DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of Public Meeting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minutes of Public Meeting Agenda Item No: 5 Democratic Services PO Box 136 County Hall Northampton NN1 1AT Development Control Committee Minutes: 6 December 2010 Venue: Council Chamber, County Hall, Northampton (Meeting held in public) PRESENT:- Councillor Michael Clarke (Chairman) Councillor George Blackwell Councillor Dennis Meredith Councillor Don Edwards Councillor Ron Pinnock Councillor Graham Lawman Councillor Rupert Reichhold Also in attendance (for all or part of the meeting) Councillor Bob Seery Councillor Ben Smith Roy Boulton Chief Planner Debbie Carter Highways & Planning Manager, Legal Services Jenny Rendall Committee Assistant (minutes) Phil Watson Development Control Manger 9 members of the public also attended. 93/10 Apologies for non-attendance Apologies were received from Councillors David Hugheston-Roberts & Alan Wright. 94/10 Notification of Requests from Members of the Public to Address the Meeting Notifications were received detailed below: Item 6a – Erection of a 1.8metre high security fence including a boom barrier at Helmdon Primary School, Station Road, Helmdon, Brackley, NN13 5QT Ms Clare Hedley, Helmdon Primary School Item 7a - Extraction of sand and gravel mineral reserves to enable the construction of a 100 berth marina basin for recreational and leisure use at Lilford Lodge Farm, Lilford, Oundle, Peterborough, PE8 5SA. Stephen Rice, Fischer German Councillor Bob Seery 95/10 Declaration of Members’ Interests Item Councillor Type Nature 6c George Blackwell Personal Grendon is part of the Earls Barton Application: Division. 10/00073/CCD 7b George Blackwell Personal Member of Borough Council of Application: Wellingborough, Earls Barton 10/00066/EXT Parish Council and resident of Earls Barton. 7a Rupert Reichhold Personal Member of Nene Valley Association There was no declaration of whip. 96/10 Chairman’s Announcements On behalf of the Development Control Committee, best wishes were sent to Committee Assistant, Barbel Gale on the birth of her son. 97/10 Minutes of the Meeting held on 1 November 2010: The minutes of the meeting held in public on 1 November 2010 (copies of which were previously circulated) were agreed as a true and accurate record of the meeting. The minutes of the meeting held in public on 1 November 2010 (copies of which were previously circulated) were agreed as a true and accurate record of the meeting. County Council Planning Applications: 98/10 Erection of a 1.8 metre high security fence including boom barrier at Helmdon Primary School, Station Road, Helmdon, Brackley, NN13 5QT (10/00052/CCD & S/2010/0943/RG3): The Chairman invited the DCM to introduce the report (copies of which had been previously circulated) who highlighted the following: Many school sites now included security fences, many of which did not require planning permission because they were below 2 metres in height and did not face on to a public highway. The Parish Council had objected to the application and a photograph was included in the report of how the boom barrier might appear which would be 1.2metres high when closed and 6metres when open. Concerns raised by South Northamptonshire District Council (SNDC) had also led to a change in the design of the fence to a bow top design. SNDC and Helmdon Parish Council had also voiced concerns about the intrusion of the barrier on the street scene. Whilst SNDC were happy with the new design Helmdon Parish Council still felt the fence created a prison-like approach to the school. They also queried the need for the fence as the school had not experienced problems in the past and it was not a requirement of Ofsted. Many schools aspired to improve their security. The Committee were provided with a copy of an e-mail from the Clerk to Helmdon Parish Council in which their objections were outlined as well as the fact they would have appreciated an invitation to speak at the meeting. The Chairman noted that whilst it was helpful for speakers to register their intention to speak, it was not necessary. The DCM confirmed he had written to Helmdon Parish Council inviting them to the committee as was the normal practice to all those objecting to an application. This invitation had been repeated by e-mail that morning. The Chairman then invited Ms Claire Hedley to address the Committee who stated: As Bursar of Helmdon Primary School she represented staff, parents, pupils and residents of Helmdon Village. She had raised the issue of security over 5 years previously as a new parent and particularly as the school had a large playing field. Parents had regularly voiced concerns about security as well as staff who were concerned about children being taken from the school field. The school was sited on the main road in the village and experienced a large number of buses and traffic including large lorries coming to and from a nearby saw mill. Concerns were raised that the school’s special needs pupils could easily become involved in an accident. The school worked as closely as possible with neighbours and village groups and the design of the boom barrier had been amended in response to concerns raised by the Parish Council. An Ofsted inspector had been asked for advice and recommended the boundary in Station Road be fenced to safeguard children. There had been an incident of a child in the past running out of the car park entrance on to the road in front of a vehicle as well as some near misses. The perimeters of the school had been carefully considered and the western and southern boundary would be fenced whilst retaining most of the hedging. The fence would not be in front of the school buildings up to the car park entrance, but this area was out of bounds for children and more easily supervised than the other boundaries. The DCM provided further clarification as follows: The existing hedgerow would not have to be removed to erect the new fence. A condition had been included that no machines should be used to erect the fence and that post holes should be hand dug to minimise the impact on the hedgerow and trees. Bow top fencing had been used successfully at other school sites including one that was located in an area of conservation. Whilst the barrier was an unusual feature the gradient on the site made it difficult for gates to swing open. A gate set to swing inwards would also restrict movement in the small car park. In answer to queries on the report the following was confirmed: Councillor Meredith’s comments that such a fence was a good way of maintaining security and ensuring pupils remained within the school were noted. To Councillor Meredith’s suggestion that there be further negotiations between the school and parish council it was noted a meeting between the 2 organisations had taken place. The fence would be screened by vegetation and the plans had been amended following the parish council’s original objection. To Councillor Pinnock it was noted the exact position of the fence had been considered but it was felt setting it back within the school grounds would create an area between the fence and road that would be difficult to maintain. Condition 5 of the proposed planning conditions requested a method statement for the erection of the new fencing and risk assessment of the potential for damage to the existing tress prior to commencement of works. As part of the method statement consideration to setting the fence slightly back to avoid damage to existing vegetation might be necessary. To Councillor Pinnock it was confirmed the current proposal was to site the fence along the line of the existing fence which was missing in places. In some areas the vegetation was quite thick but in other areas there were gaps. A landscaping condition could be required to fill gaps and replace any damage that might be caused. SNDC had also suggested vegetation could be allowed to grow through the fence and a condition for landscaping would help to secure this. Councillor Blackwell’s comments that safety of the pupils was paramount were noted. To Councillor Edwards it was confirmed all properties surrounding the school had been notified of the application. None of these had objected. No parents had objected to the application. Councillor Reichhold’s concerns that the Parish Council’s objections did not include adequate planning grounds for rejecting the application were noted. Councillor Lawman agreed with the report and suggested that condition 3 included a requirement that no construction traffic should be permitted to enter or leave the site during regular pupil arrival and departure hours. This should be added to the proposed planning conditions. RESOLVED by a vote of 5 in favour and 1 against that: the Development Control Committee granted planning permission subject to the conditions specified in Appendix A along with the following additional conditions: a) That the area around the fence be landscaped to enable vegetation to grow in front and through it; and b) that construction traffic should not be permitted to enter or leave the site during the times when pupils arrive and leave the school premises. 99/10 Erection of a single storey extensions to provide 6 new classrooms, DSP unit, new hall, WC’s, stores, office and staff room, internal and external refurbishment works to the existing school and associated external works including a new covered play areas, MUGA, car parking and a new vehicle access off John Clark Way at Denfield Park Junior School, Victoria Road, Rushden, NN10 0DA (10/00057/CCD: ENC Ref: 10/01574/NCC): The Chairman invited the DCM to introduce the report (copies of which had been previously circulated) who highlighted the following: Denfield Park Junior school was currently located on 2 sites, the one in the application having room for expansion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Seeks to Identify the Landscape and Visual Effects That Would Result from a Development
    APPENDIX 1 LANDSCAPE & VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT LANDSCAPE + VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT LILFORD LODGE MARINA nr BARNWELL NORTHAMPTONSHIRE September 2008 Updated February 2009 for A E DIJKSTERHUIS LILFORD LODGE FARM BARNWELL NORTHAMPTONSHIRE PE8 5SA LANDPLAN ASSOCIATES chartered landscape architects Barnwell All Saints Oundle Peterborough PE8 5PW 01832 272969 [email protected] Lilford Lodge Marina - Northamptonshire Landplan Associates – February 2009 Landscape + Visual Impact Assessment ref 254 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 POTENTIAL EFFECTS 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 4 BASELINE CONDITIONS 5 MITIGATION MEASURES 6 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS 7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS FIGURES Figure 1 Location plan Zone of Theoretical Visibility (ZTV) + Viewpoint locations plan APPENDICES Appendix 1 Principal Viewpoint photographs (shown as existing situation and after development if applicable) NRG ref. TL A view from A605 road 043 862 B A605 entrance to Oundle Town Rowing Club 041 864 C public footpath looking to south-west 038 867 D public footpath looking north 039 859 E public footpath junction with Stoke Doyle Road, looking east 028 868 F Pilton Manor - looking north-east 026 846 G view from R Nene – looking north 034 851 Lilford Lodge Marina - Northamptonshire Landplan Associates – February 2009 Landscape + Visual Impact Assessment ref 254 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Landplan Associates have been appointed to prepare an assessment of the landscape and visual impacts that would result from the proposed development of a riverside marina, to the north-west of Lilford Lodge Farm, off the A605, OS reference TL 035855 Landplan Associates are a Registered Practice of the Landscape Institute, with experience of landscape assessment, landscape design, urban design and landscape management for a broad range of development land uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Pre-Submission Draft East Northamptonshire Local Plan Part 2/ 2011-2031
    Pre-Submission Draft East Northamptonshire Local Plan Part 2/ 2011-2031 Regulation 19 consultation, February 2021 Contents Page Foreword 9 1.0 Introduction 11 2.0 Area Portrait 27 3.0 Vision and Outcomes 38 4.0 Spatial Development Strategy 46 EN1: Spatial development strategy EN2: Settlement boundary criteria – urban areas EN3: Settlement boundary criteria – freestanding villages EN4: Settlement boundary criteria – ribbon developments EN5: Development on the periphery of settlements and rural exceptions housing EN6: Replacement dwellings in the open countryside 5.0 Natural Capital – environment, Green Infrastructure, energy, 66 sport and recreation EN7: Green Infrastructure corridors EN8: The Greenway EN9: Designation of Local Green Space East Northamptonshire Council Page 1 of 225 East Northamptonshire Local Plan Part 2: Pre-Submission Draft (February 2021) EN10: Enhancement and provision of open space EN11: Enhancement and provision of sport and recreation facilities 6.0 Social Capital – design, culture, heritage, tourism, health 85 and wellbeing, community infrastructure EN12: Health and wellbeing EN13: Design of Buildings/ Extensions EN14: Designated Heritage Assets EN15: Non-Designated Heritage Assets EN16: Tourism, cultural developments and tourist accommodation EN17: Land south of Chelveston Road, Higham Ferrers 7.0 Economic Prosperity – employment, economy, town 105 centres/ retail EN18: Commercial space to support economic growth EN19: Protected Employment Areas EN20: Relocation and/ or expansion of existing businesses EN21: Town
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Resource Assessment of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northamptonshire
    East Midlands Archaeological Research Framework: Resource Assessment of Neolithic and Early Bronze Age Northamptonshire An Archaeological Resource Assessment of the Neolithic and Bronze Age in Northamptonshire Andy Chapman Note: For copyright reasons the figures are currently omitted from the web version of this paper. It is hoped to include them in future versions. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The intention behind the publication in 1989 of "Midlands Prehistory: Some recent and current researches into the prehistory of central England", was to show that the Midlands was "far from the prehistoric wilderness that was once envisaged" (Gibson 1989, 3). This collection of papers provided a demonstration of how the combined efforts of aerial photography, fieldwalking and rescue archaeology had brought life to a "desert" previously populated in the Neolithic and Bronze Age only by isolated oases of activity, such as the occasional round barrow. 1.2 The aim of this paper is to briefly review both the current state of knowledge for Neolithic and Bronze Age Northamptonshire, and the limitations and potential of the available evidence. There is no attempt to provide a synthesis of this data, although this paper does provide a first step on the approach to such a synthesis. A list of key sites and a bibliography are provided (Sites in bold type in the main text are those appearing in the list of key sites, which includes bibliographic details). 2. GEOGRAPHY AND SOILS 2.1 The county boundaries of Northamptonshire encompass the river Nene and its watershed, so the county can be considered to represent a single major geographical zone.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigations in the Anglian Region
    NRA Anglian 88 NAVIGATIONS IN THE ANGLIAN REGION NRA National Rivers Authority Anglian Region INTRODUCTION Great Ouse, Ancholme, Welland, Glen, Stour and the This guide has been produced by the Anglian Region of Middle Level System. the National Rivers Authority (NRA). Every effort has been made to ensure that the information The guide provides useful information for people wishing contained in this guide is accurate. No liability can be to navigation the Rivers Nene, accepted for any errors, inaccuracies or omissions. 2 NRA NAVIGATION STRATEGY For local information on the Great Ouse please contact our Brampton office on (0480) 414581. The National Navigation Strategy was published in the last quarter of 1993 and is one of a series of documents For local information on the Nene, Welland, Glen and setting out aims and objectives, and the means by which Ancholme please contact our Lincoln office on (0522) they will be achieved, across all NRA’s core functions. 513100. The principal aim is to maintain and improve inland waters For local information on the Stour please contact our and their facilities for use by public where the NRA is the Ipswich office on (0473) 727712. navigation authority. BOAT LICENSING AND REGISTRATION Key objectives of the strategy are to:- Details of regional requirements for the registration and • contribute to the development of an overall navigation licensing of craft to use the waterways described in this strategy for England and Wales; booklet are available from:- • regulate NRA navigations through the enforcement of a National Rivers Authority consistent series of licences, orders, byelaws and statutes; Anglian Region Kingfisher House • maintain and improve the NRA navigation fairway, Goldhay Way facilities and standards; and Orton Goldhay PETERBOROUGH PE2 5ZR • recover from users the costs of providing specific navigation facilities and a reasonable proportion of the Telephone (0733) 371811 costs of maintaining the navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Era-Aagli An. Box 5
    ErA-AAglian. Box 5 INTRODUCTION This guide has been produced by the Anglian Region of the Every effort has been made to ensure that the Environment Agency and provides useful information for information contained in this guide is accurate, but no people wishing to navigate the Rivers Nene, Great Ouse, liability can be accepted for any errors, inaccuracies or Ancholme, Welland, Glen, Stour and the Middle Level System. omissions. CONTENTS 089727 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Peterborough (01733) 371811. NAVIGATION STRATEGY For local information on the Great Ouse please contact our Brampton office on (01480) 414581. The National Navigation Strategy was published in the last quarter of 1993 and is one of a series of documents setting For local information on the Nene, Welland, Glen and out aims and objectives, and the means by which they will Ancholme please contact our Lincoln office on (01522) be achieved, across all the Agency's core functions. 513100. The principal aim is to maintain and improve inland waters For local information on the Stour please contact our and their facilities for use by public where the Agency is the Ipswich office on (01473) 727712. navigation authority. BOAT LICENSING AND Key objectives of the strategy are to:- REGISTRATION • contribute to the development of an overall navigation Details of regional requirements for the registration and strategy for England and Wales; licensing of craft to use the waterways described in this booklet are available from:- • regulate Agency navigations through the enforcement of a consistent series of licences, orders, byelaws and The Environment Agency statutes; Anglian Region Kingfisher House • maintain and improve the Agency navigation fairway, Goldhay Way facilities and standards; and Orton Goldhay PETERBOROUGH PE2 5ZR • recover from users the costs of providing specific navigation facilities and a reasonable proportion of the Telephone (01733) 371811 costs of maintaining the navigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Planning
    DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 18 February 2019 Case No: 18/01417/OUT Outline Application Proposal: Outline planning application for the demolition of two existing dwellings and erection of up to 185 dwellings with public open space, landscaping and sustainable drainage system (SuDS) and vehicular access point and separate pedestrian access from Peterborough Road and St Mary's Street. All matters reserved except for means of access Location: Land East Of 18 To 52 And Including 28 And 30 Peterborough Road Farcet, PE7 3BN Applicant: Gladman Developments Ltd Grid Ref: 520472 294895 RECOMMENDATION - APPROVE subject to the prior completion of a Section 106 obligation relating to affordable housing, open space and wheeled bins and to conditions to include as a minimum those listed below. or REFUSE in the event that the obligation referred to above has not been completed and the applicant is unwilling to agree to an extended period for determination, on the grounds that the applicant is unwilling to complete the obligation necessary to make the development acceptable. This application is reported to the Development Management Committee as it is a Departure from the Development Plan and Farcet Parish Council object to the application. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND APPLICATION 1.1 The site measures approx. 10.7 hectares, lies adjacent to the existing residential development on the edge of Farcet, Cambridgeshire and is approximately 3km south of Peterborough City Centre, between Yaxley and the Peterborough suburb of Stanground. 1.2 The site is located within a wider area of agricultural land and is currently in arable use (which a small slither is Grade 3 agricultural land the remainder Grade 4, on a scale of 1 – 5, where 1 is ‘excellent quality agricultural land’ and 5 is ‘very poor agricultural land’).
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, 22Nd July 1993
    12310 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 22ND JULY 1993 Exemptions to allow access for loading/unloading and for NOTTINGHAMSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL agricultural vehicles will be included in the Order. A copy of the proposed Order together with a plan showing the The Nottinghamshire County Council (Sturton-le-Steeple Area) exact lengths of road to which it relates and a statement of the (Weight Restriction) Order 1993 (510) Council's reasons for proposing to make the Order may be Notice is hereby given that the Nottinghamshire County Council has inspected, at the Library, Midland Road, Higham Ferrers, and the made an Order under section 1 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act Library, High Street, Raunds, during normal opening hours, or at 1984, as amended, the effects of which will be that, no Goods the offices of the undersigned between 10 a.m. to 12 noon and 2 p.m. Vehicle, the maximum gross weight of which exceeds 17 tonnes, shall to 4 p.m. Mondays to Fridays inclusive. proceed in the following lengths of road in the District of Bassetlaw: Reasons for making the Order: The proposed Order is being made to prevent heavy lorries from travelling through Stanwick to All roads (except those specified below) in the area bounded by the improve conditions in Stanwick and to increase road safety in the A631 road and the A620 road to the north, the A638 road to the village, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists. west, the AS7(T) to the south and the Nottinghamshire/ Objections to the proposed Order, stating the grounds on which Lincolnshire County Boundary to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments
    Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments May 2019 Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Mott MacDonald 22 Station Road Cambridge CB1 2JD United Kingdom T +44 (0)1223 463500 F +44 (0)1223 461007 mottmac.com Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Cambridgeshire and 402819 001 B Peterborough Combined Mott MacDonald Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments May 2019 Mott MacDonald Limited. Registered in England and Wales no. 1243967. Registered office: Mott MacDonald House, 8-10 Sydenham Road, Croydon CR0 2EE, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority United Kingdom Mott MacDonald | Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Local Transport Plan SEA - Environmental Report Appendix H - LTP Project Assessments Issue and Revision Record Revision Date Originator Checker Approver Description A 07.05.19 S Robinson N Levy S Price Issue for client comment J Hitchcock B 16.05.19 S Robinson N Levy J Hitchcock Second issue for comment Document reference: 402819 | 001 | B Information class: Standard This document is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above- captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. We accept no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property.
    [Show full text]
  • A47 Wansford to Sutton
    A47 WANSFORD TO SUTTON A47 WANSFORD TO SUTTON PCF STAGE 3 | | 11/09/20 Notice This document has been prepared on behalf of Galliford Try by Sweco UK Ltd for Highways England's Delivery Integration Partners (DiP) Framework. It is issued for the party which commissioned it and for specific purposes connected with the above-captioned project only. It should not be relied upon by any other party or used for any other purpose. Sweco UK Ltd accepts no responsibility for the consequences of this document being relied upon by any other party, or being used for any other purpose, or containing any error or omission which is due to an error or omission in data supplied to us by other parties. This document contains confidential information and proprietary intellectual property. It should not be shown to other parties without consent from Galliford Try. A47 WANSFORD TO SUTTON Highways England Programme Leader: Highways England Project Manager: Galliford Try Sweco Delivery Integration Partner, Project Manager: PCF STAGE 3 Supplier: Document control Client GALLIFORD TRY Project A47 WANSFORD TO SUTTON Document title Document reference Revision history Revision Purpose description Originator Checked Approved Authorised Date Prepared for: Prepared by: Galliford Try Sweco UK Ltd Cowley Business Park Grove House Cowley Mansion Gate Dr Uxbridge Leeds Middlesex LS7 4DN UB8 2AL A47 WANSFORD TO SUTTON Table of contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Context 1 1.2 Existing scheme section 2 1.3 Current traffic issues 3 1.4 Scheme objectives 4 1.5 Current stage of the project 6 1.6 The scheme 6 1.7 Purpose of the report 7 1.8 Report structure 7 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Page
    Contents Page Foreword 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Area Portrait 3.0 Vision and Outcomes 4.0 Spatial Development Strategy EN1: Spatial development strategy EN2: Settlement boundary criteria – urban areas EN3: Settlement boundary criteria – freestanding villages EN4: Settlement boundary criteria – ribbon developments EN5: Development on the periphery of settlements and rural exceptions housing EN6: Replacement dwellings in the open countryside 5.0 Natural Capital – environment, Green Infrastructure, energy, sport and recreation EN7: Green Infrastructure corridors EN8: The Greenway EN9: Designation of Local Green Space EN10: Enhancement and provision of open space EN11: Enhancement and provision of sport and recreation facilities 6.0 Social Capital – design, culture, heritage, tourism, health and wellbeing, community infrastructure EN12: Health and wellbeing EN13: Design of Buildings/ Extensions EN14: Designated Heritage Assets EN15: Non-Designated Heritage Assets EN16: Tourism, cultural developments and tourist accommodation EN17: Land south of Chelveston Road, Higham Ferrers 7.0 Economic Prosperity – employment, economy, town centres/ retail EN18: Commercial space to support economic growth EN19: Protected Employment Areas EN20: Relocation and/ or expansion of existing businesses EN21: Town centres and primary shopping frontages EN22: Impact test thresholds for retail development EN23: Development of main town centre uses around the local centres 8.0 Housing Delivery – housing mix/ tenure, affordable housing, specialist housing, market delivery,
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Download/4721/Local Plan Part 2 - Documents 11 to Add Following Conclusion of Regulation 19 Consultation, March 19Th 2021
    Contents Page EN12: Health and wellbeing EN13: Design of Buildings/ Extensions Foreword 3 EN14: Designated Heritage Assets 1.0 Introduction 5 EN15: Non-Designated Heritage Assets EN16: Tourism, cultural 2.0 Area Portrait 23 developments and tourist accommodation EN17: Land south of Chelveston 3.0 Vision and Outcomes 35 Road, Higham Ferrers 4.0 Spatial Development Strategy 43 7.0 Economic Prosperity – employment, 103 economy, town centres/ retail EN1: Spatial development strategy EN18: Commercial space to support economic growth EN2: Settlement boundary criteria – urban areas EN19: Protected Employment Areas EN3: Settlement boundary criteria – freestanding villages EN20: Relocation and/ or expansion of existing businesses EN4: Settlement boundary criteria – ribbon developments EN21: Town centres and primary shopping frontages EN5: Development on the periphery of settlements and EN22: Impact test thresholds for rural exceptions housing retail development EN6: Replacement dwellings in EN23: Development of main the open countryside town centre uses around the local centres 5.0 Natural Capital – environment, Green 63 Infrastructure, energy, sport and 8.0 Housing Delivery – housing mix/ 131 recreation tenure, affordable housing, specialist housing, market delivery, site specific EN7: Green Infrastructure allocations corridors EN24: Oundle housing EN8: The Greenway allocations EN9: Designation of Local Green EN25: Land rear of Cemetery, Space Stoke Doyle Road, Oundle EN10: Enhancement and EN26: Cotterstock Road/ St provision of open space Peter's
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary Background The
    Market Towns Initiative – Oundle Healthcheck Report 2007 Executive summary Background The Oundle Healthcheck Report is the result of the Oundle Healthcheck project funded by East Northamptonshire Council (ENC) and the Welland Sub Regional Strategic Partnership (SSP) in 2005. The project was led by East Northamptonshire Council and was undertaken in line with the Healthcheck methodology set out in the Countryside Agency’s Market Towns Initiative. An important aspect of the initiative is that it aims to involve the local community in making decisions and taking responsibility for the future of their town. The Healthcheck Process The Healthcheck process was undertaken by the Market Towns Project Officer from East Northamptonshire Council. The work was supported by the Oundle Partnership and the community of Oundle and its hinterland. The Oundle Partnership was established as a result of an open evening in November 2005. Following this a gathering took place in February 2006, which resulted in setting up the Oundle Partnership Steering Group. The main objective of the Steering Group is to guide the healthcheck process and complete the second phase by developing a detailed action plan and putting it into action. The Healthcheck process has taken a snapshot of the town and its surrounding area, but also has looked at past pieces of work and the wider context such as local and regional policies. The snapshot incorporates a comprehensive appraisal of the town’s strengths and weaknesses, highlighting the key things local people would like to preserve and see improved. The document also includes information in relation to the threats to Oundle, as part of the Milton Keynes South Midlands growth agenda.
    [Show full text]