DOCSLIB.ORG

Cost of Politics in Kyrgyzstan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cost of Politics in Kyrgyzstan COST OF POLITICS IN KYRGYZSTAN BACKGROUND PAPER Omurbek Ibraev C O N T E N T S Introduction 1 Methodology 1 I. Historical context 2 II. Current drivers of the cost of parliamentary politics 6 III. Outlook 11 I N T R O D U C T I O N This primary research on the cost of parliamentary politics was conducted by sampling current and former MPs, unsuccessful candidates for these positions and political party officers. It examined the financial implications of running for office in parliamentary elections in Kyrgyzstan which were held in October 2015. From this information, WFD will create a data set that can deepen the donor community’s understanding of electoral incentives and inform future programming aimed at improving democratic outcomes in the countries in which WFD works. The Kyrgyz Republic (hereafter “Kyrgyzstan”) is the sole democracy to emerge in the Central Asian post-Soviet states. While the country has experienced two revolutions in the past 10 years, it has developed into the only stable parliamentary system in the region. The country has seen a dramatic increase in the cost of politics within the last decade that threatens to undermine this fledgling democracy. M E T H O D O L O G Y In the framework for this study, two methods of analysis were mainly used: desk-based review and situational analysis. The desk-based research focused on the drivers of the cost of politics in Kyrgyzstan. It included a legal analysis of current legislation governing election procedures. It also examined the core issues contributing to the rising cost of politics in Kyrgyzstan. The situational analysis examined the current realities regarding the increased influence of money in politics by conducting semi-structured interviews (survey) of MPs, political parties’ election campaign staff and leading local experts in the field. The research examined these principal questions: 1. What is the historical experience of campaign financing and how has this shaped previous elections at the parliamentary level? 2. What are the key drivers of electoral costs for current parliamentary elections? What does it roughly cost to run for parliament? What are the principal sources of funding for parliamentary campaigns? Is the burden to fund campaigns principally on the candidate or the political party? 3. What are the costs incurred by MPs once in office? Are these demands principally public (official engagements) or private (constituent requests)? 4. What barriers do these costs create for particular groups (such as women)? 5. What are the prospects for future expansion or reduction of these costs based on either normative or legal constraints? The survey covered current and former MPs of the Kyrgyz Parliament, as well as other participants in local council elections that were conducted in March 2016.The total number of surveyed participants was about 40 people. 1 The political system their list from each gender and every fourth Since gaining independence from the Soviet candidate on the list from a different gender. Union in 1991, Kyrgyzstan has attempted There was also as well a 15-per-cent quota with mixed results to construct a functioning on each list for ethnic minority candidates. parliamentary system. The country’s first Controversially, following claims of vote rigging elections in October 1991 returned Askar at the previous election, biometrics were Akayev unopposed and it initially appeared introduced. A number of parties combined as though he was committed to economic their financial resources and sought to ensure and political reform. However, allegations of their ability to exceed the seven-per-cent corruption and vote-rigging soon bubbled to threshold to be allocated seats. These parties the surface and by 2005 Akayev was still in largely represented northern and southern post in spite of a promise to stand down when constituencies respectively. Controversy also his term expired. circulated around the formation of party lists with allegations that places were sold to the This led to protests and Akayev’s eventual highest bidder – rumours suggest that high downfall in what became known as the Tulip places on the lists cost between US$500,000 Revolution. He was replaced by Opposition and US$1 million. Leader Kurmanbek Bakiyev after a landslide victory in which he too promised significant Six parties won seats in parliament. The Social political reform. When this reform failed to Democratic Party of Kyrgyzstan (SDPK), a be delivered, a second revolution followed in party identified with President Almazbek 2010 which led to ethnic violence, particularly Atambayev, led the pack. Other parties with between Kyrgyz and Uzbeks in the south of seats were: the opposition Respublika-Ata the country. Jurt; the pro-government Kyrgyzstan party; the southern-focused Onuguu-Progress; Bir Bol, a That revolution, which broadly sets the patchwork party formed by veteran officials tone for Kyrgyz politics today, resulted in a from earlier presidential administrations; and referendum which reduced presidential power the left-of-centre Ata Meken party, a long-time and proposed a new constitution that made fixture on the Kyrgyz political scene. Three Kyrgyzstan a parliamentary democracy with of the six (Onuguu Progress, Bir Bol and a 120-seat parliament which no one party Kyrgyzstan) were formed less than one year could dominate. Parties based on ethnicity or before the 2015 elections. As parties are able religion were banned. to gain power with no clear policy platform and there is little public demand for this, there Kyrgyzstan is a semi-parliamentary system is little incentive to reform. with a directly elected president and a prime minister elected by parliament. In the last The political party system in the Kyrgyz election, 14 parties submitted candidate lists Republic is fragmented, with the Ministry of and paid the required fee of KGS5 million Justice officially registering 203 political parties, (Kyrgyz soms) (about US$74,000) in order which in Kyrgyzstan are formed around the to participate in the election. The fee was personalities of their leaders and not by increased fivefold from previous elections and platforms, which largely coincide. However, the is criticized by some as being an obstacle to ministry of justice has no authority or capacity exclude smaller parties. to control the implementation of financial Parliamentary elections took place on 4 transparency by political parties. October 2015. Parties were required to have at least 30 per cent of the candidates on In Kyrgyzstan, political parties are based 2 around the personality of a leader rather particular seem to feed the division of power: than a long-term identity based on policies. social and political fragmentation and the During the survey, most respondents stated interests of predatory political and business that parties lacked the skills and experience elites. to debate policy positions and unite voters around their ideas. One kind of fragmentation is evident through the strong ties that exist between particular The big-man syndrome political leaders and their local constituencies. Currently, the most common motivations As political scientist Scott Radnitz argued for the appearance of political parties and to explain the 2005 Tulip Revolution, under projects in the Kyrgyz Republic are continuity conditions of weak state capacity, political and lobbying. Most parties are headed by and business elites maintain close client-type former or current high-ranking officials. Parties relationships with particular localities (often lobby and support the interests of certain their hometowns as well as their electoral social structures and groups at all levels. For districts), eroding the authority of formal example, each financial group or clan reaching state institutions. While some specifics of that a certain level of development considers it 2005 situation no longer apply, such as the necessary to have a party that will lobby for its majoritarian system of electing parliamentary interests in the power structure. deputies, political elite connections to particular localities remain salient. As the Political parties are often no more than a 2010 and 2015 elections demonstrate, Kyrgyz temporary collection of interests, driven parties continue to rely on particular party by individuals with generic platforms and members’ work at the local level to mobilize little contact with their electorate. This is votes. Another dimension of Kyrgyzstan’s exacerbated by the closed list electoral political fragmentation is regional. While system, which does not naturally lend itself generally considered highly sensitive and to fostering strong links between MPs and politicized, regional differences in voting constituencies. Parties remain focused behavior provide interesting data. Those around individuals, and many party leaders parties led by politicians from the southern are successful businessmen seeking office to regions received fewer votes in the northern obtain immunity and government influence. regions, and vice versa. This may indicate an MPs continue to buy their way on to party urban-rural divide and/or a degree of ethnic lists with widespread reports and evidence of homogeneity within populations. this practice. The second factor that feeds the division of Political parties are often inactive between power into multiple centers is the nature of elections and poorly connected to the factions the current political elite. The post-Soviet in parliament. political elite in Kyrgyzstan developed into a large predatory group that views the state The fragmentation of politics primarily as a tool for private enrichment. The The eradication of a strong presidency and efforts of both former presidents Akaev and the monopoly of a single group over political Bakiev to create single pro-presidential parties power thus appear to have been achieved. left important and powerful actors outside However, given the twists in the political the “state” system, leading to the March 2005 system of Kyrgyzstan over the past 20 years, and April 2010 events. The current multiparty one wonders how sustainable the current parliament and coalition government, in this political system really is.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elections and Identity Politics in Kyrgyzstan 1989-2009 - Moving Beyond the ‘Clan Politics’ Hypothesis
    LSE ELECTIONS AND IDENTITY POLITICS IN KYRGYZSTAN 1989-2009 - MOVING BEYOND THE ‘CLAN POLITICS’ HYPOTHESIS Fredrik M Sjoberg Thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science London July 2009 Final version: 01/12/2009 11:49 UMI Number: U615307 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615307 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. Fredrik M Sjoberg 2 Abstract This dissertation examines the emergence of political pluralism in the unlikely case of Kyrgyzstan.
    [Show full text]
  • IFES Faqs Elections in Kyrgyzstan: 2021 Early Presidential Election
    Elections in Kyrgyzstan 2021 Early Presidential Election Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Eurasia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 2011 Crystal Drive | Floor 10 | Arlington, VA 22202 | USA | www.IFES.org January 8, 2021 Frequently Asked Questions When is Election Day? ................................................................................................................................... 1 What is the current political context, and what is at stake in these elections? ........................................... 1 What is the current form of government? ................................................................................................... 2 What is the term of the office of the president, and what is the president’s role? ..................................... 2 Who are the candidates? .............................................................................................................................. 2 Who is eligible to run as a candidate? .......................................................................................................... 3 What are the nomination and registration procedures for presidential candidates? ................................. 3 What is the campaign and electoral timeline? ............................................................................................. 4 Who is eligible to vote, and how many voters are registered to vote? ........................................................ 4 What are the campaign expenditure and donation limits? .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION to the PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS in KYRGYZSTAN (4 October 2015) Report by Ryszard Czarnecki, Chair
    ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN KYRGYZSTAN (4 October 2015) Report by Ryszard Czarnecki, Chair of the Delegation Annexes: A. Final programme (including list of participants) B. Statement of the Chair of the EP Delegation at the press conference C. IEOM Joint Press Statement D. IEOM Preliminary Findings and Conclusions Introduction Following an invitation sent by the President of the Parliament of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament authorised, on 10 September 2015, the sending of an Election Observation Delegation to observe the parliamentary elections in Kyrgyzstan scheduled for 4 October 2015. The European Parliament Election Observation Delegation was composed of six Members: Mr Ryszard Czarnecki (ECR, Poland), Mr Joachim Zeller (EPP, Germany), Mr Juan Fernando Lopez Aguilar (S&D, Spain), Ms Marietje Schaake (ALDE, Netherlands), Ms Tatjana Zdanoka (Greens/EFA, Latvia) and Mr Ignazio Corrao (EFDD, Italy). Mr Ryszard Czarnecki was elected Chair of the Delegation at the constituent meeting on 22 September 2015. The European Parliament Delegation performed the election observation in accordance with the Declaration of Principles of International Election Observation and the Code of Conduct for international election observers. It followed the OSCE/ODIHR's methodology in the evaluation procedure and assessed the election for its compliance with OSCE commitments for democratic elections. Members of the EP Delegation signed the Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament Election Observation Delegations, in conformity with the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 13 September 2012. Programme As is usual in the OSCE area, the Delegation was integrated within the framework of the OSCE/ODIHR election observation mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan: Closer to Democracy — and Russia
    At a glance October 2015 Kyrgyzstan: Closer to democracy — and Russia Praised by both Russian and European observers, the elections of 4 October 2015 are considered a milestone in Kyrgyzstan's democratic transition of the country, consolidating the new political system launched by the new constitution adopted after the 2010 revolution. With seats split between six pro-Moscow parties, the results entail the formation of a coalition government in the fractured parliament, and herald further rapprochement to Russia. Background: transition to parliamentary democracy Once regarded as an 'island of democracy' in Central Asia, Kyrgyzstan has a turbulent political history. The first president of independent Kyrgyzstan, Askar Akayev, was toppled in political unrest, known as the Tulip Revolution, in April 2005. The European Parliament (EP) resolution of 12 May 2005 called on Kyrgyz authorities to begin a genuine democratisation process, welcoming the launch of an inclusive process of constitutional reform aiming to ensure fundamental change. Hopes for a democratic transition soon faded with President Kurmanbek Bakiyev's increasingly authoritarian rule, as noted in a May 2006 EP resolution. Bakiyev's ousting in April 2010, known as the 'second tulip revolution', presented a window of opportunity for democratisation. A new constitution, adopted after the referendum in June 2010, transformed Kyrgyzstan from an authoritarian presidential system to a relatively democratic semi-presidential one, combining elements of parliamentary and presidential systems in addition to checks-and-balances mechanisms. As the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) acknowledges, progress towards consolidation continued with the legislative elections of October 2010. The presidential elections of October 2011 thus constituted the final step in the post-Bakiyev transition process.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Peace and Conflict in the East and the West
    Anja Mihr Editor Between Peace and Conflict in the East and the West Studies on Transformation and Development in the OSCE Region Between Peace and Conflict in the East and the West Anja Mihr Editor Between Peace and Conflict in the East and the West Studies on Transformation and Development in the OSCE Region Editor Anja Mihr OSCE Academy in Bishkek Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan ISBN 978-3-030-77488-2 ISBN 978-3-030-77489-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77489-9 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2021. This book is an open access publication. Open Access This book is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribu- tion and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this book are included in the book’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the book’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests
    Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests Jim Nichol Specialist in Russian and Eurasian Affairs August 30, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov 97-690 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Kyrgyzstan: Recent Developments and U.S. Interests Summary Kyrgyzstan is a small and poor Central Asian country that gained independence in 1991 with the breakup of the Soviet Union. The United States has been interested in helping Kyrgyzstan to enhance its sovereignty and territorial integrity, bolster economic reform and development, strengthen human rights, prevent weapons proliferation, and more effectively combat transnational terrorism and trafficking in persons and narcotics. Special attention long has been placed on bolstering civil society and democratization in what has appeared to be the most receptive—but still challenging—political and social environment in Central Asia. The significance of Kyrgyzstan to the United States increased after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States. Kyrgyzstan offered to host U.S. forces at an airbase at the Manas international airport outside of the capital, Bishkek, and it opened in December 2001. The U.S. military repaired and later upgraded the air field for aerial refueling, airlift and airdrop, medical evacuation, and support for U.S. and coalition personnel and cargo transiting in and out of Afghanistan. The Kyrgyz government threatened to close down the airbase in early 2009, but renewed the lease on the airbase (renamed the Manas Transit Center) in June 2009 after the United States agreed to higher lease and other payments. President Almazbek Atambayev and the legislature have stated that the basing agreement will not be renewed when it expires in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Women, the Parliament and Political Participation in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan
    Women, the Parliament and Political Participation in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan Accepted version of an article published in Central Asian Affairs: Turdalieva, Cholpon, and Medet Tiulegenov. " Women, the Parliament and Political Participation in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan", Central Asian Affairs 5, 2 (2018): 134-159. Cholpon Turdalieva American University of Central Asia, Humboldt University [email protected] Medet Tiulegenov American University of Central Asia [email protected] Abstract This paper explores women’s participation in parliamentary elections in post- Soviet Kyrgyzstan. Using various methods, it offers an interdisciplinary perspective on factors that affect the likelihood of women participating successfully in parliamentary elections. This study supports the general literature on the effects of gender quotas and proportional representation, but its results on other factors are mixed. The factor of financial resources is significant, though its impact has been reduced with the introduction of gender quotas, while other factors—such as social status—may not be particularly important. The public perception of a woman in politics is not the greatest obstacle to women’s representation, and a female candidate’s professional status may often be attractive to party leaders. Keywords women – electoral politics – parliament – post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan – political participation Introduction Women’s participation in elections is the norm worldwide. Even Saudi Arabia, one of the last countries to allow women to stand for public office, agreed in doi 10.1163/22142290-00502003 Women, the Parliament and Political Participation 2 2015 that women could be elected to local councils. Yet despite considerable advances in formal electoral rights, there remain obstacles to the exercise of these rights throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • BA Country Report of Kyrgyzstan Part 1 Macro Level
    Informal Governance and Corruption – Transcending the Principal Agent and Collective Action Paradigms Kyrgyzstan Country Report Part 1 Macro Level Aksana Ismailbekova | July 2018 Basel Institute on Governance Steinenring 60 | 4051 Basel, Switzerland | +41 61 205 55 11 [email protected] | www.baselgovernance.org BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE This research has been funded by the UK government's Department for International Development (DFID) and the British Academy through the British Academy/DFID Anti-Corruption Evidence Programme. However, the views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the British Academy or DFID. Dr Aksana Ismailbekova, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Advokatenweg 36 06114 Halle (Saale), Germany, [email protected] 1 BASEL INSTITUTE ON GOVERNANCE Table of contents Abstract 3 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Informal Governance and Corruption: Rationale and project background 4 1.2 Informal governance in Kyrgyzstan 4 1.3 Conceptual approach 6 1.4 Research design and methods 6 2 Informal governance and the lineage associations: 1991–2005 7 2.1 Askar Akaev and the transition to Post-Soviet governance regime 7 2.2 Co-optation: Political family networks 8 2.3 Control: social sanctions, demonstrative punishment and selective law enforcement 11 2.4 Camouflage: the illusion of inclusive democracy and charitable contributions 13 2.5 The Tulip Revolution and the collapse of the Akaev networks 13 3 Epoch of Bakiev from 2005–2010 14 3.1 Network re-accommodation in the aftermath of the Tulip Revolution
    [Show full text]
  • "The Transformation of Askar Akaev, President of Kyrgyzstan" by R
    University of California, Berkeley The Transformation of Askar Akaev, President of Kyrgyzstan Regine A. Spector Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPS’s mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ The Transformation of Askar Akaev, President of Kyrgyzstan Regine A. Spector Spring 2004 Regine A. Spector is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley. She would like to thank the following people for their comments and suggestions on previous drafts: George W.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Asia: the Space of 'Silk Democracy'. Political
    CENTRAL ASIA: THE SPACE OF ‘SILK DEMOCRACY’. POLITICAL PARTIES ALMATY 2016 UDC 329 LBC 66. 6 C 38 Authors: Tamerlan Ibraimov, PhD in Juridical Sciences (Editor) Sanat Kushkumbayev, Doctor of Political Science Farkhod Tolipov, PhD in Political Science Abdugani Mamadazimov, PhD in Political Science, Senior Lecturer Tolganai Umbetaliyeva , PhD in Political Science Elmira Nogoybayeva, Political Analyst Tatyana Panchenko - Proof-reader C 38 Central Asia: The ‘Silk Democracy’ Region. Political Parties. Edited by Cand.Sc. Law T. Ibraimov. Almaty, 2016 - 44 p. ISBN 978-601-80184-9-7 This third piece of work by the Almaty-Club group of experts starts a cycle devoted to an examination of the contemporary political development of each of the countries of the Central Asian region. For the purpose of outlining the characteristics of the democratic processes in Central Asia, the authors use the term ‘silk democracy’ and provide an explanation of this term. This work looks at the features of the party systems of the countries of Central Asia, their historical and cultural characteristics, legislative provisions, and the political realities associated with the parties and simultaneously influencing the level of their development. The work is intended for political analysts, lawyers, historians, and also the wide range of readers with an interest in matters concerning the development of the political parties and democratic processes in Central Asia as a whole. UDC 329 LBC 66. 6 ISBN 978-601-80184-9-7 © The Friedrich Ebert Fund, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER I. A Challenge to Democracy: from De-partization to Re-partization...............................6 CHAPTER II.
    [Show full text]
  • Elections in the Kyrgyz Republic 2015 Parliamentary Elections
    Elections in the Kyrgyz Republic 2015 Parliamentary Elections Frequently Asked Questions Europe and Asia International Foundation for Electoral Systems 1850 K Street, NW | Fifth Floor | Washington, DC 20006 | www.IFES.org September 28, 2015 Frequently Asked Questions Why are these elections so important? What is the political context? ........................................................ 1 Who are citizens voting for on Election Day? ............................................................................................... 1 What are the major parties running for election? ........................................................................................ 1 Who can run for a seat in Parliament? ......................................................................................................... 2 Who is eligible to vote?................................................................................................................................. 3 How is the voter register compiled and what changes have occurred in the electoral system? ................. 3 How many polling places are there on Election Day? .................................................................................. 4 Is out-of-country voting allowed? ................................................................................................................. 4 What is the structure and role of the election management body? ............................................................ 4 Who can observe during Election Day? How can they get accreditation?
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology of Gender Rating of Political Parties of Kyrgyzstan
    Мыйзамдуулук Демилгелер Аялдардын Альянсы GRP AUGUST GENDER RATING OF POLITICAL PARTIES OF KYRGYZSTAN FIRST EDITION- AUGUST 2015 Bishkek, 2015 УДК 323/324 ББК 66.3 (2 Ки) 3 Gender rating of political parties of Kyrgyzstan. First release – August 2015 – B., 2015. - 60 p. ISBN 978-9967-27-901-8 Under the guidance of: Kochorbaeva Zulfia Authors: Kochorbaeva Zulfia Beknazarova Munara Islanbekova Baktygul Hadjimuratova Natalia Haldarova Sevara Sociological survey: Center of Public Opinion Study and Forecasting “EL-PIKIR+» Gender rating of political parties of Kyrgyzstan was initiated and is implemented by PA “Agency of social technologies” within the framework of UNDP, UNCEF “Women as Peaceful voters and Women as Candidates” project with support of the United Nations Peacebuilding Fund. Materials and results of the Gender rating of political parties do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations and the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. УДК 323/324 ББК 66.3 (2 Ки) 3 Г 0803010411-15 ISBN 978-9967-27-901-8 © UNDP in the Kyrgyz Republic, 2015 © PA «Agency of social technologies”, 2015 Table of contents INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................................6 RESULTS OF GENDER RATING OF POLITICAL PARTIES FOR AUGUST 2015........................................................................7 Diagram 1. Consolidated gender rating of political parties of Kyrgyzstan for August 2015. ...........................................9
    [Show full text]