Bulletin Issue 28 Spring/Summer 2016

These campaigns do not all agree Contents with each other. The slogan common between them is an attempt at mo- Youarewhatyourun 1 tivating us to more closely examine In it for the long haul: A what it is we are putting in our bod- model for long-term free ies. No food movement argues every- software campaigns 3 one needs to be, or should endeavor to become, a Michelin star chef. Every- Mr. Snowden: or how I one acknowledges that people choose learned to stop worrying to spend diﬀerent amounts of time and and love GStreamer 5 energy learning about preparing and Governments pay to eating food. reinvent the wheel, or buy a proprietary wheel 6 User freedom in the age of computer-generated software 7 On the road with RMS 9 We need to ﬁght for strong encryption. And stop DRM in Web standards. 10

But a certain very basic level of You are what you run food literacy is widespread. We take By John Sullivan many of the basics for granted. Even Executive Director if you do not have advanced culinary ou are what you eat is a popular skills, you know that hamburgers do Yslogan in many parts of the world not grow on trees (yet), that food in used by groups encouraging people general is prepared by taking ingredi- to change their eating practices. It ents from diﬀerent places and combin- is used to promote vegetarianism, to ing them, often with heat, and that discourage “junk food,” to campaign if ingredients are not stored or han- against foods containing genetically dled in certain ways, some of them can modiﬁed ingredients, and more. make you sick.

1 You know that with the same or security (sanitation) practices? How similar ingredients, you can prepare a many people know that when they meal at home, or you can have the visit a Web site, their computer is meal prepared for you at a restau- given programs to execute locally be- rant. You know that if you do not hind the scenes, and that these pro- like the way it is prepared at a restau- grams may be doing all kinds of things rant, you can prepare a different ver- they do not want? How many peo- sion at home. You know that even at ple know what source code is, or a restaurant, if your food is not salty that programs are usually transformed enough, you can add more salt your- from human-readable into machine- self. You know that preparing a single only formats? meal can involve several people work- More and more often at the FSF, ing together. You know that, while we are finding our advocacy efforts a meal is presented on a very specific running into challenges related to a plate in one restaurant, the same meal widespread lack of fundamental com- can be presented elsewhere on a differ- puter literacy. This is not because ent plate while still tasting the same people lack the ability to understand, and having the same nutritional value. or that they are doing something Because every healthy human has wrong. It is just a fact that we need to to eat, and eat every day, every hu- address. It is difficult, because others man has to know something about are very happy with the current state food in order to pursue basic happi- of affairs. There are billions of dollars ness. Food-focused movements start from proprietary software and service from these basics and ask people to operators pouring into marketing ma- learn more, in order to convince them terials along the lines of, “we know you to change habits and make different don’t want to have to care about how choices. your computer works, you just want it to work.” When it comes to advocating free software, we often find ourselves Ironically, when computers are de- stuck on the basics. Try re- livered in new formats – cars, flat, reading the above “you know that” round, handheld, goggles, whatever – statements, substituting software for they are often accompanied by adver- meals. Within the sizable portion tising campaigns by these same com- of humanity now using or interacting panies portraying them as something with computers on a daily basis, how so radically new that we should of many people know those basics? How course expect them to come with new many people know that they could re- rules. This is how people who have place the operating system (meal) on been installing whatever software they an iPad or a Microsoft Surface tablet want on their laptops for years ini- (plates), if those devices were not ar- tially accept the idea that Apple can bitrarily locked down? How many tell them they cannot install software people know that their “smart” ther- on their iPad from anyone but Apple, mostat is running computer programs or that if they want to switch to An- written by programmers (chefs) who droid they have to buy a new phone may have failed to follow basic code instead of just flashing their current

2 iPhone. evaluate and sustain long-term free As user freedom advocates, we software activism.2 should get more involved in doing and The HPP campaign launched in encouraging basic computer literacy 2005 to foster work on projects that education. This does not mean ask- are important for increasing the adop- ing people to write their own software, tion and use of free software. For or to concern themselves deeply with the first few years, the list was main- complex software systems. As with tained by FSF staff and board mem- food when we eat out, or when we buy bers, based on our own research and prepared meals or produce at the gro- on feedback occasionally sent in by in- cery store, we trust others to do all or terested people. In 2014, we formed some of the work and detailed under- a committee of free software com- standing for us – we just have general munity leaders, who have done the knowledge about the processes they work of reevaluating and refining the are using, and that general knowledge list based on suggestions from the empowers us to protect ourselves. free software community, the chang- A little bit of knowledge goes a long ing landscape of software and hard- way toward putting people in the po- ware (and consequently, of restrictions sition to make much better, more eth- on computer user freedom), and the ical choices. Just knowing the ba- achievements and failures of projects.3 sics will not make people automati- The most recent revision, which is cally support free software. But know- currently underway, includes the in- ing a little more will make it much eas- troduction of four criteria that define ier for them to give it a fair hearing. If what needs are important for the list. we are successful, we could start advo- But how can we maximize the use- cacy campaigns with the slogan, “You fulness of this list – or any of our are what you run.” campaigns? In the case of this campaign, we have identified projects that In it for the long haul: are critical to the advancement and adoption of free software. But if no- A model for long-term body steps up to work on these proj- free software campaigns ects, if nobody hears about them, they By Georgia Young will never get done. The campaigns Program Manager team helps by acting as a project man- hat is your favorite FSF cam- ager for the committee, publicizing Wpaign?1 How long has it been the list, recommending ways the com- around, and when was the last time munity can help get the work done, you heard about a victory in that celebrating victories, and reevaluat- area of the FSF’s work? These ques- ing the work regularly – essentially, tions came to mind as I begin to in- we must continue our advocacy indef- tegrate the recommendations of the initely. High Priority Projects (HPP) commit- How exhausting! No wonder ac- tee, and it got me thinking about how 2 our three-person campaigns team can See u.fsf.org/1sy for the committee’s analysis, and u.fsf.org/1sz for the list. 1fsf.org/campaigns 3u.fsf.org/15r

3 tivists suffer from burnout. And we may be that we simply need to try cannot stop until we have achieved a again. When change is truly impor- world where all software is free. tant, actions that energize people can So, how do we keep up our momen- benefit from their failure by observ- tum in a years-long effort like the HPP ing what went wrong, and what might list? Here are a few thoughts: be needed to lead to success next Small wins add up over time. The time. Some people at the World Wide aims of the HPP list are impossible Web Consortium (W3C) were dismis- to achieve in one fell swoop, but over sive of our campaign calling for self- time we can chip away at them, bit by ies against Digital Restrictions Man- bit. Once we have updated the list, we agement (DRM) on the Web – but it will be sure to celebrate progress made got their attention and led to conver- toward the fulfillment of any of these sation in the press and between the High Priorities. You will hear about W3C and our movement – conversa- it on fsf.org, in the Free Software tion that those who favor DRM would Supporter, on social media sites, and prefer to avoid. in the press. Celebrate and share your successes. When an HPP need is met, we will announce to you and the rest of the world about it. And we will celebrate you when you help. To keep up motivation, we will share conversations with the people who are working hard to help check a priority free software project off the list. We will also be clear about how you can help – whether that is through coding, testing and bug reports, documentation, advocacy, or funding. This is the kind of work the FSF Revisit and challenge. The list has campaigns team facilitates and cham- been revised several times – exten- pions. We’ve had some successes sively, in the most recent round. This along the way: Six years ago, we rec- is because software has changed – ommended CiviCRM, because it met and the world’s needs have changed. the requirements of the HPP need At one point, Flash dominated the for a fully featured donor and con- Web, so the list recommended a Flash tact management system for nonprof- replacement – now we are focused its.4 More recently, we announced on free phones, decentralization, and that the GNU PDF project was com- other issues. By revisiting the project pleted, thanks to libpoppler’s abil- regularly – and soliciting ideas from ity to support newer PDF features like the community when we do – we keep annotations and forms.5 the work relevant. Wins like these add up, but we can- Patience and perseverance. If we fail, what do we do? We can start 4u.fsf.org/1t9 by reevaluating the project. But it 5u.fsf.org/1ta

4 not do it alone. Everybody in the free intern David Testé even wrote a great software community can help make graphical interface!6 the world more free by participating We doubled down on our commit- in our campaigns – check out all of our ment by booking Edward Snowden to campaigns at fsf.org/campaigns for give the opening keynote as a live in- ways to help. terview from Moscow. To make it more fun, we made the decision to Mr. Snowden: or how record the interview and stream it live. We tested different options and con- I learned to stop worry- cluded on using a WebRTC instance ing and love GStreamer and broadcast it with GStreamer and IceCast. With this new toy coming By Ruben Rodriguez together, we tripled down on our com- Systems Administrator mitment by helping Snowden migrate t the time of LibrePlanet 2016, I his stack to free software. We began Amay have been the newest FSF by researching how to replace his non- employee but I was not a newcomer to free video compositing program (that the conference itself. In the previous ran on Windows), and eventually built four years, my participation involved a hack using even more GStreamer, a talks on Trisquel and GNU IceCat, video compositing tool, a local Real- and were excellent experiences each Time Messaging Protocol feed, a vir- time. Every year, the recordings and tual webcam device, and. . . well, way streaming of the talks seemed to im- too many things for it to sound like prove, but still fall short of expecta- a good idea. But we went to MIT’s tions. When I joined the tech team, Stata Center the two weekends before it became a personal goal of mine the conference and tested the whole to improve LibrePlanet’s video pro- thing,network and all. It worked duction process. The first step was nicely. You can read about and dis- to make the most out of our equip- cuss our setup at u.fsf.org/1tb. ment. We use Libreboot powered lap- Then the day arrived. . . Libre- tops and Elphel cameras, which come Planet. with freely licensed hardware specs We got to the venue at 7 a.m., with and GPLed source code. The devices three hours to unpack all the hard- then connect to servers running fully ware, set up, have a muffin, and go free software. This makes for excellent live with the event (well, that was the freedom standards, but it comes with plan anyway). Daniel Kahn Gillmor, some technical challenges. The Elphel the interviewer of Snowden, arrived at cameras provide high quality video at 8 a.m. and we started to set things the expense of extra post-processing up. Quickly we started to realize the on the laptops – which are not that network smelled funny. The MIT net- powerful – so a lot of experimenting work has a captive portal: to access and optimizing had to be done to get the Internet you must register your de- to a pipeline with low latency, good vice and wait a couple minutes for the image quality and low CPU usage. system to let you through. Since we This was quite the tall order, but we made great progress with it and our 6u.fsf.org/1sn

5 were bringing a bunch of laptops, we huge sums of money, in the form of registered them in advance to avoid public resources, are paid to develop problems, but the captive portal was proprietary software to try to over- still asking us to register. So we did, come the gap between them and the we waited (while the room started to so-called developed nations. fill up), and the network continued I think it is great that govern- to fail for every machine, and even ments pay for software development. for MIT registered staff. We urgently I am also absolutely convinced that it asked the IT department to look into should all be free, especially if it is it, and they quickly fixed the issue. being developed with money coming We had Internet! from people’s taxes. Unfortunately, With the room now quite full and local governments in the emerging only five minutes to spare, we con- economies do not use free software nected with Snowden on the video- nearly enough; therefore they pay to conference. To our dismay, his screen reinvent the wheel, or buy a propri- blacked out. After some more testing etary wheel, instead of taking advan- we decided to try a different browser tage of the software that has already on Snowden’s end. He moved to been developed and has the freedom to Iceweasel and things were working continue developing without restric- again. This ate so much of our setup tions or licensing costs. time that not only were we already As an example twelve years ago, the past the start time, we still had to Mexican government spent twenty- set and test the recording and stream- four billion pesos (roughly about two ing... which were also failing! billion US dollars at that time) to “de- With my nerves running thin, and velop” a platform called Enciclome- trying not to raise my gaze to the dia that does pretty much the same nearly four-hundred people in the thing Wikipedia does, but is based on room that were looking at my frantic the infamous Microsoft’s Encarta and typing, finally managed to get it work- only adds a few interactive functions.7 ing. We were delayed enough that no Eventually the entire project was testing could be done, so we just de- abandoned due to its absolutely horri- clared it ready. I sat nervously next fying design and the prohibitive licens- to Daniel, and let the keynote start. ing fees the Mexican government was It worked like a charm! obliged to keep paying to use it, with more taxpayer funds, after paying for Governments pay to development. In this case, one of the develop- reinvent the wheel, or ers took the so-called “digital objects” buy a proprietary wheel and created a fork from it called En- cicloabierta (coming from encyclope- By kosa dia and abierta, which is the Spanish Web Developer word for “open”). He kept maintain- We all know that free and gratis ing it even after facing a trial for us- are not the same thing, and ing “copyrighted materials,” but even- sometimes free software is also about money. In the global economic south, 7u.fsf.org/1s-

6 tually stopped doing it due to lack of and join the online LibrePlanet advo- resources. cacy group focused on this issue.8 There are several other cases of governments paying for the “develop- User freedom in the age ment” of the exact same piece of code in different counties, either for wa- of computer-generated ter and public services management or software even public schools administration. By Chris Webber While free software is a widespread GNU Maintainer ideal among many developed circles, any of us share a vision for it is not in most emerging economies’ Mthe way software, free or other- governments. And that, mixed with wise, is developed: software is writ- ambitious salespeople, companies, and ten by a programmer as “source code” corrupt governments, makes a broth and transformed through some mech- for “those who know” to make millions anisms into “object code.” As free out of poor people’s taxes instead of software activists, we are used to using those funds to do real develop- thinking about our legal, development. The governments could both ment, and community processes and save money and make better use of the tooling in terms of this workflow. funds by getting it back to the com- But what happens when software munity that started and supported which used to be written manually the software development in the first by humans is developed generatively place. through other software? How does Spreading the existence of such free this affect software and user freedom? software among all people, but espe- Of course, by speaking of the above cially within non-governmental orga- I am talking about artificial intelli- nizations who struggle to make gov- gence (AI), a topic and term which is ernment more transparent, can both both compelling and vague. At one reduce corruption and save millions of point almost everything in the world pesos, soles, quetzales, guaranís, bo- of computers was considered to be “ar- livares, colones, lempiras and reales tificial intelligence,” including funda- all across Latin American and the mental building blocks like compilers. world’s emerging economies. But fur- This has lead to what is sometimes thermore, it will add some great sto- called “the AI effect,” where every- ries to the book of a different history thing is considered “artificial intelli- for humankind as a whole. gence” until we know how to do it. A lot of people around the free This has lead to not only push back software movement are fed up with against the term “AI” but even its pur- what government does, and especially suit; why chase a concept which ceases about what is done with money com- to exist once uncovered? ing from taxes, but this is a great I think this is missing something chance to make it do the right thing. important: regardless of term vague- So, if you feel inspired by any of these ness, original visions for AI aimed ideas, look at “Measures Governments 8See u.fsf.org/1t0 and u.fsf.org/1t1, re- Can Use to Promote Free Software” spectively.

7 for machines which could think for ated AI system to ask it why it did or program themselves. This vi- what it did. But will the car manu- sion permitted the idea of “genera- facturer permit you to do so? tive software,” where humans were Through this example, we can not manually writing so much of the quickly realize that all four software logic of the system. But much of freedoms still apply: the freedom to the resources towards AI research ta- run, study, redistribute, and redis- pered off through the “AI Winter” tribute modified versions of an AI. It which settled in through the 1980s is also easy to see that not everyone and 1990s. Since the “AI Winter,” might want you to have these rights; we’ve seen the majority of program- one can easily imagine a less scrupu- ming resources going towards other lous manufacturer saying, “I’m sorry, things like web development, graphi- we can’t let you talk to that AI... cal interfaces, business needs, games, that’s our AI.” (Thus one can eas- and so on. Typically development has ily see that even generative software involved humans manually writing the should not have owners.) logic underpinning the system. So, software freedom applies, but Recently this has been changing. how does it “work?” It may be hard There has been much news around to apply the methodologies we are Google beating Atari games and Go used to when humans are not manu- 10 champions, not through manually ally programming the software used. written strategies, but through neu- Still, one can imagine collaborative ral networks which are trained to methodologies that do work on the build something resembling human in- basis of sharing some dataset; per- tuition. Likewise, many more com- haps many users (programmers and panies are hiring for positions involv- non-programmers alike) helping train ing “machine learning” to reduce the software generated via genetic pro- amount of manual programming re- gramming. quired. And what of our legal tools? Does In other words, the AI Winter has copyright apply? Does copyleft ap- thawed. So where does this leave free ply? If not, are there other ways to software? protect the commons of software being One question we might ask is, “do developed as others attempt to lock it user freedom questions still apply?” down? Let’s consider a scenario.9 Imagine There are multiple directions of gen- you are in a generatively programmed erative software to approach, from self-driving car, and the car unexpect- machine learning to symbolic-based edly swerves off the road into a ditch. expert reasoning systems to genetic Afterwards, you would like to ask the programming. Some of these systems car, “why did you do what you did?” may be more appealing than others; Via some mechanism, you could in systems which clearly express their theory “talk to” the machine’s gener- 10 This led fellow free software activist Asheesh Laroia to observe that perhaps this 9Thanks to Gerald Sussman for inspiring demonstrates that “open source as method- this example through conversations at the ology” was a distraction, and that software FSF’s 30th anniversary party. freedom was the real goal all along.

8 symbolic reasoning may be preferable America’s most important editorial (and are more “accountable”). At this meeting and an important cultural fes- time, what is most important is to get tival, to speak on the importance of more free software activists exploring a free digital society and warned at- this space. tendees of the dangers of the Trans- Happy spelunking! Pacific Partnership’s restrictions on computing and the Internet.11 He took advantage of the visit to give six Get 10% off! other speeches at different universities throughout Mexico, including at the Universidad Tecnológica de la Mix- teca, as a guest of KadaSoftware, a Support the Free Software part of the university that is dedi- Foundation by purchasing cated to supporting the school and GNU Press merchandise. the region through software development and an exemplary part of the Visit our NEW shop.fsf.org free software movement. and enter discount code In India he gave speeches in Delhi SPRING2016. and Bhopal and spoke at two different tech festivals, in Pilani and in Roorkee. Likewise, he spoke at Fos- On the road with RMS setcon, in Orlando, FL, and then in Madrid, at Retina 2016, a confer- By Jeanne Rasata ence directed at professionals respon- Assistant to the President sible for the digital transformation of ichard Stallman (RMS) is not their companies, and to Istanbul Tech Rslowing down! Over the past six Talks, which targets software engi- months, with his characteristic un- neers. Even when his audience is ex- flinching focus, he has continued get- perienced developers, he continues to ting the word out on computing ethics open eyes to the social implications of and raising awareness of the social is- software. sues at stake: since we last wrote you, In Canada, he spoke both at the he has attended over a dozen confer- Université Laval, in Quebec City, and ences and given forty-one speeches in then in Montreal, at the III Colloque thirty-seven cities across eleven coun- libre de l’ADTE, which promotes free tries and three continents. software in colleges and universities in Last fall, in Paris, he spoke to Quebec. Supélec’s researchers and doctoral Back in the US, he spoke at students about the importance of free MIT and at Oakland University, in hardware designs. In Ghent, Stock- Rochester, MI, in addition to speaking holm, Østersund, Barcelona, Utrecht, at LibrePlanet, the FSF’s annual con- Athens and France, he addressed di- ference, and handing out this year’s verse student audiences and the gen- Free Software Awards. eral public alike. All throughout his travels, RMS He attended Guadalajara’s annual Feria Internacional del Libro, Latin 11u.fsf.org/1t6

9 highlighted the injustices of propri- them, both to protect the new politi- etary software through user subjection cal power of encryption, but also be- to developers’ power, exemplified by cause weakening it would cause huge surveillance, DRM, and back doors. collateral damage to millions of inno- Please write to rms-assist@gnu. cent people using the Internet and the org with any photographs you would global financial system. like us to share on RMS’s blog, at fsf. The mainstream media has covered org/blogs/rms, speeches to publish the FBI versus Apple fight, but so in our audio-video archive, or to ex- 12 far the free software movement has tend a speaking invitation to RMS. not been able to effectively leverage it See u.fsf.org/zi for a list of his con- as an opportunity to teach the public firmed engagements. the deeper truth about our computing rights: encryption is important, We need to fight for but no real popular control of computers is possible without free software strong encryption. And at the center. Programs like GnuPG, stop DRM in Web Tor, and OpenSSL are the gold stan- dard in encryption because their free standards. licenses grant users the transparency By Zak Rogoff necessary to verify that they are se- Campaigns Manager cure, and the freedom to fix insecuri- ties. If we celebrate Apple’s stand for Encryption is the backbone of pri- strong encryption uncritically, we miss vacy and anonymity technologies, an opportunity to point out that Ap- and these technologies are an im- ple’s proprietary encryption (while it portant driving force for democracy is a step up from proprietary software in the 21st century. Their adop- without encryption) still represents an tion is partially equalizing the bal- evolutionary dead-end for our society. ance of power between people and Just as the FBI hopes to set a governments, enabling transparency, precedent by making Apple crack its accountability, and freedom. Intim- own encryption, the DRM lobby is idated, the law-enforcement arms of currently pushing for a major polit- many governments are attempting to ical victory to legitimize its restric- slow this process by banning strong tive technology and make it easier encryption. and cheaper to implement. DRM is The FBI took a big swing at the software that runs on your devices and right to encrypt this spring, when it polices your behavior. It is what stops attempted to force Apple to break its you from copying streaming videos own encryption on an iPhone. They and songs onto your hard drive, pre- did not quite succeed, but it is im- vents you from using some programs portant that we stay vigilant – they without an Internet connection, and will try again to strong-arm tech com- stops you from moving books between panies into weakening widely-used en- e-readers. cryption systems. We must stop Its owners claim DRM is neces- 12audio-video.gnu.org sary to “protect creators” by stop-

10 ping unauthorized copying. While of abuse and attack that a software au- this sounds very virtuous, it is rarely, thor can perpetrate on a user. Even if ever, true. The precise motivations if a DRM’s owner does not actually vary, but the goal of DRM is usually command it to attack or spy on users, either removing functionality and sell- others often slip through the hole it ing it back piecemeal, or preventing has punched in users’ security. competitors from making interopera- Fearful of public scrutiny, the DRM ble products. lobby has passed laws (the Digital Mil- Recently, Netflix, Apple, Google, lennium Copyright Act in the US, fol- and Microsoft have crafted a new lowed by similar laws and treaties in universal DRM system for the Web, many countries) to effectively gag se- called Encrypted Media Extensions curity researchers seeking to expose (EME). They are trying to get it rat- and fix vulnerabilities in systems that ified by the W3C, which sets official include DRM. This means that the Web standards. For many of the same best system we have for protecting reasons that we need to protect strong users from insecure programs – inde- encryption, we also need to stop this pendent expert review – is outlawed. power grab by those that profit from To protect user control and digi- DRM. tal security, we need to make DRM politically expensive. Currently, we Weakened encryption loosens our are fighting this struggle in the arena control on our computers. DRM does of Web standards. The free software this as well, by encumbering our de- community plays a leadership role in vices with proprietary code that treats the fight against this backwards step us as adversaries. DRM is impossi- for the Web, through our Defective by ble to implement effectively with free Design campaign. We call on anyone software, so any system that requires concerned with strong encryption to it also locks out users that are com- join us by signing our petition and by mitted to protecting their own free- adding a protest selfie to our growing dom. Perhaps worst of all, the contin- gallery.13 ued legal and political acceptance of There is a blooming global con- DRM marginalizes our general claim sciousness of the need for secure and to control over our computers, and le- user-controlled technology, and DRM gitimizes the idea that media distrib- is not a part of that picture. Resist utors’ business models should trump DRM with us, and demand a Web user freedom. that puts users first. Encryption is an essential pillar in computer security, which is one of the reasons that such diverse groups are united against government attempts to weaken it. Like weakened encryption, DRM is a nightmare for security. Because it is a black box that users are compelled to install and that is de- signed to be hard to remove, DRM be- comes a tempting home for every kind 13defectivebydesign.org/action

11 How to Contribute

Associate Membership: Become an associate member of the FSF. Members will receive a bootable USB card, e-mail for- warding, and an account on the FSF’s Jabber/XMPP server. To sign up or get more information, visit member.fsf.org or write to [email protected]. Donate to the FSF with Bitcoin. Online: Use your credit card or Copyright c 2016 PayPal account to make a dona- Free Software Foundation, Inc. tion at donate.fsf.org or con- tact [email protected] for more The articles in this bulletin are information on supporting the individually licensed under the FSF. Creative Commons Attribu- Jobs tion No Derivative Works 4.0. : List your job oﬀers on our http://creativecommons.org/ jobs page: fsf.org/jobs. licenses/by-nd/4.0/ Free Software Directory: Browse and download from thou- Photos by Kori Feener are li- sands of diﬀerent free software censed under the Creative projects: directory.fsf.org. Commons Attribution-Share- Alike 4.0 International License. Volunteer: To learn more, visit http://creativecommons.org/ fsf.org/volunteer. licenses/by-sa/4.0/ LibrePlanet: Find local groups Published twice yearly by the Free in your area or start your own at libreplanet.org Software Foundation, 51 Franklin ! Street, 5th Floor, Boston, MA Free Software Supporter: Re- 02110-1301, (617) 542-5942. ceive our monthly email newslet- [email protected], fsf.org ter: fsf.org/fss.