DOCSLIB.ORG

Reading a Mitek Shop Drawing 1234 SHOP1 CATHEDRAL 1 4 1 1 Job Name 7.500 S Nov 26 2013 Mitek Industries, Inc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reading a Mitek Shop Drawing 1234 SHOP1 CATHEDRAL 1 4 1 1 Job Name 7.500 S Nov 26 2013 Mitek Industries, Inc Job Truss Truss Type Qty Ply 1 2 3 5 6 Reading a MiTek Shop Drawing 1234 SHOP1 CATHEDRAL 1 4 1 1 Job name 7.500 s Nov 26 2013 MiTek Industries, Inc. Mon Apr 07 08:50:23 2014 Page 1 2 Truss label 8a 7 3 Truss type 4-0-0 5-0-0 12-0-0 19-0-0 25-0-14 31-1-11 38-0-0 40-0-0 4-0-0 1-0-0 7-0-0 7-0-0 6-0-14 6-0-14 6-10-5 2-0-0 4 Truss quantity 8b 5 Number of plies Scale = 1:67.1 5x6 9 6 Job description 6 7 Software version 10 11 7.14 12 8a Cumulated dimensions of top chord – panel lengths are added together along the top chord of truss 21 8.00 12 20 8b Panel lengths of the top chord – each section represents the horizontal distance between the centerline of two T4 3x4 consecutive panel points along the top chord W7 7 3x5 9 Drawing scale of the truss 12 13 5 T3 – inches of vertical rise for each 12 inches of horizontal run W8 3x6 10 Top chord slope W6 8 11 Top chord member label – identification label used to distinguish pieces 11-7-15 B4 1.5x4 B3 15 W9 3x6 15 14 9 12 Truss height – the height of the truss from the top of the bearing to the top of the top chord (trusses with multiple W5 7x8 13 levels of top chord will have multiple truss height dimensions) 3x7 4 W10 4.00 12 16 4x6 5x5 13 Plate size and orientation – plate size in inches and the two lines denote the direction of the plate 3x6 4.33 12 3 T2 12 B5 6-8-0 2 4.00 12 T5 W4 B2 17 3x4 22 14 Continuous lateral bracing location W3 3x9 1 T1 W1W2 10 15 Web member label B1 0-3-15 11 16 Heel height – the height from the top of the bearing to the top of the top chord at the outside edge of the bearing 3x5 17 19 18 18 3x10 1.5x4 5x7 17 Bottom chord slope – inches of vertical rise for each 12 inches of horizontal run 16 18 Bearing – a structural support, usually a wall or beam that is designated to carry the truss reaction loads to the 19a 5-0-0 foundation 4-0-0 4-8-8 12-0-0 22-0-0 29-7-4 38-0-0 4-0-0 0-8-8 7-0-0 10-0-0 7-7-4 8-4-12 19a Cumulated dimensions of bottom chord – panel lengths are added together along the bottom chord 19b 0-3-8 19b Panel lengths of the bottom chord – each section represents the horizontal distance between the centerline of two Overall Truss Height: 12-10-0 20 consecutive panel points along the bottom chord Plate Offsets (X, Y): [6:0-3-7,0-2-8], [10:0-1-2,0-0-5], [13:0-3-0,0-0-0], [17:0-2-12,0-1-3], [18:0-5-4,0-2-3] 20 Plate offsets (X, Y) – section lists any horizontal and/or vertical plate offsets (in inches) and the location they occur – rake distance from the bottom outside edge of the bottom chord to the highest point of the top chord Heel to Peak: Left: 4-4-0, Right: 22-3-8 Overhang Rake Distance: Left: 0-0-0, Right: 2-3-15 21 Heel to peak 21 22 23 at the first top chord pitch break Qty: 1 Span: 38-0-0 Slope: 4.00/12, 4.00/12 Overhang: 0-0-0, 2-0-0 Loading: 20.0-10.0-0.0-10.0 Spacing: 2-0-0 o.c. Camber: 3/4 in Weight: 193 lb Board Feet: 96.67 bft Specified camber may not be appropriate for this truss. Last saved: February 4 , 2014 22 Rake overhang length – feet-inches-sixteenths 24 –––=== CHORDS ===––– (Sq Cut = 90) 25 26 23 Information bar – contains information about the following: PIECE T5 PIECE: B1 PIECE W2 90.0 59.3 90.0 18.4 34.8 • Qty: quantity of trusses (1) 2x4 (1) 2x4 88.9 (1) 2x4 No.1 SP - 14’ No.2 SP - 5’ 90.0 34.8 No.3 SP - 2’ 55.2 • Span: truss span feet-inches-sixteenths OL: 12-7-5 CL: 12-6-4 LS: 12-7-5 OL: 5-0-0 CL: 4-7-8 LS: 5-0-0 PL: 5-0-0 OL: 1-2-14 CL: 1-2-14 LS: 1-0-6 PIECE B5 0-9-12 PIECE W9 • Slope: top chord slope, bottom chord slope 90.0 10.9 45.4 13.9 (1) 2x4 70.2 SCARF: 0-10-4 0-3-4 (1) 2x4 No.1 SP - 16’ No.3 SP - 8’ • Overhang: length of left and right overhang in horizontal dimension feet-inches-sixteenths, 19.8 0-0-4 24.8 45.4 OL: 14-0-15 CL: 13-11-2 LS: 13-9-10 PL: 14-1-6 OL: 6-4-8 CL: 6-4-8 LS: 5-11-0 • Loading: design loading (PSF – pound per square foot) top chord live load - top chord dead load – bottom chord TS: 13-2-1 0-10-13 –––==== WEBS ====––– (Sq Cut = 90) PIECE W6 SCARF: 0-11-0 0-2-1 PIECE W7 55.9 38.5 live load - bottom chord dead load BUTT: 0-0-4 30.0 29.3 (1) 2x4 SEAT: 0-3-8 0-1-3 (1) 2x4 23.2 No.3 SP - 10’ 85.2 • Spacing: the on-center distance between trusses feet-inches-sixteenths SS: 13-9-10 0-3-5 29.3 No.2 SP - 8’ 79.1 OL: 9-8-15 CL: 9-8-15 LS: 9-5-9 OL: 6-1-9 CL: 6-1-9 LS: 5-10-2 PIECE W4 • Camber: upward curvature built into the truss to counteract dead load deflections, inches 28.6 90.0 71.6 PIECE W5 95.1 (1) 2x4 2x4 56.3 No.2 SP (1) 2x4 13.3 No.3 SP - 8’ 95.1 • Weight: overall weight of lumber for an individual truss in pounds, (1) B2 OL: 12-0-0 CL: 11-11-7 LS: 12-0-0 No.3 SP - 5’ 71.6 OL: 6-10-14 CL: 6-10-9 LS: 6-7-8 (1) B3 OL: 6-0-3 CL: 5-11-10 LS: 6-0-3 OL: 4-1-13 CL: 4-0-1 LS: 4-0-10 • Board feet: overall length of board feet for an individual truss multiplied by the quantity of trusses, in feet PIECE B4 PIECE W3 90.0 70.2 56.3 90.0 • Last saved: design completion date (1) 2x4 (1) 2x4 No.2 SP - 3’ No.3 SP - 2’ 27 28 24 Piece – Label of truss member OL: 3-0-0 CL: 2-11-6 LS: 3-0-0 OL: 1-8-4 CL: 1-7-1 LS: 1-8-4 PIECE T4 PIECE W1 25 Chords/Webs/Others – Saw Angulation (defines how angles are measured based on square cut) 90.0 59.3 90.0 (1) 2x4 71.6 (1) 2x4 26 Lumber information – (quantity) lumber size/lumber grade and species – board length to use No.2 SP - 12’ No.3 SP - 2’ OL: 12-0-0 CL: 11-10-15 LS: 12-0-0 OL: 1-0-12 CL: 1-0-3 LS: 1-0-12 – overall length of pieces: feet-inches-sixteenths ® 27 OL PIECE W10 90.0 56.3 60.2 60.5 CL – centerline length (length along the centerline of a piece: feet-inches-sixteenths 2x4 (1) 2x4 No.3 SP - 2’ No.2 SP 49.3 LS – long side (length of the longest side) PLUMB LENGTH (1) T3 OL: 15-2-10 CL: 15-1-3 LS: 15-2-10 OL: 1-10-3 CL: 1-9-3 LS: 1-8-11 (1) T2 OL: 3-0-0 CL: 2-10-14 LS: 3-0-0 PIECE W8 PL – plumb length: feet-inches-sixteenths OVERALL LENGTH 87.0 63.0 PIECE T1 (1) 2x4 SCARF 71.6 SCARF – feet-inches-sixteenths (1) 2x4 52.1 No.3 SP - 4’ 57.7 71.6 No.2 SP - 5’ OL: 3-4-10 CL: 3-4-10 LS: 3-3-11 28 Angle cut information in degrees OL: 4-3-12 CL: 4-2-10 LS: 4-2-10 LONG SIDE CENTER LINE LENGTH www.mitek-us.com Tech Support 1-866-MITEK-TS (1-866-648-3587) FAX 314-434-5343 Online Training Registration http://www.mitek-us.com/MiTek.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solid Truss to Shell Numerical Homogenization of Prefabricated Composite Slabs
    materials Article Solid Truss to Shell Numerical Homogenization of Prefabricated Composite Slabs Natalia Staszak 1, Tomasz Garbowski 2 and Anna Szymczak-Graczyk 3,* 1 Research and Development Department, FEMat Sp. z o. o., Romana Maya 1, 61-371 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Biosystems Engineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 50, 60-627 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] 3 Department of Construction and Geoengineering, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Pi ˛atkowska94 E, 60-649 Pozna´n,Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The need for quick and easy deflection calculations of various prefabricated slabs causes simplified procedures and numerical tools to be used more often. Modelling of full 3D finite element (FE) geometry of such plates is not only uneconomical but often requires the use of complex software and advanced numerical knowledge. Therefore, numerical homogenization is an excellent tool, which can be easily employed to simplify a model, especially when accurate modelling is not necessary. Homogenization allows for simplifying a computational model and replacing a complicated composite structure with a homogeneous plate. Here, a numerical homogenization method based on strain energy equivalence is derived. Based on the method proposed, the structure of the prefabricated concrete slabs reinforced with steel spatial trusses is homogenized to a single plate element with an effective stiffness. There is a complete equivalence between the full 3D FE model built with solid elements combined with truss structural elements and the simplified Citation: Staszak, N.; Garbowski, T.; Szymczak-Graczyk, A. Solid Truss to homogenized plate FE model.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Types in NSW Historical Overviews 2006
    Timber Truss Bridges Study of Relative Heritage Significance of All Timber Truss Road Bridges in NSW 1998 25 Historical Overview of Bridge Types in NSW: Extract from the Study of Relative Heritage Significance of all Timber Truss Road Bridges in NSW HISTORY OF TIMBER TRUSS BRIDGES IN NSW 1.1 GENERAL During the first fifty years of the colony of New South Wales, 1788 - 1838, settlement was confined to the narrow coastal strip between the Pacific Ocean and the Great Dividing Range. The scattered communities were well served by ships plying the east coast and its many navigable rivers. Figure 1.1a: Settlement of early colonial NSW. Shaded areas are settled. In Governor Macquarie's time between 1810-1822, a number of good roads were built, but despite his efforts and those of the subsequent Governors Darling and Bourke, and of road builders George Evans, William Cox and Thomas Mitchell, the road system and its associated bridges could only be described as primitive. Many roads and bridges were financed through public subscriptions or as private ventures, particularly where tolls could be levied. The first significant improvement to this situation occurred in late 1832 when Surveyor- General Mitchell observed a competent stone mason working on a wall in front of the Legislative Council Chambers in Macquarie Street. It was David LennoxR3. He was appointed Sub-Inspector of Roads on October 1, 1832 then Superintendent of Bridges on June 6, 1833. His first project was to span a gully for the newly formed Mitchell's Pass on the eastern side of the Blue Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning the Methods of Engineering Analysis Using Case Studies, Excel and VBA - Course Design
    Computers in Education, Session 1520 Learning the Methods of Engineering Analysis Using Case Studies, Excel and VBA - Course Design Michael A. Collura, Bouzid Aliane, Samuel Daniels, Jean Nocito-Gobel School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of New Haven Abstract Methods of Engineering Analysis, EAS 112, is a first year course in which engineering and applied science students learn how to apply a variety of computer analysis methods. The course uses a “problem-driven” approach in which case studies of typical engineering and science problems become the arena in which these analytical methods must be applied. A common spreadsheet program, such as Microsoft Excel, is the starting point to teach such topics as descriptive statistics, regression, interpolation, integration and solving sets of algebraic, differential and finite difference equations. Students are also introduced to programming fundamentals in the Visual Basic for Applications environment as they create the algorithms needed for the analysis. In this programming environment students gain an understanding of basic programming concepts, such as data types, assignment and conditional statements, logical and numerical functions, program flow control, passing parameters/returning values with functions and working with arrays. EAS 112 is a stop along the Multidisciplinary Engineering Foundation Spiral1 in the engineering programs at the University of New Haven. A typical student will take the course in the second semester of the first year. Certain engineering foundation topics will appear in the assigned problems and case studies, contributing to students’ understanding of areas such as electrical circuits, mass balances, and structural mechanics. At this point along the spiral curriculum students are given most of the equations needed to analyze the case study problems, but they are responsible for development of the algorithms and implementing these in the spreadsheet and/or programming environment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development and Verification of Three Matlab Analysis Applications Programmed Specifically for Engage Eamt Projects
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2003 The Development and Verification of Three Matlab Analysis Applications Programmed Specifically for Engage eamT Projects. Jonathan W. Huber University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Engineering Science and Materials Commons Recommended Citation Huber, Jonathan W., "The Development and Verification of Three Matlab Analysis Applications Programmed Specifically for Engage eamT Projects.. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2003. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2015 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Jonathan W. Huber entitled "The Development and Verification of Three Matlab Analysis Applications Programmed Specifically for Engage eamT Projects.." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Engineering Science. Christopher Pionke, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: J. Roger Parsons, Jaime Elaine Seat Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting the enclosed thesis written by Jonathan W.
    [Show full text]
  • 06 BCSI Booklet FINAL.Pdf
    IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION Guide to Good Practice for Handling, Installing, Restraining & Bracing of Metal Plate Connected Wood Trusses NOTICE WARNING CAUTION DANGER JOINTLY PRODUCED BY Structural Building Components Association 2006 EDITION UPDATED JUNE 2011 Building Component Safety Information WARNING CAUTION DANGER Use of the words above in any language should tell the reader that Prior to Truss installation, it is recommended that the documents an unsafe condition or action will greatly increase the probability be examined and disseminated to all appropriate personnel. In of an accident occurring that results in serious personal injury addition to proper training and a clear understanding of the in- or death. Disregarding or ignoring handling, installing, restraining stallation plan, any applicable fall protection requirements and the and bracing safety recommendations is the major cause of Struc- intended restraint/Bracing requirements shall be understood. tural Building Component erection/installation accidents. Examine the structure, including the framing system, bearing lo- The erection/installation of Structural Building Components is in- cations, and related installation locations and begin Truss installa- herently dangerous and requires, above all, careful planning and tion only after any unsatisfactory conditions have been corrected. communication between the Contractor involved with the erection/ Do not cut, modify, or repair components. Report any damage installation, installation crew and the crane operator. Depending on before installation. the experience of the Contractor, it is strongly recommended that a meeting be held with all onsite individuals involved in the lift- The information in this booklet is offered as a minimum guideline ing/hoisting, installing and temporary/permanent restraint/bracing only.
    [Show full text]
  • Solaris Performance and Tools -- Chapter 3 Processes
    solarispod.book Page 35 Thursday, June 22, 2006 11:58 AM 3 Processes Contributions from Denis Sheahan Monitoring process activity is a routine task during the administration of sys- tems. Fortunately, a large number of tools examine process details, most of which make use of procfs. Many of these tools are suitable for troubleshooting applica- tion problems and for analyzing performance. 3.1 Tools for Process Analysis Since there are so many tools for process analysis, it can be helpful to group them into general categories. Overall status tools. The prstat command immediately provides a by-pro- cess indication of CPU and memory consumption. prstat can also fetch microstate accounting details and by-thread details. The original command for listing process status is ps, the output of which can be customized. Control tools. Various commands, such as pkill, pstop, prun and preap, control the state of a process. These commands can be used to repair applica- tion issues, especially runaway processes. Introspection tools. Numerous commands, such as pstack, pmap, pfiles, and pargs inspect process details. pmap and pfiles examine the memory and file resources of a process; pstack can view the stack backtrace of a pro- cess and its threads, providing a glimpse of which functions are currently running. 35 solarispod.book Page 36 Thursday, June 22, 2006 11:58 AM 36 Chapter 3 Processes Lock activity examination tools. Excessive lock activity and contention can be identified with the plockstat command and DTrace. Tracing tools. Tracing system calls and function calls provides the best insight into process behavior. Solaris provides tools including truss, apptrace, and dtrace to trace processes.
    [Show full text]
  • RISA-3D Tutorials, General Reference Guide and Licensing Guide Can Be Found
    RISA-3D Tutorial – Version 19 RISA Tech, Inc. 26632 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 210 Foothill Ranch, California 92610 Phone: (949) 951-5815 Email: [email protected] risa.com Copyright © 2020, RISA Tech, Inc. All Rights Reserved. RISA is part of the Nemetschek Group . RISA, the RISA logo and RISA-3D are registered trademarks of RISA Tech, Inc. All other trademarks mentioned in this publication are the property of their respective owners. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of RISA Tech, Inc. Every effort has been made to make this publication as complete and accurate as possible, but no warranty of fitness is implied. The concepts, methods, and examples presented in this publication are for illustrative and educational purposes only and are not intended to be exhaustive or to apply to any particular engineering problem or design. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. RISA Tech, Inc. assumes no liability or responsibility to any person or company for direct or indirect damages resulting from the use of any information contained herein. Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................. i Online Help ........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Sample Pages
    Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and the publisher was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed with initial capital letters or in all capitals. The authors and publisher have taken care in the preparation of this book, but make no expressed or implied warranty of any kind and assume no responsibility for errors or omissions. No liability is assumed for incidental or consequential damages in connection with or arising out of the use of the information or programs contained herein. Sun Microsystems, Inc., has intellectual property rights relating to implementations of the technology described in this publication. In particular, and without limitation, these intellectual property rights may include one or more U.S. patents, foreign patents, or pending applications. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, J2ME, J2EE, Solaris, Java, Javadoc, Java Card, NetBeans, and all Sun and Java based trademarks and logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc., in the United States and other countries. UNIX is a registered trademark in the United States and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. THIS PUBLICATION IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. THIS PUBLICATION COULD INCLUDE TECHNICAL INACCURACIES OR TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS. CHANGES ARE PERIODICALLY ADDED TO THE INFORMATION HEREIN; THESE CHANGES WILL BE INCORPORATED IN NEW EDI- TIONS OF THE PUBLICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Smeared Constitutive Laws for Tensile Concrete to Predict the Cracking of RC Beams Under Torsion with Smeared Truss Model
    materials Article Evaluation of Smeared Constitutive Laws for Tensile Concrete to Predict the Cracking of RC Beams under Torsion with Smeared Truss Model Mafalda Teixeira and Luís Bernardo * Centre of Materials and Building Technologies (C-MADE), Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this study, the generalized softened variable angle truss-model (GSVATM) is used to predict the response of reinforced concrete (RC) beams under torsion at the early loading stages, namely the transition from the uncracked to the cracked stage. Being a 3-dimensional smeared truss model, the GSVATM must incorporate smeared constitutive laws for the materials, namely for the tensile concrete. Different smeared constitutive laws for tensile concrete can be found in the literature, which could lead to different predictions for the torsional response of RC beams at the earlier stages. Hence, the GSVATM is used to check several smeared constitutive laws for tensile concrete proposed in previous studies. The studied parameters are the cracking torque and the corresponding twist. The predictions of these parameters from the GSVATM are compared with the experimental results from several reported tests on RC beams under torsion. From the obtained results and the performed comparative analyses, one of the checked smeared constitutive laws for tensile concrete was found to lead to good predictions for the cracking torque of the RC beams regardless of the cross-section type (plain or hollow). Such a result could be useful to help with choosing the best constitutive laws to be Citation: Teixeira, M.; Bernardo, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Problem Solving and Troubleshooting in AIX 5L
    Front cover Problem Solving and Troubleshooting in AIX 5L Introduction of new problem solving tools and changes in AIX 5L Step by step troubleshooting in real environments Complete guide to the problem determination process HyunGoo Kim JaeYong An John Harrison Tony Abruzzesse KyeongWon Jeong ibm.com/redbooks International Technical Support Organization Problem Solving and Troubleshooting in AIX 5L January 2002 SG24-5496-01 Take Note! Before using this information and the product it supports, be sure to read the general information in “Special notices” on page 439. Second Edition (January 2002) This edition applies to IBM ^ pSeries and RS/6000 Systems for use with the AIX 5L Operating System Version 5.1 and is based on information available in August, 2001. Comments may be addressed to: IBM Corporation, International Technical Support Organization Dept. JN9B Building 003 Internal Zip 2834 11400 Burnet Road Austin, Texas 78758-3493 When you send information to IBM, you grant IBM a non-exclusive right to use or distribute the information in any way it believes appropriate without incurring any obligation to you. © Copyright International Business Machines Corporation 1999-2002. All rights reserved. Note to U.S Government Users – Documentation related to restricted rights – Use, duplication or disclosure is subject to restrictions set forth in GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corp. Contents Figures . xiii Tables . xv Preface . xvii The team that wrote this redbook. xvii Special notice . xix IBM trademarks . xix Comments welcome. xix Chapter 1. Problem determination introduction. 1 1.1 Problem determination process . 3 1.1.1 Defining the problem . 3 1.1.2 Gathering information from the user .
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkeye Screed 4-2020 Updateweb Hawkeye Screed 4
    The GOMACO Hawkeye Screed is designed for finishing a variety of projects including driveways, streets, ramps, or any flat slab. The truss system on the MV-18 model is manufactured out of high tensile tubular steel in an 18 in. (457 mm) equilateral triangle. This screed is built to last in concrete job-site conditions. The Worldwide Leader in Concrete Paving Technology HAWKEYE SCREED SPECIFICATIONS • Hawkeye screed model MV-18 is an engine-powered • The MV-18 can accommodate both winches at one screed that eliminates the need for an air compressor on end, allowing one man to move the screed forward. the job site. It is equipped with an 8.5 hp (6.3 kW) gasoline engine. • The MV-18 includes a 3/4 in. (19 mm) rustproof vibrator shaft with ball bearings on 30 in. (762 mm) • Truss sections for the MV-18 screed are available in 5 ft. centers. (1.52 m) and 7.5 ft. (2.29 m) lengths. All sections feature rigid stainless steel finishing screeds. • Eccentric weights clamp on the shaft. Heavier weights for finishing low-slump concrete are easily installed • Two 2500 lb. (1134 kg) capacity hand winches are without disassembly of the line shaft. included and 65 ft. (19.81 m) of 1/8 in. (3.2 mm) diameter aircraft cable with necessary pulleys and hooks. Optional • The standard width of the MV-18 screed is 11.5 ft. hydraulic powered or air-powered winches are available. (3.51 m) and weighs 312 lbs. (141.5 kg). The maximum frame width is 49 ft.
    [Show full text]
  • Programming Utilities Guide
    Programming Utilities Guide Sun Microsystems, Inc. 2550 Garcia Avenue Mountain View, CA 94043-1100 U.S.A. Part No: 802-5880 August 1997 Copyright 1997 Sun Microsystems, Inc. 901 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, California 94303-4900 U.S.A. All rights reserved. This product or document is protected by copyright and distributed under licenses restricting its use, copying, distribution, and decompilation. No part of this product or document may be reproduced in any form by any means without prior written authorization of Sun and its licensors, if any. Third-party software, including font technology, is copyrighted and licensed from Sun suppliers. Parts of the product may be derived from Berkeley BSD systems, licensed from the University of California. UNIX is a registered trademark in the U.S. and other countries, exclusively licensed through X/Open Company, Ltd. Sun, Sun Microsystems, the Sun logo, SunSoft, SunDocs, SunExpress, and Solaris are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. All SPARC trademarks are used under license and are trademarks or registered trademarks of SPARC International, Inc. in the U.S. and other countries. Products bearing SPARC trademarks are based upon an architecture developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. The OPEN LOOK and SunTM Graphical User Interface was developed by Sun Microsystems, Inc. for its users and licensees. Sun acknowledges the pioneering efforts of Xerox in researching and developing the concept of visual or graphical user interfaces for the computer industry. Sun holds a non-exclusive license from Xerox to the Xerox Graphical User Interface, which license also covers Sun’s licensees who implement OPEN LOOK GUIs and otherwise comply with Sun’s written license agreements.
    [Show full text]