• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Draft version March 22, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The influence of metallicity on the Leavitt Law from geometrical distances of Milky Way and Magellanic Clouds Cepheids Louise Breuval,1 Pierre Kervella,1 Piotr Wielgorski´ ,2 Wolfgang Gieren,3 Dariusz Graczyk,4 Boris Trahin,1 Grzegorz Pietrzynski´ ,2 Fred´ eric´ Arenou,5 Behnam Javanmardi,1 and Bart lomiejZgirski2 1LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, Universit´ePSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Universit´e,Universit´ede Paris, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France 2Nicolaus Copernicus Astronomical Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warszawa, Poland 3Universidad de Concepci´on,Departamento de Astronom´ıa,Casilla 160-C, Concepci´on,Chile 4Centrum Astronomiczne im. Mikolaja Kopernika, Polish Academy of Sciences, Rabia´nska8, 87-100, Toru´n,Poland 5GEPI, Observatoire de Paris, Universit´ePSL, CNRS, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France (Received 29 January 2021; Revised 12 March 2021; Accepted 18 March 2021) Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT The Cepheid Period-Luminosity (PL) relation is the key tool for measuring astronomical distances and for establishing the extragalactic distance scale. In particular, the local value of the Hubble constant (H0) strongly depends on Cepheid distance measurements. The recent Gaia Data Releases and other parallax measurements from the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) already enabled to improve the accuracy of the slope (α) and intercept (β) of the PL relation. However, the dependence of this law on metallicity is still largely debated. In this paper, we combine three samples of Cepheids in the Milky Way (MW), the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) in order to derive the metallicity term (hereafter γ) of the PL relation. The recent publication of extremely precise LMC and SMC distances based on late-type detached eclipsing binary systems (DEBs) provides a solid anchor for the Magellanic Clouds. In the MW, we adopt Cepheid parallaxes from the early third Gaia Data Release. We derive the metallicity effect in V , I, J, H, KS, WVI and WJK . In the KS band we report a metallicity effect of −0:221 ± 0:051 mag/dex, the negative sign meaning that more metal-rich Cepheids are intrinsically brighter than their more metal-poor counterparts of the same pulsation period. Keywords: parallaxes { stars: distances { stars: variables: Cepheids { distance scale { metallicity 1. INTRODUCTION (2020) assuming a Λ-CDM cosmology and the local es- The Cepheid Period-Luminosity (PL) relation, discov- timate based on Cepheid distances (Riess et al. 2021). ered by Henrietta Leavitt (Leavitt & Pickering 1912) The precise calibration of the PL relation is therefore of about a century ago, is an essential tool for measuring paramount importance to reach a 1% determination of the Hubble constant. arXiv:2103.10894v1 [astro-ph.GA] 19 Mar 2021 astronomical distances since it represents the first rung of the extragalactic distance ladder. This law is used to While the slope (α) and intercept (β) of the Leavitt measure distances to type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) host law are generally consistent between various studies, the galaxies, and thus plays a key role in the determination value and even the sign of the metallicity term (γ, de- fined as M = α log P + β + γ[Fe=H]) are still debated of the Hubble constant (H0). This parameter currently exhibits a tension of at least ∼ 4σ between its measure- and constitute 0:5% of the error budget of H0 (Riess ment in the early Universe by Planck Collaboration et al. et al. 2016). Some empirical studies report a metallic- ity dependence consistent with γ ∼ 0 mag=dex: Udal- ski et al.(2001) concludes with a null-effect from the [email protected] study of a metal-poor galaxy in optical bands, Storm et al.(2011a) finds a null effect in all bands except in 2 Breuval et al. WVI and Wielg´orskiet al.(2017) derive a gamma value et al.(2008), we consider that including this source of consistent with zero in optical and NIR bands. Still, a data does not impact the homogeneity and the disper- large majority of the analysis investigating the metal- sion of the data since it only affects four stars of the licity effect derived a negative sign, with values ranging sample. In the optical V and I bands, we use the cat- between −0:2 and −0:5 mag=dex (Freedman & Madore alog from Berdnikov(2008) that provides photometry 1990; Macri et al. 2006; Saha et al. 2006; Gieren et al. in the Johnson-Cousins system for a large number of 2018; Groenewegen 2018). This trend would indicate Cepheids. Since it is a compilation of data from various that metal-rich Cepheids are brighter than metal-poor catalogs by the same author, we adopt a photometric ones. However, the study by Romaniello et al.(2008) zero-point uncertainty of 0.010 mag. yielded a metallicity effect of the opposite sign, confirm- For each star and in each filter, we phase the data ing the theoretical predictions (Caputo et al. 2000; Bono at the date of maximum luminosity and we obtain et al. 2008; Fiorentino et al. 2013). intensity-averaged mean apparent magnitudes by per- In this paper, we aim at determining the effect of forming light curve fitting using Fourier series. Depend- metallicity on the PL relation by combining samples of ing on the properties of the different light curves (such Cepheids in the Milky Way (MW) and in the Magel- as the presence of bumps, steep variations, or to prevent lanic Clouds (MCs), taking advantage of the large range the introduction of unphysical oscillations when the data of metallicity covered by the Cepheids in these 3 galaxies are too dispersed or not dense enough), we adapt the (from +0:08 dex to −0:75 dex). Most of the Cepheids number of Fourier modes, and thus of free parameters, located in distant galaxies hosting SNIa have metallici- in order to obtain a satisfactory representation of the ties within this range, therefore our results are directly light curve. A Fourier decomposition of order three is applicable to extragalactic studies of the distance scale generally sufficient for an usual Cepheid light curve such (e.g. Javanmardi et al. 2021). as δ Cep, and is up to order six for a more complex star Recently, Pietrzy´nskiet al.(2019) and Graczyk et al. such as RS Pup. We derived the statistical uncertain- (2020) measured the most precise distances to date for ties on the mean magnitudes from the scatter of each the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and Small Mag- light curve. In some few cases, a very large number of ellanic Cloud (SMC) respectively, based on enhanced data points are available (> 300) and result in unreal- samples of late-type detached eclipsing binaries (DEBs). istic small errors: in these cases we adopt a minimum These distances allow us to obtain a precise calibration error of 0.006 mag. of the PL relation in the LMC and SMC. For Milky Way For long period Cepheids, large phase shifts may de- (MW) Cepheids, we use the early third Gaia Data Re- grade the quality of the fit, the photometry being spread lease (EDR3) which recently provided parallaxes of un- over four decades. Therefore, period changes were taken precedented precision for hundreds of galactic Cepheids. into account for the phasing of long period stars such as In Sect.2, we present our samples of Cepheids in the SV Vul, GY Sge or RS Pup (Kervella et al. 2017). We three galaxies and in Sect.3 we provide the distances we adopted a polynomial model of up to degree five for the adopted for each sample. Then in Sect.4 we estimate pulsation period. the metallicity effect by fitting the Period-Luminosity- We carefully analyse the light curves: we exclude Metallicity (PLZ) relation in the three galaxies. We Cepheids for which less than 8 data-points are available discuss the results in Sect.5. (MW Cepheids have on average 35 data points in NIR and 160 in optical) and Cepheids that have poor quality photometry or insufficient phase coverage. Finally, we 2. SAMPLES OF CEPHEIDS convert all the NIR data in the 2MASS system using 2.1. MW Cepheids the transformations from Monson & Pierce(2011). The systematics related to these transformations are negli- We gather a sample of Milky Way Cepheids for which gible. Examples of a well covered light curve and of a well-covered light curves are available. In the NIR J, H poor-quality light curve are provided in Fig.8 and9 in and K bands, we combine the catalogs by Welch et al. Appendix. (1984), Laney & Stobie(1992), Barnes et al.(1997) and We select Cepheids pulsating in the fundamental mode Monson & Pierce(2011). The data from these four stud- according to the reclassification by Ripepi et al.(2019). ies are found to be in close agreement, with residuals For stars that were not available in this catalog, we of 0.013, 0.010 and 0.002 mag in J, H and K respec- adopted by order of priority the pulsation modes from tively (Monson & Pierce 2011). We adopt these values Groenewegen(2018), from the Variable Star indeX as photometric zero-point uncertainties for the NIR pho- (VSX, Watson et al. 2006) and from Luck(2018). tometry. Additional NIR data were also found in Feast The influence of metallicity on the Leavitt Law 3 80 60.5 0.5 60 0.4 0.4 4 40 0.3 0.3 2 20 0.2 0.2 0 00.1 0.1 [Fe/H] [Fe/H] 20 0.0 0.0 2 40 0.1 0.1 4 Galactic Coordinates (kiloparsec) Galactic Latitude (Degree) 60 0.2 0.2 80 6 0.3 0.3 150 100 50 0 50 100 150 8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 Galactic Longitude (Degree) Galactic Coordinates (kiloparsec) Figure 1.

Load more

  26

Copy Link