the services of the surrounding communities over a short period. Human Health • Nuisance air and noise emissions will be associated with the construction of Gretna Station. The effects of these nuisance emissions are discussed under Air Quality and Acoustic Environment elements. • Air emissions and the ambient noise level are not expected to increase during operations.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-163

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Biophysical and Socio-Economic Elements Summary of Considerations Infrastructure and • Highways 30, 524 and 243 and Main Street (in Gretna) provide access to Gretna Services Station. No new infrastructure will be required. The CP Railway traverses the existing pump station site. Power utilities currently service the existing site, and waste management facilities are available within the town of Altona, approximately 10 km north of the site (Province of Manitoba 2000k). • Various services are provided in Gretna including restaurants and emergency services (i.e., police, ambulance and fire). Hospitals, accommodation and recreational facilities are located in Altona (Province of Manitoba 2000l,m). Employment and • In 2001, the town of Gretna had a 74% participation rate in the labour force with an Economy employment rate of 74% and an unemployment rate of 0% (Statistics Canada 2006j). • In 2001, the town of Altona had a 63.5% participation rate in the labour force with an employment rate of 61.9% and an unemployment rate of 2.6% (Statistics Canada 2006i).

February 2007 4663 Page 5-164

603000 604000 605000 606000 607000 608000

16 15 18 17 IIMMAAGGEERRYY NNOOTT AAVVAAIILLAABBLLEE

FIGURE 5.25 TWP. 1, RGE. 1 WPM ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC. 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 2 SOUTHERN LIGHTS PROJECT 3 3

4 RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF RHINELAND 4 5 5 REGIONAL LOCATION OF ¾À243 GRETNA STATION (SE 8-1-1 WPM)

LEGEND Proposed LSr Pipeline

Road 243 ¾À Municipal Boundary 0 0 0 0

0 100 Municipal District / County Line 1 9 1 3 8 3 4 7 4 5 5 Park and Protected Area GRETNA STATION

¾À30 NORTHWEST NUNAVUT TERRITORIES 243 MILE 1N ¾À 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 4 4 5 5 Town of ALBERTA MANITOBA Gretna SASKATCHEWAN

4 6 5

GRETNA 0 0

0 0 CANADA 0 0 9 9 2 2 4 4 5 5 UNITED STATES MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA ¾À30 CANADA UTM GRID: Zone 14, NAD 83. Imagery: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Road: GeoBase®, Government of Canada, 2006. Hydrography: Government of Manitoba, 2006 District Boundaries: Ensight Information Services, 2006 UNITED STATES Municipalities, Populated Places, Parks and Protected Areas: ESRI 2005. Although there is no reason to believe that there are any errors associated with the data used to generate this product or in the product itself, users of these data are advised that errors in the data may be present. IIMMAAGGEERRYY NNOOTT AAVVAAIILLAABBLLEE

0 0 SCALE: 1:20,000 0 0 0 0

8 8 km 2 2

4 4 0 0.25 0.5 5 5 (All Locations Approximate)

603000 604000 605000 606000 607000 608000 4663 February 2007

4663_FIG_5-25_GRETNA.mxd Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

5.3 Line 13 Valve Sites This subsection describes the environmental and socio-economic setting at six existing valves along Line 13 right-of-way where work will be required as part of the proposed Line 13 reversal (Table 5.42). The environmental and socio-economic setting for the existing Enbridge pump stations where permanent facilities for Line 13 reversal are proposed are described in Section 5.2.

TABLE 5.42

SUMMARY OF BIOPHYSICAL ELEMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE LINE 13 VALVE SITES

Soil Type / Waterbody Vegetation Historic / Topsoil within 30 m (Habitat Type; Wildlife and Archaeological Location Site Surficial present of Site? Clearing Wildlife Site present (KP) description Geology (Yes/No) (Yes/No) Required) Habitat (Yes/No) 660.9 Existing glaciolacustrine No - site is No Aspen Parkland Agricultural No fenced and plain fenced and Subregion. No land use, gravelled gravelled vegetation, limited wildlife valve site. therefore effective habitat potential wildlife habitat is limited. 890.6 Existing ridged moraine No - site is No Aspen Parkland Agricultural No fenced and fenced and Subregion. No land use, gravelled gravelled vegetation, limited wildlife valve site. therefore effective habitat potential wildlife habitat is limited. 937.9 Existing morainal plain No - site is No Aspen Parkland Agricultural No fenced and fenced and Subregion. No land use, gravelled gravelled vegetation, limited wildlife valve site. therefore effective habitat potential wildlife habitat is limited. 1200.2 Existing glaciolacustrine No - site is No Aspen Parkland Agricultural No fenced and fenced and Subregion. No land use, gravelled gravelled vegetation, limited wildlife valve site. therefore effective habitat potential wildlife habitat is limited. 1213.5 Existing glaciolacustrine No - site is No Lake Manitoba Agricultural No fenced and fenced and Plain Subregion. land use, gravelled gravelled No vegetation, limited wildlife valve site. therefore effective habitat potential wildlife habitat is limited.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-166

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

5.4 References

5.4.1 Personal Communications Barry, D. Clerk. Belmont Waste Disposal. Belmont, Manitoba.

Bauldic, D. Administrator. Rural Municipality of Glenwood. Souris, Manitoba.

Beutler, J. Administrative Assistant. RM of Silverwood No. 123. Whitewood, Saskatchewan.

Colpits, L. Chief Executive Officer. Manitoba Habitat Heritage Corporation. Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Friesen, C. Clerk. Morden-Stanley-Thompson-Winkler Planning District. Morden, Manitoba.

Ginault, V. Administrator, RM of Heart’s Hill No. 352. Luseland, Saskatchewan.

Gordon, D. Clerk. RM of Argyle Waste Disposal. Baldur, Manitoba.

Graham, K. Conservation Programs Specialist, Ducks Unlimited. Brandon, Manitoba.

Greggor, J.. Administrator, RM of Pipestone No. 162. Reston, Manitoba.

Hicks, R. Administrator. RM of Dufferin No. 190. Bethune, Saskatchewan.

Hoff, J. Administrator. RM of Chester No. 125. Glenavon, Saskatchewan.

Howard, A. Development Officer. County of Camrose. Camrose, Alberta.

Hoyland B., Agricultural Fieldman, Flagstaff County. Sedgewick, Alberta

Johnson, G. Administrator, RM of Oakdale No. 320. Coleville, Saskatchewan.

Johnston, G. Administrator. RM of Francis No. 127. Francis, Saskatchewan.

Jones, G.A. Director of Parks and Natural Areas, Manitoba Conservation. Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Klippenstein, R. Chief Administrative Officer. Rural Municipality of Stanley. Morden, Manitoba.

Martin, K. Administrator, RM of Mountainview No. 318. Herschel, Saskatchewan.

Morris, T. Species at Risk Research Biologist, DFO. Burlington, Ontario.

Plaetnick, E. Administrator. Rural Municipality Of South Cypress. Glenboro, Manitoba.

Romano, S. Database Manager, Manitoba Water Stewardship. Brandon, Manitoba.

Somers, I. Field Crew Leader for Enbridge Southern Lights, Applied Aquatic Research Ltd. Calgary, Alberta

Smith, D. Senior Environmental Engineer, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Edmonton, Alberta.

Stronski, N. Administrator. RM of Loreburn No. 254. Loreburn, Saskatchewan.

Twardy, A. Soil Specialist, Mentiga Pedology Consultants Ltd. Edmonton, Alberta.

VanderMeulen, M. Aquatic Ecologist, Applied Aquatic Research Ltd. Calgary, Alberta.

Wagman, S. Administrator, RM of Edenwold, Edenwold, Saskatchewan.

Walcer, R. Senior Technologist. Saskatchewan Watershed Authority. Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan.

Wiebe, J. Chief Administrative Officer. Village of Gretna. Gretna, Manitoba.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-167

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Wilcox, Douglas. Manager, Program Development - Insurance, Research Division. Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation - Insurance. Portage la Prairie, Manitoba.

Winchester, L. Administrator. RM of Craik No. 222. Craik, Saskatchewan.

5.4.2 Literature Cited ACI Acoustical Consultants Inc. 2006. Environmental Noise Survey and Impact Assessment for Southern Access Project Expansion Phases 2A & 2B. Prepared for Enbridge Pipelines Inc. by ACI Acoustical Consultants Inc., December, 2006.

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 2004. Major Basins Map. Website: http://agr.gc.ca/pfra/gis/maps/maj_bas_e.pdf. Accessed: October 2006.

Agriculture Canada. 1985. The Soils of Chester Rural Municipality No. 125, Saskatchewan Agriculture.

Agriculture Canada. 1986. The Soils of Francis Rural Municipality No. 127, Saskatchewan Agriculture.

Alberta Community Development. 2001. Environmentally Significant Areas of Alberta. 1:1,500,000 map. Parks and Protected Areas Division.

Alberta Community Development. 2005. Parks and Protected Areas (including Crown Reservations). 1:1,000,000 map. Parks and Protected Areas Division.

Alberta Community Development. 2005. Protected Areas. Website: http://www.cd.gov.ab.ca/ preserving/parks/lrm/index.asp

Alberta Energy and Utilities Board. 2007. EUB Noise Directive 038. Website: http://www.eub.ca/docs/documents/directives/Directive038.pdf.

Alberta Environment. 2000. Code of Practice for Pipelines and Telecommunication Lines Crossing a Water Body and Code of Practice for Watercourse Crossings. Camrose Management Area Map. 1:500,000 map sheet. Website: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/water/legislation/COP/maps/Camrose.pdf, Accessed: November 2006.

Alberta Environment. 2006a. Alberta River Basins. Website: http://www3.gov.ab.ca/env/water/basins/BasinForm.cfm?Basins=4. Accessed: October 2006

Alberta Environment. 2006b. Ground Water Information System. Water Wells. Website: http://www.telusgeomatics.com/tgpub/ag_water/. Accessed: November 2006.

Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre. 2006. Project-specific element occurrence data search report. Conducted by J. Rintoul, Section Head and Information Coordinator, Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre, Alberta Community Development. Edmonton, Alberta. November 7, 2006.

Applied Aquatic Research Ltd. 2007. Fish Population and Riverine Habitat Inventories at Watercourse Crossings Proposed Enbridge Southern Lights Project. Prepared for: TERA Environmental Consultants. Calgary, Alberta.

Assiniboine Delta Aquifer Technical Advisory Group. 2005. Assiniboine Delta Aquifer Management Plan. Available at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/waterstewardship/reports/acquifer/assiniboine_delta_aquifer- mgmt_plan.pdf. Accessed: December 2006.

Banfield, A.W.F. 1974.The Mammals of Canada. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

Barkworth, M. E., K. M. Capels, L. Anderton, S. Long and M.B. Piep. 2006. Grass Manual on the Web. Utah State University. Logan, UT. Website: http://herbarium.usu.edu/webmanual/default.htm

February 2007 4663 Page 5-168

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Barto, W.P. and C.G. Vogel. 1978. Agro-Manitoba Information Package. Manitoba Department of Mines, Natural Resources and Environment: Lands and Surveys Division, Winnipeg.

Behler, J.L. and F.W. King. 1979. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Reptiles and Amphibians. Chanticleer Press, New York.

Betcher, R., G. Grove and C. Pupp. 1995. Groundwater in Manitoba: Hydrogeology, Quality Concerns, Management. NHRI Contribution No. CS-93017. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

Bureau of the Convention on Wetlands. 2006. The Ramsar List: The List of Wetlands of International Importance. Website: http://ramsar.org/. Accessed: November 2006.

Canada Land Inventory. 1966a. Soil capability for Agriculture. 62F, Virden. 1;250,000.

Canada Land Inventory. 1966b. Soil capability for Agriculture. 62G, Brandon. 1;250,000.

Canada Land Inventory. 1966c. Soil capability for Agriculture. 62H, Winnipeg. 1;250,000.

Canada Land Inventory. 1970a. Land capability for wildlife-ungulates. 62F. Virden. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1970b. Land capability for wildlife-waterfowl. 62F. Virden. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1970c. Land capability for wildlife-waterfowl. 62G. Brandon. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1971a. Land capability for recreation. 62F, Virden. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1971b. Land capability for recreation. 62G, Brandon. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1973a. Land capability for wildlife-waterfowl. 62H. Winnipeg. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1973b. Land capability for recreation. 62H, Winnipeg. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1974a. Land capability for wildlife-ungulates. 62G. Brandon. 1:250,000 map.

Canada Land Inventory. 1974b. Land capability for wildlife-ungulates. 62H. Winnipeg. 1:250,000 map.

Canadian Heritage Rivers System. 2006. The Rivers. Website: http://www.chrs.ca/Rivers_e.htm. Accessed: November 2006.

Canadian Nature Federation. 2006. Important Bird Areas. Website: http://www.bsc- eoc.org/iba/canmap.jsp. Accessed: November 2006.

Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES). 2007. SPOT 5 Satellite Imagery. Licensed by Iunctus Geomatics Corporation. Lethbridge, Alberta.

City of Regina. 2006. Urban Planning, Zoning Bylaws. Website: http://www.regina.ca/content/info_services/urban_planning/zoning.shtml. Accessed: November 2006.

Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 2006. Canadian species at risk. Website: http://www.cosewic.gc.ca/eng/sct0/index_e.cfm.

Cowardin, L.M., Carter, V., Golet, F.C., and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. Office of Biological Services, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. 103p.

Cypress Planning District. 1981.The Cypress Planning District Development Plan.

DMTI Spatial Inc. 2005. ESRI Data and Maps. Canadian Municipalities: ESRI Redlands, California, USA

February 2007 4663 Page 5-169

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Douglas, G., (G.B. Straley), D. Meidinger and J. Pojar. 1998-2002. Illustrated Flora of British Columbia. Volumes 1-8. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management and Ministry of Forests. Province of British Columbia.

Ellis, J.G., D.F. Acton and J.S. Clayton. 1965. The Soils of Regina Map Area. Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology.

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. 1999. Environmental Setting Report.

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. 2005. Aerial Imagery along Southern Lights Project right-of-way.

Ensight Information Services. 2006. Hydrography. Website: www.ihs.com/energy

Environment Canada. 2000. National Climate Data and Information Archive. Canadian Climate Normals. Website: http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/stnselect_e.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Environment Canada. 2006a. Archived HYDAT Hydrometric Data. Water Survey of Canada. Website: http://www.wsc.ec.gc.ca/hydat/h20/. Downloaded November 8 and 9, 2006.

Environment Canada. 2006b. Narrative Descriptions of Terrestrial Ecozones and Ecoregions of Canada. Website: http://www.ec.gc.ca/soer-ree/English/Framework/NarDesc/canada_e.cfm. Accessed: November 2006.

Environment Canada. 2006c. Species at Risk. Website: http://www.speciesatrisk.gc.ca/search/default_e.cfm. Accessed: November 2006.

Environment Canada. 2006d. Hinterland Who’s Who - Migratory Bird Sanctuaries. Website: http://www.hww.ca/hww2.asp?pid=0&cid=4&id=231. Accessed: November 2006.

Environment Canada. 2006e. Archived Sediment Data. Water Survey of Canada. Website: http://www.wsc.ec.gc.ca/sedat/sedflo/index_e.cfm?cname=main_e.cfm. Accessed November 2006.

Fedirchuk, G. 1997. Historical Resources Overview Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program. Department of Tourism, Recreation & Cultural Affairs, Historic Resources Branch, Winnipeg.

Ferguson, R.S. and H.M. Hunt. 1981. Terrestrial wildlife habitat inventory of the North Battleford (73-C) map area. Saskatchewan Department of Parks and Renewable Resources. Wildlife Technical Report 81-10. 186 pp.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada. 2004. Canadian Waters Guidelines and Factsheets. Website: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/canwaters-eauxcan/infocentre/guidelines-conseils/index_e.asp. Accessed: November 2006.

Flora of North America Editorial Committee, Eds. 1993+. Flora of North America North of Mexico. 7+ vols. New York and Oxford. Website: http://www.fna.org

Flory, P.M. 1980. Terrestrial wildlife habitat inventory of the Regina (72-I) map area. Saskatchewan Department of Parks and Renewable Resources, Wildlife Technical Report 80-1. 178 pp.

Geo-Engineering (M.S.T.) Ltd. 1997. Report on Geotechnical Route Evaluation for the Interprovincial Pipeline Inc Terrace Phase I Expansion Program.

Geological Survey of Canada and Manitoba Minerals Division. 1994. Geological Highway Map of Manitoba. 1:1,000,000.

Godfrey, W. Earl. 1986. The Birds of Canada, Revised Edition. National Museum of Natural Sciences, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-170

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Gorham, L. 1998. Heritage Resources Impact Assessment Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program. Permit A27-98. Department of Tourism, Recreation & Cultural Affairs, Historic Resources Branch, Winnipeg.

Government of Canada. 1986. Canada: Wetland Regions. National Atlas of Canada 5th Edition. Map.

Government of Canada. 2006. 1:250,000 NTS Maps.

Government of Canada. 2006. The National Road Network, Canada, Level 1 (NRNC1) GeoBase®, Website: www.geobase.ca

Government of Manitoba. 2006. Manitoba's Network of Protected Areas. 1:1,125,000 map.

Government of Manitoba. 2006a. Municipality Profiles. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/csd/. Accessed: November 2006.

Government of Manitoba. 2006b. Manitoba's Network of Protected Areas. 1:1,125,000 map.

Hamilton, W.N., M.C. Price and C.W. Langenberg (compilers). 1999. Geological map of Alberta. Alberta Geological Survey, Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Map No. 236. 1:1,000,000 map.

Hart, R.T. and H. M. Hunt. 1981. Terrestrial wildlife habitat inventory of the Rosetown (72-O) map area. Saskatchewan Department of Parks and Renewable Resources, Wildlife Technical Report 81-3. 172 pp.

Important Bird Areas of Canada. 2006. Canadian IBA On-Line Directory. Website: http://www.ibacanada.com/sites.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2006. Map of First Nations in Saskatchewan. Website: http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/sk/fnmap_e.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Jones, G. and N. Armstrong. 2001. Long-term trends in total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentrations in Manitoba streams. Water Quality Management Section, Water Branch, Manitoba Conservation, Winnipeg, MB. Manitoba Conservation Report No. 2001-07. 154 pp.

Kershaw, L., J. Gould, D. Johnson and J. Lancaster. 2001. Rare Vascular Plants of Alberta. University of Alberta Press, Edmonton, Alberta. 484 pp.

Leitch, J.A. and L.E. Danielson, 1979. Social, Economic and Institutional Incentives to Drain or Preserve Prairie Wetlands, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Minnesota. St. Paul, 78p.

Leitch, J.A., 1981. The wetlands and drainage controversy - revisited, Minnesota Agricultural Economist No. 626. University of Minnesota, St. Paul, 5p.

Lombard North Group. 2002a. Dennis County Planning District Development Plan.

Lombard North Group. 2002b. Rural Municipality of Sifton Zoning By-Law No. 1325.

Lombard North Group. 2003. Pembina Manitou Planning District Development Plan 2015.

Lombard North Group. 2004. South Central Planning District Development Plan 2016.

Looman, J. and K.F. Best. 1987. Budd's flora of the Canadian Prairie Provinces. Research Branch Publication 1662. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. 863 pp.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2000a. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Argyle No. 102. Program Manual. Section 40-10-005.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2000b. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Oakland No. 157. Program Manual. Section 40-60-004.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-171

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2000c. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Pembina No. 161. Program Manual. Section 40-60-010.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2000d. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Pipestone No. 162. Program Manual. Section 40-60-013.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2000e. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Sifton No. 184. Program Manual. Section 40-80-006.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2001. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Lorne No. 144. Program Manual. Section 40-50-002.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2003.Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of South Cypress No. 190. Program Manual. Section 40-80-009.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2004. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Glenwood No. 131. Program Manual. Section 40-40-002.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2005. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Stanley No. 190. Program Manual. Section 40-80-012.

Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation. 2006. Soils productivity rating map of the Rural Municipality of Rhineland No. 164. Program Manual. Section 40-60-016.

Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2004. Weed District Map and Weed Supervisor Contact Information. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/contact/weeddistricts/. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Agriculture, Food and Rural Initiatives. 2006. Agri-Maps Map Viewer. Website: http://geoapp2.gov.mb.ca/website/mafri/index3.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation Data Centre. 2006a. Species and Plant Community Database Search. Website: http://web2.gov.mb.ca/conservation/cdc/species/index.php.

Manitoba Conservation Data Centre. 2006b. Project-specific element occurrence search report. Conducted by Nicole Firlotte, Biodiversity Information Manager, Manitoba Conservation. Winnipeg, Manitoba. November 9, 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 1986a. Bedrock Aquifers data. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/adminbnd/index.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 1986b. Sand and Gravel Aquifers data. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/adminbnd/index.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2002. Manitoba Sites List. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/regoperations/contams/manitoba_sites_list_sept2002.html. Accessed November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2003. Parks and Natural Areas. Natural Regions of Manitoba data. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/adminbnd/index.html.

Manitoba Conservation. 2005. Gross Watersheds: Hydrometric Stations data. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/water_resources/gross_watershed_index.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2006a. State of the Environment Reports. Natural Regions. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/annual-report/soe-reports/soe91/regions.html. Accessed November 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-172

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Manitoba Conservation. 2006b. Environment Act Licence: Town of Morden. Revised March 7, 2006. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/envapprovals/news/index.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2006c. Fish Fact Sheets. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/fish. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2006d. Manitoba 2006 Hunting Guide. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/wildlife/hunting/index.html. Accessed: December 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2006e. Manitoba 2006/2007 Trapping Guide. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/wildlife/trapping/index.html. Accessed: December 2006.

Manitoba Conservation. 2006f. Manitoba 2006 Angler's Guide. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/conservation/fish/images/05guide.pdf. Accessed: December 2006

Manitoba Department of Conservation, Wildlife. 2000. Big Game Hunting Areas Administrative Boundary. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/adminbnd/index.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Department of Energy and Mines. 1981. Surficial geological Map of Manitoba. Mineral Resources Division, Map 81-1. 1:1,000,000.

Manitoba Energy and Mines. 1988a Aggregate Resources Compilation Map Series, Map AR88-1-2, Winnipeg 62H. 1:250,000 map.

Manitoba Energy and Mines. 1988b. Aggregate Resources Compilation Map Series, Map AR88-1-3, Brandon 62G. 1:250,000 map.

Manitoba Energy and Mines. 1988c. Aggregate Resources Compilation Map Series, Map AR88-1-4, Virden 62F. 1:250,000 map.

Manitoba Geological Survey. 2006a. Geological Map of Manitoba. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/iedm/mrd/geo/gis/geoscimaps.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Geological Survey. 2006b. Surficial Geology Compilation Map Series. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/iedm/mrd/geo/gis/surfgeomap.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Industry, Economic Development and Mines. 2006. Mineral Dispositions Map. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/iedm/mrd/geo/gis/index.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation. 2006. Search of Crown Land Registry.

Manitoba Land Initiative. 2006. Soil - Land Cover and Surficial Geology data. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/adminbnd/index.html.

Manitoba Mineral Resources Division. 1979. Geological Map of Manitoba. Website: https://web2.gov.mb.ca/mli/geology/index_1million.html.

Manitoba Science, Technology, Energy and Mines. 2006. Land Information - Lease in Good Standing. Website: http://www.gov.mb.ca/iedm/petroleum/landinfo/goodstand.html. Accessed: November 2006.

Manitoba Water Stewardship. 2006. GWDrill Water Well Database. Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Mentiga Pedology Consultants Ltd. 1998. Deep Soil Investigations at Various Locations Between Regina and Gretna Along the Terrace Phase I Expansion Program.

Mentiga Pedology Consultants Ltd. 2006. Soil Investigations Along Re-Routes on the Proposed Southern Lights Project for Enbridge Pipelines Ltd.

Mentiga Pedology Consultants Ltd. and Genesis Environmental Ltd. 1997. Soil Survey and Reclamation Suitability Evaluation for the Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-173

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Millar, J.B. 1976. Wetland Classification in Western Canada: A Guide to Marshes and Shallow Open Water Wetlands in the Grasslands and Parklands of the Prairie Provinces. Report Series No. 37. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

Moss, E.H. 1983. Flora of Alberta. Second Edition. Revised by J.G. Packer. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario. 687 pp.

Municipal District of Provost. 2004. Land use Bylaw Part Five C-2157-97. Map No. 1. Updated to December 2004. Website: http://www.mdprovost.ca/pdf/landUse/map_1.pdf. Accessed: November 2006.

National Energy Board. 2004. Filing Manual. Calgary, Alberta.

Natural Resources Canada. 2005. Geoscientific insights into the Red River and its flood problem in Manitoba Geomorphology of the Red River. Website: http://gsc.nrcan.gc.ca/floods/ redriver/geomorphology_e.php. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2006a. Map of permafrost in Canada. Website: http://atlas.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/land/permafrost. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2006b. Map of major earthquakes in Canada. Website: http://atlas.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/naturalhazards/majorearthquakes. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2006c Earthquakes in Canada. Website: http://www.seismo.nrcan.gc.ca/eqinfo/caneqmap_e.php. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2006d. Map of major landslides in Canada. Website: http://atlas.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/naturalhazards/majorlandslides. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2006e. Map of major avalanches in Canada. Website: http://atlas.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/naturalhazards/majoravalanches. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2006f. Map of major floods in Canada. Website: http://atlas.nrcan.gc.ca/site/english/maps/environment/naturalhazards/majorfloods. Accessed: November 2006.

Natural Resources Canada. 2007. NTS Topographic Map Series. Canada 1:250,000. Ottawa.

NatureServe. 2006. Heritage Status: Global, National and Subnational Conservation Status Ranks. Website: http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?init=Species.

Oak Lake Aquifer Technical Advisory Group. 2000. Oak Lake Aquifer Management Plan. Available at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/waterstewardship/reports/acquifer/oak_lake.pdf. Accessed: December 2006.

Padbury, G.A. and Acton, D.F. 1998. Ecoregions of Saskatchewan. Agricultural and Agri food Canada, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Research Branch.

Pettapiece, W.W. 1986. Physiographic subdivisions of Alberta. Agriculture Canada. 1:1,500,000 map.

PFRA GIS & Hydrology Units. 2006. Major Basins of the PFRA Watershed Project data. Website: http://www.agr.gc.ca/pfra/gis/gwshed_e.htm.).

Poston, B., D.M. Ealey, P.S. Taylor and G.B. McKeating. 1990. Priority Migratory Bird Habitats of Canada's prairie provinces. Habitat Conservation Section, Canadian Wildlife Service, Conservation and protection, Western and Northern Region, Environment Canada, Edmonton. 107 pp.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-174

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Province of Manitoba. 2000a. Town of Virden Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4606034. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000b. City of Brandon Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4607062. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000c. Town of Souris Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4607053. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000d. Village of Wawanesa Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4607047. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000e. Village of Glenboro Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4607041. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000f. Village of Somerset Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4604066. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000g. Town of Morden Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4603053. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000h. City of Winkler Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4603050. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000i. Town of Altona Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4603040. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000j. Town of Gretna Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4603038. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000k. R.M. of Pipestone Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4606023. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000l. R.M. of Sifton Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4606015. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000m. Town of Virden Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4606034. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000n. City of Brandon Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4607062. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000o. Town of Souris Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4607053. Accessed: December 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-175

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Province of Manitoba. 2000p. Village of Wawanesa Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4607047. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000q. Village of Glenboro Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4607041. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000r. RM of Oakland Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4607045. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000s. RM of Thompson Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4603058. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000t City of Winkler Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4603050. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000u. Town of Altona Community Profile - Environment. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/environment.cgi?id=4603040. Accessed: December 2006.

Province of Manitoba. 2000v. Town of Manitou Community Profile - Community Overview. Website: http://www.communityprofiles.mb.ca/cgi-bin/csd/overview.cgi?id=4604035. Accessed: November 2006.

RL&L Environmental Services Ltd. 1998. Fisheries assessment for the IPL Terrace Phase I Expansion Program. Prepared for: TERA Environmental Consultants (Alta.) Ltd. RL&L Report No. 624F: 164 pp. + 4 app.

Royer, F. and R. Dickinson. 1999. Weeds of Canada and the Northern United States. Lone Pine Publishing and the University of Alberta Press. Edmonton, AB.

Rural Municipality of Argyle. 1971. The Pelican - Rock Lake District Planning Scheme.

Rural Municipality of Lorne. 2006. Rural Municipality of Lorne Zoning By-law.

Rural Municipality of Oakland. 2006. Rural Municipality of Oakland Zoning By-law.

Rural Municipality of Pembina. 2004. The Pembina Zoning By-law.

Rural Municipality of Pipestone. 2003. Rural Municipality of Pipestone Zoning By-law.

Rural Municipality of Rhineland. 1990. Rural Municipality of Rhineland Zoning By-law.

Saskatchewan Energy and Mines. 1997. Surficial geology map of Saskatchewan. 1: 1 000 000 scale.

Saskatchewan Energy and Mines. 1999. Geological map of Saskatchewan. 1:1,000,000 map.

Saskatchewan Environment. 2006. Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre. Website: http://gisweb1.serm.gov.sk.ca/imf/imf.jsp?config=http://gisweb1.serm.gov.sk.ca/imf/sk/sites/Wildlif e/Wildlife.xml. Accessed: October 2006.

Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology. 1992. The Soil of Craik Rural Municipality No. 222. University of Saskatchewan.

Saskatchewan Scrap Tire Corporation. 2006. Landfill List. Website:http://swa.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-176

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Saskatchewan Watershed Authority. 2006a. Assiniboine River Watershed Source Water Protection Plan. Website: http://www.swa.ca/Stewardship/WatershedPlanning/Default.asp. Accessed: November 2006.

Saskatchewan Watershed Authority. 2006b. Website: http://swa.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

Scott, W. B and Crossman, E.J. 1973. Freshwater Fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa

Shetsen, I. 1990. Quaternary geology, central Alberta. Alberta Research Council. 1:50,000 map

Statistics Canada. 2006a. Community Profile - Town of Virden, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 606034&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=virden&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006aa. Community Profiles - City of White City. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 706030&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=white%20city&SearchType=Begins&S earchPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: December 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006b. Community Profile - City of Brandon, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 607062&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=brandon&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006bb. Community Profiles - Village of Odessa, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 706006&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Odessa&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: October 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006c. Community Profile - Town of Souris, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 607053&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=souris&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006cc. Community Profiles - Village of Glenavon, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 705021&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Glenavon&SearchType=Begins&Sear chPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006d. Community Profile - Village of Wawanesa, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 607047&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=wawanesa&SearchType=Begins&Sea rchPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006dd. Community Profiles - Town of Kipling, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 705016&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Kipling&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=47&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: October 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006e. Community Profile - Village of Glenboro, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 607041&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=glenboro&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006ee. Community Profile for Kennedy, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 701077&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Kennedy&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=01&B1=All&GeoLevel=&GeoCode=4701077. Accessed: November 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-177

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Statistics Canada. 2006f. Community Profile - Village of Somerset, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 604066&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=somerset&SearchType=Begins&Sear chPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006ff. Community Profile for Manitou, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 604035&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=manitou&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=46&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006g. Community Profile - Town of Morden, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603053&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=morden&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006h. Community Profile - Town of Winkler, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603050&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=winkler&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006i. Community Profile - Town of Altona, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603040&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=altona&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006j. Community Profile - Village of Gretna, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603038&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=gretna&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006k. Community Profile - City of Edmonton, Alberta - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603038&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=gretna&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006l. Community Profile - City of Camrose, ALberta - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603038&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=gretna&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006m. Community Profile - Town of Daysland, Alberta- 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603038&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=gretna&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006n. Community profile - Town of Hardisty, Alberta - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 807048&Geo2=PR&Code2=48&Data=Count&SearchText=Hardisty&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=48&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: April 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006o. Community profile - Town of Provost, Alberta - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 807002&Geo2=PR&Code2=48&Data=Count&SearchText=Provost&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006p. Community profile - Village of Czar, Alberta - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 807004&Geo2=PR&Code2=48&Data=Count&SearchText=Czar&SearchType=Begins&SearchPR =01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-178

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Statistics Canada. 2006q. Community Profiles - Town of Macklin, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 713051&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=macklin&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006r. Community Profiles - Town of Kerrobert, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 713042&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Kerrobert&SearchType=Begins&Sear chPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006s. Community Profiles - Town of Rosetown, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 712006&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=rosetown&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006t. Community Profiles - Village of Milden, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 712012&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Milden&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=.Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006u. Community Profiles - Town of Outlook, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 711027&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Outlook&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006v. Community Profiles - Village of Loreburn, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 711021&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Loreburn&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=47&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006w. Community Profile for Gretna, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603038&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=gretna&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006w. Community Profiles - Town of Central Butte, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 707054&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Central%20Butte&SearchType=Begin s&SearchPR=47&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: October 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006x. Community Profile for Altona, Manitoba - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 603040&Geo2=PR&Code2=46&Data=Count&SearchText=altona&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006x. Community Profiles - Town of Craik, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 707092&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Craik&SearchType=Begins&SearchP R=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: October 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006y. Community Profiles - Village of Bethune, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 706061&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Bethune&SearchType=Begins&Searc hPR=47&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: November 2006.

Statistics Canada. 2006z. Community Profiles - City of Regina, Saskatchewan - 2001. Website: http://www12.statcan.ca/english/profil01/CP01/Details/Page.cfm?Lang=E&Geo1=CSD&Code1=4 706027&Geo2=PR&Code2=47&Data=Count&SearchText=Regina&SearchType=Begins&Search PR=01&B1=All&Custom=. Accessed: October 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-179

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Strathcona County. 1998. 1998 Strathcona County Municipal Development Plan Policy Areas Sherwood Park Urban Service Area Bylaw 38-98 Map 9.3. Website: http://webpub2.strathcona.ab.ca/NR/rdonlyres/e4yskuabtzugvmadnmr6n2i44evhamv73pihmwa7i gvqvmtdkiga5amimds3vk6siqray7mz67zn2gjknsr7yb5cjkf/Attachment-PDS-MDP-Section-9%2e0- USA-Industrial-Development-map-9%2e3.pdf. Accessed: November 2006.

Stuart, R.E. and H.A. Kantrud. 1971. Classification of Natural Ponds and Lakes in the Glaciated Prairie region. Resource Publication No. 92. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.

TERA Environmental Consultants (Alta.) Ltd. 1997. Environmental and Socio-economic Impact Assessment for the Proposed Interprovincial Pipeline Inc. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program. Prepared for Interprovincial Pipeline Inc.

TERA Environmental Consultants (Alta.) Ltd. 1998. Survey of Wildlife and Habitat along the route of the Interprovincial Pipeline Inc. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program. Prepared for: Interprovincial PipeLine Inc.

TERA Environmental Consultants. 2000. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program 2000 Post Construction Monitoring Report. Prepared for Enbridge Pipelines Inc.

TERA Environmental Consultants. 2001. Terrace Phase I Expansion Program 2001 Post Construction Monitoring Report. Prepared for Enbridge Pipelines Inc.

TERAGIS, TERA Environmental Consultants, 2006.

Tourism Saskatchewan. 2006. Website: http://www.sasktourism.com/default.asp. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Central Butte. 2006. Website: http://www.sasktelwebsite.net/centralb/services.htm. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Craik. 2006. Website: http://www.craik.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Hardisty. 2006. Website: http://www.hardisty.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Kerrobert. 2006. Website: http://www.kerrobertsk.com/. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Macklin. 2006. Website: http://www.macklin.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Morden. 2006 Website: http://www.mordenmb.com/. Accessed February 2007.

Town of Outlook. 2006. Website: http://www.town.outlook.sk.ca/PDFFOLDER/townmap.pdf. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Provost. 2006. Website: http://www.provost.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

Town of Rosetown. 2006. Website: http://www.rosetown.ca/. Accessed: November 2006.

Travel Manitoba. 2006. Accommodations. Website: http://www.travelmanitoba.com/default.asp?page=2&menu=436. Accessed: November 2006.

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat 2006. The Federal Contaminated Sites and Solid Waste Landfills Inventory. Website: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf/home- accueil.aspx?Language=EN&sid=wu111414528417. Accessed November, 2006.

Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. 2006. The Federal Contaminated Sites and Solid Waste Landfills Inventory. Website: http://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/fcsi-rscf/home- accueil.aspx?Language=EN&sid=wu111414528417. Accessed November 2006.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-180

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2006. Man and the Biosphere Biosphere Reserves Directory. Website: http://www.unesco.org/mab/wnbrs.shtml. Accessed: November 2006.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2006. Man and the Biosphere Reserves Directory. Website: http://www.unesco.org/mab/BRs/EurBRlist.shtml. Accessed: November 2006.

Village of Milden. 2006. Website: http://www.villageofmilden.com/services.htm. Accessed: November 2006.

Weller, M.W., 1981. Freshwater Marshes, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minn., 146p.

White, D.J. and K. L. Johnson. 1980. The Rare Vascular Plants of Manitoba. National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario.

Wild Rose Consulting Inc. 1998a. IPL's Terrace Phase I Expansion Program Rare Vascular Plant Survey, Saskatchewan and Manitoba Spring 1998. Prepared for TERA Environmental Consultants (Alta.) Ltd. on behalf of Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. (Enbridge Pipelines Inc.)

Wild Rose Consulting Inc. 1998b. IPL's Terrace Phase I Expansion Program Rare Vascular Plant Survey, Saskatchewan and Manitoba Summer 1998 (Part 1). Prepared for TERA Environmental Consultants (Alta.) Ltd. on behalf of Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. (Enbridge Pipelines Inc.)

Wild Rose Consulting Inc. 1998c. IPL's Terrace Phase I Expansion Program Rare Vascular Plant Survey, Saskatchewan and Manitoba Summer 1998 (Part 2). Prepared for TERA Environmental Consultants (Alta.) Ltd. on behalf of Interprovincial Pipe Line Inc. (Enbridge Pipelines Inc.)

Winkler Aquifer Technical Advisory Group. 1997. Winkler Aquifer Management Plan. Available at: http://www.gov.mb.ca/waterstewardship/reports/acquifer/winkler_aquifer_mp.pdf. Accessed: December 2006.

Woo, M., Rowsell, R.D., and R.G. Clark.1993. Hydrological Classification of Prairie Wetlands and Prediction of Wetland Inundation in Response to Climatic Variability. Occassional Paper. Number 79. Canadian Wildlife Service.

February 2007 4663 Page 5-181

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5A

HISTORICAL STREAMFLOW INFORMATION

February 2007 4663

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5A-1

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR THE SOURIS RIVER NEAR WAWANESA, MANITOBA (NW 26-7-17 WPM)

Discharge Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean Monthly 0.922 0.855 4.09 39.2 38.5 24.2 13.4 6.58 3.30 2.99 2.74 1.40 Max. Monthly 9.01 7.47 25.2 488 286 195 141 76.4 27.3 26.8 24.9 12.2 Min. Monthly 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.714 0.274 0.058 0.016 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Years of Streamflow Record: 1912 to 2005 Maximum Daily Discharge: 742 m3/s (April 11, 1976) (extreme recorded for the period of record) Minimum Daily Discharge: 0.00 m3/s (multiple dates) Drainage Area: 61,100 km2 Source: Environment Canada 2006a

FIGURE 5A-1

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR THE SOURIS RIVER NEAR WAWANESA, MANITOBA (NW 26-7-17 WPM)

600 /s) 3 500 Mean Monthly 400 Max. Monthly

300 Min. Monthly

200

100

Monthly Discharge (m 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Month

Plate 5A-1 View upstream of the Souris River near Wawanesa, Manitoba through proposed pipeline crossing (October 17, 2006).

February 2007 4663 Page 5A-1

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5A-2

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR OAK CREEK NEAR GLENBORO, MANITOBA (SW 21-6-13 WPM)

Discharge Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean Monthly - - 0.475 1.07 0.285 0.182 0.189 0.113 0.018 0.012 - - Max. Monthly - - 1.38 2.76 1.73 0.459 0.645 0.544 0.136 0.061 - - Min. Monthly - - 0.000 0.023 0.018 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 - - Years of Streamflow Record: 1986 to 1994 (during nonfrozen conditions only) Maximum Daily Discharge: 8.28m3/s (March 30, 1992) (extreme recorded for the period of record) Minimum Daily Discharge: 0.00 m3/s (multiple dates each year of record) Drainage Area: 493 km2 Source: Environment Canada 2006a

FIGURE 5A-2

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR OAK CREEK NEAR GLENBORO, MANITOBA (SW 21-6-13 WPM)

3 /s) 3 2.5 Mean Monthly 2 Max. Monthly

1.5 Min. Monthly

0.5

Monthly Discharge (m 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Month

Plate 5A-2 View of left bank approach of Oak Creek near Glenboro, Manitoba at proposed pipeline crossing (October 13, 2006).

February 2007 4663 Page 5A-2

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5A-3

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR THE CYPRESS RIVER NEAR BRUXELLES, MANITOBA (SW 4-6-11 WPM)

Discharge Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean Monthly - - 0.574 4.03 0.708 0.161 0.285 0.115 0.058 0.040 - - Max. Monthly - - 3.81 12.2 5.25 1.34 4.22 1.73 1.04 0.508 - - Min. Monthly - - 0.000 0.022 0.038 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 - - Years of Streamflow Record: 1965 to 2005 (during nonfrozen conditions only) Maximum Daily Discharge: 72.5 m3/s (April 12, 1969) (extreme recorded for the period of record) Minimum Daily Discharge: 0.00 m3/s (multiple dates) Drainage Area: 276 km2 Source: Environment Canada 2006a

FIGURE 5A-3

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR THE CYPRESS RIVER NEAR BRUXELLES, MANITOBA (SW 4-6-11 WPM)

14 /s) 3 12 Mean Monthly 10 Max. Monthly 8 Min. Montly 6 4 2

Monthly Discharge (m 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Month

Plate 5A-3 View downstream of the Cypress River near Bruxelles, Manitoba through proposed pipeline crossing (October 14, 2006).

February 2007 4663 Page 5A-3

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5A-4

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR MARY JANE CREEK AT LA RIVIERE, MANITOBA (SW 30-3-9 WPM)

Discharge Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean Monthly - - 0.180 1.57 0.301 0.068 0.072 0.065 0.032 0.017 - - Max. Monthly - - 1.60 4.76 1.93 0.343 0.413 0.944 0.311 0.068 - - Min. Monthly - - 0.000 0.000 0.019 0.009 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 - - Years of Streamflow Record: 1960 to 1982 (during nonfrozen conditions only) Maximum Daily Discharge: 32.0 m3/s (April 10, 1969) (extreme recorded for the period of record) Minimum Daily Discharge: 0.00 m3/s (multiple dates) Drainage Area: 136 km2 Source: Environment Canada 2006a

FIGURE 5A-4

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR MARY JANE CREEK AT LA RIVIERE, MANITOBA (SW 30-3-9 WPM)

5 /s) 3 4 Mean Monthly Max. Monthly 3 Min. Monthly 2

Monthly Discharge (m 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Month

Plate 5A-4 View southwest of Mary Jane Creek near La Riviere, Manitoba (May 15, 1998).

February 2007 4663 Page 5A-4

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5A-5

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR DEADHORSE CREEK AT MORDEN, MANITOBA (SW 8-3-5 WPM)

Discharge Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean Monthly - - 0.380 1.32 0.302 0.116 0.125 0.094 0.029 0.007 - - Max. Monthly - - 2.42 5.4 1.29 0.949 1.10 1.14 0.373 0.029 - - Min. Monthly - - 0.004 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - Years of Streamflow Record: 1966 to 1996 (during nonfrozen conditions only) Maximum Daily Discharge: 288 m3/s (April 20, 1979) (extreme recorded for the period of record) Minimum Daily Discharge: 0.00 m3/s (multiple dates) Drainage Area: 159 km2 Source: Environment Canada 2006a

FIGURE 5A-5

HISTORICAL MEAN MONTHLY STREAMFLOW (m3/s) SUMMARY FOR DEADHORSE CREEK AT MORDEN, MANITOBA (SW 8-3-5 WPM)

6 /s) 3 5 Mean Monthly 4 Max. Monthly

3 Min. Monthly

Monthly Discharge (m 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Month

Plate 5A-5 View downstream of Deadhorse Creek near Morden, Manitoba through proposed pipeline crossing (October 16, 2006).

February 2007 4663 Page 5A-5

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

Water Quality Information

Sediment data is only available for the Souris River. There is no sediment data available for Oak Creek, Cypress River, Mary Jane Creek or Deadhorse Creek (Environment Canada 2006e).

TABLE 5A-6

HISTORICAL DAILY SEDIMENT LOADS (TONNES) SUMMARY FOR THE SOURIS RIVER NEAR WAWANESA, MANITOBA (NW 26-7-17 WPM)

Discharge Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Mean Monthly 4.36 4.81 77.06 344.66 68.83 12.17 3.24 4.07 3.65 3.04 6.18 6.00 Max. Monthly 25.3 31.2 4,860 11,900 1,910 229 24.6 120 58.8 58.4 55.1 62.5 Min. Monthly 0 0 0 0.227 0.051 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.0007 0.078 0.096 0.006 Years of Sediment Load Record: 1980 to 1994 Maximum Daily Sediment Load: 11,900 tonnes (April 6, 1987) (extreme recorded for the period of record) Minimum Daily Sediment Load: 0.00 tonnes (multiple dates in January and February 1990) Drainage Area: 61,100 km2 Source: Environment Canada 2006a

FIGURE 5A-6

HISTORICAL DAILY SEDIMENT LOADS (TONNES) SUMMARY FOR THE SOURIS RIVER NEAR WAWANESA, MANITOBA (NW 26-7-17 WPM)

350 325 300 275 250 225 Mean Monthly 200 175 150 125 100 Load (Tonnes) 75 50

Mean Monthly Sediment 25 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Month

February 2007 4663 Page 5A-6

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5B

TABLES OF POTENTIAL RARE PLANT AND RARE PLANT COMMUNITIES FOR THE ECOREGIONS TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

February 2007 4663

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-1

POTENTIAL RARE VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES IN THE ASPEN PARKLAND ECOREGION TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

Right-of-Way Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations Achnatherum Indian rice grass dry prairies and sand hills yes --- S2 --- hymenoides (Oryzopsis hymenoides) Agalinis aspera rough purple agalinis gravelly loam --- yes S1S2 Endangered3 Alisma gramineum narrow-leaved water- shallow water and mud shores yes --- S1 --- plantain

Andropogon hallii sand bluestem dry prairies and sand hills yes yes S2 --- Arnica fulgens shining arnica moist meadows and gravely yes yes S2 --- prairies Artemisia cana silver sagebrush, hoary deep loam and sandy soils on N/A --- S2 --- sagebrush floodplains, uplands and rocky open sites rich upland aspen, balsam poplar ------S3? --- Asarum canadense wild ginger and elm woods, often calcareous Asclepias lanuginosa hairy milkweed sandhills yes yes S1 --- Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed dry open woods and slopes N/A yes S2 --- Asclepias viridiflora green milkweed dry hillsides N/A yes S3 --- Astragalus gilviflorus cushion milkvetch dry prairies yes --- S1 --- Astragalus pectinatus narrow-leaved milkvetch arid grasslands N/A --- S2S3 --- Atriplex argentea saltbrush, silvery atriplex alkaline soils yes --- S2 --- Bidens amplissima beggar-ticks moist edges of pond or lakes N/A --- SNA --- Boltonia asteroides var. white boltonia shores yes yes S2S3 G5T3T52 recognita Botrychium multifidum leathery grape-fern acid sandy grasslands and fields yes yes S3 --- Bouteloua curtipendula side-oats grama dry prairies yes yes S2 --- Bromus porteri Porter's chess woodlands --- yes S3? --- Bromus pubescens Canada brome grass moist streambanks, meadows, yes yes SNA --- riparian thickets and forests Buchloë dactyloides buffalo grass dry prairies ------S1 Threatened3,4 Calamagrostis plains reed grass dry grasslands yes --- S3 --- montanensis Callitriche heterophylla larger water-starwort wetlands N/A --- S2 ---

Carex bicknellii Bicknell's sedge dry prairies, barren rocky areas N/A yes SH ---

Carex cryptolepis northeastern sedge moist areas around streams, N/A --- S1 --- ponds and lakes Carex gravida heavy sedge calcareous soils in open forests N/A yes S1 --- and prairies Carex hallii Hall's sedge wet meadows N/A yes S3 ---

Carex hystericina porcupine sedge marshes and wetlands N/A --- S3? ---

Carex parryana Parry's sedge moist areas around streams, N/A yes S3? --- ponds and lakes Carex prairea prairie sedge moist wetland soils N/A --- S4? ---2

Carex sterilis dioecious sedge fens, openings in swamps, lake N/A yes S2 --- and river shores, wet calcareous areas Carex supina var. weak sedge moist areas around streams, N/A yes S2? G5T3T52 spaniocarpa ponds and lakes Carex tetanica rigid sedge dry calcareous woods N/A yes S2 ---

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-1

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-1 Cont'd

Right-of-Way Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations moist meadows and thickets N/A yes S4 --- Carex torreyi Torrey's sedge Carex tribuloides prickly sedge wet woodlands and moist N/A yes SNA --- meadows Carex xerantica white-scaled sedge grasslands and openings in dry N/A yes S3? --- forests Celtis occidintalis hackberry, nettle-tree well drained sand and gravel ------S1 --- beach ridges Chenopodium smooth goosefoot active sand dunes yes --- S1 G3G42, subglabrum Threatened3 Clematis ligusticifolia western virgin's-bower moist places in arid areas yes --- S1 --- Coreopsis tinctoria common tickseed grassy clearings yes --- SH --- Cornus alternifolia alternate-leaved dogwood forest margins and understory N/A --- S3 --- Cryptotainia canadensis honewort rich damp woods yes --- S2 --- Cycloloma atriplicifolium winged pigseed sandy sites yes yes S2 --- Cymopterus acaulis plains cymopterus marshy ground N/A yes S2S3 --- Cyperus schweinitzii Schweinitz's flatsedge dry sandy soil and active dunes yes yes S2 --- Cypripedium candidum small white lady's-slipper calcareous prairie openings in yes --- S1 Endangered3,4,5 wooded grasslands and open south-facing slopes Dalea villosa var. vilosa silky prairie-clover dry, sandy prairie sites yes --- S2 Threatened3,4 Desmodium canadense beggar's-lice moist open forests and edges N/A yes S2 --- Drosera anglica oblong-leaved sundew swamps and bogs N/A --- S3 --- Eleocharis engelmannii Engelmann's spike-rush wet muddy places N/A --- S1 --- Elymus hystrix bottle-brush grass rich moist woods yes yes S2 --- Eragrostis hypnoides creeping teal love grass wetlands yes yes S4 --- Erigeron caespitosus tufted fleabane sandy hillsides and prairies yes --- S2 --- Escoba vivipara pincushion cactus dry plains and sandhills yes --- S2 --- (Coryphantha vivipara) Festuca hallii plains rough fescue dry grassland yes --- S3 --- Galium aparine cleavers, goosegrass moist woods --- yes SU --- Hackelia floribunda large flowered stickseed rocky slopes, grasslands and N/A yes SU --- shrub lands Helianthus nuttallii ssp. tuberous-rooted sunflower dry silty and sandy sites N/A yes S2 --- rydbergii Heliotropium seaside heliotrope alkaline shores yes --- SH --- curassavicum Hypoxis hirsuta yellow stargrass wet to dry woodlands and prairies yes yes S3 --- Juncus interior inland rush moist prairies, marshy sites and yes yes S1 --- forest edges Krascheninnikovia lanata winterfat prairies and foothills yes --- S2 --- (Eurotia lanata) Leersia oryzoides rice cutgrass marshes and lowlands around yes yes S3? --- rivers Lemna turionifera duckweed ponds and marshes yes --- SU --- Lomatium macrocarpum long-fruited parsley dry open hillsides N/A yes S3 --- Lomatium orientale white-flowered parsley dry plains and bluffs yes yes S1 --- Lomatogonium rotatum marsh felwort wet alkaline soil ------S2S3 --- Lotus purshianus prairie trefoil roadsides, open dry disturbed N/A yes S2S3 --- areas Malaxis brachypoda white adder's mouth damp woods and bogs yes --- S2? --- Malaxis paludosa bog adder's-mouth wet sphagnum bogs ------S1 ---

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-2

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-1 Cont'd

Right-of-Way Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations Mentzelia decapetala gumbo-lily bare, wind eroded soil ------SH --- Mertensia lanceolata tall lungwort steppes --- yes S2 --- Mimulus glabratus smooth monkeyflower shady boggy springs N/A yes S1 --- Mimulus glabratus var. smooth monkeyflower wet lime rich soils N/A yes S1 --- jamesii Musineon divaricatum leafy musineon dry hillsides yes --- S2 --- Myosurus minimus ssp. least mousetail calcareous and alkaline soils yes yes S1 --- minimus Nassella viridula (Stipa green needle grass dry prairie grassland yes --- S3 --- viridula) Orobanche ludoviciana Louisiana broom-rape dry hills and sand dunes yes --- S2 --- Osmorhiza claytonii woolly or hairy sweet cicely deciduous woods --- yes S2 --- Ostrya virginiana hop-hornbeam rich woods yes --- S2 --- Parietaria pensylvanica American pellitory shaded gravely places and --- yes S4 --- disturbed areas Penstemon nitidus smooth blue beard-tongue sandy or gravely prairies yes --- S2 --- Penstemon procerus slender beard-tongue moist prairies yes --- S1? --- Phryma leptostachya lopseed rich woods, slopes, ravines moist N/A yes S3 --- thickets Plagiobothrys scouleri Scouler's allocarya wetlands and moist areas N/A --- S1 G5TNR2 var. scouleri Plantago elongata ssp. linear leaved-plantain wetlands yes yes S2 --- elongata Piptatherum micranthum little-seed rice grass open woods or rocky ridges or yes --- S2 --- (Oryzopsis micrantha) slopes Platanthera orbiculata round-leaved bog orchid woods ------S3 --- Poa arida plains bluegrass dry grasslands yes yes S4 --- Poa cusickii mutton grass dry prairie and sand hills yes yes S2? --- Poa fendleriana mutton grass open prairie yes yes S2 --- Polanisia dodecandra clammyweed sandy or gravely soil N/A yes S1 --- ssp. dodecandra Polanisia dodecandra clammyweed sandy or gravelly soil, often on N/A yes S1 --- ssp. trachysperma disturbed or eroding sites Polygala verticillata whorled milkwort prairie and dry hills yes yes S2 --- Polygala verticillata var. whorled milkwort prairie and dry hills N/A yes S2 --- isocycla Potamogeton amplifolius large-leaved pondweed lakes and streams ------S2? --- Potamogeton illinoenses Illinois pondweed lakes and streams ------S2? --- Potentilla flabelliformis graceful cinquefoil meadows and prairies yes yes S1 --- (P. gracilis var. flabelliformis) Potentilla plattensis low cinquefoil moist meadows and prairies yes yes S2 --- Ranunculus cymbalaria seaside crowfoot lake and stream edges N/A yes S1S2 --- var. saximontanus Rhynchospora capillacea horned beakrush bogs ------S2 --- Salix brachycarpa short-capsuled willow coastal tundra and estuaries N/A --- S3 --- Sanguinaria canadensis blood-root rich woods yes --- S2 --- Schedonnardus tumble-grass plains and dry alkaline prairies --- yes S2 --- paniculatus Sisyrinchium campestre white-eyed grass prairies, meadows and roadsides --- yes SU --- Sporobolus neglectus annual dropseed dry sandy soils yes yes S3? --- Thermopsis rhombifolia golden bean dry prairies yes yes S2 ---

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-3

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-1 Cont'd

Right-of-Way Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations Townsendia exscapa silky townsend-daisy sandhills yes --- S2 --- Tradescantia occidentalis western spiderwort in sandy soils on open to partially yes --- S1 Threatened3,4,5 stabilized dune systems Uvularia sessilifolia small bellwort rich woods and thickets yes --- S2 --- Verbena bracteata bracted vervain sandy prairie, roadsides N/A yes S3 --- Sources: Barkworth et al. 2006, COSEWIC 2007, Environment Canada 2006c, FNA Editorial Committee 1993+, Douglas et al. 1998-2002, Kershaw et al. 2001, MB CDC 2006a, Moss 1983, NatureServe 2007, White and Johnson 1980. Notes: 1. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (NatureServe 2007). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Secure: common, widespread, and abundant in the province. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions. Typically with considerably more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. Q = Questionable taxonomy: taxonomic status is questionable; numeric rank may change with taxonomy. T = Designates a rank associated with a subspecies. NA = Not Applicable: a conservation status is not applicable because the species is not a suitable target for conservation activities. H = Historical occurrence; usually not verified in the last 20 years, but with some expectation that it may be rediscovered. U = Unrankable: currently unrankable due to lack of information or due to substantially conflicting information about status or trends. ? = Inexact numeric rank: denotes inexact numeric rank.

2. Global (G) ranks are based on species status world-wide and follow a system parallel to that for Provincial Ranks (Note 1), ranging from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions). Only Global Ranks of concern (G1 to G3) or questionable ranks are displayed (NatureServe 2007). 3. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC 2007). Species listed as 'Extirpated', 'Not at Risk' or 'Data Deficient' were generally not included in the table without other noteworthy factors being present. Endangered: A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened: A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed. 4. Species at Risk Act. The Act establishes Schedule 1 as the list of species to be protected on all federal lands in Canada. Endangered: a species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction. 5. Manitoba Endangered Species Act Endangered: any native Manitoba species that is threatened to disappear throughout all or most of its Manitoba range. Threatened: any native Manitoba species likely to become endangered or at risk due to low or declining numbers in Manitoba if the factors affecting it do not improve. 6. N/A - Indicates that range information for this species or subspecies/variety, in Manitoba, is not available.

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-4

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-2

POTENTIAL RARE VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES IN THE BOREAL TRANSITION ECOREGION TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

Preferred Right-of-Way Habitat in within Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range2 Right-of-Way3 Rank1 Designations Asarum canadense wild ginger rich upland aspen, balsam poplar and --- N/A S3? --- elm woods, often calcareous Carex athrostachya long-bracted sedge marshes and wet ground N/A N/A S1 --- Carex emoryi Emory's sedge marshes and wet ground N/A N/A S2? --- Carex torreyi Torrey's sedge mesic to moist meadows and N/A N/A S4 --- shrublands Cornus alternifolia alternate-leaved forest margins and understorey N/A N/A S3 --- dogwood Cryptotainia honewort rich damp woods yes N/A S2 --- canadensis Osmorhiza claytonii woolly or hairy deciduous woods --- N/A S2 --- sweet cicely Phryma leptostachya lopseed rich woods, slopes, ravines moist N/A N/A S3 --- thickets Sanguinaria blood-root rich woods yes N/A S2 --- canadensis Uvularia sessilifolia small bellwort rich woods and thickets yes N/A S2 --- Wolffia columbiana water-meal beaver ponds --- N/A S1 --- Sources: Douglas et al. 1998-2002, Environment Canada 2006c, MB CDC 2006a, NatureServe 2007 Notes: 1. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (NatureServe 2007). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Secure: common, widespread, and abundant in the province. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions. Typically with considerably more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. 2. N/A - Indicates that range information for this species or subspecies/variety, in Manitoba, is not available. 3. N/A - Segments of the route surveyed during the 2006 vegetation reconnaissance did not include areas in the Boreal Transition Ecoregion.

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-5

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-3

POTENTIAL RARE VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES IN THE LAKE MANITOBA PLAIN ECOREGION TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

Preferred Habitat Right-of-Way within in Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Species Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations Agalinis aspera rough purple agalinis gravelly loam --- yes S1S2 Endangered3 Agalinis tenuifolia narrow-leaved wet places --- yes S2S3 --- gerardia Alisma gramineum narrow-leaved water- shallow water and mud yes yes S1 --- plantain shores Amorpha fruticosa false indigo dry prairies, thickets and N/A --- S1S2 --- shores Arisaema triphyllum jack-in-the-pulpit rich woods N/A yes S2 --- ssp. triphyllum Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed dry open woods and slopes N/A yes S2 --- Astragalus neglectus milkvetch calcareous gravel and cliffs ------S1 --- Atriplex argentea saltbrush, silvery alkaline soils yes --- S2 --- atriplex Boltonia asteroides white boltonia shores yes yes S2S3 G5T3T52 var. recognita Botrychium pallidum pale moonwort meadows, open deciduous yes yes S1 G32 forests and hayfields Bouteloua side-oats grama dry prairies yes --- S2 --- curtipendula Bromus pubescens Canada brome grass moist streambanks, yes yes SNA --- meadows, riparian thickets and forests Calamagrostis plains reed grass dry grasslands yes --- S3 --- montanensis Cardamine bulbosa spring cress wet ground --- yes SH --- Carex albicans var. yellow-beaked sedge dry calcareous soils in open N/A yes SNA --- albicans woodlands Carex crawei Crawe's sedge wet meadows and seepage N/A yes S3S4 --- areas Carex cristatella crested sedge moist woodlands and wet N/A yes S2 --- prairie Carex douglasii Douglas sedge alkaline meadows N/A yes S3? ---

Carex emoryi Emory's sedge marshes and wet ground N/A yes S2? ---

Carex hallii Hall's sedge wet meadows N/A yes S3 ---

Carex hystericina porcupine sedge marshes and wetlands N/A --- S3? ---

Carex livida livid sedge marshes, calcareous yes --- S3 --- meadows and bogs Carex parryana Parry's sedge moist areas around streams, N/A yes S3? --- ponds and lakes Carex projecta necklace sedge moist meadows, N/A yes S2? --- streambanks and wet woods Carex supina var. weak sedge moist areas around streams, N/A yes S2? G5T3T52 spaniocarpa ponds and lakes Carex tetanica rigid sedge dry calcareous woods N/A --- S2 ---

Carex tribuloides prickly sedge wet woodlands and moist N/A yes SNA --- meadows Carex vulpinoidea fox sedge wet marshes N/A yes S3? --- Celtis occidintalis hackberry, nettle-tree well drained sand and gravel ------S1 --- beach ridges

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-6

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-3 Cont'd

Preferred Habitat Right-of-Way within in Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Species Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations Circaea lutetiana var. large enchanter's- rich woods --- yes S2 --- canadensis nightshade Cirsium discolour field thistle wet meadows and shores ------S1 --- Clematis ligusticifolia western virgin's- moist places in arid areas yes --- S1 --- bower Clematis virginiana virgin's bower thickets and forest edges yes --- S2 --- Cornus alternifolia alternate-leaved forest margins and N/A --- S3 --- dogwood understory Cuscuta pentogona dodder grasslands N/A yes SU --- var. pentogona Cyperus erythrorhizos red-root flatsedge wet marshy areas N/A yes S1 --- Cyperus houghtonii Houghton's umbrella- sandy soil ------S2 --- sedge Cyperus schweinitzii Schweinitz's dry sandy soil and active N/A yes S2 --- flatsedge dunes Cypripedium small white lady's- calcareous prairie openings yes --- S1 Endangered3,4,5 candidum slipper in wooded grasslands and open south-facing slopes Dalea villosa var. silky prairie-clover dry, sandy prairie sites yes --- S2 Threatened3,4 vilosa Desmodium beggar's-lice moist open forests and N/A yes S2 --- canadense edges Elodea nuttallii waterweed lakes, rivers, ponds and --- yes S1 --- ditches Elymus hystrix bottle-brush grass rich moist woods yes yes S2 --- Festuca hallii plains rough fescue dry grassland yes --- S3 --- Galium aparine cleavers, goosegrass moist woods --- yes SU --- Gentiana puberulenta downy gentian moist meadows and forests N/A yes S2 --- Heranthera dubia water star-grass shallow water up to 1 m --- yes S2 --- deep, of ponds, streams etc. Hudsonia tomentosa false heather pine sand-hills and dunes. ------S3 --- Hypoxis hirsuta yellow stargrass wet to dry woodlands and yes yes S3 --- prairies Krigia biflora dwarf dandelion open sandy woods --- yes S2 --- Lactuca floridana woodland lettuce thickets and forest margin --- yes SH --- Lechea intermedia pinweed dry sandy and rocky areas N/A yes S1 --- Leersia oryzoides rice cutgrass marshes and lowlands yes yes S3? --- around rivers Lotus perrshianus prairie trefoil roadsides, open dry N/A yes S2S3 --- disturbed areas Orobanche Louisiana broom-rape dry hills and sand dunes yes --- S2 --- ludoviciana Osmorhiza blunt-fruited sweet moist and wet open forests N/A yes S2 --- depauperata cicely and meadows Oxytropis deflexa reflexed locoweed open woods, moist thickets N/A yes S3? --- and banks. Parietaria American pellitory shaded gravely places and --- yes S4 --- pensylvanica disturbed areas Pellaea glabella ssp. cliff-brake limestone outcrops and ------S2 --- occidentalis calcareous cliffs Penthorum sedoides ditch-stonecrop shores and ditches --- yes S1S2 --- Phryma leptostachya lopseed rich woods, slopes, ravines N/A yes S3 --- moist thickets Polygala verticillata whorled milkwort prairie and dry hills yes yes S2 --- Polygala verticillata whorled milkwort prairie and dry hills N/A yes S2 --- var. isocycla Ranunculus seaside crowfoot lake and stream edges N/A yes S1S2 --- cymbalaria var.

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-7

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-3 Cont'd

Preferred Habitat Right-of-Way within in Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Species Range6 Right-of-Way Rank1 Designations saximontanus Sanguinaria blood-root rich woods yes yes S2 --- canadensis Scirpus rufus red bulrush saline and alkaline mud flats N/A --- S2 --- (Blysmopsis rufa) Sisyrinchium white-eyed grass dry to moist grassy forest --- yes SU --- campestre openings Solidago riddellii Riddell's goldenrod chernozemic soils --- yes S2 Special Concern3,4, Threatened5 Sporobolus asper tall dropseed prairies and rocky hills N/A yes S1 --- Sporobolus neglectus annual dropseed dry sandy soils yes yes S3? --- Symphyotrichum western silvery aster dry prairies, fields and ------S2 Threatened3,4,5 sericeum (Aster openings in bur oak / sericeus) trembling aspen woodlands Verbena bracteata bracted vervain sandy prairie, roadsides N/A --- S3 --- Vernonia fasciculata western ironweed wet prairies N/A yes SH G5T3T52 ssp. corymbosa Veronicastrum Culver's-root edges of thickets and open ------S1 Threatened5 virginicum aspen/bur oak woods, adjacent to shrubs along linear disturbances Viola conspersa dog violet moist woods N/A yes S3? --- Sources: BArkworth et al., 2006, COSEWIC 2007, Environment Canada 2006c, Douglas et al. 1998-2002, FNA Editorial Committee 1993 +, NatureServe 2007 Notes: 1. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (NatureServe 2007). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Secure: common, widespread, and abundant in the province. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions. Typically with considerably more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. Q = Questionable taxonomy: taxonomic status is questionable; numeric rank may change with taxonomy. T = Designates a rank associated with a subspecies. NA = Not Applicable: a conservation status is not applicable because the species is not a suitable target for conservation activities. H = Historical occurrence; usually not verified in the last 20 years, but with some expectation that it may be rediscovered. U = Unrankable: currently unrankable due to lack of information or due to substantially conflicting information about status or trends. ? = Inexact numeric rank: denotes inexact numeric rank. 2. Global (G) ranks are based on species status world-wide and follow a system parallel to that for Provincial Ranks (Note 1), ranging from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions). Only Global Ranks of concern (G1 to G3) or questionable ranks are displayed (NatureServe 2007). 3. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC 2007). Species listed as 'Extirpated', 'Not at Risk' or 'Data Deficient' were generally not included in the table without other noteworthy factors being present. Endangered: A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened: A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed. Special Concern: A species that is particularly sensitive to human activities or natural events, but is not an endangered or threatened species.

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-8

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-3 Cont'd

4. Species at Risk Act. The Act establishes Schedule 1 as the list of species to be protected on all federal lands in Canada. Endangered: a species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction. Special Concern: a species that may become a threatened or an endangered species because of a combination of biological characteristics and identified threats. 5. Endangered Species Act Endangered: Any native Manitoba species that is threatened to disappear throughout all or most of its Manitoba range. Threatened: Any native Manitoba species likely to become endangered or at risk due to low or declining numbers in Manitoba if the factors affecting it do not improve. 6. N/A - Indicates that range information for this species or subspecies/variety, in Manitoba, is not available.

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-9

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5B-4

POTENTIAL RARE PLANT COMMUNITIES IN THE ECOREGIONS OF THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

Right-of-Way within Provincial Global Common Name Scientific Name Community Range3 Rank1 Rank2 Aspen Parkland little bluestem-grama grass (blue, side- Andropogon scoparius (Schizachyrium scoparium)-Bouteloua yes S3 GNR oats)-thread-leaved sedge herbaceous spp. (curtipendula, gracilis)-Carex filifolia herbaceous vegetation vegetation green ash-(American elm)-Manitoba Fraxinus pennsylvanica-(Ulmus Americana)-Acer negundo yes S3 GNR maple forest forest creeping juniper/little bluestem dwarf Juniperus horizontalis/ Andropogon scoparius (Schizachyrium yes S3? GNR shrubland scoparium) dwarf-shrubland bur oak/Saskatoon serviceberry Quercus macrocarpa /Amelanchier alnifolia /Aralia nudicaulis- yes S3? GNR /sarsaparilla-assiniboia sedge forest Carex assiniboinensis forest needle-and-thread - blue grama - thread- Stipa comata-Bouteloua gracilis-Carex filifolia herbaceous N/A S3 GNR leaved sedge herbaceous vegetation vegetation Boreal Transition plains rough fescue-(spear grass) yes S1 GNR Festuca hallii-(Stipa spp.) herbaceous vegetation herbaceous vegetation Lake Manitoba Plain big bluestem-prairie dropseed-little Andropogon gerardii-Sporobolus heterolepis-Andropogon N/A S1 GNR bluestem herbaceous vegetation scoparius (Schizachyrium scoparium) herbaceous vegetation green ash-(American elm)-Manitoba Fraxinus pennsylvanica-(Ulmus Americana)-Acer negundo yes S3 GNR maple forest forest green ash-American elm-(hackberry, Fraxinus pennsylvanica-Ulmus Americana-(Celtis occidentalis, N/A S2 GNR basswood) forest Tilia Americana) forest common reed herbaceous vegetation Phragmites australis herbaceous vegetation N/A S3? GNR trembling aspen/American hazel- Populus tremuloides/Corylus Americana-(Symphoricarpos N/A S4 GNR (snowberry) forest occidentalis) forest trembling aspen-bur oak/sarsaparilla Populus tremuloides-Quercus macrocarpa/Aralia nudicaulis N/A S3S4 GNR forest forest bur oak/Saskatoon yes S3? GNR Quercus macrocarpa/Amelanchier alnifolia/Aralia nudicaulis- serviceberry/sarsaparilla-assiniboia sedge Carex assiniboinensis forest forest sandbar willow shrubland Salix exigua shrubland N/A S3S4 GNR sprangletop herbaceous vegetation Scolochloa festucacea herbaceous vegetation N/A S3S4 GNR cattail herbaceous vegetation Typha spp. herbaceous vegetation N/A S5 GNR Source: MB CDC 2006a, NatureServe 2007 Notes: 1. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (NatureServe 2007). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Secure: common, widespread, and abundant in the province. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions. Typically with considerably more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. ? = Inexact numeric rank: denotes inexact numeric rank. 2. Global (G) ranks are based on species status world-wide and follow a system parallel to that for Provincial Ranks (Note 1), ranging from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions). For legibility, ranks G4-G5 and T4-T5 are not displayed (NatureServe 2007). NR =Unranked: rank not yet assessed 3. Community ranges are based on information from the Environmental and Socio-economic Impact Assessment (EA) for Terrace Phase I (TERA 1997). N/A indicates that this information was not available in the Terrace Phase I EA report.

February 2007 4663 Page 5B-10

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5C

TABLES OF POTENTIAL RARE WILDLIFE SPECIES FOR THE ECOREGIONS TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

February 2007 4663

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-1

POTENTIAL RARE WILDLIFE SPECIES IN THE ASPEN PARKLAND ECOREGION TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

ROW Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1,2 Designations MAMMALS Odocoileus mule or black- Open coniferous forests, yes yes S32 Threatened6 hemionus tailed deer sub-climax brush, aspen parklands, steep broken terrain, and river valleys. Onychomys northern Open grasslands yes yes S31 --- leucogaster grasshopper interspersed with mouse sagebrush. Perognathus olive-backed Open grasslands; sandy yes yes S31 --- fasciatus pocket mouse soil. Sorex haydeni Hayden's prairie Dense vegetation, shrubby --- yes S3S41 --- shrew areas and meadows. Sylvilagus floridanus eastern cottontail Meadows, orchards, fence --- yes S31 --- rows and weedy/shrubby areas near woodlots. Taxidea taxus badger Open prairies, farm land yes yes S3S41 --- and park land, not forests. BIRDS Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk Aspen groves, parkland yes yes S4B, S2M, --- woodlots; wooded coulees S2N1, S4B2 and riparian forests of grasslands. Aechmophorus Clark's grebe Larger lakes with emergent --- yes S1B1 --- clarkii vegetation. Ammodramus bairdii Baird's sparrow Dry grassy, shrubby fields. yes yes S2S3B2 Endangered6 Ammodramus grasshopper Hayfields and prairies. yes yes S2S3B2 --- savannarum sparrow Anthus spragueii Sprague's pipit Native grassland. yes yes S2S3B2 Threatened4,5 Ardea herodias great blue heron Open shallow water, edges yes yes S3B1 Special of bays, streams, river Concern4 margins, sloughs, lakes, ponds, ditches, mud flats, and marshes, nests on deciduous, coniferous and mixed wood land sometimes at considerable distances from water. Athene cunicularia burrowing owl Dry, open short-grass --- yes S1B3 Endangered4,5,6, country. 7 Buteo regalis ferruginous hawk Open, arid habitats --- yes S2B2, Special dominated by grasses or S4B, S4M1 Concern4, sagebrush. It requires an Threatened6 elevated nest site. Caprimulgus whip-poor-will Ungrazed mixed, deciduous --- yes S3B1 --- vociferus or open coniferous woods. Cathartes aura turkey vulture Various types of terrain, yes yes S3B, S2M, --- except heavy unbroken S2N1 forest. Chaetura pelagica chimney swift Open water or land. --- yes S3B1 --- Charadrius snowy plover Flat sandy beaches, salt --- yes S1B1 --- alexandrinus flats and sandy areas with little vegetation.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-1

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-1 Cont'd

ROW Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1,2 Designations Charadrius melodus piping plover Nest on gravel shores of yes yes S2B2, S3B1 G33, circumcinctus circumcinctus shallow, saline lakes and on Endangered4,5,6, subspecies sandy shores of larger 7 prairie lakes. Seeps also provide important foraging habitat on the Prairies. Charadrius mountain plover Heavily grazed or recently --- yes S1B1 G23, montanus burned mixed grassland in Endangered4,5 flat upland areas. Charadrius semipalmated Mudflats, sandy or muddy --- yes S1B, S5M1 --- semipalmatus plover beaches, flat open margins of ponds, lakes and rivers. Chlidonias niger black tern Watery marshes, lakes, yes yes S3S4B2 --- ponds, sloughs, and rivers in either treeless or wooded country. Coturnicops yellow rail Marshes, damp fields, yes yes S3B, S2M1 Special noveboracensis meadows and on the Concern4,5 floodplains of rivers and streams. Cygnus buccinator trumpeter swan Small to medium-sized --- yes S1B1 --- shallow, isolated lakes with well developed emergent and submergent plant communities. Cygnus columbianus tundra swan Migratory species. yes yes S5M1 --- Dendroica black-throated Deciduous and mixedwood ------S2B1 --- caerulescens blue warbler with shrub or sapling understory, old clearings and logged areas. Egretta thula snowy egret Larger waterbodies. --- yes S1B1 --- Falco mexicanus prairie falcon Canyons and coulees of the --- yes S3B, S3M, --- badlands; cliffs of river S3N1 valleys. Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon Nest on cliff ledges on steep yes yes S1B, S4M, Threatened4,5, 1 anatum anatum cliffs, usually near wetlands. S2N Endangered6 subspecies Prefer open habitats such as wetlands, tundra, savannah, sea coasts and mountain meadows, but will also hunt over open forest. Gavia stellata red-throated loon Freshwater ponds and lakes --- yes S1B1 --- in forested areas. Grus americana whooping crane Open marshy areas. yes yes SXB, S1M1 G13, Endangered4,5,6, 7

Haliaeetus bald eagle Common breeder in north yes yes S5B, S4M, --- leucocephalus Saskatchewan, uncommon S4N1 breeder and transient in south Saskatchewan; uses uplands and open water in winter. Lanius excubitor northern shrike Open woods, shrubby --- yes S1B, S4M1 --- swamps, open grasslands with fence posts and scattered trees. Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead shrike Open country with trees, yes yes S3S4B2, Threatened4,5, 1 excubitorides excubitorides shrubs, poles or post for S4B Endangered6 subspecies lookout and nesting.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-2

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-1 Cont'd

ROW Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1,2 Designations Limnodromus short-billed Muskegs, bogs and --- yes S1B, S4M1 --- griseus dowitcher marshes with low vegetation. Melanerpes red-headed Requires multiple snags for yes yes S1B, S1M1 Special erythrocephalus woodpecker nesting, roosting, and Concern4 foraging. Habitats used are: open deciduous and riparian woodlands, savannah-like grasslands, forest edges and flooded bottomland forests. Numenius long-billed curlew Large tracts of open yes yes S4B, S4M1 Special americanus grassland with low Concern4,5 vegetative cover for nesting. Numenius borealis Eskimo curlew Open native grassland and --- yes SHM1 G13, tundra, burned prairies, Endangered4,5,6 meadows and pastures. Oporornis agilis Connecticut Spruce and tamarack bogs; ------S2B1 --- warbler dry ridges and knolls with open poplar woods; open immature jack pine woods. Pelecanus American white Freshwater lakes in both yes yes S3B1 G33 erythrorhynchos pelican treeless and forested areas. Phalaenoptilus common poorwill Semi-arid sagebrush --- yes S3B1 --- nuttallii benchlands or grassy openings in dry open woods. Pinicola enucleator pine grosbeak Open coniferous forest --- yes S2B,S4N1 --- openings and edges; deciduous forest, shade trees around towns, apple orchards and tall shrubbery. Piranga olivacea scarlet tanager Mature deciduous woods, ------S1B1 --- mixedwoods and pine woods. Sialia sialis eastern bluebird Nests in eastern parklands, yes yes S4B1 --- occasionally north to the Saskatoon and Greenwater Lake districts. Sterna caspia Caspian tern Large lakes with emergent --- yes S2B, S2M1 --- vegetation and sandy beaches. Strix nebulosa great gray owl Mixedwoods near water ------S3B, S3N1 --- sources. Strix varia barred owl Mature woodlands yes --- S3S42, --- preferably near water S3B, S3N1 bodies. Surnia ulula northern hawk-owl Open coniferous or ------S3B, S5N1 --- mixedwoods, muskeg, or burnt areas with standing stumps. Vireo flavifrons yellow-throated Mature deciduous woods ------S2B, S3N1 --- vireo along hillsides and riparian woods. HERPTILES Eumeces northern prairie Sandy areas located close yes yes S22 Endangered4,5 septentrionalis skink to a water source such as a river or a swamp. Storeria redbelly snake Wooded hilly regions and at yes --- S42 --- occipitomaculata the edge of clearings near bogs.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-3

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-1 Cont'd

ROW Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1,2 Designations Bufo cognatus great plains toad Deserts, grasslands, semi- --- yes S2S32, S31 Special desert shrublands, open Concern4,5, floodplains, and agricultural Threatened6 areas; typically in stream valleys. Burrows underground when inactive. Chelydra serpentine snapping turtle Prefer slow moving and yes yes S31 --- shallow waters, can be found living on the edge of deep lakes and rivers. Rana pipiens northern leopard Streams or larger ponds yes yes S31 G5TNR3, frog that do not freeze solid with Special vegetation 15 to 30 cm tall. Concern4,5 FISH Acipenser fulvescens lake sturgeon Bottom of gravelly tributary, yes yes S2S32, S21 G3G43, streams of rivers and lakes. Endangered4 Ambloplites rupestris rock bass Well-oxygenated, hard yes yes S2S31 --- water walleye lakes with boulder and sand bottoms. Ameiurus nebulosus brown bullhead Clear water in deep pools yes yes S31 --- with submerged vegetation. Hiodon tergisus mooneye Clear water of large --- yes S31 --- streams, rivers and lakes. Ichthyomyzon chestnut lamprey Medium and large rivers. --- yes S3S42 Special castaneus Concern4 Ictalurus punctatus channel catfish Rivers and large creeks in --- yes S2S31 --- slow to moderate current over sand, gravel or rocks; ponds, lakes, reservoirs. Ictiobus cyprinellus bigmouth buffalo Lowland lakes, sloughs and yes yes S31 Special large rivers with slow to still Concern4 waters and bottoms of mud, silt, sand and gravel. Macrhybopsis silver chub Large, moderate flow rivers yes yes S32 Special storeriana with a substrate of silt or Concern4,5 sand, but sometimes gravel, rubble, boulder or bedrock. Notropis dorsalis bigmouth shiner Runs and pools of shallow yes yes S32 --- open headwaters, creeks, and small to medium rivers with bottom predominantly sand, often overlain with silt, sometimes also in lakes. INVERTEBRATES Danaus plexippus monarch Wherever milkweed and yes yes S52, S3B1 Special wildflowers exist. This Concern4,5 includes abandoned farmland, along roadsides, and other open spaces where these plants grow. Hesperia dacotae Dakota skipper Native tall-grass prairies. yes yes S2S32, S11 G23, Threatened4,5,6

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-4

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-1 Cont'd

S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Demonstrably Secure: common; widespread and abundant, though it may be rare in parts of its range. Usually more than 1000 occurrences. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. B = Breeding: basic rank refers to the breeding population of a migratory species in the element. M = Migratory: basic rank refers to the transient population of a migratory species in the element. N = Non-breeding: basic rank refers to the non-breeding population of a migratory species in the element. H = Historical occurrence; usually not verified in the last 20 years, but with some expectation that it may be rediscovered. X = Believed to be extinct or extirpated in the element. 2. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province of Manitoba, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (MB CDC 2006a,b). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Demonstrably Secure: common; widespread and abundant, though it may be rare in parts of its range. Usually more than 1000 occurrences. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. B = Breeding: basic rank refers to the breeding population of a migratory species in the element. 3. Global (G) ranks are based on species status world-wide and follow a system parallel to that for Provincial Ranks (Note 1), ranging from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions). Only Global Ranks of concern (G1 to G3) or questionable ranks are displayed (NatureServe 2007). 4. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC 2007). Species listed as 'Extirpated', 'Not at Risk' or 'Data Deficient' were generally not included in the table without other noteworthy factors being present. Endangered: A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened: A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed. 5. Species at Risk Act. The Act establishes Schedule 1 as the list of species to be protected on all federal lands in Canada. Endangered: a species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction. 6. Manitoba Endangered Species Act Endangered: any native Manitoba species that is threatened to disappear throughout all or most of its Manitoba range. Threatened: any native Manitoba species likely to become endangered or at risk due to low or declining numbers in Manitoba if the factors affecting it do not improve. 7. Saskatchewan Wildlife Act, A species legislated as endangered or threatened under the Saskatchewan Wildlife Act as designated by the Endangered Species Advisory Committee (ESAC) using definitions based on those used by COSEWIC in Canada (see Note 3).

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-5

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-2

POTENTIAL RARE WILDLIFE SPECIES IN THE BOREAL TRANSITION ECOREGION TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

ROW Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1 Designations MAMMALS Canis lupus lycaon eastern wolf Inhabits deciduous and yes yes G4TNR2, mixed forests in the Special southern part of its range, Concern3,5 and mixed and coniferous forests further north. Urocyon grey fox Deciduous forests and yes yes Threatened3,5 cinereoargenteus marshes. Den in many different kinds of substrate, usually in areas of dense brush, fairly close to a water source. Also often found on the outskirts of cities. BIRDS Ammodramus bairdii Baird's sparrow Dry grassy, shrubby fields. yes yes S2S3B Endangered4 Anthus spragueii Sprague's pipit Native grassland. yes yes S2S3B Threatened3,5 Asio flammeus short-eared owl Pastures, fields, hay yes yes S3S4B Special meadows, grain stubble, Concern3 airports, young conifer plantations and marshes in winter. Prairies, grassy plains or tundra in summer. Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk Wood land and open yes yes S5B --- country in the vicinity of trees when nesting Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk Open grassland areas with yes yes S3S4B --- scattered trees or with small clumps of trees or shrubs. Charadrius melodus piping plover Sandy beaches yes yes S2B G32, circumcinctus circumcinctus Endangered3,4,5 subspecies Coturnicops yellow rail Marshes, damp fields, yes yes S4B Special noveboracensis meadows and on the Concern3,5 floodplains of rivers and streams. Cygnus buccinator trumpeter swan Lakes, large sloughs and yes yes SXB --- rivers. Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon Nest on cliff ledges on yes yes S1B Threatened3,5, anatum anatum steep cliffs, usually near Endangered4 subspecies wetlands. Prefer open habitats such as wetlands, tundra, savannah, sea coasts and mountain meadows, but will also hunt over open forest. Ixobrychus exilis least bittern Nest in freshwater yes yes S3B Threatened3,5 marshes, where dense tall aquatic vegetation is interspersed with clumps of woody vegetation and open water.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-6

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-2 Cont'd

ROW Preferred within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1 Designations Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead Open country with trees, yes yes S3S4B Threatened3,5, excubitorides shrike shrubs, poles or post for Endangered4 excubitorides lookout and nesting. subspecies Melanerpes red-headed Requires multiple snags yes yes S3S4B Special erythrocephalus woodpecker for nesting, roosting, and Concern3 foraging. Habitats used are: open deciduous and riparian woodlands, savanna-like grasslands, forest edges and flooded bottomland forests Strix varia barred owl Mature woodlands yes --- S3S4 --- preferable near water bodies HERPETILES Liochlorophis vernalis smooth green Meadows, grassy --- yes S3S4 --- snake marshes, moist grassy fields at forest edges, mountain shrublands, stream borders, bogs, open moist woodland, abandoned farmland, and vacant lots. Chelydra serpentine snapping turtle Prefer slow moving and yes yes S3 --- shallow waters, can be found living on the edge of deep lakes and rivers. Rana pipiens northern leopard Streams or larger ponds, yes yes SNR G5TNR2, frog (prairie that do not freeze solid Special population) with vegetation 15 to Concern3,5 30 cm tall. Scaphiopus plains spadefoot Require loose, well- yes yes S3S4 --- bombifrons toad drained soils such as those found in floodplains, prairies, or loess hills. FISH Acipenser fulvescens lake sturgeon Bottom of gravelly yes yes S2S3 G3G42, tributary, streams of rivers Endangered3 and lakes. Lepomis gibbosus pumpkinseed Lakes, reservoirs, ponds, yes yes S1 --- sloughs, and sluggish streams Macrhybopsis silver chub Large, moderate flow yes yes S3 Special storeriana rivers with a substrate of Concern3,5 silt or sand, but sometimes gravel, rubble, boulder or bedrock. INVERTEBRATES Danaus plexippus monarch Wherever milkweed and yes yes S5 Special wildflowers exist. This Concern3,5 includes abandoned farmland, along roadsides, and other open spaces where these plants grow.

Sources: Banfield 1974, Behler and King 1979, COSEWIC 2007, Environment Canada 2006c, Godfrey 1986, MB CDC 2006a,b, NatureServe 2007, Scott and Crossman 1973

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-7

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-2 Cont'd

Notes: 1. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (MB CDC 2006a,b, NatureServe 2007). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Secure: common, widespread, and abundant in the province. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions. Typically with considerably more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. B = Breeding: basic rank refers to the breeding population of a migratory species in the element. Q = Questionable taxonomy: taxonomic status is questionable; numeric rank may change with taxonomy. T = Designates a rank associated with a subspecies.

NA = Not Applicable: a conservation status is not applicable because the species is not a suitable target for conservation activities. NR = Rank is not yet assigned. H = Historical occurrence; usually not verified in the last 20 years, but with some expectation that it may be rediscovered. U = Unrankable: currently unrankable due to lack of information or due to substantially conflicting information about status or trends. X = Believed to be extinct or extirpated in the element. ? = Inexact numeric rank: denotes inexact numeric rank. 2. Global (G) ranks are based on species status world-wide and follow a system parallel to that for Provincial Ranks (Note 1), ranging from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions). Only Global Ranks of concern (G1 to G3) or questionable ranks are displayed (NatureServe 2007). 3. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC 2007). Species listed as 'Extirpated', 'Not at Risk' or 'Data Deficient' were generally not included in the table without other noteworthy factors being present. Endangered: A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened: A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed. 4. Manitoba Endangered Species Act Endangered: any native Manitoba species that is threatened to disappear throughout all or most of its Manitoba range. Threatened: any native Manitoba species likely to become endangered or at risk due to low or declining numbers in Manitoba if the factors affecting it do not improve. 5. Species at Risk Act. The Act establishes Schedule 1 as the list of species to be protected on all federal lands in Canada. Endangered: a species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-8

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-3

POTENTIAL RARE WILDLIFE SPECIES IN THE LAKE MANITOBA PLAIN ECOREGION TRAVERSED BY THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

Preferred ROW within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1 Designations MAMMALS Canis lupus lycaon eastern wolf Inhabits deciduous and yes yes G4TNR2, mixed forests in the southern Special part of its range, and mixed Concern3,5 and coniferous forests further north. Geomys bursarius plains pocket Areas of deep, fine sandy --- yes S3 --- gopher loam. Myotis lucifugus little brown Hibernates in caves. yes --- S2N,S5B --- myotis Originally a forest dweller now adapted to urban lamp lit, tree-shaded streets. Urocyon grey fox Deciduous forests and yes yes Threatened3,5 cinereoargenteus marshes. Den in many different kinds of substrate, usually in areas of dense brush, fairly close to a water source. Also often found on the outskirts of cities. BIRDS Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk Treed areas. yes yes S4B --- Aechmophorus western grebe Freshwater lakes, near edges yes yes S4B --- occidentalis when breeding Ammodramus Baird's sparrow Dry grassy, shrubby fields. yes yes S2S3B Endangered4 bairdii Anthus spragueii Sprague's pipit Native grassland. yes yes S2S3B Threatened3,5 Athene cunicularia burrowing owl Dry, open short-grass --- yes S1B Endangered3,4, country. 5 Botaurus American bittern Marshes, swamps, moist yes yes S4B --- lentiginosus meadows, wet alder or willow thickets, less often drier fields Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk Wood land and open country yes yes S5B --- in the vicinity of trees when nesting Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk Open grassland areas with yes yes S3S4B --- scattered trees or with small clumps of trees or shrubs. Charadrius piping plover Sandy beaches yes yes S2B G32, melodus circumcinctus Endangered3,4, circumcinctus subspecies 5 Coturnicops yellow rail Marshes, damp fields, yes yes S4B Special noveboracensis meadows and on the Concern3,5 floodplains of rivers and streams. Falco columbarius merlin Wood land, either coniferous yes yes S5B --- or deciduous, woodland openings, wooded prairie coulees, and marshes, beaches, mud flats and fields during hunting

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-9

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-3 Cont'd

Preferred ROW within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1 Designations Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon Nest on cliff ledges on steep yes yes S1B Threatened3,5, anatum anatum cliffs, usually near wetlands. Endangered4 subspecies Prefer open habitats such as wetlands, tundra, savannah, sea coasts and mountain meadows, but will also hunt over open forest. Grus canadensis sandhill crane Fields, marshes, bogs, yes yes S5B --- shallow-water, edges of lakes Ixobrychus exilis least bittern Nest in freshwater marshes, yes yes S3B Threatened3,5 where dense tall aquatic vegetation is interspersed with clumps of woody vegetation and open water. Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead Open country with trees, yes yes S3S4B Threatened3,5, excubitorides shrike shrubs, poles or post for Endangered4 excubitorides lookout and nesting. subspecies Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead Open areas with some trees --- yes S1 G4T3Q2, migrans shrike (migrans and shrubs, which provide Endangered3,4, subspecies) nesting sites and perching 5 sites used for hunting. Melanerpes red-headed Requires multiple snags for yes yes S3S4B Special erythrocephalus woodpecker nesting, roosting, and Concern3 foraging. Habitats used are: open deciduous and riparian woodlands, savanna-like grasslands, forest edges and flooded bottomland forests Nycticorax black-crowned Salt and freshwater marshes, yes yes S3S4B --- nycticorax night-heron tidal estuaries, mud flats, edge of lakes and ponds. Pandion haliaetus osprey Lakes and large rivers yes yes S4S5B --- Pelecanus American white Interior lakes in treeless and yes yes S3B G32 erythrorhynchos pelican forested country. Phalacrocorax double-crested Freshwater lakes and rivers yes yes S4B --- auritus cormorant and estuaries. Sterna caspia caspian tern Lakes and large rivers. yes yes S3B --- Strix varia barred owl Mature woodlands preferable yes --- S3S4 --- near water bodies HERPETILES Eumeces northern prairie Sandy areas located close to yes yes SNR Endangered3,5 septentrionalis skink a water source such as a river or a swamp. Liochlorophis smooth green Meadows, grassy marshes, --- yes S3S4 --- vernalis snake moist grassy fields at forest edges, mountain shrublands, stream borders, bogs, open moist woodland, abandoned farmland, and vacant lots. Chelydra snapping turtle Prefer slow moving and yes yes S3 --- serpentina shallow waters, can be found living on the edge of deep lakes and rivers. Rana pipiens northern leopard Streams or larger ponds, that yes yes SNR G5TNR2, frog (prairie do not freeze solid with Special population) vegetation 15 to 30 cm tall. Concern3,5 Scaphiopus plains spadefoot Require loose, well-drained yes yes S3S4 --- bombifrons toad soils such as those found in floodplains, prairies, or loess hills.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-10

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-3 Cont'd

Preferred ROW within Habitat in Species Vicinity of Provincial Additional Scientific Name Common Name Preferred Habitat Range ROW Rank1 Designations FISH Acipenser lake sturgeon Bottom of gravelly tributary yes yes S2S3 G3G42, 3 fulvescens streams of rivers and lakes. Endangered Ichthyomyzon chestnut lamprey Medium and large rivers. range map yes S3S4 Special castaneus unavailable Concern3 Lepomis gibbosus pumpkinseed Lakes, reservoirs, ponds, yes yes S1 --- sloughs, and sluggish streams Macrhybopsis silver chub Large, moderate flow rivers yes yes S3 Special storeriana with a substrate of silt or Concern3,5 sand, but sometimes gravel, rubble, boulder or bedrock. INVERTEBRATES Danaus plexippus monarch Wherever milkweed and yes yes S5 Special wildflowers exist. This Concern3,5 includes abandoned farmland, along roadsides, and other open spaces where these plants grow.

Sources: Banfield 1974, Behler and King 1979, COSEWIC 2007, Environment Canada 2006c, Godfrey 1986, MB CDC 2006a,b, NatureServe 2007, Scott and Crossman 1973 Notes: 1. Provincial (S) ranks are based solely on the species' status within the province, and range from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions) (MB CEC 2006a,b, NatureServe 2007). S1 = Critically Imperilled: because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 5 or fewer occurrences or very few remaining individuals (<1,000). S2 = Imperilled: because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 6-20 occurrences or few remaining individuals (1,000-3,000). S3 = Vulnerable: because rare and uncommon, or found in a restricted range (even if abundant at some locations), or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. Typically 21-100 occurrences or between 3,000 and 10,000 individuals. S4 = Apparently Secure: uncommon but not rare, and usually widespread in the province. Possible cause of long-term concern. Usually more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S5 = Secure: common, widespread, and abundant in the province. Essentially ineradicable under present conditions. Typically with considerably more than 100 occurrences and more than 10,000 individuals. S#S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. Q = Questionable taxonomy: taxonomic status is questionable; numeric rank may change with taxonomy. B = Breeding: basic rank refers to the breeding population of a migratory species in the element. N = Non-breeding: basic rank refers to the non-breeding population of a migratory species in the element. T = Designates a rank associated with a subspecies. NA = Not Applicable: a conservation status is not applicable because the species is not a suitable target for conservation activities. NR = Rank has not yet been assigned. H = Historical occurrence; usually not verified in the last 20 years, but with some expectation that it may be rediscovered. U = Unrankable: currently unrankable due to lack of information or due to substantially conflicting information about status or trends. ? = Inexact numeric rank: denotes inexact numeric rank.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-11

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

TABLE 5C-3 Cont'd

2. Global (G) ranks are based on species status world-wide and follow a system parallel to that for Provincial Ranks (Note 1), ranging from 1 (5 or fewer occurrences) to 5 (demonstrably secure under present conditions). Only Global Ranks of concern (G1 to G3) or questionable ranks are displayed (NatureServe 2007). 3. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC 2007). Species listed as 'Extirpated', 'Not at Risk' or 'Data Deficient' were generally not included in the table without other noteworthy factors being present. Endangered: A species facing imminent extirpation or extinction. Threatened: A species likely to become endangered if limiting factors are not reversed. 4. Manitoba Endangered Species Act Endangered: any native Manitoba species that is threatened to disappear throughout all or most of its Manitoba range. Threatened: any native Manitoba species likely to become endangered or at risk due to low or declining numbers in Manitoba if the factors affecting it do not improve. 5. Species at Risk Act. The Act establishes Schedule 1 as the list of species to be protected on all federal lands in Canada. Endangered: a species that is facing imminent extirpation or extinction Threatened: a species that is likely to become an endangered species if nothing is done to reverse the factors leading to its extirpation or extinction.

February 2007 4663 Page 5C-12

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D

WATER WELLS IN THE VICINITY OF THE PROPOSED LSr PIPELINE ROUTE

KP Legal Location Type of Use 959 20-9-28W Domestic 959 SE20-9-28W Domestic 959 SE20-9-28W Domestic 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 SE20-9-28W --- 959 NE17-9-28W --- 970.5 NE16-9-27W --- 970.5 NE16-9-27W --- 970.5 NE16-9-27W --- 970.5 NE16-9-27W --- 970.5 NE16-9-27W --- 975 12-9-27W --- 975 12-9-27W --- 980 NW9-9-26W Domestic 985 NW1-9-26W Domestic, Livestock 987.5 SE7-9-25W Domestic, Livestock 991 NE4-9-25W Domestic, Livestock 994 NE2-9-25W --- 999 NE5-9-24W Livestock 999 NE5-9-24W Domestic, Livestock 1002.5 NE3-9-24W Livestock 1002.5 SE3-9-24W Domestic, Livestock 1002.5 SE3-9-24W Domestic, Livestock 1002.5 SE3-9-24W Livestock 1004.5 SE2-9-24W Domestic, Livestock 1004.5 SE2-9-24W Domestic, Livestock 1005 NW36-8-24W Domestic, Livestock 1008.5 SW32-8-23W --- 1017 SW30-8-22W --- 1020.5 SW28-8-22W --- 1020.5 SW28-8-22W --- 1021.5 NE21-8-22W --- 1022 NW22-8-22W --- 1024 SW23-8-22W Livestock 1024 SW23-8-22W Domestic 1024 SW23-8-22W Domestic, Livestock 1024 SW23-8-22W Domestic, Livestock 1024 SW23-8-22W Domestic, Livestock

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-1

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1025.5 SW24-8-22W Domestic, Livestock 1030.5 NW16-8-21W --- 1031.5 SE16-8-21W Livestock 1031.5 SE16-8-21W --- 1033 NE15-8-21W Livestock 1033 NE15-8-21W Livestock 1033 NE15-8-21W Livestock 1033 NE15-8-21W Livestock 1033 SE15-8-21W Livestock 1033 SE15-8-21W --- 1034.5 SE14-8-21W --- 1034 SW14-8-21W Domestic 1035.5 SW13-8-21W Domestic 1035.5 SW13-8-21W Livestock 1035.5 SW13-8-21W Domestic 1036 NW12-8-21W --- 1037 NW7-8-20W Domestic 1038 SE7-8-20W Domestic, Livestock 1038 SE7-8-20W --- 1039.5 NE8-8-20W Industrial 1039.5 NE8-8-20W Domestic 1040 SE8-8-20W Domestic 1041.5 SE9-8-20W --- 1040.5 SW9-8-20W Domestic 1040.5 SW9-8-20W Livestock 1043 10-8-20W Domestic 1043 10-8-20W Domestic 1043 SE10-8-20W Domestic 1043 SE10-8-20W --- 1043.5 NE3-8-20W Domestic, Livestock 1045 NE2-8-20W Domestic, Livestock 1045 NE2-8-20W Municipal 1045 NE2-8-20W --- 1047 NW6-8-19W --- 1047 NW6-8-19W --- 1047 NW6-8-19W --- 1047.5 SW6-8-19W --- 1049 SW5-8-19W Domestic 1051.5 SE4-8-19W --- 1051.5 SE4-8-19W --- 1051.5 SE4-8-19W Domestic 1051.5 SE4-8-19W --- 1051.5 SE4-8-19W --- 1051.5 SE4-8-19W --- 1051 SW4-8-19W --- 1051 SW4-8-19W Livestock 1053 NE34-7-19W Domestic, Livestock 1053 NE34-7-19W Domestic, Livestock 1053 NE34-7-19W Livestock 1052.5 NW34-7-19W Domestic, Livestock

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-2

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1054 NW35-7-19W Domestic, Livestock 1054 NW35-7-19W --- 1054 NW35-7-19W Livestock 1054 NW35-7-19W Livestock 1054 SW35-7-19W Domestic, Livestock 1056.5 SE36-7-19W Domestic, Livestock 1056.5 SE36-7-19W Livestock 1056.5 SE36-7-19 Livestock 1056.5 SE36-7-19W Domestic 1058 NE31-7-18W Domestic, Livestock 1061 28-7-18W Domestic 1061 28-7-18W Domestic 1061 28-7-18W Domestic 1061 28-7-18W Domestic 1061 28-7-18W Domestic 1061 28-7-18W Domestic 1061 28-7-18W --- 1061.5 NE28-7-18W Domestic 1061.5 NE28-7-18W --- 1061.5 NE28-7-18W --- 1061 NW28-7-18W --- 1061 NW28-7-18W Domestic 1061 NW28-7-18W --- 1065 SE26-7-18W --- 1064 SW26-7-18W --- 1064 SW26-7-18W --- 1067.5 NW30-7-17W Domestic 1072 NE21-7-17W --- 1072 NE21-7-17W --- 1073.5 SE22-7-17W Domestic 1073.5 SE22-7-17W --- 1073.5 SE22-7-17W --- 1075 NE23-7-17W --- 1075 NE23-7-17W Domestic 1074.5 SW23-7-17W Domestic, Livestock 1082 SE16-7-16W Domestic, Livestock 1085 SE14-7-16W Domestic, Livestock 1087 SE13-7-16W Domestic 1087.5 SW18-7-15W --- 1087.5 SW18-7-15W Irrigation 1087.5 SW18-7-15W --- 1089.5 NW8-7-15W Domestic 1092.5 SW10-7-15W Irrigation 1092.5 SW10-7-15W --- 1092.5 SW10-7-15W --- 1092.5 SW10-7-15W --- 1092.5 SW10-7-15W --- 1092.5 SW10-7-15W Irrigation 1092.5 SW10-7-15W --- 1092.5 SW10-7-15W Irrigation

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-3

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1092.5 SW10-7-15W --- 1092.5 SW10-7-15W Irrigation 1092.5 SW10-7-15W Irrigation 1092.5 SW10-7-15W Irrigation 1104.5 SW2-7-14W Domestic, Livestock 1104.5 SW2-7-14W Domestic, Livestock 1104.5 SW2-7-14W Domestic, Livestock 1108.5 NW31-6-13W Domestic, Livestock 1114 SW27-6-13W --- 1114 SW27-6-13W Domestic, Livestock 1114 SW27-6-13W Domestic 1116 SW26-6-13W Domestic 1116 SW26-6-13W --- 1116 23-6-13W Livestock 1120 SE19-6-12W Domestic, Livestock 1121.5 17-6-12W Domestic 1121.5 17-6-12W --- 1121 NW17-6-12W Domestic, Livestock 1124 NE9-6-12W Livestock 1124 NE9-6-12W Domestic, Livestock 1125 NW10-6-12W Livestock 1125 NW10-6-12W Domestic, Livestock 1125 NW10-6-12W Livestock 1125 NW10-6-12W --- 1125 NW10-6-12W Domestic, Livestock 1127.5 SE11-6-12W Livestock 1127.5 SE11-6-12W Domestic, Livestock 1126.5 SW11-6-12W Livestock 1126.5 SW11-6-12W Livestock 1126.5 SW11-6-12W Livestock 1133 NE32-5-11W Domestic, Livestock 1135 NE28-5-11W Domestic, Livestock 1135 NE28-5-11W Domestic 1135 NE28-5-11W Livestock 1135 NE28-5-11W --- 1136 SW27-5-11W Domestic 1136 SW27-5-11W Municipal 1136 SW27-5-11W --- 1136 SW27-5-11W --- 1138.5 SE26-5-11W --- 1137.5 SW26-5-11W Domestic 1137.5 SW26-5-11W Domestic 1138 23-5-11W Domestic 1138 23-5-11W Domestic 1139 NE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 NE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 NE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 NE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 NE23-5-11W Livestock 1138 NW23-5-11W Domestic

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-4

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1138 NW23-5-11W Domestic 1139 SE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 SE23-5-11W Domestic, Livestock 1139 SE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 SE23-5-11W Domestic, Livestock 1139 SE23-5-11W Domestic 1139 SE23-5-11W Domestic 1139.5 NW24-5-11W Domestic 1139.5 NW24-5-11W Livestock 1142 NE19-5-10W --- 1141 NW19-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1141 NW19-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1141 NW19-5-10W Domestic 1141 NW19-5-10W --- 1142 SE19-5-10W Domestic, Industrial 1141 SW19-5-10W --- 1142 NE18-5-10W Domestic 1141 NW18-5-10W Domestic 1141 NW18-5-10W --- 1143 NW17-5-10W --- 1143 NW17-5-10W --- 1145 NW16-5-10W Livestock 1145 NW9-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1145 SW9-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1147.5 SE10-5-10W Livestock 1148.5 NW11-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1148.5 NW11-5-10W Domestic 1148.5 NW2-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1148.5 SW2-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1148.5 SW2-5-10W Livestock 1151.5 SE1-5-10W Domestic, Livestock 1153 6-5-9W Domestic 1152 NW6-5-9W Domestic 1154 NW32-4-9W Domestic 1156 SW33-4-9W Domestic, Livestock 1159 NE34-4-9W Domestic 1159 NE34-4-9W Domestic, Livestock 1159 NE34-4-9W --- 1156 SW28-4-9W Domestic 1156 SW28-4-9W --- 1159 NE27-4-9W Domestic, Livestock 1159 SE27-4-9W Domestic 1159.5 NW26-4-9W Domestic, Livestock 1160 SW26-4-9W Domestic, Livestock 1160 NW23-4-9W --- 1160 NW23-4-9W Municipal 1160 NW23-4-9W Municipal 1162 24-4-9W Domestic 1161.5 NW24-4-9W Domestic 1162 SW24-4-9W Livestock

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-5

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1162 SW24-4-9W Livestock 1164.5 NE18-4-8W Livestock 1166 17-4-8W Livestock 1166 NE17-4-8W Domestic, Livestock 1166 NE17-4-8W --- 1166 NE17-4-8W --- 1166 NE17-4-8W Livestock 1165.5 NW17-4-8W Domestic 1167 NW16-4-8W Domestic 1168 SE16-4-8W Livestock 1168 SE16-4-8W Domestic 1168 9-4-8W Livestock 1169.5 10-4-8W --- 1169 NW10-4-8W --- 1169 NW10-4-8W Domestic 1169 NW10-4-8W Domestic, Livestock 1172 NE11-4-8W Domestic 1172 SE2-4-8W Domestic 1172 SE2-4-8W Domestic, Livestock 1173 1-4-8W Domestic 1173 SW1-4-8W Domestic, Livestock 1173 SW1-4-8W Livestock 1174.5 SW6-4-7W Livestock 1174.5 SW6-4-7W Domestic, Livestock 1174.5 SW6-4-7W Domestic, Livestock 1174.5 SW6-4-7W Domestic 1174.5 SW6-4-7W Domestic 1174.5 SW6-4-7W Livestock 1176 SE31-3-7W Livestock 1177.5 SE32-3-7W Domestic, Livestock 1177.5 SE32-3-7W Domestic, Livestock 1179.5 NE28-3-7W Domestic, Livestock 1178.5 NW28-3-7W Domestic, Livestock 1178.5 NW28-3-7W Domestic, Livestock 1178.5 NW28-3-7W Domestic 1179 SE28-3-7W Livestock 1181 NE27-3-7W Domestic, Livestock 1180 NW27-3-7W Domestic 1183 SE23-3-7W Domestic 1186.5 SE18-3-6W Domestic 1186.5 SE18-3-6W Domestic, Livestock 1186 SW18-3-6W Domestic 1190 NE16-3-6W Livestock 1190 NE16-3-6W --- 1190 NE16-3-6W Domestic 1190 SE16-3-6W --- 1190 NE9-3-6W Livestock 1190 NE9-3-6W --- 1189 NW9-3-6W Livestock 1189 NW9-3-6W Domestic, Livestock

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-6

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1189 NW9-3-6W --- 1192 NE10-3-6W Domestic 1192 SE10-3-6W Domestic, Livestock 1192 SE10-3-6W Domestic 1192 SE10-3-6W --- 1192 SE10-3-6W --- 1192 SE10-3-6W --- 1192 SE10-3-6W --- 1192 SE10-3-6W --- 1192 SE10-3-6W --- 1194 SE11-3-6W Domestic 1193 NW2-3-6W Domestic, Livestock 1193.5 NW35-2-6W Domestic 1193.5 NW35-2-6W Domestic 1193.5 NW35-2-6W Domestic 1193.5 NW35-2-6W --- 1193.5 NW35-2-6W --- 1193.5 NW35-2-6W --- 1195.5 NW36-2-6W Livestock 1198 NE31-2-5W --- 1199 32-2-5W Domestic 1199.5 NE32-2-5W --- 1199.5 NE32-2-5W Livestock 1199.5 NE32-2-5W Livestock 1199.5 NE32-2-5W --- 1199.5 NE32-2-5W --- 1199 NW32-2-5W Domestic, Livestock 1200.5 NW33-2-5W Domestic 1200.5 NW33-2-5W Domestic, Livestock 1200.5 NW33-2-5W --- 1200.5 NW33-2-5W --- 1200.5 NW33-2-5W Domestic 1200.5 NW33-2-5W Domestic 1202 NW34-2-5W Livestock 1203 SE34-2-5W --- 1203 SE34-2-5W Domestic 1202 SW34-2-5W --- 1202 SW34-2-5W --- 1202 SW34-2-5W Domestic 1202 SW34-2-5W --- 1202.5 NW27-2-5W Domestic 1202.5 SW27-2-5W --- 1202.5 SW27-2-5W Livestock 1206.5 NE25-2-5W Domestic, Livestock 1206.5 NE25-2-5W Domestic, Livestock 1206.5 NE25-2-5W --- 1206.5 NE25-2-5W --- 1206.5 NE25-2-5W --- 1206.5 NE25-2-5W --- 1206.5 NE25-2-5W ---

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-7

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1206.5 NE25-2-5W --- 1206.5 SE25-2-5W Domestic 1206.5 SE25-2-5W --- 1206.5 SE25-2-5W Domestic 1208.5 NE19-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1208.5 SE19-2-4W --- 1208.5 SE19-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1208.5 SE19-2-4W --- 1208.5 SE19-2-4W Livestock 1208.5 SE19-2-4W Domestic 1208.5 SE19-2-4W Domestic 1208.5 SE19-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1208.5 SE19-2-4W --- 1208.5 SE19-2-4W --- 1208.5 SE19-2-4W --- 1209.5 20-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 20-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 20-2-4W --- 1209 SW20-2-4W Domestic 1209 SW20-2-4W --- 1209 SW20-2-4W Domestic 1209 SW20-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209 SW20-2-4W --- 1209 SW20-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209 SW20-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209 SW20-2-4W Domestic 1211.5 21-2-4W Domestic 1211 NW21-2-4W Domestic 1212 SE21-2-4W Domestic 1212 SE21-2-4W Domestic 1212 SE21-2-4W Domestic 1211 SW21-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1211 SW21-2-4W Domestic 1211 SW21-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1211 SW21-2-4W Domestic 1211 SW21-2-4W Domestic 1211 SW21-2-4W Domestic 1211.5 16-2-4W Domestic 1212 NE16-2-4W --- 1212 NE16-2-4W --- 1211 NW16-2-4W Domestic 1211 NW16-2-4W --- 1211 NW16-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1211 NW16-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1211 NW16-2-4W --- 1211 NW16-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1212 SE16-2-4W Domestic 1212 SE16-2-4W Livestock 1212 SE16-2-4W Domestic 1212 SE16-2-4W Domestic

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-8

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1210 17-2-4W Domestic 1210 17-2-4W Livestock 1210 NE17-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209.5 NW17-2-4W Livestock 1209.5 NW17-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 NW17-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 NW17-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 NW17-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 NW17-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209.5 NW17-2-4W --- 1209.5 NW17-2-4W --- 1210 SE17-2-4W Livestock 1210 SE17-2-4W Domestic 1209.5 SW17-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209.5 SW17-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1209.5 SW17-2-4W --- 1209.5 SW17-2-4W --- 1209.5 SW17-2-4W --- 1209.5 SW17-2-4W --- 1213.5 15-2-4W --- 1214 NE15-2-4W Domestic 1213 NW15-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1214 SE15-2-4W --- 1213 SW15-2-4W Industrial 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1213 SW15-2-4W --- 1213 SW15-2-4W Domestic 1216 NE14-2-4W Domestic 1215 NW14-2-4W Domestic 1215 NW14-2-4W Livestock 1215 NW14-2-4W --- 1216 SE14-2-4W Livestock, Air Conditioning 1216 SE14-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1216 SE14-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1216 SE14-2-4W --- 1216 SE14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W ---

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-9

Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Southern Lights Project Enbridge Southern Lights LP Volume II

APPENDIX 5D Cont'd

KP Legal Location Type of Use 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W Municipal 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215 SW14-2-4W --- 1215.5 11-2-4W Livestock 1215 NW11-2-4W Domestic 1215 NW11-2-4W --- 1216 SE11-2-4W Domestic 1216 SE11-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1216 SE11-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1216 SE11-2-4W --- 1217 SW12-2-4W Livestock 1217 SW12-2-4W --- 1217 SW12-2-4W Domestic, Livestock 1223 NE4-2-3W Domestic 1222 NW4-2-3W Domestic 1226 NW26-1-3W --- 1229 SW19-1-2W --- 1243 NE5-1-1W --- 1243 SE5-1-1W ---

February 2007 4663 Page 5D-10