DOCSLIB.ORG

The State of the Right to Education Worldwide Free Or Fee: 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The State of the Right to Education Worldwide Free Or Fee: 2006 The State of the Right to Education Worldwide Free or Fee: 2006 Global Report Katarina Tomasevski Copenhagen, August 2006 Katarina Tomasevski - Free or Fee: 2006 Global Report i Table of Contents Preface, acknowledgments and anti-acknowledgments.........................................................x INTRODUCTION Why don’t we have a single global strategy for education? ...............................................xiv How and why the existing global targets nullify human rights? ........................................xix Why education should not have been entrusted to World Bank’s economists? .................xxi How would human rights law alter global targets? ..........................................................xxiv Why are human rights violators bad educators?...............................................................xxvi Why should we care?........................................................................................................xxix SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA Educational toll of World Bank’s recipes..............................................................................1 Freeing education from debt bondage....................................................................................4 Constitutional guarantees versus fiscal policies ....................................................................6 Educational cost of military expenditure ...............................................................................9 Troubling global targetology ...............................................................................................12 Countries providing free primary education Mauritius..............................................................................................................................15 Sao Tomé and Principe ........................................................................................................15 Seychelles ............................................................................................................................16 Countries without free education Angola..................................................................................................................................17 Benin....................................................................................................................................19 Botswana..............................................................................................................................20 Burkina Faso ........................................................................................................................21 Burundi ................................................................................................................................21 Cameroon.............................................................................................................................23 Cape Verde...........................................................................................................................24 Central African Republic .....................................................................................................24 Chad .....................................................................................................................................25 Congo/Brazzaville................................................................................................................26 Congo/Kinshasa ...................................................................................................................28 Côte D’Ivoire .......................................................................................................................29 Equatorial Guinea ................................................................................................................30 Eritrea...................................................................................................................................31 Ethiopia................................................................................................................................32 Gabon...................................................................................................................................35 Gambia.................................................................................................................................35 Ghana ...................................................................................................................................36 Guinea..................................................................................................................................37 Guinea Bissau ......................................................................................................................38 Kenya ...................................................................................................................................39 Lesotho.................................................................................................................................42 Liberia..................................................................................................................................43 Katarina Tomasevski - Free or Fee: 2006 Global Report ii Madagascar ..........................................................................................................................44 Malawi .................................................................................................................................45 Mali......................................................................................................................................47 Mauritania............................................................................................................................48 Mozambique ........................................................................................................................49 Namibia................................................................................................................................50 Niger ....................................................................................................................................51 Nigeria..................................................................................................................................52 Rwanda ................................................................................................................................53 Senegal.................................................................................................................................54 Sierra Leone.........................................................................................................................56 Somalia ................................................................................................................................56 South Africa.........................................................................................................................58 Swaziland.............................................................................................................................62 Tanzania...............................................................................................................................62 Togo .....................................................................................................................................65 Uganda .................................................................................................................................66 Zambia .................................................................................................................................67 Zimbabwe ............................................................................................................................69 EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Transition from the Second to the Third World...................................................................71 The short, sharp shock in education.....................................................................................73 Enter for-fee education ........................................................................................................75 Educational cost of militarization ........................................................................................79 Individual Countries Albania.................................................................................................................................81 Armenia................................................................................................................................83 Azerbaijan............................................................................................................................85 Belarus .................................................................................................................................86 Bosnia and Herzegovina ......................................................................................................87 Bulgaria................................................................................................................................89 Croatia..................................................................................................................................91 Georgia.................................................................................................................................92 Kazakhstan...........................................................................................................................93
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GAISE II Pre-K–12 Report
    Pre-K–12 Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education II (GAISE II) A Framework for Statistics and Data Science Education Writing Committee Anna Bargagliotti (co-chair) Sheri Johnson Loyola Marymount University University of Georgia* Christine Franklin (co-chair) Leticia Perez American Statistical Association University of California Los Angeles Center X Pip Arnold Denise A. Spangler Karekare Education New Zealand University of Georgia Rob Gould University of California Los Angeles The Pre-K–12 Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education II (GAISE II) is an official position of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics as approved by the NCTM Board of Directors, February 2020. Endorsed by the American Statistical Association, November 2020. *Current affiliation -The Mount Vernon School Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Bargagliotti, Anna, author. Title: Pre-K–12 guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II) / writing committee, Anna Bargagliotti (co-chair), Loyola Marymount University, Christine Franklin (co-chair), American Statistical Association, Pip Arnold, Karekare Education New Zealand, Rob Gould, University of California Los Angeles, Sheri Johnson, University of Georgia, Leticia Perez, University of California Los Angeles, Denise A. Spangler, University of Georgia. Other titles: Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report Description: Second edition. | Alexandria, VA : American Statistical Association, 2020. | Includes bibliographical references. | Summary: “This document lays out a curriculum framework for Pre-K–12 educational programs that is designed to help students achieve data literacy and become statistically literate. The framework and subsequent sections in this book recommend curriculum and implementation strategies covering Pre-K–12 statistics education”-- Provided by publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report: Serbia
    Country Report: Serbia 2016 Update Acknowledgements & Methodology This report was written by Pavle Kilibarda and Nikola Kovačević at the Belgrade Centre for Human Rights (BCHR), and was edited by ECRE. The first update was written by Nikola Kovačević at BCHR, and was edited by ECRE. This report draws on the BCHR’s experience in representing asylum seekers and refugees in Serbia, engaging the asylum authorities and monitoring the respect for the right to asylum in the country. The information in this report is up-to-date as of 31 December 2016. The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) The Asylum Information Database (AIDA) is coordinated by the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE). It aims to provide up-to date information on asylum practice in 20 countries. This includes 17 EU Member States (AT, BE, BG, CY, DE, ES, FR, GR, HR, HU, IE, IT, MT, NL, PL, SE, UK) and 3 non-EU countries (Serbia, Switzerland, Turkey) which is easily accessible to the media, researchers, advocates, legal practitioners and the general public through the dedicated website www.asylumineurope.org. Furthermore, the project seeks to promote the implementation and transposition of EU asylum legislation reflecting the highest possible standards of protection in line with international refugee and human rights law and based on best practice. This report is part of the Asylum Information Database (AIDA) funded by the European Programme for Integration and Migration (EPIM), a collaborative initiative of the Network of European Foundations. This report was funded by the European Union with support from the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF).
    [Show full text]
  • The Condition of Education 2005 (NCES 2005–094)
    U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences NCES 2005–094 The Condition of Education 2005 U.S. Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences NCES 2005–094 June 2005 John Wirt Project Director National Center for Education Statistics Susan Choy MPR Associates, Inc. Patrick Rooney William Hussar National Center for Education Statistics Stephen Provasnik Gillian Hampden-Thompson Education Statistics Services Institute Production: Barbara Kridl Managing Editor Andrea Livingston Senior Editor MPR Associates, Inc. U.S. Department of Education Margaret Spellings Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Grover J. Whitehurst Director National Center for Education Statistics Grover J. Whitehurst Acting Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfi lls a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and signifi cance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, the Congress, the states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Examination of the Motivation for Further Education Among Hungarian High School Students in Vojvodina
    DETUROPE – THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM Vol. 12 Issue 3 2020 ISSN 1821-2506 Original scientific paper EXAMINATION OF THE MOTIVATION FOR FURTHER EDUCATION AMONG HUNGARIAN HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN VOJVODINA Boglárka KINCSESa, Sándor PAPPb a Ph.D. student, University of Szeged, Doctoral School of Geosciences, Department of Economic and Social Geography, Egyetem utca 2, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary, [email protected] b Ph.D. student, University of Szeged, Doctoral School of Geosciences, Department of Economic and Social Geography, Egyetem utca 2, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary, [email protected] Cite this article: Kincses, B., Papp, S. (2020). Examination of the motivation for further education among Hungarian high school students in Vojvodina. Deturope, 12(3): 151-168. Abstract The study focuses on the higher education choices of Hungarian-speaking students studying at Serbian high schools in Vojvodina. Due to the disorganized nature of Hungarian-language higher education in Serbia, Hungarian students have little opportunity to study in their mother tongue at state universities and colleges. A questionnaire was distributed among 442 students at 11 high schools in Vojvodina to find out about their intention to study after high school, their reasons for and against higher education in Serbia, and the reasons influencing their choice of higher education institution. The results were analyzed with frequency tables and word clouds. Eighty percent of respondents said they planned to continue their studies after high school. Of those, 72% would like to study in one of the Hungarian higher education institutions, while 25% would like to study in Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Education and the Role of Technology
    Statistics Education and the Role of Technology Gail Burrill Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. The world is changing dramatically. CD’s, the web, caller ID, grocery store debit machines, MRI’s: life today is very different from life thirty years ago. Computer assisted design, spreadsheet cost analysis, simulations, instant communication across cities and nations: the business world is very different from the business world thirty years ago. Information technology is transforming the way we do business and the way we live, and all indications are that even more change is imminent. In education just as in society and in the workforce, technology has the potential to make a profound impact. It can change the nature of the content we teach and the way we teach that content. In statistics, that potential is well on its way to becoming a reality. Although a Danish astronomer, Tyco Brahe, (1546-1601) was one of the first scientists to confront the problem of measurement error (Freedman et al, 1996), even in the early 1700's the nature of statistics was primarily qualitative probably due to the fact that there was very little quantitative data available (Ottaviani, 1989). Quantitative information became a reality in Hungary in 1784 with the first census; the first U.S. census was in 1790. This data was very difficult to manage, and by the late 1880's, a crisis had developed in the attempt to organize and process the large amounts of data collected through the U.S. census. While mathematicians and statisticians had continued over the years to develop statistics as a field, Herman Hollerith in response to this crisis produced a machine that would handle tabulations mechanically (Wallechinsky & Wallace, 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • Research Notes Research Notes
    Research Notes Office of Research and PsychometricsDevelopment RN-23,RN-38, November February 20052009 Advanced Placement® Statistics Students’ Education Choices After High School Brian F. Patterson Introduction were more likely than non-AP examinees to take courses in the discipline of the exam. While Morgan and Maneckshana The College Board’s Advanced Placement® (AP®) Program did not analyze the relationship of AP Statistics participation was founded in 1955 as a national testing program with the and subsequent course taking, they did report a very robust goal of providing high school students opportunities to take finding across 25 exams and 21 colleges and universities. college-level courses. As of the 2009 administration, the AP One study that analyzed the more general relation- Program will consist of 37 courses in 20 different subject ship of high school mathematics and science course work areas. Despite the tremendous growth of the program, the with choice of a math or science major in college was College Board has not been able to systematically track what Trusty (2002). Trusty estimated separate models for men happens to the exam-taking population after they are exam- and women, given previous findings of significant gender ined, nor has it any information on students who take an AP interaction effects. He found that even after controlling course, but not the corresponding AP Exam. for racial/ethnic group, socioeconomic status, eighth-grade There is the expectation that students participating mathematics and science exam scores, and high school edu- in the Advanced Placement Program tend to be more likely cational attitudes and behaviors, course-taking patterns in than nonparticipants to choose postsecondary course work high school do have a significant relationship with choice of that is related to the discipline in which they are examined, a math or science major.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on University Autonomy and the New Law on Higher Education in Serbia
    A Note on University Autonomy and the New Law on Higher Education in Serbia At the invitation of Prof. Fuada Stankovic , Rector of the University of Novi Sad, recent signatory of the Magna Charta Universitatum, the Observatory of the University Fundamenta l Values and Rights, in Bologna, delegated two of its members, Prof. Michael Daxner, former President of the University of Oldenburg and former International Administrator for Education in Kosovo, and Dr. Kenneth Edwards, former Vice -Chancellor of the Univ ersity of Leicester and former President of the Association of European Universities, to discuss with representatives of all universities in Serbia the conditions of academic development - as envisaged by the new law on higher education. They were accompan ied by Dr. Andris Barblan, Secretary General of the Magna Charta Observatory. From a full day of intense discussions, the following paragraphs represent a summary of their understanding of the situation in Serbian higher education at present: A. Context and Challenges Among the countries of South East Europe, Serbia has chosen as guiding principle for its development the compatibility of its structural rules with those defining the transformation of Europe into a community which Serbia would like to join in the future. To reach European compatibility , it can count on its central position in the continent as well as on a high intellectual capacity shaping a system of comprehensive universities that spreads in various parts of the country. It can also prese nt a remarkable set of legal and structural reforms that were discussed and adopted in a short period of time, often with a clear sense of the linkages between various sectors of activity, for instance primary and secondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Minority Education in the Republic of Serbia – a Success Story with Challenges
    Annamária Vicsek Minority Education in the Republic of Serbia – A Success Story with Challenges Abstract Minority education in Serbia dates back to and relies on the policies and practices inherited from the former Yugoslavia, and there is a rather elaborated and sophisticated system of minority education which relies on two strong pillars: one pillar is the right to full education in one’s mother tongue and the other is acquiring the state language to a satisfactory level at the same time. The paper is more of a reflection on the current status and challenges of minority educa- tion from the viewpoint of the author who at the time of writing was serving as state secre- tary in charge of minority education at the Ministry of Education, Science and Technologi- cal Development of the Republic of Serbia. Therefore, the paper should not be considered an academic approach on the matter. Legal Framework of Minority Education The foundation of the right to minority education is embedded in the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, which dedicates an entire section to human and minority rights.1 Among other human and minority rights, the right to preservation of specificity of national minorities is also determined (Article 79). Moreover, the right to education in minority languages in all kinds of educational institutions is also defined in the same article of the Constitution. Article 20 of the Constitution determines that the attained level of human 1 Official Gazette of RS, No. 98/2006, Section II. https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRON- IC/74694/119555/F838981147/SRB74694%20Eng.pdf 85 Hungarian Journal of Minority Studies · Volume II | 2018 and minority rights must not be decreased.
    [Show full text]
  • A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Postsecondary Statistics Education: 40 Years of Research JRTE | Vol
    A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Postsecondary Statistics Education: 40 Years of Research JRTE | Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 253–278 | ©2011 ISTE | iste.org A Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Postsecondary Statistics Education: 40 Years of Research Karen Larwin Youngstown State University David Larwin Kent State University at Salem Abstract The present meta-analysis is a comprehensive investigation of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) on student achievement in postsec- ondary statistics education across a forty year period of time. The researchers calculated an overall effect size of 0.566 from 70 studies, for a total of 219 effect-size measures from a sample of n = 40,125 participants. These results suggest that the typical student moved from the 50th percentile to the 73rd percentile when technology was used as part of the curriculum. This study demonstrates that subcategories can further the understanding of how the use of CAI in statistics education might be maximized. The study discusses im- plications and limitations. (Keywords: statistics education, computer-assisted instruction, meta-analysis) iscovering how students learn most effectively is one of the major goals of research in education. During the last 30 years, many re- Dsearchers and educators have called for reform in the area of statistics education in an effort to more successfully reach the growing population of students, across an expansive variety of disciplines, who are required to complete coursework in statistics (e.g., Cobb, 1993, 2007; Garfield, 1993, 1995, 2002; Giraud, 1997; Hogg, 1991; Lindsay, Kettering, & Siegmund, 2004; Moore, 1997; Roiter, & Petocz, 1996; Snee, 1993;Yilmaz, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Education in Serbia - Numbers and Figures
    13.6.2018. Study Visit with Coordination Meetings University of Twente, Enschede , Netherlands 10th - 14th June 2018 Higher education in Serbia - numbers and figures - Zorana Lužanin University of Novi Sad [email protected] 2017 New Law on Higher Education: external quality control every seven years Action Plan for Implementation of the Strategy ( 90/157 ) 2012 Strategy for Education Development in Serbia 2020 (4/9 ) 2007 Accreditation –” 1st round ” National Council for Higher Education (NCHE) 2006 Commission for Accreditation and Quality Assurance (CAQA) 2005 Law on Higher Education: external quality control every five years ; self- evaluation every three years 2003 Serbia joined the Bologna process 1 13.6.2018. Commission for Accreditation and Quality Assurance: ACCREDITATION EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS ON ACCREDITATION RULES AND REGULATIONS ON STANDARD STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES FOR HIGHER PROCEDURES OF EXTERNAL QUALITY CONTROL EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS AND THEIR (2006) STUDY PROGRAMMES (2006) the process resulting in a formal decision resulting in recommendations instead of decisions evaluation of minimum requirements evaluation of work of a HEI, not in view of (quality threshold): yes/no minimum requirement Higher education institutions (Article 43): 1) universities; 19 2) faculties or academies of arts within universities; 125 3) academies of professional career studies; 0 4) four-year colleges; 3 5) four-year colleges of professional career studies (colleges of applied studies) 55 0 3 19 55 125 2 13.6.2018. HEIs students universities 19 218231 colleges of applied sciences 55 43877 Number of HEIs Number of students on HEIs universities 26% colleges of applied sciences 27% universities colleges of 73% applied sciences 74% HEIs Students 2016/17.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixing the Broken Promise of Education For
    FIXING THE BROKEN PROMISE OF EDUCATION FOR ALL Findings from the Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children FIXING THE BROKEN PROMISE OF EDUCATION FOR ALL Findings from the Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children UNESCO Institute for Statistics The UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS) is the statistical office of UNESCO and is the UN depository for global statistics in the fields of education, science and technology, culture, and communication. The Institute is the official source of data used to monitor progress towards Education for All and related targets of the Millennium Development Goals. The UIS education database is the most comprehensive in the world covering a wide range of indicators—from girls’ enrolment in primary school to the mobility of university students. It is updated three times each year based on results of the UIS annual education survey, which is conducted in more than 200 countries and territories. Established in 1999, the Institute serves Member States and the UN system, as well as inter-governmental and non-governmental organizations, research institutes, universities and citizens interested in high-quality data. Our central goal is to improve the opportunities and living conditions of children and adults around the world by producing the data needed for effective policies and interventions. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) UNICEF promotes the rights and wellbeing of every child, in everything we do. Together with our partners, we work in 190 countries and territories to translate that commitment into practical action, focusing special effort on reaching the most vulnerable and excluded children, to the benefit of all children, everywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sources of Inequity in the Education System of Serbia and How to Combat Them1
    c e p s Journal | Vol.6 | No2 | Year 2016 101 The Sources of Inequity in the Education System of Serbia and How to Combat Them1 Ana Pešikan*2 and Ivan Ivić3 • The concept of equal opportunity for all students is deeply embedded in the Serbian constitution and in education laws. On that level, there is no doubt that everyone is ensured an opportunity to receive quality educa- tion. Many measures in education policy have been created specifically to achieve this objective and make the system fair and inclusive. The Cole- man Report was linked to a wave of optimism that certain educational measures would help in achieving these noble goals. This aim is a high priority in education in a democratic country, and due to its importance needs to be re-examined. Thus, the present research examines the equity of students in the Serbian education system, detecting areas on all edu- cational levels that could be (or already are) systemic sources of inequity (e.g., criteria for preschool institution enrolment, the system of student awards, rationalisation of the school network, the concept of entrance ex- ams to secondary school or university, etc.). A number of measures have already been taken in the system specifically to deal with inequity (e.g., the Preschool Preparatory Programme, dropout measures, inclusion, scholar- ships, etc.). The effects of these measures in particular are analysed in the present work. In addition to an analysis of the systemic sources of inequity in the Serbian education system, the article also makes recommendations for their overcoming. Keywords: equity, sources of inequity, education system, Serbia 1 The work originated within the project “Identification, evaluation and development of cognitive and emotional competences that are important in a society oriented towards European integration”, No.
    [Show full text]