43 A publication of CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS VOL. 80, 2020 The Italian Association of Chemical Engineering Online at www.cetjournal.it Guest Editors: Eliseo Maria Ranzi, Rubens Maciel Filho Copyright © 2020, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. DOI: 10.3303/CET2080008 ISBN 978-88-95608-78-5; ISSN 2283-9216 Comparison of Complete Extractive and Azeotropic Distillation Processes for Anhydrous Ethanol Production using Aspen PlusTM Simulator Nahieh T. Miranda*, Rubens Maciel Filho, Maria Regina Wolf Maciel Laboratory of Optimization, Design, and Advanced Control (LOPCA)/Laboratory of Development of Separation Processes (LDPS), School of Chemical Engineering, University of Campinas, Brazil.
[email protected] Performance of the extractive and azeotropic distillation processes using ethylene glycol and cyclohexane as solvents, respectively, for anhydrous ethanol production, were investigated using 02 RadFrac columns each and solvent recycling streams via simulation in Aspen Plus™ Simulator. Both operate at 1 atm, and feed flow -1 rate equals to 100 kmol.h (ethanol – 0.896 and water – 0.104 in mole fractions at the azeotropic point). The NRTL-RK was the model used for extractive and azeotropic distillations. The anhydrous ethanol purity from top of the 1st column of the extractive distillation (22 stages) was 99.50 % (on a mole basis) and water with nd st 99.20 % of purity at the top of the 2 column. On the other hand, in the azeotropic distillation, the 1 column (30 stages) had a bottom product of anhydrous ethanol purity of 99.99 % and water with 99.99 % of purity in the 2nd column, also at the bottom. Both processes produced anhydrous ethanol with a high-grade purity required by the standard norms ASTM D4806, EN 15376, and ANP 36.