DOCSLIB.ORG

California Homeless Bill of Rights

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Homeless Bill of Rights Jesse Arreguín Councilmember, District 4 CONSENT CALENDAR July 24, 2012 To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Councilmember Jesse Arreguin Subject: California Homeless Bill of Rights RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution urging the California Legislature to adopt the California Homeless Bill of Rights, which, among various things, establishes that no person should suffer unfair discrimination based on their homeless status. BACKGROUND: Being homeless in California does not deny a person basic rights, access to necessary services or fair treatment in the workplace or polling place. The “Homeless Bill of Rights” will guarantee that no person’s rights, privileges or access to public services will be denied or abridged solely because he or she is homeless. Late last month, the State of Rhode Island passed a first-of-its-kind Homeless Bill of Rights,” signed Governor Lincoln Chafee, a former Republican who now identifies as Independent. Last week, the California Legislature passed a much needed Homeowners Bill of rights; the next logical step is to ensure the rights of those without a home. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS: None. CONTACT PERSONS: Councilmember Jesse Arreguin, District 4 981-7140 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Text of California Homeless Bill of Rights 3. “Rhode Island Homeless Bill of Rights Praised As US Model,” Huffington Post 4. “R.I. Gov. Chafee Signs First-In-Nation Homeless Bill of Rights,” Providence Journal 2180 Milvia Street, 5th Floor, Berkeley, CA 94704 ● Tel: (510) 981-7140 ● TDD: (510) 981-6903 ● Fax: (510) 981-7144 E-Mail: [email protected] RESOLUTION NO. URGING THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE TO ADOPT THE CALIFORNIA HOMELESS BILL OF RIGHTS TO ENSURE THAT BASIC RIGHTS ARE GUARANTEED TO HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS WHEREAS, the most recent available data estimates that there 649,917 people experiencing homelessness in the U.S. on any given night and that more than 1.59 million people spent a least one night in emergency shelter or transitional housing over the last year; and WHEREAS, the current economic recession and foreclosure crisis exacerbate the problem of homelessness and that the number of homeless individuals is projected to increase by %2 over the next year as the lingering effects of the recession and constant budget cuts continue to aggravate deep poverty levels; and WHEREAS, adequate and permanent shelter is a basic need, and its absence has a deleterious effect upon physical and mental health, personal development, and the ability to exercise individual rights and obligations; and WHEREAS, groups who have historically been discriminated against, such as ethnic minorities, persons with mental illness, women, children and youth, have been disproportionately affected by the lack of affordable and suitable housing; and WHEREAS, no person should be deprived of a decent quality of life, suffer unnecessarily, or be subject to unfair discrimination based on their homeless status; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Berkeley that we can end homelessness by increasing access to affordable permanent housing, efforts to ensure jobs pay a living wage, adequate support for those who cannot work, appropriate facilities and services for persons with substance abuse and mental illness, access to affordable health care, access to quality educational opportunities, outreach and crisis assistance and transitional housing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that it hereby supports the California Homeless Bill of Rights and urges the California Legislature to adopt the Bill of Rights to ensure that those without a home can enjoy the same rights afford to all others and that copies of this resolution and the California Homeless Bill of Rights shall be sent to Senator pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, Senators Loni Hancock, Assembly Speaker John A. Pérez, and Assemblymember Nancy Skinner. Attachment 2 An act to add Chapter 10 Section 13000 to the Government Code within PART 2.8. DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING relating to homeless persons and housing status. This act shall be known and may be cited as the “Homeless Bill of Rights.” Legislative intent. – (1) At the present time, many persons have been rendered homeless as a result of economic hardship, a severe shortage of safe, affordable housing, and a shrinking social safety net. (2) Article 1, Section 1 of the California State Constitution states in part, “All people are by nature free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing, and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety, happiness, and privacy.” (3) All laws, therefore, should be made for the good of the whole; and the burdens of the state ought to be fairly distributed among its citizens. (4) Article 1 SEC. 7. (a) of the California State Constitution states in part, “A person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law or denied equal protection of the laws;” (5) Concordant with this fundamental belief, no person should suffer unnecessarily or be subject to unfair discrimination based on their homeless status. It is the intent of this act to ameliorate the adverse effects visited upon individuals and our communities when the state’s residents lack a home. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. CHAPTER 10 Section 13000 is added to PART 2.8. DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING of the Government Code to read: CHAPTER 10. HOMELESS BILL OF RIGHTS SECTION 13000. (a) The People of the State of California find and declare all of the following: (1) In the State of California hereinafter referred to as the state, many people are denied: (A) Housing due to their housing status of being homeless, living in a shelter, a vehicle, the street and or the public domain; (B) Employment due to their current housing status of being homeless, living in a shelter, a vehicle the street; (C) Housing and Employment and as a result of not having a fixed or residential mailing address or having a post office box as a mailing address; (D) Equal protection of the laws and Due Process by law enforcement and prosecuting agencies; (E) The ability to make certain purchases or enter certain contests as a result of not having a fixed or residential mailing address or having a post office box as a mailing addres. (2) Homeless persons are unfairly targeted by law enforcement often resulting in the violation of the homeless persons’ Constitutional Rights. Lacking the resources homeless persons are often denied relief of damages through the courts. (3) Homeless persons are forced to flee specific districts due to local legislation that places burdens upon the homeless, burdens that are not incurred by housed residents. This segregation is contrary to the United States Constitution and the landmark decision of Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka - 347 U.S. 483 (1954). These segregation policies unfairly subject municipalities to an increased burden of caring for the homeless who have migrated there from their chosen home municipality in relief of the oppressive legislation. These practices tend unjustly to condemn large groups of inhabitants to dwell in segregated districts or under depressed living conditions which results in crowded, unsanitary, substandard, and unhealthful accommodations. These conditions breed intergroup tension as well as vice, disease, and crime; endanger the public health; jeopardize the public safety, general welfare and good order of the district and municipality accommodating refugee homeless which results in substantial burdens on the public revenues of those districts forced to accommodate the refugee homeless due to the neighboring districts’ and municipalities’ vexatious, oppressive and burdensome ordinances that affect the homeless without affecting the housed which is innately discriminatory. (4) Homeless persons are often provided accommodations and shelter by private and or public service providers that jeopardize their health, physical and mental safety. (b) Bill of Rights No person’s rights, privileges, or access to public services may be denied or abridged solely because he or she is homeless. Such a person shall be granted the same rights and privileges as any other resident of this state. A Homeless Person: (1) Has the right to use and move freely in public spaces, including but not limited to public sidewalks, public parks, public transportation, public streets and public buildings, in the same manner as any other person, and without discrimination on the basis of his or her housing status; (2) Has the right to equal treatment by all law enforcement agencies, without discrimination on the basis of housing status, including the right to be free from searches or detention based upon his or her actual or perceived housing status; (3) Has the right not to face discrimination while seeking or maintaining employment due to his or her condition of being homeless; (4) Has the right not to face discrimination while seeking or maintaining employment due to his or her lack of permanent mailing address, or his or her mailing address being that of a shelter, or his or her mailing address being that of a post office box or social service provider; (5) Has the right not to face discrimination while seeking or maintaining housing due to his or her condition of being homeless; (6) Has the right not to face discrimination while seeking or maintaining housing due to his or her lack of permanent mailing address, or his or her mailing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • August 2017 Dear Supporters and Endorsers of the Follow on Social Media Housing Not Handcuffs Campaign
    August 2017 Dear Supporters and Endorsers of the Follow on social media Housing Not Handcuffs campaign, #HNHNow Our campaign continues to grow, over 500 endorsements, including from NYC Council Member If you have submissions for Stephen Levin and Vancouver City Council Member the next newsletter, send Ty Stober. Keep encouraging your friends, them to [email protected] colleagues, and elected officals to endorse! by September 13. Campaign Updates Local Santa Ana, CA Sued for Sweeps of Homeless Encampments A Southern California legal team, including HNH Campaign participants Carol Sobel and the Elder Law & Disability Rights Center, filed a complaint against the City of Santa Ana and a Joint Powers entity with Orange County over civil rights violations. Those trying to survive on the streets have been hit with citations and threatened with arrest by police, had property seized without notice and stored improperly or destroyed, and have been forced to move to an unsafe space. Washington, DC Introduces Homelessness as a Protected Class D.C. Councilmember David Grosso (working together with NCH, NLCHP, SOME, and People for Fairness Coalition) introduced the Michael A. Stoops Amendment to include homelessness as a protected class in the DC Human Rights Act. Osceola County, FL Criminalizes Street Survival Osceola County has enacted a regressive law to criminalize street survival. Setting up temporary habitation is now punishable by up to a $500 fine and 60 days in jail. Sarasota, FL Settles Lawsuit with ACLU Criminalization took a hit with the settlement of a lawsuit between the ACLU and the City of Sarasota. The city agreed to provide beds rather than mats on the floor and has contracted the Salvation Army to connect those who are unhoused with resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Homelessness Laws
    The Forum September 2020 Is a House Always a Home?: A Survey of Homelessness Laws Marlei English J.D. Candidate, SMU Dedman School of Law, 2021; Staff Editor for the International Law Review Association Find this and additional student articles at: https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/forum/ Recommended Citation Marlei English, Is a House Always a Home?: A Survey of Homelessness Laws (2020) https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/forum/. This article is brought to you for free and open access by The Forum which is published by student editors on The International Law Review Association in conjunction with the SMU Dedman School of Law. For more information, please visit: https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/. Is a House Always a Home?: A Survey of Homelessness Laws By: Marlei English1 March 6, 2020 Homelessness is a plague that spares no country, yet not a single country has cured it. The type of legislation regarding homelessness in a country seems to correlate with the severity of its homelessness problem. The highly-variative approaches taken by each country when passing their legislation can be roughly divided into two categories: aid-based laws and criminalization laws. Analyzing how these homelessness laws affect the homeless community in each country can be an important step in understanding what can truly lead to finding the “cure” for homelessness rather than just applying temporary fixes. I. Introduction to the Homelessness Problem Homelessness is not a new issue, but it is a current, and pressing issue.2 In fact, it is estimated that at least 150 million individuals are homeless.3 That is about two percent of the population on Earth.4 Furthermore, an even larger 1.6 billion individuals may be living without adequate housing.5 While these statistics are startling, the actual number of individuals living without a home could be even larger because these are just the reported and observable numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • A Homeless Bill of Rights As a New Instrument to Protect the Rights of Homeless Persons
    601 A Homeless Bill of Rights as a New Instrument to Protect the Rights of Homeless Persons Adam Ploszka* Homelessness as a violation of human rights – Criminalisation of homelessness – Insufficient international and European protection of the rights of homeless persons – American charters of the rights of homeless persons as a source of inspiration – Model European Homeless Bill of Rights – FEANTSA – Human rights instrument – Positive and negative rights of the homeless person – Right to exit homelessness – Right to carry out practices necessary to survival within the law – Adoption and implementation of the Charter by Human Rights Cities in Spain, Slovenia and Poland – Soft law – Perspectives for the protection of the rights of homeless persons I There is a clear trend in the development of international human rights protec- tion, which is manifested by the creation of mechanisms to protect the rights of individuals belonging to social or ethnic groups subject to various forms of exclu- sion. So far, the United Nations has adopted conventions to guarantee the rights of, among others, persons belonging to racial minorities, women, children and *PhD, Centre for Human Rights, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Warsaw. ORCID: 〈https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9116-7679〉. The author would like to thank FEANTSA’s policy officer Maria José Aldanas for her support in the work on the article, particularly for reviewing the survey carried out for the purpose of this text and assisting in reaching out to the survey par- ticipants. The author is grateful to the editor and reviewers for their helpful comments on the earlier version of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CULTURE of HOMELESSNESS: an Ethnographic Study
    THE CULTURE OF HOMELESSNESS: An ethnographic study Megan Honor Ravenhill London School of Economics PhD in Social Policy UMI Number: U615614 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615614 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 I V|£:S H S f <§195 I O I S S 4 -7 ABSTRACT The thesis argues that homelessness is complex and synergical in nature. It discusses the life events and processes that often trigger, protect against and predict the likelihood of someone becoming homeless (and/or roofless). It argues, that people’s routes into homelessness are complex, multiple and interlinked and are the result of biographical, structural and behavioural factors. This complexity increases with the age of the individual and the duration of their rooflessness. The thesis explores the homeless culture as a counter-culture created through people being pushed out of mainstream society. It argues, that what happened to people in the past, created the nature of the homeless culture. Furthermore it is argued that any serious attempt at resettling long-term rough sleepers needs to consider what it is that the homeless culture offers and whether or how this can be replicated within housed society.
    [Show full text]
  • Decriminalizing Homelessness: Why Right to Rest Legislation Is the High Road for Oregon 2
    DECRIMINALIZING HOMELESSNESS: WHY RIGHT TO REST LEGISLATION IS THE HIGH ROAD FOR OREGON 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon prepared this report with the assistance of our dedicated staff, volunteers, and community partners. We would like to thank the following individuals for their invaluable contributions to this project. Heather Marek, a law and sociology student at the University of Oregon, researched and drafted the report. Katie Sawicki wrote the executive summary and introduction and interviewed people for the spotlights. Zoe La Du, Corrine Fletcher, Elena Stross, and Franz Bruggemeier helped compile data on municipal and county ordinances. Special thanks to: Ibrahim, Mel, Cara, and Dakota for sharing their stories. Paul Boden, Coral Feigin, and the other staff and volunteers with the Western Regional Advocacy Project which includes Right 2 Survive, Sisters Of The Road and Street Roots in Oregon. Alision McIntosh of Neighborhood Partnerships. DECRIMINALIZING HOMELESSNESS: Why Right to Rest legislation is the High Road for Oregon Copyright© 2017 by the American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon All rights reserved. ACLU of Oregon P.O. Box 40585 Portland, OR 97240 503.227.3186 [email protected] www.aclu-or.org ACLU of Oregon 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION HOMELESSNESS IN OREGON Who is Unhoused 7 A Growing State of Emergency 7 HISTORICAL APPROACHES TO HOMELESSNESS THE ENACTMENT OF ANTI-HOMELESS LAWS IN OREGON Methods for Measuring Criminalization in Oregon 12 Anti-Homeless Laws are Prevalent in Oregon
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 4 Fallfinal.Indd
    Top 10 What is Local Both Employers “Bumvertising?” Sides of 4 5 Music7 the8 Gun : Oct. 3 - Oct. 16, 2006 Newspaper for the University of Houston-Downtown Fall Volume 37 Issue 4 atelineS t u d e n t - R u n owntown s i n c e v o l u m e D D but it is up to the students to put By Monica Maza them to good use. Online banking Assistant Editor is a great way to keep track of GatorCard set your spending habits and will Beginning Spring 2007, help you learn valuable UHD will have a new look for budgeting skills that our student ID cards and the card to Attack! you will need for the will also enable a new system for bank account, or (3) a for them rest of your life. retrieving our fi nancial aid faster. paper check. to remember to In preparation for this new UHD has partnered with Higher Once students treat this Gator system, UHD needs students to One, Inc., a fi nancial services choose the Easy Refund Card as a real, verify their mailing addresses company, to bring the new Gator option, the Gator Card legitimate debit online via E-services. The new Card to students, which will will function as a normal card. As with Gator Cards will be mailed have two functions: it will be Debit MasterCard®. This any bank card, directly to all students, so it is UHD’s offi cial student ID card feature will give students make sure to very important that the address and it will offer a new method the option to open a report the card on fi le for each student is correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Opposition to Measures That Criminalize Homelessness |
    REPORT OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES B of T Report 28-A-19 Subject: Opposition to Measures that Criminalize Homelessness (Resolution 410-A-18) Presented by: Jack Resneck, Jr., MD, Chair Referred to: Reference Committee D (Diana Ramos, MD, MPH, Chair) 1 INTRODUCTION 2 3 Resolution 410-A-18, “Opposition to Measures that Criminalize Homelessness,” introduced by the 4 Medical Student Section and referred by the House of Delegates asks that: 5 6 Our American Medical Association oppose measures that criminalize necessary means of 7 living among homeless persons, including but not limited to, sitting or sleeping in public 8 spaces; and advocate for legislation that requires non-discrimination against homeless persons, 9 such as homeless bills of rights. 10 11 CURRENT AMA POLICY 12 13 Existing AMA policy supports improving health outcomes and decreasing the health care costs of 14 treating people who are chronically homeless through clinically proven, high quality, and cost- 15 effective approaches, which recognize the positive impact of stable and affordable housing coupled 16 with social services. The AMA recognizes that stable, affordable housing as a first priority, without 17 mandated therapy or services compliance, is effective in improving housing stability and quality of 18 life among individuals who are chronically-homeless. Furthermore, the AMA recognizes that lack 19 of identification is a barrier to accessing medical care and fundamental services that support health; 20 and supports policy changes that streamline, simplify, and reduce or eliminate the cost of obtaining 21 identification cards for the homeless population. Current policy does not specifically address 22 criminalizing homelessness.
    [Show full text]
  • Under-Propertied Persons Marc L
    Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 27 Article 1 Issue 1 Fall 2017 Under-Propertied Persons Marc L. Roark Savannah Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp Part of the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Roark, Marc L. (2017) "Under-Propertied Persons," Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy: Vol. 27 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cjlpp/vol27/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Cornell Law: A Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES UNDER-PROPERTIED PERSONS Marc L. Roark* Property shapes the way we talk about our communities and our- selves. It also, unintentionally, shapes the way we talk about the poor. Within property, the doctrine of waste reinforces notions of autonomy, privacy, and boundary-makingfor property owners, while leaving those without property searching for other ways to assert these self-defining protections. Likewise, nuisance assists owners' participation in their communities by dictating when individuals must accountfor harms their property use causes to neighbors. The law, however, provides few legal remediesfor poor persons who are harmed by owners' sanctioned use of property. Through the language of ownership, property doctrinesfacili- tate special benefits for those with property, while forcing those outside of property to seek other means to assert similarbenefits. Owners-land- lords of gap rentals, public housing authorities, and cities-often treat their poorest residents as problems to be managed rather than residents deserving autonomy and community.
    [Show full text]
  • Traverse City, Michigan 49684
    HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION Board Members: Lee Hornberger, Chair Steve Mentzer, Vice Chair November 9, 2015 Mattias Johnson 5:30 P.M. Barbara McClellan Taylor Nash 2nd Floor County Committee Room Laura Nerone Governmental Center, Traverse City, MI 49684 Patricia Nugent Susan Odgers Posted: 10/8/15 Jodi Stinnet Information and minutes are available from the Human Resources Office, Governmental Center, 400 Boardman, Traverse City, MI 49684 922-4481. TDD: 922-4412. If you are planning to attend and you have a disability requiring any special assistance at the meeting, please notify the Assistant City Manager, by noon of the above meeting date. AGENDA 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 12, 2015 REGULAR MEETING 3. PUBLIC COMMENT 4. OLD BUSINESS a. Resolution b. Discussion regarding the Fall Education Forum c. Discussion of 2015 Sarah Hardy Award d. Martin Luther King Day 5. NEW BUSINESS 6. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS 7. ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting date: December 14 @ 5:30 p.m. The Agenda Items (w/back up material) and Committee Chair Reports MUST BE submitted to Ex Officio, Kristine Bosley ([email protected]) no later than noon, Wednesday, November 4, 2015. Commissioner Packets to be emailed November 6, 2015. The City of Traverse City does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its programs or activities. Penny Hill, Assistant City Manager, 400 Boardman Avenue, Traverse City, 49684, 922-4440, TDD 922-4412, has been designated to coordinate compliance with non-discrimination requirements contained in section 35.107 of the Department of Justice regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Employment Discrimination Against the Homeless
    SARAH GOLABEK-GOLDMAN Ban the Address: Combating Employment Discrimination Against the Homeless A B ST R ACT. This Note presents a study of obstacles to employment faced by homeless job applicants and offers potential solutions. Homeless job applicants confront discrimination when they provide the address of a shelter or do not have an address to provide on applications. Advo- cates should seek to protect homeless job applicants by encouraging businesses, nonprofits, and government agencies to provide homeless applicants with addresses or P.O. boxes. Most signifi- cantly, the proposed "Ban the Address" campaign would discourage employers from inquiring about an applicant's address or residency history until after granting a provisional offer of em- ployment. Advocacy efforts such as these can serve as a foundation for successful legal claims under new homeless person's bills of rights, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. This Note explains why requesting residency information might be deemed illegal under both state and federal causes of action. A combination of both legal and nonlegal tactics has the best chance of permitting homeless job applicants to obtain employment and to regain self-sufficiency. AU THOR. Yale Law School, J.D. 2016. Yale School of Management, M.B.A. 2016. Professor Michael Wishnie provided exceptional mentorship and guidance the past three years. This Note is published due to the commitment and partnership of Yale Law Journal editor Nathan Nash, who provided invaluable suggestions. I am indebted to Urja Mittal for her astute feedback, as well as to Grace Hart, Hilary Ledwell, Aaron Levine, and Anna Mohan for their vigilant editing.
    [Show full text]
  • Discrimination at the Margins: the Intersectionality of Homelessness & Other Marginalized Groups
    Seattle University School of Law Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons Homeless Rights Advocacy Project Law School Archives 5-8-2015 Discrimination at the Margins: The Intersectionality of Homelessness & Other Marginalized Groups Kaya Lurie Breanne Schuster Sara Rankin Seattle University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/hrap Recommended Citation Lurie, Kaya; Schuster, Breanne; and Rankin, Sara, "Discrimination at the Margins: The Intersectionality of Homelessness & Other Marginalized Groups" (2015). Homeless Rights Advocacy Project. 8. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/hrap/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Archives at Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Homeless Rights Advocacy Project by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DISCRIMINATION AT THE MARGINS: The Intersectionality of Homelessness & Other Marginalized Groups Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2602532 Discrimination at the Margins: The Intersectionality of Homelessness & Other Marginalized Groups AUTHORS Kaya Lurie & Breanne Schuster EDITOR Sara K. Rankin Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2602532 Discrimination at the Margins May 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Homeless Rights Advocacy Practicum is a section of the Homeless Rights Advocacy Project (HRAP) at Seattle University School of Law’s Korematsu Center. Kaya Lurie and Breanne Schuster, law students at Seattle University School of Law and members of the founding cohort of HRAP, authored this policy brief under the supervision of Professor Sara Rankin of Seattle University School of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Link Madeleine Ann Nelson Director: Greg Garrett, Ph. D
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
    [Show full text]