The Seventh Ecumenical Council and the Veneration of Icons in Orthodoxy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Divine Liturgy
THE DIVINE LITURGY OF OUR FATHER AMONG THE SAINTS JOHN CHRYSOSTOM H QEIA LEITOURGIA TOU EN AGIOIS PATROS HMWN IWANNOU TOU CRUSOSTOMOU St Andrew’s Orthodox Press SYDNEY 2005 First published 1996 by Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Australia 242 Cleveland Street Redfern NSW 2016 Australia Reprinted with revisions and additions 1999 Reprinted with further revisions and additions 2005 Reprinted 2011 Copyright © 1996 Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Australia This work is subject to copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted without prior written permission from the publisher. Enquiries should be addressed to the publisher. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data The divine liturgy of our father among the saints John Chrysostom = I theia leitourgia tou en agiois patros imon Ioannou tou Chrysostomou. ISBN 0 646 44791 2. 1. Orthodox Eastern Church. Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom. 2. Orthodox Eastern Church. Prayer-books and devotions. 3. Prayers. I. Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of Australia. 242.8019 Typeset in 11/12 point Garamond and 10/11 point SymbolGreek II (Linguist’s Software) CONTENTS Preface vii The Divine Liturgy 1 ïH Qeiva Leitourgiva Conclusion of Orthros 115 Tevlo" tou' ÒOrqrou Dismissal Hymns of the Resurrection 121 ÆApolutivkia ÆAnastavsima Dismissal Hymns of the Major Feasts 127 ÆApolutivkia tou' Dwdekaovrtou Other Hymns 137 Diavforoi ÓUmnoi Preparation for Holy Communion 141 Eujcai; pro; th'" Qeiva" Koinwniva" Thanksgiving after Holy Communion 151 Eujcaristiva meta; th;n Qeivan Koinwnivan Blessing of Loaves 165 ÆAkolouqiva th'" ÆArtoklasiva" Memorial Service 177 ÆAkolouqiva ejpi; Mnhmosuvnw/ v PREFACE The Divine Liturgy in English translation is published with the blessing of His Eminence Archbishop Stylianos of Australia. -
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Byzantine Liturgy and The
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Byzantine Liturgy and the Primary Chronicle A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures by Sean Delaine Griffin 2014 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Byzantine Liturgy and the Primary Chronicle by Sean Delaine Griffin Doctor of Philosophy in Slavic Languages and Literatures University of California, Los Angeles, 2014 Professor Gail Lenhoff, Chair The monastic chroniclers of medieval Rus’ lived in a liturgical world. Morning, evening and night they prayed the “divine services” of the Byzantine Church, and this study is the first to examine how these rituals shaped the way they wrote and compiled the Povest’ vremennykh let (Primary Chronicle, ca. 12th century), the earliest surviving East Slavic historical record. My principal argument is that several foundational accounts of East Slavic history—including the tales of the baptism of Princess Ol’ga and her burial, Prince Vladimir’s conversion, the mass baptism of Rus’, and the martyrdom of Princes Boris and Gleb—have their source in the feasts of the liturgical year. The liturgy of the Eastern Church proclaimed a distinctively Byzantine myth of Christian origins: a sacred narrative about the conversion of the Roman Empire, the glorification of the emperor Constantine and empress Helen, and the victory of Christianity over paganism. In the decades following the conversion of Rus’, the chroniclers in Kiev learned these narratives from the church services and patterned their own tales of Christianization after them. The ii result was a myth of Christian origins for Rus’—a myth promulgated even today by the Russian Orthodox Church—that reproduced the myth of Christian origins for the Eastern Roman Empire articulated in the Byzantine rite. -
Liturgical Architecture: the Layout of a Byzantine Church Building
Liturgical Architecture: The Layout of a Byzantine Church Building Each liturgical tradition has its own requirements and expectations for the liturgical space; here, we will look at the St. Nicholas Church building and its symbolism in the Byzantine tradition. The nave The most ancient plan of Christian architecture is probably the basilica, the large rectangular room used for public meetings, and many Byzantine churches today are organized around a large liturgical space, called the nave (from the Greek word for a ship, referring to the ark of Noah in which human beings were saved from the flood). The nave is the place where the community assembles for prayer, and symbolically represents the Church "in pilgrimage" - the Church in the world. It is normally adorned with icons of the Lord, the angels and the saints, allowing us to see and remember the "cloud of witnesses" who are present with us at the liturgy. At St. Nicholas, the nave opens upward to a dome with stained glass of the Eucharist chalice and the Holy Spirit above the congregation. The nave is also provided with lights that at specific times the church interior can be brightly lit, especially at moments of great joy in the services, or dimly lit, like during parts of the Liturgy of Presanctified Gifts. The nave, where the congregation resides during the Divine Liturgy, at St. Nicholas is round, representing the endlessness of eternity. The principal church building of the Byzantine Rite, the Church of Holy Wisdom (Hagia Sophia) in Constantinople, employed a round plan for the nave, and this has been imitated in many Byzantine church buildings. -
Conceptualizing Angeloi in the Roman Empire. by Rangar Cline. (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 172.) Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011
Numen 60 (2013) 135–154 brill.com/nu Ancient Angels: Conceptualizing Angeloi in the Roman Empire. By Rangar Cline. (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World 172.) Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2011. xviii + 181 pp. ISBN 978–9004194533 (hbk.) The theme of the book is veneration of angels in religions in late antiquity (ca. 150–ca. 450 c.e.). Rangar Cline consults a wealth of archaeological and lit- erary evidence and shows that there was a shared terminology for angels in the Roman Empire, which implies that the term angelos was used across religions. Angeloi designate intermediate beings, beings that were believed to exist between gods and humans. Traditionally, they were thought to be present at springs, wells, and fountains, and they could be contacted by means of rituals, amulets, and invocations. The veneration of these beings took diffferent forms in diffferent regions and cultural contexts. The book has a preface, six chapters, and a conclusion, and includes pic- tures. In chapter one (“Introduction: The Words of Angels”), Cline defijines angels and gives a survey of the pagan-Christian discourse on them by means of the writings of Origen of Alexandria and Augustine of Hippo. Cline suggests that “the prominence of angeli in early Christianity is due to the success of early Christian authorities in defijining a system of orthodox Christian beliefs about, and attitudes towards, angeli that were distinct from non-Christian, and other Christian, beliefs about such beings” (p. 2). In addition to the term ange- los, Cline also presents a critical discussion of the use of the terms “Hellenism,” “monotheism,” and “polytheism.” Cline’s study of angels builds on Glenn Bow- ersock’s approach to Hellenism and Greek language in late antiquity: Bower- sock saw Hellenism as a possibility to give local expressions a more eloquent and cosmopolitan form. -
Life with Augustine
Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture. -
& What You Can Do to Help… Why It Has Endured 2000 Years …
Seeking and Understanding your Religious Heritage Why it has endured 2000 years …. & What you can do to help… WEAVING THE FABRIC OF HISTORY Το έργο αυτό έρχεται να συμπληρώσει και να αναδείξει την πίστη των χριστιανών μιας ιστορικής και πολιτιστικής κληρονομίας 2000 και πλέων ετών . Για αυτό και πρέπει να διατηρηθεί και να αντέξει στους αιώνες των αιώνων . Οι κτήτορες αυτού του Ιερού Ναού θα μείνουν στην ιστορία και θα τους μνημονεύουν αιωνίως . Θα καμαρώνουν τα εγγόνια τους , οι συγγενείς τους και οι επόμενες γενιές για την συμβολή τους σε αυτό το Έργο . Που είναι καταφύγιο και αποκούμπι για τις κακουχίες και τις θεομηνίες των καιρών μας. Θα μείνουμε στην μνήμη των συγγενών μας ως πρωτοπόροι και θεμελιωτές μια αντάξιας προσπάθειας συνεχίσεως της ιστορικής βυζαντινής κληρονομιάς των προγόνων μας. Τέλος όλοι μπορούν και πρέπει να συμβάλουν στην ανέγερση του Ιερού Ναού για την συνέχιση της Ιστορίας και τις Ορθοδοξίας. This Authentic Basilica complements and highlights Christian beliefs that have a historical, cultural and religious heritage of 2000 years and more. We have been given the responsibility to continue this legacy and help it to endure for centuries to come. The faithful that have and will continue to contribute to help build this holy temple will be remembered in history. The benefactors of this historic project will bestow upon their children and grandchildren for many generations the opportunity to become the torch bearers of Christendom. HOLY RELICS SOLEA Sanctuary NAVE Dedication or Sponsoring opportunities for Bell Tower Bell Tower- three- tiered Bell Tower $100,000.00 (Donors will have individual recognition both upstairs and downstairs on interior walls of Bell Tower) Bell Tower Elevator Handicap Accessible $150,000.00 (Donor will have individual recognition outside elevator as well as inside elevator) Bell Large $ 14,000.00 Bell Medium $ 9,000.00 Bell Small $ 6,000.00 (Donors will have their names engraved on bells.) The three bells will be made in Romania. -
The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople1
STEFANOS ATHANASIOU The Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople1 A Religious Minority and a Global Player Introduction In the extended family of the Orthodox Church of the Byzantine rite, it is well known that the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople takes honorary prece- dence over all other Orthodox autocephalous and autonomous churches.2 The story of its origins is well known. From a small church on the bay of the Bos- porus in the fishing village of Byzantium, to the centre of Eastern Christianity then through the transfer of the Roman imperial capital from Rome to Constantinople in the fourth century, and later its struggle for survival in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey. Nevertheless, a discussion of the development of the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople is required to address the newly- kindled discussion between the 14 official Orthodox autocephalous churches on the role of the Ecumenical Patriarchate in today’s Orthodox world. A recalling of apposite historical events is relevant to this discussion. As Karl Löwith remarks, “[H]istorical consciousness can only begin with itself, although its intention is to visualise the thinking of other times and other people. History must continually be recalled, reconsidered and re-explored by each current living generation” (Löwith 2004: 12). This article should also be understood with this in mind. It is intended to awaken old memories for reconsideration and reinterpretation. Since the fall of Constantinople in 1453, the Ecumenical Patriarchate has taken up the role of custodian of the Byzantine tradition and culture and has lived out this tradition in its liturgical life in the region of old Byzantium (Eastern Roman Empire) and then of the Ottoman Empire and beyond. -
The Great and Holy Synod and Why It Is Important for Orthodoxy
The Great and Holy Synod And Why It is Important for Orthodoxy Background Information—The Ecumenical Councils In the year 325, the Emperor Constantine convened the First Ecumenical Council in Nicea. Why? To put order where there was chaos. In the first three centuries of Christianity, the church was underground and persecuted. When Christianity became the legal religion of the Roman Empire in the early 4th century, as the churches of the various cities began communicating openly, there was disagreement, even scandal and heresy, because there was not agreement on basic tenets of the faith. The First Ecumenical Council gathered all the bishops of all the churches together, and after deliberation and prayer, the result of this Council was the Nicene Creed (our confession of faith) and the Canon of Scripture. Between 325 and 787, seven such Councils were held, which have given us the backbone of our Orthodox theology and praxis. For a Council to be truly “Ecumenical”, it means that all the churches are involved. Following the Great Schism in 1054, and now the further fracturing of Christianity into thousands of denominations, it is not possible to have a Council that is truly “Ecumenical.” The Autocephalous Churches In the Ancient Church, there were five “Patriarchates”—Rome, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria. It is not the Orthodox “tradition” to have one “pope” who speaks infallibly for the whole church. Rather, our system of governance is “collegial” or “synodical.” There were, in the beginning, five autocephalous, or self- governing churches, each being led by a “Patriarch.” The Patriarch of Constantinople is recognized as the “Ecumenical Patriarch.” While he does not have administrative authority over the “Autocephalous” Churches, when all the churches gather together, he sits as the “first among equals.” The Seven Ecumenical Councils, or Synods, were convened under the “synodical” system that was the “tradition” among the ancient Patriarchates. -
1 Fggfghfghgh Through the Prayers of Our Holy Fathers, O Lord Jesus Christ Our God, Have Mercy on Us. Amen. O God, Be Merciful
Byzantine Prayer of Consecration to the Most Holy Theotokos, Mother of the Church Through the prayers of our holy fathers, O Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us. Amen. O God, be merciful to me a sinner. Christ is risen from the dead! By death he trampled Death; and to those in the tombs he granted life. (Three times) Holy God, Holy and Mighty, Holy and Immortal, have mercy on us. (Three times) Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever and forever. Amen. Most Holy Trinity, have mercy on us; Lord, cleanse us of our sins; Master, forgive our transgressions; Holy One, come to us and heal our infirmities for your name’s sake. Lord, have mercy. (Three times) Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever and forever. Amen. Our Father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name; thy kingdom come; thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread; and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us; and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. fggfghfghgh Through the prayers of our holy fathers, O Lord Jesus Christ our God, have mercy on us. Amen. Lord, have mercy. (Twelve times) Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Spirit, now and ever and forever. Amen. Come, let us worship our King and God. Come, let us worship Christ, our King and God. -
Special Feature "The Vicissitudes of the Sufi Movement In
<Special Feature "The Vicissitudes of the Sufi Movement in Society: Past and Present">Towards a Dynamic View of Title Sufism and Saint Veneration in Islam: An Anthropological Approach Author(s) AKAHORI, Masayuki イスラーム世界研究 : Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies Citation (2015), 8: 57-68 Issue Date 2015-03-16 URL http://dx.doi.org/10.14989/198358 ©京都大学大学院アジア・アフリカ地域研究研究科附属 Right イスラーム地域研究センター 2015 Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher Kyoto University イスラーム世界研究 第 8 巻(2015 年 3Towards 月)57‒68 a Dynamic 頁 View of Sufism and Saint Veneration in Islam Kyoto Bulletin of Islamic Area Studies, 8 (March 2015), pp. 57–68 Towards a Dynamic View of Sufism and Saint Veneration in Islam: An Anthropological Approach AKAHORI Masayuki* Based on the fieldwork I conducted in San Francisco in the U.S.A., and the city of Tanta and the Western Desert of Egypt, this paper deals with popular aspects of Sufism that might seem trivial compared to the faith’s esoteric, mystical dimension. However, in order to grasp Sufism in general, it is important to understand how ordinary Sufis —— who are not highly educated and do not long for spiritual transcendence —— view their faith. In addition, I present examples of people performing rituals that resemble the Sufi tradition of dhikr (a devotional act for remembering God) without any connection to Sufism itself. These examples show that while Sufism and saint veneration in Islam are essentially distinct religious phenomena, they also influence each other in diverse ways and various social and historical contexts. I. Tonaga’s Theory: A Three-Axis Framework of Sufism The starting point is a three-axis framework of Sufism proposed by Tonaga [2006] in which he says that three main elements can be seen throughout the faith. -
Hymns and Readings for Sunday, February 17, 2019 Sunday of the Publican and the Pharisee - Triodion Begins
WELCOME TO SAINT CATHERINE GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH “There are no strangers here; only friends you have not met!” 5555 S. Yosemite Street, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Phone 303-773-3411 ● Fax 303-773-6641 www.stcatherinechurch.org ● [email protected] Office hours: 9am - 4pm Sundays hours of service: Orthros 8:15am Divine Liturgy 9:30am Weekdays hours of service: Orthros 8:15am, Divine Liturgy 9am Clergy: Father Louis J. Christopulos, Protopresbyter ● Father Paul Fedec, Archpriest ● Deacon John Kavas Staff: Michelle Smith, Office Administrator ● Alina Buzdugan, Ministry Coordinator/Communications/Chanting Alex Demos, Pastoral Assistant to Fr. Lou and Youth Director Brenda Lucero, Accountant ● Steven Woodruff, Facility Manager 2019 Parish Council: Stu Weinroth, President ● Jenée Horan, 1st VP Fellowship ● Dr. Leon Greos, 2nd VP Stewardship Helen Terry, Secretary ● Brian Farr, Treasurer ● Spiros Deligiannis ● Billy Halax ● Dr. Jeff Holen ● Eldon Keller Louis Sokach ● Andy Stathopulos ● George Strompolos ● Dr. Harry Stathos ● Mark Terry HYMNS AND READINGS FOR SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2019 SUNDAY OF THE PUBLICAN AND THE PHARISEE - TRIODION BEGINS Resurrectional Apolytikion – 5h Tone (Green Hymnal pg. 85) Eternal with the Father and the Spirit is the Word, Who of a Virgin was begotten for our salvation. As the faithful we both praise and worship Him, for in the flesh did He consent to ascend unto the Cross, and death did He endure and He raised unto life the dead through His all glorious resurrection. Hymn of St. Catherine - 5th Tone We sing praises in memory of the bride of Christ, Catherine the Holy Protectress of Holy Mount Sinai, of her who is our help- er and our comforter, silencing the impious ones with her brilliance. -
The Fener Greek Patriarchate
PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS March - May 1998 Volume III - Number 1 THE FENER GREEK PATRIARCHATE A. SUAT BİLGE Dr. A. Suat Bilge is Professor of International Relations and Ambassador (retired). A controversy concerning the Fener Greek Patriarchate started in Turkey in 1997. It was stated that the Patriarchate could be used both for and against the interests of Turkey. On the one hand, it was claimed that the Patriarchate had intentions to establish itself as an ecumenical church and become a state like the Vatican; that the Orthodox world was trying to gain power in Turkey. On the other hand, some people stated that Turkey could benefit from the prestigious position of the Patriarchate and suggested an improvement in its status. First of all, I want to stress that the Patriarchate no longer enjoys the importance it once possessed in Greek-Turkish relations. Today, the Patriarchate is trying to become influential in Turkish-American relations. The Fener Greek Patriarchate is a historical religious institution. After the division of the Roman Empire, it became the church of the Byzantine Empire and obtained the status of an ecumenical church. With the collapse of the Byzantine Empire, the Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Ottoman Empire. Besides its functions as a religious institution, the Patriarchate was also granted the right to act as a ministry of Greek affairs by Mehmet II. He granted increased authority and privileges to the Patriarch. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Fener Greek Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Republic of Turkey.