DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 2019 OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 5 24 February 2020 Original: Spanish Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 2019 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SPECIAL RAPPORTEURSHIP ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS (SRESCER) Working for the indivisibility, interdependence and effective protection of all human rights for all people in America "Until dignity becomes the norm" Soledad García Muñoz Special Rapporteur on Economic, Social, Cultural and Environmental Rights Contents CHAPTER I: GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................................... 5 A. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 B. Main activities of the Special Rapporteur on ESCER ........................................................................ 7 1) Petitions and Cases System ......................................................................................................................... 8 2) Participation in IACHR sessions and public hearings ...................................................................... 8 3) Monitoring Activities ................................................................................................................................... 11 4) Mandate of Promotion and Technical Assistance Activities ........................................................ 12 5) San Salvador Protocol Working Group of the OAS .......................................................................... 27 6) Visits and business meetings .................................................................................................................... 27 7) Thematic reports, annual and expert knowledge production .................................................... 32 8) Pronouncements and special statements ............................................................................................ 32 9) Financing ........................................................................................................................................................... 34 10) Team ................................................................................................................................................................... 35 CHAPTER II: SITUATION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, CULTUAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE HEMISPHERE ................................................................................................................................................................ 37 INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 37 COUNTRY INFORMATION ........................................................................................................................................... 40 1) Antigua and Barbuda ................................................................................................................................... 40 2) Argentina .......................................................................................................................................................... 42 3) Bahamas ............................................................................................................................................................ 46 4) Barbados ........................................................................................................................................................... 49 5) Belize .................................................................................................................................................................. 50 6) Bolivia ................................................................................................................................................................. 52 7) Brazil ................................................................................................................................................................... 56 8) Canada ................................................................................................................................................................ 63 9) Chile .................................................................................................................................................................... 65 10) Colombia ........................................................................................................................................................... 71 11) Costa Rica .......................................................................................................................................................... 76 12) CUBA ................................................................................................................................................................... 82 13) DOMINICA ........................................................................................................................................................ 85 14) Ecuador .............................................................................................................................................................. 87 15) El Salvador ........................................................................................................................................................ 92 16) United States.................................................................................................................................................... 96 17) Grenada ............................................................................................................................................................. 98 18) Guatemala ...................................................................................................................................................... 101 19) Guyana ............................................................................................................................................................ 106 20) Haiti .................................................................................................................................................................. 109 21) Honduras........................................................................................................................................................ 110 22) Jamaica ............................................................................................................................................................ 113 23) Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................. 116 24) Nicaragua ....................................................................................................................................................... 125 25) Panama ........................................................................................................................................................... 134 26) Paraguay ......................................................................................................................................................... 139 27) Peru .................................................................................................................................................................. 144 28) Dominican Republic .................................................................................................................................. 149 29) Saint Kitts and Nevis ................................................................................................................................. 153 30) Saint Lucia ..................................................................................................................................................... 154 31) Saint Vincent and the Grenadines........................................................................................................ 156 33) Trinidad and Tobago ................................................................................................................................. 158 34) Uruguay .......................................................................................................................................................... 160 35) Venezuela ....................................................................................................................................................... 164 CHAPTER III: TENDENCIES ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS IN LIGHT OF THE 2019 REPORT OF THE REESCER ............................................................................................ 175 A. Social demonstrations and ESCER in Latin America.................................................................... 177 B. Economic, social, cultural and environmental rights .................................................................. 178 C. Environment and effects of climate change .................................................................................... 182 D. Business and Human Rights ................................................................................................................... 185 E. Human Mobility and ESCER in the Americas .................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Indigenous and Tribal People's Rights Over Their Ancestral Lands
    INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09 30 December 2009 Original: Spanish INDIGENOUS AND TRIBAL PEOPLES’ RIGHTS OVER THEIR ANCESTRAL LANDS AND NATURAL RESOURCES Norms and Jurisprudence of the Inter‐American Human Rights System 2010 Internet: http://www.cidh.org E‐mail: [email protected] OAS Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data Derechos de los pueblos indígenas y tribales sobre sus tierras ancestrales y recursos naturales: Normas y jurisprudencia del sistema interamericano de derechos humanos = Indigenous and tribal people’s rights over their ancestral lands and natural resources: Norms and jurisprudence of the Inter‐American human rights system / [Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights.] p. ; cm. (OEA documentos oficiales ; OEA/Ser.L)(OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978‐0‐8270‐5580‐3 1. Human rights‐‐America. 2. Indigenous peoples‐‐Civil rights‐‐America. 3. Indigenous peoples‐‐Land tenure‐‐America. 4. Indigenous peoples‐‐Legal status, laws, etc.‐‐America. 5. Natural resources‐‐Law and legislation‐‐America. I. Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. II Series. III. Series. OAS official records ; OEA/Ser.L. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.56/09 Document published thanks to the financial support of Denmark and Spain Positions herein expressed are those of the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights and do not reflect the views of Denmark or Spain Approved by the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights on December 30, 2009 INTER‐AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS MEMBERS Luz Patricia Mejía Guerrero Víctor E. Abramovich Felipe González Sir Clare Kamau Roberts Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro Florentín Meléndez Paolo G. Carozza ****** Executive Secretary: Santiago A.
    [Show full text]
  • Central America (Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua): Patterns of Human Rights Violations
    writenet is a network of researchers and writers on human rights, forced migration, ethnic and political conflict WRITENET writenet is the resource base of practical management (uk) independent analysis e-mail: [email protected] CENTRAL AMERICA (GUATEMALA, EL SALVADOR, HONDURAS, NICARAGUA): PATTERNS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS A Writenet Report by Beatriz Manz (University of California, Berkeley) commissioned by United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Status Determination and Protection Information Section (DIPS) August 2008 Caveat: Writenet papers are prepared mainly on the basis of publicly available information, analysis and comment. All sources are cited. The papers are not, and do not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. The views expressed in the paper are those of the author and are not necessarily those of Writenet or UNHCR. TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms ................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................ iii 1 Introduction........................................................................................1 1.1 Regional Historical Background ................................................................1 1.2 Regional Contemporary Background........................................................2 1.3 Contextualized Regional Gang Violence....................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Midterm Evaluation of Phase III of the Project Enhancing the Framework for the Development of a Heritage Economy in the Caribbean Report Final
    Midterm Evaluation of Phase III of the Project Enhancing the Framework for the Development of a Heritage Economy in the Caribbean Report Final Prepared for: Organization of American States Prepared by: Evan Green September 2019 Executive Summary This report presents the mid-term evaluation (MTE) of Phase III of the project “Enhancing the Framework for the Development of a Heritage Economy in the Caribbean” (EFDHEC). The MTE’s objectives are to (1) assess the progress and performance of Phase III of the Project and (2) determine to what extent the recommendations and lessons learned from the evaluation of Phase II were taken into account. The principle evaluation questions are based on four general criteria: relevance, efficiency, effectiveness and sustainability. Overall, the MTE concludes that Phase III of this project continue to completion. It is, however, strongly recommended that the Project be granted a 6-month no-cost extension to account for the 6-moth start-up delay and allow the Project to implement its planned timeline and that the OAS more closely and regularly monitor progress being made towards the existing targets and expected results. Summary conclusions related to each evaluation criterion are as follows: Relevance: The MTE confirms that the Project remains highly relevant for the Caribbean. Building on and integrating the lessons learned from previous phases, Phase III has further enhanced its relevance by focusing more at the community level and working more directly with governments. Effectiveness: The MTE found that overall progress made towards results is mixed for the Project. Given the early timing for MTE relative to the period of implementation, however, this was to be expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming Violence and Impunity: Human Rights Challenges in Honduras
    OVERCOMING VIOLENCE AND IMPUNITY: HUMAN RIGHTS CHALLENGES IN HONDURAS Report of the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development Dean Allison Chair Subcommittee on International Human Rights Scott Reid Chair MARCH 2015 41st PARLIAMENT, SECOND SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • The EU to the Rescue of the Cuban Economy
    The EU to the Rescue of the Cuban Economy? the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) and the State of Cuba-EU Economic Relations Larry Catá Backer (Pennsylvania State University) Rafael Velázquez Pérez (Universidade de Vigo y de Holguin) 1. Introduction. Despite an American embargo with various degrees of bite since the 1960s, European states have continued to do business with Cuba, and often served as that marginal additional source of trade especially when Cuba experienced substantial financial and political challenges. In 2017, even as the United States retreated from direct economic connections with Cuba, the European Union sought to step into the space left by the American action. That strategic initiative, the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) tooK final form accelerated in the wake of the prior U.S. Administration's policy of opening up. Negotiations for the Political Dialogue and Cooperation Agreement (PDCA) were launched in April 2014 and concluded on 11 March 2016. After the approval by the Council of the European Union, it was officially signed on 12 December 2016. In parallel, the agreement was submitted to the EU Member States' national parliaments and the Cuban National Assembly for ratification. The European Parliament gave its consent on 5 July 2017. Most parts of the agreement start to be provisionally applied as of 1 November 2017. (here) The Europeans view this as the marker of a new and more intensely profitable relationship with the Cuban state--though one not without its costs to Cuba. PDCA is the successor policy to the EU's Common Position which was repealed 12 December 2016 (repeal of the Common Position).
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Free Trade Zones Contributing to Decent Work? by Tina Renier Abstract
    Jamaican Development Strategies: Are the Free Trade Zones Contributing to Decent Work? By Tina Renier A Major Research Paper Submitted to Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in International Development Studies December, 2019, Halifax, Nova Scotia Copyright Tina Renier, 2019 …………………………………… Approved: Dr. Suzanne Dansereau Professor Date of Submission: December 18, 2019 0 Jamaican Development Strategies: Are the Free Trade Zones Contributing to Decent Work? By Tina Renier Abstract Many developing countries have used export processing zones as central development strategies to attract foreign direct investment and to create employment However, a serious problem associated with export processing zones is the fact that workers, mainly women, have been subjected to low wages, deplorable working conditions, limited or no social security protection and freedom of association is strictly prohibited. Jamaica serves as a unique case study because it is a small island developing state in the Caribbean that faces serious development challenges due its fragile economy, growing population and dependence on foreign powers for international aid. The primary objective of the current Andrew Holness-led Administration of Jamaica is to promote economic growth through job creation in the business product outsourcing sector. The 2016 Special Economic Zones Act was introduced with a revised special incentive package to investment and create high value-added jobs in a new regime of zones. By using content analysis of online newspaper articles, I will argue that because, Jamaica’s current EPZ development strategy is heavily focused on using special incentives to attract foreign direct investment, it does not contribute to decent work.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Factbook Central America and Caribbean
    The World Factbook Central America and Caribbean :: Honduras Introduction :: Honduras Background: Once part of Spain's vast empire in the New World, Honduras became an independent nation in 1821. After two and a half decades of mostly military rule, a freely elected civilian government came to power in 1982. During the 1980s, Honduras proved a haven for anti-Sandinista contras fighting the Marxist Nicaraguan Government and an ally to Salvadoran Government forces fighting leftist guerrillas. The country was devastated by Hurricane Mitch in 1998, which killed about 5,600 people and caused approximately $2 billion in damage. Since then, the economy has slowly rebounded. Geography :: Honduras Location: Central America, bordering the Caribbean Sea, between Guatemala and Nicaragua and bordering the Gulf of Fonseca (North Pacific Ocean), between El Salvador and Nicaragua Geographic coordinates: 15 00 N, 86 30 W Map references: Central America and the Caribbean Area: total: 112,090 sq km country comparison to the world: 103 land: 111,890 sq km water: 200 sq km Area - comparative: slightly larger than Tennessee Land boundaries: total: 1,520 km border countries: Guatemala 256 km, El Salvador 342 km, Nicaragua 922 km Coastline: Caribbean Sea 669 km; Gulf of Fonseca 163 km Maritime claims: territorial sea: 12 nm contiguous zone: 24 nm exclusive economic zone: 200 nm continental shelf: natural extension of territory or to 200 nm Climate: subtropical in lowlands, temperate in mountains Terrain: mostly mountains in interior, narrow coastal plains Elevation
    [Show full text]
  • Obligation of States to Adapt Their Domestic Legislation to the Inter-American Standards of Human Rights
    COMPENDIUM Obligation of States to Adapt Their Domestic Legislation to the Inter-American Standards of Human Rights OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 11 25 January 2021 Original: Spanish INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Compendium on the Obligation of States to Adapt Their Domestic Legislation to the Inter-American Standards of Human Rights 2021 iachr.org OAS Cataloging-in Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. Compendium on the Obligation of States to adapt their Domestic Legislation to the Inter-American Standards of Human Rights : approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on January 25, 2021. p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L/V/II) ISBN 978-0-8270-7187-2 1. Human rights. 2. Civil rights. I. Title. II. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.11/21 This document has been develop thanks to the support from the Pan American Development Foundation (PADF) in the framework of the “Regional Human Rights and Democracy Project”, and was made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this compendium are the sole responsibility of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and do not necessarily reflect the views of PADF, USAID or the United States Government. INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Members Joel Hernández García Antonia Urrejola Flávia Piovesan Esmeralda Arosemena Bernal de Troitiño Margarette May Macaulay Julissa Mantilla Falcón Edgar Stuardo Ralón Orellana Acting Executive Secretary María Claudia Pulido Chief of Staff of the Executive Secretariat of the IACHR Norma Colledani Assistant Executive Secretary for Monitoring, Promotion and Technical Cooperation María Claudia Pulido Assistant Executive Secretary for Cases and Petitions Marisol Blanchard Vera Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on January 25, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 9 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Marine
    MARiNe BIOdiveRsity BioNews 2019 - Content 2 3 4 5 6 ... Unexpected high number of endemics for the windward Dutch Caribbean Islands This article was published in BioNews 21 In light of the mounting impact of humans on discover just how rich the biodiversity of the Dutch Netherlands (Bos et al., 2018). The authors re- our planet, there is an urgent need to assess the Caribbean is. Each island has its own unique natu- viewed all literature available, including the 1997 Table 1: Breakdown of the 223 endemic species and subspecies status of all current living species so as to ensure ral history, its own special ecosystems and habi- biological inventories of Saba, St. Eustatius and according to larger taxonomic groupings (Bos et al., 2018) their long-term survival through adequate tats teeming with rare and exotic life. The remark- St. Maarten (Rojer, 1997abc) and the 2015 Beetles (Coleoptera) 33 conservation measures. Endemic species - de- able variety of terrestrial and marine habitats, Naturalis marine and terrestrial expedition to Gastropods 28 fined as “native and restricted to a certain place” including coral reefs, seagrass beds, mangroves, St. Eustatius which uncovered at least 80 new spe- (Merriam-Webster, 2018) - have an especially saliñas, rainforests, cactus and woodlands means cies for the island (Hoeksema & Schrieken, 2015). Spiders, scorpions and pseudoscorpions (Arachnida) 23 important ecological value due to their limited that the diversity of species is extraordinary. Birds 23 geographical range. Their increased vulnerabil- Recent biodiversity expeditions to the windward The checklist of endemic species put together by Grasshoppers, locusts and crickets (Orthoptera) 22 ity to natural and anthropogenic threats such as islands of the Dutch Caribbean (Saba, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Scoping Study Report Epidemiology of Chronic Kidney Disease in Nicaragua
    Final Scoping Study Report Epidemiology of Chronic Kidney Disease in Nicaragua Prepared for the CAO-Convened Dialogue Process on Chronic Renal Insufficiency Independent Report Prepared by Boston University School of Public Health Principal Investigator: Professor Daniel Brooks, DSc December 2009 Office of the Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman International Finance Corporation/ Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency www.cao-ombudsman.org Table of Contents Acronyms Used in Report…………………………………………………………….. 4 Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………… 6 I. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………... 30 II. CKD in Nicaragua: State of Knowledge………………………………………….. 34 A. CKD as a global health problem………………………………………….. 34 1. Characteristics of renal disease in Nicaragua …………………… 40 B. Data on CKD in Nicaragua………………………………………………… 41 1. Mortality Statistics…………………………………………………… 42 2. Prevalence of CKD………………………………………………….. 44 3. Interpretation of the data on CKD in Nicaragua………………….. 51 4. Summary of prior research on CKD in Nicaragua……………….. 58 III. Potential Causes of CKD in Nicaragua…………………………………………… 84 A. Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 84 B. Specific Hypotheses…………………………………………………………. 86 1. Agrichemicals…………………………………………………………. 86 2. Volume Depletion…………………………………………………….. 89 3. Muscle Damage………………………………………………………. 90 4. Systemic Infections………………………………………………….. 92 5. Heavy metals: Lead………………………………………………… 94 6. Heavy metals: Cadmium……………………………………………. 97 7. Heavy metals: Uranium……………………………………………… 98 8. Aristolochic Acid……………………………………………………… 100
    [Show full text]
  • FTTV14I3-5.Pdf
    "We are realists... we dream the impossible" - Che Fire This Time! Page 24 eland is Huma Hom nity Page 26 Artwork by: Gerardo Gomez Artwork by: It's best to be lifting up all parties at the same time. In the end everyone will José Martí be" up. Refusing to lift up one part is Cuban Revolutionary no way for lifting up the whole. Internationalist Homeland is humanity. CUBAN REVOLUTIONARY INTERNATIONALISM" IS SAVING LIVES AROUND THE WORLD FIGHTING COVID-19 Andorra Honduras Turin, Italy Barbados Gambia Venezuela Haiti Qatar Volume 14 Issue 3-5 • March-May 2020 • In English / En Español • Free • $3 at Bookstores www.firethistime.net Cuba’s Revolutionary Internationalism Lights a Path Forward for Humanity During the Global Covid-19 Pandemic By Tamara Hansen population-wise the U.S. is the 3rd largest ELAND IS HUMANI country in the world. How do President HOM TY May 19, 2020 marks 125 years since the Trump and Secretary Pompeo dare to accuse death in combat of Cuba’s national hero, Cuba of crimes when the wealthiest country #CUBASALVAVIDAS poet, writer, and anti-colonial revolutionary, in the world has left its own people to die? é í Jos Mart . At events in Cuba to mark this Humanity in the Face of a Global Pandemic anniversary, Cuban President, Miguel Díaz- Medical Brigades (HRIMB). Cuban medics Canel expressed that when Martí died, “in an On March 11, 2020, the World Health are famous for working free of charge with unfinished letter, he warns of the dangerous Organization (WHO) formally declared the their patients and for working in communities plans of the empire against Cuba and Our outbreak of Covid-19 a pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Mapping for All: a Generic Flood Risk Assessment Methodology for the Small Island Developing States
    Flood Risk Mapping for All: A Generic Flood Risk Assessment Methodology for the Small Island Developing States Hanne Glas Doctoral dissertation submitted to obtain the academic degree of Doctor of Engineering Technology Supervisors Prof. Greet Deruyter, PhD* - Prof. Em. Philippe De Maeyer, PhD** * Department of Civil Engineering Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University ** Department of Geography Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University May 2021 ISBN 978-94-6355-487-9 NUR 905 Wettelijk depot: D/2021/10.500/35 Members of the Examination Board Chair Prof. Em. Luc Taerwe, PhD, Ghent University Other members entitled to vote Prof. Luuk Boelens, PhD, Ghent University Prof. Renaat De Sutter, PhD, Ghent University Prof. Amaury Frankl, PhD, Ghent University Prof. Stefan Van Damme, PhD, Universiteit Antwerpen Katrien Van Eerdenbrugh, PhD, Witteveen+Bos Belgium Supervisors Prof. Greet Deruyter, PhD, Ghent University Prof. Em. Philippe De Maeyer, PhD, Ghent University WORD OF GRATITUDE As it has been more than a year now, working from home with little to no social contact, I cherish the amazing adventures and moments that have defined my PhD path even more. These moments could not have existed without the wonderful people that have guided me, professional as well as personal, these past seven years and helped me to get where I am today. There is no other person I could start this word of gratitude with than you, Greet. You were there from the very beginning, believing in me. You’ve been my biggest support, advising me and guiding me through these past seven years as true mentor. We’ve had some amazing experiences together, from working in the beautiful snowy landscape of Juuka to enjoying the sun at the Bulgarian seaside.
    [Show full text]