sign in sign up
<<
Home , Hengshui, Huanghua, Wuqiao County, Yiwu, Yuhuan

53856 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices

Tianjin Master Fastener Co., Ltd. (a/k/a Yazheng Importing; Chentai International Trading Co., Master Fastener Co., Ltd.); Zhangjiagang Lianfeng Metals Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Mei Jia Hua Trade Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; Tianjin Jurun Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Metals and Minerals; Zhangjiagang Longxiang Packing Materials Tianjin Xiantong Material & Trade Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Port Free Trade Zone Xiangtong Intl. Co., Ltd.; Tradex Group, Inc.; Industry & Trade Corp.; Hungyan Xingzhou Industria; Wintime Import & Export Corporation Tianjin Products & Energy Resources dev. Zhejiang Nail Factory; Limited of Zhongshan; Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Minmetals Sanhe Imp & Exp Co.; Wuhu Shijie Hardware Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Qichuan Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Qifeng Hardware Make Co., Ltd.; Wuhu Sin Lan De Industrial Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Ruiji Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Taizhou Eagle Machinery Co.; Chengye Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Senbohengtong International; Zhejiang Huishun Import/Export Co., CIP International Group Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Senmiao Import and Export Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; Yitian Hardware Co., Ltd. Tianjin Shenyuan Steel Producting Group Zhongshan Junlong Nail Manufactures Co., [FR Doc. 2012–21708 Filed 8–31–12; 8:45 am] Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Tianjin Shishun Metal Product Co., Ltd.; ZJG Lianfeng Metals Product Ltd. Tianjin Shishun Metallic Products Co., Ltd.; Appendix III Tianjin Xiantong Fucheng Gun Nail DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Manufacture Co., Ltd.; Companies that filed no-shipment Tianjin Xiantong Juxiang Metal MFG Co., certifications, collectively (‘‘No Shipment International Trade Administration Ltd.; Respondents’’): Tianjin Xinyuansheng Metal Products Co., (1) Jining Huarong Hardware Products Co., [A–570–893] Ltd.; Ltd.; Tianjin Yihao Metallic Products Co., Ltd.; (2) Chiieh Yung Metal Ind. Corp.; Administrative Review of Certain Tianjin Yongchang Metal Product Co., Ltd.; (3) CYM (Nanjing) Nail Manufacture Co., Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Tianjin Yongxu Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; People’s Republic of : Final Tianjin Yongye Furniture; (4) Qidong Liang Chyuan Metal Industry Co., Results, Partial Rescission of Sixth Tianjin Yongyi Standard Parts Production Ltd.; Co., Ltd.; Antidumping Duty Administrative (5) Certified Products International Inc. Review and Determination Not To Tianjin Zhong Jian Wanli Stone Co., Ltd.; (‘‘CPI’’); Tianjin Zhongsheng Garment Co., Ltd.; (6) Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Revoke in Part Tianwoo Logistics Developing Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; AGENCY: Import Administration, Topocean Consolidation Service (CHA) Ltd.; (7) China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., International Trade Administration, Traser Mexicana, S.A. De C.V.; Ltd.; Treasure Way International Dev. Ltd.; (8) Zhejiang Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Department of Commerce. True Value Company (HK) Ltd.; Co., Ltd.; SUMMARY: On March 2, 2012, the Unicatch Industrial Co. Ltd.; (9) PT Enterprise Inc.; Department of Commerce Unigain Trading Co., Ltd.; (10) Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., (‘‘Department’’) published in the Vinin Industries Limited; Ltd.; Federal Register the Preliminary Results KLF Medical Plastics Co., Lt.; (11) Mingyao Hardware & Mesh of the sixth administrative review Wenzhou Ouxin Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; Products Co., Ltd. (‘‘Hengshui Mingyao’’); (‘‘AR’’) of the antidumping duty order Wenzhou Yuwei Foreign Trade Co., Ltd.; (12) Union Enterprise (Kunshan) Co., Ltd. Winsmart International Shipping Ltd., O/B on certain frozen warmwater shrimp Zhaoqing Harvest Nails Co., Ltd.; Appendix IV from the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’).1 We gave interested parties an Worldwide Logistics Co., Ltd., (Tianjin Companies that did not apply for separate Branch); rates and are considered to be part of the opportunity to comment on the Xinxin Native Produce & Animal By- PRC-wide entity: Preliminary Results. Based upon our Products Mfg. Co. Ltd.; Aironware () Co., Ltd.; analysis of the comments and Wuhu Sheng Zhi Industrial Co., Ltd.; Hong Sheng Metal Products Co., Ltd.; information received, we have Huifeng Hardware Products Beijing Hongsheng Metal Products Co., Ltd.; determined that the application of total Factory; Dagang Zhitong Metal Products Co., Ltd.; adverse facts available (‘‘AFA’’) to Wuqiao County Sinchuang Hardware Faithful Engineering Products Co., Ltd.; Hilltop,2 as part of the PRC-wide entity, Products Factory; Minmetals Co., Ltd.; 108 Wuqiao County Huifeng Hardware is appropriate in this review. Hong Kong Yu Xi Co., Ltd.; Additionally, we continue to find that Production Co., Ltd.; Shenghua Hardware Manufactory Wuxi Baolin Nail Enterprises; Regal Integrated Marine Factory; Resources Co., Ltd. (‘‘Regal’’) has not Wuxi Baolin Nail-Making Machinery Co., Huanghua Xinda Nail Production Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; Huanghua Yuftai Hardware Products Co., sold subject merchandise at less than Wuxi Colour Nail Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; normal value (‘‘NV’’) during the period Wuxi Jinde Assets Management Co., Ltd.; Senco-Xingya Metal Products (Taicang) Co., of review (‘‘POR’’), February 1, 2010, Wuxi Moresky Developing Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; through January 31, 2011. Wuxi Qiangye Metal work Production Co., Shanghai Seti Enterprise International Co., DATES: Effective Date: September 4, Ltd.; Ltd.; 2012. Xi’an Steel; New Kunlun Trade Co., Shanghai Tengyu Hardware Tools Co., Ltd.; Ltd.; Shanxi Tianli Enterprise Co., Ltd.; FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob XL Metal Works Co., Ltd.; XM International, Chengye Metal Producting Co., Palmer and Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Inc.; Ltd.; Yeswin Corporation; Shouguang Meiqing Nail Industry Co., Ltd.; 1 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Yiwu Dongshun Toys Manufacture; Suntec Industries Co., Ltd.; People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results, Yiwu Excellent Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Xingya Nail Co., Ltd.; Partial Rescission, Extension of Time Limits for the Yiwu Jiehang Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Suzhou Yaotian Metal Products Co., Ltd.; Final Results, and Intent to Revoke, in Part, of the Sixth Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 77 Yiwu Qiaoli Import & Export Co., Ltd.; Shandex Industrial Inc.; Yiwu Richway Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.; FR 12801 (March 2, 2012) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 2 Hilltop International, Yangjiang City Yelin Yiwu Zhongai Toys Co., Ltd.; 108 Hebei, submitted an untimely no shipment Hoitat Quick Frozen Seafood Co., Ltd., Fuqing Yongcheng Foreign Trade Corp.; certification that the Department has rejected (see Yihua Aquatic Food Co., Ltd., Ocean Duke Yu Chi Hardware Co., Ltd.; page 2). Therefore, this company is now considered Corporation and Kingston Foods Corporation Yue Sang Plastic Factory; to be part of the PRC-wide entity. (collectively, ‘‘Hilltop’’).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices 53857

Operations, Office 9, Import Hilltop filed rebuttal briefs with respect 2012, Hilltop submitted its response, Administration, International Trade to the Hilltop issues. which largely consisted of a Administration, U.S. Department of ‘‘Preliminary Statement,’’ in which Background Regarding Hilltop Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Hilltop provided an analysis that Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; On March 12, 2012, Petitioner detailed why Hilltop believes the telephone: (202) 482–9068 and (202) submitted information concerning allegations of misconduct prior to AR4 482–2593, respectively. recent criminal convictions of entities/ are irrelevant to the Department’s SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: persons affiliated with Hilltop and revocation analysis, argued that it is allegations of a transshipment scheme of improper for the Department to Background shrimp through the Kingdom of investigate allegations of transshipment On March 31, 2011, the Department Cambodia (‘‘Cambodia’’) during the first in a review proceeding, and stated its initiated an administrative review of 84 and second administrative reviews of refusal to answer any questions producers/exporters of subject this proceeding. The involved parties regarding it activities prior to AR4.13 merchandise from the PRC.3 In the included Hilltop, Hilltop’s U.S. affiliate Hilltop also stated that it already Preliminary Results, the Department Ocean Duke Corporation (‘‘Ocean disclosed all affiliations to the preliminarily rescinded the review with Duke’’), and Ocean King (Cambodia) Department and that it had no respect to Yuexing Enterprise Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ocean King’’), a Cambodian undisclosed Cambodian affiliate during Company which submitted a no company.9 Between March 29 and May this period of review or the two shipment certification and for which we 16, 2012, interested parties submitted previous review periods (i.e. the have not found any information to comments regarding these allegations. revocation period). contradict this claim.4 Between March 16 and May 16, 2012, On June 19, 2012, the Department As noted above, on March 2, 2012, the interested parties met with Department placed on the record of this review Department published the Preliminary officials to discuss their submissions.10 public registration documentation Results of this administrative review On May 17, 2012, the Department listing To Kam Keung, the General and extended the deadline for the final placed U.S. Customs and Border Manager 14 of Hilltop, as an owner and results by 60 days. On April 26, 2012, Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data on the record of director of Ocean King from September the Petitioner,5 Domestic Processors,6 this review for entries of shrimp to the 2005 through September 2010, i.e. and Hilltop submitted additional United States imported under during AR3–AR5 and through the first surrogate value information. On May 7, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the half of AR6.15 On June 19, 2012, the 2012, Domestic Processors and Hilltop United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) numbers Department also issued to Hilltop a submitted rebuttal surrogate value included in the scope of the Order with supplemental questionnaire requesting information. a country-of-origin designation of that Hilltop respond to those questions On June 19, 2012, the Department Cambodia during the period January 1, which it previously refused to address issued a letter to all interested parties 2003, through May 2, 2012.11 Between and provide additional information establishing June 26, 2012, and July 2, May 24, 2012, and May 31, 2012, related to the public registration 2012, as the case and rebuttal brief interested parties submitted comments documentation for Ocean King.16 On deadlines, respectively, for all issues regarding the Cambodian CBP data. June 26, 2012, Hilltop submitted its except those concerning Hilltop’s U.S. On June 1, 2012, the Department sent response to the Seventh Supplemental sales and request for company-specific Hilltop a supplemental questionnaire Questionnaire and again refused to revocation.7 On June 26, 2012, addressing a number of the allegations answer those questions it deemed Petitioner, Domestic Processors and regarding Hilltop and potentially irrelevant; however Hilltop admitted Hilltop filed case briefs. On July 2, 2012, undisclosed affiliations, as well as other that an affiliation with Ocean King did Petitioner, Domestic Processors, and issues brought to light in Petitioner’s exist from September 2005 until 12 Hilltop filed rebuttal briefs. March 12 Submission. On June 15, September 28, 2010.17 On July 6, 2012, the Department On July 6, 2012, the Department issued a letter to all interested parties 9 See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of placed on the record CBP data for U.S. Commerce ‘‘Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp establishing July 17, 2012, and July 23, from China: Comments On the Department’s imports of subject merchandise from the 2012, as the case and rebuttal brief Preliminary Determination to Grant Hilltop’s PRC for the period February 1, 2007 deadlines, respectively, for issues Request for Company-Specific Revocation Pursuant through January 31, 2008, which is the to 19 C.F.R. § 351.222(b)(2) and Comments in period corresponding with the third pertaining to Hilltop’s U.S. sales and Anticipation of Hilltop’s Forthcoming Verification’’ revocation request.8 On July 17, 2012, (March 12, 2012) (‘‘Petitioner’s March 12 Petitioner, Domestic Processors and Submission’’). 13 See Letter from Hilltop to the Secretary of Hilltop filed case briefs with respect to 10 See Memo to the File from Kabir Archuletta, Commerce ‘‘Hilltop’s Response to June 1, 2012 International Trade Analyst, Office 9, ‘‘Meeting Supplemental Questionnaire’’ (June 15, 2012) the Hilltop issues. On July 23, 2012, with Counsel for Petitioner’’ (March 16, 2012); (‘‘Hilltop Sixth Supplemental Response’’). Petitioner, Domestic Processors and Memo to the File from Kabir Archuletta, 14 See Letter from Hilltop to the Secretary of International Trade Analyst, Office 9, ‘‘Certain Commerce ‘‘Section A Response for Hilltop International in the Sixth Administrative Review of 3 See Initiation of Antidumping Duty Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the Administrative Reviews, Requests for Revocation in Republic of China: Ex Parte Meeting with Counsel for Hilltop International’’ (April 16, 2012); Memo to People’s Republic of China’’ (June 15, 2011) at Part, and Deferral of Administrative Review, 76 FR Exhibit 2. 17825 (March 31, 2011) (‘‘Initiation’’) for a list of the File from Kabir Archuletta, International Trade Analyst, Office 9, ‘‘Certain Frozen Warmwater 15 See Memo to the File from Kabir Archuletta, these companies. Shrimp from the People’s Republic of China: Ex International Trade Analyst, Office 9, ‘‘Public 4 See Preliminary Results at 12803. Parte Meeting with Counsel for Petitioner’’ (May 16, Registration Documents for Ocean King (Cambodia) 5 The Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee 2012). Co., Ltd.’’ (June 19, 2012). (hereinafter referred to as ‘‘Petitioner’’). 11 See Memo to the File from Kabir Archuletta, 16 See Letter from Catherine Bertrand, Program 6 These domestic parties are the American International Trade Analyst, Office 9, ‘‘Customs Manager, Office 9, to Hilltop ‘‘Seventh Shrimp Processors Association (hereinafter referred Data of U.S. Imports of Certain Frozen Warmwater Supplemental Questionnaire’’ (July 19, 2012) to as ‘‘Domestic Processors’’). Shrimp from Cambodia’’ (May 17, 2012). (‘‘Seventh Supplemental Questionnaire’’). 7 See Letter from the Department to All Interested 12 See Letter from the Catherine Bertrand, 17 See Letter from Hilltop to the Secretary of Parties, dated June 19, 2012. Program Manager, Office 9, regarding the Sixth Commerce ‘‘Hilltop’s Response to June 1, 2012 8 See Letter from the Department to All Interested Supplemental Questionnaire (June 1, 2012) Supplemental Questionnaire’’ (June 26, 2012) at pg. Parties, dated July 6, 2012. (‘‘Hilltop Sixth Supplemental Questionnaire’’). 1 (‘‘Hilltop Seventh Supplemental Response’’).

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 53858 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices

administrative review of this 0306.23.0040); (4) shrimp and prawns in description of the scope of the order is proceeding. On July 11, 2012, Petitioner prepared meals (HTS subheading dispositive. submitted comments on the AR3 CBP 1605.20.0510); (5) dried shrimp and Final Partial Rescission data.18 prawns; (6) Lee Kum Kee’s shrimp sauce; (7) canned warmwater shrimp In the Preliminary Results, the Scope of the Order and prawns (HTS subheading Department preliminarily rescinded this The scope of the order includes 1605.20.1040); (8) certain dusted review with respect to Shantou Yuexing certain frozen warmwater shrimp and shrimp;20 and (9) certain battered Enterprise Company. The Department prawns, whether wild-caught (ocean shrimp. Dusted shrimp is a shrimp- determined that it had no shipments of harvested) or farm-raised (produced by based product: (1) That is produced subject merchandise to the United aquaculture), head-on or head-off, shell- from fresh (or thawed-from-frozen) and States during the POR.21 Subsequent to on or peeled, tail-on or tail-off,19 peeled shrimp; (2) to which a ‘‘dusting’’ the Preliminary Results, no information deveined or not deveined, cooked or layer of rice or wheat flour of at least 95 was submitted on the record indicating raw, or otherwise processed in frozen percent purity has been applied; (3) that it made sales to the United States form. with the entire surface of the shrimp of subject merchandise during the POR The frozen warmwater shrimp and flesh thoroughly and evenly coated with and no party provided written prawn products included in the scope of the flour; (4) with the non-shrimp arguments regarding this issue. Thus, in the order, regardless of definitions in content of the end product constituting accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the between four and 10 percent of the and consistent with our practice, we are United States (‘‘HTS’’), are products product’s total weight after being rescinding this review with respect to which are processed from warmwater dusted, but prior to being frozen; and (5) Shantou Yuexing Enterprise Company. shrimp and prawns through freezing that is subjected to individually quick Analysis of Comments Received and which are sold in any count size. frozen (‘‘IQF’’) freezing immediately The products described above may be after application of the dusting layer. All issues raised in the case and processed from any species of Battered shrimp is a shrimp-based rebuttal briefs by parties to this review warmwater shrimp and prawns. product that, when dusted in are addressed in the ‘‘Sixth Warmwater shrimp and prawns are accordance with the definition of Administrative Review of Frozen generally classified in, but are not dusting above, is coated with a wet Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s limited to, the Penaeidae family. Some viscous layer containing egg and/or Republic of China: Issues and Decision examples of the farmed and wild-caught milk, and par-fried. Memorandum for the Final Results,’’ warmwater species include, but are not The products covered by the order are which is dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘I&D Memo’’). A list of the limited to, white-leg shrimp (Penaeus currently classified under the following issues that parties raised and to which vannemei), banana prawn (Penaeus HTS subheadings: 0306.13.0003, we respond in the I&D Memo is attached merguiensis), fleshy prawn (Penaeus 0306.13.0006, 0306.13.0009, to this notice as Appendix I. The I&D chinensis), giant river prawn 0306.13.0012, 0306.13.0015, Memo is a public document and is on (Macrobrachium rosenbergii), giant tiger 0306.13.0018, 0306.13.0021, file in the Central Records Unit prawn (Penaeus monodon), redspotted 0306.13.0024, 0306.13.0027, (‘‘CRU’’), Main Commerce Building, shrimp (Penaeus brasiliensis), southern 0306.13.0040, 0306.17.0003, Room 7046, and is accessible on the brown shrimp (Penaeus subtilis), 0306.17.0006, 0306.17.0009, Department’s Web site at http:// southern pink shrimp (Penaeus 0306.17.0012, 0306.17.0015, www.trade.gov/ia. The paper copy and notialis), southern rough shrimp 0306.17.0018, 0306.17.0021, 0306.17.0024, 0306.17.0027, electronic version of the memorandum (Trachypenaeus curvirostris), southern are identical in content. white shrimp (Penaeus schmitti), blue 0306.17.0040, 1605.20.1010, shrimp (Penaeus stylirostris), western 1605.20.1030, 1605.21.1030, and Changes Since the Preliminary Results white shrimp (Penaeus occidentalis), 1605.29.1010. These HTS subheadings are provided for convenience and for Based on a review of the record as and Indian white prawn (Penaeus well as comments received from parties indicus). customs purposes only and are not dispositive, but rather the written regarding our Preliminary Results, we Frozen shrimp and prawns that are made three revisions to Regal’s margin packed with marinade, spices or sauce calculation for the final results. First, we are included in the scope of the order. 20 On April 26, 2011, the Department amended the antidumping duty order to include dusted have corrected an inadvertent error in In addition, food preparations, which shrimp, pursuant to the U.S. Court of International the calculation of the ice surrogate value are not ‘‘prepared meals,’’ that contain Trade (‘‘CIT’’’) decision in Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade used in the Preliminary Results. For more than 20 percent by weight of Action Committee v. United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010) and the U.S. International Trade further information see I&D Memo at shrimp or prawn are also included in Commission (‘‘ITC’’’) determination, which found Comment 14; see also Final SV Memo.22 the scope of the order. the domestic like product to include dusted shrimp. Additionally, we have included Excluded from the scope are: (1) Because the amendment of the antidumping duty Kongphop Frozen Foods Company Ltd. Breaded shrimp and prawns (HTS order occurred after this POR, dusted shrimp continue to be excluded in this review. See Certain (‘‘Kongphop’’) and Sea Bonanza Frozen subheading 1605.20.1020); (2) shrimp Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, India, the Foods Company Limited (‘‘Sea and prawns generally classified in the People’s Republic of China, Thailand, and the Bonanza’’) financial statements to Pandalidae family and commonly Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Amended calculate the surrogate financial ratios, Antidumping Duty Orders in Accordance with Final referred to as coldwater shrimp, in any Court Decision, 76 FR 23277 (April 26, 2011); see state of processing; (3) fresh shrimp and also Ad Hoc Shrimp Trade Action Committee v. 21 See Preliminary Results at 12801, 12803. prawns whether shell-on or peeled (HTS United States, 703 F. Supp. 2d 1330 (CIT 2010) and 22 See Memorandum to the File through Catherine subheadings 0306.23.0020 and Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from Brazil, China, Bertrand, Program Manager, Office 9 from Bob India, Thailand, and Vietnam (Investigation Nos. Palmer, Case Analyst, Office 9; Sixth 731–TA–1063, 1064, 1066–1068 (Review), USITC Administrative Review of Certain Frozen 18 See Letter from Petitioner to the Secretary of Publication 4221, March 2011. However, we note Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Republic of Commerce. that this review only covers suspended entries that China: Surrogate Factor Valuations for the Final 19 ‘‘Tails’’ in this context means the tail fan, did not include dusted shrimp, but cash deposits Results, (‘‘Final SV Memo’’) dated concurrently which includes the telson and the uropods. going forward will apply to dusted shrimp. with this notice.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices 53859

because they are processors of frozen cannot determine that this single entity that Hilltop withheld information that shrimp and their financial statements of affiliated companies, of which Hilltop has been requested, failed to submit are contemporaneous and complete and is a part, has met the criteria for a information in a timely manner, indicate that they are unsubsidized. For separate rate. Therefore, we are not significantly impeded this proceeding, further information see I&D Memo at granting a separate rate to Hilltop and and provided information that could not Comment 12; see also Final SV Memo. its affiliates and we find Hilltop to be be verified,26 pursuant to sections We have also corrected various errors part of the PRC-wide entity. 776(a)(1) and (2)(A), (B), (C) and (D) of related to the calculation of the the Tariff Act of 1930, the Department Facts Otherwise Available surrogate financial ratios using the is using the facts otherwise available. financial statements of Kiang Huat Sea Sections 776(a)(1) and 776(a)(2) of the For a more detailed discussion of the Gull Trading Frozen Food Public Co. Act provide that if necessary Department’s determination, see I&D Ltd. (‘‘Kiang Huat’’). For further information is not available on the Memo at Comment 1 and Hilltop AFA information see I&D Memo at Comment record, or if an interested party (A) Memo.27 Further, because we determine 13; see also Final SV Memo. The withholds information that has been that the entirety of Hilltop’s data are Department’s determination to find requested by the Department; (B) fails to unusable, we also find that Hilltop has Hilltop to be part of the PRC-wide entity provide such information in a timely failed to demonstrate that it is eligible and deny its company-specific manner or in the form or manner for a separate rate and is therefore part revocation request from the Order are requested subject to sections 782(c)(1) of the PRC-wide entity. Accordingly, we discussed below. and (e) of the Act; (C) significantly are assigning facts available to the PRC- impedes a proceeding under the wide entity, of which Hilltop is a part. Separate Rates antidumping statute; or (D) provides In our Preliminary Results, we such information but the information Adverse Facts Available preliminarily determined that Regal met cannot be verified, then the Department When relying on facts otherwise the criteria for the application of a shall, subject to subsection 782(d) of the available, the Department may apply an separate rate.23 We have not received Act, use facts otherwise available in adverse inference. Section 776(b) of the any information since the issuance of reaching the applicable determination. Act states that if the Department ‘‘finds the Preliminary Results that provides a Section 782(d) of the Act provides that an interested party has failed to basis for the reconsideration of this that, if the Department determines that cooperate by not acting to the best of its determination. Therefore, the a response to a request for information ability to comply with a request for Department continues to find that Regal does not comply with the request, the information from the administering meets the criteria for a separate rate. Department will inform the person authority * * * {the Department} *** Further, while we preliminarily submitting the response of the nature of may use an inference that is adverse to determined that Hilltop had satisfied the deficiency and shall, to the extent the interests of the party in selecting the criteria for the application of a practicable, provide that person the from among the facts otherwise separate rate in the Preliminary Results, opportunity to remedy or explain the available.’’ 28 Adverse inferences are based on information subsequently deficiency. If that person submits appropriate to ‘‘ensure that the party placed on the record, for these final further information that continues to be does not obtain a more favorable result results we find that Hilltop’s separate unsatisfactory, or this information is not by failing to cooperate than if it had rate information is no longer reliable or submitted within the applicable time cooperated fully.’’ 29 In selecting an usable and Hilltop has failed to limits, then the Department may, subject adverse inference, the Department may demonstrate its eligibility for a separate to section 782(e) of the Act, disregard all rely on information derived from the rate. In PRC Shrimp AR5, we found or part of the original and subsequent petition, the final determination in the Hilltop to be part of a single entity, responses, as appropriate. investigation, any previous review, or which included affiliates in a third Section 782(e) of the Act states that any other information placed on the country that had extensive production the Department shall not decline to 30 24 record. facilities in the PRC. In the consider information deemed Based on record evidence, the Preliminary Results, we stated that ‘‘deficient’’ under section 782(d) if (1) Department determines that the PRC- because Hilltop had presented no the information is submitted by the wide entity, which includes Hilltop, has additional evidence to demonstrate that established deadline; (2) the information failed to cooperate to the best of its it is not a part of this single entity, we can be verified; (3) the information is ability in providing the requested continued to find that Hilltop and its not so incomplete that it cannot serve as information. Accordingly, pursuant to affiliates were part of a single entity in a reliable basis for reaching the 25 this review. While we note that applicable determination; (4) the 26 See e.g., Certain Lined Paper Products from the Hilltop is located in Hong Kong, its interested party has demonstrated that it People’s Republic of China: Notice of Final Results affiliated producers are located in the acted to the best of its ability in of the Second Administrative Review of the PRC. As we cannot rely on any of the Antidumping Order, 74 FR 63387 (December 3, providing the information and meeting 2009), affirmed in The Watanabe Group v. United information provided in Hilltop’s the requirements established by the States, 2010 Ct. Int. Trade LEXIS 144, Slip. Op. section A questionnaire responses, we Department; and (5) the information can 2010–139 (2010). be used without undue difficulties. 27 See Memorandum to the File through Catherine 23 See Preliminary Results at 12801, 12804. Bertrand, Program Manager, Office 9, from Kabir 24 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Hilltop/PRC-Wide Entity Archuletta, Analyst, Office 9, re: ‘‘Administrative Review of Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results As explained further in Comment 1 of and Preliminary Partial Rescission of Fifth the People’s Republic of China: Application of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR the I&D Memo, the Department finds Adverse Facts Available to Hilltop International,’’ 8338, 8339 (February 14, 2011), unchanged in that the information to calculate an dated concurrently with this notice (‘‘Hilltop AFA Administrative Review of Certain Frozen accurate and otherwise reliable margin Memo’’). 28 Warmwater Shrimp From the People’s Republic of is not available on the record with See also Statement of Administrative Action China: Final Results and Partial Rescission of accompanying the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 76 FR respect to Hilltop. Because the H.R. Rep. No., 103–316 at 870 (1994) (‘‘SAA’’). 51940 (August 19, 2011) (‘‘PRC Shrimp AR5’’). Department finds that necessary 29 See id. 25 See Preliminary Results at 12801, 12803. information is not on the record, and 30 See section 776(b) of the Act.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 53860 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices

sections 776(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), and (D), Federal Circuit (‘‘Federal Circuit’’) have available.39 The Department’s practice and section 776(b) of the Act, we find affirmed Commerce’s practice of is not to recalculate margins provided in it appropriate to apply a margin to the selecting the highest margin on the petitions, but rather to corroborate the PRC-wide entity based entirely on facts record for any segment of the applicable petition rate when applying available with an adverse inference.31 proceeding as the AFA rate.35 Therefore, that rate as AFA.40 The AFA rate in the By doing so, we ensure that the PRC- we are assigning as AFA to the PRC- current review (i.e., the PRC-wide rate of wide entity, which includes Hilltop, wide entity, which includes Hilltop, a 112.81 percent) represents the highest will not obtain a more favorable result rate of 112.81%, which is the highest rate from the petition in the LTFV by failing to cooperate than had it rate on the record of this proceeding and investigation and was corroborated in 41 cooperated fully in this review. See I&D which was the rate assigned to the PRC- the LTFV investigation. Memo at Comment 1 and Hilltop AFA wide entity in the less than fair value With respect to the relevance aspect of corroboration, the Department will Memo. investigation (‘‘LTFV’’) of this The Department’s practice is to select consider information reasonably at its proceeding.36 an AFA rate that is sufficiently adverse disposal to determine whether a margin as to effectuate the purpose of the facts Corroboration of PRC-Wide Entity Rate continues to have relevance. Where available rule to induce respondents to circumstances indicate that the selected provide the Department with complete Section 776(c) of the Act requires that margin is not appropriate as AFA, the and accurate information in a timely when relying on secondary information, Department will disregard the margin manner and that ensures that the party the Department must corroborate, to the and determine an appropriate margin. does not obtain a more favorable result extent practicable, the rate which it For example, in Fresh Cut Flowers from by failing to cooperate than if it had applies as AFA. To be considered Mexico,42 the Department disregarded cooperated fully.32 In choosing the corroborated, the Department must find the highest margin on the record as not appropriate balance between providing the information has probative value, being the best information available (the respondents with an incentive to meaning that the information must be predecessor to adverse facts available) respond accurately and imposing a rate found to be both reliable and relevant.37 because the margin was based on that is reasonably related to the As noted above, we are applying as AFA another company’s uncharacteristic respondent’s prior commercial activity, the highest rate from any segment of this business expense resulting in an selecting the highest prior margin proceeding, which is the rate currently unusually high margin. The information ‘‘reflects a common sense inference that applicable to all exporters subject to the used in calculating this margin was the highest prior margin is the most PRC-wide rate. Although Hilltop has based on sales and production data probative evidence of current margins, questioned the reliability of the PRC- submitted by the petitioner in the LTFV because, if it were not so, the importer, wide rate because it was based on investigation, together with the most knowing of the rule, would have normal values calculated using Indian appropriate surrogate value information produced current information showing surrogate values,38 the Department sees available to the Department chosen from 33 the margin to be less.’’ Specifically, no reason to deviate from its standard submissions by the parties in the LTFV 43 the Department’s practice in reviews, practice of using petition rates as the investigation. Furthermore, the when selecting a rate as total AFA, is to rates for applying adverse facts calculation of this margin was subject to use the highest rate on the record of the comment from interested parties during proceeding which, to the extent the investigation after it was selected as 35 34 See, e.g., KYD, Inc. v United States, 607 F.3d practicable, can be corroborated. The 760, 766–767 (CAFC 2010) (‘‘KYD’’); see also NSK the rate for the PRC-wide entity in the 44 CIT and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ltd. v. United States, 346 F. Supp. 2d 1312, 1335 preliminary results. This has been the (CIT 2004) (affirming a 73.55 percent total AFA rate, rate applicable to the PRC-wide entity 31 See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the highest available dumping margin calculated for since the investigation. As there is no the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary a different respondent in the investigation). information on the record of this review Results of the First Administrative Review, 72 FR 36 See Notice of Preliminary Determination of 10689, 10692 (March 9, 2007) (decision to apply Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Partial Affirmative that demonstrates that this rate is not total AFA to the NME-wide entity), unchanged in Preliminary Determination of Critical appropriate for use as AFA, we Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From the Circumstances and Postponement of Final determine that this rate continues to be Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of the Determination: Certain Frozen and Canned relevant. Further, the CIT has held that First Administrative Review and First New Shipper Warmwater Shrimp From the People’s Republic of Review, 72 FR 52052 (September 12, 2007). China, 69 FR 42654, 42662 (July 16, 2004) (‘‘PRC where a respondent is found to be part 32 See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at Shrimp Prelim LTFV’’), unchanged in Notice of of the country-wide entity based on Less than Fair Value: Static Random Access Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair adverse inferences, the Department need Memory Semiconductors From Taiwan, 63 FR 8909, Value: Certain Frozen and Canned Warmwater not corroborate the country-wide rate 8911 (February 23, 1998); see also Brake Rotors Shrimp From the People’s Republic of China, 69 FR From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results 70997, 71002 (December 8, 2004) (‘‘PRC Shrimp 39 and Partial Rescission of the Seventh Final LTFV’’). See, e.g., Certain Steel Grating From the Administrative Review; Final Results of the 37 See SAA at 870; Tapered Roller Bearings and People’s Republic of China: Final Determination of Eleventh New Shipper Review, 70 FR 69937, 69939 Parts Thereof, Finished and Unfinished From Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 75 FR 32366 (June 8, 2010) and accompanying Issues and Decision (November 18, 2005), and SAA at 870. Japan, and Tapered Roller Bearings Four Inches or Memorandum at Comment 2. 33 See Rhone Poulenc, Inc. v. United States, 899 Less in Outside Diameter and Components Thereof, 40 F.2d 1185, 1190 (Fed. Cir. 1990). From Japan; Preliminary Results of Antidumping See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From the People’s Republic of China: 34 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of Duty Administrative Reviews and Partial Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Termination of Administrative Reviews, 61 FR Value, 75 FR 41808 (July 19, 2010) and Administrative Review, 74 FR 15930, 15934 (April 57391, 57392 (November 6, 1996) unchanged in accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 8, 2009), unchanged in Glycine From the People’s Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Comment 1. Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Finished and Unfinished From Japan, and Tapered 41 Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 41121 (August Roller Bearings Four Inches or Less in Outside See PRC Shrimp Prelim LTFV, unchanged in 14, 2009); see also Fujian Lianfu Forestry Co., Ltd. Diameter and Components Thereof, From Japan; PRC Shrimp Final LTFV. v. United States, 638 F. Supp. 2d 1325, 1336 (CIT Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 42 See Fresh Cut Flowers from Mexico; Final August 10, 2009) (’’Commerce may, of course, begin Reviews and Termination in Part, 62 FR 11825 Results of Antidumping Administrative Review, 61 its total AFA selection process by defaulting to the (March 13, 1997). FR 6812, 6814 (February 22, 1996) (‘‘Fresh Cut highest rate in any segment of the proceeding, but 38 See Letter from Hilltop to the Secretary of Flowers From Mexico’’). that selection must then be corroborated, to the Commerce, ‘‘Hilltop-Specific Issues Rebuttal Brief 43 See PRC Shrimp Prelim LTFV at 42654, 42662. extent practicable.’’). for Hilltop International’’ (July 23, 2012) at 26. 44 See id.

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices 53861

with respect to information specific to periods of sales at or above normal Cash Deposit Requirements that respondent because there is ‘‘no value. Thus we find that the criteria for The following cash-deposit requirement that the country-wide revocation have not been satisfied, and requirements will be effective upon entity rate based on Adverse Facts we are not revoking the Order with publication of the final results of this Available relate specifically to the regard to Hilltop. administrative review for all shipments individual company.’’ 45 Final Results of Review of the subject merchandise entered, or Because the 112.81 percent rate is withdrawn from warehouse, for both reliable and relevant, we determine The weighted-average dumping consumption on or after the publication that it has probative value and is margins for the POR are as follows: date, as provided for by section corroborated to the extent practicable, in 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the accordance with section 776(c) of the exporters listed above, the cash deposit Act. Therefore, we have assigned this rate will be the rate established in the AFA rate to exports of the subject final results of this review (except, if the merchandise by the PRC-wide entity, Weighted- Exporter average rate is zero or de minimis, i.e., less than which includes Hilltop. margin 0.5 percent, no cash deposit will be Request for Revocation (percent) required for that company); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC In the Preliminary Results, we Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Ma- determined that ‘‘pursuant to section rine Resources Co., Ltd ...... 0.00 and non-PRC exporters not listed above 751(d) of the Act and 19 CFR PRC-Wide Entity 47 ...... 112.81 that have separate rates, the cash 351.222(b)(2) * * * the application of deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the the antidumping duty order with Assessment respect to Hilltop is no longer warranted most recent period; (3) for all PRC for the following reasons: (1) The Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the exporters of subject merchandise which company had a zero or de minimis Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), the have not been found to be entitled to a margin for a period of at least three Department will determine, and CBP separate rate, the cash deposit rate will consecutive years; (2) the company has shall assess, antidumping duties on all be the PRC-wide rate of 112.81 percent; agreed to immediate reinstatement of appropriate entries of subject and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of the order if the Department finds that it merchandise in accordance with the subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit has resumed making sales at less than final results of this review. For rate will be the rate applicable to the NV; and, (3) the continued application assessment purposes, we calculated PRC exporters that supplied that non- of the order is not otherwise necessary importer (or customer)-specific PRC exporter. These deposit to offset dumping.’’ 46 After thorough assessment rates for merchandise analysis of the record evidence requirements, when imposed, shall subject to this review. Where remain in effect until further notice. submitted after the Preliminary Results appropriate, we calculated an ad in this review, we find that Hilltop, valorem rate for each importer (or Disclosure even it were considered to be eligible for customer) by dividing the total dumping We will disclose the calculations a separate rate and received a calculated margins for reviewed sales to that party performed within five days of the date zero or de minimis margin in this by the total entered values associated of publication of this notice to parties in review, has failed to demonstrate that with those transactions. For duty- this proceeding in accordance with 19 the ‘‘continued application of the order assessment rates calculated on this CFR 351.224(b). is not otherwise necessary to offset basis, we will direct CBP to assess the Reimbursement of Duties dumping.’’ Rather, we find that the resulting ad valorem rate against the deficiencies on the record of this entered customs values for the subject This notice also serves as a final review, which also implicate prior merchandise. Where appropriate, we reminder to importers of their reviews, preclude the Department from calculated a per-unit rate for each responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) granting Hilltop’s revocation request, in to file a certificate regarding the part due to Hilltop’s material importer (or customer) by dividing the total dumping margins for reviewed reimbursement of antidumping duties misrepresentations in this review and prior to liquidation of the relevant its refusal to provide information sales to that party by the total sales quantity associated with those entries during this POR. Failure to regarding activities relevant to the comply with this requirement could proceeding. See I&D Memo at Comment transactions. For duty-assessment rates calculated on this basis, we will direct result in the Department’s presumption 2; see also Hilltop AFA Memo. that reimbursement of antidumping CBP to assess the resulting per-unit rate Furthermore, because Hilltop (even if it duties has occurred and the subsequent against the entered quantity of the were eligible for a separate rate) receives assessment of doubled antidumping subject merchandise. Where an importer an AFA rate in these final results, it duties. does not satisfy the threshold (or customer)-specific assessment rate is requirement for revocation that a de minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), Administrative Protective Orders company must have three consecutive the Department will instruct CBP to This notice also serves as a reminder assess that importer (or customer’s) to parties subject to administrative 45 See Watanabe Group v. United States, 2010 Ct. entries of subject merchandise without protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their Int. Trade LEXIS 144, Slip. Op. 2010–139 (2010); regard to antidumping duties, in responsibility concerning the return or quoting Peer Bearing Co.-Changshan v. United accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). States, 587 F. Supp. 2d 1319, 1327 (CIT 2008); destruction of proprietary information Mach. Imp. & Exp. Co. v. United States, The Department intends to issue disclosed under APO in accordance Slip Op. 09–64, 2009 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 76, 2009 assessment instructions to CBP 15 days with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues WL 2017042, at *8 (CIT June 24, 2009) (‘‘Commerce after the date of publication of these to govern business proprietary has no obligation to corroborate the PRC-wide rate final results of review. as to an individual party where that party has failed information in this segment of the to qualify for a separate rate’’). proceeding. Timely written notification 46 See Preliminary Results at 12803. 47 See Appendix II—PRC-Wide Entity Companies. of the return/destruction of APO

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES 53862 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 171 / Tuesday, September 4, 2012 / Notices

materials or conversion to judicial Ever Hope International Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang Go Harvest Aquatic Products Co., protective order is hereby requested. Everflow Ind. Supply Ltd. Failure to comply with the regulations Flags Wins Trading Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang Haizhou Aquatic Product Co. Ltd. and terms of an APO is a violation Fuchang Aquatic Products Freezing Zhanjiang Jinguo Marine Foods Co., Ltd. Fujian Chaohui International Trading Zhanjiang Longwei Aquatic Products which is subject to sanction. Industry Co., Ltd. We are issuing and publishing this Fuqing Minhua Trade Co., Ltd. Fuqing Yihua Aquatic Food Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang Universal Seafood Corp. administrative review and notice in Fuqing Yiyuan Trading Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Daishan Baofa Aquatic Products accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and Gallant Ocean (Nanhai), Ltd. Co., Ltd. 777(i) of the Act. Jiahuang Foods Zhejiang Industrial Group Co., Ltd. Dated: August 27, 2012. Guangdong Jinhang Foods Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Shaoxing Green Vegetable Instant Freezing Co., Ltd. Paul Piquado, Guangdong Wanya Foods Fty. Co., Ltd. Hai Li Aquatic Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Zhoufu Food Co., Ltd. Assistant Secretary for Import Hainan Brich Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. Zhongshan Foodstuffs & Aquatic Imp. & Exp. Administration. Hainan Golden Spring Foods Co., Ltd. Group Co. Ltd. of Guangdong Appendix I—Issues & Decision Hainan Hailisheng Food Co., Ltd. City Shengtai Aquatic Co. Zhoushan Junwei Aquatic Product Co. Memorandum Hainan Seaberry Seafoods Corporation Hainan Xiangtai Fishery Co., Ltd. Zhoushan Lianghong Aquatic Foods Co. Ltd. Comment 1: Whether the Department Should Haizhou Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. Zhoushan Mingyu Aquatic Product Co. Ltd. Apply Facts Available With an Adverse Hua Yang () International Zhoushan Putuo Huafa Sea Products Co., Ltd. Inference to Hilltop Jet Power International Ltd. [FR Doc. 2012–21734 Filed 8–31–12; 8:45 am] Comment 2: Whether Hilltop’s Revocation Jin Cheng Food Co., Ltd. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Request Should Be Denied Leizhou Yunyuan Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. Comment 3: Whether the Record Suggests a Maple Leaf Foods International Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 North Seafood Group Co. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Comment 4: Whether the Department Should Panasonic Mfg. Xiamen CoPhoenix Intl. Initiate Changed Circumstances Reviews Rizhao Smart Foods International Trade Administration Comment 5: Whether the Department Should Rui’an Huasheng Aquatic Products Reject Petitioner’s Untimely Submission of Processing Factory Factual Evidence Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Savvy Seafood Inc. Order, Finding, or Suspended Comment 6: Whether the Department Should Sea Trade International Inc. Formally Cancel Verification of Hilltop Shanghai Linghai Fisheries Trading Co. Ltd. Investigation; Advance Notification of Comment 7: Whether To Apply AFA to Regal Shanghai Smiling Food Co., Ltd. Sunset Reviews Comment 8: Respondent Selection Shanghai Zhoulian Foods Co., Ltd. Methodology AGENCY: Import Administration, Shantou Jiazhou Foods Industry Comment 9: Shrimp Larvae Shantou Jin Cheng Food Co., Ltd. International Trade Administration, Comment 10: Shrimp Feed Shantou Longfeng Foodstuff Co., Ltd. Department of Commerce. Comment 11: Labor Surrogate Value Shantou Longsheng Aquatic Product Comment 12: Surrogate Financial Statement Background Foodstuff Co., Ltd. Selection Shantou Ruiyuan Industry Company Ltd. Every five years, pursuant to section Comment 13: Surrogate Financial Ratio Shantou Wanya Foods Fty. Co., Ltd. Adjustment 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as Shantou Xinwanya Aquatic Product Ltd. Comment 14: Surrogate Value Calculation for amended (‘‘the Act’’), the Department of Company Ice Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) and the Shantou Yue Xiang Commercial Trading Co., International Trade Commission Appendix II—PRC-Wide Entity Ltd. automatically initiate and conduct a Companies Shengsi Huali Aquatic Co., Ltd. SLK Hardware review to determine whether revocation The PRC-wide entity includes Hilltop and Thai Royal Frozen Food Zhanjiang Co., Ltd. of a countervailing or antidumping duty the 81 companies currently under review that Tongwei Hainan Aquatic Products Co. Ltd. order or termination of an investigation have not established their entitlement to a Top One Intl. suspended under section 704 or 734 of separate rate. Those 81 companies are: Xiamen Granda Import & Export Co., Ltd. the Act would be likely to lead to Allied Pacific Aquatic Products Zhanjiang Co Xinjiang Top Agricultural Products Co., Ltd. continuation or recurrence of dumping Ltd. Xinxing Aquatic Products Processing Factory or a countervailable subsidy (as the case Allied Pacific Food (Dalian) Co., Ltd. Yancheng Hi-king Agriculture Developing may be) and of material injury. Asian Seafoods (Zhanjiang) Co., Ltd. Co., Ltd. Beihai Evergreen Aquatic Product Science Yangjiang Wanshida Seafood Co., Ltd. Upcoming Sunset Reviews for October And Technology Co Ltd. Yelin Enterprise Co., Ltd. 2012 Beihai Qinguo Frozen Foods Co., Ltd. Zhangzhou Xinwanya Aquatic Product Capital Prospect Zhanjiang East Sea Kelon Aquatic Products The following Sunset Reviews are Dalian Hualian Foods Co., Ltd. Co. Ltd scheduled for initiation in October 2012 Dalian Shanhai Seafood Co., Ltd. Zhanjiang Fuchang Aquatic Products Co., and will appear in that month’s Notice Dalian Z&H Seafood Co., Ltd. Ltd. of Initiation of Five-Year Sunset Review.

Department contact

Antidumping Duty Proceedings Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from China (A–570–868) (2nd Review) ...... Jennifer Moats (202) 482–5047 Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe from Japan (A–588–857) (2nd Review) ...... Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391 Silicomanganese from India (A–533–823) (2nd Review) ...... Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391 Silicomanganese from (A–834–807) (2nd Review) ...... Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391 Silicomanganese from Venezuela (A–307–820) (2nd Review) ...... Dana Mermelstein (202) 482–1391

VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:25 Aug 31, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\04SEN1.SGM 04SEN1 tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES