DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling Cognitive Response to Wireless Emergency Alerts to Inform Emergency Response Interventions Final Report March 2016 PNNL-25257

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling Cognitive Response to Wireless Emergency Alerts to Inform Emergency Response Interventions Final Report March 2016 PNNL-25257 Modeling Cognitive Response to Wireless Emergency Alerts to Inform Emergency Response Interventions Final Report March 2016 PNNL-25257 ii Courtney D. Corley [PI] Nathan O. Hodas Ryan Butner Joshua J. Harrison MODELING COGNITIVE Chris Berka [at ABM] RESPONSE TO WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS TO INFORM EMERGENCY RESPONSE INTERVENTIONS PNNL-25257 Prepared for U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, Support to the Homeland Security Enterprise and First Responders Group i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this report was provided to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, Homeland Security Enterprise and First Responders Group. For more information about this document, contact: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 902 Battelle Boulevard Richland, Washington 99354 Tel: 1-888-375-PNNL (7665) www.pnnl.gov Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 OVERVIEW OF PROJECT ................................................................................................................................. 10 1.2 BACKGROUND ON RISK COMMUNICATION ................................................................................................... 11 1.2.1 UNDERSTANDING RISK PERCEPTION AND COMMUNICATION .............................................................................. 11 1.2.2 RISK IDENTIFICATION ................................................................................................................................................. 11 1.2.3 COGNITIVE PROCESSING OF RISK PERCEPTION ...................................................................................................... 12 1.2.4 LINGUISTIC IMPLICATIONS ......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.3 BACKGROUND ON COGNITIVE PROCESSING OF RISK PERCEPTION ............................................................ 14 2.0 RISK COMMUNICATION AND PERCEPTION MESSAGES ............................................................... 17 2.1 EXEMPLAR DISASTER AND ALERT SELECTION............................................................................................. 17 2.2 HISTORICAL TWITTER DATA ACQUISITION ................................................................................................. 18 2.3 HISTORICAL QUERY DESIGN ......................................................................................................................... 18 2.4 EXEMPLAR TWEET SELECTION ..................................................................................................................... 18 3.0 DISENTANGLING THE LEXICONS OF DISASTER RESPONSE IN TWITTER .............................. 20 3.1 DATA ............................................................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 RISK CORPUS .................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.2.1 CLUSTERING.................................................................................................................................................................. 21 3.3 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 3.3.1 MOST INFORMATIVE AND SURPRISING TWEETS .................................................................................................... 24 3.3.2 DISCUSSION ON LEXICONS .......................................................................................................................................... 29 4.0 RISK COMMUNICATION AND PERCEPTION ONTOLOGY .............................................................. 30 4.1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.2 ONTOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................................... 30 4.2.1 STRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................................................... 32 4.2.2 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................................ 32 4.2.3 SUBUNITS ...................................................................................................................................................................... 36 4.2.4 SAMPLE ONTOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION ................................................................................................................ 37 5.0 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND SETUP ................................................................................................. 39 5.1 PARTICIPANT POPULATION AND SCREENING .............................................................................................. 39 5.2 CONSENT AND STUDY PROCEDURES ............................................................................................................. 40 5.3 ORIENTATION SESSION .................................................................................................................................. 40 5.4 BENCHMARK SESSION - ALERTNESS MEMORY PROFILER (AMP) ............................................................. 41 5.5 EXPERIMENTAL SESSION ............................................................................................................................... 41 5.6 END OF EXPERIMENTAL SESSIONS ................................................................................................................ 42 5.7 DATA ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................. 42 5.8 DESCRIPTION OF TESTBEDS .......................................................................................................................... 42 5.8.1 AMP ............................................................................................................................................................................... 42 5.8.2 EMERGENCY RESPONSE TESTBED ............................................................................................................................ 44 5.9 DESCRIPTION OF PROTOCOL DEVICES.......................................................................................................... 45 5.9.1 B-ALERT® EEG WIRELESS SENSOR HEADSET ................................................................................................... 45 5.9.2 GSR ARMBANDS .......................................................................................................................................................... 46 5.10 RISK/BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................................................... 47 5.10.1 FORESEEABLE RISKS ................................................................................................................................................. 47 5.10.2 RISK MANAGEMENT AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE .............................................................................................. 48 5.10.3 POTENTIAL BENEFITS .............................................................................................................................................. 48 5.10.4 COMPENSATION ......................................................................................................................................................... 48 5.10.5 WITHDRAWAL FROM THE PROTOCOL ................................................................................................................... 48 5.11 CONFIDENTIALITY ........................................................................................................................................ 49 5.12 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF MEDICAL MONITOR ............................................................................ 49 5.13 SURVEYS, QUESTIONNAIRES AND OTHER DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS ........................................ 50 5.14 EXPERIMENTAL SETUP ................................................................................................................................ 50 5.14.1 PERFORMANCE DATA ............................................................................................................................................... 52 5.14.2 PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA .............................................................................................................................................. 58 6.0 PRIMARY STUDY METHODOLOGY AND EXPERIMENT DESIGN ................................................ 65 6.1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 65 6.2 METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Developing a Tornado Emergency Plan for Schools in Michigan
    A GUIDE TO DEVELOPING A TORNADO EMERGENCY PLAN FOR SCHOOLS Also includes information for Instruction of Tornado Safety The Michigan Committee for Severe Weather Awareness March 1999 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS: A GUIDE TO DEVELOPING A TORNADO EMERGENCY PLAN FOR SCHOOLS IN MICHIGAN I. INTRODUCTION. A. Purpose of Guide. B. Who will Develop Your Plan? II. Understanding the Danger: Why an Emergency Plan is Needed. A. Tornadoes. B. Conclusions. III. Designing Your Plan. A. How to Receive Emergency Weather Information B. How will the School Administration Alert Teachers and Students to Take Action? C. Tornado and High Wind Safety Zones in Your School. D. When to Activate Your Plan and When it is Safe to Return to Normal Activities. E. When to Hold Departure of School Buses. F. School Bus Actions. G. Safety during Athletic Events H. Need for Periodic Drills and Tornado Safety Instruction. IV. Tornado Spotting. A. Some Basic Tornado Spotting Techniques. APPENDICES - Reference Materials. A. National Weather Service Products (What to listen for). B. Glossary of Weather Terms. C. General Tornado Safety. D. NWS Contacts and NOAA Weather Radio Coverage and Frequencies. E. State Emergency Management Contact for Michigan F. The Michigan Committee for Severe Weather Awareness Members G. Tornado Safety Checklist. H. Acknowledgments 2 I. INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of guide The purpose of this guide is to help school administrators and teachers design a tornado emergency plan for their school. While not every possible situation is covered by the guide, it will provide enough information to serve as a starting point and a general outline of actions to take.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Jayroe-Gamble She Overcame Her Fears and Shyness to Win Miss America 1967, Launching Her Career in Media and Government
    Jane Jayroe-Gamble She overcame her fears and shyness to win Miss America 1967, launching her career in media and government Chapter 01 – 0:52 Introduction Announcer: As millions of television viewers watch Jane Jayroe crowned Miss America in 1967, and as Bert Parks serenaded her, no one would have thought she was actually a very shy and reluctant winner. Nor would they know that the tears, which flowed, were more of fright than joy. She was nineteen when her whole life was changed in an instant. Jane went on to become a well-known broadcaster, author, and public official. She worked as an anchor in TV news in Oklahoma City and Dallas, Fort Worth. Oklahoma governor, Frank Keating, appointed her to serve as his Secretary of Tourism. But her story along the way was filled with ups and downs. Listen to Jane Jayroe talk about her struggle with shyness, depression, and a failed marriage. And how she overcame it all to lead a happy and successful life, on this oral history website, VoicesofOklahoma.com. Chapter 02 – 8:30 Grandparents John Erling: My name is John Erling. Today’s date is April 3, 2014. Jane, will you state your full name, your date of birth, and your present age. Jane Jayroe: Jane Anne Jayroe-Gamble. Birthday is October 30, 1946. And I have a hard time remembering my age. JE: Why is that? JJ: I don’t know. I have to call my son, he’s better with numbers. I think I’m sixty-seven. JE: Peggy Helmerich, you know from Tulsa? JJ: I know who she is.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparedness and Partnerships: Lessons Learned from the Missouri Disasters of 2011 a Focus on Joplin
    Preparedness and Partnerships: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE MISSOURI DISASTERS OF 2011 A Focus on Joplin Coordination Incident Command Documentation Communication ESS RES DN PO RE N A S P E E R P R E N C O O I V T E A R G I Y T I M x Preparedness and Partnerships: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE MISSOURI DISASTERS OF 2011 A Focus on Joplin TABLE OF CONTENTS E xecutive Summary _________________________________________________________ 2 The Missouri Hospital Association as a Response Organization ____________________ 8 Lessons Learned ___________________________________________________________ 10 Planning ______________________________________________________11 Communication _______________________________________________ 21 Resources and Assets __________________________________________ 24 Safety and Security ____________________________________________ 26 Staffing Responsibilities _________________________________________ 29 Staffing ________________________________________________ 29 Volunteers ______________________________________________ 31 Utilities Management __________________________________________ 32 Patient, Clinical and Support Activities ____________________________ 33 Medical Surge ___________________________________________ 33 References and Acknowledgements ___________________________________________ 36 Disclaimer: This report reflects information gathered from many hospital staff through surveys, interviews, presentations and individual and group discussions. The information relates individual and organization-specific identified
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Tornado and Severe Weather Awareness Drill
    2013 Tornado and Severe Weather Awareness Drill Scheduled for Thursday April 18, 2013 The 2013 Tornado Drill will consist of a mock tornado watch and a mock tornado warning for all of Wisconsin. This is a great opportunity for your school, business and community to practice your emergency plans. DRILL SCHEDULE: 1:00 p.m. – National Weather Service issues a mock tornado watch for all of Wisconsin (a watch means tornadoes are possible in your area. Remain alert for approaching storms). 1:45 p.m. - National Weather Service issues mock tornado warning for all of Wisconsin (a warning means a tornado has been sighted or indicated on weather radar. Move to a safe place immediately). 2:00 p.m. – End of mock tornado watch/warning drill The tornado drill will take place even if the sky is cloudy, dark and/or rainy. If actual severe storms are expected in the state on Thursday, April 18, the tornado drill will be postponed until Friday, April 19 with the same times. If severe storms are possible Friday, the drill will be cancelled. Information on the status of the drill will be posted at ReadyWisconsin.wi.gov. Most local and state radio, TV and cable stations will be participating in the drill. Television viewers and radio station listeners will hear a message at 1:45 p.m. indicating that “This is a test.” The mock tornado warning will last about one minute on radio and TV stations across Wisconsin and when the test is finished, stations will return to normal programming. In addition, alerts for both the mock tornado watch and warning will be issued over NOAA weather radios.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornado Preparedness Checklist
    Tornado Preparedness Checklist A tornado is one of nature’s most destructive storms. Unlike a hurricane or tropical storm, a tornado can develop with little warning, sometimes within minutes of the start of a thunderstorm, leaving little time to react. "e wind associated with a tornado can exceed 300 miles per hour, which can cause catastrophic damage. Every area in the United States has the potential of being impacted by a tornado. Tornadoes peak in the southern states from March to May, and from late spring to early summer in the northern states. "e importance of being prepared for a tornado cannot be overstated. "e following checklist can help you to prepare your business for the e#ects of a tornado. 9 BEFORE THE TORNADO Have a plan to provide emergency noti$cations (warning system) to all employees, clients, visitors and customers in the event of a tornado. Assign the responsibility of monitoring external weather conditions to several employees. Be sure to have adequate coverage for all hours of operation, including accommodations for when these individuals will be out of the o%ce. Determine multiple reliable sources (weather websites, weather blogs, etc.) and tools to monitor real-time weather conditions. Locate multiple locations that can be used for shelter by employees during a tornado. Typically, an interior room with concrete or masonry walls is the safest. Most local $re departments will assist companies in the identi$cation of suitable tornado shelters. Post tornado shelter and evacuation maps in common areas throughout your facility. Identify a separate and unique alarm tone/siren/announcement to notify employees and guests to proceed to the designated tornado shelter.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Kenner Emergency Operations Plan (COKEOP), Augmenting the Basic Plan (BP)
    CITY OF KENNER EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN Annex “A” HURRICANE AND STORM PLAN (H&SP) Issued: June 1, 2007 Revised: November 1, 2011 City of Kenner, Louisiana Hurricane and Storm Plan June 1, 2007 I. PURPOSE The purpose of the City of Kenner Hurricane & Storm Plan (hereafter referred to as “Plan” or “H&SP”) is to describe the emergency response of City agencies in the event of a hurricane or severe storm. This document is intended to serve as a guide for the delivery and coordination of governmental services prior to, during, and following a storm incident. The guidelines set forth will facilitate the City’s Emergency Planning Advisory Group (EPAG) and executive’s decision-making regarding preparation, response and management of storm incidents. II. SCOPE This Plan is an administrative directive governing the operations of the City of Kenner, its subordinate agencies and departments. This document in no way purports to cover all aspects of storm related disaster/emergency or recovery management. Rather, it is intended to provide City personnel with an outline of those essential functions and duties to be performed in the event of a hurricane or storm event. - 1 - Revised: November 1, 2011 City of Kenner, Louisiana Hurricane and Storm Plan June 1, 2007 TITLE I. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION III. HURRICANE AND STORM PLAN IMPLEMENTATION The City of Kenner Hurricane and Storm Plan (H&SP) is a component of the City of Kenner Emergency Operations Plan (COKEOP), augmenting the Basic Plan (BP). Upon learning or receiving information from any source of a developing, pending, or actual hurricane or storm event, the Mayor or his/her designee may implement all or any portion of the COKEOP-BP or H&SP.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Alters Theta-Nested Gamma Oscillations in Inferotemporal Cortex
    Learning alters theta-nested gamma oscillations in inferotemporal cortex Keith M Kendrick1, Yang Zhan1, Hanno Fischer1 Ali U Nicol1 Xuejuan Zhang 2 & Jianfeng Feng3 1Cognitive and Behavioural Neuroscience, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK 2Mathematics Department, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejian Province, PR China 3Department of Computer Science, Warwick University, Coventry CV4 7AL UK and Centre for Computational Systems Biology, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China. Corresponding authors: [email protected] [email protected] 1 How coupled brain rhythms influence cortical information processing to support learning is unresolved. Local field potential and neuronal activity recordings from 64- electrode arrays in sheep inferotemporal cortex showed that visual discrimination learning increased the amplitude of theta oscillations during stimulus presentation. Coupling between theta and gamma oscillations, the theta/gamma ratio and the regularity of theta phase were also increased, but not neuronal firing rates. A neural network model with fast and slow inhibitory interneurons was developed which generated theta nested gamma. By increasing N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor sensitivity similar learning-evoked changes could be produced. The model revealed that altered theta nested gamma could potentiate downstream neuron responses by temporal desynchronization of excitatory neuron output independent of changes in overall firing frequency. This learning-associated desynchronization was also exhibited by inferotemporal cortex neurons. Changes in theta nested gamma may therefore facilitate learning-associated potentiation by temporal modulation of neuronal firing. The functions of both low and high frequency oscillations in the brain have been the subject of considerable speculation1. Low frequency theta oscillations (4-8Hz) have been observed to increase in terms of power and phase-locked discharge of single neurons in a visual memory task2.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Regular Meeting, October 23, 2013
    MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA OCTOBER 23, 2013 MINUTES Page Regular Meeting held September 18, 2013 ............................................................................... 33874 CAMERON UNIVERSITY REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY ......................................................33867 Substantive Program Changes ......................................................................................33868 Fiscal Year 2012-2013 External Audits ........................................................................ 33869 Curriculum Changes .....................................................................................................33870 ROGERS STATE UNIVERSITY REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY ......................................................33870 Contracts and Grants ..................................................................................................... 33871 125 Plan Document Service Provider ........................................................................... 33872 Multi-Campus Videoconferencing System ...................................................................33873 Fiscal Year 2012-2013 External Audits ........................................................................33873 THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY ......................................................33874 HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER Professional Service Agreements ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AMBER Alert Best Practices
    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street NW. Washington, DC 20531 Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General Mary Lou Leary Acting Assistant Attorney General Melodee Hanes Acting Administrator Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Office of Justice Programs Innovation • Partnerships • Safer Neighborhoods www.ojp.usdoj.gov Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention www.ojjdp.gov The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance; the Bureau of Justice Statistics; the National Institute of Justice; the Office for Victims of Crime; and the Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking. AMBER Alert Best Practices ® May 2012 NCJ 232271 This document was prepared under cooperative agreement number 2008–MC–CX–K028 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of OJJDP or the U.S. Department of Justice. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Office of the Assistant Attorney General Washington, D.C. 20531 Message From Acting Assistant Attorney General Mary Lou Leary Few events can galvanize a community to action like the news that a child has been forcibly taken from his or her home or family. Fortunately, we have AMBER Alert, a program that helps commu­ nities coordinate their efforts to find, rescue, and return abducted children to their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Sleep Quality from EEG with Machine Learning Approaches
    Measuring Sleep Quality from EEG with Machine Learning Approaches Li-Li Wang, Wei-Long Zheng, Hai-Wei Ma, and Bao-Liang Lu∗ Center for Brain-like Computing and Machine Intelligence Department of Computer Science and Engineering Key Laboratory of Shanghai Education Commission for Intelligent Interaction and Cognitive Engineering Brain Science and Technology Research Center Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China Abstract—This study aims at measuring last-night sleep quality Index [2], Epworth Sleep Scale [3], and Sleep Diaries [4]. from electroencephalography (EEG). We design a sleep ex- However, we have no way of knowing whether the respondents periment to collect waking EEG signals from eight subjects are honest, conscientious, responsible for self assessment and under three different sleep conditions: 8 hours sleep, 6 hours sleep, and 4 hours sleep. We utilize three machine learning related records and in many cases they may provide false approaches, k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), support vector machine information or fill in the questionnaire not seriously. Secondly, (SVM), and discriminative graph regularized extreme learning the subjective evaluation method is more troublesome, time- machine (GELM), to classify extracted EEG features of power consuming and laborious, which requires participants to se- spectral density (PSD). The accuracies of these three classi- riously think about, a detailed answer, record relevant infor- fiers without feature selection are 36.68%, 48.28%, 62.16%, respectively. By using minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance mation in time, in the meantime, experiment personnel also (MRMR) algorithm and the brain topography, the classification need a manual investigation and analysis of the information accuracy of GELM with 9 features is improved largely and in order to give a sleep quality evaluation and judgment of increased to 83.57% in average.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Heartland Regional Emmy® Award Recipients
    2014 HEARTLAND REGIONAL EMMY® AWARD RECIPIENTS Morning Newscast - Larger Markets “7NEWS NOW: Snow Storm and Barricaded Man” KMGH, Denver Keely Walker, Producer Nicole Denne, Executive Producer Mitch Jelniker, Anchor Kelly Schuberth, Breaking News Producer Dana Hogan, Producer Bob Sandoval, Director Mike Nelson, Chief Meteorologist Tyler Lopez, Reporter Lindsay Sablan, Reporter Morning Newscast - Medium Markets “Good Morning Kansas: Tornado Touchdown” KAKE, Wichita Mike Iuen, Anchor Jemelle Holopirek, Anchor Jordan Shefte, Reporter Melisha Regier, Producer Daytime Newscast - Larger Markets “4 O'Clock on 9News Colorado Floods” KUSA, Denver Jennifer Marnowski, Producer Bob Pusatory, Director Linda Kotsaftis, Executive Producer Cody Crouch, Helicopter Photojournalist Matthew Fess, Pilot Daytime Newscast - Medium Markets “FOX23 News at Noon” KOKI, Tulsa Michelle Hodge, News Anchor Gregory DeBrosse, Managing Editor Evening Newscast - Larger Markets “Fox 31 Denver News at 9 - Front Range Floods” KDVR, Denver 1 Maureen Capasso, Executive Producer Brendan Wilkerson, News Producer Evening Newscast - Medium Markets “FOX23 News At 5” KOKI, Tulsa Suzanne Nadell, News Director Grace Orcutt, Executive Producer Brianna Collett, Producer Ron Terrell, News Anchor Evening Newscast - Smaller Markets “13 News at 6” WIBW-TV, Topeka Jon Janes, News Director Weekend Newscast - Larger Markets “A Community Stands Together” KUSA, Denver Liz Lambert, Producer Adam McPherson, Director Weekend Newscast - Medium Markets “FOX23 News Saturday” KOKI, Tulsa GregoryDeBrosse,
    [Show full text]
  • AMBER ALERT INTERNATIONAL, Pg. 8 FRONT LINES: Orange Park
    THE SUMMER ‘10 SUMMER AMBMISSINGER CHILDREN’S DAY EDITION VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2 - AUGUST 2010 AUGUST 4 ISSUE 2 - VOLUME MISSING CHILDREN’S DAY AROUND THE WORLD, pg. 3 FRONT LINES: Orange Park, Florida, pg. 6 AMBER ALERT INTERNATIONAL, pg. 8 WHAT’S IN THIS ISSUE OF THE A M B E R : MISSING CHILDREN’S DAY COMMEMORATED AROUND THE WORLD ................ PAGE 3 AMBER ALERT TRAINING HELPS SOLVE 1996 CHILD HOMICIDE CASE ................ PAGE 5 FRONT LINES: Orange Park, Florida ................ PAGE 6 PROFILE: BOB HOEVER ................ PAGE 7 AMBER ALERT INTERNATIONAL ................ PAGE 8 AMBER IN INDIAN COUNTRY ................ PAGE 9 ODDS & ENDS ................ PAGE 11 This publication was prepared under Cooperative Agreement number 2008-MC-CS-K028 from the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), U.S. Department of Justice. Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of OJJDP or the U.S. Department of Justice. Your story ideas and pictures are welcome. AMBER Alert INFO: For AMBER Alert Training & Technical Assistance, EDITOR: contact: Paul Murphy [email protected] Phil Keith, Program Director AMBER Alert Training & GRAPHIC LAYOUT: Technical Assistance Program Scott Troxel [email protected] 877-71-AMBER [email protected] Training & Class registration: www.amber-net.org 2 SUMMER 2010 | THE AMBER MISSING CHILDREN’S DAY MISSING CHILDREN’S DAY COMMEMORATED AROUND THE WORLD Efforts to find a child who vanished 3. Tombstone, Arizona postal em- more than 3 decades ago have ployees James Pantoja, Tony turned into an international event to Palma and Denultra Camp for remember all missing children.
    [Show full text]