DMC1 Protein-Protein Interactions Are Directly Linked to Meiosis Homeostasis and Fertility
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Computational Genome-Wide Identification of Heat Shock Protein Genes in the Bovine Genome [Version 1; Peer Review: 2 Approved, 1 Approved with Reservations]
F1000Research 2018, 7:1504 Last updated: 08 AUG 2021 RESEARCH ARTICLE Computational genome-wide identification of heat shock protein genes in the bovine genome [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Oyeyemi O. Ajayi1,2, Sunday O. Peters3, Marcos De Donato2,4, Sunday O. Sowande5, Fidalis D.N. Mujibi6, Olanrewaju B. Morenikeji2,7, Bolaji N. Thomas 8, Matthew A. Adeleke 9, Ikhide G. Imumorin2,10,11 1Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria 2International Programs, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA 3Department of Animal Science, Berry College, Mount Berry, GA, 30149, USA 4Departamento Regional de Bioingenierias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Ingenieria y Ciencias, Queretaro, Mexico 5Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria 6Usomi Limited, Nairobi, Kenya 7Department of Animal Production and Health, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria 8Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, 14623, USA 9School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, 4000, South Africa 10School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30032, USA 11African Institute of Bioscience Research and Training, Ibadan, Nigeria v1 First published: 20 Sep 2018, 7:1504 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16058.1 Latest published: 20 Sep 2018, 7:1504 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16058.1 Reviewer Status Invited Reviewers Abstract Background: Heat shock proteins (HSPs) are molecular chaperones 1 2 3 known to bind and sequester client proteins under stress. Methods: To identify and better understand some of these proteins, version 1 we carried out a computational genome-wide survey of the bovine 20 Sep 2018 report report report genome. -
Stress-Responsive Regulation of Mitochondria Through the ER
TEM-969; No. of Pages 10 Review Stress-responsive regulation of mitochondria through the ER unfolded protein response T. Kelly Rainbolt, Jaclyn M. Saunders, and R. Luke Wiseman Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, Department of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria form function is sensitive to pathologic insults that induce ER physical interactions involved in the regulation of bio- stress (defined by the increased accumulation of misfolded logic functions including mitochondrial bioenergetics proteins within the ER lumen). ER stress can be transmit- and apoptotic signaling. To coordinate these functions ted to mitochondria by alterations in the transfer of me- 2+ during stress, cells must coregulate ER and mitochon- tabolites such as Ca or by stress-responsive signaling dria through stress-responsive signaling pathways such pathways, directly influencing mitochondrial functions. as the ER unfolded protein response (UPR). Although the Depending on the extent of cellular stress, the stress UPR is traditionally viewed as a signaling pathway re- signaling from the ER to mitochondria can result in pro- sponsible for regulating ER proteostasis, it is becoming survival or proapoptotic adaptations in mitochondrial increasingly clear that the protein kinase RNA (PKR)-like function. endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) signaling pathway During the early adaptive phase of ER stress, ER– 2+ within the UPR can also regulate mitochondria proteos- mitochondrial contacts increase, promoting Ca transfer 2+ tasis and function in response to pathologic insults that between these organelles [4]. This increase in Ca flux into induce ER stress. Here, we discuss the contributions of mitochondria stimulates mitochondrial metabolism 2+ PERK in coordinating ER–mitochondrial activities and through the activity of Ca -regulated dehydrogenases describe the mechanisms by which PERK adapts mito- involved in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. -
The Prognosis Analysis of RFWD2 Inhibiting the Expression of ETV1 in Colorectal Cancer
521 Original Article The prognosis analysis of RFWD2 inhibiting the expression of ETV1 in colorectal cancer Wei Huang1#, Xiumei Tian2,3#, Xiaoying Guan2,3 1Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Shunde Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Foshan 528315, China; 2Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510500, China; 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basic Medicine School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China Contributions: (I) Conception and design: W Huang, X Guan; (II) Administrative support: Guangzhou Medical University; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: W Huang; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: X Tian; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: W Huang, X Guan; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. #These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Xiaoying Guan. Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Affiliated Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Huangsha Avenue 39#, Liwan District, Guangzhou 510500, China; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Basic Medicine School, Guangzhou Medical University, Xinzao, Panyu District, Guangzhou 511436, China. Email: [email protected]. Background: The poor prognosis is partly due to the lack of efficient methods for early diagnosis on colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Bioinformatic analysis and Immunohistochemical analysis were used to evaluate E3 ubiquitin ligase Ring finger and WD domain 2 RFWD2( ) and ETS variant 1 (ETV1) mRNA and protein expression levels. Results: The abundance of RFWD2 and ETV1 proteins from 76 CRC patients were examined. The relationship between their expression levels and clinic pathological parameters including prognostic significances were also detected. -
(TEX) Genes: a Review Focused on Spermatogenesis and Male Fertility
Bellil et al. Basic and Clinical Andrology (2021) 31:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-021-00127-7 REVIEW ARTICLE Open Access Human testis-expressed (TEX) genes: a review focused on spermatogenesis and male fertility Hela Bellil1, Farah Ghieh2,3, Emeline Hermel2,3, Béatrice Mandon-Pepin2,3 and François Vialard1,2,3* Abstract Spermatogenesis is a complex process regulated by a multitude of genes. The identification and characterization of male-germ-cell-specific genes is crucial to understanding the mechanisms through which the cells develop. The term “TEX gene” was coined by Wang et al. (Nat Genet. 2001; 27: 422–6) after they used cDNA suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) to identify new transcripts that were present only in purified mouse spermatogonia. TEX (Testis expressed) orthologues have been found in other vertebrates (mammals, birds, and reptiles), invertebrates, and yeasts. To date, 69 TEX genes have been described in different species and different tissues. To evaluate the expression of each TEX/tex gene, we compiled data from 7 different RNA-Seq mRNA databases in humans, and 4 in the mouse according to the expression atlas database. Various studies have highlighted a role for many of these genes in spermatogenesis. Here, we review current knowledge on the TEX genes and their roles in spermatogenesis and fertilization in humans and, comparatively, in other species (notably the mouse). As expected, TEX genes appear to have a major role in reproduction in general and in spermatogenesis in humans but also in all mammals such as the mouse. Most of them are expressed specifically or predominantly in the testis. -
Transcription Factor ZFP38 Is Essential for Meiosis Prophase I in Male Mice
REPRODUCTIONRESEARCH Transcription factor ZFP38 is essential for meiosis prophase I in male mice Zechen Yan1, Dandan Fan2, Qingjun Meng1, Jinjian Yang1, Wei Zhao1, Fei Guo1, Dongjian Song1, Ruiming Guo1, Ke Sun1 and Jiaxiang Wang1 1Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China and 2Henan Academy of Medical and Pharmaceutical Science, Zhengzhou, Henan, China Correspondence should be addressed to J Wang; Email: [email protected] Abstract The production of haploid gametes by meiosis is a cornerstone of sexual reproduction and maintenance of genome integrity. Zfp38 mRNA is expressed in spermatocytes, indicating that transcription factor ZFP38 has the potential to regulate transcription during meiosis. In this study, we generated Zfp38 conditional knockout mice (Zfp38flox/flox, Stra8-Cre, hereafter called Zfp38 cKO) and found that spermatogenesis did not progress beyond meiosis prophase I in Zfp38 cKO mice. Using a chromosomal spread technique, we observed that Zfp38 cKO spermatocytes exhibited a failure in chromosomal synapsis observed by SYCP1/SYCP3 double staining. Progression of DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) repair is disrupted in Zfp38 cKO spermatocytes, as revealed by γ-H2AX, RAD51 and MLH1 staining. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein levels of DSB repair enzymes and factors that guide their loading onto sites of DSBs, such as RAD51, DMC1, RAD51, TEX15 and PALB2, were significantly reduced in Zfp38 cKO spermatocytes. Taken together, our data suggest that ZFP38 is critical for the chromosomal synapsis and DSB repairs partially via its regulation of DSB repair- associated protein expression during meiotic progression in mouse. Reproduction (2016) 152 431–437 Introduction recombinases (Pittman et al. -
Evaluation of the Role of Human Dnajas in the Response to Cytotoxic Chemotherapeutic Agents in a Yeast Model System
Hindawi BioMed Research International Volume 2020, Article ID 9097638, 14 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9097638 Research Article Evaluation of the Role of Human DNAJAs in the Response to Cytotoxic Chemotherapeutic Agents in a Yeast Model System AurelliaWhitmore,DevonFreeny,SamanthaJ.Sojourner,JanaS.Miles,WillieM.Graham, and Hernan Flores-Rozas College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Hernan Flores-Rozas; hernan.fl[email protected] Received 25 September 2019; Revised 3 January 2020; Accepted 9 January 2020; Published 14 February 2020 Guest Editor: Chengsheng Wu Copyright © 2020 Aurellia Whitmore et al. -is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) play a crucial role in maintaining protein stability for cell survival during stress-induced insults. Overexpression of HSPs in cancer cells results in antiapoptotic activity contributing to cancer cell survival and restricting the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy, which continues to play an important role in the treatment of many cancers, including triple- negative breast cancer (TNBC). First-line therapy for TNBC includes anthracycline antibiotics, which are associated with serious dose-dependent side effects and the development of resistance. We previously identified YDJ1, which encodes a heat-shock protein 40 (HSP40), as an important factor in the cellular response to anthracyclines in yeast, with mutants displaying over 100- fold increased sensitivity to doxorubicin. In humans, the DNAJA HSP40s are homologues of YDJ1. To determine the role of DNAJAs in the cellular response to cytotoxic drugs, we investigated their ability to rescue ydj1Δ mutants from exposure to chemotherapeutic agents. -
Loss of Tid1/DNAJA3 Co-Chaperone Promotes Progression And
cancers Article Loss of Tid1/DNAJA3 Co-Chaperone Promotes Progression and Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Surgical Resection: A Novel Model to Stratify Risk of Recurrence Kuan-Yang Chen 1,2,3, Yi-Hsiang Huang 1,4,* , Wan-Huai Teo 5, Ching-Wen Chang 5,6, Yu-Syuan Chen 5, Yi-Chen Yeh 7, Chieh-Ju Lee 4 and Jeng-Fan Lo 5,8,9,* 1 Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Institute of Neuroscience, National Chengchi University, Taipei 11605, Taiwan 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei 10629, Taiwan 4 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; [email protected] 5 Institute of Oral Biology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan; [email protected] (W.-H.T.); fl[email protected] (C.-W.C.); [email protected] (Y.-S.C.) 6 Laboratory of Human Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA 7 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan; [email protected] 8 Department of Dentistry, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan 9 Cancer Progression Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.-H.H.); jfl[email protected] (J.-F.L.); Tel.: +886-2-28712121 (ext. 7506) (Y.-H.H.); Fax: +886-2-28739318 (Y.-H.H.) Simple Summary: Tid1 acts as a tumor suppressor in various cancer types, however, its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. -
Meiotic Gene Expression Initiates During Larval Development in the Sea Urchin $Watermark-Text $Watermark-Text $Watermark-Text Mamiko Yajima1, Elena Suglia, Eric A
NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Dev Dyn. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2014 February 01. Published in final edited form as: Dev Dyn. 2013 February ; 242(2): 155–163. doi:10.1002/dvdy.23904. Meiotic gene expression initiates during larval development in the sea urchin $watermark-text $watermark-text $watermark-text Mamiko Yajima1, Elena Suglia, Eric A. Gustafson, and Gary M. Wessel2 MCB Department, Brown University, 185 Meeting Street, BOX-GL173, Providence, RI 02912, USA Abstract Background—Meiosis is a unique mechanism in gamete production and a fundamental process shared by all sexually reproducing eukaryotes. Meiosis requires several specialized and highly conserved genes whose expression can also identify the germ cells undergoing gametogenic differentiation. Sea urchins are echinoderms which form a phylogenetic sister group of chordates. Sea urchin embryos undergo a feeding, planktonic larval phase in which they construct an adult rudiment prior to metamorphosis. Although a series of conserved meiosis genes (e.g. dmc1, msh5, rad21, rad51, and sycp1) are expressed in sea urchin oocytes, we sought to determine when in development meiosis would first be initiated. Result—We surveyed the expression of several meiotic genes and their corresponding proteins in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Surprisingly, meiotic genes are highly expressed not only in ovaries but beginning in larvae. Both RNA and protein localizations strongly suggest that meiotic gene expression initiates in tissues that will eventually give rise to the adult rudiment of the late larva. Conclusions—These results demonstrate that broad expression of the molecules associated with meiotic differentiation initiates prior to metamorphosis and may have additional functions in these cells, or mechanisms repressing their function until later in development, when gametogenesis begins. -
Crystal Structure of Hop2-Mnd1 and Mechanistic Insights Into Its Role in Meiotic Recombination
This is a repository copy of Crystal structure of Hop2-Mnd1 and mechanistic insights into its role in meiotic recombination. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/152403/ Version: Published Version Article: Kang, H.-A., Shin, H.-C., Kalantzi, A.-S. et al. (5 more authors) (2015) Crystal structure of Hop2-Mnd1 and mechanistic insights into its role in meiotic recombination. Nucleic Acids Research, 43 (7). pp. 3841-3856. ISSN 0305-1048 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv172 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Published online 3 March 2015 Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, Vol. 43, No. 7 3841–3856 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv172 NAR Breakthrough Article Crystal structure of Hop2–Mnd1 and mechanistic insights into its role in meiotic recombination Hyun-Ah Kang1, Ho-Chul Shin1,2, Alexandra-Styliani Kalantzi3, Christopher P. Toseland4, Hyun-Min Kim1, Stephan Gruber4, Matteo Dal Peraro3 and Byung-Ha Oh1,* 1Department of Biological Sciences, -
The HSP70 Chaperone Machinery: J Proteins As Drivers of Functional Specificity
REVIEWS The HSP70 chaperone machinery: J proteins as drivers of functional specificity Harm H. Kampinga* and Elizabeth A. Craig‡ Abstract | Heat shock 70 kDa proteins (HSP70s) are ubiquitous molecular chaperones that function in a myriad of biological processes, modulating polypeptide folding, degradation and translocation across membranes, and protein–protein interactions. This multitude of roles is not easily reconciled with the universality of the activity of HSP70s in ATP-dependent client protein-binding and release cycles. Much of the functional diversity of the HSP70s is driven by a diverse class of cofactors: J proteins. Often, multiple J proteins function with a single HSP70. Some target HSP70 activity to clients at precise locations in cells and others bind client proteins directly, thereby delivering specific clients to HSP70 and directly determining their fate. In their native cellular environment, polypeptides are participates in such diverse cellular functions. Their constantly at risk of attaining conformations that pre- functional diversity is remarkable considering that vent them from functioning properly and/or cause them within and across species, HSP70s have high sequence to aggregate into large, potentially cytotoxic complexes. identity. They share a single biochemical activity: an Molecular chaperones guide the conformation of proteins ATP-dependent client-binding and release cycle com- throughout their lifetime, preventing their aggregation bined with client protein recognition, which is typi- by protecting interactive surfaces against non-productive cally rather promiscuous. This apparent conundrum interactions. Through such inter actions, molecular chap- is resolved by the fact that HSP70s do not work alone, erones aid in the folding of nascent proteins as they are but rather as ‘HSP70 machines’, collaborating with synthesized by ribosomes, drive protein transport across and being regulated by several cofactors. -
Single Cell Derived Clonal Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Links
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Single cell derived clonal analysis of human glioblastoma links functional and genomic heterogeneity ! Mona Meyer*, Jüri Reimand*, Xiaoyang Lan, Renee Head, Xueming Zhu, Michelle Kushida, Jane Bayani, Jessica C. Pressey, Anath Lionel, Ian D. Clarke, Michael Cusimano, Jeremy Squire, Stephen Scherer, Mark Bernstein, Melanie A. Woodin, Gary D. Bader**, and Peter B. Dirks**! ! * These authors contributed equally to this work.! ** Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]! ! Supplementary information - Meyer, Reimand et al. Supplementary methods" 4" Patient samples and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)! 4! Differentiation! 4! Immunocytochemistry and EdU Imaging! 4! Proliferation! 5! Western blotting ! 5! Temozolomide treatment! 5! NCI drug library screen! 6! Orthotopic injections! 6! Immunohistochemistry on tumor sections! 6! Promoter methylation of MGMT! 6! Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH)! 7! SNP6 microarray analysis and genome segmentation! 7! Calling copy number alterations! 8! Mapping altered genome segments to genes! 8! Recurrently altered genes with clonal variability! 9! Global analyses of copy number alterations! 9! Phylogenetic analysis of copy number alterations! 10! Microarray analysis! 10! Gene expression differences of TMZ resistant and sensitive clones of GBM-482! 10! Reverse transcription-PCR analyses! 11! Tumor subtype analysis of TMZ-sensitive and resistant clones! 11! Pathway analysis of gene expression in the TMZ-sensitive clone of GBM-482! 11! Supplementary figures and tables" 13" "2 Supplementary information - Meyer, Reimand et al. Table S1: Individual clones from all patient tumors are tumorigenic. ! 14! Fig. S1: clonal tumorigenicity.! 15! Fig. S2: clonal heterogeneity of EGFR and PTEN expression.! 20! Fig. S3: clonal heterogeneity of proliferation.! 21! Fig. -
A Systems-Genetics Analyses of Complex Phenotypes
A systems-genetics analyses of complex phenotypes A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Life Sciences 2015 David Ashbrook Table of contents Table of contents Table of contents ............................................................................................... 1 Tables and figures ........................................................................................... 10 General abstract ............................................................................................... 14 Declaration ....................................................................................................... 15 Copyright statement ........................................................................................ 15 Acknowledgements.......................................................................................... 16 Chapter 1: General introduction ...................................................................... 17 1.1 Overview................................................................................................... 18 1.2 Linkage, association and gene annotations .............................................. 20 1.3 ‘Big data’ and ‘omics’ ................................................................................ 22 1.4 Systems-genetics ..................................................................................... 24 1.5 Recombinant inbred (RI) lines and the BXD .............................................. 25 Figure 1.1: