DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2010.13645V4 [Math.NT] 11 Aug 2021 Ahmtclasc Faeiaaeia Ahmtclmont Mathematical American America of Assoc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2010.13645V4 [Math.NT] 11 Aug 2021 Ahmtclasc Faeiaaeia Ahmtclmont Mathematical American America of Assoc Mathematical Assoc. of America American Mathematical Monthly 121:1 August 12, 2021 12:41 a.m. Asymptotics˙on˙a˙Class˙of˙Legendre˙formulas˙˙Draft˙3.1˙.tex page 1 Asymptotics on a Class of Legendre Formulas Maiyu Diaz Abstract. Let f be a real-valued function of a single variable such that it is positive over the primes. In this article, we construct a factorial, n!f , associated to f, called the associated Legendre formula, or f-factorial, and show, subject to certain criteria, that n!f satisfies a weak Stirling approximation. As an application, we will give weak approximations to the Bhargava factorial over the set of primes and to a less well-known Legendre formula. 1. INTRODUCTION. The factorial function is a fundamental object of utmost im- portance, finding itself in various disciplines, including combinatorics, number theory, ring theory, and many others. Places where it arises include, but are not limited to, being a building block for binomial coefficients, being used to count the number of permutations of a collection of objects, and contributions to a major part of Taylor series expansions. The study of obtaining asymptotics to n! dates back to the 17th and 18th century, where, in particular, Abraham de Moivre showed that [5] n! Ke−nnn+1/2 ∼ for some constant K. Later, in the 18th century, James Stirling [8] was able to specify the constant: K = √2π. At the turn of the 21st century, Manjul Bhargava introduced a generalization of the factorial in [1]. Definition 1. Let S Z be arbitrary and fix a prime p. Construct a sequence ai i≥0, called a p-ordering of⊆S, of elements of S as follows: { } • Choose any element a0 S. • ∈ Choose an element a1 S that minimizes the highest power of p dividing a1 a0. • ∈ − In general, for each n 1, choose an element an S that minimizes the highest power of p dividing (a≥ a )(a a ) (a ∈a ). n − 0 n − 1 · · · n − n−1 If wp(a) denoes the highest power of p dividing a, then define v (S,p)= w ((a a )(a a ) (a a )). n p n − 0 n − 1 · · · n − n−1 arXiv:2010.13645v4 [math.NT] 11 Aug 2021 Then the Bhargava factorial over S, denoted n!S, is defined as n!S = vn(S,p). p Y The Bhargava factorial n!S, with S Z, satisfies four properties analogous to the factorial: ⊆ 1. For any nonnegative integers k and l, (k + l)!S is a multiple of k!Sl!S . 2. Let f be a primitive polynomial of degree k and let d(S,f) = gcd f(a) a S . Then d(S,f) divides k! . { | ∈ } S January 2014] ASYMPTOTICS ON LEGENDRE FORMULAS 1 Mathematical Assoc. of America American Mathematical Monthly 121:1 August 12, 2021 12:41 a.m. Asymptotics˙on˙a˙Class˙of˙Legendre˙formulas˙˙Draft˙3.1˙.tex page 2 3. Let a , a , . , a S be any n + 1 integers. Then the product 0 1 n ∈ (ai aj ) i<j − Y is a multiple of 0! 1! n! . S S · · · S 4. The number of polynomial functions from S to Z/nZ is given by n−1 n . gcd (n, k!S ) kY=0 Manjul Bhargava in [1] remarks the following: Question 31: What are analogues of Stirling’s formula for generalized factorials? In this article, we obtain weak asymptotic formulas for P, the set of primes, and a set S′, which we will define momentarily. Specifically, we prove the following theorems. Theorem 2. Let n!P denote the Bhargava factorial over the set of primes P. Then log(n + 1)!P = log n!+ Cn + o(n), where log p C = = 1.2269688 .... (p 1)2 p∈P X − Consider the sequence 1, 6, 360, 45360, 5443200, 359251200,... which can be found as sequence A202367 at www.oeis.org. While this sequence may not be obviously related to the Bhargava factorial, it is interesting to note that in [6], N. Mathur devised an algorithm to show that, for any sequence under spe- cific criteria, we can determine a set S Z associated with the sequence. From this, we can determine a set S′ associated with⊆ the sequence A202367; a quick computa- ′ tion of the first few terms of the set gives S = 2, 4, 16, 22,... , outputting n!S′ = 1, 1, 6, 360,... { } { } Theorem 3. Let n!S′ denote the Bhargava factorial over the set associated with the sequence A202367. Then log(n + 1)!S′ = log(2n)! + βn + o(n), where log p p β = 2 = 1.0676431 .... (p 1) (p 1)/2 p∈P − X − ⌈ − ⌉ 2 © THE MATHEMATICAL ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA [Monthly 121 Mathematical Assoc. of America American Mathematical Monthly 121:1 August 12, 2021 12:41 a.m. Asymptotics˙on˙a˙Class˙of˙Legendre˙formulas˙˙Draft˙3.1˙.tex page 3 The proofs of Theorems 2 and 3 will be given in Section 4. Each of the Bhargava factorials discussed in [1] and in sequence A202367 yields a Legendre formula that can be expressed as n k≥0 f(p)pk pP , (1) p∈P Y for some real-valued map f—as such, in determining the asymptotics for the Bhargava factorials discussed, we will investigate (1). In Section 2, we will define the associated Legendre formula for a real-valued map, or alternatively for the f-factorial, and prove specific properties about them and make connections with the Bhargava factorial. In Section 3, we will prove, under certain criteria for f, an asymptotic formula for the f-factorial—a general result that will provide approximations for the Bhargava factorial over P and S′. Due to the lack of assumptions on f, we consider classes of functions f that can be approximated “well-enough” by linear maps, which we will explain further in this section. In Section 4, we will apply our results from the previous section to certain classes of Legendre formulas obtained from the Bhargava factorial, including over P and S′ discussed earlier, and compare them to their respective asymptotics. 2. PRELIMINARIES. Before we proceed, we let x denote the floor function of a ⌊ ⌋ real number x, log denote the natural logarithm, and N = Z+ = 1, 2, 3,... denote the natural numbers. { } Definition 4. Let f : R R such that f is positive over P. The associated Legendre formula for f, or the f-factorial→ , is defined as n k≥0 f(p)pk n!f(x) = pP . p∈P Y For short, we may write n!f instead. Example 5. Let f(x)= x be the identity map; by Legendre’s formula, we have n k≥0 pk+1 n!x = n!= pP , p∈P Y with the sequence n! = 1, 1, 2, 6, 24, 120,... { x}n≥0 { } Example 6. Let f(x) = log x; we have n k≥0 pk log p n!log x = pP , p∈P Y with the sequence n! = 1, 2, 840, 1862340480,... { log x}n≥0 { } While the above examples produce interesting and known examples of Legendre formulas, there are other examples for which n!f is not defined. January 2014] ASYMPTOTICS ON LEGENDRE FORMULAS 3 Mathematical Assoc. of America American Mathematical Monthly 121:1 August 12, 2021 12:41 a.m. Asymptotics˙on˙a˙Class˙of˙Legendre˙formulas˙˙Draft˙3.1˙.tex page 4 Example 7. Let f(x)= sin x ; we have | | n k≥0 pk| sin p| n!| sin x| = pP . p∈P Y However, since csc x 1, we have | |≥ n n!| sin x| p , ≥ P pY∈ where the product diverges for n 1. Thus, n! is not defined for all n. ≥ | sin x| Based on this, we find, whenever f tends to infinity along P, that its f-factorial n!f is a natural number. In particular, one of the interesting facts about n!f is its being a natural number is equivalent to the first exponential term being a natural number; in addition, n!f is a natural number whenever we consider the classes of functions f mentioned previously. Theorem 8. Let f : R R be positive over P. The following are equivalent: → n 1. The sum log p converges to log k for some natural number k. P f(p) Xp∈ 2. n!f is a natural number. To prove Theorem 8 we shall first establish the following lemma. Lemma 9. Let bk 0 denote a strictly decreasing sequence of nonnegative integers; then the sequence defined≥ by bk ak = p , (2) p∈P Y with a0 assumed to be finite, is a strictly decreasing sequence of natural numbers such that a = a = = 1 for some N. N N+1 · · · Proof. Since bk is strictly decreasing, we have ak is strictly decreasing; furthermore, since bk is a strictly decreasing sequence of nonnegative integers, by the pigeon-hole principle, there exists an N such bN = bN+1 = = 0. Consequently, we have aN = a = = 1, as desired. · · · N+1 · · · Before we proceed to prove Theorem 8, using Lemma 9, we note that n!f shares some properties with the Bhargava factorial. Specificially, one of the properties they share is that n!f , like the Bhargava factorial, satisfies a binomial coefficient formula. Corollary 10. For arbitrary nonnegative integers n, k, the f-factorial (n + k)!f is a multiple of n!f k!f . In addition, n!f and the Bhargava factorial both satisfy a comparison theorem; that is, in [1, Lemma 13], M. Bhargava noted that if T,S are two subsets of Z and n!T , n!S are their respective Bhargava factorials such that T S, then n!S n!T for every n 0.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 18.01A Topic 5: Second Fundamental Theorem, Lnx As an Integral. Read
    18.01A Topic 5: Second fundamental theorem, ln x as an integral. Read: SN: PI, FT. 0 R b b First Fundamental Theorem: F = f ⇒ a f(x) dx = F (x)|a Questions: 1. Why dx? 2. Given f(x) does F (x) always exist? Answer to question 1. Pn R b a) Riemann sum: Area ≈ 1 f(ci)∆x → a f(x) dx In the limit the sum becomes an integral and the finite ∆x becomes the infinitesimal dx. b) The dx helps with change of variable. a b 1 Example: Compute R √ 1 dx. 0 1−x2 Let x = sin u. dx du = cos u ⇒ dx = cos u du, x = 0 ⇒ u = 0, x = 1 ⇒ u = π/2. 1 π/2 π/2 π/2 R √ 1 R √ 1 R cos u R Substituting: 2 dx = cos u du = du = du = π/2. 0 1−x 0 1−sin2 u 0 cos u 0 Answer to question 2. Yes → Second Fundamental Theorem: Z x If f is continuous and F (x) = f(u) du then F 0(x) = f(x). a I.e. f always has an anit-derivative. This is subtle: we have defined a NEW function F (x) using the definite integral. Note we needed a dummy variable u for integration because x was already taken. Z x+∆x f(x) proof: ∆area = f(x) dx 44 4 x Z x+∆x Z x o area = ∆F = f(x) dx − f(x) dx 0 0 = F (x + ∆x) − F (x) = ∆F. x x + ∆x ∆F But, also ∆area ≈ f(x) ∆x ⇒ ∆F ≈ f(x) ∆x or ≈ f(x).
    [Show full text]
  • The Enigmatic Number E: a History in Verse and Its Uses in the Mathematics Classroom
    To appear in MAA Loci: Convergence The Enigmatic Number e: A History in Verse and Its Uses in the Mathematics Classroom Sarah Glaz Department of Mathematics University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 [email protected] Introduction In this article we present a history of e in verse—an annotated poem: The Enigmatic Number e . The annotation consists of hyperlinks leading to biographies of the mathematicians appearing in the poem, and to explanations of the mathematical notions and ideas presented in the poem. The intention is to celebrate the history of this venerable number in verse, and to put the mathematical ideas connected with it in historical and artistic context. The poem may also be used by educators in any mathematics course in which the number e appears, and those are as varied as e's multifaceted history. The sections following the poem provide suggestions and resources for the use of the poem as a pedagogical tool in a variety of mathematics courses. They also place these suggestions in the context of other efforts made by educators in this direction by briefly outlining the uses of historical mathematical poems for teaching mathematics at high-school and college level. Historical Background The number e is a newcomer to the mathematical pantheon of numbers denoted by letters: it made several indirect appearances in the 17 th and 18 th centuries, and acquired its letter designation only in 1731. Our history of e starts with John Napier (1550-1617) who defined logarithms through a process called dynamical analogy [1]. Napier aimed to simplify multiplication (and in the same time also simplify division and exponentiation), by finding a model which transforms multiplication into addition.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications of the Exponential and Natural Logarithm Functions
    M06_GOLD7774_14_SE_C05.indd Page 254 09/11/16 7:31 PM localadmin /202/AW00221/9780134437774_GOLDSTEIN/GOLDSTEIN_CALCULUS_AND_ITS_APPLICATIONS_14E1 ... FOR REVIEW BY POTENTIAL ADOPTERS ONLY chapter 5SAMPLE Applications of the Exponential and Natural Logarithm Functions 5.1 Exponential Growth and Decay 5.4 Further Exponential Models 5.2 Compound Interest 5.3 Applications of the Natural Logarithm Function to Economics n Chapter 4, we introduced the exponential function y = ex and the natural logarithm Ifunction y = ln x, and we studied their most important properties. It is by no means clear that these functions have any substantial connection with the physical world. How- ever, as this chapter will demonstrate, the exponential and natural logarithm functions are involved in the study of many physical problems, often in a very curious and unex- pected way. 5.1 Exponential Growth and Decay Exponential Growth You walk into your kitchen one day and you notice that the overripe bananas that you left on the counter invited unwanted guests: fruit flies. To take advantage of this pesky situation, you decide to study the growth of the fruit flies colony. It didn’t take you too FOR REVIEW long to make your first observation: The colony is increasing at a rate that is propor- tional to its size. That is, the more fruit flies, the faster their number grows. “The derivative is a rate To help us model this population growth, we introduce some notation. Let P(t) of change.” See Sec. 1.7, denote the number of fruit flies in your kitchen, t days from the moment you first p.
    [Show full text]
  • Calculus Terminology
    AP Calculus BC Calculus Terminology Absolute Convergence Asymptote Continued Sum Absolute Maximum Average Rate of Change Continuous Function Absolute Minimum Average Value of a Function Continuously Differentiable Function Absolutely Convergent Axis of Rotation Converge Acceleration Boundary Value Problem Converge Absolutely Alternating Series Bounded Function Converge Conditionally Alternating Series Remainder Bounded Sequence Convergence Tests Alternating Series Test Bounds of Integration Convergent Sequence Analytic Methods Calculus Convergent Series Annulus Cartesian Form Critical Number Antiderivative of a Function Cavalieri’s Principle Critical Point Approximation by Differentials Center of Mass Formula Critical Value Arc Length of a Curve Centroid Curly d Area below a Curve Chain Rule Curve Area between Curves Comparison Test Curve Sketching Area of an Ellipse Concave Cusp Area of a Parabolic Segment Concave Down Cylindrical Shell Method Area under a Curve Concave Up Decreasing Function Area Using Parametric Equations Conditional Convergence Definite Integral Area Using Polar Coordinates Constant Term Definite Integral Rules Degenerate Divergent Series Function Operations Del Operator e Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Deleted Neighborhood Ellipsoid GLB Derivative End Behavior Global Maximum Derivative of a Power Series Essential Discontinuity Global Minimum Derivative Rules Explicit Differentiation Golden Spiral Difference Quotient Explicit Function Graphic Methods Differentiable Exponential Decay Greatest Lower Bound Differential
    [Show full text]
  • Approximation of Logarithm, Factorial and Euler- Mascheroni Constant Using Odd Harmonic Series
    Mathematical Forum ISSN: 0972-9852 Vol.28(2), 2020 APPROXIMATION OF LOGARITHM, FACTORIAL AND EULER- MASCHERONI CONSTANT USING ODD HARMONIC SERIES Narinder Kumar Wadhawan1and Priyanka Wadhawan2 1Civil Servant,Indian Administrative Service Now Retired, House No.563, Sector 2, Panchkula-134112, India 2Department Of Computer Sciences, Thapar Institute Of Engineering And Technology, Patiala-144704, India, now Program Manager- Space Management (TCS) Walgreen Co. 304 Wilmer Road, Deerfield, Il. 600015 USA, Email :[email protected],[email protected] Received on: 24/09/ 2020 Accepted on: 16/02/ 2021 Abstract We have proved in this paper that natural logarithm of consecutive numbers ratio, x/(x-1) approximatesto 2/(2x - 1) where x is a real number except 1. Using this relation, we, then proved, x approximates to double the sum of odd harmonic series having first and last terms 1/3 and 1/(2x - 1) respectively. Thereafter, not limiting to consecutive numbers ratios, we extended its applicability to all the real numbers. Based on these relations, we, then derived a formula for approximating the value of Factorial x.We could also approximate the value of Euler-Mascheroni constant. In these derivations, we used only and only elementary functions, thus this paper is easily comprehensible to students and scholars alike. Keywords:Numbers, Approximation, Building Blocks, Consecutive Numbers Ratios, NaturalLogarithm, Factorial, Euler Mascheroni Constant, Odd Numbers Harmonic Series. 2010 AMS classification:Number Theory 11J68, 11B65, 11Y60 125 Narinder Kumar Wadhawan and Priyanka Wadhawan 1. Introduction By applying geometric approach, Leonhard Euler, in the year 1748, devised methods of determining natural logarithm of a number [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Section 7.2, Integration by Parts
    Section 7.2, Integration by Parts Homework: 7.2 #1{57 odd 2 So far, we have been able to integrate some products, such as R xex dx. They have been able to be solved by a u-substitution. However, what happens if we can't solve it by a u-substitution? For example, consider R xex dx. For this, we will need a technique called integration by parts. 0 0 From the product rule for derivatives, we know that Dx[u(x)v(x)] = u (x)v(x) + u(x)v (x). Rear- ranging this and integrating, we see that: 0 0 u(x)v (x) = Dx[u(x)v(x)] − u (x)v(x) Z Z Z 0 0 u(x)v (x) dx = Dx[u(x)v(x)] dx − u (x)v(x) dx This gives us the formula needed for integration by parts: Z Z u(x)v0(x) dx = u(x)v(x) − u0(x)v(x) dx; or, we can write it as Z Z u dv = uv − v du In this section, we will practice choosing u and v properly. Examples Perform each of the following integrations: 1. R xex dx Let u = x, and dv = ex dx. Then, du = dx and v = ex. Using our formula, we get that Z Z xex dx = xex − ex dx = xex − ex + C R lnpx 2. x dx Since we do not know how to integrate ln x, let u = ln x and dv = x−1=2. Then du = 1=x and v = 2x1=2, so Z ln x Z p dx = 2x1=2 ln x − 2x−1=2 dx x = 2x1=2 ln x − 4x1=2 + C 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logarithmic Chicken Or the Exponential Egg: Which Comes First?
    The Logarithmic Chicken or the Exponential Egg: Which Comes First? Marshall Ransom, Senior Lecturer, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Georgia Southern University Dr. Charles Garner, Mathematics Instructor, Department of Mathematics, Rockdale Magnet School Laurel Holmes, 2017 Graduate of Rockdale Magnet School, Current Student at University of Alabama Background: This article arose from conversations between the first two authors. In discussing the functions ln(x) and ex in introductory calculus, one of us made good use of the inverse function properties and the other had a desire to introduce the natural logarithm without the classic definition of same as an integral. It is important to introduce mathematical topics using a minimal number of definitions and postulates/axioms when results can be derived from existing definitions and postulates/axioms. These are two of the ideas motivating the article. Thus motivated, the authors compared manners with which to begin discussion of the natural logarithm and exponential functions in a calculus class. x A related issue is the use of an integral to define a function g in terms of an integral such as g()() x f t dt . c We believe that this is something that students should understand and be exposed to prior to more advanced x x sin(t ) 1 “surprises” such as Si(x ) dt . In particular, the fact that ln(x ) dt is extremely important. But t t 0 1 must that fact be introduced as a definition? Can the natural logarithm function arise in an introductory calculus x 1 course without the
    [Show full text]
  • 3.6 Derivatives of Logarithmic Functions Y = Ln X ⇐⇒ Ey = X =⇒ Ey
    3.6 Derivatives of Logarithmic Functions Recall how to differentiate inverse functions using implicit differentiation. Since the natural loga- rithm is the inverse function of the natural exponential, we have dy dy 1 1 y = ln x ey = x = ey = 1 = = = () ) dx ) dx ey x y We have therefore proved the first part of the following The- 3 orem: the remainder follow immediately using the log laws and chain rule. 2 y = 1 d 1 x Theorem. If x > 0 then ln x = • dx x 1 d 1 If x = 0, then ln x = • 6 dx j j x 3 2 1123 − − − d d ln x 1 1 x log x = = − y = ln x • dx a dx ln a x ln a | | 2 d d − ax = ex ln a = (ln a)ex ln a = (ln a)ax • dx dx 3 − The last two parts of the Theorem illustrate why calculus always uses the natural logarithm and expo- nential. Any other base causes an extra factor of ln a to appear in the derivative. Recall that ln e = 1, so that this factor never appears for the natural functions. Example We can combine these rules with the chain rule. For example: d 1 d 2x log (x2 + 7) = (x2 + 7) = dx 4 (x2 + 7)(ln 4) · dx (x2 + 7)(ln 4) Logarithmic Differentiation This is a powerful technique, allowing us to use the log laws to simplify an expression before differ- entiating. For example, suppose that you wanted to differentiate 3x2 + 1 g(x) = ln p1 + x2 Blindly applying the chain rule, we would treat g as ln(lump), then be stuck with a hideously un- pleasant quotient rule calculation: d 3x2 + 1 1 d 3x2 + 1 p1 + x2 d 3x2 + 1 g0(x) = ln = 2 = dx p1 + x2 3x +1 dx p1 + x2 3x2 + 1 dx p1 + x2 p1+x2 p1 + x2 6xp1 + x2 (3x2 + 1) x(1 + x2) 1/2 = − · − 3x2 + 1 · 1 + x2 1 6x(1 + x2) (3x2 + 1) x x(3x2 + 5) = − · = 3x2 + 1 · 1 + x2 (3x2 + 1)(1 + x2) 1 Thankfully there is a better way: apply the logarithm laws first, 3x2 + 1 1 g(x) = ln = ln(3x2 + 1) ln(1 + x2) p1 + x2 − 2 and then differentiate: 1 d 2 1 d 2 g0(x) = (3x + 1) (1 + x ) 3x2 + 1 dx − 2(1 + x2) dx 6x x = 3x2 + 1 − 1 + x2 A little algebra shows that we have the same solution, in a much simpler way.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Logarithms and Exponentials: Logx and E
    Chapter 8 Logarithms and Exponentials: log x and ex These two functions are ones with which you already have some familiarity. Both are in- troduced in many high school curricula, as they have widespread applications in both the scientific and financial worlds. In fact, as recently as 50 years ago, many high school math- ematics curricula included considerable study of “Tables of the Logarithm Function” (“log tables”), because this was prior to the invention of the hand-held calculator. During the Great Depression of the 1930’s, many out-of-work mathematicians and scientists were em- ployed as “calculators” or “computers” to develop these tables by hand, laboriously using difference equations, entry by entry! Here, we are going to use our knowledge of the Fun- damental Theorem of Calculus and the Inverse Function Theorem to develop the properties of the Logarithm Function and Exponential Function. Of course, we don’t need tables of these functions any more because it is possible to buy a hand-held electronic calculator for as little as $10.00, which will compute any value of these functions to 10 decimal places or more! 1 2 CHAPTER 8. LOGARITHMS AND EXPONENTIALS: LOG X AND EX 8.1 The Logarithm Function Define log(x) (which we shall be thinking of as the natural logarithm) by the following: Definition 8.1 x 1 log(x)= dt for x>0. 1 t Theorem 8.1 log x is defined for all x>0. It is everywhere differentiable, hence continuous, and is a 1-1 function. The Range of log x is (−∞, ∞).
    [Show full text]
  • The Indefinite Logarithm, Logarithmic Units, and the Nature of Entropy
    The Indefinite Logarithm, Logarithmic Units, and the Nature of Entropy Michael P. Frank FAMU-FSU College of Engineering Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering 2525 Pottsdamer St., Rm. 341 Tallahassee, FL 32310 [email protected] August 20, 2017 Abstract We define the indefinite logarithm [log x] of a real number x> 0 to be a mathematical object representing the abstract concept of the logarithm of x with an indeterminate base (i.e., not specifically e, 10, 2, or any fixed number). The resulting indefinite logarithmic quantities naturally play a mathematical role that is closely analogous to that of dimensional physi- cal quantities (such as length) in that, although these quantities have no definite interpretation as ordinary numbers, nevertheless the ratio of two of these entities is naturally well-defined as a specific, ordinary number, just like the ratio of two lengths. As a result, indefinite logarithm objects can serve as the basis for logarithmic spaces, which are natural systems of logarithmic units suitable for measuring any quantity defined on a log- arithmic scale. We illustrate how logarithmic units provide a convenient language for explaining the complete conceptual unification of the dis- parate systems of units that are presently used for a variety of quantities that are conventionally considered distinct, such as, in particular, physical entropy and information-theoretic entropy. 1 Introduction The goal of this paper is to help clear up what is perceived to be a widespread arXiv:physics/0506128v1 [physics.gen-ph] 15 Jun 2005 confusion that can found in many popular sources (websites, popular books, etc.) regarding the proper mathematical status of a variety of physical quantities that are conventionally defined on logarithmic scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.2. the Natural Logarithm Function
    3.2. THE NATURAL LOGARITHM FUNCTION 137 3.2 The natural logarithm function We further examine some exponential growth/decay contexts considered in Section 3.1, and de- velop some tools to solve certain kinds of problems that arise in those contexts. Solving the equation ea = b In Section 3.1, we solved exponential growth and decay problems problems of the “how large/how much” variety. That is: using formulas like kt kt P = P0e and R = R0e− , (3.2.1) we were able to answer some questions like “how large is this population after that many years,” or “how much of this radioactive substance is left after that many hours?” Answers to such problems entail simply putting the appropriate value of t into the appropriate formula (3.2.1) for the exponentially growing/decaying substance. What we have not yet considered are answers to “how long” questions, in exponential growth/decay situations. That is, how do we solve equations like (3.2.1) for t,givenvaluesoftheothervariables and constants involved? For example, consider the following. Example 3.2.1. Suppose a population, initially comprising 100,000 persons, is growing at the per capita rate of k = 3birthsperthousandpersonsperyear. (a) Write down an initial value problem modeling this situation. (b) How large will this population be 37 years from now? (c) How long will it take the population to double? Solution. (a) Denoting time in months by t,andpopulationinindividualsbyP (t),wehavethe initial value problem P 0(t)=0.003P (t); P (0) = 100,000. (b) Using the results of Section 3.1, we know that the solution to the problem is the exponential function P (t)=100,000 e0.003t.
    [Show full text]
  • Leonhard Euler English Version
    LEONHARD EULER (April 15, 1707 – September 18, 1783) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK , Germany Without a doubt, LEONHARD EULER was the most productive mathematician of all time. He wrote numerous books and countless articles covering a vast range of topics in pure and applied mathematics, physics, astronomy, geodesy, cartography, music, and shipbuilding – in Latin, French, Russian, and German. It is not only that he produced an enormous body of work; with unbelievable creativity, he brought innovative ideas to every topic on which he wrote and indeed opened up several new areas of mathematics. Pictured on the Swiss postage stamp of 2007 next to the polyhedron from DÜRER ’s Melencolia and EULER ’s polyhedral formula is a portrait of EULER from the year 1753, in which one can see that he was already suffering from eye problems at a relatively young age. EULER was born in Basel, the son of a pastor in the Reformed Church. His mother also came from a family of pastors. Since the local school was unable to provide an education commensurate with his son’s abilities, EULER ’s father took over the boy’s education. At the age of 14, EULER entered the University of Basel, where he studied philosophy. He completed his studies with a thesis comparing the philosophies of DESCARTES and NEWTON . At 16, at his father’s wish, he took up theological studies, but he switched to mathematics after JOHANN BERNOULLI , a friend of his father’s, convinced the latter that LEONHARD possessed an extraordinary mathematical talent. At 19, EULER won second prize in a competition sponsored by the French Academy of Sciences with a contribution on the question of the optimal placement of a ship’s masts (first prize was awarded to PIERRE BOUGUER , participant in an expedition of LA CONDAMINE to South America).
    [Show full text]