Architecture Is Dead: a Renewed Organic Aesthetic for Ecological Design

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Architecture Is Dead: a Renewed Organic Aesthetic for Ecological Design ARCHITECTURE IS DEAD 45 Architecture Is Dead: A Renewed Organic Aesthetic for Ecological Design LEONARD DAISUKE YUI University of Oregon “There, in the physical realm of the built world, we The modern use of organic metaphors, which the seem to be presented with dramatic proof… that lan- architectural historian Mari Havattum refers to as, guage, far from being the servant of man, is all too often his master.” Kenneth Frampton “one of the most commonly used metaphors in the history of modern architecture,” continues to im- LIVING AND DEAD METAPHORS ply the preference for the quality of life and I will therefore refer to this conditional use as a living An organic metaphor in ecological design has a metaphor. It will also help to delineate an alterna- need to standout as offering something new in or- tive construct3 I will make in a moment. der to be an effective and a provocative metaphor. It must address the historical organic emergence,1 The case for an alternative begins with an intui- its transition to a modern machine aesthetic and tive question about whether a building as a living then its appropriation into an ecological movement. organism really fulfills the complexity and dyna- One way to investigate the relevance of today’s mism of nature. Di Palma points out that the or- organic metaphors is to provide a comprehensive ganic metaphor’s specificity to “create and sustain definition of nature, to locate and identify an eco- life” intersects the human dream to “recapture a logical emphasis and to reveal ecological functions prelapsarian state of harmony and grace.” Archi- that can help to inspire creative applications while tects like Walter Gropius would echo this4 notion providing direct ecological engagement. Accom- through organic design as “breathing soul into the plishing this will require folding in new concepts life of a building.” Nature in this sense, is a pri- and expanding an interpretation of the traditional mary model of good,5 but has little reference to the organic metaphor without destroying its useful in- destructive qualities that also clearly characterize tended applications. it, to which Di Palma calls a “paradox.” Ecologists, historians and philosophers have a direct response An Organic Paradox to Disequilibrium to nature’s paradox by formulating a new model for The primary use of the term “organic” arose as ear- nature based on recognition of a world in flux. The ly as the 19th century. Organic metaphors consist of architectural historian Amy Kulper refers to a shift varying interpretations as to how it is applied, but it in interest from “’what’ nature and culture produce, also shares a clear focus on “life” and “vitality.” The to the ‘how’ of natural and cultural production.” architectural historian Vittoria Di Palma describes 6 what is generally understood about the primary fo- The living metaphor was largely established by cus of organic metaphors as follows: findings of the late nineteenth and twentieth cen- tury scientists, naturalists and thinkers like the “…to focus on the organic metaphor entails, necessar- Ernst Haeckel, Georges Cuvier, and August Wilhelm ily, privileging questions that concern architecture’s relationship to life, to nature in its creative role, and Schlegel among many others. During the early to species that exhibit processes of growth, develop- twentieth century the ecologist7 Frederic Clements ment, and change.”2 and Eugene Odum helped to codify a theory of the 46 LOCAL IDENTITIES GLOBAL CHALLENGES ecosystem in equilibrium and balance. However, ecosystems as ‘open’ and strongly influenced by the as early as 1926 another prominent ecologist8 Hen- input and output or ‘flux’ of material and individuals across system borders.”10 ry Gleason challenged the notion unsuccessfully with a theory that put forth a controversial “indi- This disequilibrium view comes at time when the ar- vidualistic concept” of nature, where “each migrat- chitectural world is blind to many important social ing body acts for itself and moves by itself almost and health issues plaguing communities. A signifi- always completely independent of other species.” cant blight is the phenomenon of waste, like mate- This was later revalidated by scientists in the late9 rial waste in our landfills, which in 2007 represented seventies. This more recent understanding of the two-thirds of all non-industrial solid waste genera- ecosystem is characterized by ecologists and land- tion in the US.11 Design philosophies of William Mc- scape architect Ronald Pulliam and Bart Johnson donough and Michael Braungarts’ “Cradle to Cradle,” and other growing number academics. They ex- John Lyle’s “Regenerative Designs,” and Stephen plain two shifts toward a new understanding of dis- Moore’s “Non-modern thesis” all offer a new way to equilibrium science as follows: rethink the fundamentals of ecological design that “…(1) a shift from an equilibrium point of view are more inline with a disequilibrium model of the where local populations and ecosystems are viewed world. Following in the same vein, an alternative as in balance with local resources and conditions, to metaphor representing a disequilibrium view, which a disequilibrium point of view where history matters I refer to as a dead metaphor, could assist in con- and populations and ecosystems are continually be- ing influenced by disturbances…(2) a shift from con- fronting a death paradox by inspiring architects to sidering populations and ecosystems as relatively directly address issues like waste in terms of a com- closed or autonomous systems independent of their prehensive ecological design construct.12 surroundings to considering both populations and ORGANIC METAPHOR LIVING METAPHOR (ex. Flower) DEAD METAPHOR (ex. Deadwood) I. DEFINITION A living metaphor utilizes a simplified A dead metaphor offers an alternative understanding of nature and looses it perspective of the ecological landscape by “metaphorical tension.” It ultimately challenging presumptions about the human offers nothing new to inspire the mind. aesthetic relationship with its context. II. EMPHASIS A living metaphor emphasizes the A dead metaphor offers an emphasis based on building-object for a solution for the literal understandings making it a “strong ecological issues. The machine metaphor.” The process of decomposition in aesthetic that preceded it still manifests particular redirects an emphasis about the itself in the organic metaphor by referent object to its surroundings and to functionally turning organisms into dynamic temporal states, which leads to open- machines or vice versa. ended goals. III. FUNCTION A living metaphor relies on common and A dead metaphor offers unfamiliar, but inspiring vague ecological reasons to apply literal ecological associations that allow for a functional metaphors, which make them direct application of ecological functions to a uninspiring. building. Table 1. Questions for an Organic Metaphor ARCHITECTURE IS DEAD 47 CLARIFYING QUESTIONS recently the Living Building Challenge (LBC) uses a “flower” with a claim to establish a more holistic A dead metaphor is largely a response to a living approach to green design than USGBC’s LEED metaphor’s inadequacy to illuminate a clear ecologi- program.17 The author Jason Mclennan extracts cal purpose. The topics of definition, emphasis and from the flower an array of functional biological function will be used to clarify the current shortcom- processes to apply to building design to meet his ings of a living metaphor and provide a case for a metaphorical “Living Building” status.18 Finally in more robust interpretation of an organic metaphor. I Cradle to Cradle the authors William Mcdonough use deadwood, also known as Coarse Woody Debris and Michael Braungart use a tree to describe the (CWD) by ecologists, as a dead metaphor to inves- creation of energy production, so that “buildings… tigate the complexity of a disequilibrium model in like trees, (could) produce more energy than they design. The living metaphor has a variety of existing consume.”19 uses, however I will primarily focus on the Living Building Challenge’s use of flower as a generic but The nature implied by the examples above share clear contemporary example of a living metaphor a vague understanding of the term and does little applied to ecological design. Table 1 lays out a sum- to challenge new conceptions about the ecological mary of both the living and dead metaphor respons- world. The historian Amy Kulper, in echoing Paul es to the three selected topics. The following are the Ricoeur’s definition of a metaphor to ‘tell us questions used to begin an inquiry into each topic. something new about reality,’ advocates for a restoration of “metaphorical tension” in order to Can an organic metaphor convey… avoid tautological analogies between building styles 1. a contemporary ecological definition of ‘na- and organic species.20 In the case of species-styles ture’ for design? metaphor that favors similarities over their respective 2. a clear ecological emphasis for design? difference Kulper explains the following issues. 3. a direct ecological function for design? “The conflation of species and style is due to the historical process of immanentisation in which style Definition loses its rhetorical connotation as the internal co- Can the organic metaphor convey a comprehensive herence of nature and comes to be understood as ecological definition of nature for design? the internal coherence of human inner nature. This shift renders style a contingency of personal
Recommended publications
  • The Application of Visualisation
    THE APPLICATION OF VISUALISATION TOOLS TO ENABLE ARCHITECTS TO EXPLORE THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SMART MATERIALS IN A CONTEMPORARY SHANASHIL BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENT FOR HOT ARID CLIMATES Tamarah Alqalami Ph.D. Thesis 2017 THE APPLICATION OF VISUALISATION TOOLS TO ENABLE ARCHITECTS TO EXPLORE THE DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF SMART MATERIALS IN A CONTEMPORARY SHANASHIL BUILDING DESIGN ELEMENT FOR HOT ARID CLIMATES School of the Built Environment University of Salford, Salford, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, August 2017 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................ V LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. IX ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ....................................................................................................................... X DEDICATION ...................................................................................................................................... XI ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................. XII ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism Without Modernity: the Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Mauro F
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Management Papers Wharton Faculty Research 6-2004 Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Mauro F. Guillen University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons Recommended Citation Guillen, M. F. (2004). Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940. Latin American Research Review, 39 (2), 6-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0032 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers/279 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Abstract : Why did machine-age modernist architecture diffuse to Latin America so quickly after its rise in Continental Europe during the 1910s and 1920s? Why was it a more successful movement in relatively backward Brazil and Mexico than in more affluent and industrialized Argentina? After reviewing the historical development of architectural modernism in these three countries, several explanations are tested against the comparative evidence. Standards of living, industrialization, sociopolitical upheaval, and the absence of working-class consumerism are found to be limited as explanations. As in Europe, Modernism
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretations of Organic Architecture
    Melisa Unvan - Mimarlikta Bilimsel Arastirma Yontemleri Interpretations of Organic Architecture Authors: Martina Zbašnik-Senegaènik, Manja Kitek Kuzman University of Ljubljana Faculty of Architecture Slovenia - 1000 Ljubljana, Zoisova ulica 12 Technical Sciences / Architecture and Urban Planning Article Received / Accepted: 10. 9. 2014. / 8. 12. 2014. Abstract The notion of organic architecture originally sprung from the ideas of Viollet le-Duc and Ruskin, which influenced Wright and Gaudí. The second interpretation of organic architecture is based on mathematic and geometric laws that originate in nature. According to the third interpretation, organic architecture finds inspiration in nature and emulates the shapes of living organisms. Biomimicry computational geometry organic Gaudí, Antoni architecture Wright, Frank Lloyd Introduction The second half of the 19th century saw a new revival of Gothic architecture as well as the classical rules of Greek architecture. The proponents of these new architectural principles, Viollet-le-Duc and John Ruskin, were inspired by natural shapes and processes while simultaneously advocating the continuation of the medieval handcrafted art tradition as opposed to introducing new industrial methods. This article’s purpose is to define each interpretation of organic architecture, to find the respective most influential representatives, as well as to present the key laws that influenced architectural design and planning. https://tr.depositphotos.com/167514124/stock-illustration-organic-architecture-the-concept-of.html ORIGINS OF ORGANIC ARCHITECTURE Viollet-le-Duc John Ruskin Do not imitate nature Honest display of material and but construction emulate its laws Ornamentation https://yzarch.wordpress.com/2017/01/04/rethinking-architectural-vocabulary-2016/ http://www.victorianweb.org/authors/ruskin/7lamps/4.html Interpretations of Organic Architecture Louis Sullivan Louis Sullivan claimed that ”if the work is to be organic, the function of the parts must have the same quality as the function of the whole”.
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Findings
    Architectural Findings Summary of Architectural Trends 1940‐70 National architectural trends are evident within the survey area. The breakdown of mid‐20th‐ century styles and building types in the Architectural Findings section gives more detail about the Dayton metropolitan area’s built environment and its place within national architectural developments. In American Architecture: An Illustrated Encyclopedia, Cyril Harris defines Modern architecture as “A loosely applied term, used since the late 19th century, for buildings, in any of number of styles, in which emphasis in design is placed on functionalism, rationalism, and up‐to‐date methods of construction; in contrast with architectural styles based on historical precedents and traditional ways of building. Often includes Art Deco, Art Moderne, Bauhaus, Contemporary style, International Style, Organic architecture, and Streamline Moderne.” (Harris 217) The debate over traditional styles versus those without historic precedent had been occurring within the architectural community since the late 19th century when Louis Sullivan declared that form should follow function and Frank Lloyd Wright argued for a purely American expression of design that eschewed European influence. In 1940, as America was about to enter the middle decades of the 20th century, architects battled over the merits of traditional versus modern design. Both the traditional Period Revival, or conservative styles, and the early 20th‐century Modern styles lingered into the 1940s. Period revival styles, popular for decades, could still be found on commercial, governmental, institutional, and residential buildings. Among these styles were the Colonial Revival and its multiple variations, the Tudor Revival, and the Neo‐Classical Revival. As the century progressed, the Colonial Revival in particular would remain popular, used as ornament for Cape Cod and Ranch houses, apartment buildings, and commercial buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLORING the SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCHITECTURE and NATURE: a NORDIC TRAINING CENTER by DIANA V. DIETERICH, B.A. A
    EXPLORING THE SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ARCHITECTURE AND NATURE: A NORDIC TRAINING CENTER by DIANA V. DIETERICH, B.A. A THESIS IN ARCHITECTURE Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial FulfiUment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARCHITECTURE ^ _Appryoi>^^d /^ Accepted December, 1996 1)05 » 5 AKNOWLEDGEMENTS .•x n^ I would sincerely like to thank Professor James White, Dr. Michael Jones and Professor Michael Peters for their guidance, support and enduring patience. I would also like to thank my family, Dirk, Cody and Mica for your love and understanding. 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ii LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES v CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 Purpose and Intention of the Study 1 n. PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS 3 III. ORIGINS OF ORGANIC MOVEMENT 25 European Expressionism and Organic Architecture 48 Contemporary Organic Architecture 52 Chaos and the Future of Nature-Oriented Architecture 64 IV. PROJECT: NORDIC SPORTS CENTER 70 The Development and Organization of Nordic Skiing 71 Physical Context 78 Societal Context 86 Activity Analysis 99 Space Analysis 111 BIBLIOGRAPHY 121 APPENDIX A: LAND USE PERMIT SYSTEM 126 APPENDIX B: PROJECT DRAWINGS 132 111 LIST OF TABLES 4.1 Average Monthly Temperatures Recorded at Lemon Dam 82 4.2 Natural Hazards of the Uinta Soil Group 85 4.3 EconomicIndicatorsoftheDurango Area, 1995 94 4.4 Employess, Payroll and Establishments by Industry 95 4.5 Recreational Facilities in Durango 98 4.6 Space Synopsis 118 IV LIST OF FIGURES Figure 4.1 Space Inventory - Indoor Facilities 110 Figure B.l Axonometric of Nordic Training Center 133 Figure B.2 Site Plan (C.I.= 10') 134 Figure B.3 Floor Plan 135 Figure B.4 North and South Elevations 136 Figure B.5 East and West Elevations 137 Figure B .6 Sections A-A' and B-B' 138 Figure B.7 Sections C-C and D-D' 139 Figure B.8 Typical Building Section 140 Figure B.9 Exterior Perspective of Entry 141 Figure B.
    [Show full text]
  • Design,Architecture, and Decorative Arts the Library of David A. Hanks
    Design,Architecture, and Decorative Arts The Library of David A. Hanks (1298 titles in circa 1320 volumes) Partial catalogue – projected to be 1500 volumes ARS LIBRI THE LIBRARY OF DAVID A. HANKS General works p. 1 -- 61 Monographs on Architects p. 62 -- 81 GENERAL WORKS 1 ABBOTT, LYMAN, ET AL. The House and Home: A Practical Book. By Lyman Abbott, L.W. Betts, Elizabeth Bisland, H.C. Candee, John M. Gerard, Constance Cary Harrison, P.G. Hubert, Jr., Thomas Wentworth Higginson, M.G. Humphreys, M.C. Jones, E.W. McGlasson, Samuel Parsons, Jr., J. West Roosevelt, W.O. Stoddard, Kate Douglas Wiggin. 2 vols. xii, (4), 400pp., 5 color plates; xii, 397, (1)pp., 6 color plates. 400 illus. 4to. Orig. publisher’s cloth (slightly rubbed). New York (Charles Scribner’s Sons), 1894-1896. 2 (ABSOLUT COMPANY) LEWIS, RICHARD W. Absolut Book: The Absolut Vodka Advertising Story. xiii, (1), 274pp. Prof. illus. in color. Lrg. 4to. Wraps. Boston/Tokyo (Journey Editions), 1996. 3 ACKERMANN, RUDOLPH. Ackermann’s Regency Furniture & Interiors. Text by Pauline Agius. Introduction by Stephen Jones. 200pp. 188 illus. (partly color). Lrg. sq. 4to. Cloth. d.j. Published to mark the centenary of H. Blairman & Sons. Marlborough, Wiltshire (The Crowood Press), 1984. 4 ADAMSON, JEREMY. American Wicker: Woven Furniture from 1850 to 1930. Woven furniture from 1850 to 1930. 175, (1)pp. Prof. illus. (partly color). 4to. Wraps. Published on the occasion of the exhibition at The Renwick Gallery of the National Museum of American Art, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. New York (Rizzoli), 1993. 5 ADLIN, JANE.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank Lloyd Wright's
    Frank Lloyd Wright’s The Studiowith Organic Architecture ART HIST RY KIDS LET’S MEET THE ARCHITECT Frank Lloyd Wright June 8, 1867 – April 9, 1959 Frank Lloyd Wright was an American archi- tect who continually reinvented his style during his 70 year career designing forward thinking buildings– big and small. He was born in Wisconsin and he spent most of his childhood surrounded by nature. His family moved around when he was young, but they ended up back in Wisconsin when he was 11. Wright studied at The University of Wiscon- sin-Madison for 2 semesters (and later received an honorary degree from the University), but was eager to get to work designing, so he never finished college. Frank moved to Chicago when he was 20 to pursue his dream of becoming an archi- tect, and he started working with the best people in the business almost immediately. Frank Lloyd Wright explored many different styles, but everything he designed had an element of his love for nature. He believed that above all else, great architecture should work in harmony with its surround- ings, and the structures he created express that desire. In addition to designing buildings, he also took great care in designing beautiful interior windows and in furnishings like dinnerware, chairs, and rugs. He’s been called an architectural visionary, and he‘s one of the most famous architects in history. Wright was honored by the American Institute of Architects’ as the “Greatest American Architect of All Time.” April 2020 11 Frank Lloyd Wright’s The Studiowith Organic Architecture ART HIST RY KIDS ART MOVEMENTS What is Organic Architecture? Frank Lloyd Wright called his designs Organic Architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (formerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. X New Submission ________ Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Mid-Century Modern Residential Architecture in Norwich, Vermont B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) I. Residential Architecture in Norwich, Vermont, 1945-1975 II. Architects Working in Norwich, Vermont, 1945-1975 C. Form Prepared by: name/title Lyssa Papazian & Brian Knight, Historic Preservation Consultants organization Lyssa Papazian Historic Preservation Consultant street & number 13 Dusty Ridge Road city or town Putney state Vermont zip code 05346 e-mail [email protected] telephone (802) 579-3698 date 6/20/19 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. _______________________________ ______________________ _________________________ Signature of certifying official Title Date _____________________________________ State or Federal Agency or Tribal government I hereby certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related properties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Architecture Means for Sustainability Goals
    1 ORGANIC ARCHITECTURE MEANS FOR SUSTAINABILITY GOALS R. Mirzaei Department of Architecture, Birjand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Birjand, Iran Abstract Organic Architecture is not a style of imitation, but rather, a reinterpretation of Nature's principles to build forms more natural than nature itself. Engineers, designers and architects often look to nature for inspiration. The research on “natural constructions” is aiming at innovation and the improvement of architectural quality. The introduction of life sciences terminology in the context of architecture delivers new perspectives towards innovation in architecture and design. The investigation is focused on the analogies between nature and architecture. From the time immemorial, human beings have been accompanied with the nature and natural organisms. These interactions sometimes lead to different and contradictory paradigms but the natural organisms have always been the inspiring sources for humans. Mother Nature has devotes its countless gifts and resources generously to human beings to be able to develop their civilizations all over the world. Each with its own culture, beliefs, values, traditions, attitudes and ethics is the element of people differentiation in different societies. In the other hand, we are nature. So, we should respect and learning from nature. However, they necessarily not always successful as degree of their success depended upon their perception and understanding of the nature of organisms. Later, some biological comparisons were introduced focusing on formal and structural aspects to have wider perspective about the nature of the organisms and new rules and regulations. These gave rise to critical faults and disadvantages. Like human beings themselves, their architectures possess integral, united and harmonic system that is demonstrated in the best possible form in the natural organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Heritage Papers 5 ; Identification and Documentation of Modern
    World Heritage papers5 Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage Identification and Documentation of Modern Heritage Disclaimer The authors are responsible for the choice and presentation of the facts contained in this publication and for the opinions therein, which are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. The designation employed and the presentation of the material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Published in 2003 by the UNESCO World Heritage Centre with financial contribution from the Netherlands Funds-in-Trust 7, place de Fontenoy 75352 Paris 07 SP France Tel : 33 (0)1 45 68 18 76 Fax : 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 E-mail : [email protected] http://whc.unesco.org Compiled and edited by R. van Oers and S. Haraguchi Foreword Under the Global Strategy for a credible, balanced and representative World Heritage List, adopted by the World Heritage Committee in 1994, the World Heritage Centre is engaged in assisting States Parties that have few or no World Heritage sites to protect, preserve and nominate their heritage of outstanding universal value. Next to this, a pro-active approach is also taken with regard to the identification and documentation of less-represented categories of heritage for inclusion on the World Heritage List. One such category is Modern Heritage, which comprises the architecture, town planning and landscape design of the 19th and 20th centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • ITEM 3 - Old Business HISTORIC and ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT
    ITEM 3 - Old Business HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL PRESERVATION BOARD STAFF REPORT NAME Spring Garden Historic District ADDRESS 1001 NW North River Drive PROJECT DESCRIPTION Alterations to a contributing home completed without Building Permits or a Certificate of Appropriateness. and other Code Violations. ANALYSIS This home was built in 1958 and is a contributing home in the Spring Garden Historic District. The owner and his contractor have been con tacted to stop work prior to construction. This site was originally cited for painting witho ut a COA and has since been cited for illegal work without a permit and illega! units. The Building Department has issued two slop work orders or · red tags· and Code Enforcement has sent the owner notification of pending Gode Violations, At this time no Building Permits, Certificate of Appropri ateness or a Certificate to Dig have bee n applied obtained Following the City of Miami Capital Improvements Program's (CIP) streetscape work in Spring Garden , CIP completed some repairs to private driveways and walkways to reconnect them to the new roadway and sidewalk elevations. however it was confirmed by the Preservalion Officer and CIP that the property owner at 1001 NW North River Drive went beyond the scope of the CIP roadway ag reement, doubling the width of the existing driveway, adding new entry steps and a landing to the front of the house, adding a new front walkway, and removing the gara ge door and blocking in the opening. The applicant has submitted an after-the-fact application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for alterations.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Hess Comments
    ALAN HESS A R C H I T E C T 4991 CORKWOOD LANE IRVINE, CA 92612 949 551 5343 [email protected] January 19, 2021 Community Development Department City of Orange 300 East Chapman Avenue Orange, CA 92866 Attention: Robert Garcia [email protected] re: Historic Resources Assessment of 363 S. Main St., Orange To the Community Development Department: As an architect and historian, I would like to state my concerns about the Historic Resources Assessment of 363 Main St., Orange, prepared by LSA (July 2020.) This report is insufficient for making planning decisions about this office building. The report’s conclusions that “the City may reach a finding of No Impact regarding historic‐period built environment resources. No mitigation measures are recommended for historic‐period built environment resources” (p. 24) are not proven by its evidence. This report contains many historical inaccuracies, leading to its misleading conclusion about the building’s significance. I would recommend that the city have a peer review performed by an independent expert selected by the city from a list of qualified and certified architectural historical professionals. I reach this conclusion as a historian. I have published twenty books on twentieth century architectural history. Many of these books are on Modern architecture, especially in Southern California. I am also a resident of Orange County, and serve as a Commissioner on the California State Historical Resources Commission, though I am writing as an independent professional and not on behalf of the Commission. My resume is attached. I will not itemize each mistaken element in the report; that would be the job for the peer review.
    [Show full text]