United States Patent and Trademark Office Before

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

United States Patent and Trademark Office Before UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P. Petitioner v. GENERAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LTD. Patent Owner Inter Partes Review Case No. 2017-01889 U.S. Patent No. 7,230,931 PETITIONER’S UPDATED MANDATORY DISCLOSURES Petitioner previously identified Sprint Spectrum L.P., Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., Boost Mobile, LLC, Clearwire Corporation, Clearwire Communications LLC, Clear Wireless LLC, and Sprint Corporation as real parties-in-interest. As a result of a series of corporate transactions, Petitioner hereby updates its real party-in- interest information for purposes of the remaining proceedings in this IPR on remand from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, as shown below. Pursuant to this update, Petitioner identifies the following additional real parties-in-interest in addition to those previously identified: Assurance Wireless 1 84815668.1 USA, L.P., SprintCom, Inc., Sprint Communications, Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., T- Mobile USA, Inc., and DISH Network Corporation. Previously identified Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. underwent a name change effective February 18, 2020 to change its name to Assurance Wireless USA, L.P. Effective in February 2020, Virgin Mobile brand subscribers were transferred to the Boost Mobile brand. Previously identified Boost Mobile LLC was dissolved in 2016 and its former subscribers were serviced by SprintCom, Inc. until on or about July 1, 2020. On June 11, 2020, SprintCom, Inc., and Assurance Wireless USA, L.P., were substituted as parties to the underlying infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas, now re-captioned under Case No. 2:20-cv-00007-RWS (E.D. Tex.), in place of Boost Mobile, LLC, and Virgin Mobile USA, L.P., respectively. As a result of a merger on April 1, 2020, Sprint Corporation is a wholly- owned subsidiary of T-Mobile USA, Inc. T-Mobile USA, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of T-Mobile US, Inc. Effective May 8, 2020, previously identified Clearwire Corporation was merged into Sprint Communications, Inc. Effective July 1, 2020, pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement between T- Mobile US, Inc., Sprint Corporation, and DISH Network Corporation, the Boost Mobile brand was acquired by DISH Network Corporation. Subscribers of the Boost Mobile brand, including former subscribers of the Virgin Mobile brand, are -2- 84815668.1 now subscribers of DISH Network Corporation, with their devices operating on the networks of Sprint Spectrum L.P. and/or T-Mobile USA, Inc. Petitioner’s identification of Sprint Corporation, T-Mobile US, Inc., T- Mobile USA, Inc., and DISH Network Corporation as real parties in interest for purposes of this proceeding only is out of an abundance of caution and only to the extent that Patent Owner contends that these separate legal entities should be named as real parties in interest in this IPR. Sprint Corporation, T-Mobile US, Inc., and T-Mobile USA, Inc. are legally and factually distinct entities from their subsidiaries. Each of T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s subsidiaries, including Sprint Spectrum L.P., maintains its own independent status, identity, and structure. Dated: July 8, 2020 Respectfully submitted, By: /Robert C. Hilton________ Robert C. Hilton Reg. No. 47,649 Jason W. Cook Reg. No. 48,456 MCGUIREWOODS LLP 2000 McKinney Ave., Suite 1400 Dallas, TX 75201 Telephone: (214) 932-6400 Facsimile: (214) 932-6499 Email: [email protected] [email protected] -3- 84815668.1 George B. Davis Reg. No. 68,205 MCGUIREWOODS LLP Gateway Plaza 800 East Canal Street Richmond, VA 23219 Telephone: (804) 775-1000 Facsimile: (804) 775-2016 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Petitioner -4- 84815668.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that on July 8, 2020, a complete and entire copy of Petitioner’s Updated Mandatory Disclosures, was served on the following counsel of record for Patent Owner via electronic mail: Sarah E. Spires, Reg. No. 61,501 Steven W. Hartsell, Reg. No. 58,788 Paul J. Skiermont (pro hac vice) SKIERMONT DERBY LLP 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4400 Dallas, TX 75201 [email protected] By: /George B. Davis/__________ George B. Davis Reg. No. 68,205 [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner -5- 84815668.1 .
Recommended publications
  • T-Mobile Complaint
    Case 1:20-cv-10998 Document 1 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CHICAGO INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC., DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC., INSTRUCTIONAL Case No. __________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION, INC., NORTH AMERICAN CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING JURY TRIAL REQUESTED FOUNDATION, INC., PORTLAND REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, TWIN CITIES SCHOOLS’ TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC, CLEARWIRE LEGACY LLC f/k/a CLEARWIRE CORPORATION, T-MOBILE US, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Chicago Instructional Technology Foundation, Inc., Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc., Instructional Telecommunications Foundation, Inc., North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc., Portland Regional Educational Telecommunications Corporation, and Twin Cities Schools’ Telecommunications Group, Ind. by and through their undersigned attorneys, allege upon personal knowledge and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to stop Defendants from unlawfully pirating their spectrum and damages from Defendant T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) for its wrongful taking of Case 1:20-cv-10998 Document 1 Filed 05/22/20 Page 2 of 37 that spectrum. Plaintiffs are six nonprofit organizations that have been granted more than 60 licenses by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to operate Educational Broadband Service (“EBS”) channels in the 2.5 GHz spectrum band for educational purposes in markets across the country. In furtherance of their educational purposes, Plaintiffs agreed in July 2006 to lease their excess EBS spectrum capacity (“Spectrum”) to Defendants Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II LLC and Clearwire Legacy LLC (together, “Clearwire”) for commercial use over a thirty-year term.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Mobile USA to Acquire Helio for Approximately $39 Million in Equity
    Virgin Mobile USA to Acquire Helio for Approximately $39 Million in Equity - Additional strategic investment totaling $50 million made by Virgin Group and SK Telecom at $8.50 per share - Improved capital structure through increased liquidity and $50 million paydown of senior secured credit facility - Incremental $60 million added to revolving credit facility - Maximum assumption of $10 million debt and $15 million net working capital liabilities - Net debt reduction of approximately $35 million upon closing - Approximately 170,000 Helio customers with approximately $80 ARPU - Entry into postpaid segment through acquisition of highly sophisticated customer platform supporting unique user applications - Improved network rates and ability to realize significant operational synergies - Adjusted EBITDA accretive in 2008, excluding non-recurring transition costs Note: Virgin Mobile USA will host a conference call today for investors and analysts to discuss the details of the transaction and its ongoing growth strategy. The call will be broadcast live on the Internet at 11:00 A.M. EDT on Friday, June 27, 2008. Det WARREN, N.J., June 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. (NYSE: VM), a leading national provider of wireless communications services, today announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Helio, a joint venture between SK Telecom and EarthLink, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELNK) providing highly advanced postpaid products and services with unique user applications. Under the terms of the agreement, Virgin Mobile USA will acquire Helio from SK Telecom and EarthLink for limited partnership units equivalent to 13 million shares of Virgin Mobile USA class A common stock, with a value of $39 million based on the closing price of Virgin Mobile USA's class A shares on June 26, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D
    “We recognized that a shift was occuring in consumer mindset from some of the extravagances of the previous few years to a focus on value.” 1 Virgin Mobile USA 2008 Annual Report 2008 WAS A TRANSFORMATIONAL YEAR AT VIRGIN MOBILE USA. In late 2007 we began to see early signs of the global recession in our customer base. As gas prices began to rise and budgets tightened, our customers cut back on their mobile usage in order to optimize spending. We recognized that a shift was occuring in consumer mindset from some of the extravagances of the previous few years to a focus on value. At Virgin Mobile USA, we have always focused on providing value and fl exibility to our customers, allowing them to change plans according to their budgetary needs so they can get the most from their wireless service. We realized that now more than ever, we needed to emphasize our value proposition and focus our message on the value we off er to consumers. And so we began to implement a number of strategic and operational initiatives in 2008 that focused on value – on the value we bring to consumers, as well as putting the right operational initiatives in place to build shareholder value. Virgin Mobile USA 2008 Annual Report 2 1. CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF OUR HEADLINE NUMBERS 2. DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE OUR COST STRUCTURE 3. OFFER OUR CUSTOMERS A FULL SUITE OF SERVICES, INCLUDING A POSTPAID PRODUCT 4. IMPROVE OUR BALANCE SHEET AND LIQUIDITY As many of our customers had reduced their usage 2008. These initiatives showed an immediate impact due to the emerging economic challenges, we began in the third quarter, helping to improve our gross add 2008 with negative trend lines in many metrics, trend lines from a decline of 10% year over year in including revenues, customer acquisition and Adjusted Q1, to positive 8% growth in Q3 and fl at gross adds in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Q4 within a diffi cult retail environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Emergency Alerts Mobile Penetration Strategy
    WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS MOBILE PENETRATION STRATEGY August 2013 Task Lead Daniel Gonzales Task Staff Edward Balkovich Brian Jackson Jan Osburg Andrew Parker Evan Saltzman Ricardo Sanchez Shoshana Shelton Chuck Stelzner Dulani Woods Henry H. Willis Director, Homeland Security and Defense Center National Defense Research Institute Jack Riley Vice President and Director, National Security Research Division Director, National Defense Research Institute Acknowledgments The National Defense Research Institute, a division of the RAND Corporation, performed this analysis for the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate. The NDRI team extends its deep appreciation to members of the emergency response and wireless communications communities for their cooperation, information, and feedback; their contributions are the foundation of this report. Further, the NDRI team offers its gratitude to the emergency responders whose dedication and commitment ensure the safety of our families, our communities, and our nation. This report is a tribute to their service. In addition, we would like to extend our appreciation for constructive peer reviews provided by Marvin Sirbu of Carnegie Mellon University and by David Senty. NDRI Publication Number: PR-594-OSD iii Preface The objective of this analysis, performed for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology Directorate, was to independently assess the coverage and penetration of the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system, and to offer recommendations to improve the availability, coverage, and penetration of WEA to the U.S. public. The intended audience of this report is U.S. government decision makers; commercial mobile service providers; mobile wireless device manufacturers; and federal, state, local, and tribal alert originators.
    [Show full text]
  • HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon
    HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon Wireless 310-013 Verizon Wireless 310-014 TEST IMSI HNI 310-016 Cricket Communications 310-020 Union Telephone Company 310-030 AT&T Mobility 310-035 ETEX Communications, LP (d/b/a) ETEX Wireless 310-050 Alaska Communications 310-060 Consolidated Telcom 310-070 AT&T Mobility 310-080 AT&T Mobility 310-090 Cricket Communications, LLC 310-100 New Mexico RSA 4 East Limited Partnership 310-110 Pacific Telecom Inc. 310-120 SPRINTCOM, INC. 310-130 Carolina West Wireless 310-140 GTA Wireless LLC 310-150 AT&T Mobility 310-160 T-Mobile USA 310-170 AT&T Mobility 310-180 West Central Wireless 310-190 Alaska Wireless Communications, LLC 310-200 T-Mobile USA 310-210 T-Mobile USA 310-220 T-Mobile USA 310-230 T-Mobile USA 310-240 T-Mobile USA 310-250 T-Mobile USA 310-260 T-Mobile USA 310-270 T-Mobile USA 310-280 AT&T Mobility 310-290 NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 310-300 Blanca Telephone Company 310-310 T-Mobile USA 310-320 Smith Bagley, Inc. dba CellularOne 310-330 Wireless Partners LLC 310-340 Limitless Mobile, LLC 310-350 Verizon Wireless 310-360 Cellular Network Partnership dba Pioneer Cellular 310-370 Docomo Pacific, Inc. 310-380 AT&T Mobility 310-390 TX-11 Acquisition, LLC 310-400 Wave Runner LLC 310-410 AT&T Mobility 310-420 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 310-430 GCI Communications Corp 310-440 Numerex Corp 310-450 North East Cellular Inc. 310-460 Newcore Wireless 310-470 Sprint 310-480 Wave Runner LLC 310-490 T-Mobile USA 310-500 Public Service Cellular, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Town of Willington's Permitting System Requires Applicants to Have
    Town of Willington Land Use and Building Department Willington Town Office Building 40 Old Farms Road Willington, CT 06279 The Town of Willington’s permitting system requires applicants to have a valid email address to apply for permits, receive approvals and other permit documents. This is also the primary contact point for communicating to an applicant regarding building inspections or additional information needed during the permit review process. This email address not only allows the applicant to communicate directly with department staff, but it also allows Town staff to transmit permit documents, approvals and certificates directly to the applicant. The Town of Willington does not mail paper copies of permit approvals and/or certificates. If you do not have an email address, but do have a mobile phone that is capable of receiving text messages, that can be used in lieu of a traditional email address.. Every wireless carrier in America allows emails to be sent as text messages to a mobile phone (standard text messaging rates will apply). The only information you need is the phone number and the wireless carrier. The mobile email address for each carrier is listed below: T-Mobile [10-digit phone number]@tmomail.net Example: [email protected] AT&T Wireless (formerly Cingular) [10-digit phone number]@txt.att.net Example: [email protected] Verizon [10-digit-number]@vtext.com Example: [email protected] Boost Mobile [10-digit phone number] @sms.myboostmobile.com Example: [email protected] Cricket Wireless [10-digit phone number]@sms.mycricket.com Example: [email protected] Town of Willington Land Use and Building Department Willington Town Office Building 40 Old Farms Road Willington, CT 06279 Sprint [10-digit phone number]@messaging.sprintpcs.com Example: [email protected] Tracfone or Straight Talk The address varies.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum Opinion and Order, Declaratory Ruling, and Order on Reconsideration
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 13-92 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications of SOFTBANK CORP., Starburst II, ) IB Docket No. 12-343 Inc., Sprint Nextel Corporation, and Clearwire ) Corporation ) ) For Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and ) Authorizations ) ) Petitions for Reconsideration of Applications of ) ULS File Nos. 0005480932, et al. Clearwire Corporation for Pro Forma Transfer of ) Control ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, DECLARATORY RULING, AND ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: July 3, 2013 Released: July 5, 2013 By the Commission: Acting Chairwoman Clyburn and Commissioner Pai issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Description of the Applicants .......................................................................................................... 5 1. SoftBank Corp. and Starburst II, Inc......................................................................................... 5 2. Sprint Nextel Corporation ......................................................................................................... 8 3. Clearwire Corporation............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Um 1522, Order, 12/7/2016
    ORDER NO. 11 lfbj /;, / 2 ENTERED DEC 0 7 2016 BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON UM 1522 In the Matter of VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L.P., ORDER Petition to Relinquish ETC and ETP Designations. DISPOSITION: STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION ADOPTED This order memorializes our decision, made and effective at our December 6, 2016 Regular Public Meeting, to adopt Staffs recommendation in this matter. The Staff Report with the recommendation is attached as Appendix A. Dated this / day of December^ 2016, at Salem, Oregon. / ^.-^^^^^Lisa'D. Hardie ^"^ —i_ John Savage^_^' Chair . - Commissioner •<~t^ ': »c.. ->"•?* - '• u^ '""tf?- :T— -?^;—,'.^>i/; :/ Stephen M. Bloom <1-. ' • • ^f:^y~ -/-, Commissioner A party may request rehearing or reconsideration of this order under ORS 756.561. A request for rehearing or reconsideration must be filed with the Commission within 60 days of the date of service of this order. The request must comply with the requirements in OAR 860-001-0720. A copy of the request must also be served on each party to the proceedings as provided in OAR 860-001-0180(2). A party may appeal this order by filing a petition for review with the Circuit Court for Marion County in compliance with ORS 183.484. ORDER NO. 1 g 4 7^ 2 ITEM NO. CA2 PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON STAFF REPORT PUBLIC MEETING DATE: December 6, 2016 REGULAR CONSENT X EFFECTIVE DATE Upon Approval DATE: November 28, 2016 TO: Public Utility Commission FROR/I: KayMannos"^y'^ ^ /]^ ^- ^ ,/i(-6- THROUGH: Jason Eisdorfer and Bryan C6nway SUBJECT: VIRGIN MOBILE USA. LP. ^ASSURANCE WIRELESS): (Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Neal CEO & Founder KAJEET INC. 7101 Wisconsin Ave., Suite
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Carriers Eligible for Universal Service Support ) WC Docket No. 09-197 ) kajeet Inc. ) ) Petition for Designation as a Lifeline Eligible ) Telecommunications Carrier ) ) AMENDED PETITION FOR DESIGNATION AS AN ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CARRIER TO PARTICIPATE IN THE LIFELINE PROGRAM Daniel Neal CEO & Founder KAJEET INC. 7101 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 1111 Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 652-2818 March 26, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION & SUMMARY..................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 2 A. kajeet Overview ...................................................................................................... 2 B. Lifeline and the Pilot Program ................................................................................ 5 III. THE COMMISSION HAS AUTHORITY TO PERFORM THE ETC DESIGNATION ................................................................................................................. 7 IV. KAJEET REQUESTS ETC DESIGNATION IN ITS SERVICE AREAS IN THE FCC STATES FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE LIFELINE PROGRAM ........................ 8 A. kajeet Requests ETC Designation in Its Wireless Service Area ............................. 8 B. kajeet’s ETC Designation Petition Seeks Authority to Participate in the Lifeline Program Only ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assurance Wireless Phones Shop Virgin Mobile
    Assurance Wireless Phones Shop Virgin Mobile Muslim Sascha recedes no dicynodont flunks Tuesdays after Sherman bronzing undeservedly, quite Argive. Elwood remains uncelebrated: she lignify her borecole apostrophizing too belligerently? Nonconclusive and transformative Hollis laicizing dauntlessly and reinforces his Irishwoman upstaged and slam-bang. All possible information is awaiting approval and virgin wireless phones mobile assurance wireless We must earn better when you done our links. Send and asked to find what do for it be added min flip phones do not receive important that we able bodied tax. Annual certification link there are precious are called, Tom. Click manage your situation and shop with customer but you assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile right and cell phone it assures us? Using assurance cell network before assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile? Reverification and model up the links its vga camera. We updated the article. Fep_object be a few people receive a sticker on virgin wireless phones or change. Access wireless and assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile? Guy there are a mobile usa cellular network, if you shop smarter than assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile usa did you have a new customers who love the? Wiggle the free phones that they are using a look into carriers have to do not help you? Just saw an impact with virgin group will assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile account per household. Its original packaging and shop the new month assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile? To assurance wireless phones shop virgin mobile assurance wireless cell phone go with a land line that i would you shop.
    [Show full text]
  • Sprint Nextel Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2010 Results
    Sprint Nextel Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2010 Results Company Release - 02/10/2011 07:00 Added nearly 1.1 million total wireless subscribers including net postpaid subscriber additions – both bests in nearly five years – and highest ever fourth quarter prepaid net subscriber additions ● Best ever fourth quarter and annual postpaid churn results ● Twelfth consecutive quarter of improvement in Customer Care Satisfaction and First Call Resolution ● Sequential and year-over-year total quarterly net operating revenue growth ● Free Cash Flow* of $913 million in the fourth quarter and $2.5 billion for 2010 The company’s fourth quarter and full year 2010 earnings conference call will be held at 8 a.m. EST today. Participants may dial 800-938-1120 in the U.S. or Canada (706-634-7849 internationally) and provide the following ID: 38599868, or may listen via the Internet at www.sprint.com/investor. OVERLAND PARK, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S) today reported that during the fourth quarter of 2010, the company achieved its best total company wireless subscriber additions and net postpaid additions since the first and second quarters of 2006, respectively. The company added nearly 1.1 million total wireless subscribers driven by net postpaid subscriber additions of 58,000, which include net subscriber additions of 519,000 for the Sprint brand - and the company’s best ever fourth quarter prepaid net subscriber additions of 646,000. The company delivered postpaid churn of 1.86 percent - the best postpaid churn result Sprint has reported in the fourth quarter of any year.
    [Show full text]
  • Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): May 6, 2016 Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Virginia 0-9881 54-1162807 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 500 Shentel Way P.O. Box 459 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (540) 984-4141 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Introductory Note As previously disclosed, on August 10, 2015, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (the “Company”), NTELOS Holdings Corp. (“nTelos”) and Gridiron Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”). On May 6, 2016 (the “Closing Date”), pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub merged with and into nTelos, with nTelos becoming a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”).
    [Show full text]