DOCSLIB.ORG

American Studies of the Distribution of Wealth and Income by Size

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Studies of the Distribution of Wealth and Income by Size This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Studies in Income and Wealth, Volume 3 Volume Author/Editor: Conference on Research in National Income and Wealth Volume Publisher: NBER Volume ISBN: 0-870-14158-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/unkn39-1 Publication Date: 1939 Chapter Title: American Studies of the Distribution of Wealth and Income by Size Chapter Author: C. L. Merwin, Jr. Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9521 Chapter pages in book: (p. 2 - 94) Part one AMERiCAN STUDIES OF THE DISTRiBUTioN OF WEALTH AND INCO?1E BY SIZE C. L. MERWIN, JR. Ifi KIt (I FOKI I(.\'.\I) I(E%II slit.( Ultt KI I I \I III) SI t1 IS II ItRI Sit '1 tII It\ISIIR( L Discussion SIMON KUZNETS NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECoNOMIC RENEARCII AMERICAN STUDIES OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH AND INCOME BY SIZE C. L. MERWIN, JR. THE genetic development of the analysisof wealth and income distribution by size in the United States is notwithout a cause. This one is tempted to seek in the strandsof economic history. The immediate impulse was a Censusstudy by 6. K. Holmes and J. S. Lord, entitled Farms and Homes:Proprietorship and indebtedness in the United States atthe Eleventh Census. This special study, provided for by an Act ofCongress dated February 22, 1892, was theculmination of discussions then raging inlegis- lative halls concerning theconcentration of wealth. The ultimate causes are farther toseek. The rise of industrial trusts provides one clue.Although evidences of industrial inte- gration in the United Statesappeared as carly as 1861 with tile cordage iiidustry agreements the movementdid not gaul mo- mentum until the last quarterof the century when theStandard Oil trust was formed. By theconclusion of the initiating trust- proper phase of the moementin the 1890'S, statisticianS ha(l already inaugurated analysis ofthe distribution of wealth, by size of wealth holding. Another clue is provided bythe trend of wholesale prices. Over the nineteenth centurythere was a secular decline inwhole- sale prices which the Civil Warinflation merely interrupted. From the currency restabilizationin 1871 to the close of the Ce!]- tury, prices fell more than athird. The year m 8q6represented the all-tinle low point. Persons enjoyingfixed incomes (e.g., recipi- e 4 i'ARlONF cuts of propertyincome) stood to probE itoinfalling prices; persons burdened withfixed charges(e.g., while gages) felt the pinch arniers with of the pricedecline. mort- The mere existenceof these positive correlationsdoeS ply a cause-and-effectrelationship between not im- the decline in the USC of prices on theone hand, and trUSts and tions of wealth analyses of and incomeon the other. Yet distribu- does suggest such a relationshipbetween economic ConComitance demic interests,and warrants history andaca- thepreSUiflpttOii that income distributionanalysis wealth and need, not was launchedto hi! a merely toprovide academic pressing sxial Although the jousts forstatisticians. trust movementand price fully described trends havebeen and analyzedby scores care- been writtenon the statistical of investigators,little has raised by this attempt to analvie economic andsocial the prol)knls paper is to delineate, transition. The in Sections object ofthis of wealth 1 and 11.the historical and incomedistribution strands concluded by analysis. Fhese recapitulationsin outline SectionS are phasize thesalient form, whichset ye to em- characteristics ofthese earlier eluding section studics. ina con- speculation isvei it wed reasons whydistributions of concerning possible wealth andof income structed havebeen relatively thus farcon- inadequate. a) Fin. I American Studie.cof (lie 1)j51r111uf ionof At leak I HISTORICAL Wealth AND the rim METHODOLOGICAl. The stubof a tabular RFXI EW the Un a series of distributionof wealth, wealth classes by size,would sho The and over'. ranging from,say, 'o--$roo' ifl9 liii \ Thefrequencies to $ I .000,000 uals, families, would give Iereiii or someother the numberof individ- for example, wealth-holding 1. 1 the iuimbcrof unit in eachclass: O-5OO' and peisons possessing ilics cot at 'Si,000,000 wealth valuedat 'l'he two and over'. into six substantive sizearc the elcfllc;Its inthe distril,ution OW 1111 nature and of wealth hr tributed, dollaramount of hiring L and thenature and the wealththat is dis- units, Thefirst is number ofthe ties own estimation comrnofll?referre(j wealth-holding of whichis a to as national ategorn I Sec Siiuo problem all wealth, the Kuinei its own)The ing farni S1udj,-,t'ohu,(' 7,,,, SCcOfl(lhinges I i',u One. ho;iteP° 2I he (,tn WEAL1H A'JD iNCO51I1)1SRLIIUTION on a decision as to among whom (or what) the wealth is distrib- tited. We could, [or example, tabulate the distribution of wealth, by size, among individuals, families, estates, corporations, and other more or less homogeneous entities. In addition, the distri- bution could he by subdivisions of each of these units. In this paper the distribution of wealth is considered with respect to the individual, family, and estate units. No complete census of wealth holdings by any of these units has ever been taken in the United States. Therefore, attempts to construct a distribution of wealth must rely on samples of the universe, or on wealth's possible functional relationship with some other variable such as income, tax pavinents house owner- ship. When samples are used, there is the problem of extending the partial picture to give a complete description. Frequently the other aids mentioned above are employed in this task, but some- times the extetsion of the sample is a matter of slicer guesswork. To enhance its applicability and augment its coverage, the sam- ple may be treated beforehand, by means of supplementarydata and arbitrary assumptions. In any case the problems confronting the investigator are numerous an(l difficult, as the descriptionsof these stu(hes on the following pages illustrate. a) Holmes' atlemt At least two publicized attempts were made in thelast decade of the nineteenth century to estimate the distributionof wealth in the LJiiited States. The first, by G. K. Holmes inJ8,2 was a modest statistical inquiry, based on census data, into the nurnl)Crof families of (lii- ferent economic characteristicsn the lliiitedStates atid the wealth possessed by each class of family. Ofthe i 2,690,152 [am- flies enumerated in the i 890 Census, 11,5q',887 were classified into six categories which includedfarm-hiring families, families owning enuml)erc(l farms:,families owning free farms, home- hiring families, families owning encumberedhomes, and fami- lies owning free homes. Theallocation of families to these categories was accomplished by acomplicated profe(lure involv- ing farm and home proprietorship data, avtigcsof the farm and home possessions and indebtedness of thevarious types of fami- 'The Concentration of Wealth', PoliticalScience (uarterlv, VIII (i8g).589-600. lies, assumptions as to the number of fartu.s and offanli lies pying non-farm houses, and ot'( arbitrary allowancesfot 'other' sessions and debts of each class pos- of family. Togethertitese fallijhjes were estimated to possess17,'56,8$7,3f3 Sjll(e thenational wealth was set by Holmesat "about sixty bzllon5 91 per cent of the families, therefore, of dollars"s t)Wfle(J 29PCi cent of the wealth, and, by subtraction,9 per cent of the familic5 71 per cent of the wealth. owned Having estimatedthe wealth poorer class, Holmes directed of the attention to that ofthe very rich, According toa New York Tribune estimate of 18q2,lthere 4,047 nhjilionairesin tile United States. were their average wealth I-h)jlflcs aSSIIIUC(ithat was $,OoO,000; whichmeant that they held 20 per cent of the totalwealth. His final distrii)ution ofWealth, in Lorenz curve form,was: .o per (eAt of families (i.e.,time lllilhiOflaitcs) 9 per cent of families (excluding own 20 pci cent nhillionaim(s)OWn lpt' pci' CCitt families OWfl29 per cem (Cut From addedcomments of Holmes ('011CCrIIillg the wealth(us- tributioji among tilepoorer (lasses, it is pOS5iI)lto split Llj) titis (listribution of wealthin 1890 Into five classes, frontridi to poor: PIRCENTAGF Of FAMIi, ci stt'Li: I'ik(:fr%t.i III U5I I i) sixtpj .03 cu stit r I, .t)'3 8.97 20 9.45) 2(1 27.00 36.00 5 20 12.00 48.00 52.Ou i00u 4 5 lIMP I)) Spa/i r's(list rib tition T'he second Pre-twentieth centuryestimate of the distribution wealth, Statisticallymore pretentio0 of than the fjist. was published a Ibid... 590. ihe Ceu,1 estimate United States oF the totalvaltie of tangible was $6s,onoo. property ithe (Washington '898), e Cosnpr,jjj,,,,p u/the Part Ill,p. Ele,,g/1 Cenms::8a this estimate, Holmes 6gureseems designed to and perhaps thefact that it approximate hy it fell fivehuh00 dollars was made fiveyears earlier rxplaim This, and shoit, a sjmjhir X,I'm-k IFOTI(j list Watkjn5' 'TheGrowth of Large of mihli),Iairesire descrjl4 in C. P. A5$ocjaljo,,d ser, VIfl Fortu,se.c' Publications 5 p41-7. 0/the American Economic- Holmes op. cit.,fI. 59g. WEALTH AND INCOMF DISTR1lUFj()' 7 by C. B. Spahr in 1896.e He basedhis analysis on figures forpro- bated estates obtained fromthe Surrogate records of New York State. Data were collected for'36 CoUnties, including thearea comprised by New York City andBrooklyn, and having a popula- tion of 4,625,00c)persons, for October, November, and 1)eceniber of 1892. Because theywere not (teemed representative, the fig- ures for New York City and Brooklynwere excluded, leaving the accompanying distribution of probatedestates, which was used as the basis for the subsequent distributionof wealth iii the tlinted States. Once these basic datawere acquired, generalized PERCENI - Il-ELI A(.E OF 1 01 Al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lorenz Curve
    Charting Income Inequality The Lorenz Curve Resources for policy making Module 000 Charting Income Inequality The Lorenz Curve Resources for policy making Charting Income Inequality The Lorenz Curve by Lorenzo Giovanni Bellù, Agricultural Policy Support Service, Policy Assistance Division, FAO, Rome, Italy Paolo Liberati, University of Urbino, "Carlo Bo", Institute of Economics, Urbino, Italy for the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO About EASYPol The EASYPol home page is available at: www.fao.org/easypol EASYPol is a multilingual repository of freely downloadable resources for policy making in agriculture, rural development and food security. The resources are the results of research and field work by policy experts at FAO. The site is maintained by FAO’s Policy Assistance Support Service, Policy and Programme Development Support Division, FAO. This modules is part of the resource package Analysis and monitoring of socio-economic impacts of policies. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO November 2005: All rights reserved. Reproduction and dissemination of material contained on FAO's Web site for educational or other non-commercial purposes are authorized without any prior written permission from the copyright holders provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of material for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without the written permission of the copyright holders.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality Measurement Development Issues No
    Development Strategy and Policy Analysis Unit w Development Policy and Analysis Division Department of Economic and Social Affairs Inequality Measurement Development Issues No. 2 21 October 2015 Comprehending the impact of policy changes on the distribu- tion of income first requires a good portrayal of that distribution. Summary There are various ways to accomplish this, including graphical and mathematical approaches that range from simplistic to more There are many measures of inequality that, when intricate methods. All of these can be used to provide a complete combined, provide nuance and depth to our understanding picture of the concentration of income, to compare and rank of how income is distributed. Choosing which measure to different income distributions, and to examine the implications use requires understanding the strengths and weaknesses of alternative policy options. of each, and how they can complement each other to An inequality measure is often a function that ascribes a value provide a complete picture. to a specific distribution of income in a way that allows direct and objective comparisons across different distributions. To do this, inequality measures should have certain properties and behave in a certain way given certain events. For example, moving $1 from the ratio of the area between the two curves (Lorenz curve and a richer person to a poorer person should lead to a lower level of 45-degree line) to the area beneath the 45-degree line. In the inequality. No single measure can satisfy all properties though, so figure above, it is equal to A/(A+B). A higher Gini coefficient the choice of one measure over others involves trade-offs.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Regions
    How’s life in your region? Insights from income distribution and poverty in OECD regions July 2014 New OECD data show that differences in household income distribution and poverty are large not only among OECD countries but also across regions within a country. The availability of information on household income distribution and poverty at regional level, as well as on other aspects of quality of life, helps policy makers to focus their efforts and enhance the effectiveness of public interventions in a period of tight resources. The forthcoming OECD report How’s life in your region? documents the importance of regional inequalities in many well-being dimensions in OECD countries, provides evidence on the determinants of income inequalities within and between regions, and discusses the links between income inequality and economic growth at regional level. Regional data on the distribution of household income come with various warnings. Household surveys are rarely designed to be representative at the regional level; comparing regions in different countries is tricky, because their size varies; and these income numbers ignore the fact that the cost of living is usually lower in rural areas than in cities, which may have the effect of exaggerating inequality in a country. The new set of indicators of regional income inequality and poverty produced for 28 OECD countries extends the OECD Income Distribution Database (IDD) to NUTS2 regions in Europe and to large administrative regions (e.g. states in Mexico and Unites States) for non-European countries for the year 2010 and providing measures of the statistical reliability of these data.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Income Inequality While Boosting Economic Growth: Can It Be Done?
    Economic Policy Reforms 2012 Going for Growth © OECD 2012 PART II Chapter 5 Reducing income inequality while boosting economic growth: Can it be done? This chapter identifies inequality patterns across OECD countries and provides new analysis of their policy and non-policy drivers. One key finding is that education and anti-discrimination policies, well-designed labour market institutions and large and/or progressive tax and transfer systems can all reduce income inequality. On this basis, the chapter identifies several policy reforms that could yield a double dividend in terms of boosting GDP per capita and reducing income inequality, and also flags other policy areas where reforms would entail a trade-off between both objectives. 181 II.5. REDUCING INCOME INEQUALITY WHILE BOOSTING ECONOMIC GROWTH: CAN IT BE DONE? Summary and conclusions In many OECD countries, income inequality has increased in past decades. In some countries, top earners have captured a large share of the overall income gains, while for others income has risen only a little. There is growing consensus that assessments of economic performance should not focus solely on overall income growth, but also take into account income distribution. Some see poverty as the relevant concern while others are concerned with income inequality more generally. A key question is whether the type of growth-enhancing policy reforms advocated for each OECD country and the BRIICS in Going for Growth might have positive or negative side effects on income inequality. More broadly, in pursuing growth and redistribution strategies simultaneously, policy makers need to be aware of possible complementarities or trade-offs between the two objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia-Herzegovina Economy Briefing: Report: Keeping up with the Reform Agenda in 2019 Ivica Bakota
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 14, No. 2 (BH) January 2019 Bosnia-Herzegovina economy briefing: Report: Keeping up with the Reform Agenda in 2019 Ivica Bakota 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Report: Keeping up with the Reform Agenda in 2019 The second Bosnian four-year plan? In October 2018, German and British embassies organized a meeting with Bosnian economic and political experts, main party economic policy creators, EBRD and the WB representatives away from Bosnian political muddle in Slovenian Brdo kod Kranja to evaluate the success of the Reform Agenda and discuss the possibility of extending reform period or launching the second Reform Agenda. Defining an extension or a new reform agenda which in the next four years should tackle what was not covered in the first Agenda was prioritized on the meeting and is expected to become topical in the first months of the new administration. Regardless of the designed four- year timeframe, the government is expected to continue with enforcing necessary reforms envisioned in the (current) Reform Agenda and, according the official parlance, focuses on tackling those parts that haven’t been gotten straight. To make snap digression, the Reform Agenda was a broad set of social and economic reforms proposed (but poorly supervised) by German and other European ‘partners’ in order to help Bosnia and Herzegovina to exit from transitional limbo and make ‘real’ progress on the EU integrations track.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Results of Inequitable Distribution of Wealth, Opportunity Or Education
    Causes and Results of Inequitable Distribution of Wealth, Opportunity or Education By Claire Pettinger The unequal distribution of wealth is a major problem not only nationwide but worldwide. There are several reasons as to why this is an issue, but the two major ones go hand in hand: lack of resources and the unequal distribution of capitalism. A common misconception is that the main reason for this wealth gap is because the rich are rich, as if they stole the poor’s money. This is not the case. As a product of the inequitable distribution of wealth, opportunities to advance become scarce and the overall standard of living decreases. It is impossible to pin this gap on any one thing, for there are multiple causes that result in this division. However it is safe to say that the outcome of it can be catastrophic. There are several countries that prosper while having little resources. Their key to success is international trade. For example, Japan has very little usable farmland due to its rocky terrain and resources in general, and yet they are thriving. They are able to live in prosperity because of their open, capitalist economy. This prevents their government from interfering in their trade. Other countries such as the Central African Republic (CAR) are rich with resources, but do not have a capitalist economy, so its residents aren’t even allowed the opportunity to grow and thrive as a country. “The CAR’s economic freedom score is 46.7, making its economy the 161st freest in the 2014 Index” (Central).
    [Show full text]
  • The College Wealth Divide: Education and Inequality in America, 1956-2016
    The College Wealth Divide: Education and Inequality in America, 1956-2016 Alina K. Bartscher, Moritz Kuhn, and Moritz Schularick Using new long-run microdata, this article studies wealth and income trends of households with a college degree (college households) and without a college degree (noncollege households) in the United States since 1956. We document the emergence of a substantial college wealth premium since the 1980s, which is considerably larger than the college income premium. Over the past four decades, the wealth of college households has tripled. By contrast, the wealth of noncollege households has barely grown in real terms over the same period. Part of the rising wealth gap can be traced back to systematic portfolio differences between college and noncollege households that give rise to different exposures to asset price changes. Noncollege households have lower exposure to the equity market and have profited much less from the recent surge in the stock market. We also discuss the importance of financial literacy and business ownership for the increase in wealth inequality between college and noncollege households. (JEL I24, E21, D31) Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, First Quarter 2020, 102(1), pp. 19-49. https://doi.org/10.20955/r.102.19-49 1 INTRODUCTION It is a well-documented fact that the college wage premium has increased substantially since the 1980s (see, e.g., Levy and Murnane,1992; Katz and Autor, 1999; and Goldin and Katz 2007). This trend can be traced back to differences in the growth of the demand for and the supply of college-educated workers that are driven by skill-biased technical change, socio- demographic factors, and institutional features (Card and Lemieux, 2001, and Fortin, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
    Sub-Saharan Africa povertydata.worldbank.org Poverty & Equity Brief Sub-Saharan Africa Angola April 2020 Between 2008-2009 and 2018-2019, the percent of people below the national poverty line changed from 37 percent to 41 percent (data source: IDR 2018-2019). During the same period, Angola experienced an increase in GDP per capita followed by a recession after 2014 when the price of oil declined. Based on the new benchmark survey (IDREA 2018-2019) and the new national poverty line, the incidence of poverty in Angola is at 32 percent nationally, 18 percent in urban areas and a staggering 54 percent in the less densely populated rural areas. In Luanda, less than 10 percent of the population is below the poverty line, whereas the provinces of Cunene (54 percent), Moxico (52 percent) and Kwanza Sul (50 percent) have much higher prevalence of poverty. Despite significant progress toward macroeconomic stability and adopting much needed structural reforms, estimates suggest that the economy remained in recession in 2019 for the fourth consecutive year. Negative growth was driven by the continuous negative performance of the oil sector whose production declined by 5.2 percent. This has not been favorable to poverty reduction. Poverty is estimated to have increased to 48.4 percent in 2019 compared to 47.6 percent in 2018 when using the US$ 1.9 per person per day (2011 PPP). COVID-19 will negatively affect labor and non-labor income. Slowdown in economic activity due to social distancing measures will lead to loss of earnings in the formal and informal sector, in particular among informal workers that cannot work remotely or whose activities were limited by Government.
    [Show full text]
  • The Global Wealth Report 2021
    June 2021 Research Institute Global wealth report 2021 Thought leadership from Credit Suisse and the world’s foremost experts Introduction Now in its twelfth year, I am proud to present to you the 2021 edition of the Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report. This report delivers a comprehensive analysis on available global household wealth, underpinned by unique insights from leading academics in the field, Anthony Shorrocks and James Davies. This year’s edition digs deeper into the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the response of policymakers on global wealth and its distribution. Mindful of the important wealth differences that have built over the last year, our report also offers perspectives and, indeed, encouraging prospects, for wealth accumulation throughout the global wealth pyramid as we look to a world beyond the pandemic. I hope you find the insights of this edition of the Global Wealth Report to be of particular value in what remain unprecedented times. António Horta-Osório Chairman of the Board of Directors Credit Suisse Group AG 2 02 Editorial 05 Global wealth levels 2020 17 Global wealth distribution 2020 27 Wealth outlook for 2020–25 35 Country experiences 36 Canada and the United States 38 China and India 40 France and the United Kingdom 42 Germany, Austria and Switzerland 44 Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden 46 Japan, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan (Chinese Taipei) 48 Australia and New Zealand 50 Nigeria and South Africa 52 Brazil, Chile and Mexico 54 Greece, Italy and Spain 56 About the authors 57 General disclaimer / important
    [Show full text]
  • A Wealth Tax for South Africa
    World Inequality Lab – Working Paper N° 2021/02 A Wealth Tax for South Africa Aroop Chatterjee Léo Czajka Amory Gethin January 2021 A Wealth Tax for South Africa∗ Aroop Chatterjee Léo Czajka Amory Gethin January 2021 Abstract This paper considers the feasibility of implementing a progressive wealth tax to collect additional government revenue to both reinforce fiscal sustainability in the wake of the COVID-19 crisis and reduce persistent extreme inequality in South Africa. Drawing on our new companion paper, we first identify the tax base and discuss the design of potential tax schedules. Testing alternative tax schedules, we estimate how much additional revenue could be collected from a progressive tax on the top 1% richest South Africans. Our results show that under conservative assumptions, a wealth tax could raise between 70 and 160 billion Rands — 1.5% to 3.5% of the South African GDP. We discuss in turn how sensitive our estimates are to assumptions on (1) mismeasurement of wealth and (2) tax avoidance and evasion, based on the most recent tax policy literature. We examine technical issues related to the enforcement of the tax, and how third-party reporting and pre-filled declara- tions could be used to optimize measurement of taxable wealth and minimize evasion and avoidance opportunities. Finally, we explain how this new tax could interact with other capital related taxes already in place in South Africa, and discuss the potential impact on growth. ∗Aroop Chatterjee, Southern Centre for Inequality Studies – University of Witwatersrand ; Léo Czajka, Université Catholique de Louvain; Amory Gethin, World Inequality Lab – Paris School of Economics.
    [Show full text]
  • Globalization and Income Distribution: Evidence from Pakistan
    Globalization and Income Distribution: Evidence from Pakistan Shahzad Hussain, Dr. Imran Sharif Chaudhry and Mahmood-ul-Hasan* Abstract It is widely believed that income inequality can be reduced through opening up of the economies of developing countries into the world market. But changes in country’s trade exposure and world market can affect negatively the distribution of resources within the country. This paper empirically explores the impact of globalization on income distribution using econometric time series approach for the period 1972- 2005 in Pakistan. The results are in favor of the conventional wisdom that opening up of the economy into the international market has good effects on the distribution of income. Income inequality can be reduced through foreign capital penetration. Huge trade volume with negative trade balance must be controlled. Key Words: Globalization, Income Distribution, Trade Openness, Foreign Direct Investment, Remittances JEL Classification: D31, F10, F21, F24 I. Introduction Nations across the globe have established progressively closer contacts with the passage of time, but recently the pace has dramatically increased. These closer contacts of different forms are welcomed by the politicians, academics, journalists and economists throughout the world. But many also believe that business-driven globalization is uprooting the old ways of life and threatening the cultures and livelihoods of the poor people. Nevertheless globalization is a multi-dimensional phenomenon. Economic globalization can comprehensively defined as a process of rapid economic integration among countries driven by liberalization of trade, investment and capital flows as well as technological change (Torres, 2001).Globalization is also movement across international borders of goods and factors of production.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text (PDF)
    Journal of Business & Economic Policy Vol. 6, No. 1, March 2019 doi:10.30845/jbep.v6n1p3 Poverty Alleviation in Bosnia And Herzegovina: An Islamic Approach Dr. Amra Nuhanović Associate Professor Faculty of Economics University of Tuzla Dr. Amra Babajić Assistant Professor Faculty of Economics University of Tuzla Abstract Poverty alleviation is a problem that faces every country in the world, especially underdeveloped and developing countries. In particular, more than half population is under the risk of poverty and social exclusion in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H in further text). Furthermore, unemployed people, youth, women and old people are particularly jeopardized. There are a lot of reasons for this situation: high level of unemployment, low level of education, underdeveloped and inefficient health system, aggression on Bosnia and Herzegovina between 1992 and 1995, high level of corruption, slow reforms implementation (economic, legal and political), etc. Therefore this paper is going to give an overview of the state of poverty in B&H, even so it suggests the way it can be alleviated or reduced, leading to principles of Islamic economy and finance. Moreover, descriptive method of research will be used. Authors concluded that if Islamic approaches would be implemented holistically, it would be possible to alleviate poverty to a satisfactory level. The results of research can help government decision makers in formulating poverty alleviation strategies and politics. Keywords: poverty alleviation; Islamic Approach, Bosnia and Herzegovina. JEL Classification: I32, I38. 1. Introduction Researching poverty phenomenon is in the center of interest of traditional economic theorists today. As well, it is huge challenge for Islamic theorists because of the fact they believe that Islam is unique religion which can solve all human problems.
    [Show full text]