DOCSLIB.ORG

A P P R a I S a L R E P O R T FAIR MARKET VALUE of EXISTING STADIUM SITE 135.12 Acres of Land Primarily Being Used As SDCCU St

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A P P R a I S a L R E P O R T FAIR MARKET VALUE of EXISTING STADIUM SITE 135.12 Acres of Land Primarily Being Used As SDCCU St D.F. DAVIS REAL ESTATE INC. A P P R A I S A L R E P O R T FAIR MARKET VALUE OF EXISTING STADIUM SITE 135.12 acres of land primarily being used as SDCCU Stadium located on the south side of Friars Road at Mission Village Drive (9449 Friars Road) San Diego, CA 92108 APPRAISED FOR The Board of Trustees of the California State University c/o San Diego State University Business & Financial Affairs 5500 Campanile Drive San Diego, CA 92182-1620 City of San Diego Real Estate Assets Department 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1700, MS 51A San Diego, CA 92101-4199 AP 631304 DATE OF VALUATION September 30, 2017 (retrospective) DATE OF REPORT September 30, 2019 APPRAISED BY D.F. Davis Real Estate, Inc. David F. Davis, MAI 860 Jamacha Road, Suite 206 El Cajon, CA 92019 File No. 19-14 D.F. DAVIS REAL ESTATE 860 Jamacha Road, Suite 206, El Cajon, CA 92019 • Tel. (858) 485-5000 • (619) 401-9000 INC. September 30, 2019 The Board of Trustees of the California State University c/o Mr. Tom McCarron Senior Vice President, SDSU Mission Valley Development San Diego State University Business & Financial Affairs 5500 Campanile Drive San Diego, CA 92182-1620 Ms. Jean V.G. Catling, MAI Principal Appraiser/Program Manager/Valuation City of San Diego – Real Estate Assets Department 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1700, MS 51A San Diego, CA 92101-4199 Re: Fair Market Value of Existing Stadium Site 135.12 acres of land primarily being used as SDCCU Stadium 9449 Friars Road San Diego, CA 92108 Dear Mr. McCarron and Ms. Catling: At your request and authorization, the above-referenced property and its environs were inspected for the purpose of formulating an opinion of the fair market value of the subject property as of the retrospective effective date of valuation of September 30, 2017. The subject property was valued as if the existing stadium is no longer operational and no stadium expenses were deducted from the appraised value. The subject property was appraised in fee simple interest, at the highest and best use and disregarding any leases. These requirements represent hypothetical conditions and extraordinary assumptions. Highest and best use is defined as: "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, which is physically possible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value." The intent of this appraisal is that it reflects the residual value of a hypothetical third-party market- rate project and not the SDSU Mission Valley project. Of the three traditional valuation approaches, Cost, Sales Comparison and Income Capitalization, the valuation utilizes the Income Approach via Discounted Cash Flow Analysis which, in this case, reflects the value of the subject property in its present condition by hypothetically forecasting its development in to finished lots for sale to third- parties and deducting the commensurate costs. 19-14 ii David F. Davis MAI D.F. DAVIS REAL ESTATE INC. EXISTING STADIUM SITE Discounted Cash Flow Analysis begins with a projection of revenue over the analysis period. Expense items must then be deducted to arrive at net cash flows which are discounted for entrepreneurial incentive to arrive at a present value indication which is the market value estimate. The Sales Comparison Approach was used to estimate the value of the different components that comprise the projected revenue in the Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. The Sales Comparison Approach to value involves the comparison of the subject property with recent sales of comparable properties and then isolating pertinent units of comparison which can be applied to the subject. The sale price per acre, lot/unit or per square foot are typically the units of comparison utilized. The Cost Approach is based on the proposition that the informed purchaser would pay no more than the cost of producing a substitute property with the same utility as the subject property. The Cost Approach was not completed as the residual land value exceeds the value as improved. The following report, of which this letter is a part, describes the facts and reasoning upon which the opinions are supported. The valuations were based on market data and economic trends present before the retrospective effective date of value and projected as of the date of value, and is subject to the attached Assumptions and Limiting Conditions. At the request of the clients, the definition of fair market value used for this appraisal is: Appraiser’s opinion of the Fair Market Value of the Existing Stadium Site shall be based on the Municipal Code and these Instructions and shall reflect the most probable price which the Existing Stadium Site should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and the seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Appraiser shall assume the conveyance of title in the Existing Stadium Site from the seller to the buyer under conditions whereby: (a) the seller and the buyer are typically motivated; (b) both the seller and the buyer are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests; (c) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (d) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or comparable financial arrangements; and (e) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. This appraisal values the fee simple interest in the 135.12 acres but includes the cost of constructing a 34.6 acre River Park adjacent to the south. A requirement for development of the 135.12 acres at highest and best use is the construction of a regional River Park on the 34.6 acres. The River Park land is contemplated for long term lease by the developer from the City of San Diego. Based upon investigation and analysis, the estimated fair market value of the fee simple interest of the subject property, as of September 30, 2017, subject to the attached assumptions and limiting conditions, was: $68,200,000 The value reflects the cost of major items, entitlement expenses, including demolition of the existing stadium, grading and flood plain remediation, on and off-site work, developing the river park, an allowance for deep foundation costs, and other development expenses. (These major items are shown on Page 2 and further discussed in the Income Approach – Discounted Cash Flow Analysis section.) 19-14 iii David F. Davis MAI D.F. DAVIS REAL ESTATE INC. EXISTING STADIUM SITE Very truly yours, David F. Davis, MAI President #AG002752 DFD/sts 19-14 iv David F. Davis MAI D.F. DAVIS REAL ESTATE EXISTING STADIUM SITE INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL……………………………………………………………………………………………….ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................... iv ADDENDUM ..................................................................................................................................... vii EXISTING STADIUM SITE ............................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF SALIENT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS .............................................................. 2 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS ............................................................................ 3 DISCLOSURE OF COMPETENCY .................................................................................................... 5 DESCRIPTIVE SECTION ................................................................................................................. 11 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 11 Stadium History .................................................................................................................... 14 TYPE AND DEFINITION OF VALUE ..................................................................................... 17 PROPERTY RIGHTS APPRAISED ........................................................................................... 18 DATE OF VALUATION ............................................................................................................ 18 INTENDED USE/INTENDED USER OF THE APPRAISAL .................................................. 18 SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................................................................... 18 PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................ 18 Legal Description ................................................................................................................. 18 Location ................................................................................................................................ 19 Owner of Record - History ................................................................................................... 19 AREA MAP ................................................................................................................................. 20 AREA DESCRIPTION – AS OF 2017 ....................................................................................... 21 NEIGHBORHOOD MAP ........................................................................................................... 22 Mission Valley Community Plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mission Valley Stadium Private Financing Proposal
    MISSION VALLEY STADIUM PART I PRIVATE FINANCING PROPOSAL SUMMARY OUTLINE PROPOSAL Benefits & Issues of Mission Valley – Conceptual Stadium Ideas Stadium Design Concepts & Features Proposed by: Infrastructure & Environmental Projected Infrastructure & Stadium Costs San Diego Stadium Cooperative Coalition Paying for a New Stadium – Private Financing Sources Naming Rights & Seat Licenses / PSL Issues & Objections Stadium-Development-Transportation Strategy & Financing Plan February 2015 Public Investment & Private Stadium Financing Proposed Private Stadium Financing Plan COPYRIGHT NOTICE © 2015 All Rights Reserved. Any use of these proprietary materials and concepts contained herein, including reproduction, modification, distribution or republication, PART II without the prior written consent, is strictly prohibited. MISSION VALLEY STADIUM REDEVELOPMENT PLAN DISCLAIMER This is a proprietary and confidential Proposal (“Proposal”) intended solely for Stadium Site Overview preliminary use and benefit in determining whether you desire to express further interest in the involvement and support of the Mission Valley Stadium Private Proposed Traffic Infrastructure Financing Project (“Project”). This Proposal contains selected information pertaining Mass Transit to the Project and does not purport to be a representation of the state of affairs of the Project or to be all-inclusive or to contain all or part of the information which Parking prospective parties and investors may require to evaluate involvement and support Pedestrian Access & Environmental of the Project. Conceptual Site Plan - Proposed Stadium All financial projections and information are provided for general reference purposes Proposed Commercial Village Development only and are based on assumptions relating to the general economy, market conditions, competition and other factors beyond the control of the proposal. Ground Lease Development Plan Therefore, all projections, assumptions and other information provided and made Site & Development Summary herein are subject to material variation.
    [Show full text]
  • Piper Rudnick Gray Cary LLP
    aJ./ ERNST & YOUNG PIPER RUDNICK Qua/it In E er thing We Do GRAY CARY ' AGENDA 11:00 a.m. Registration and networking 11:40 a.m. Ballroom opens; luncheon seating begins Lunch is erved 12:30 p.m. Luncheon program begins Welcome Duane Roth, CEO CONNECT Jay Rains, Partner DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary LLP Frieder Seible, Dean Jacobs School of Engineering, UCSD Introduction of Honoree Dr. Richard Atkinson, President Emeritus University of California Conversation with Walter J. Zable Fred Lewis, Producer and Host of lTV's "The Heart of San Diego" 2:00p.m. Program closes HALL OF FAME COMMITTEE Special thanks to the following Hall of Fame Committee Members: Committee Chair Brent Jacobs Burnham Real Estate Committee Members Knox Bell DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary US LLP Malin Burnham The Burnham Companies Edward Dennis UCSD Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry Sandy Ehrlich SDSU Entrepreneurial Management Center Stan Fleming Forward Ventures Dr. Jeffrey Kirsch Reuben H. Fleet Science Center Cub Parker Retired Technology Banker SPONSORS Lead Sponsor DLA Piper Rudnick ray Cary US LLP is a business law fi rm with offices PIPER RUDNICK throughout the U , whose core practices ar c rp rate and securities, litiga- liillllliiiital GRAY CARY tion, real estate, intellectual property, and government affairs.Worldwide, D LA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary has over 3,000 lawyers in 58 cities in 22 countries, including the United Kingdom, mainland Europe and Asia, offering leading practices in commercial, corporate and finance, human resour e , litigation, real estate, regulatory and legi lative, and techn 1 gy, edia, and com­ n1unicati ns.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the American Outdoor Sport Facility: Developing an Ideal Type on the Evolution of Professional Baseball and Football Structures
    AN ANALYSIS OF THE AMERICAN OUTDOOR SPORT FACILITY: DEVELOPING AN IDEAL TYPE ON THE EVOLUTION OF PROFESSIONAL BASEBALL AND FOOTBALL STRUCTURES DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Chad S. Seifried, B.S., M.Ed. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2005 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Donna Pastore, Advisor Professor Melvin Adelman _________________________________ Professor Janet Fink Advisor College of Education Copyright by Chad Seifried 2005 ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to analyze the physical layout of the American baseball and football professional sport facility from 1850 to present and design an ideal-type appropriate for its evolution. Specifically, this study attempts to establish a logical expansion and adaptation of Bale’s Four-Stage Ideal-type on the Evolution of the Modern English Soccer Stadium appropriate for the history of professional baseball and football and that predicts future changes in American sport facilities. In essence, it is the author’s intention to provide a more coherent and comprehensive account of the evolving professional baseball and football sport facility and where it appears to be headed. This investigation concludes eight stages exist concerning the evolution of the professional baseball and football sport facility. Stages one through four primarily appeared before the beginning of the 20th century and existed as temporary structures which were small and cheaply built. Stages five and six materialize as the first permanent professional baseball and football facilities. Stage seven surfaces as a multi-purpose facility which attempted to accommodate both professional football and baseball equally.
    [Show full text]
  • 1967 American Football League
    1967 AMERICAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE Research by Elias Sports Bureau and Pro OAKLAND 51, DENVER 0 Sunday, September 10 Football Research Association Linescore At Oakland Coliseum, attendance 25,423. Committee, Ken Pullis, Chairman Denver 0 0 0 0 - 0 Oakland 7 13 14 17 - 51 1967 AMERICAN FOOTBALL LEAGUE Oak-Dixon 3 run (Blanda kick) Oak-Lamonica 4 run (kick failed) Eastern Division W L T Pct. PF PA Oak-Dixon 10 pass from Lamonica (Blanda kick) Houston Oilers 9 4 1 .692 258 199 Oak-Daniels 6 run (Blanda kick) New York Jets 8 5 1 .615 371 329 Oak-Sherman 13 run (Blanda kick) Buffalo Bills 4 10 0 .286 237 285 Oak-FG Blanda 23 Miami Dolphins 4 10 0 .286 219 407 Oak-Wells 50 pass from Blanda (Blanda kick) Boston Patriots 3 10 1 .231 280 389 Oak-Powers 36 interception (Blanda kick) Western Division W L T Pct. PF PA BUFFALO 20, NEW YORK 17 Sunday, September 10 Oakland Raiders 13 1 0 .929 468 233 At War Memorial Stadium, attendance 45,748. Kansas City Chiefs 9 5 0 .643 408 254 New York 0 14 3 0 - 17 San Diego Chargers 8 5 1 .615 360 352 Buffalo 0 0 0 20 - 20 Denver Broncos 3 11 0 .214 256 409 NY-Maynard 19 pass from Namath (J. Turner kick) AFL Championship: Oakland 40, Houston 7 NY-Maynard 56 pass from Namath (J. Turner kick) NY-FG Turner 32 Buff-Powell 24 pass from Kemp (Mercer kick) FIRST WEEK Buff-Powell 27 pass from Kemp (Mercer kick) Buff-FG Mercer 51 DENVER 26, BOSTON 21 Buff-FG Mercer 43 Sunday, September 3 At Bears Stadium, attendance 35,488.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Results
    H DENVER BRONCOS ISTORY ­­ Miscellaneous & R ESULTS Year-by-Year Stats Postseason Records Honors History/Results 252 Staff/Coaches Players Roster Breakdown 2019 Season Staff/Coaches Players Roster Breakdown 2019 Season DENVER BRONCOS BRONCOS ALL-TIME DRAFT CHOICES NUMBER OF DRAFT CHOICES PER SCHOOL 20 — Florida 15 — Colorado, Georgia 14 — Miami (Fla.), Nebraska 13 — Louisiana State, Houston, Southern California 12 — Michigan State, Washington 11 — Arkansas, Arizona State, Michigan 10 — Iowa, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oregon 9 — Maryland, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Purdue, Virginia Tech 8 — Arizona, Clemson, Georgia Tech, Minnesota, Syracuse, Texas, Utah State, Washington State 7 — Baylor, Boise State, Boston College, Kansas, North Carolina, Penn State. 6 — Alabama, Auburn, Brigham Young, California, Florida A&M, Northwestern, Oklahoma State, San Diego, Tennessee, Texas A&M, UCLA, Utah, Virginia 5 — Alcorn State, Colorado State, Florida State, Grambling, Illinois, Mississippi State, Pittsburgh, San Jose State, Texas Christian, Tulane, Wisconsin 4 — Arkansas State, Bowling Green/Bowling Green State, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa State, Jackson State, Kansas State, Kentucky, Louisville, Maryland-Eastern Shore, Miami (Ohio), Missouri, Northern Arizona, Oregon State, Pacific, South Carolina, Southern, Stanford, Texas A&I/Texas A&M Kingsville, Texas Tech, Tulsa, Wyoming 3 — Detroit, Duke, Fresno State, Montana State, North Carolina State, North Texas State, Rice, Richmond, Tennessee State, Texas-El Paso, Toledo, Wake Forest, Weber State 2 — Alabama A&M, Bakersfield
    [Show full text]
  • Qualcomm Stadium City Council
    Qualcomm Stadium City Council City Manager QUALCOMM STADIUM Administration Custodial Financial Stadium Support Services Services Maintenance Services QUALCOMM Stadium Mission Statement To provide a first-class facility that is safe, attractive, and has a high-quality playing field for conducting and viewing athletic and entertainment events, and to accomplish this in a cost-effective and efficient manner. Department Description QUALCOMM Stadium is one of America's finest multi-purpose sports facilities. It is home to the San Diego Chargers of the National Football League (NFL), and the San Diego State University Aztecs of the Mountain West League. It is the site of the annual Holiday Bowl post-season college football game. The Stadium has hosted two All-Star baseball games, three Super Bowls, and numerous special events including Gold Cup Soccer, World Series games, Harvest Crusade, Super Cross races, concerts, and many more. San Diego Stadium was completed in August 1967 as a home for the San Diego Chargers at a cost of $27.5 million. The original seating capacity was 52,000. With the expansion of Major League Baseball, the San Diego Padres played their first game at the Stadium in 1969. In 1980, the Stadium was posthumously renamed in honor of San Diego Union Sports Editor Jack Murphy. The Stadium was expanded in 1983 at a cost of $9.1 million to increase the seating capacity to 60,100. It was expanded again in 1997 at a cost of $60 million. The expansion in 1997 resulted in increased seating capacity to 71,500. It also included development of Club level seating and air-conditioned lounges, 37 new luxury boxes, a new Jumbotron screen, and a host of other changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Selection and Financing Plan for a New Multi-Use Stadium in San Diego
    Site Selection and Financing Plan for a New Multi-Use Stadium in San Diego May 18, 2015 May 18, 2015 The Honorable Kevin L. Faulconer Mayor, City of San Diego 202 C Street San Diego, CA 92101 Dear Mayor Faulconer: It is our honor to submit our report entitled, “Site Selection & Financing Plan for a New Multi- Use Stadium in San Diego.” On January 30, 2015, you announced the creation of the Citizens’ Stadium Advisory Group (CSAG). You directed us to do two things: Select one of two proposed sites, and develop a fair and workable financing plan for a new multi-use stadium in San Diego. Faced with this unprecedented task and pressure from competing stadium dynamics in Los Angeles, CSAG has successfully met its goals. We did so in 108 days, or four months before our original deadline. We worked collaboratively with all stakeholders, reviewed an enormous amount of data from the past 12 years, hosted a public forum, interviewed dozens of industry experts and civic leaders and maintained an objective and independent eye toward solving one of the region’s largest public policy issues. As a result of our collaboration, we are pleased to present our plan as a blueprint for initiating negotiations with the San Diego Chargers. The attached report answers the two issues you asked us to resolve. A path to a new state-of- the-art stadium now exists in San Diego. We propose a stadium that is modern and efficient, occupying a smaller footprint than the existing stadium, and creating new opportunities and experiences for San Diegans and tourists.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bridges of San Diego County: the Art of Civil Engineering
    The Bridges of San Diego County: The Art of Civil Engineering Christine Robbins Every bridge represents a problem solved, a challenge overcome, a connection made. San Diego, with its abundance of hills, mesas, and canyons, showcases the art of bridge building. Civil engineers took on the task and were lauded for their work in this poem: They have built magnificent bridges where the nation’s highways go; O’er perilous mountain ridges and where great rivers flow. Wherever a link was needed between the new and the known They have left their marks of Progress, in iron and steel and stone. There was never a land too distant nor ever a way too wide, But some man’s mind, insistent, reached out to the other side. They cleared the way, these heroes, for the march of future years. The march of Civilization—and they were its Pioneers. —Portion of “The Bridge Builders,” a poem by Evelyn Simms The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) considers bridges an important aspect of civil engineering. According to the organization’s policy statement; “Bridges are a visible icon of the Civil Engineer’s art. Historic bridges are important links to our past, serve as safe and vital transportation routes in the Author Christine Robbins acknowledges contributions by Civil Engineers Tim Shell, PE, of the City of Vista and Wade Durant, PE, Pete Smith, PE, ENV SP, and Clark Fernon, PE, of T.Y. Lin International. The author wishes to acknowledge all those who generously shared their recollections of working on some of the bridges discussed in the article.
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Valley Stadium & Arena Development Proposal
    MISSION VALLEY STADIUM & ARENA DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL SPORTS & ENTERTAINMENT ANCHORED TRANSIT ORIENTED MULTI-USE URBAN VILLAGE HOK SPORTS – Proposed San Diego Chargers Stadium – Citizen’s Task Force on Charger Issues PROPOSED & PREPARED BY: JEFFREY M. RICE CB RICHARD ELLIS, INC CAPITAL MARKETS DEBT & EQUITY FINANCE COPYRIGHT PROTECTION CONFIDENTIALITY © CB Richard Ellis, Inc. (2007). All Rights Reserved. The information and content contained herein is strictly confidential and The information contained herein is proprietary professional literary and intended for the exclusive use of CB Richard Ellis, City of San Diego, architectural work product. The information contained herein is protected County of San Diego, A.G. Spanos, Chargers Football, LLC, National by international copyright laws as a collective work and/or a compilation, Football League, Major League Soccer, and Sports Arena Group 2000. containing literary and architectural work including pictorial and graphic work. The unauthorized disclosure, duplication, reproduction or dissemination of the information contained is subject to civil penalties and liabilities. Any duplication, reproduction, transmission or dissemination without the express written permission of CB Richard Ellis is strictly prohibited, and subject to civil and criminal penalties. EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATION Upon acceptance and agreement of the principles and content of the DISCLAIMER proposal contained herein, the parties involved hereby agree to engage CB Richard Ellis to represent all of the parties involved in negotiating the The information contained herein has been obtained from sources terms of a mutually acceptable agreement for the development of the deemed believable. While we do not doubt it accuracy, we have not existing stadium site in Mission Valley for a new football stadium and verified it and make no guaranty, warranty or representation about it.
    [Show full text]
  • Chargers Ballot Initiative
    707 Broadway, Suite 905, San Diego, CA 92101 P: (619) 234-6423 • F: (619) 234-7403 • www.sdcta.org CITY OF SAN DIEGO PROPOSITION C: THE CHARGERS’ “SAN DIEGO INTEGRATED CONVENTION CENTER EXPANSION/ STADIUM AND TOURISM INITIATIVE” August 2016 SDCTA Position: OPPOSE Rationale for Position: Even with optimistic and likely unrealistic assumptions and projections, overall revenue would fall significantly short of the estimated $1.15 billion, not including interest on public debt, needed by the City of San Diego to construct this integrated facility. The City of San Diego would likely have to service debt from the General Fund, which funds street repairs, programs for citizens, and other public services, in order to maintain its credit ratings and avoid higher financing charges for future debt. Title: Proposition C - San Diego Integrated Convention Center Expansion/ Stadium and Tourism Initiative Jurisdiction: City of San Diego Type: Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT or hotel tax), dedicated to specific purpose Vote: Two-thirds of Voters in the City of San Diego Status: On the November 8, 2016 General Election Ballot Issue: Tourism and Recreation Description: A 6% increase in the TOT to fund a new tourism marketing district (1%) and a new “Convention Center Expansion and Stadium Fund” (5%). Fiscal Impact: Even with optimistic and likely unrealistic assumptions and projections, overall revenue would fall short of the estimated $1.15 billion, not including interest, needed by the City of San Diego to construct this integrated facility. The City of San Diego would likely have to service debt from the General Fund, which pays for a wide range of public services, in order to maintain its credit ratings and avoid higher financing charges for future debt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Major League Baseball Attendance Analysis
    MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL 2014 ATTENDANCE ANALYSIS Compiled and Written by David P. Kronheim [email protected] © 2015 MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL 2014 ATTENDANCE ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGES Attendance Reporting Guidelines, Definition of a Sellout, Information Sources….….………………….……… 2-3 2014 Major League Attendance Overview, Summary, Team Highlights………….………………………….…. 4-9 Team-by-Team 2014 vs. 2013 Total Attendance Comparison Table……………………………………………. 10 2014 vs. 2013 Average Attendance per Date Comparison. Number of 2014 Sellouts by Team……………. 11 2014 Highlights and League Attendance Comparison………………………………………………..…..………. 12 Average Attendance per Team, 2014 Road Attendance Leaders, 2014 Attendance by Month……………… 13 ‘3 Million’ Seasons, 2014 Minor League Attendance, Biggest Crowds of 2014…………….…….…….……… 14-15 Season Total Attendance Milestones Reached by Each Team………………………………………………….. 16 Biggest Year-to-Year Attendance Changes………………………………………………………………………… 17 Spring Training Attendance, includes 2015………………………………………………………………………… 18-19 2014 Opening Day, World Baseball Classic, All-Star Game, and Post-Season Attendance………………….. 20 Rainy Season Report………………………………………………………………………………..……..………….. 21 Big Increases and Big Declines in Attendance in 2014……………………………………………………………. 22 The Economy and Major League Attendance. Era of Multi-Purpose Stadiums is Ending……………………. 23 Average Attendance per Home Date………………………………………………………………………………… 24 Interleague Games Attendance……………………………………………………………………………………… 25 Consecutive Game Sellout Streaks in Baseball and Other
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Alliance of American Football Media Guide
    ALLIANCE OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL INAUGURAL SEASON 2019 MEDIA GUIDE LAST UPDATED - 2.27.2019 1 ALLIANCE OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL INAUGURAL SEASON CONFERENCE CONFERENCE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS - 1 Page ALLIANCE OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL INAUGURAL SEASON Birth of The Alliance 4 2019 Week by Week Schedule 8 Alliance Championship Game 10 Alliance on the Air 12 National Media Inquiries 13 Executives 14 League History 16 Did You Know? 17 QB Draft 18 Game Officials 21 Arizona Hotshots 22 Atlanta Legends 32 Birmingham Iron 42 Memphis Express 52 Orlando Apollos 62 Salt Lake Stallions 72 San Antonio Commanders 82 San Diego Fleet 92 AAF SOCIAL Alliance of American Football /AAFLeague AAF.COM @TheAAF #JoinTheAlliance @TheAAF 3 BIRTH OF The Alliance OF AMERICAN FOOTBALL By Gary Myers Are you ready for some really good spring football? Well, here you go. The national crisis is over. The annual post-Super Bowl football withdrawal, a seemingly incurable malady that impacts millions every year the second weekend in February and lasts weeks and months, is now in the past thanks to The Alliance of American Football, the creation of Charlie Ebersol, a television and film producer, and Bill Polian, a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame. They have the football game plan, the business model with multiple big-money investors and a national television contract with CBS to succeed where other spring leagues have failed. The idea is not to compete with the National Football League. That’s a failed concept. The Alliance will complement the NFL and satisfy the insatiable appetite of football fans who otherwise would be suffering from a long period of depression.
    [Show full text]