DOCSLIB.ORG

Enterprise Products Partners L.P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Enterprise Products Partners L.P Cover 4/12/2000 1:34 PM Page cvr1 Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 1999 Annual Report Cover 4/12/2000 1:34 PM Page cvr2 Company Profile Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is one of the largest publicly traded master limited partnerships with an enterprise value of approximately $2 billion. Enterprise is a leading integrated provider of processing, fractionation, storage, transportation and terminalling services to producers and consumers of natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) and other liquid hydrocarbons. The Company’s assets are geographically focused on the United States’ Gulf Coast, which accounts for approximately 55 percent of domestic NGL production and 75 percent of domestic NGL demand. Financial Highlights Amounts in 000s except per unit amounts 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Income Statement Data: Total revenues $ 1,346,456 $ 754,573 $ 1,035,963 $ 1,015,262 $ 802,354 Gross operating margin (1) $ 179,195 $ 99,627 $ 128,710 $ 137,937 $ 104,774 Operating income $ 132,351 $ 50,473 $ 75,680 $ 84,668 $ 61,845 Income before extraordinary charge and minority interest $ 121,521 $ 37,355 $ 52,690 $ 61,427 $ 35,137 Extraordinary charge on early extinguishment of debt $ — $ (27,176) $ — $ — $ — Net Income $ 120,295 $ 10,077 $ 52,163 $ 60,813 $ 34,786 Basic Earnings per Unit Income before extraordinary item and minority interest per unit $ 1.80 $ 0.62 $ 0.95 $ 1.11 $ 0.63 Net income per unit $ 1.79 $ 0.17 $ 0.94 $ 1.10 $ 0.63 Number of units used for basic calculation 66,710.4 60,124.4 54,962.8 54,962.8 54,962.8 Diluted Earnings per Unit Income before extraordinary item and minority interest per unit $ 1.65 $ 0.62 $ 0.95 $ 1.11 $ 0.63 Net income per unit $ 1.64 $ 0.17 $ 0.94 $ 1.10 $ 0.63 Number of units for fully diluted calculation 72,788.5 60,124.4 54,962.8 54,962.8 54,962.8 Balance Sheet Data: Total assets $ 1,494,952 $ 741,037 $ 697,713 $ 711,151 $ 610,931 Total debt $ 295,000 $ 90,000 $ 230,237 $ 255,617 $ 281,656 Total equity $ 789,465 $ 562,536 $ 311,885 $ 266,021 $ 198,815 % of total debt to total debt and equity 27.2% 13.8% 42.5% 49.0% 58.6% Other Financial Data: Cash flow from operating activities $ 168,810 $ (20,294) $ 57,795 $ 91,431 $ 12,212 Cash flow from investing activities $ (265,221) $ (50,695) $ (30,982) $ (57,725) $ (9,233) Cash flow from financing activities $ 77,538 $ 61,238 $ (26,551) $ (24,930) $ 11,995 EBITDA (2) $ 147,050 $ 55,472 $ 79,882 $ 87,109 $ 65,406 EBITDA of unconsolidated affiliates (3) $ 23,425 $ 23,912 $ 24,372 $ 25,012 $ 18,520 Total “Lookthrough” EBITDA (4) $ 170,475 $ 79,384 $ 104,254 $ 112,121 $ 83,926 Cash distributions declared per Common Unit (5) $ 1.85 $ 0.77 (5) (5) (5) (5) (1) Gross operating margin represents earnings before depreciation, lease expense obligations retained by the Company’s largest unitholder, Enterprise Products Company (“EPCO”), gain or loss from sale of assets and general and administrative expenses. Gross margin also includes the Company’s equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates. (2) EBTIDA is defined as net income plus depreciation and amortization and interest expense less equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates. EBITDA for 1998 excludes the extraordinary charge of $27,176 related to the early extinguishment of debt. A complete description of EBTIDA is described in footnote (4) on page 32 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K. (3) Represents Enterprise’s pro rata share of EBITDA of the unconsolidated affiliates. (4)Total of EBITDA and EBITDA of unconsolidated affiliates. (5) The Company began distributing cash to its partnership units after its initial public offering of Common Units on July 27, 1998. Narrative 4/12/2000 1:31 PM Page 1 Dear Unitholders 1999 was a significant year for Enterprise. We generated record earnings and cash flow that surpassed any year since the company’s formation in 1968. During the year, we completed several strategic acquisitions that broadened our platform for growth. These were complementary to our existing asset base and were immediately accretive to earnings and cash flow. As a result of our earnings expansion and our confidence in Enterprise’s future, we announced an 11 percent increase in our annual cash distribution rate to $2.00 per unit. We also enhanced Enterprise’s ability to capitalize on emerging growth opportunities in the midstream energy sector. And, most importantly, we delivered on the goals that we outlined to our unitholders a year ago. Record Earnings By every measure, Enterprise reported strong financial performance during 1999. Our revenues increased to over $1.3 billion in 1999 compared to $755 million in 1998. Net income for 1999 was $120 million, or $1.64 per unit on a fully diluted basis, versus an adjusted net income of $37 million, or $0.62 per unit, for 1998. Gross operating margin increased by 80% to $179 million from approximately $100 million in 1998. This improvement was led by the Company’s Fractionation and Processing segments During the year, we completed several which benefited from increased demand for natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), resulting in increased strategic acquisitions volumes, improved margins, and a strong price environment for natural gas processing. that broadened our platform for growth. $Millions 1999 1998 Change These were comple- Gross Operating Margin by Segment: mentary to our exist- Processing $ 36.8 $ (0.6) $ 37.4 ing asset base and Fractionation 106.3 66.6 39.7 Pipeline 27.0 27.3 (0.3) were immediately Octane Enhancement 8.2 9.8 (1.6) accretive to earnings Otheroooooooooo 0.9 oooooooooo (3.5) oooooooooo 4.4 and cash flow. Total $ 179.2 $ 99.6 $ 79.6 Two significant acquisitions completed during the second half of 1999 were immediately accretive to net income and cash flow. These were the purchase of Tejas Natural Gas Liquids, LLC (“Tejas NGL”), which had an effective date of August 1, 1999, and the acquisition of an additional 25.5 percent ownership interest in our 210,000 barrel per day NGL fractionation facility in Mont Belvieu, Texas, which was effective July 1, 1999. Net income also benefited from four joint venture projects that began commercial operations late in the year. Two NGL pipelines, Tri-States and Wilprise, became operational during the second quarter and began contributing to earnings during the second half of the year. A 60,000 barrel per day NGL fractionator located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and a refrigerated propane and butane export terminal on the Houston Ship Channel started operations late in the third quarter. In 2000, we will benefit from a full year of net income from these projects and acquisitions. Strategic Acquisitions In 1999, we acquired over $500 million in assets. These businesses broadened our array of services further upstream to include natural gas processing and the transportation of unfractionated NGLs. Focused on the Gulf Coast, we significantly expanded 1 Narrative 4/12/2000 1:31 PM Page 2 our asset base in Louisiana and Mississippi with facilities that are complementary to our existing platform of assets and provide additional volumes for our downstream processing, transportation and storage businesses. As a result of these acquisitions and investments in joint ventures, total assets at December 31, 1999 more than doubled to $1.5 billion from $741 million at the end of 1998. In our brief public history, Enterprise has already become one of the largest publicly traded partnerships with an enterprise value (market capitalization plus debt) of approximately $2 billion. The most significant of these transactions was the acquisition of Tejas NGL, which was Shell Oil Company’s natural gas processing and NGL business in Louisiana and Mississippi. This acquisition united our substantial NGL fractionation, storage, transportation and distribution system with Tejas NGL’s large upstream NGL supply position. It is anchored by a 20-year contract for the rights to process Shell’s current and future natural gas production from the Gulf of Mexico. Through this transaction, we have established a strategic partnership with one of the largest oil and gas producers and leaseholders in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Based on the cash Enterprise has now established a strong presence across the entire NGL value chain on the generating capacity of Gulf Coast. The Gulf Coast is the largest NGL supply and market area in the United States and our portfolio of the gateway to global supplies and markets. By having an integrated business position across fee-based businesses each segment of the value chain, we believe we can extract more value for our unitholders and and our confidence in provide additional benefits for our customers by providing integrated, or bundled, services Enterprise’s prospects unique to the NGL marketplace. for the future, we In exchange for Tejas NGL, Shell received total consideration valued at $375 million consisting increased the annual cash distribution rate of $166 million in cash and 14.5 million Special Units, which convert to Common Units on a 1:1 by $0.20 per unit to basis through 2002. These Special Units represent a 17.6 percent direct ownership position in $2.00 per unit effective Enterprise. Shell has the opportunity to earn an additional 6.0 million convertible Contingency with the distribution of Units, which would increase its direct ownership position to 23.2 percent, contingent upon their fourth quarter 1999 delivering a targeted volume of natural gas to Enterprise for processing during 2000 and 2001. No cash. cash distributions are paid or accrue to the Special or Contingency Units prior to conversion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enterprise Products Partners Lp
    ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L . P. ANALYST DAY March 4, 2021 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements based on the beliefs of the company, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to our management team (including information published by third parties). When used in this presentation, words such as “anticipate,” “project,” “expect,” “plan,” “seek,” “goal,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “will,” “believe,” “may,” “scheduled,” “potential” and similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and objectives for future operations, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expected, including insufficient cash from operations, adverse market conditions, governmental regulations, the possibility that tax or other costs or difficulties related thereto will be greater than expected, the impact of competition and other risk factors discussed in our latest filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements attributable to Enterprise or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained herein, in such filings and in our future periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update or revise our forward- looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • February 14, 2006
    Enterprise Products Partners, Enterprise GP Holdings and TEPPCO Partners Reorganize Boards of Directors of General Partners February 14, 2006 HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Feb. 14, 2006--The general partners of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. "Enterprise" (NYSE:EPD), Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. "Enterprise GP" (NYSE:EPE) and TEPPCO Partners, L.P. "TEPPCO" (NYSE:TPP) have announced the reorganization of their respective boards of directors effective immediately. Enterprise Products Partners: Enterprise Products GP, LLC, the general partner of Enterprise, has announced the election of Stephen L. Baum, Richard H. Bachmann, Michael A. Creel, Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham and W. Randall Fowler as directors and the resignations of O. S. "Dub" Andras, W. Matt Ralls and Richard S. Snell from its board of directors. Enterprise GP Holdings: Upon their resignations from the board of Enterprise Products GP LLC, Mr. Andras and Mr. Ralls were elected as directors to the board of EPE Holdings, LLC, the general partner of Enterprise GP. In addition to Mr. Andras and Mr. Ralls, Mr. Bachmann, Mr. Fowler and Robert G. Phillips were also elected to the board of directors of the general partner of Enterprise GP. TEPPCO Partners: Mr. Snell was elected to the board of Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, the general partner of TEPPCO, effective January 6, 2006. Effective February 13, 2006, Mr. Snell resigned from the board of Enterprise Products GP LLC. In addition to Mr. Snell's prior election, Mr. Bachmann, Mr. Creel and Mr. Fowler were also elected to the board of directors of TEPPCO. "I am pleased to add Steve Baum to the Enterprise board.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazardous Material Profile
    prepared for North Carolina Statewide North Carolina Department of Transportation Multimodal Freight Plan prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Pipeline and Hazardous Material with Profile IEM February 1, 2017 report North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Pipeline and Hazardous Material Profile prepared for North Carolina Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 730 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 500 Atlanta, GA 30318 with IEM date February 1, 2017 North Carolina Statewide Multimodal Freight Plan Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Overview, Data and Methodology .............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Organization of the Report ......................................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 Fuels .................................................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.1 Fuel Model ................................................................................................................................. 2-7 2.2 Fuel Volumes by Mode in 2015 and Projections to 2045 .......................................................... 2-8 2.3 Pipelines .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): April 16, 2009 ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-32610 13-4297064 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.) 1100 Louisiana, 10th Floor Houston, Texas 77002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code) (713) 381-6500 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: ¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure. On April 21, 2009, Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE:EPD) and TEPPCO Partners, L.P. (NYSE:TPP) issued press releases regarding their dissociation, or exit from, the Texas Offshore Port System partnership. Copies of the press releases are furnished herewith as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2. In addition, Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. (the “Parent Company”) issued a press release regarding this matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise/Enbridge Proceeding Reaffirms Existing Market-Based Rate Methodology but Modifies Requirement to Show Good Alternatives in Terms of Cost
    H. Enterprise/Enbridge Proceeding Reaffirms Existing Market-Based Rate Methodology but Modifies Requirement To Show Good Alternatives in Terms of Cost Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. and Enbridge Inc. (Enterprise/Enbridge) announced their intention to reverse the flow on their existing crude oil pipeline, the Seaway pipeline, to provide transportation from Oklahoma to the Gulf Coast.568 Enterprise/Enbridge requested market-based rates as the initial rate on the reversed pipeline.569 The product market was defined in the application as the “transportation of crude oil.”570 Enterprise/Enbridge provided that the origin market and alternative competitors existed in Oklahoma, Kansas, Northwest Texas, as well as the production areas in Western Canada and the Permian Basin that would use the pipeline.571 Enterprise/Enbridge defined the destination market as either the entire Gulf Coast refining area or the more narrowly tailored Houston to Lake Charles area.572 Within weeks of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision in Mobil, in May 2012, the Commission denied the market-based rate application of Enterprise/Enbridge based on the inability to calculate the required netback cost to determine good alternatives. The inability was caused by the absence of a competitive price to benchmark the threshold price increase component of the netback analysis. The Commission thereafter, however, granted rehearing and reopened the record sua sponte to more fully consider the implications of the Mobil decision. On rehearing, the Commission reaffirmed its basic methodology for analyzing whether a pipeline should be permitted to charge market-based rates, i.e., the product and geographic markets are defined and then certain factors reflective of the pipeline’s market power in those defined markets are assessed.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Refiners Don't Care If Keystone Gets Built Railroads and Rival Pipeline Firms Are Making the Keystone Pipeline Less Necessary
    U.S. Refiners Don't Care if Keystone Gets Built Railroads and Rival Pipeline Firms Are Making the Keystone Pipeline Less Necessary. By Ben Lefebvre Sept. 4, 2013 U.S. companies that refine oil increasingly doubt that the controversial Keystone XL pipeline expansion will ever be built, and now they don't particularly care. Railroads are carrying soaring amounts of crude from Canada down to refineries along the U.S. Gulf Coast, reducing the need for the TransCanada Corp.TRP.T +0.46% project, which is still awaiting approval from the U.S. government after two years of delays. Meanwhile, a rival pipeline company, Enbridge Inc., ENB.T -0.09% is expanding existing pipes to carry Canadian crude south—and it doesn't need federal permission because it's using existing pipeline rights of way. In addition, so much oil is sloshing around the U.S. from its own wells that refiners don't need lots more heavy crude from the north to keep busy. "Keystone XL has been back-burnered for so long that any relevant parties have been able to make plans as though the project never even existed in the first place," says Sam Margolin, an analyst at Cowen & Co. TransCanada designed the proposed conduit to ship 830,000 barrels a day of heavy crude from western Canada, as well as lighter-grade oil from North Dakota shale fields, to the U.S. refining complex along the Gulf of Mexico. The cross-border Keystone project, billed as a way to reduce heavy oil imports from Venezuela and Mexico, requires a permit from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise and Enbridge Announce Completion of Seaway Pipeline Reversal
    ENTERPRISE AND ENBRIDGE ANNOUNCE COMPLETION OF SEAWAY PIPELINE REVERSAL Houston, Texas and Calgary, Alberta (May 17, 2012) – Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE: EPD) and Enbridge Inc. (NYSE/TSX:ENB) today announced that modifications to the Seaway crude oil pipeline allowing it to transport crude oil from Cushing, Oklahoma to the U.S. Gulf Coast have been completed. The pipeline is in the process of being commissioned, and the first flows of crude oil into the line are expected to begin this weekend. The reversal of the 500-mile, 30-inch diameter pipeline, which had been in northbound service since 1995, provides North American producers with the infrastructure needed to access more than 4 million barrels per day (“BPD”) of Gulf Coast refinery demand. The reversal will initially provide 150,000 BPD of capacity, which is expected to increase to more than 400,000 BPD in the first quarter of 2013 with additional modifications and increased pumping capabilities. Seaway Crude Pipeline Company LLC is a 50/50 joint venture owned by affiliates of Enterprise Products Partners and Enbridge Inc. In addition to the pipeline that transports crude oil from Cushing to the Gulf Coast, the Seaway system is comprised of a terminal and distribution network originating in Texas City, Texas, which serves refineries locally and in the Houston area. The Seaway system also includes dock facilities at Freeport and Texas City. For additional information, please visit www.seawaypipeline.com. Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is one of the largest publicly traded partnerships and a leading North American provider of midstream energy services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil, refined products and petrochemicals.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Products Partners Signs Long-Term Agreements to Provide Midstream Services in the Eagle Ford Shale
    Enterprise Products Partners Signs Long-Term Agreements to Provide Midstream Services in the Eagle Ford Shale October 25, 2010 HOUSTON, Oct 25, 2010 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Enterprise Products Partners L.P. (NYSE:EPD) today announced certain of its subsidiaries have entered into 10-year agreements with each of Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (NYSE:PXD), Reliance Eagleford Upstream Holding LP and Newpek, LLC (collectively, the "Pioneer JV") under which Enterprise will provide a full scope of midstream energy services to handle liquid-rich natural gas and crude oil production from the Pioneer JV's acreage in the Eagle Ford Shale play in South Texas. The agreements cover a significant portion of the Pioneer JV's expected Eagle Ford Shale production, including commitments for firm natural gas transportation, natural gas processing, natural gas liquid (NGL) fractionation and transportation services and crude oil marketing. "We look forward to putting our experience and assets to work for Pioneer and its partners, who we believe hold one of the most attractive NGL-rich natural gas and crude oil acreage positions in the Eagle Ford Shale," said Michael A. Creel, Enterprise President and Chief Executive Officer. "The flexibility of our existing integrated network, combined with new options that will be available with our assets currently under construction, has positioned Enterprise to provide a tailored solution for meeting the crude oil, natural gas and NGL infrastructure needs of producers in the Eagle Ford Shale." The Pioneer JV's NGL-rich natural gas will initially be processed using Enterprise's existing U.S. Gulf Coast facilities until it can be processed at Enterprise's previously announced natural gas processing plant that is under development in South Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Dixie HL GA 20100705.Pdf
    DOT US Department of Transportation PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration OPS Office of Pipeline Safety Southern Region Principal Investigators Joe Mataich and Chris Taylor Region Director Wayne T. Lemoi Date of Report August 31, 2011 Subject Failure Investigation Report – Dixie Pipeline Company 8‐inch Propane Pipeline Release Operator, Location, & Consequences Date of Failure July 5, 2010 Commodity Released Propane (HVL) City/County & State Thomson, McDuffie County, Georgia OpID & Operator Name 3445 & Dixie Pipeline Company Unit # & Unit Name 11082 & SC, NC, GA SMART Activity # 130575 Milepost / Location Milepost 817.11 ‐ off of Stagecoach Road (33.53667N, 82.53486W) Type of Failure Leak due to third party excavation damage Fatalities One (1) Injuries One (1) Description of area The propane leak, explosion and fire impacted portions of an impacted approximately 20 acre private property that included a pond, two mobile homes, a storage building, one passenger vehicle (Jeep) and one bulldozer, all surrounded by a wooded area. Property Damage Operator cost only, $524,275 Failure Investigation Report – Dixie Pipeline Company 8‐inch Propane Pipeline Release 07/05/2010 Executive Summary On Monday, July 5, 2010, at approximately 10:40 am Eastern Daylight Savings Time (EDT), a rupture occurred on the Dixie Pipeline Company (Dixie) 8‐inch diameter propane pipeline at milepost (MP) 817.11 in Thomson, McDuffie County, Georgia. The release occurred at 390 Stagecoach Road (Appendix A), which was a 20‐acre property with a pond, two mobile homes, and a storage building all surrounded by a wooded area. One passenger car (a Jeep) was on the premises at the time of the rupture.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 10-K Enterprise Products Partners L.P
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___ to ___. Commission file number: 1-14323 ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) DELAWARE 76-0568219 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 1100 LOUISIANA STREET, 10th FLOOR, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (713) 381-6500 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered Common Units New York Stock Exchange Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Form 10-K Enterprise Products Partners L.P
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___ to ___. Commission file number: 1-14323 ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 76-0568219 (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 1100 Louisiana Street, 10th Floor, Houston, Texas 77002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code) (713) 381-6500 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: Title of Each Class Trading Symbol(s) Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered Common Units EPD New York Stock Exchange Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ___ to ___. Commission file number: 1-14323 ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) DELAWARE 76-0568219 (State or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Incorporation or Organization) 1100 LOUISIANA STREET, 10th FLOOR, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) (713) 381-6500 (Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered Common Units New York Stock Exchange Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]