General Surgery 101: Nissen Fundoplication
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Subperitoneal Space and Peritoneal Cavity: Basic Concepts Harpreet K
ª The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with Abdom Imaging (2015) 40:2710–2722 Abdominal open access at Springerlink.com DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0429-5 Published online: 26 May 2015 Imaging The subperitoneal space and peritoneal cavity: basic concepts Harpreet K. Pannu,1 Michael Oliphant2 1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA 2Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA Abstract The peritoneum is analogous to the pleura which has a visceral layer covering lung and a parietal layer lining the The subperitoneal space and peritoneal cavity are two thoracic cavity. Similar to the pleural cavity, the peri- mutually exclusive spaces that are separated by the toneal cavity is visualized on imaging if it is abnormally peritoneum. Each is a single continuous space with in- distended by fluid, gas, or masses. terconnected regions. Disease can spread either within the subperitoneal space or within the peritoneal cavity to Location of the abdominal and pelvic organs distant sites in the abdomen and pelvis via these inter- connecting pathways. Disease can also cross the peri- There are two spaces in the abdomen and pelvis, the toneum to spread from the subperitoneal space to the peritoneal cavity (a potential space) and the subperi- peritoneal cavity or vice versa. toneal space, and these are separated by the peritoneum (Fig. 1). Regardless of the complexity of development in Key words: Subperitoneal space—Peritoneal the embryo, the subperitoneal space and the peritoneal cavity—Anatomy cavity remain separated from each other, and each re- mains a single continuous space (Figs. -
Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Description
OhioHealth Mansfield Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication is a surgical procedure intended to cure Esophagus gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Reflux disease is a disorder of the lower esophageal sphincter (the circular muscle at the base of the esophagus that serves as a barrier between the esophagus and stomach). When the LES malfunctions, acidic stomach contents are able to inappropriately reflux into the esophagus causing undesirable symptoms. The laparoscopic Nissen Esophageal Fundoplication involves wrapping a small portion of the stomach around the sphincter junction between the esophagus and stomach to augment the function of the Tightened LES. The operation effectively cures GERD with recurrence rates ranging from hiatus 5-10 percent over the life of the patient. Patients who experience a recurrence can be treated medically or undergo a redo laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication. The most common postoperative side effect of a laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication is gas bloating. A small percentage of patients (10-20 percent) will not be able to belch or vomit after surgery. Some patients may experience temporary difficult swallowing after surgery. Some patients may experience intermittent episodes of “dumping syndrome” due to Vagus nerve irritation or Top of stomach being excessive acid production in the stomach. wrapped around esophagus Patients are typically on a modified diet for a few weeks after surgery to allow time for healing of the surgical repair and recovery of the function of the esophagus and stomach. Top of stomach fully wrapped around esophagus and sutured Nissen fundoplication © OhioHealth Inc. 2018. All rights reserved. Laparoscopic. 05/18.. -
Nissen Fundoplication & Hiatal Hernia Repairs
Post-Operative Instructions Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication (or Hiatal Hernia Repair) Description of the Operation We will be doing a laparoscopic Nissen (or Toupet) fundoplication for you. Any hiatal hernia will also be repaired at the time of surgery. A fundoplication involves wrapping a portion of your stomach around your esophagus. This creates a valve-like mechanism to stop reflux of stomach juices into your esophagus (and to prevent a hiatal hernia from recurring). We’ll close your skin with tiny pieces of tape or transparent glue. Be prepared to spend one night in the hospital, although you might not need to, depending on how you feel after surgery. Your Recovery Vigorous straining (or prolonged vomiting) too soon after surgery can damage your diaphragm muscle before the stitches in it have had a chance to heal. This can cause your stomach to move out of position (a hiatal hernia) and the operation to fail or even require re-operation. Almost everybody experiences constant, dull chest, neck or shoulder discomfort when waking up from surgery. It usually fades within a day or two, sometimes longer. Because your operation will be performed laparoscopically, your discomfort will probably resolve before your diaphragm has finished healing. You should avoid heavy-lifting and any activity that causes you to strain and “get red in the face” for at least a month to let the diaphragm heal. You should be able to return to work or usual activities (except for the heavy-lifting) within a few days to a few weeks, depending on the activities. You may resume showering the day after surgery. -
Gastroparesis and Dumping Syndrome: Current Concepts and Management
Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Gastroparesis and Dumping Syndrome: Current Concepts and Management Stephan R. Vavricka 1,2,* and Thomas Greuter 2 1 Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CH-8048 Zurich, Switzerland 2 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 21 June 2019; Accepted: 23 July 2019; Published: 29 July 2019 Abstract: Gastroparesis and dumping syndrome both evolve from a disturbed gastric emptying mechanism. Although gastroparesis results from delayed gastric emptying and dumping syndrome from accelerated emptying of the stomach, the two entities share several similarities among which are an underestimated prevalence, considerable impairment of quality of life, the need for a multidisciplinary team setting, and a step-up treatment approach. In the following review, we will present an overview of the most important clinical aspects of gastroparesis and dumping syndrome including epidemiology, pathophysiology, presentation, and diagnostics. Finally, we highlight promising therapeutic options that might be available in the future. Keywords: gastroparesis; dumping syndrome; pathophysiology; clinical presentation; treatment 1. Introduction Gastroparesis and dumping syndrome both evolve from a disturbed gastric emptying mechanism. While gastroparesis results from significantly delayed gastric emptying, dumping syndrome is a consequence of increased flux of food into the small bowel [1,2]. The two entities share several important similarities: (i) gastroparesis and dumping syndrome are frequent, but also frequently overlooked; (ii) they affect patient’s quality of life considerably due to possibly debilitating symptoms; (iii) patients should be taken care of within a multidisciplinary team setting; and (iv) treatment should follow a step-up approach from dietary modifications and patient education to pharmacological interventions and, finally, surgical procedures and/or enteral feeding. -
Clinical Considerations of Intestinal Entrapment Through the Gastrosplenic Ligament in the Horse K
EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION / AE / JANUARY 2013 21 Clinical Commentary Clinical considerations of intestinal entrapment through the gastrosplenic ligament in the horse K. F. Ortved Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, New York, USA. Corresponding author email: [email protected] The gastrosplenic ligament (GSL) is rarely involved in intestinal common and although small intestinal incarceration is the accidents and consequently is infrequently mentioned in the most common form of GSL entrapment, net reflux on equine veterinary literature. The vast majority of reports of the presentation is not common. Jenei et al. (2007) suggested GSL involve small intestinal incarceration through a rent that this may be due to the distal small intestine becoming (Yovich et al. 1985; Mariën and Steenhaut 1998; Jenei entrapped most frequently, recent gastric decompression, et al. 2007; Hunt et al. 2013) with few reports describing dehydration and/or a short duration of entrapment prior to incarceration of other gastrointestinal structures including the presentation. Small intestinal distension may be palpated on small colon (Rhoads and Parks 1999) and large colon (Trostle rectal examination but this does not appear to be a consistent and Markel 1993; Torre 2000). Although there is documentation finding. Transabdominal ultrasonography is a useful diagnostic of strangulation of the jejunum alone, jejunum and ileum, or tool for confirming small intestinal dilation (Beccati et al. 2011) ileum alone through rents in the GSL, Jenei et al. (2007) in equine colic. Small intestinal dilation noted in the left reported that GSL entrapment accounted for only 1.5% of all cranioventral abdomen lateral to the spleen may be positively horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy and only 4.6% of correlated with GSL entrapment as suggested by Hunt et al. -
Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastro-Esophageal Acid Reflux
Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 28 (2014) 97–109 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology 8 Laparoscopic surgery for gastro-esophageal acid reflux disease Marlies P. Schijven, MD, PhD, MHSc, Assistant Professor of Surgery *, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of Surgery Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Centre, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands abstract Keywords: Systematic review Gastro-esophageal reflux disease is a troublesome disease for Reflux many patients, severely affecting their quality of life. Choice of Toupet treatment depends on a combination of patient characteristics and Nissen fl GERD preferences, esophageal motility and damage of re ux, symptom GORD severity and symptom correlation to acid reflux and physician Gastro-esophageal reflux disease preferences. Success of treatment depends on tailoring treatment Endoluminal modalities to the individual patient and adequate selection of Fundoplication treatment choice. PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Database of Laparoscopy Systematic Reviews, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Proton pump inhibitors Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) were searched for systematic Anti-reflux procedures reviews with an abstract, publication date within the last five years, in humans only, on key terms (laparosc* OR laparoscopy*) AND (fundoplication OR reflux* OR GORD OR GERD OR nissen OR toupet) NOT (achal* OR pediat*). Last search was performed on July 23nd and in total 54 articles were evaluated as relevant from this search. The laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication is the therapy of choice for normal-weight GERD patients qualifying for laparo- scopic surgery. No better pharmaceutical, endoluminal or surgical alternatives are present to date. -
Greater Omentum Connects the Greater Curvature of the Stomach to the Transverse Colon
Dr. ALSHIKH YOUSSEF Haiyan General features The peritoneum is a thin serous membrane Consisting of: 1- Parietal peritoneum -lines the ant. Abdominal wall and the pelvis 2- Visceral peritoneum - covers the viscera 3- Peritoneal cavity - the potential space between the parietal and visceral layer of peritoneum - in male, is a closed sac - but in the female, there is a communication with the exterior through the uterine tubes, the uterus, and the vagina ▪ Peritoneum cavity divided into Greater sac Lesser sac Communication between them by the epiploic foramen The peritoneum The peritoneal cavity is the largest one in the body. Divided into tow sac : .Greater sac; extends from diaphragm down to the pelvis. Lesser Sac .Lesser sac or omental bursa; lies behind the stomach. .Both cavities are interconnected through the epiploic foramen(winslow ). .In male : the peritoneum is a closed sac . .In female : the sac is not completely closed because it Greater Sac communicates with the exterior through the uterine tubes, uterus and vagina. Peritoneum in transverse section The relationship between viscera and peritoneum Intraperitoneal viscera viscera is almost totally covered with visceral peritoneum example, stomach, 1st & last inch of duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, vermiform appendix, transverse and sigmoid colons, spleen and ovary Intraperitoneal viscera Interperitoneal viscera Retroperitoneal viscera Interperitoneal viscera Such organs are not completely wrapped by peritoneum one surface attached to the abdominal walls or other organs. Example liver, gallbladder, urinary bladder and uterus Upper part of the rectum, Ascending and Descending colon Retroperitoneal viscera some organs lie on the posterior abdominal wall Behind the peritoneum they are partially covered by peritoneum on their anterior surfaces only Example kidney, suprarenal gland, pancreas, upper 3rd of rectum duodenum, and ureter, aorta and I.V.C The Peritoneal Reflection The peritoneal reflection include: omentum, mesenteries, ligaments, folds, recesses, pouches and fossae. -
Unit #2 - Abdomen, Pelvis and Perineum
UNIT #2 - ABDOMEN, PELVIS AND PERINEUM 1 UNIT #2 - ABDOMEN, PELVIS AND PERINEUM Reading Gray’s Anatomy for Students (GAFS), Chapters 4-5 Gray’s Dissection Guide for Human Anatomy (GDGHA), Labs 10-17 Unit #2- Abdomen, Pelvis, and Perineum G08- Overview of the Abdomen and Anterior Abdominal Wall (Dr. Albertine) G09A- Peritoneum, GI System Overview and Foregut (Dr. Albertine) G09B- Arteries, Veins, and Lymphatics of the GI System (Dr. Albertine) G10A- Midgut and Hindgut (Dr. Albertine) G10B- Innervation of the GI Tract and Osteology of the Pelvis (Dr. Albertine) G11- Posterior Abdominal Wall (Dr. Albertine) G12- Gluteal Region, Perineum Related to the Ischioanal Fossa (Dr. Albertine) G13- Urogenital Triangle (Dr. Albertine) G14A- Female Reproductive System (Dr. Albertine) G14B- Male Reproductive System (Dr. Albertine) 2 G08: Overview of the Abdomen and Anterior Abdominal Wall (Dr. Albertine) At the end of this lecture, students should be able to master the following: 1) Overview a) Identify the functions of the anterior abdominal wall b) Describe the boundaries of the anterior abdominal wall 2) Surface Anatomy a) Locate and describe the following surface landmarks: xiphoid process, costal margin, 9th costal cartilage, iliac crest, pubic tubercle, umbilicus 3 3) Planes and Divisions a) Identify and describe the following planes of the abdomen: transpyloric, transumbilical, subcostal, transtu- bercular, and midclavicular b) Describe the 9 zones created by the subcostal, transtubercular, and midclavicular planes c) Describe the 4 quadrants created -
Maestro Rechargeable System
® Maestro Rechargeable System Instructions for Use CAUTION: Federal Law restricts this device to sale by or on the order of a physician. Copyright 2015 by EnteroMedics Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota All rights reserved EnteroMedics, VBLOC and Maestro are registered trademarks of EnteroMedics Inc. The Maestro System is protected under U.S., European, Japanese and Australian Patents, and patent applications. Subject to Pat. Nos.: AU2004209978; AU2009245845; AU2006280277; AU2006280278; AU2008226689; AU2008259917; AU2011265519; US 7,167,750; US 7,672,727; US 7,822,486; US 7,917,226; US 8,010,204; US 8,068,918; US 8,103,349; US 8,140,167; US 8,483,830; US 8,483,838; US 8,521,299; US 8,532,787; US 8,538,542; US 8,825,164; JP 5486588; EP 1601414; EP 1603634; EP 1922109; and EP1922111 For use in a method covered by Pat. Nos.: AU2009231601; US 7,489,969; US 7,729,771; US 7,613,515; US 7,844,338; US 8,046,085; US 8,538,533 Maestro® Rechargeable System P01392-001 Rev J System Instructions for Use Table of Contents 1. INDICATIONS FOR USE .................................................................................................................... 4 2. CONTRAINDICATIONS ..................................................................................................................... 5 3. WARNINGS ..................................................................................................................................... 6 4. PRECAUTIONS ................................................................................................................................ -
Laparoscopic Antireflux Surgery After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual da Universidade de São Paulo (BDPI/USP) Universidade de São Paulo Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual - BDPI Sem comunidade Scielo 2012 Modified Nissen fundoplication: laparoscopic antireflux surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity Clinics,v.67,n.5,p.531-533,2012 http://www.producao.usp.br/handle/BDPI/40389 Downloaded from: Biblioteca Digital da Produção Intelectual - BDPI, Universidade de São Paulo CLINICS 2012;67(5):531-533 DOI:10.6061/clinics/2012(05)23 CASE REPORT Modified Nissen fundoplication: laparoscopic anti- reflux surgery after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity Nilton T Kawahara,I Clarissa Alster,I Fauze Maluf-Filho,II Wilson Polara,III Guilherme M. Campos,IV Luiz Francisco Poli-de-Figueiredo (in memoriam)I I Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sa˜ o Paulo, (FMUSP), Department of Surgical Technique, Sa˜ o Paulo/SP, Brazil. II Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sa˜ o Paulo, (FMUSP), Department of Gastroenterology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Sa˜ o Paulo/SP, Brazil. III Sı´rio Libaneˆ s Hospital, Department of Oncology Surgery, Sao Paulo/SP, Brazil. IV University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Wisconsin/USA. Email: [email protected] Tel.: 55 11 5585 9119 CASE DESCRIPTION (normal ,14.72, 95th percentile). Manometry showed a lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LES) of 9 mmHg (normal A 46-year-old white woman presented to the clinic in range from 14.3 to 34.5 mmHg), and the contraction amplitude September 2009 with intermittent abdominal epigastric pain of the proximal and middle region was greater than 30 mmHg accompanied by nausea, heartburn and frequent crises of (50.6 mmHg). -
Gastroesophageal Reflux: Anatomy and Physiology
26th Annual Scientific Conference | May 1-4, 2017 | Hollywood, FL Gastroesophageal Reflux: Anatomy and Physiology Amy Lowery Carroll, MSN, RN, CPNP- AC, CPEN Children’s of Mississippi at The University of Mississippi Medical Center Jackson, Mississippi Disclosure Information I have no disclosures. Objectives • Review embryologic development of GI system • Review normal anatomy and physiology of esophagus and stomach • Review pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux 1 26th Annual Scientific Conference | May 1-4, 2017 | Hollywood, FL Embryology of the Gastrointestinal System GI and Respiratory systems are derived from the endoderm after cephalocaudal and lateral folding of the yolk sack of the embryo Primitive gut can be divided into 3 sections: Foregut Extends from oropharynx to the liver outgrowth Thyroid, esophagus, respiratory epithelium, stomach liver, biliary tree, pancreas, and proximal portion of duodenum Midgut Liver outgrowth to the transverse colon Develops into the small intestine and proximal colon Hindgut Extends from transverse colon to the cloacal membrane and forms the remainder of the colon and rectum Forms the urogenital tract Embryology of the Gastrointestinal System Respiratory epithelium appears as a bud of the esophagus around 4th week of gestation Tracheoesophageal septum develops to separate the foregut into ventral tracheal epithelium and dorsal esophageal epithelium Esophagus starts out short and lengthens to final extent by 7 weeks Anatomy and Physiology of GI System Upper GI Tract Mouth Pharynx Esophagus Stomach -
Avulsion of Short Gastric Arteries Caused by Vomiting
Gut 1 994; 35: 1 137-1 138 1137 CASE REPORTS Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.35.8.1137 on 1 August 1994. Downloaded from Avulsion of short gastric arteries caused by vomiting N Hayes, P D Waterworth, S M Griffin Abstract Case report A case is presented describing a new, A 21 year old man was referred as an emerg- potentially life threatening complication ency by his general practitioner with acute of vomiting after a 21 year old man pre- abdominal pain. The preceding evening he had sented in shock with a haemoperitoneum consumed eight pints of lager followed by a caused by violent, selfinduced emesis. take away Chinese meal. At 7 am on the day of (Gut 1994;35: 1137-1138) admission, he awoke feeling uncomfortable and bloated, so he forced himself to vomit by putting his fingers down his throat. The result- Forceful or prolonged retching, from whatever ing retching was surprisingly violent, and cause, can lead to life threatening oesophago- epigastric pain developed shortly afterwards. gastric complications. The commonest, a When he later visited his doctor, the pain had Department of Mallory-Weiss tear,' often presenting as an radiated to both shoulders and he was referred Surgery, Newcastle General Hospital, upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, arises to casualty. On admission, the patient Newcastle upon Tyne from a breach of the mucosa around the recounted the above history and was clear that N Hayes oesophagogastric junction. Occasionally there he had suffered no recent external trauma. P D Waterworth S M Griffin is a full thickness perforation, usually of the left Examination showed the patient to be afebrile, wall of the oesophagus several centimetres but pale and distressed with a pulse rate of 1 12 Correspondence to: Mr N Hayes, Newcastle above the cardia, which was first described by bpm and blood pressure 75/35 mm Hg.