<<

MICHAEL SERVETUS, AND HERETIC*

By GEORGE A. WILLIAMS, M.D.

ATLANTA, GA.

ICHAEL Servetus, through the tant member of the Emperor’s retinue that vagaries of fortune known also he witnessed what was to him the degrading as Michel Villeneuve, Michael spectacle of the most powerful monarch of Villanovanus, and as he once his time, at the head of twenty thousand styled himself, alias Reves, was bornveterans, at prostrating himself in the dust to MVillaneuva in the province of ,kiss the foot of the Pope. No less disgusting . The year of his birth is uncertain, to the youthful observer was the thriving being given by Servetus himself on occa- sale of indulgences by the clergy, an impor- sions as both 1509 and 1511, but suffice it to tant feature of every festival. Servetus was say that the tremendous force of the also present at the Diet of Augsburg where had already begun to stir the he came into intimate contact with leaders thought of man, long stagnant in the of the , one author even mak- worship of ancient masters. At the trial ing him visit Luther in the neighboring city in he described his parents as being of Coburg. of an ancient race, living nobly, and that his It is not clear when and why Servetus father was a notary by profession. This left the service of Quintana, but he is next precludes the supposition, based largely found in Basle, corresponding on theologi- upon his spirit of tolerance, that he was of cal subjects with various Swiss Reformers. Jewish or Moorish parentage, or both. This led to the publication of his first book, The Church of that day appealed most “De Trinitatis Erroribus,” or “Concerning strongly to the ambitious as the direct path the Errors of the .” The title page to influence and affluence so it is quite also bore the legend, “By Michael Servetus, probable that the childhood training of alias Reves, of Aragon, Spain.” The printer Servetus at a neighboring convent was and publisher, probably discerning the directed toward the priesthood. At the age coming storm, did not grace the page with of fourteen he entered the University of their names. The volume was immediately Saragossa, the most famous in Spain, where scathingly denounced as and blas- we are told he became proficient not only in phemy, and Bucer, Oecolampadius, Zwingli but also in Greek and Hebrew. After and other leaders of the Reformation were four or five years, having definitely decided quick to disclaim all responsibility for it or against the clergy and probably with the its author. “De Trinitatis Erroribus” dealt hereditary vocation of his family in view, largely with the conception of the Holy he entered , the most noted law Trinity, which among other doctrines the school of the day. He had not yet found Reformers had retained after their revolt himself but it is significant that here he from Rome. This consisted of the existence made his first acquaintance with the scrip- of an inseparable and indivisible Godhead of tures of the Old and New Testaments. three persons; God, the Father, Christ, the Leaving school after two years, Servetus , and the Holy Ghost. According next entered the service of Juan Quintana, to the accepted dogma, Christ was the a liberal Franciscan friar, confessor to the eternal Son of God, having existed since all Emperor Charles v. It was as an unimpor- time as the transcendental Word of God. * Read before the Emory Medical History Club, Servetus did not deny the Trinity and was Atlanta, September 17, 1927. not a martyr to the Unitarian confession as is thought by some. In “De Trinitatis recorded medical observation of this pioneer Erroribus” he states as his belief, “I con- physiologist, “I have myself often seen the cede one person of the Father, another King touching many suffering from the person of the Son, another person of the disease (scrofula) but I did not see that any Holy Ghost; three persons in one God, and were cured.” At Lyons, Villeneuve became this is the true Trinity.” This seems ortho- the friend and associate of Symphorien dox enough, but person, he contended, as Champier, a distinguished physician of his derived from the Greek irpocuirov, or the time. Both being students of , Latin persona, means a mask, a symbol, an Villeneuve did not hesitate to defend his appearance, and never any real person or friend against Leonard Fuchs, professor of thing. To Servetus, Christ became the Son at Heidelberg, in a controversy of God on his conception by the Virgin on the subject. Mary and had not preexisted as the Word of The bitterness of his quarrels with the God as recorded in St. John. His conception Reformers had perhaps discouraged him as a of the Holy Spirit is by no means so clear doctrinal critic, so Villeneuve is next seen but it seems that he regarded both the Son again in , this time as a medical and the Holy Ghost as manifestations of student under the great Jacobus Sylvius God and not as equal persons of the God- and Johann Guinther, and a fellow prosec- head. “All Trinitarian errors,” he concludes, tor with . As Servetus had “have arisen from not understanding the freed himself of the bonds of orthodox true nature of the Incarnation.” ,- so Villeneuve and Vesalius threw The youthful critic was bitterly dis- off the shackles with which had appointed at the hostile reception of his bound medical science for thirteen centuries, views, and, living in an age when conflict one instituting practical , while with authority often led to the stake, he the other became the father of modern conveniently disappeared from Basle. His . It is striking that the bigotry of retreat was not, however, without a parting their time claimed both men as victims, shot at his adversaries, for from Hagenau a Vesalius perishing in a shipwreck off the few months later he published his “Dialogi Island of Crete whence he was returning de Trinitate,” a reaffirmation of his views from a pilgrimage to Jerusalem in an en- and an attempt to clarify them. forced penance for his zeal in dissection. Leaving Protestant for At the age of twenty-six or twenty-nine, Catholic France, Michael Servetus became Villeneuve published his only medical book, M. Michel Villeneuve; in Latin, Michael an unimportant treatise on syrups and their Villanovanus; not of Aragon in Spain but, uses. In this work, however, he mentions for obvious reasons, from the former French originating in the mesentery, a distinct province of Navarre. He studied mathe- advance over the Galenian doctrine that the matics and physics in Paris where, as a liver was the source of all these vessels. fellow student, he met Calvin, discussed What he considered a much more important theology with him, and first incurred the publication was his “ Apologetica pro Astrol- enmity which was so all important in his ogia,” a defense of his lectures on astrology destiny. After two years Villeneuve is found for which he was taken to task by the Paris in literary occupations successively at faculty of medicine. Soon after his repri- Orleans, Avignon, and finally at Lyons. mand by that august body Villeneuve Here he found employment as a proof began the practice of medicine at Charlieu, reader and editor. An important work a small town near Lyons. An abhorrer of embellished with his notes was a handsome , he was baptized privately edition of “’s .” Among here at the age of thirty, at which age one the notations thereon is found the first had reached the capacity to reason and could have faith. To Villeneuve this was a faith. Although Calvin did not condescend prerequisite to the sacrament and for a to comment upon such a blasphemous effort, precedent he pointed to Christ himself, who, he never returned the manuscript but at a though circumcised as an infant, was not later day furnished it to the Papal Inquisitor baptized until His thirtieth year. at Vienne for the prosecution of its author, Soon leaving Charlieu for Vienne, a his friend, for heresy. larger town in Dauphiny, Villeneuve began The immediate cause of the prosecution to practice there under the patronage of the at Vienne was the printing, in private, of Archbishop, Pierre Parmier, to whom he five hundred bales of “Christianismi Resti- had lectured in Paris. His time not yet being tutio” in that city. Villeneuve remembered fully occupied with his practice, he again the bitter experience of Servetus with “De engaged in editorial work, including another Trinitatis Erroribus” and the title page edition of “Ptolemy’s Geography” and one bore neither his name nor that of the of the famed “Pagnini’s .” As an printer. It was signed with the initials expositor of the latter he again established “M. S. V.” and in the preface he unwit- contact with the theological strife of the tingly says that he had previously treated of day. Through John Frelon, a publisher of the subject to be discussed. Michael and Lyons, he began a correspondence with Peter, too, are the interlocutors in one of Calvin, in Geneva, on vital questions of the dialogues as indeed they were in his old Christian doctrine. The controversy grad- “Dialogi de Trinitate.” When the first ually assumed such a degree of bitterness copy of the printed book found its way into that the supply of invectives of both advo- the hands of Calvin at Geneva he imme- cates was severely taxed. Although Vil- diately recognized “M. S. V.” as Michael leneuve had in the meantime become a Servetus Viffanovanus, alias Michel Vil- successful practitioner of medicine he seems leneuve, the physician, and denounced him never to have given up his life’s ambition, to the ecclesiastical authorities of Vienne. the restoration of Christianity to what he This was cleverly accomplished through the considered its purity of form before it medium of a controversial correspondence assumed the accretions of the various between two cousins, one a convert of Church Councils. In the course of their Calvin’s at Geneva and the other a Catholic correspondence Calvin sent to Villeneuve a at Vienne. At Calvin’s instigation, the copy of his “ Institutiones Religionis Chris- Protestant strictured his relative for harbor- tiani.” This was returned to its author ing such a heretic as Villeneuve in his native copiously annotated on the margins, with city, the recipient of the missive turning it the result that the enraged Calvin wrote over to the Papal authorities. Calvin, at his terribly compromising letter to Farel, their request, supplied documentary evi- “I will not pledge my faith to him; for did dence, including confidential correspond- he come, if I should have any authority ence from Villeneuve. Although the here, I should never suffer him to go away Viennese clerics must have laughed at the alive.” spectacle of one heretic accusing another, Servetus had long been preparing a vol- they immediately began proceedings which ume which he hoped would do much to resulted in the arrest of the physician on a restore Christianity to the simple faith of charge of blasphemy and heresy. He was the early Church. A manuscript of this allowed by influential friends to escape “Christianismi Restitutio,” or “Restora- from prison but, after his flight, was tried tion of Christianity,” he sent to Calvin for and condemned to the stake. In his absence his opinion. The work dealt largely with the the fugitive was burned in effigy with five author’s views on the Trinity, infant bap- bales of his books on April seventh, 1553. tism, and the doctrine of justification by Why, of all places, Servetus should have gone to Geneva and into the hands of his The death march at once formed; Farel, a arch enemy, Calvin, it is difficult to explain. local Calvinist minister, accompanying the The Genevese opponents of Calvin hoped condemned man in the procession and soon to wrest control from their spiritual repeatedly urging him to recant. dictator, and it is supposed that discovery of When he reached the site of his execution such intentions led Servetus to submit Servetus again prostrated himself in prayer. himself as a pawn in the political game of Arising, he was chained to the stake with the theocratic republic. At any rate, he two of his books fastened to his waist; one was arrested at Calvin’s instigation four in manuscript, previously sent to Calvin, weeks after he entered the city and was at and the other lately printed, the direct once charged with the capital offense of cause of his unhappy fate. A chaplet of heresy and blasphemy. green twigs, dipped in sulphur, surmounted The trial rocked on for two long months his brow. As the leaping flames reached his and divided Geneva into two hostile camps. face and ignited the sulphur, a single cry Personal animosity was demonstrated by of anguish was extorted from their victim. Calvin in the injection of irrelevant material The faggots, purposely green, burned slowly into the trial. Among other things, because and Servetus suffered in silence for a long of his celibacy, Servetus was charged with half hour until with an expiring breath he immorality. At times it seemed that Calvin gasped aloud, “Jesu, Thou Son of the was as much on trial as his opponent, who eternal God, have compassion upon me.” countercharged him with treachery, viola- As Osler has remarked, could he have only tion of confidence, connivance with the cried, “Jesu, Thou eternal Son of God,” Papists of Vienne for his death, and with even his chains might have been loosed and false imprisonment in that Geneva had no the flaming embers scattered. jurisdiction over him. Servetus was firm in So thoroughly were his works suppressed his adherence to his convictions, how- by Catholic and Reformer alike that it ever. Toward the middle of October public was not until one hundred and forty years opinion, veered to the side of Calvin, forcing after the death of Servetus that the world the council to declare the prisoner guilty. became acquainted with his conception of Servetus, a peculiar combination of au- the circulation. Willis translates from the dacity and guilelessness, seemed never to fifth book of “Christianismi Restitutio” as have considered such a termination of the follows: trial. He sent for Calvin and begged his The vital spirit has its source in the left pardon, but the Reformer remained ada- of the , the lungs aiding most mant in his attitude that such a blasphemer essentially in its production. It is a fine, attenu- was beyond the pale of mercy. ated spirit, elaborated by the power of heat, of a Near noon of the same day, October crimson color and a fiery potency, the lucid twenty-seventh, 1553, Servetus was led vapor as it were of the blood, composed sub- from his cell to receive his sentence of death stantially of air, water and fire; for it is engen- at the stake by a slow fire. The Spaniard dered by the mingling with inspired air of the fell in supplication, asking, not for mercy, more subtle portion of the blood which the right ventricle of the heart communicates to the but for a less horrible form of execution. left. This communication, however, does not He was afraid, he confessed, that the intense take place through the septum, partition, or agony of his suffering might cause him to be midwall of the heart, as is commonly believed, faithless to himself and to belie the convic- but by another admirable contrivance, the tions of his life. His plea refused, he arose blood being transmitted from the pulmonary from his knees and exclaimed in his native artery to the pulmonary by a lengthened tongue, “O, God, save my soul; O Jesu, son passage through the lungs, in the course of of the eternal God, have mercy upon me.” which it is elaborated and becomes of a crimson color. Mingled with the inspired air in this these is in the Bibliotheque Nationale, in passage and freed from fuliginous vapors by the Paris, and another lies in the Royal and act of expiration, the mixture now being com- Imperial Library of Vienna. An incomplete plete in every respect and the blood becomes a copy, with the first sixteen pages in manu- fit dwelling place of the vital spirit, it is finally script may be found at the University attracted by diastole and reaches the left ven- Library of Edinburgh. tricle of the heart. The Paris copy passed from the collection Now that the communication and elaboration takes place in the lungs in the manner described, of the Landgrave of Hesse into the hands of we are assured by the conjunctions and com- Dr. Richard Mead, of London, who under- munications of the pulmonary artery with the took to have it printed in 1723 but while pulmonary vein. The great size of the pulmon- yet incomplete it was suppressed by the ary artery itself seems to declare how the matter Bishop of London. Osler in 1910 was able stands; for the vessel would neither have been to find but three copies of this incomplete of such a size nor would such a force of the reprint; two in the British Museum, and purest blood have been sent to the lungs for another in the National Library of France. their nutrition only; neither would the heart Dr. Mead, to preserve the original from the have supplied the lungs in such a fashion, seeing Bishop’s zeal, exchanged it with a member as we do that the lungs in the foetus are nour- of the French Academy of Fine Arts. On ished from another source, the membranes and the title page is found the name, “Germain valves of the heart not coming into play until CoIIadon,” the barrister who prosecuted the hour of birth, as Galen teaches. Conse- quently at the birth of the child the blood must Servetus at Geneva. Stains upon some por- be poured from the heart to the lungs for an- tions of the book, pronounced by experts to other purpose than the nourishment of those be due to scorching, seem to indicate this organs. Moreover, it is not simply air, but air was the very copy used as evidence against mingled with blood that is returned from the its author and chained with him to the lungs to the heart through the pulmonary vein. stake. It may be supposed that some zealous It is in the lungs that the mixture of blood Calvinist rescued it from the stake and pre- with inspired air takes place and it is in the served it as a memento of such a great lungs also, not in the heart, that the crimson accomplishment for the glory of the Lord. color of the blood is acquired. There is not The Vienna copy was first brought to indeed capacity enough in the left ventricle for light as the possession of a Unitarian of so great and important an elaboration, neither , resident in London, who on does it seem competent to produce the crimson return to his native land presented it to the color. To conclude, the septum, or middle por- congregation of Claudiopolis, of which he tion of the heart, seeing that it is without ves- sels and special properties, is not competent to was a member. It was given by them to permit and accomplish the communication and Count Tekeli de Izek in return for some elaboration in question, although it may be courtesy rendered by that personage. The that some transudation occurs through it. It is Count, apprised of the value of the gift, by a mechanism similar to that by which trans- presented the copy to his sovereign, the fusion from the vena porta to the vena cava Emperor Joseph 11, who placed it in its takes place in the liver, in respect to the blood, present home. The Austrian authorities that the communication from the pulmonary permitted Dr. de Murr of Vienna to publish artery to the pulmonary vein takes place in the a facsimile reprint in 1791, such a counter- lungs with respect to the vital spirit. part of the original, indeed, that the date in As a monument to the zeal of bigotry minute type at the bottom of the final page, “Christianismi Restitutio” is among the alone distinguishes it as spurious. This rarest of the world’s rare books. Of the edition, being quite limited, is itself now edition of two thousand printed at Vienne very rare. only two complete copies survive. One of A physician, theologian and scholar, far in advance of his time, a vital actor in the science as he had so fondly hoped to great rebirth of learning, it is hardly as any accomplish for the souls of men. of these that Servetus appeals to us most strongly. His loyalty to his convictions and Biblio gra phy the pathos of his fate have probably done Bruce , J. Michel Servede: A forerunner of William more than all else to enhance his memory. Harvey. Edinb. M. J., 1905, xviii, 250. Cum sto n , C. G. Michael Servetus, the discoverer To us, his description of the pulmonary of the ; to which is circulation seventy years before Harvey appended the text of this discovery followed perhaps seems to be the most remarkable by an English of the same with contribution of his life. To Servetus, how- notes. Bost. M. & S. J., 1907, clvi, 451. ever, this was of so little import as compared Mackal l , L. Contributions to Medical and Biolog- ical Research. Hoeber, N. Y. 1919, 11, 767. to his theological convictions that he pub- Osler , W. Michael Servetus. Johns Hopkins Hosp. lished it only as an illustration to clarify a Bull. 1910; xxi, 1. controversial point. Of how much benefit Stir ling , W. Some Apostles of Physiology. Water- might have been his life had he confined low and Son., Lond. 1902, iv, 129. himself to his chosen profession, we can only Toll in , H. Luther und Servet, eine Quellinstudie. conjecture. Unencumbered by the religious Berk, 1875. (Quoted by Willis.) Ward , A. An Impartial Hist, of Michael Servetus. turmoil which removed him from the stage Lond., 1724. in his early forties, his keen intellect might Willis , R. Servetus and Calvin. King & Co., Lond., have achieved as much for the world of 1877.