DOCSLIB.ORG

Conditions in New York City's Poorest Neighborhoods

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conditions in New York City's Poorest Neighborhoods T R EPO R C IVI C No. 88 June 2014 No. POVERTY AND PROGRESS IN NEW YORK I: Conditions in New York City’s Poorest Neighborhoods Stephen Eide Senior Fellow, Manhattan Institute C S L L CENTER FOR STATE AND LOCAL LEADERSHIP AT THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE Published by Manhattan Institute EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New York’s City’s resurgence over the past three decades has been characterized by greater fiscal stability, less crime, less dependence on cash welfare, and sustained economic growth. Although income has increased broadly, the gains have been proportionately greater for the most affluent households. This rise of income inequality has prompted newly elected mayor Bill de Blasio to characterize New York as a “tale of two cities”—and to pledge to improve incomes and quality of life for the least well-off. This study establishes a baseline against which future progress may be measured. It presents a quantitative profile, at the neighborhood level, of the low-income New York that Mayor de Blasio inherited. It inaugurates a new Manhattan Institute series that will chart the progress of poor New York neighborhoods over the coming years. How have the poorest neighborhoods in the five boroughs fared over recent decades? Have conditions improved, declined, or remained the same? The neighborhoods examined in this report are: Mott Haven and Hunts Point in the South Bronx (Bronx Community Districts 1 and 2); Brownsville, Coney Island, and East New York in Brooklyn (Brooklyn Community Districts 16, 13, and 5); East Harlem and Central Harlem in Manhattan (Manhattan Community Districts 11 and 10); Elmhurst and Jackson Heights in Queens (Queens Community Districts 4 and 3); and Stapleton on Staten Island (Staten Island Community District 1). These are the poorest neighborhoods in their respective boroughs, in terms of median household income. Conditions in these neighborhoods will be measured using several metrics: “against themselves,” to chart their progress over recent decades; and against wealthy neighborhoods, as well as the city as a whole. Key findings: • Population trends are healthy in New York’s poorest neighborhoods. After catastrophic losses during the 1970s, several neighborhoods have seen double-digit population increases during recent decades, often outpacing the growth rate for the city as a whole. • The most unequivocal improvement in conditions in New York’s poorest neighborhoods has been the crime decline. In seven of ten neighborhoods surveyed, serious crimes declined by at least 70 percent between 1990 and 2013, with murders down by the same margin in nine. • Citywide, the poverty rate has not changed significantly since 1980 (21.2 percent now versus 20 percent then). Among the poorest neighborhoods in the five boroughs, some have registered a drop in their poverty rate since 1980 (East New York and Central Harlem are down by more than 10 percentage points). Others from the same cohort have seen their poverty rate climb (Jackson Heights and Elmhurst in Queens, both up by over 8 percentage points). • The record is similarly mixed for neighborhood-level changes in real median household income. Some poor neighborhoods have seen strong gains, and a few have experienced decline. It has been gentrifying neighborhoods, in Brooklyn and lower Manhattan, which have experienced the highest growth rate in median household income since 1980. Poverty and Progress in New York I • In nine of the ten poorest neighborhoods in the five boroughs, median gross rent has outpaced median household income since 1980. • Poor neighborhoods continue to show high rates of welfare dependence, although the kind of dependence has changed. A smaller share of the population now receives cash assistance than in 1980, but in nine of the ten neighborhoods, at least 40 percent of residents are on Medicaid—and in seven, at least a third of the population receive food stamps. • Family structure has been unstable in New York City’s poorest neighborhoods for decades. The same six community districts (Mott Haven and Hunts Point in the Bronx; East Harlem and Central Harlem in Manhattan; Brownsville and East New York in Brooklyn) that had 50 percent, or more, of families headed by a single mother in 1980 continued to do so in 2012. • Some of New York’s poorest neighborhoods have made substantial progress in rates of educational attainment. Whereas seven had single-digit rates of adults with a college degree in 1980, only the South Bronx still has not yet reached 10 percent. Civic Report 88 June 2014 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 2 Population 2 Income and Poverty 4 “Inequality in New York City”, by Scott Winship* 7 Housing Costs 7 Crime 8 Welfare Dependence 11 Family Structure and Educational Attainment 11 Conclusion 12 Endnotes *Walter B. Wriston Fellow, Manhattan Institute Cover image: New York City Subway Map ©Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Used with permission. Poverty and Progress in New York I ABOUT THE AUTHOR Stephen D. Eide is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute’s Center for State and Local Leadership. He edits PublicSectorInc.org (@PubSectorInc), a project of the Manhattan Institute, and is also a contributor to the site. His work focuses on public administration, public finance, political theory, and urban policy. His writings have been published in the Worcester Telegram and Gazette, Orange County Register, the New York Post, Interpretation: A Journal of Political Philosophy, and City Journal. He was previously a senior research associate at the Worcester Regional Research Bureau, and holds a bachelor’s degree from St. John’s College in Santa Fe, N.M., and a Ph.D. in political philosophy from Boston College. Civic Report 88 June 2014 POVERTY AND PROGRESS IN NEW YORK I: CONDITIONS IN NEW YORK CITY’S POOREST NEIGHBORHOODS Stephen Eide INTRODUCTION he closest New York gets to an official designation for neighborhood is the “community district,” of which there are 59 citywide. First set out in the mid-1970s, community district boundaries define the jurisdiction of community Tboards, whose members advise city government on land use, budget, and municipal service issues. Community districts range considerably in size, from that of a large town (midtown Manhattan is the small- est, at 52,000) to a moderate-size city (Flushing is 250,000). They can be quite diverse—Brooklyn Community District 6, for instance, encompasses both Red Hook and Park Slope. Most encompass several of what would informally be known as “neighborhoods.”1 Table 1 lists the ten poorest (lowest median household income) com- munity districts in the five boroughs, in 1980 and 2012.2 Table 1: Poorest Neighborhoods in the Five Boroughs, 1980 and 2012 1980 2012 Community district 1980 1980 Community district 2012 2010-12 population median population median household household income income Bronx #3 (Morrisania) 53,635 $6,377 Bronx #1 91,497 $20,867 (Mott Haven, Port Morris) Manhattan #10 105,641 $6,488 Bronx #2 (Hunts Point) 52,246 $20,867 (Central Harlem) Bronx #2 (Hunts Point) 34,399 $6,516 Brooklyn #16 86,468 $27,166 (Brownsville, Ocean Hill) Brooklyn #4 (Bushwick) 92,497 $6,957 Brooklyn #13 (Coney Island) 104,278 $29,712 Brooklyn #5 (East New York) 154,931 $7,086 Brooklyn #5 (East New York) 182,896 $31,986 Manhattan #11 (East Harlem) 114,569 $7,302 Manhattan #11 (East Harlem) 120,511 $31,079 Brooklyn #16 (Brownsville) 73,801 $7,541 Manhattan #10 115,723 $36,112 (Central Harlem) Queens #14 (The Rockaways) 100,592 $12,060 Queens #4 (Elmhurst, Corona) 172,598 $44,412 Queens #1 185,198 $12,757 Queens #3 (Jackson Heights) 171,576 $46,119 (Astoria, Long Island City) Staten Island #1 (Stapleton) 138,489 $17,724 Staten Island #1 (Stapleton) 175,756 $57,283 Source: U.S. Census Bureau; New York City Planning Department Poverty and Progress in New York I 1 POPULATION been virtually unchanged throughout the last 30 years (1980: 20 percent; 1990: 19.3 percent). Since New York City is the only old, former industrial city 1980, some neighborhoods have seen their poverty whose population now stands at its historical peak. rates drop by 9 percentage points or more (East The city lost 800,000 residents in the 1970s, a 10 and Central Harlem, East New York), whereas oth- percent drop, but those losses have been more than ers have seen theirs increase by 9 points (Jackson recouped over the past three decades (Table 2). Heights and Elmhurst in Queens). Since 1970, population trends in New York City’s The record with median household income is poorest neighborhoods have been more exaggerated similarly mixed. Whereas some community dis- than for the city as a whole: there were deeper losses tricts have seen real income increase by half (East during the years of decline; and relatively stronger New York, East Harlem) or nearly double (Cen- gains during the recent decades of revitalization. tral Harlem), two have seen their income decline Over 1980–2010, double-digit gains in a decade since 1980. have been posted in nine instances. All ten of the poorest neighborhoods in the five boroughs have As Table 5 reveals, the neighborhoods that experi- gained population since 1980. enced the largest income increases since 1980 were gentrifying neighborhoods. INCOME AND POVERTY In other words, at least in terms of neighborhoods, Poverty and income metrics among the poorest the last 30 years has not quite been a story of the neighborhoods in the five boroughs vary consider- rich getting richer and poor getting poorer. Al- ably, depending largely on the borough (Tables 3 though the Upper East Side’s median household and 4). The poorest community district in Queens income has increased 58 percent (a figure similar has a median household income twice that of the to East New York’s), measures for Staten Island #3 poorest community district in the Bronx.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System
    Under the Big Apple: a Retrospective of Preservation Practice and the New York City Subway System by Emma Marie Waterloo This thesis/dissertation document has been electronically approved by the following individuals: Tomlan,Michael Andrew (Chairperson) Chusid,Jeffrey M. (Minor Member) UNDER THE BIG APPLE: A RETROSPECTIVE OF PRESERVATION PRACTICE AND THE NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Emma Marie Waterloo August 2010 © 2010 Emma Marie Waterloo ABSTRACT The New York City Subway system is one of the most iconic, most extensive, and most influential train networks in America. In operation for over 100 years, this engineering marvel dictated development patterns in upper Manhattan, Brooklyn, and the Bronx. The interior station designs of the different lines chronicle the changing architectural fashion of the aboveground world from the turn of the century through the 1940s. Many prominent architects have designed the stations over the years, including the earliest stations by Heins and LaFarge. However, the conversation about preservation surrounding the historic resource has only begun in earnest in the past twenty years. It is the system’s very heritage that creates its preservation controversies. After World War II, the rapid transit system suffered from several decades of neglect and deferred maintenance as ridership fell and violent crime rose. At the height of the subway’s degradation in 1979, the decision to celebrate the seventy-fifth anniversary of the opening of the subway with a local landmark designation was unusual.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: Stop and Frisk's Effect on Crime in New York City
    Fact Sheet: Stop and Frisk’s Effect on Crime in New York City By James Cullen and Ames Grawert This fact sheet provides data on the effect of “stop-and-frisk” on crime in New York City, updating an earlier Brennan Center analysis.1 Stop-and-frisk was a police practice under which officers stopped and searched citizens, allegedly without the reasonable suspicion required for these interventions. Concerns about the program first arose under Mayor Rudy Giuliani, during William J. Bratton’s first tenure as police commissioner.2 After growing slowly in the early 2000s, stop-and-frisk began to rapidly increase in 2006, when there were 500,000 stops citywide. By 2011 the number peaked at 685,000. It then began to fall, first to 533,000 stops in 2012. Stop-and-frisk became a central issue in the 2013 city mayoral race because of a concern that the program unconstitutionally targeted communities of color. The program’s supporters disputed this, insisting that stop-and-frisk was essential for fighting crime in such a huge city. In August 2013, federal district court judge Shira Scheindlin found that stop-and-frisk was unconstitutional.3 The stop-and-frisk era formally drew to a close in January 2014, when newly- elected Mayor Bill de Blasio settled the litigation and ended the program. Given this large-scale effort, one might expect crime generally, and murder specifically, to increase as stops tapered off between 2012 and 2014. Instead, as shown below, the murder rate fell while the number of stops declined. In fact, the biggest fall occurred precisely when the number of stops also fell by a large amount — in 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • NYC Weekend Picks | Newsday
    2/21/2020 NYC weekend picks | Newsday TRAVEL NYC weekend picks Updated February 18, 2020 9:41 AM Here are our picks for what to see and do in the city this weekend. Watch puppets challenge the malaise of life Credit: Liz Maney You've got to hand it to The BoxCutter Collective, a puppet troupe that deviates from the typical felt hand creatures. In its latest offering "Everything Is Fine: A Children's Show for Scared Adults Living in a Scary World," the group skewers city life, basic life and paranoia with gut-punch comedy. WHEN | WHERE 8 p.m. Feb. 21, Jalopy Theater, 315 Columbia St., Brooklyn INFO $15; 718-395-3214, jalopytheatre.org Take a cannoli-making workshop Credit: Allison Scola | Experience Sicily Perhaps one of the underrated moments in the life of a New Yorker is that rst time one bites into a cannoli. The Italian pastry's taste is so immediate, yet it's not so easy to make. This session with cannoli connoisseur Allison Scola and Sicilian pastry chef Giusto Priola is intended to give guests the scoop on how to craft these yummies a mano. WHEN | WHERE 1:30 p.m. Feb. 22; Cacio e Vino, 80 Second Ave., Manhattan INFO $75, $45 children; 646-281-4324, experiencesicily.com https://www.newsday.com/travel/nyc-weekend-picks-our-best-bets-for-what-to-do-in-the-city-1.6813771 1/10 2/21/2020 NYC weekend picks | Newsday Big dance, big beats and big hair Credit: Newsday/Rob Rich | SocietyAllure.com While mathematically impossible to prove, this event billed as "New York's Largest Dance Party" can certainly boast lots of reasons to get up and boogie.
    [Show full text]
  • “Unthinkable” a History of Policing in New York City Public Schools & the Path Toward Police-Free Schools
    “Unthinkable” A History of Policing in New York City Public Schools & the Path toward Police-Free Schools Despite being named “unthinkable” by officials in Today, there are 5,322 School Safety Agents and 189 the 1950s, for more than two decades the New York uniformed police officers budgeted for the NYPD’s City Police Department (NYPD) has controlled School Safety Division. Over the last decade advocates policing inside the City’s public schools. Much has have pointed out that our School Safety Division is been written about the 1998 transfer of school safety larger than the police departments of Washington DC, authority from the school system to police under Dallas, Boston, or Las Vegas, and outnumbers the former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, but very little about Department of Education’s staffing of school guidance what accelerated that process or the landscape that counselors and social workers.3 preceded it. These are not the only police in schools. Most police This report provides a condensed political history of activity in schools is carried out by police officers policing and schooling in New York City, and offers a outside of the control of the School Safety Division. For frame for using this history to move forward a future example, in 2018, 74% of all school-based arrests were of police-free schools. This overview collects popular conducted by additional police in and around our reporting since the early 1900s, chronicling the schools – either a Detective from the Detective Bureau shifting of school safety – referring at times to police or a Patrol Officer.4 officers assigned to targeted schools, and at other times to “security aides” employed by the Board of This report also documents the ballooning budget Education (BOE).
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    A Message From Our CEO Dear Friends, up driving parents to exercise their voices. And there’s Erin Einhorn’s series, produced in partnership with Bridge Magazine, about a single I’m so proud of what Chalkbeat accomplished in 2018. middle-school classroom in Detroit that typifies the consequences of the city’s incredibly high student mobility rate (in that single class of 31 We told more and better stories in our communities, and in more students, the group had attended 128 schools among them by the time communities. (Hello, Newark and Chicago!) they reached eighth grade). We launched our first-ever listening tour, working with community And I’ve only named only a few. groups that are often disenfranchised to ask the question, What’s missing from your city’s education story? While we’re proud of what we’ve accomplished, we also know our work is far from complete. There are still too many public meetings We created our first-ever membership program, giving our readers new we can’t attend, too many communities without any education press, ways to help build our community and to engage with our reporting. and too many stories left untold. We have made our business model stronger every year, but we still have more work to do to guarantee our We continued to add “boots on the ground” reporters as other local sustainability long into the future. newsrooms suffered devastating cuts. Our 34-person newsroom produced 2,412 original stories in 2018. And yet 2018 tells us that we are moving in the right direction.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrocard Merchants Manual
    Merchant MetroCard Sales Manual April 2019 ¯˘ MetroCard increases customer traffic to your store. MetroCard Merchant Sales Manual Welcome The rules and procedures governing: • selling • ordering • promotions • payment • delivery • questions • returns Periodic updates will be provided. 3 Selling MetroCard • We will provide you with free advertising materials to display in the front door or window of your business. Additional free promotional materials such as the MTA New York City Subway map and MetroCard menus are available upon request. For your convenience MetroCard menus are currently available in the following languages: English, Spanish, Russian, Creole, Chinese and Korean. • MetroCard customers are MTA New York City Transit customers and should be treated courteously. • MetroCard must be available for sale during all hours and days that your business is open. Merchants must not require customers to purchase other items in order to purchase MetroCard. • MetroCard must not be removed from individual wrappers prior to sale. A customer may refuse to buy any MetroCard with an open or damaged wrapper. • MetroCard may not be sold for more than face value or the dollar value listed on the wrapper. • Merchants are not permitted to charge fees or premiums, including the $1.00 NEW card fee. • MetroCard should not be sold within 30 days of the expiration date printed on the back of the card. • To return a supply of current MetroCard for credit, see return procedure beginning on page 12 or call the MetroCard Merchant Service Center at 888-345-3882. • NYC Transit reserves the right to limit the number of MetroCards sold to a merchant.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality-Of-Life-Report-2010-2015.Pdf
    An Analysis of Quality-of-Life Summonses, Quality-of-Life Misdemeanor Arrests, and Felony Crime in New York City, 2010-2015 New York City Department of Investigation Office of the Inspector General for the NYPD (OIG-NYPD) Mark G. Peters Commissioner Philip K. Eure Inspector General for the NYPD June 22, 2016 AN ANALYSIS OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE SUMMONSES, QUALITY-OF-LIFE MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS, JUNE 2016 AND FELONY CRIME IN NEW YORK CITY, 2010-2015 Table of Contents I. Executive Summary 2 II. Introduction 8 III. Analysis 11 A. Methodology: Data Collection, Sources, and Preliminary Analysis 11 B. Quality-of-Life Enforcement and Crime in New York City Today 16 1. Correlation Analysis: The Connection between Quality-of-Life Enforcement and Demographic Factors 35 2. Correlation Findings 37 C. Trend Analysis: Six-Year Trends of Quality-of-Life Enforcement and Crime 45 1. Preparing the Data 45 2. Distribution of Quality-of-Life Summonses in New York City, 2010-2015 46 3. Correlations between Quality-of-Life Enforcement and Felony Crime in New York City 60 IV. Recommendations 72 Appendices 76 Technical Endnotes 83 * Note to the Reader: Technical Endnotes are indicated by Roman numerals throughout the Report. 1 AN ANALYSIS OF QUALITY-OF-LIFE SUMMONSES, QUALITY-OF-LIFE MISDEMEANOR ARRESTS, JUNE 2016 AND FELONY CRIME IN NEW YORK CITY, 2010-2015 I. Executive Summary Between 2010 and 2015, the New York City Police Department (NYPD) issued 1,839,414 “quality-of-life” summonses for offenses such as public urination, disorderly conduct, drinking alcohol in public, and possession of small amounts of marijuana.
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Takedowns in the De Blasio Era
    GANG TAKEDOWNS IN The Dangers of THE DE BLASIO ERA: ‘Precision Policing’ By JOSMAR TRUJILLO and ALEX S. VITALE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. About & Acknowledgement . 1 2. Introduction . 2. 3. Gang Raids . .4 4. Database . 6 5. SIDEBAR: Inventing gangs . .11 6. Consequences of Gang Labeling . 13 i. Harassment, Hyper-Policing ii. Enhanced Bail iii. Indictments, Trials & Plea Deals iii. Employment Issues iv. Housing v. Deportation Risks 7. SIDEBAR: School Policing . 21 8. Focused Deterrence . 22 9. Prosecutor profile: Cyrus Vance Jr. 24 10. Action spotlight: Legal Aid’s FOIL Campaign . 28 11. Conclusion/Recommendations. 29 2019 New York City Gang Policing Report | 3 ABOUT THE POLICING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SOCIAL JUSTICE PROJECT This report was compiled and edited by Josmar Trujillo AT BROOKLYN COLLEGE and Professor Alex Vitale from The Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn College. Additional research The Policing and Social Justice Project at Brooklyn support was provided by Amy Martinez. College is an effort of faculty, students and community researchers that offers support in dismantling harmful Insights from interviews of people directly impacted policing practices. Over the past three years, the by gang policing, including public housing residents, Project has helped to support actions, convenings, inspired and spearheaded this report. In many and community events to drive public education ways, this report is a reflection of the brave voices of and advocacy against the New York City Police community members and family members including Department’s gang policing tactics, including its so- Taylonn Murphy Sr., Darlene Murray, Diane Pippen, called gang database. Shaniqua Williams, Afrika Owes, Kraig Lewis, mothers from the Bronx120 case, and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moments That Matter Annual Report: July 2012–June 2013 BOARD of TRUSTEES Honorary Board
    The MoMenTs ThaT MaTTer annual reporT: July 2012–June 2013 BOARD oF TrusTees honorary BoarD Herb Scannell, Chair* Kate D. Levin, ex officio Peter H. Darrow President, BBc WorldWide america commissioner, neW york city dePartment senior counsel, oF cultural aFFairs cleary gottlieB steen & hamilton, llP Cynthia King Vance, Vice Chair*, Chair† advanced strategies, LLC Anton J. Levy Eduardo G. Mestre managing director, chairman, gloBal advisory, Alexander Kaplen, Vice Chair* general atlantic LLC evercore Partners executive, time Warner Joanne B. Matthews Thomas B. Morgan John S. Rose, Vice Chair† PhilanthroPist senior Partner and managing director, Lulu C. Wang the Boston consulting grouP Bethany Millard ceo, tuPelo caPital management, LLC PhilanthroPist Susan Rebell Solomon, Vice Chair† retired Partner, Richard A. Pace neW YORK puBlIC raDIo senIor sTaFF mercer management consulting executive vice President, Bank oF neW york mellon, retired Laura R. Walker Mayo Stuntz, Vice Chair† President and ceo memBer, Pilot grouP Ellen Polaner Dean Cappello Howard S. Stein, Treasurer Jonelle Procope chieF content oFFicer managing director, gloBal corPorate President and ceo, and senior vice President and investment Bank, citigrouP, retired aPollo theater Foundation Thomas Bartunek Alan G. Weiler, Secretary Jon W. Rotenstreich vice President, PrinciPal, managing Partner, Planning and sPecial ProJects Weiler arnoW management co., inc. rotenstreich Family Partners Thomas Hjelm Laura R. Walker, President and CEO Joshua Sapan chieF digital oFFicer and vice President, neW york PuBlic radio President and ceo, amc netWorks Business develoPment Jean B. Angell Lauren Seikaly Margaret Hunt retired Partner and memBer, Private theater Producer and actress vice President, develoPment client service grouP, Bryan cave Peter Shapiro Noreen O’Loughlin Tom A.
    [Show full text]
  • December 14, 2020 Mayor Bill De Blasio City Hall New York, NY
    STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LETITIA JAMES ATTORNEY GENERAL December 14, 2020 Mayor Bill de Blasio City Hall New York, NY 10007 NYC Council Speak Corey Johnson City Hall Office New York, NY 10007 Dear Mayor de Blasio and Council Speaker Johnson: I am writing today about the need for major reform in the way New York City conducts its annual tax lien sale. Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, I have repeatedly called on the City to delay the tax lien sale and to remove small homes from the lien sale list, at least until the end of the pandemic emergency. Since then, the Governor issued a series of executive orders suspending the City’s authority to sell tax liens, a decision that I strongly supported. The decision to delay the 2020 New York City lien sale was a lifeline for struggling homeowners who fell behind on their tax and water bills. At a time of escalating unemployment and food insecurity, delaying the sale saved thousands of families from further anguish and anxiety, and prevented the continued destabilization of neighborhoods that are battling the health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The delay was also effective in allowing thousands of property owners to enter into payment plans with the City and thus be removed from the lien sale list. The 2020 lien sale list now includes fewer properties than any year in recent memory, which is a great a success. I thank you both, along with councilmembers and administration staff, for working so hard to reach homeowners at this difficult time.
    [Show full text]
  • New Strategies for Combatting Crime in New York City William J
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 23 | Number 3 Article 8 1996 New Strategies for Combatting Crime in New York City William J. Bratton New York Police Department Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation William J. Bratton, New Strategies for Combatting Crime in New York City, 23 Fordham Urb. L.J. 781 (1996). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol23/iss3/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. New Strategies for Combatting Crime in New York City Cover Page Footnote None. This article is available in Fordham Urban Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol23/iss3/8 NEW STRATEGIES FOR COMBATING CRIME IN NEW YORK CITY William J. Bratton* Good evening, Thank You. It is a real pleasure to be here with you this evening to talk about something that I spend a lot of time thinking about: how to make the City of New York a safer place. This evening's presentation, I hope, will be informative. Before talking about why crime is down in New York City, and the national debate that is currently underway as to why it is down in New York and many other areas around the country, I think it is important to take a walk back through time to understand how we got to this point in time.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON, D. C.: Essays on the City Form of a Capital
    WASHINGTON, D. C.: Essays on the City Form of a Capital by George Kousoulas Bachelor of Architecture University of Miami Coral Gables, Florida 1982 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEGREE MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE STUDIES AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JUNE, 1985 @ George Kousoulas 1985 The Author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly copies of this thesis document in whole or in part Signature of the autho . eorgeG osua rtment of Architecture May 10, 1985 Certified by Julian Beinart Professor of Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted by I I ~ I ~ D..~i- \j WWJuChairmanlia ear Departmental Committee for Graduate Students JUN 0 31985 1 otCtj 2 WASHINGTON, D.C.: Essays on the City Form of a Capital by George Kousoulas Submitted to the Department of Architecture on May 10, 1985 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Architecture Studies ABSTRACT This thesis is an exploration of the city form of Washington, D.C. through four independent essays. Each essay examines a different aspect of the city: its monumentality as determined by its relationship with the nation it governs, the linear network of its plan, the 'objectness' of its principal buildings, and finally, the signifigance of nature. Their structure and the manner in which they view the city are tailored to their respective topics. Together they represent a body of work whose intent is to explore those issues which distinguish Washington. The premise for this approach is a belief that cities should be understood for what they are, not only for what they are like or what they are not.
    [Show full text]