In Vivo Pharmacological Profiling in Xenopus Embryos Defines a Subset of A1 Adenosine Receptor-Selective Antagonists with Potent
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Aus dem Biomedizinischen Zentrum Institut für Chirurgische Forschung (Walter-Brendel-Zentrum für experimentelle Medizin) der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Kommissarischer Vorstand: Prof. Dr. med. dent. Reinhard Hickel In vivo pharmacological profiling in Xenopus embryos defines a subset of A1 adenosine receptor-selective antagonists with potent anti-angiogenic activities Dissertation zum Erwerb des Doktorgrades der Naturwissenschaften an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München vorgelegt von Mazhar Gull aus Pakistan 2016 Mit Genehmigung der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität München Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. phil. André W. Brändli Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Ralph A.W. Rupp Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. dent. Reinhard Hickel Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 07.07.2017 “You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” R. Buckminster Fuller Table of Contents: Table of figures ........................................................................................ IX Table of tables ......................................................................................... XI Abstract ................................................................................................ XIII Zusammenfassung ................................................................................. XIV Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 A chemical genetic screen in Xenopus embryos defines adenosine receptor antagonists as modulators of the vasculature ............................................. 2 G-protein coupled receptors constitute key mediators of cellular response ..... 7 Structural diversity of the GPCR superfamily .............................................. 8 Guanosine nucleotide-binding proteins ..................................................... 12 GPCR activation and signaling ................................................................. 14 Adenosine ............................................................................................ 16 The adenosine receptor family of GPCRs .................................................. 18 AR signaling and biological functions ....................................................... 19 Crystal structures of adenosine receptors ................................................. 23 Expression of adenosine receptors .......................................................... 29 Genetic analysis of adenosine receptor functions ....................................... 31 Roles for adenosine receptors in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis......... 33 Adenosine receptors as therapeutic targets .............................................. 37 Hypothesis and Aims ............................................................................. 40 V Materials and methods .............................................................................. 41 Obtaining Xenopus embryos ................................................................... 42 Pharmacological treatments of Xenopus embryos ...................................... 43 Whole mount in situ hybridizations .......................................................... 45 Marker genes for antisense probe synthesis ............................................. 49 Microinjection of morpholino oligonucleotides ........................................... 49 Mammalian cell culture .......................................................................... 49 Chemical treatments and immunostaining of cell cultures .......................... 50 FACS analysis of A1 AR antagonist treated cells ......................................... 50 Proliferation and sprouting assays ........................................................... 51 Results ................................................................................................... 53 Reanalysis of an in vivo chemical library screen defines AR-subtype specific antagonists for testing in Xenopus embryos ............................................. 54 Widespread expression of ARs in Xenopus embryos ................................... 59 Antagonists with selectivity for A1 ARs are effective at inducing edema in Xenopus embryos ................................................................................. 61 Combination treatments with antagonists targeting A2A, A2B or A3 ARs were ineffective at inducing edema formation ................................................... 65 AR antagonists affecting blood and lymph vessel morphogenesis ................ 68 DEPX and 7CN treatments disrupt lymph vessel morphogenesis .................. 70 7CN and DEPX specific antagonists did not affect hematopoiesis, erythrocyte dispersal and muscle differentiation ......................................................... 73 VI Effects of DEPX and 7CN on endothelial cell proliferation and sprouting in vitro .......................................................................................................... 75 Structure-activity relationship studies ...................................................... 78 The in vivo activity of DEPX is influenced by side chain length .................... 78 Endothelial cell proliferation is not affected by DEPX derivatives.................. 84 The in vivo activity of 7CN requires the presence of a phenyl ring ............... 85 7MN inhibits endothelial cell proliferation and sprouting ............................. 89 7MN and 7CN cause mitotic arrest in vitro ................................................ 91 7MN and 7CN disrupt the microtubular cytoskeleton .................................. 93 Discussion ............................................................................................... 96 In vivo identification of vascular disruptive agents .................................... 97 Xenopus embryos as a powerful model to identify the vascular disruptive agents in vivo ....................................................................................... 98 AR agonists fail to induce edema in Xenopus embryos ............................. 100 Pharmacological inhibition of A2A, A2B or A3 AR signaling does not affect vascular development .......................................................................... 101 A1 AR antagonists induce edema in vivo ................................................. 102 Only a subset of A1 AR antagonists affect blood and lymph vessel development in vivo ............................................................................................... 104 Structure-activity relationship studies reveal critical molecular determinants for bioactivity in vivo ........................................................................... 105 Physicochemical properties and in vivo bioactivities of AR antagonists ....... 108 Endothelial cells are direct targets of 7CN and 7MN ................................. 109 VII DEPX and DPPX exert their anti-angiogenic activities via an indirect mechanism ........................................................................................ 109 7CN and 7MN inhibit endothelial cell proliferation and sprouting by destabilization of the microtubular cytoskeleton ...................................... 111 Tissue and cell-type selectivities of the active compounds ........................ 112 Conclusions ........................................................................................... 115 Outlook................................................................................................. 116 Bibliography .......................................................................................... 119 Acknowledgements ................................................................................ 132 Deklaration ........................................................................................... 134 Appendix .............................................................................................. 135 Abbreviation ....................................................................................... 135 Curriculum Vitae ................................................................................. 138 VIII Table of figures Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the relationship between the blood circulation and the lymphatic system. .......................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Two-step whole-organism based chemical library screening strategy to identify modulators of vascular development in Xenopus embryos. ................... 5 Figure 3. Human GPCR superfamily sequence homology tree. ........................ 10 Figure 4. GPCR subfamilies and their ligands. .............................................. 11 Figure 5. Classification, expression, and function of G protein α subunit family members. ............................................................................................... 13 Figure 6. Diversity of GPCRs activation and signaling. ................................... 15 Figure 7. Structures and extracellular degradation of ATP to adenosine. .......... 17 Figure 8. Overview of the intracellular signaling pathways activated by ARs. ... 22 Figure 9. Agonist bound crystal structure of A2A AR. ..................................... 26 Figure 10. Comparison of the ligand binding sites of A2A adenosine receptors bound to various ligands. .......................................................................... 28 Figure 11. General structural