DOCSLIB.ORG

Votes and Proceedings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Votes and Proceedings No. 89 Wednesday 31 January 2018 Votes and Proceedings The House met at 11.30 am. Prayers 1 Questions to (1) the Secretary of State for Wales (2) the Prime Minister 2 Freedom of Information (Amendment): Motion for leave to bring in a Bill (Standing Order No. 23) Ordered, That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for the disclosure of information held by public authorities or by persons contracted to provide services for them or on their behalf; to amend the Freedom of Information Act 2000; and for connected purposes; That Louise Haigh, Tommy Sheppard, Andy Slaughter, Paula Sherriff, Jo Stevens, Ian C. Lucas, Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods, Nic Dakin, Alex Sobel, Diana Johnson, Anna Turley, Clive Efford, present the Bill. Louise Haigh accordingly presented the Bill. Bill read the first time; to be read a second time on Friday 15 June, and to be printed (Bill 159). 3 Business of the House (Opposition Day) Ordered, That at today’s sitting, paragraph (2) of Standing Order No. 31 (Questions on amendments) shall apply to the Motion in the name of Jeremy Corbyn as if the day were an Opposition Day; and proceedings on the Motion may continue, though opposed, for three hours after commencement of proceedings on the Motion for this Order and shall then lapse if not previously disposed of; and Standing Order No. 41A (Deferred divisions) shall not apply.—(Rebecca Harris.) 4 Government's EU exit analysis Motion made and Question proposed, That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that the EU exit analysis which was referred to in his response to an Urgent Question in the House on 30 January by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union be provided to the Exiting the European Union Committee and made available to all Members on a confidential basis as a matter of urgency.—(Keir Starmer.) The Deputy Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No. 47(1)). 2 Votes and Proceedings: 31 January 2018 No. 89 Resolved, That an humble Address be presented to Her Majesty, That she will be graciously pleased to give directions that the EU exit analysis which was referred to in his response to an Urgent Question in the House on 30 January by the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union be provided to the Exiting the European Union Committee and made available to all Members on a confidential basis as a matter of urgency. 5 Deferred Divisions The Speaker announced the results of the Division which had been deferred to this day, (Standing Order No. 41A). Resolved, That the draft Double Taxation Relief and International Tax Enforcement (Lesotho) Order 2017, which was laid before this House on 14 September 2017, be approved. Division No. 110. Ayes: 306. Noes: 240. Question accordingly agreed to. 6 Business of the House (Restoration And Renewal) Ordered, That at today’s sitting:— (1) proceedings on the motions relating to Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster in the name of Andrea Leadsom may continue, though opposed, for up to three hours at which time proceedings on the Motion on Restoration and Renewal (Report of the Joint Committee) shall lapse if not previously disposed of; (2) the Speaker shall then put forthwith the Questions necessary to dispose of the Motion in the name of Andrea Leadsom relating to Restoration and Renewal (No. 1), should it be moved by a Minister of the Crown; (3) should that Motion be disagreed to, the Speaker shall then put forthwith the Questions necessary to dispose of the Motion in the name of Andrea Leadsom relating to Restoration and Renewal (No. 2), should it be moved by a Minister of the Crown; (4) the Questions referred to in paragraphs (2) and (3) shall include the Questions on any Amendments selected by the Speaker which may then be moved; (5) proceedings may continue, though opposed, after the moment of interruption, and (6) Standing Order No. 41A (Deferred divisions) shall not apply in respect of proceedings specified in this Order.—(Andrea Leadsom.) 7 Restoration and Renewal (Report of the Joint Committee) Motion made and Question proposed, That this House has considered the report of the Joint Committee on Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster (HL Paper 41, HC 659 of Session 2016-17).—(Andrea Leadsom.) The Speaker announced a time limit on backbench speeches (Standing Order No. 47(1)). Question again proposed. Three hours after commencement of the proceedings, the motion lapsed (Order, Today). No. 89 Votes and Proceedings: 31 January 2018 3 8 Restoration and Renewal (No. 1) Motion made and Question proposed (Order, Today), That this House— (1) affirms its commitment to the historic Palace of Westminster and its unique status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, Royal Palace and home of our Houses of Parliament; (2) takes note of the report of the Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster 'Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster', HL Paper 41, HC 659; (3) accepts that there is a clear and pressing need to repair the services in the Palace of Westminster in a comprehensive and strategic manner to prevent catastrophic failure in this parliament, whilst acknowledging the demand and burden on public expenditure and fiscal constraints at a time of prudence and restraint; (4) accepts in principle that action should be taken and funding should be limited to facilitate essential work to the services in this Parliament; (5) agrees to review before the end of the Parliament the need for comprehensive works to take place.—(Andrea Leadsom.) Amendment (c) moved, to insert at end of paragraph (2), '(2A) regrets that no detailed assessment has been carried out of the cost-effectiveness of relocating Parliament away from the Palace of Westminster, and calls for any future review to include such an assessment.'.—(Pete Wishart.) Question put forthwith, That the Amendment be made (Order, Today). The House divided. Division No. 111. Ayes: 47 (Tellers: Pete Wishart, David Linden). Noes: 410 (Tellers: James Duddridge, Simon Hoare). Question accordingly negatived. Amendment (b) moved, to delete paragraphs (4) and (5) and, at end, add: '(4) accordingly endorses the unanimous conclusion of the Joint Committee that a full and timely decant of the Palace is the best and the most cost-effective delivery option, as endorsed by the Public Accounts Committee and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority; (5) accepts that expenditure on the Palace during this Parliament will be limited to preparatory work for the comprehensive programme of works envisaged, together with works essential to ensure the continuing functioning of the Palace; (6) endorses the Joint Committee’s recommendation that a Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority be established by legislation to develop a business case and costed programme for the work to be approved by both Houses of Parliament, and to commission and oversee the work required, and that immediate steps be taken now to establish a shadow sponsor Board and Delivery Authority; (7) instructs the shadow Sponsor Board and Delivery Authority and their statutory successors to apply high standards of cost-effectiveness and demonstrate value for money in the business case, to report back to Parliament with up to date costings and a realistic timetable for the duration of the work, and to include measures to ensure: the repair and replacement of mechanical and electrical services, fire safety improvement works, the removal of asbestos, repairs to the external and internal fabric of the Palace, the removal of unnecessary and unsightly accretions to the Palace, the improvement of visitor access including the provision of new educational and other facilities for visitors and full access for people with disabilities; 4 Votes and Proceedings: 31 January 2018 No. 89 (8) affirms that the guarantee that both Houses will return to their historic Chambers as soon as possible should be incorporated in primary legislation.'.—(Meg Hillier.) Question put forthwith, That the Amendment be made (Order, Today). The House divided. Division No. 112. Ayes: 236 (Tellers: Anna Turley, Clive Efford ). Noes: 220 (Tellers: James Duddridge, Simon Hoare). Question accordingly agreed to. Main question, as amended, put forthwith (Order, Today). The House divided. Division No. 113. Ayes: 234 (Tellers: Anna Turley, Clive Efford). Noes: 185 (Tellers: James Duddridge, Simon Hoare). Question accordingly agreed to. Resolved, That this House— (1) affirms its commitment to the historic Palace of Westminster and its unique status as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, Royal Palace and home of our Houses of Parliament; (2) takes note of the report of the Joint Committee on the Palace of Westminster 'Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster', HL Paper 41, HC 659; (3) accepts that there is a clear and pressing need to repair the services in the Palace of Westminster in a comprehensive and strategic manner to prevent catastrophic failure in this parliament, whilst acknowledging the demand and burden on public expenditure and fiscal constraints at a time of prudence and restraint; (4) accordingly endorses the unanimous conclusion of the Joint Committee that a full and timely decant of the Palace is the best and the most cost-effective delivery option, as endorsed by the Public Accounts Committee and the Infrastructure and Projects Authority; (5) accepts that expenditure on the Palace during this Parliament will be limited to preparatory work for the comprehensive
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Think of the Consequences
    NHSCA EDITORIAL September 2014 Think of the consequences This July, a passenger aircraft was shot down such clinics are usually staffed by GPs with a over Ukraine by a ground–to–air missile which, Special Interest (GPSIs), many of whom do not it seems likely, was provided to one of the fulfil the supposedly mandatory experience armed groups in the area by a third party. This and training criteria for such posts. David Eedy appalling event raises many issues, including points out that the use of these ‘community’ the immorality of the arms trade and the results clinics has never been shown to reduce hospital of interference in a neighbouring country’s waiting lists, they threaten to destabilise the territory and politics, and beyond this there are hospital service and they cost a lot more than the issues of unforeseen consequences. Those hospital clinics. The service thus provided is operating this complex modern equipment not acting as a useful filter to reduce hospital almost certainly had no intention of annihilating referrals and causes only delay in reaching a true 298 innocent travellers, neither, presumably, specialist service. Further, we cannot ignore the did the providers think they might. It seems inevitable impact of this continued outsourcing likely that inadequate training, against a on education of students and trainees as the background of inexperience of such dangerous service is fragmented. At a recent public equipment, resulted in this disaster. Unforeseen, meeting a woman who had attended a local but not unforeseeable. private sector dermatology clinic told us that she could not fault the service - everyone was very Nearer to home, we are increasingly aware of professional and the surroundings pleasant - decisions about clinical services made by those except that they could not deal with her problem who know little about them, do not wish to look and she had to be referred on to the hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Red Book
    The For this agenda-setting collection, the leading civil society umbrella groups ACEVO and CAF worked with Lisa Nandy MP to showcase some of Red Book Labour’s key thinkers about the party’s future relationship with charities The and social enterprises. The accompanying ‘Blue Book’ and ‘Yellow Book’ feature similar essays from the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Parties. ‘This collection of essays shows the depth and vibrancy of thinking across the Labour movement on this important issue and makes a vital the Voluntary of Sector Red Book contribution to the debate in the run-up to the next election.’ Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP, Leader of the Labour Party of the ‘I hope this collection will be a provocation to further dialogue with Labour and with all the major political parties. It demonstrates a willingness to listen … that our sector should be grateful for.’ Voluntary Sector Sir Stephen Bubb, Chief Executive, ACEVO ‘The contributions in this collection show that the Labour Party possesses exciting ideas and innovations designed to strengthen Britain’s charities, Civil Society and the Labour Party and many of the concepts explored will be of interest to whichever party (or parties) are successful at the next election.’ after the 2015 election Dr John Low CBE, Chief Executive, Charities Aid Foundation With a foreword by the Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP £20 ISBN 978-1-900685-70-2 9 781900 685702 acevo-red-book-cover-centred-spine-text.indd All Pages 05/09/2014 15:40:12 The Red Book of the Voluntary Sector Civil Society and the Labour Party after
    [Show full text]
  • Owen Hatherley El Gobierno De Londres 93 Shaohua Zhan La Cuestión De La Tierra En China 131
    NEW LEFT REVIEW 122 SEGUNDA ÉPOCA mayo - junio 2020 PANDEMIA Mike Davis Entra en escena el monstruo 11 Ai Xiaoming Diario de Wuhan 20 Marco D’Eramo La epidemia del filósofo 28 N. R. Musahar Medidas de inanición en la India 34 Rohana Kuddus Limoncillo y plegarias 42 Mario Sergio Conti Pandemonio en Brasil 50 Vira Ameli Sanciones y enfermedad 57 R. Taggart Murphy Oriente y Occidente 67 ARTÍCULOS Michael Denning El impeachment como forma social 75 Owen Hatherley El gobierno de Londres 93 Shaohua Zhan La cuestión de la tierra en China 131 CRÍTICA Chris Bickerton La persistencia de Europa 153 Terry Eagleton Ciudadanos de Babel 161 Lola Seaton ¿Ficciones reales? 168 John Merrick Dorando la Gran Bretaña de 182 posguerra WWW.NEWLEFTREVIEW.ES © New Left Review Ltd., 2000 Licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) INSTITUTO tds DEMOCRACIA SUSCRÍBETE owen hatherley EL GOBIERNO DE LONDRES ondres es probablemente la capital más descollante, en relación con el país que gobierna, entre los grandes Estados. En cierto sentido, siempre ha sido así: la sede del poder político en Westminster y el centro financiero de la City se Lestablecieron allí desde la Edad Media. Tuvo que hacer frente al desafío que supuso, hasta cierto punto, la aparición de grandes conurbaciones fabriles en las Midlands y el norte de Inglaterra, en Escocia y en el sur de Gales desde principios del siglo xix, pero el eclipse del poder industrial británico desde la Segunda Guerra Mundial ha reforzado la preemi- nencia de Londres. Los límites de la ciudad albergan casi 9 millones de habitantes, un récord histórico, sin incluir una enorme área metro- politana que abarca aproximadamente 14 millones de personas que trabajan en la capital, lo que supone alrededor de cinco veces el tamaño de sus rivales más cercanas en el Reino Unido (el Gran Manchester, Birmingham y Glasgow).
    [Show full text]
  • Radical Nostalgia, Progressive Patriotism and Labour's 'English Problem'
    Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour©s ©English problem© Article (Accepted Version) Robinson, Emily (2016) Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem'. Political Studies Review, 14 (3). pp. 378-387. ISSN 1478-9299 This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/id/eprint/61679/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher’s version. Please see the URL above for details on accessing the published version. Copyright and reuse: Sussex Research Online is a digital repository of the research output of the University. Copyright and all moral rights to the version of the paper presented here belong to the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. To the extent reasonable and practicable, the material made available in SRO has been checked for eligibility before being made available. Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk Author’s Post-Print Copy Radical nostalgia, progressive patriotism and Labour's 'English problem' Emily Robinson, University of Sussex ABSTRACT ‘Progressive patriots’ have long argued that Englishness can form the basis of a transformative political project, whether based on an historic tradition of resistance to state power or an open and cosmopolitan identity.
    [Show full text]
  • The IR35 MP Hit List ­ the 100 Politicians Most Likely to Lose Their Seats
    The UK's leading contractor site. 200,000 monthly unique visitors. GUIDES IR35 CALCULATORS BUSINESS INSURANCE BANKING ACCOUNTANTS INSURANCE MORTGAGES PENSIONS RESOURCES FREE IR35 TEST The IR35 MP hit list ­ The 100 politicians most likely to lose their seats Last December research conducted by ContractorCalculator identified the MPs for whom it will prove most costly to lose the self­employed vote, and published the top 20 from each party. The results were based on data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and contractor sentiment indicated by a previous ContractorCalculator survey. The full results of this research are now published, with the top 100 MPs, ordered by risk of losing their seat, due to the Off­payroll (IR35) reforms that Treasury, HMRC and the Chancellor are attempting to push through Parliament. In total, 85 MPs hold a majority in Parliament that would feasibly be overturned if the expected turnout of IR35­opposing self­employed voters from their constituency were to vote against them, and we list the next 15, making 100 in total, that are potentially under threat if the self­ employed voter turnout is higher than expected. "This single piece of damaging policy could prove catastrophic for all parties involved, not least the Tories, who make up 43% of the at­risk seats,” comments ContractorCalculator CEO, Dave Chaplin. “There is also potentially a lot to gain for some, but those in precarious positions will have to act swiftly and earnestly to win over contractors’ trust.” How we identified the at­risk MPs The research leveraged the data and compared the MPs majority at the last election with the likely number of self­employed voters in their area who would turn out and vote against them.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (9MB)
    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eukropean Movement HKCF Newsletter January 2018
    European Movement in Hammersmith, Kensington, Chelsea & Fulham News No. 5 – January 2018 WELCOME FROM THE CHAIR WHERE to FInd us New Year greetings to EM members, Question your MEPs https://emhkcf.nationbuilder.com associates and all those ready to What are they doing www.facebook.com/emhkcf pass the time of day with us. about Brexit? 25 January 19.00 MEPs have an important place in the @emhkcf This is a crucial year for all who care politics of Brexit. Under the Treaty of [email protected] about our European membership Lisbon, the European Council needs COMMITTEE and who, for many reasons dread to obtain the European Parliament’s Chair – Anne Corbett. being cut out of the EU. consent before it can conclude the [email protected] In May there are the local elections UK/EU27 withdrawal agreement. Secretary – Mike Vessey in which EU citizens have the right They have already reacted with their [email protected] to vote. In October, the UK and EU ‘red lines’. Might they scupper the final Treasurer & Membership institutions aim to have an outline deal (if there is one)? Or will they try to Secretary – Clare Singleton. agreement for the UK’s withdrawal reform it? [email protected] from the EU on the still unknown We are pleased to welcome a cross- Local campaigners terms as to whether we are heading party group of MEPs and former Hammersmith – Keith Mallinson for a ‘hard’ or a soft’ Brexit. And MP to our panel discussion tonight, Kensington – Virginie Dhouibi before March 29, 2019, there needs chaired by Denis MacShane, former Chelsea & Fulham – Christo to be a political agreement between Minister for Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Petition As Lodged
    UNTO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION P E T I T I O N of (FIRST) JOANNA CHERRY QC MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (SECOND) JOLYON MAUGHAM QC, Devereux Chambers, Devereux Court, London WC2R 3JH (THIRD) JOANNE SWINSON MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (FOURTH) IAN MURRAY MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (FIFTH) GERAINT DAVIES MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (SIXTH) HYWEL WILLIAMS MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (SEVENTH) HEIDI ALLEN MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (EIGHTH) ANGELA SMITH MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (NINTH) THE RT HON PETER HAIN, THE LORD HAIN OF NEATH, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW (TENTH) JENNIFER JONES, THE BARONESS JONES OF MOULESCOOMB, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW (ELEVENTH) THE RT HON JANET ROYALL, THE BARONESS ROYALL OF BLAISDON, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW (TWELFTH) ROBERT WINSTON, THE LORD WINSTON OF HAMMERSMITH, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW (THIRTEENTH) STEWART WOOD, THE LORD WOOD OF ANFIELD, House of Lords, London SW1A 0PW (FOURTEENTH) DEBBIE ABRAHAMS MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (FIFTEENTH) RUSHANARA ALI MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (SIXTEENTH) TONIA ANTONIAZZI MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (SEVENTEENTH) HANNAH BARDELL MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (EIGHTEENTH) DR ROBERTA BLACKMAN-WOODS MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (NINETEENTH) BEN BRADSHAW MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (TWENTIETH) THE RT HON TOM BRAKE MP, House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA (TWENTY-FIRST) KAREN BUCK MP, House of Commons, London
    [Show full text]
  • THE BATTLE for BRITAIN
    FABIAN REVIEW The quarterly magazine of the Fabian Society Winter 2015 / fabians.org.uk / £4.95 THE BATTLE for BRITAIN The Fabian Review previews a crucial year for the future shape of the nation. With Nick Forbes, Ivan Lewis, Jonathan Rutherford and Sarah Sackman p8 / Mary Riddell interviews the shadow chancellor John McDonnell p16 / Stephen Beer on what economic credibility means in a changed economy p24 FABIAN NEW YEAR CONFERENCE 2016 FACING THE FUTURE FEATURING Jeremy Corbyn MP Saturday 16 January 2016 #fab16 Institute of Education, London Visit www.fabians.org.uk for information and tickets Contents FABIAN REVIEW Volume 127—No. 4 Leader Andrew Harrop 2 Britain’s uncertain future Shortcuts Jemima Olchawski 3 A new deal for gender Barry Loveday 4 Plodding along Katie Ghose 4 Democratising devolution James Roberts 5 Powering ahead? Alice Gartland 6 A time to be brave Anna Turley 7 Make over Cover story Jonathan Rutherford 8 Rebuilding Labour Britain Ivan Lewis 11 Back together again Sarah Sackman 12 Equal aspiration Nick Forbes 14 True north Interview Mary Riddell 16 John McDonnell Comment Cat Smith 19 A country mile Features Richard Brooks 20 Let’s go to work Mark Rusling 22 The UKIP tipping point? Essay Stephen Beer 24 Credibility now 27 Fabian Society section FABIAN REVIEW FABIAN SOCIETY Editorial Finance and Operations Fabian Review is the quarterly journal of the 61 Petty France Editorial Director and Senior Director of Finance and Fabian Society. Like all publications of the Fabian London SW1H 9EU Research Fellow, Ed Wallis Operations, Phil Mutero Society, it represents not the collective view of 020 7227 4900 (main) Editorial and Communications the Society, but only the views of the individual 020 7976 7153 (fax) Manager, Lucy Snow Fabian Women’s Network writers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Accounts of the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The accounts of the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster Nineteenth Report of Session 2004–05 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 6 April 2005 HC 313 Published on 21 July 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £12.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Allan MP (Liberal Democrat, Sheffield Hallam) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Mrs Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Jon Cruddas MP (Labour, Dagenham) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow Pollock) Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Nigel Jones MP (Liberal Democrat, Cheltenham) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, West Renfrewshire) Mr Siôn Simon MP (Labour, Birmingham Erdington) Mr Gerry Steinberg MP (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Stephen Timms MP (Labour, East Ham) Jon Trickett MP (Labour, Hemsworth) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter to the Pm to Be Signed by Mps and Peers
    OPEN LETTER TO THE PM TO BE SIGNED BY MPS AND PEERS The Rt Hon Boris Johnson MP Prime Minister Office of the Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London, SW1A 2AA May 2020 Dear Prime Minister Subject: OPEN LETTER FROM MPS & PEERS: COVID-19: THEATRE & THE PERFORMING ARTS SECTOR, WHAT’S NEEDED FOR SURVIVAL & RECOVERY Whilst we know you are considering how best to protect and support many areas of the economy, this letter summarises the current and future impact of COVID-19 on performing arts businesses around the UK and calls on you and your teams in DCMS, Treasury and BEIS to take action on what is needed immediately; and over the coming months to rescue the sector and allow theatre to contribute to the future success of the UK. The performing arts’ contribution to the UK: economic & social British theatre (from drama to musical theatre to opera to dance) is a world-class cultural and economic force with British theatrical productions filling cultural venues and theatres from Broadway to Beijing. From small studios to big-budget stages, theatre and the performing arts are part of the fabric of British life. Towns, villages and cities the breadth of the UK have and use theatres for more than seeing a show – they are spaces for many different groups in community to come together to learn, socialise and create. As you know, the creative industries are a motor of growth in local economies from the South East to the North West, from Yorkshire and the Humber to the West Midlands. Theatre’s workforce of 290,000 people includes 70% who are self-employed and move freely between scales and sectors.
    [Show full text]