DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Guidelines for Irrigation Suitability Land Classification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Guidelines for Irrigation Suitability Land Classification Technical Guidelines for Irrigation Suitability Land Classification U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center June 2005 Technical Guidelines for Irrigation Suitability Land Classification June 2005 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Land Suitability and Water Quality Group Denver, Colorado Table of Contents Page Chapter I: Basic Requirements .............................................................................................I-1 I.A Purpose and Objectives...............................................................................................I-1 I.B Authority and Justification..........................................................................................I-2 I.C Definitions of Terms...................................................................................................I-3 I.D Principles.....................................................................................................................I-7 I.D.1 Prediction........................................................................................................I-8 I.D.2 Economic Correlation.....................................................................................I-9 I.D.3 Permanent-Changeable Factors......................................................................I-9 I.D.4 Arable-Irrigable Analysis..............................................................................I-10 Chapter II: Factors of Land Classification........................................................................ II-1 II.A General...................................................................................................................... II-1 II.B Economic Factors......................................................................................................II-1 II.B.1 Productive Capacity...................................................................................... II-2 II.B.2 Cost of Production ........................................................................................ II-3 II.B.3 Irrigation Development Costs....................................................................... II-3 II.B.4 Interactions.................................................................................................... II-4 II.B.5 Management.................................................................................................. II-4 II.C Physical and Chemical Factors ................................................................................. II-5 II.C.1 Soil ..............................................................................................................II-5 II.C.2 Soil Quality................................................................................................... II-5 II.C.3 Soil Characteristics ....................................................................................... II-6 II.C.4 Topography................................................................................................. II-10 II.C.5 Drainage...................................................................................................... II-13 II.C.6 Water Supply.............................................................................................. II-17 II.C.7 Climate........................................................................................................ II-21 Chapter III: Land Classification Specifications and Basic Land Classes................... III-1 III.A Land Classification Specifications........................................................................... III-1 III.A.1 Development of Specifications................................................................. III-1 III.A.2 Specification Factors................................................................................. III-4 III.A.3 Specifications and Investigation Detail .................................................... III-6 III.A.4 Review of Specifications .......................................................................... III-8 III.B Basic Classes.......................................................................................................... III-18 III.B.1 Arable Area Classes................................................................................ III-24 III.B.2 Special Use Classes................................................................................. III-28 III.B.3 Basic Subclasses..................................................................................... III-29 III.B.4 Informative Appraisals............................................................................III-29 III.C Irrigable Land Classes............................................................................................ III-31 iii Table of Contents Page Chapter IV: Types of Land Classification Investigations .............................................IV-1 IV.A General ...................................................................................................................IV-1 IV.B Preconstruction Land Classification ........................................................................IV-3 IV.C Levels of Detail........................................................................................................IV-4 IV.C.1 Reconnaissance Level Investigation.........................................................IV-4 IV.C.2 Semi-Detailed Investigation......................................................................IV-7 IV.C.3 Detailed Investigation.............................................................................IV-11 IV.D Postconstruction Land Classification Investigation Types....................................IV-14 IV.D.1 Irrigable Area Determinations ................................................................IV-15 IV.D.2 Productive Area Determinations.............................................................IV-16 IV.D.3 Land Classification on Operating Projects .............................................IV-17 IV.D.4 Land Classification and Class 1 Equivalency.........................................IV-21 IV.D.5 Unapproved Land Classification.............................................................IV-22 Chapter V: Land Classification Techniques ...................................................................... V-1 V.A General .................................................................................................................V-1 V.B Preinvestigation Activities and Coordination ........................................................... V-1 V.B.1 Developing Scope of Work and Data Quality Objectives ......................... V-3 V.B.2 Available Land Data.................................................................................. V-4 V.B.3 Gross Investigation Area............................................................................V-5 V.B.4 Study Guidelines........................................................................................ V-6 V.B.5 Informative Appraisals...............................................................................V-7 V.B.6 Productivity and Land Development ......................................................... V-8 V.B.7 Soils............................................................................................................V-9 V.B.8 Land Use.................................................................................................. V-10 V.B.9 Farm Water Requirement......................................................................... V-10 V.B.10 Drainage................................................................................................... V-11 V.B.11 Present Land Characteristics.................................................................... V-12 V.B.12 Additional Informative Appraisals.......................................................... V-13 V.B.13 Base Maps and Equipment....................................................................... V-13 V.B.14 Personnel.................................................................................................. V-18 V.B.15 Coordination............................................................................................ V-19 V.B.16 Mapping Symbol...................................................................................... V-20 V.C Field Investigations................................................................................................. V-22 V.C.1 Field Orientation...................................................................................... V-23 V.C.2 Field Operation........................................................................................ V-24 V.C.3 Water Quality........................................................................................... V-30 V.C.4 Clay Type................................................................................................. V-30 V.C.5 Additional Factors Affecting Infiltration................................................. V-31 iv Table of Contents Page V.C.6 Additional Factors Affecting Available Water........................................ V-32 V.C.7 Evaluation for Predicted Level................................................................ V-35 V.C.8 Leaching................................................................................................... V-36 V.C.9 Soil Reclamation and Crop Selection ...................................................... V-36 V.C.10 Prediction of Anticipated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Reuse for Agriculture - Krish Illungkoo, S
    WASTEWATER RECYCLE, REUSE, AND RECLAMATION – Vol. I - Water Reuse for Agriculture - Krish Illungkoo, S. Vigneswaran WATER REUSE FOR AGRICULTURE Krish Illungkoo Department of Land and Water Conservation, New South Wales, Australia S. Vigneswaran Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia Keywords: Wastewater, reuse, irrigation, effluent, treatment, microbial, loading rates, environmental, sustainable Contents 1. Introduction 2. Treated Water Reuse by Irrigation 2.1. Principles 3. Public Health Aspects 3.1. Treatment 3.1.1. Secondary Treatment 3.1.2. Disinfection 3.2. Effluent Quality 3.3. Microbial Issues 4. Irrigation Schemes 4.1. Planning and Designing a Sustainable Irrigation System 4.1.1. Site Selection 4.1.2. Maximum Loading Rates and Minimum Land Requirements 4.2. Managing a Sustainable Irrigation System 4.2.1. Environmental Management Plan 4.3. Management Issues Specific to the Schemes 4.3.1. Ownership and Operation of Land 4.3.2. Calling for Expressions of Interest 4.3.3. Involving Potential Users in the Development of the Scheme 4.3.4. Identifying the Hidden Costs 4.3.5. Agreements 4.3.6. Scheme Manager 4.3.7. Involving the Broader Community 4.3.8. PotentialUNESCO Reuse Market – EOLSS 5. Conclusion AcknowledgementsSAMPLE CHAPTERS Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Increasing pressure on the world’s water resources are matched by rising environmental expectations in the community to minimize the impacts of human interventions in the natural water cycle. As a result, water management strategies such as wastewater ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) WASTEWATER RECYCLE, REUSE, AND RECLAMATION – Vol. I - Water Reuse for Agriculture - Krish Illungkoo, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Rehabilitating Degraded Lands on Soil Health, Pastures, Runoff, Erosion, Nutrient and Sediment Movement
    Impacts of rehabilitating degraded lands on soil health, pastures, runoff, erosion, nutrient and sediment movement. Part II: Literature review of rehabilitation methods to improve water quality flowing from grazing lands onto the Great Barrier Reef. RRRD.024 Final Report for the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country Reef Rescue Water Quality Research and Development Program RRRD.024 (A0000008317) Final Report 2014 Richard Silcock and Trevor J Hall Department of Agriculture and Fisheries PO Box 102, Toowoomba Qld 4350 Supported by the Australian Government’s Caring for Our Country Reef Rescue Water Quality Research and Development Program 1 Rehabilitating degraded D-condition grazing lands: Literature Review Project RRRD.024 Final Report Part II Richard G Silcock and Trevor J Hall Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Queensland 2014 Ord River Regeneration Reserve monitoring site Ord H04 from 1963 to 2014. 2 This publication has been compiled by Richard G. Silcock and Trevor J. Hall of Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries. © State of Queensland, 2014. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Extent & Impact of Land Degradation and Rehabilitation Strategies
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE): E-Journals Journal of Environment and Earth Science www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-3216 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0948 (Online) Vol.7, No.11, 2017 Extent & Impact of Land Degradation and Rehabilitation Strategies: Ethiopian Highlands Merkineh Mesene: Wolaita Sodo Univerisity; Natural Resource Management Dep’t; P.O.Box-138:W/Sodo, Ethiopia Abstract Throughout the world today, depletion of natural resources is among the major problems facing human beings. Land degradation, especially in the highlands, has been identified as the most serious environmental problem in Ethiopia. The Hararghae highlands in Eastern Ethiopia, Tigrai, Wollo, and Semen Shoa highlands in the north and the Gamo-Gofa highlands and the Bilate River basin, which starts in eastern slopes of Gurage highlands and stretches through eastern Hadiya and Kembatta highlands are some of the seriously eroded/degraded land surfaces in Ethiopia. The dominant man induced causes of land degradation in Ethiopia are poor farming practices, population pressure, overgrazing, over cultivation, soil erosion, deforestation, salinity and alkalinity problems, and the use of livestock manure and crop residue for fuel as energy resource of the rural households. The recorded annual soil erosion (surface soil movement) in Ethiopia ranges from low of 16 tons/ha/yr to high of 300 tons/ha/yr depending mainly on the slope, land cover, and rainfall intensities. The total estimated annual soil loss (surface soil movement) from the cultivated, range and pasture lands (780,000 km 2) in Ethiopia is estimated to range from low of 1.3 to an average of 7.8 billion metric tons per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Safe Use of Safe Wastewater in Agriculture Proceedings No
    A UN-Water project with the following members and partners: UNU-INWEH Proceedings of the UN-Water project on the Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Safe Use of Wastewater in Agriculture Wastewater Safe of Use Proceedings No. 11 No. Proceedings | UNW-DPC Publication SeriesUNW-DPC Coordinated by the UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development (UNW-DPC) Editors: Jens Liebe, Reza Ardakanian Editors: Jens Liebe, Reza Ardakanian (UNW-DPC) Compiling Assistant: Henrik Bours (UNW-DPC) Graphic Design: Katja Cloud (UNW-DPC) Copy Editor: Lis Mullin Bernhardt (UNW-DPC) Cover Photo: Untited Nations University/UNW-DPC UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development (UNW-DPC) United Nations University UN Campus Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1 53113 Bonn Germany Tel +49-228-815-0652 Fax +49-228-815-0655 www.unwater.unu.edu [email protected] All rights reserved. Publication does not imply endorsement. This publication was printed and bound in Germany on FSC certified paper. Proceedings Series No. 11 Published by UNW-DPC, Bonn, Germany August 2013 © UNW-DPC, 2013 Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the agencies cooperating in this project. The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the UN, UNW-DPC or UNU concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise indicated, the ideas and opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily represent the views of their employers.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Land Management and Its Relationship to Global
    Sustainable Land Management for Environmental Benefits and Food Security A synthesis report for the GEF Beverley Henry, Brian Murphy and Annette Cowie July 2018 Preface This paper brings together the latest knowledge about sustainable land management and its potential to deliver global environmental benefits and improved livelihoods. It will strengthen the scientific and technical understanding of sustainable land management and its contributions to environmental objectives, both global and local. The GEF’s Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) commissioned the study to support targeted efforts in the management of land degradation and to raise awareness of this vital issue, as the GEF considers its focus for the next phase (GEF7: 2018-2022). Authors Dr Beverley Henry1 Assoc. Professor, Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane. Director, Agri Escondo Pty Ltd. Dr Brian Murphy Visiting Fellow, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra. Honorary Scientific Fellow, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage. Dr Annette Cowie NSW Department of Primary Industries/ Adjunct Professor, University of New England, Armidale. STAP member 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Cover photo: Green terrace rice paddy at Mu Cang Chai, country. Source: Draftangle. Important note The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the STAP or the GEF. The presentation of material and information in this paper does not imply the expression of any opinion, endorsement or recommendations on the part of the GEF. Acknowledgements The authors are grateful to the reviewers who provided expert comment on this paper and particularly to Guadalupe Durón for her management throughout its preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of Land Reuse Structure in Coal Mining Subsided Areas Considering Regional Economic Development: a Case Study in Pei County, China
    sustainability Article Optimization of Land Reuse Structure in Coal Mining Subsided Areas Considering Regional Economic Development: A Case Study in Pei County, China Zhen Li 1, Songlin Wu 2, Shiwen Zhang 3, Chaojia Nie 3, Yong Li 1 and Yuanfang Huang 1,* 1 College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Agricultural Land Quality, Ministry of Natural Resources, Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (North China), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100193, China; [email protected] (Z.L.); [email protected] (Y.L.) 2 Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, Sustainable Minerals Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, Australia; [email protected] 3 College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan 232001, China; [email protected] (S.Z.); [email protected] (C.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 March 2020; Accepted: 13 April 2020; Published: 20 April 2020 Abstract: Land subsidence, which has caused large-scale settlement loss and farmland degradation, was regarded as the main constraint for land reclamation in the High Groundwater Coal Basins (HGCBs) in the eastern China plain. Both coal mining and agricultural production are important for regional development in this area. In general, the land reclamation direction in this area is greatly affected by the adequacy of filling materials and the land use demand of regional economic development. Taking seven coal mining subsided areas in Pei county, located in the eastern China plain, for example, this study proposed an integrated model (including the Limit Condition model, Logistic Regression model, Grey Linear Programming model and the conversion of land use and its effects at small regional extent (CLUE-S) model) to simulate and optimize the post-mining land use structure to meet the economic development needs of Pei county.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation of Degraded Forests in Indonesia
    Rehabilitation of Degraded Forests in Indonesia by Suhardi, Eny Faridah, Handojo HN PART A STATUS OF LAND USE AND FOREST (AND LAND) DEGRADATION 1. Forest Land Use and Land Use Change Forests in Indonesia are sub-divided into three groups based on their function, namely (a) production forest, (b) conservation forest, and (c) protective forest. Seventy-five percent of Indonesia's total land area of 191 million hectares is classified as forest land, and the tropical rain forest component make up the vast majority of forest cover. This is particularly so in Kalimantan, Sumatra, and Irian Jaya. Under Indonesian law a forest is described as an eco- system which has biodiversity dominated by trees. • The production forest is used for the production of timber and non-wood forest produce. • The protection forest is an area earmarked for watershed management, erosion control as well as the conservation of wildlife. • Conservation forests are areas which have been earmarked specifically for the protection of ecosystems including their biological diversity. During the mid-1980s the estimated rate of deforestation varied from 700,000 to more than 1 million hectares per year. According to a critical evaluation of the Indonesian forestry sector, it was found that deforestation could not be blamed on a single major factor but was instead due to a complicated interplay among commercial logging, transmigration program activities and shifting cultivation that is still being practiced largely in Kalimantan. The most immediate threat to Indonesia's forests was the government promotion of domestic timber processing, while the transmigration programme is considered a long-term threat to the forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects of Alternative Copping Systems for Salt- Affected Soils in Ethiopia
    Vol. 9(7), pp. 98-107, July 2018 DOI: 10.5897/JSSEM2018.0686 Articles Number: 975E89557743 ISSN: 2141-2391 Copyright ©2018 Journal of Soil Science and Environmental Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/JSSEM Management Review Prospects of alternative copping systems for salt- affected soils in Ethiopia Asad Sarwar Qureshi1*, Tesfaye Ertebo2 and Melese Mehansiwala3 1International Center for Biosaline Agriculture (ICBA), Dubai, UAE. 2International Center for Biosaline Agriculture (ICBA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 3Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Received 23 May, 2018; Accepted 25 June, 2018 Soil salinization is one of the major constraints in achieving food security and environmental degradation in Ethiopia. Restoration of salt-affected lands into productive lands and protection of newly developed areas from the spread of salinity is therefore of paramount importance. In high salinity areas where technical solutions to soil rehabilitation are expensive and time consuming and growth of normal field crops is restricted, use of bioremediation methods including planting halophytic forages could bring these soils back into production. This paper identifies different causes of salinity and characterizes soils based on severity of salinity levels. The paper suggests that biosaline agriculture is an economical and effective approach to use unproductive lands for growing different food and fodder crops in Ethiopia. This approach, if prudently adapted, can help in improving livelihood of rural and pastoral communities of the salt-affected areas by enhancing feed and fodder production. The paper has recommended many unexplored and unexploited genetic variation that can be harnessed to improve the salt tolerance of field crop species.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: the Case of Greek Lignite Mines
    energies Article Sustainable Rehabilitation of Surface Coal Mining Areas: The Case of Greek Lignite Mines Francis Pavloudakis 1, Christos Roumpos 1,* , Evangelos Karlopoulos 2 and Nikolaos Koukouzas 2 1 Mining Engineering Department, Public Power Corporation, 104 32 Athens, Greece; [email protected] 2 Research Department, Chemical Process & Energy Resources Institute, Centre for Research & Technology Hellas, 15125 Athens, Greece; [email protected] (E.K.); [email protected] (N.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-697-979-9291 Received: 2 July 2020; Accepted: 31 July 2020; Published: 3 August 2020 Abstract: Surface lignite mines of the Balkan Peninsula face growing pressure due to the CO2 emissions reduction initiatives, rapidly increasing renewable-power capacity, and cheap natural gas. In this frame, the development of a modern mine land rehabilitation strategy is considered as a prerequisite for mitigating the social and economic impacts for the local communities. In the case of western Macedonia lignite mines, these prospects are investigated based on a PEST (political, economic, social, technological) analysis of seven alternative land uses. Urban (industrial) development, green houses, and industrial heritage parks are considered as the most appropriate land uses for mitigating the socioeconomic impacts due to the loss of employments. For the land uses occupying large areas (i.e., agriculture, forestry, livestock farming, and photovoltaic parks), an optimisation algorithm is proposed for determining the mix of land uses that maximise revenue, equity, and natural conservation and minimise investment. The algorithm was applied using the opinions of 10 experts, who were involved in mine land reclamation projects carried out in the western Macedonia region in the recent past.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Linkages Among Mining Production and Land Rehabilitation Efficiency in China
    land Article Dynamic Linkages among Mining Production and Land Rehabilitation Efficiency in China Zhen Shi 1 , Yingju Wu 1, Yung-ho Chiu 2,* , Fengping Wu 1 and Changfeng Shi 1 1 Business School, Hohai University, Changzhou 213022, China; [email protected] (Z.S.); [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (F.W.); [email protected] (C.S.) 2 Department of Economics, Soochow University, 56, Kueiyang St., Sec. 1, Taipei 10048, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-2-23111531 (ext. 5201) Received: 6 February 2020; Accepted: 3 March 2020; Published: 6 March 2020 Abstract: In the context of China’s economic transformation, the consumption of mineral resources plays an important role in its economy’s sustainable development, and so improving mining efficiency is regarded as the basis of industrial development. However, in the pursuit of mine exploitation, the destruction of land resources has attracted greater attention by government and society, with many scholars focusing more on land rehabilitation in recent years. Thus, from the perspective of climate change, this research synthetically analyzes the two stages of mining production and land rehabilitation, by applying mining employees, fixed assets’ investment stock, production of non-petroleum mineral resources, accumulated destruction of land area, rehabilitation investment, rehabilitation of land area, and average temperature to the dynamic two-stage directional-distance-function data envelopment analysis (DEA) model under exogenous variables for 29 provinces in China. The results show that the overall efficiency of mining-production-land rehabilitation in most provinces fluctuates around 0.5 and spans a large range of improvement.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of Land Use Promoted by Construction-To-Ecological Land Conversion: a Case Study of Shenzhen City, China
    sustainability Article Sustainability of Land Use Promoted by Construction-to-Ecological Land Conversion: A Case Study of Shenzhen City, China Yunfei Peng 1, Jing Qian 5, Fu Ren 1,2,3, Wenhui Zhang 6 and Qingyun Du 1,2,3,4,* 1 School of Resource and Environmental Science, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China; [email protected] (Y.P.); [email protected] (F.R.) 2 Key Laboratory of GIS, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China 3 Key Laboratory of Digital Mapping and Land Information Application Engineering, National Administration of Surveying, Mapping and Geo-information, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China 4 Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, Wuhan University, 129 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430079, China 5 Shenzhen Urban Planning and Land Resource Research Center, 8009 Hongli Road, Shenzhen 518040, China; [email protected] 6 Shenzhen Institute of Building Research, Co., Ltd., No. 29, 3 Meiao Road, Shenzhen 518049, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-27-8766-4557; Fax: +86-27-6877-8893 Academic Editor: Tan Yigitcanlar Received: 6 June 2016; Accepted: 11 July 2016; Published: 14 July 2016 Abstract: Rapid urbanization and rapid urban growth present great challenges to the sustainable utilization of land resources. This paper discusses the on-going process of construction-to-ecological land conversion (CELC) in terms of three aspects: land use, environmental effects, and system responses. CELC is compared to other current land conversion strategies in China. Taking Shenzhen City as an example, this paper introduces five areas in which CELC has been implemented since 2009, including basic farmland protection zones, mining areas, ecological corridors, inefficient industrial zones, and urban villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Redrawing Soil Salinity Innovation-Focused Stakeholder Interaction for Sustainable Land Management in Khorezm Province, Uzbekistan
    water Article Redrawing Soil Salinity Innovation-Focused Stakeholder Interaction for Sustainable Land Management in Khorezm Province, Uzbekistan Akmal Akramkhanov 1,* ID , Muhammad Mehmood Ul Hassan 2 and Anna-Katharina Hornidge 3,4 ID 1 International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, PO Box 4375, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan 2 World Agroforestry Centre, United Nations Avenue, Nairobi 30677 00100, Kenya; [email protected] 3 Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Fahrenheitstr. 6, Bremen 28359, Germany; [email protected] 4 Institute of Sociology, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Str. 9, Bremen 28359, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 September 2017; Accepted: 29 December 2017; Published: 15 February 2018 Abstract: Addressing soil salinity in irrigated drylands is tightly linked with water and land management decisions thus requiring interdisciplinary engagement. The salinity mapping approaches in Central Asia are undertaken through field sampling and laboratory analysis, which is a time consuming process. As a consequence, salinity maps are not available on time to estimate water requirements to cope with varying levels of soil salinity. Reducing the time lag between assessment and delivery of such maps would enable authorities to determine in advance appropriate water volumes for leaching the salts before and during the growing season. Research initiated in Uzbekistan context explored transdisciplinary and participatory approach to innovation development with local stakeholders. As one of the innovations, an electromagnetic induction meter (EM), a tool for rapid salinity assessment, was chosen and jointly with local salinity mapping related institutions tested, validated, and local capacities for its use developed.
    [Show full text]