DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF (Figure S26)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF (Figure S26) Tree scale: 0.1 Fervidibacteria bacterium JGI 0000001-G10 contamination screened GBS-A 001 117 2264955041 Chthonomonas calidirosea T49 DSM 23976 Chthonomonas calirisosea T49 DSM 23976 2525259719 Candidatus Protochlamydia amoebophila UWE25 637501474 Symbiobacterium thermophilum IAM 14863 re-annotation 2608094028 Sulfobacillus thermosulfidooxidans DSMAT-1 9293 2506241430 Buchnera aphidicola Sg re-annotation 2607624300 Marinithermus hydrothermalisOceanithermus T1 profundus DSM 14884 506 DSM2504660101 14977 649789985 Deinococcus radioduransATCC BAA-816 637035817 Desulfovibrio magneticus RS-1.1083 644801580 Helicobacter hepaticus 3B1 ATCC 51449 re-annotation 2607801692 Deinococcus misasensis DSM 22328 2571067671 Meiothermus ruber 21 DSM 1279 646673331 Candidatus Blochmannia vafer BVAF 649854767 Rhodopseudomonas palustris BisA53 re-annotation.1123 2607484322 Campylobacter coli CVM N29710 2556024408 Campylobacter ureolyticus ACS-301-V-Sch3b 2559080506 Thermoflexus hugenholtzii JAD2 Draft Genome.1115 2143740193 Truepera radiovictrix RQ-24 DSM 17093 646858387 Candidatus Blochmannia chromaiodes 640 2521990876 Arcobacter nitrofigilis DSM 7299.1367 646815191 Leptonema illini 3055 DSM 21528 2506860732 Helicobacter acinonychis Sheeba 638057548 Hydrogenobaculum sp. Y04AAS1.1298 642750555 Fimbriimonas ginsengisoli Gsoil 348 2559125768 Oceanithermus profundus 506 DSM 14977.1857 649789944 Baumannia cicadellinicola Hc 637981721 Thermoanaerobaculum aquaticum MP-01 2579978622 Candidatus Portiera aleyrodidarum TV 2518564957 Chloroflexus aurantiacus J-10-fl.1419 641373589 Thermovibrio ammonificans HB-1 DSM 15698.1111 649882222 Herpetosiphon aurantiacus DSM 785 2509062064 Gluconobacter oxydans WSH-003 2549816083 Holophaga foetida TMBS4 DSM 6591.1344 2509787342 Kozakia baliensis SR-745 2584326144 Conexibacter woesei ID131577 DSM 14684 646501778 Aquifex aeolicus VF5.1635 637020344Nitratiruptor sp. SB155-2 640819569 Caldilinea aerophila STL-6-01 DSM 14535 2513223202 Psychrobacter sp. PRwf-1 640599912 Acidithiobacillus caldus SM-1 651043877 Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus PAl 5 DSM 5601.1512 641336412 100 gamma proteobacterium sp. HdN1.1886 2511660077 Tolumonas auensis TA 4 DSM 9187 643874135 Anaerolinea thermophila UNI-1 649904556 Geobacter bemidjiensis Bem DSM 16622.1662 642766132 Weeksella virosa 9751 DSM 16922 650482497 Acinetobacter oleivorans DR1 648060746 Hydrogenobaculum sp. Y04AAS1 642750564 Roseiflexus sp. RS-1 640595831 Chromohalobacter salexigens 1H11 DSM 3043 637968334 Rubritalea marina DSM 17716 SAORIC-165 2590799310 Pelobacter carbinolicus DSM 2380 re-annotation 2607640403 Solitalea canadensis USAM 9D DSM 3403.789 2509579665 gamma proteobacterium sp. HdN1 2511660828 Candidatus Entotheonella sp. TSY2 2563963372 Dyadobacter tibetensis Y620-1.999 2586753254 Nitrosococcus halophilus Nc4 646692716 Geobacter uraniireducens Rf4 640547816 Chitinophaga pinensis UQM 2034Sulfurihydrogenibium DSM 2588 644969139 sp. YO3AOP1 642657166 Geopsychrobacter electrodiphilus DSM 16401 2522770125 Leadbetterella byssophila 4M15 DSM 17132.820 649732680 Crenotaleadelta proteobacteriumthermophila DSM NaphS2.1681 14807 2601542956 648669972 58 Fluviicola taffensis RW262 DSM 16823 2503736480 Methylococcus capsulatus Bath 637170525 Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides DSM 22835 2526215975 Acidiphilium cryptum JF-5.714 640553022 Caldithrix abyssi LF13 DSM 13497.965 2562177339 Candidatus Kuenenia stuttgartiensis.1850Gillisia sp. Hel 642555643I 86.1337 2595331630 bacterium JKG1 2541000616 Chitinophaga pinensis UQM 2034 DSM 2588.1582 644965986 Sporocytophaga myxococcoides DSM 11118 2541027769 Calescamantes bacterium SCGC AAA471-M6 contaminationFlavobacterium screened johnsoniae GBS-N 001 UW101 25 2264958556 ATCC 17061 644740635Aquifex aeolicus VF5 637020292 Sulfobacillus acidophilus NAL DSM 10332.1443 2506614835 90 Rubrobacter xylanophilus DSM 9941 638036424 100 Flavobacteriaceae bacterium 3519-10 644939626 Bacteroidetes bacterium FNE-F8 bin 25 2 bact.1467 2596885263 Cytophaga aurantiaca DSM 3654 2515812420 Arcobacter nitrofigilis DSM 7299 646814882 Fibrobacter succinogenes succinogenes S85 ATCC 19169.1160 646370460 Sulfurospirillum arcachonense DSM 9755.1352 2524848317 Spirosoma linguale DSM 74 646499502 100 Desulfobulbus propionicus 1pr3 DSM 2032 649926896 57 Pedobacter saltans Steyn 113 DSM 12145.1327 649983864 96 Thermotoga maritima MSB8 637006502 Desulfurispirillum indicum S5 DSM 22839 649843175 Haliscomenobacter hydrossis O DSM 1100 2504769684 98 Metallosphaera sedula DSM 5348 640507790 Alistipes sp. ZOR0009 2527112994 54 85 94 Gemmatimonas aurantiaca T-27T.1077 643774244 Ehrlichia canis Jake re-annotation 2607010834 Candidatus Solibacter usitatus Ellin6076.1351 639679667 AP Gemmatimonadetes bacterium SCGC AAA003-K101348010218044 2524119389 80 AnaeromyxobacterAcidimicrobium sp. Fw109-5 640845681 ferrooxidans ICP DSM 10331 644951524 Sulfolobus acidocaldarius N8 2524415498 71 Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus Tiberius 2519471229 65 Candidatus Koribacter versatilis Ellin345 637983312 Thermococcus kodakarensis KOD1 re-annotation 2607314188 Gemmatimonadetes bacterium KBS708 2578408886 Sulfolobales archaeon Acd1 2525231993 Treponema sp. SAG7 2509791783 99 100 Sorangium cellulosum So0157-2.563 2563706290 Propionibacterium acnes 266 651118367 Thermofilum pendens Hrk 5 639773865 59 Haliangium ochraceum SMP-2 DSM 14365 646386635 AP ActinobacteriaAP actinobacterium bacterium SCGC SCGC AC-312-N201351631988939.1794 AAA028-N15 1336627476846 2524116074 2524338249 Ignicoccus hospitalis KIN4/I DSM 18386 640897722 62 Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum B.1595 2512359033 CandidatusAcidithrix Microthrix ferrooxidans parvicella Py-F3Jonesia Bio17-1 AFO 2567188664denitrificans 2587990457Atopobium 55134 sp. ICM58DSM 20603 2538572489 645003284 100 Ilumatobacter coccineumPropionibacterium YM16-304.1284 2546182444 freudenreichii shermanii CIRM-BIA1 649640264 Arcanobacterium haemolyticum CCM DSM 20595 646848202 100 Nitriliruptor alkaliphilus DSM 45188 2513186726 Candidatus Korarchaeum cryptofilum OPF8 641613230 Mobiluncus curtisii ATCC 43063 648047695 Thermofilum sp. 2505620323 99 Streptomyces coelicolor A32.1639 637268846 94 96 97 Leptospira biflexa sv. Patoc 1 Ames 642686283 Acidilobus saccharovorans 345-15 648117285 95 Crenarchaeota archaeon SCGC AAA471-O08 contamination screened GBS-N 001 29 2264867704 Aeropyrum camini SY1 JCM 12091 2556043927 56 Leptospira borgpetersenii sv. Hardjo-bovis L550 639656974 99 64 66 100 70 62 68 Fervidicoccus fontis Kam940 2514086899 77 94 55zeta proteobacterium SCGC AB-133-G06.1825 2264882311 Thaumarchaeota archaeon DS1 Dragon Thaumarchaeon 2263082816 100 IgnavibacteriumChloroherpeton album thalassium Mat9-16 ATCC JCM 1651135110.669 2514223700 642718389 Turneriella parva H DSM 21527 2506605018 64 Rhodothermus marinus R-10 DSM 4252 646410537 Thermodesulforhabdus norvegica DSM 9990 2599302638 54 Aminicenantes bacterium JGI 0000014-B08 contamination screened Etoliko 001 226 2265038112 Pyrobaculum islandicum DSM 4184.515 639783402 Pyrolobus fumarii 1A DSM 11204 2505690300 97 Geoarchaeota archaeon OSPB-1 8 best scaffolds 2504813064 99 NitrospinaKtedonobacter sp. SCGC racemifer AAA288-L16 SOSP1-21 2264263600 DSM 44963.1882 648605684 Hyperthermus butylicus DSM 5456 640081800 Desulfovermiculus halophilus DSM 18834 2558084374 HippeaThermobaculum maritima MH2 terrenum DSM 10411 YNP1 2504136247 ATCC BAA-798 646440071 Pyrobaculum arsenaticum PZ6 DSM 13514.983 640469832 100 Nitrospina sp. SCGC AAA288-L16.1695 2264263095 72 ThermomicrobiumPhycisphaera roseum DSM mikurensis 5159 643625174 NBRC 102666 2562259987 63 Geobacter uraniireducens Rf4.1416 640551709 Thermoproteus uzoniensis 768-20.892 650771298 GemmataPlanctomyces obscuriglobus limnophilus UQM 2246 Mu 290642222978 DSM 3776.733 646789588 86 Pirellula staleyi DSM 6068.602 646478078 66 SingulisphaeraIsosphaera acidiphila pallida MOB10 IS1B DSM ATCC 18658.1485 43644 649911973 2509619317 Pyrobaculum islandicum DSM 4184 639784710 67 84 63 100 Desulfovibrio desulfuricans desulfuricans ATCC 27774 643582468 Thermoproteus uzoniensis 768-20 650772475 72 86 65 94 Thermodesulfatator indicus CIR29812 DSM 15286 2505284957 73 Candidatus MagnetobacteriumAzoarcus toluclasticus sp. MYR-1 ATCC 2586913386 700605.781 2518923217 Ferroglobus placidus AEDII12DO DSM 10642 646612834 100 90 Candidatus Nitrospira defluvii.1895 649658772 55 Candidatus Entotheonella sp. TSY2.1885 2563963368 Candidatus Chloracidobacterium thermophilum B 2512360915 Archaeoglobus profundus Av18 DSM 5631 646510283 Candidatus Koribacter versatilis Ellin345.1275 637983305 65 99 Candidatus Solibacter usitatus Ellin6076 639685213 Archaeoglobus veneficus SNP6 DSM 11195 2504145093 60 98 85 88 Acidobacteriaceae bacterium KBS 96 DSM 24297.1530 2522227550 89 93 Bryobacter aggregatus DSM 18758.1413 2562803776 Caldivirga maquilingensis IC-167 641275785 100 Holophaga foetida TMBS4 DSM 6591 2509787193 Singulisphaera acidiphila MOB10 DSM 18658 2509622579 Vulcanisaeta distributa DSM 14429 648202454 89 Verrucomicrobia bacterium SCGC AAA164-E04.1390 2236430667 100 Acidobacterium capsulatum ATCC 51196.1685 643768772 Geodermatophilus obscurus G-20 DSM 43160 646517372 73 98 70 Opitutaceae sp. TAV1 2508839915 Streptomyces griseus griseus NBRC 13350 641695087 100 ThermodesulfovibrioAcidobacteriaceae yellowstonii DSM 11347.23 bacterium 643375170 URHE0068.810 2556998364 Micromonospora sp. L5.1353 649814389 Thermodesulfovibrio yellowstonii DSM 11347 643375359 1 Thermodesulfobacterium thermophilum DSM 1276.1498 2523967454 Thermodesulfobium narugense Na82 DSM 14796 2504785159 Streptosporangium
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microbial Diversity in Raw Milk and Sayram Ketteki from Southern of Xinjiang, China
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.435442; this version posted March 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Microbial diversity in raw milk and Sayram Ketteki from southern of Xinjiang, China DongLa Gao1,2，Weihua Wang1,2*，ZhanJiang Han1,3，Qian Xi1,2, ，RuiCheng Guo1,2，PengCheng Kuang1,2，DongLiang Li1,2 1 College of Life Science, Tarim University, Alaer, Xinjiang , China 2 Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Deep Processing of Agricultural Products in South Xinjiang, Alar, Xinjiang ,China 3 Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Alar, Xinjiang , China *Corresponding author E-mail: [email protected]（Weihua Wang） bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.15.435442; this version posted March 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Abstract Raw milk and fermented milk are rich in microbial resources, which are essential for the formation of texture, flavor and taste. In order to gain a deeper knowledge of the bacterial and fungal community diversity in local raw milk and home-made yogurts
    [Show full text]
  • Global Metagenomic Survey Reveals a New Bacterial Candidate Phylum in Geothermal Springs
    ARTICLE Received 13 Aug 2015 | Accepted 7 Dec 2015 | Published 27 Jan 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10476 OPEN Global metagenomic survey reveals a new bacterial candidate phylum in geothermal springs Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh1, David Paez-Espino1, Jessica Jarett1, Peter F. Dunfield2, Brian P. Hedlund3, Anne E. Dekas4, Stephen E. Grasby5, Allyson L. Brady6, Hailiang Dong7, Brandon R. Briggs8, Wen-Jun Li9, Danielle Goudeau1, Rex Malmstrom1, Amrita Pati1, Jennifer Pett-Ridge4, Edward M. Rubin1,10, Tanja Woyke1, Nikos C. Kyrpides1 & Natalia N. Ivanova1 Analysis of the increasing wealth of metagenomic data collected from diverse environments can lead to the discovery of novel branches on the tree of life. Here we analyse 5.2 Tb of metagenomic data collected globally to discover a novel bacterial phylum (‘Candidatus Kryptonia’) found exclusively in high-temperature pH-neutral geothermal springs. This lineage had remained hidden as a taxonomic ‘blind spot’ because of mismatches in the primers commonly used for ribosomal gene surveys. Genome reconstruction from metagenomic data combined with single-cell genomics results in several high-quality genomes representing four genera from the new phylum. Metabolic reconstruction indicates a heterotrophic lifestyle with conspicuous nutritional deficiencies, suggesting the need for metabolic complementarity with other microbes. Co-occurrence patterns identifies a number of putative partners, including an uncultured Armatimonadetes lineage. The discovery of Kryptonia within previously studied geothermal springs underscores the importance of globally sampled metagenomic data in detection of microbial novelty, and highlights the extraordinary diversity of microbial life still awaiting discovery. 1 Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA. 2 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Sediments Illuminate Chlamydiae Diversity and Evolution
    Supplementary Information for: Marine sediments illuminate Chlamydiae diversity and evolution Jennah E. Dharamshi1, Daniel Tamarit1†, Laura Eme1†, Courtney Stairs1, Joran Martijn1, Felix Homa1, Steffen L. Jørgensen2, Anja Spang1,3, Thijs J. G. Ettema1,4* 1 Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75123 Uppsala, Sweden 2 Department of Earth Science, Centre for Deep Sea Research, University of Bergen, N-5020 Bergen, Norway 3 Department of Marine Microbiology and Biogeochemistry, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, and Utrecht University, NL-1790 AB Den Burg, The Netherlands 4 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Agrotechnology and Food Sciences, Wageningen University, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands. † These authors contributed equally * Correspondence to: Thijs J. G. Ettema, Email: [email protected] Supplementary Information Supplementary Discussions ............................................................................................................................ 3 1. Evolutionary relationships within the Chlamydiae phylum ............................................................................. 3 2. Insights into the evolution of pathogenicity in Chlamydiaceae ...................................................................... 8 3. Secretion systems and flagella in Chlamydiae .............................................................................................. 13 4. Phylogenetic diversity of chlamydial nucleotide transporters. ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Balanced View of the Bacterial Tree of Life Frederik Schulz*, Emiley A
    Schulz et al. Microbiome (2017) 5:140 DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0360-9 SHORTREPORT Open Access Towards a balanced view of the bacterial tree of life Frederik Schulz*, Emiley A. Eloe-Fadrosh, Robert M. Bowers, Jessica Jarett, Torben Nielsen, Natalia N. Ivanova, Nikos C. Kyrpides and Tanja Woyke* Abstract The bacterial tree of life has recently undergone significant expansion, chiefly from candidate phyla retrieved through genome-resolved metagenomics. Bypassing the need for genome availability, we present a snapshot of bacterial phylogenetic diversity based on the recovery of high-quality SSU rRNA gene sequences extracted from nearly 7000 metagenomes and all available reference genomes. We illuminate taxonomic richness within established bacterial phyla together with environmental distribution patterns, providing a revised framework for future phylogeny-driven sequencing efforts. Keywords: Bacteria, Bacterial diversity, Tree of life, Small subunit (SSU) rRNA, Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR), Microbial dark matter (MDM), Metagenomics, Novel bacterial lineages Main text clades [7, 8], as achieved by data de-replication after Bacteria are major drivers of global biogeochemical cycles, clustering. We constructed a robust phylogeny from all impacting the environment, animal and plant health, and SSU rRNA gene sequences extracted from metagenomes theevolutionarytrajectoryoflifeonEarth.Modern and high-quality reference genomes available through molecular approaches have provided a means to construct the Integrated Microbial Genomes with Microbiome
    [Show full text]
  • Phototrophic Methane Oxidation in a Member of the Chloroflexi Phylum
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/531582; this version posted January 26, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Phototrophic Methane Oxidation in a Member of the Chloroflexi Phylum Lewis M. Ward1,2, Patrick M. Shih3,4, James Hemp5, Takeshi Kakegawa6, Woodward W. Fischer7, Shawn E. McGlynn2,8,9 1. Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA. 2. Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA USA. 4. Department of Energy, Joint BioEnergy Institute, Emeryville, CA USA. 5. School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT USA. 6. Department of Geosciences, Tohoku University, Sendai City, Japan 7. Division of Geological & Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA USA. 8. Biofunctional Catalyst Research Team, RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Wako-shi Japan 9. Blue Marble Space Institute of Science, Seattle, WA, USA Abstract: Biological methane cycling plays an important role in Earth’s climate and the global carbon cycle, with biological methane oxidation (methanotrophy) modulating methane release from numerous environments including soils, sediments, and water columns. Methanotrophy is typically coupled to aerobic respiration or anaerobically via the reduction of sulfate, nitrate, or metal oxides, and while the possibility of coupling methane oxidation to phototrophy (photomethanotrophy) has been proposed, no organism has ever been described that is capable of this metabolism.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded Diversity of Microbial Groups That Shape the Dissimilatory Sulfur Cycle
    The ISME Journal (2018) 12:1715–1728 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0078-0 ARTICLE Expanded diversity of microbial groups that shape the dissimilatory sulfur cycle 1,2 3 4,11 5 1 Karthik Anantharaman ● Bela Hausmann ● Sean P. Jungbluth ● Rose S. Kantor ● Adi Lavy ● 6 7 8 3 1 Lesley A. Warren ● Michael S. Rappé ● Michael Pester ● Alexander Loy ● Brian C. Thomas ● Jillian F. Banfield 1,9,10 Received: 11 October 2017 / Revised: 10 January 2018 / Accepted: 13 January 2018 / Published online: 21 February 2018 © The Author(s) 2018. This article is published with open access Abstract A critical step in the biogeochemical cycle of sulfur on Earth is microbial sulfate reduction, yet organisms from relatively few lineages have been implicated in this process. Previous studies using functional marker genes have detected abundant, novel dissimilatory sulfite reductases (DsrAB) that could confer the capacity for microbial sulfite/sulfate reduction but were not affiliated with known organisms. Thus, the identity of a significant fraction of sulfate/sulfite-reducing microbes has remained elusive. Here we report the discovery of the capacity for sulfate/sulfite reduction in the genomes of organisms from 1234567890();,: 13 bacterial and archaeal phyla, thereby more than doubling the number of microbial phyla associated with this process. Eight of the 13 newly identified groups are candidate phyla that lack isolated representatives, a finding only possible given genomes from metagenomes. Organisms from Verrucomicrobia and two candidate phyla, Candidatus Rokubacteria and Candidatus Hydrothermarchaeota, contain some of the earliest evolved dsrAB genes. The capacity for sulfite reduction has been laterally transferred in multiple events within some phyla, and a key gene potentially capable of modulating sulfur metabolism in associated cells has been acquired by putatively symbiotic bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Metagenomics Roadmap to the Uncultured Genome Diversity in Hypersaline Soda Lake Sediments Charlotte D
    Vavourakis et al. Microbiome (2018) 6:168 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0548-7 RESEARCH Open Access A metagenomics roadmap to the uncultured genome diversity in hypersaline soda lake sediments Charlotte D. Vavourakis1 , Adrian-Stefan Andrei2†, Maliheh Mehrshad2†, Rohit Ghai2, Dimitry Y. Sorokin3,4 and Gerard Muyzer1* Abstract Background: Hypersaline soda lakes are characterized by extreme high soluble carbonate alkalinity. Despite the high pH and salt content, highly diverse microbial communities are known to be present in soda lake brines but the microbiome of soda lake sediments received much less attention of microbiologists. Here, we performed metagenomic sequencing on soda lake sediments to give the first extensive overview of the taxonomic diversity found in these complex, extreme environments and to gain novel physiological insights into the most abundant, uncultured prokaryote lineages. Results: We sequenced five metagenomes obtained from four surface sediments of Siberian soda lakes with a pH 10 and a salt content between 70 and 400 g L−1. The recovered 16S rRNA gene sequences were mostly from Bacteria,evenin the salt-saturated lakes. Most OTUs were assigned to uncultured families. We reconstructed 871 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) spanning more than 45 phyla and discovered the first extremophilic members of the Candidate Phyla Radiation (CPR). Five new species of CPR were among the most dominant community members. Novel dominant lineages were found within previously well-characterized functional groups involved in carbon, sulfur, and nitrogen cycling. Moreover, key enzymes of the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway were encoded within at least four bacterial phyla never previously associated with this ancient anaerobic pathway for carbon fixation and dissimilation, including the Actinobacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Analysis
    Report Microbial Analysis Submitted to XXXXXXXXXXXX December 7, 2015 Submitted by Trevor Ghylin, P.E., PhD www.microbedetectives.com [email protected] Executive Summary The DNA data revealed the following: - Two samples were very similar even though one came from a system with an anaerobic zone and one did not - Traditional AOB and NOB were not detected at all indicating potential for SND (simultaneous nitrification denitrification) by non-traditional AOB/NOB - PAOs were detected in somewhat low abundance but relatives of known PAOs were also detected - A small amount of iron oxidizing bacteria were detected in Basin 7 but not basin 6 - Filaments and foaming were not abundant - Some nitrogen fixing bacteria were detected indicating potential for nitrogen limitation - Sulfate reducing bacteria were detected. Some have been associated with high alkalinity and thermophilic conditions. This is unusual for municipal wastewater - Photosynthetic bacteria were detected indicating potential growth in clarifiers or other sun-exposed locations Background 2 samples were received by Microbe Detectives on 11/13/15 labelled: AerationBasin6_S2 AerationBasin7_S3 DNA results and analysis of this sample are presented below. Results DNA data are displayed in Table 1 and the DNAmyWastewater™ tables. The data in these tables is a subset of the total data, focusing on bacteria that are typically important in wastewater systems. The full data is also provided in a spreadsheet. Data presented are bacterial relative abundance (% of total bacteria in the sample). For example 0.12% Actinobacteria means that 0.12% of bacteria in the sample are Actinobacteria. The two samples had very similar bacterial communities even though they were apparently collected from different systems where one system includes an anaerobic environment and the other does not.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S9 Significant Correlations Between
    Supplementary Table S9 Significant correlations between individual taxa at a high taxonomic level (Phylum or Class) and NMR PHYLUM_LEVEL ALL _SOIL r p Actinobacteria NMR -0.283 0.002 Chloroflexi NMR -0.310 0.001 Elusimicrobia NMR 0.277 0.003 AGRICULTURE _SOIL r p Chloroflexi NMR -0.279 0.013 Cyanobacteria NMR 0.227 0.046 Elusimicrobia NMR 0.342 0.002 Spirochaetes NMR 0.224 0.049 NATURAL _SOIL r p Actinobacteria NMR -0.348 0.038 Chloroflexi NMR -0.337 0.044 Verrucomicrobia NMR 0.333 0.047 0-15CM _SOIL r p Actinobacteria NMR -0.272 0.026 Chloroflexi NMR -0.255 0.037 Elusimicrobia NMR 0.244 0.047 GAL15 NMR -0.266 0.030 15-30CM _SOIL r p Euryarchaeota NMR 0.292 0.047 Chloroflexi NMR -0.353 0.015 Elusimicrobia NMR 0.294 0.045 2012_depth_0-15 Acidobacteria NMR 0.586 0.004 Actinobacteria NMR -0.427 0.047 Chloroflexi NMR -0.429 0.047 WS3 NMR 0.470 0.027 [Caldithrix] NMR 0.497 0.019 [Thermi] NMR -0.428 0.047 2013_depth_0-15 GAL15 NMR -0.418 0.047 2013_depth_15-30 Euryarchaeota NMR 0.478 0.021 Armatimonadetes NMR -0.481 0.020 Chloroflexi NMR -0.497 0.016 2014_depth_0-15 Cyanobacteria NMR 0.451 0.035 Fibrobacteres NMR 0.454 0.034 WS3 NMR -0.508 0.016 2014_depth_15-30 Actinobacteria NMR -0.466 0.029 Elusimicrobia NMR 0.435 0.043 Spirochaetes NMR 0.473 0.026 agriculture_depth_0-15 Cyanobacteria NMR 0.353 0.017 Gemmatimonadetes NMR 0.369 0.013 NC10 NMR -0.323 0.031 agriculture_depth_15-30 Elusimicrobia NMR 0.426 0.013 Spirochaetes NMR 0.354 0.043 natural_depth_0-15 NONE natural_depth_15-30 Unclassified NMR -0.579 0.030 CLASS_LEVEL ALL _SOIL r p Chlorobi;c__BSV26
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Community Structure Analysis in Acer Palmatum Bark and Isolation of Novel Bacteria IAD-21 of the Phylum Abditibacteriota (Former Candidate Division FBP)
    Microbial community structure analysis in Acer palmatum bark and isolation of novel bacteria IAD-21 of the phylum Abditibacteriota (former candidate division FBP) Kazuki Kobayashi1 and Hideki Aoyagi1,2 1 Division of Life Sciences and Bioengineering, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan 2 Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan ABSTRACT Background: The potential of unidentified microorganisms for academic and other applications is limitless. Plants have diverse microbial communities associated with their biomes. However, few studies have focused on the microbial community structure relevant to tree bark. Methods: In this report, the microbial community structure of bark from the broad-leaved tree Acer palmatum was analyzed. Both a culture-independent approach using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and next generation sequencing, and bacterial isolation and sequence-based identification methods were used to explore the bark sample as a source of previously uncultured microorganisms. Molecular phylogenetic analyses based on PCR-amplified 16S rDNA sequences were performed. Results: At the phylum level, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes were relatively abundant in the A. palmatum bark. In addition, microorganisms from the phyla Acidobacteria, Gemmatimonadetes, Verrucomicrobia, Armatimonadetes, and Submitted 2 February 2019 Abditibacteriota, which contain many uncultured microbial species, existed in the Accepted 12 September 2019 A. palmatum bark. Of the 30 genera present at relatively high abundance in the bark, Published 29 October 2019 some genera belonging to the phyla mentioned were detected. A total of 70 isolates Corresponding author could be isolated and cultured using the low-nutrient agar media DR2A and Hideki Aoyagi, PE03.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Analysis of Planctomycetes Inhabiting Blades of the Red Alga Porphyra Umbilicalis
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Genome Analysis of Planctomycetes Inhabiting Blades of the Red Alga Porphyra umbilicalis Jay W. Kim1*, Susan H. Brawley2, Simon Prochnik3, Mansi Chovatia3, Jane Grimwood3,4, Jerry Jenkins3,4, Kurt LaButti3, Konstantinos Mavromatis3, Matt Nolan3, Matthew Zane3, Jeremy Schmutz3,4, John W. Stiller5, Arthur R. Grossman6 1 Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States of America, 2 School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States of America, 3 Department of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California, United States of America, 4 HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama, United States of America, 5 Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America, 6 Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California, United States of America * [email protected] OPEN ACCESS Citation: Kim JW, Brawley SH, Prochnik S, Chovatia Abstract M, Grimwood J, Jenkins J, et al. (2016) Genome Analysis of Planctomycetes Inhabiting Blades of the Porphyra is a macrophytic red alga of the Bangiales that is important ecologically and eco- Red Alga Porphyra umbilicalis. PLoS ONE 11(3): e0151883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151883 nomically. We describe the genomes of three bacteria in the phylum Planctomycetes (des- ignated P1, P2 and P3) that were isolated from blades of Porphyra umbilicalis (P.um.1). Editor: Jean-François Pombert, Illinois Institute of Technology, UNITED STATES These three Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) belong to distinct genera; P2 belongs to the genus Rhodopirellula, while P1 and P3 represent undescribed genera within the Planc- Received: August 27, 2015 tomycetes.
    [Show full text]
  • Fimbriimonadia in the Phylum Armatimonadetes
    The First Complete Genome Sequence of the Class Fimbriimonadia in the Phylum Armatimonadetes Zi-Ye Hu1., Yue-Zhu Wang2., Wan-Taek Im3, Sheng-Yue Wang2, Guo-Ping Zhao1,2, Hua-Jun Zheng2,4*, Zhe-Xue Quan1* 1 Department of Microbiology and Microbial Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2 Shanghai-MOST Key Laboratory of Health and Disease Genomics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 3 Department of Biotechnology, Hankyoung National Univeristy, Kyonggi-do, Republic of Korea, 4 Laboratory of Medical Foods, Shanghai Institute of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai, China Abstract In this study, we present the complete genome of Fimbriimonas ginsengisoli Gsoil 348T belonging to the class Fimbriimonadia of the phylum Armatimonadetes, formerly called as candidate phylum OP10. The complete genome contains a single circular chromosome of 5.23 Mb including a 45.5 kb prophage. Of the 4820 open reading frames (ORFs), 3,000 (62.2%) genes could be classified into Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) families. With the split of rRNA genes, strain Gsoil 348T had no typical 16S-23S-5S ribosomal RNA operon. In this genome, the GC skew inversion which was usually observed in archaea was found. The predicted gene functions suggest that the organism lacks the ability to synthesize histidine, and the TCA cycle is incomplete. Phylogenetic analyses based on ribosomal proteins indicated that strain Gsoil 348T represents a deeply branching lineage of sufficient divergence with other phyla, but also strongly involved in superphylum Terrabacteria. Citation: Hu Z-Y, Wang Y-Z, Im W-T, Wang S-Y, Zhao G-P, et al.
    [Show full text]