DOCSLIB.ORG

Illegal Construction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Illegal Construction Corrective Actions If you find that you are in violation of DC construction code requirements, stop work immediately and get the proper permits. If you have questions, call (202) 442-4400. DCRA Mission: The Department of Consumer and RESIDENT’S GUIDE Reporting Illegal Construction Regulatory Affairs protects the health, safety, economic interests and quality of life Illegal construction threatens the safety of all DC of residents, businesses and visitors in the citizens. District of Columbia by issuing licenses and permits, conducting inspections, enforcing To report illegal construction at any time, day or Illegal Construction night, call DCRA’s Illegal Construction Unit: building, housing, and safety codes, (202) 442-STOP(7867). regulating land use and development, in the District of and providing consumer education and Columbia Please give the address and describe the illegal advocacy services. construction. Know what to do! The Unit will schedule an inspection to investigate. Don’t Work Illegally • Get building permits for your project • Make sure any contractors or subcontractors get DC Department of Consumer and permits Regulatory Affairs 941 North Capitol St NE 2nd Floor • Only do work in the scope of your permit Washington DC 20002 • Work only 7 am - 7 pm (202) 442-4400 • Work only Monday - Saturday www.dcra.dc.gov Building for the Future Anthony A. Williams Mayor, Government of the District of Columbia Patrick J. Canavan, Psy. D. Director, Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs You need a raze permit for demolition of buildings You can get the following information for building Make sure you have the and structures. To raze structures larger than permit applications from www.dcra.dc.gov: 500 square feet, you must show a certificate of appropriate permits for your insurance for $500,000 in coverage. • Building Permit Application and Fee Schedules • Building Codes project. Your project may require water or sewer excavation permits or supplemental systems • Contract Agreement installation permits. Only licensed DC contractors • Environmental Questionnaire What is illegal construction? Who is within each trade may apply for these permits. responsible for enforcing the District of What Work Does NOT Require a Permit? Columbia Construction Code? Work that requires a water or sewer excavation permit includes: Unless you live in a historic district, these projects Any construction done without required building • Water or sewer pipe installation do not require a permit: permits is illegal construction. Illegal construction is • Connections to water and sewer mains in the a public danger; it can hurt people and property. • Brick pointing street • Caulking, patching, and plaster repair To protect the public, DCRA has started an Illegal • Excavation for water meters and vaults in public • Installation of cabinets and architectural Construction Unit. It focuses on illegal construction space millwork complaints from citizens and police officers. • Installation of window screens and storm Work that requires a supplemental systems windows installation permit includes: What Work Requires a Permit? • Repair of existing fences with like materials • Retaining walls, 18 inches (0.46M) or less in Several types of permits are required for • Air conditioning installation height construction and improvements. They are: • Refrigeration system installation • Construction of garden storage sheds complying • Building permits • Plumbing fixture installation with DC Code section 107.3.3 • Public space permits • Electrical installation • Painting, if it is not with fire-retardant paint • Replacement of: • Raze permits • Gas appliance installation - non-rated windows and doors • Water and sewer excavation permits There is a fee for each permit and an additional fee - roofing and coping • Supplemental systems installation permits for any work in a public space. - siding - gutters and downspouts These types of work require building permits: - private sidewalks and driveways Penalties - patios • New construction - non-rated suspended ceiling tile There is a $2000 fine for each offense, if you: - floor coverings • Additions - up to 160 square feet (9.3m) of gypsum • Work without a permit • Demolition board • Work outside the scope of a permit - up to 50 linear feet (15.24m) of storm • Construction of retaining walls, decks, fences, • Work before 7 am or after 7 pm Monday- drain piping sheds, garages, and vaults Saturday or any time on Sunday - up to 10 linear feet (3.05m) of • Erection of signs or awnings sanitary/drainage system piping If you break these laws again, you may be fined up - up to 20 linear feet (6.10m) of sanitary to $4,000. You need a public space permit for: venting piping - up to 50 linear feet (15.24m) of hydraulic If you get a Stop Work Order for illegal construction, • Dumpsters in public space system piping you will also have to pay a fine of 50% of the permit - up to 10 linear feet (3.05m) of duct work, • Sidewalk construction and repair you should have gotten. DCRA will not release the in non-hazardous and commercial • Flag poles, planter boxes, retaining walls, and Stop Work Order until you pay the permit fee and kitchen exhaust systems fences in public space fine..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Case Study on Stopping Illegal Construction in Kosovo
    How to Clean Up a City – a Case Study on Stopping Illegal Construction in Kosovo Commandment number 2 in promising to combat corruption in a small, developing country is to have a long-term, strategic plan. But perhaps that was not important because the newly elected Mayor of Prishtina, Shpend Ahmeti, might have not thought of commandment number 1, which is that there is a possibility that someone will kill you for undertaking this endeavor. In 2000, just after the war in Kosovo ended, Rexhep Luci, the city planning director working for the UN, was shot six times and killed because he was trying to stop the illegal constructions that had already become a problem in the capital city.[1] This murder case has still not been resolved. 15 years later, Mayor Ahmeti campaigned for mayor by promising to restore the faith of the residents of Prishtina in local governance and rule of law. Among his promises, including 24/7 water supply and a modern urban transport that would replace the old buses of former Yugoslavia, the soon-to-be Mayor pledged to deal with the illegal construction that had overtaken Kosovo’s capital city’s landscape. Five months into his mandate, an assassination plan against him was exposed; his plans to regulate construction in the capital city did not fit well with large companies that had been profiting off this unregulated landscape mess. That did not stop Mayor Ahmeti from waging a war against the illegal construction, as he had promised during the campaign. Overbuilding in Peace After the war in 1999, construction became the most profitable business of choice by large businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions Adopted by the World Heritage Committee at Its 37Th Session (Phnom Penh, 2013)
    World Heritage 37 COM WHC-13/37.COM/20 Paris, 5 July 2013 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE World Heritage Committee Thirty-seventh session Phnom Penh, Cambodia 16 - 27 June 2013 DECISIONS ADOPTED BY THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE AT ITS 37TH SESSION (PHNOM PENH, 2013) Table of content 2. Requests for Observer status ................................................................................ 3 3A. Provisional Agenda of the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee (Phnom Penh, 2013) ......................................................................................................... 3 3B. Provisional Timetable of the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee (Phnom Penh, 2013) ......................................................................................................... 3 5A. Report of the World Heritage Centre on its activities and the implementation of the World Heritage Committee’s Decisions ................................................................... 4 5B. Reports of the Advisory Bodies ................................................................................. 5 5C. Summary and Follow-up of the Director General’s meeting on “The World Heritage Convention: Thinking Ahead” (UNESCO HQs, 2-3 October 2012) ............................. 5 5D. Revised PACT Initiative Strategy............................................................................ 6 5E. Report on
    [Show full text]
  • CBCGDF's Efforts in Biodiversity Conservation CONNENTS
    China Biodiversity Conservation and Green Development Foundation: Efforts to Conserve Biodiversity (a draft on Mar 2019) CBCGDF’s Efforts in Biodiversity Conservation CONNENTS .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1. Sustainable communities: Community Conservation Area for (CCAfa) ...................................................................... 3 2. Conserve Biodiversity Via Environmental Public Interest Litigations (EPIL) ............................................................... 4 Typical Case: Acer Pentaphyllum – China’s first EPIL to protected an Endangered Plant ................................ 4 Typical Case: Environmental Public Interest Litigation filed by CBCGDF to Safeguard General Public's Free Passage and Rights of Enjoying Beautiful Environment" Accepted by Local Court ........................................... 5 Typical Case: Tengger Desert Pollution ...................................................................................................................................... 6 XINHUA News Report: China's desert pollution case settled by mediation .............................................. 6 ELI’s news report: A Key Victory for Citizen Suits in China ................................................................................ 7 ChinaDaily Reports: Tengger case shows even big firms can't escape penalty for polluting .............
    [Show full text]
  • Faa Section 119 Biodiversity Assessement Update for Serbia And
    FAA SECTION 119 BIODIVERSITY ASSESSEMENT UPDATE FOR SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO Prepared by: Alicia P. Grimes USAID Bureau for Economic Growth Agriculture and Trade/Office of Natural Resources Management/Forestry Team/Natural Resources Management Specialist and E&E Liaison, Washington, D.C. Mohammad A. Latif, P.E. REA USAID Europe and Eurasia Bureau (E&E)/Regional Environmental Officer, Washington, D.C. Jelena Vujadinovic-Colic ACDI/VOCA /Environmental Officer; Biodiversity Specialist-Serbia Vasilije Buskovic, M.Sc. Institute for Nature Protection and Consultant Biodiversity Specialist, Montenegro Submitted to: Michelle Stern, Program Office (Copies to: Mark Pickett, Vladan Raznatovic, & Michael Boyd) USAID/Serbia-Montenegro September 8, 2005 Biodiversity 119 Assessment 2005 Update: Serbia/Montenegro Page No. INTRODUCTION 1 PART I. REPUBLIC OF SERBIA A. Importance of Biodiversity and Actions Necessary for Conservation 2 1. Importance of Biodiversity and Critical Habitats 2 2. Threats to Biodiversity 3 a. direct threats/impacts b. threats due to institutional /legal and socio-economic factors 3. Conservation Actions undertaken by Host Country, Civil Society, Donors 6 4. Conclusion: Actions Necessary To Conserve Biodiversity 10 PART II. REPUBLIC OF MONTENEGRO A. Importance of Biodiversity and Actions Necessary for Conservation 13 1. Importance of Biodiversity and Critical Habitats 13 2. Threats to Biodiversity 13 a. direct threats/impacts b. threats due to institutional /legal and socio-economic factors 3. Conservation Actions undertaken by Host Country, Civil Society, Donors 17 4. Conclusion: Actions Necessary To Conserve Biodiversity 20 PART III. EXTENT TO WHICH USAID ACTIONS CONTRIBUTE TO THE NEEDS IDENTIFIED IN SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO A. Current/On Going Programs 23 B. Future Programming 25 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Eating up the Amazon
    GREENPEACE EATING UP THE AMAZON April 6, 2006 An ongoing investigation by Netherlands-based Greenpeace International of Brazil’s booming soy industry uncovers new evidence linking U.S. multinationals to deforestation, land theft, and slavery in the Amazon. By building soy silos and terminals at the rainforest edge, funding the paving of illegal roads, and buying soy from illegally cleared and operated farms, including farms with a documented record of slave labor, Cargill, ADM and Bunge are both spurring and profiting from the soy plunder of the Amazon. Executive Summary The Amazon rainforest is one of the richest and most biologically diverse regions on the planet—home to nearly ten percent of all known mammals and fifteen percent of terrestrial plants. It is also among the world’s most threatened ecosystems, vanishing at a rate of nearly 7,000 mi2 per year. In the last 25 years, an area of ancient forest larger than California has been lost forever from the Amazon. In recent years, the Brazilian Government has taken important steps to combat illegal logging and other causes of Amazon deforestation. At the same time, a significant new threat has emerged at the forefront of Amazon destruction: the soybean. Massive investments by U.S. agribusiness have made the Amazon forest Brazil’s newest agricultural frontier. By 2004, nearly three million acres of rainforest had been converted to soy agriculture. Although this represents only five percent of the total area currently under soy production in Brazil, and many older soy plantations were converted from already deforested ranchlands, new investments in roads, silos and frontier ports by Cargill and others are making it more profitable to burn virgin forest than buy already cleared land, and driving soy’s expansion into the Amazon at an ever faster pace.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Villages in China: Issues from Rapid Urbanization and Society
    Urban Villages in China: Issues from Rapid Urbanization and Society Transformation A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning in the School of Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, & Planning By Yuqiong Cheng Bachelor of Architecture, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China, June 2006 Chair: Menelaos Triantafillou Committee Member: Jay Chatterjee 2 ABSTRACT Urban villages have emerged as a unique phenomenon in China, resulting from rapid urbanization, and then they affect the development of Chinese cities. This thesis analyzes urban villages in China, their characteristics and existing renewal efforts, and tries to investigate proposed solutions to improve their physical renewal, housing provisions, management regulations, and socio-cultural conditions. The city of Shenzhen is used as a major case study to illustrate the issues with urban villages. Through the analysis of several data and physical conditions, the problem of urban villages in the city is assessed as well as the current need for solutions. The review of literature and policy analysis showed that current policy makes urban village reform more difficult, while current renewal patterns can work for different conditions of urban villages. Through case studies, lessons from history and successful cases are used to improve the quality of life for the needs of the innovations of urban villages. Based on the above findings, a recommended concept design is proposed and is applied to a real urban village in the city of Shenzhen. The key words Urban Village, Land Use, Urbanization, Urban Renewal 3 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my Chair, Professor Menelaos Triantafillou, who as my advisor helped me progress, diligently read all my drafts, and guided me through the development of my thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • “Zoning Reconciliation” in Local Governments “İmar Barışı” Düzenlemesinin Yerel Yönetimler Düzeyinde Etkilerinin Analizi
    202 Planlama 2019;29(3):202–209 | doi: 10.14744/planlama.2019.04796 ARTICLE / ARAŞTIRMA Analysis of the Regulation of “Zoning Reconciliation” in Local Governments “İmar Barışı” Düzenlemesinin Yerel Yönetimler Düzeyinde Etkilerinin Analizi Zeynel Abidin Polat Department of Geomatics Engineering, İzmir Katip Çelebi University Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, İzmir, Turkey ABSTRACT ÖZ Urbanisation has emerged with the increase of migration from Kırsal alandan kentsel alanlara göçlerin artmasıyla birlikte kent- rural areas to cities. As a result of increasing urbanisation, the leşme olgusu ortaya çıkmıştır. Artan kentleşmenin neticesinde demand for housing has grown, and consequently, housing pro- konut ihtiyacı da artmış ve sonuçta konut üretimi de hızlan- duction has accelerated. In beginning of 2000s rapid population mıştır. 2000’li yılların başına kadar hızlı nüfus artışına rağmen growth and the lack of housing inventory have forced those aynı oranda artmayan konut stoku, kırdan kente göçen nüfusun migrating from the city to meet their own needs for housing kendi barınma ihtiyacını büyük ölçüde kent çeperinde hazine to a large extent by constructing illegal houses on Treasury veya özel araziler üzerine yasadışı konutlar inşa ederek karşı- or private land within the city limits. However, there are also lamaya itmiştir. Bununla birlikte yasal olarak yapılmasına engel housing projects that cannot be completed or inspected due bulunmayan fakat çeşitli sebeplerden dolayı tamamlanamayan to various reasons. Despite some precautionary measures, the veya kontrolden geçemeyen konut projeleri de bulunmakta- number of illegal settlements and slums in our city grew rap- dır. Alınan tedbirlere rağmen kentlerimizdeki kaçak yapılaşma idly. Local government responsibility for the management of ve gecekondu üretimi olanca hızıyla devam etmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis on Deforestation and Environmental Law in Sri Lanka
    Analysis on Deforestation and Environmental Law in Sri Lanka CV Liyanawatte1# and KLAG Dias 1Faculty of Law, General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Ratmalana, Sri Lanka #For correspondence; <[email protected]> Abstract-Ever since human starts to walk in the earth underestimated. Forest provide habitants for millions they had a close relationship with the forest and their of species and has a close relationship with water cycle, daily essentials were provided by the forest. But due to soil, climate etc. Even though the importance of forests the expansion of civilization, forest lands were is immense, forest are being destroyed due to the destroyed for agricultural purposes, development expansion of civilization and agriculture etc. This kind projects and for timber. Gradually human distant of removal of trees in large scale is called themselves from forests due the technological “deforestation”. Causes for deforestation are varying development they achieved and pay less attention to from country to country over time to time in response the protection of forests. Therefore deforestation rate to cultural social and economic conditions. increased. As an island nation and a biologically hot Deforestation differs from the Forest degradation as in spot, Sri Lanka had to face the environmental issue, forest degradation it gradually reduces the biomass “deforestation”. From the beginning of this nation which is a change with in the forest. there were rules and regulations relating to the protection of forests. Though there are laws relating to Sri Lanka is an island and one of the Bio Diversity hot environmental protection somehow deforestation has spot, according to the International Union for become a major environmental issue in the country Conservation of Nature1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Active and Most Dangerous Landslides in Bulgaria Are 721. That
    The active and most dangerous landslides in Bulgaria are 721. That is 40% of all recorded landslides, according to the geo-protection companies - Pernik, Varna and Pleven which monitor and keep a record of landslide areas. At the end of 2014 a total of 1786 landslides were registered in Bulgaria. Of those, 668 have been temporarily stabilized and 397 have subsided. Map of the landslides – geo-protection company Pernik. Map of the landslides – geo-protection company Varna. Map of the landslides – geo-protection company Pleven. Of all the 1786 landslides, 1132 are located in the settlements. 654 are distributed among the republican and municipal roads and partly in agricultural and forest areas. Newly active landslides last year were 51. Bulgaria’s geological, geomorphological and climate conditions pose a risk of landslides. All of the more than 1,700 landslides in the settlements are evenly distributed - a greater concentration of landslides is found along the Danube and the Black Sea coast, in mountain areas and in some of the valleys. Landslides are widely though unevenly distributed throughout the country. The causes for their occurrence can be divided into two main groups: natural and technogenic. Typically they operate simultaneously on several factors whose distinction is difficult (geological structure, intensity of rainfall, sea abrasion and storm events, failures in water supply and sewerage networks, improper drainage runoff, illegal construction, etc.). This is why it is very difficult to predict which landslides will get activated or where the new ones will occur in case of an unfavorable combination of several factors. It is important to note that each of them could be activated at any time in case of a combination of the above - mentioned factors or even one of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Illegal Construction in Jerusalem: a Variation on an Alarming Global Phenomenon
    Illegal Construction in Jerusalem: A Variation on an Alarming Global Phenomenon Executive Summary Impediments to Providing Quality Public Services in Jerusalem’s Arab Neighborhoods / Claims that Jerusalem is Being ‘Judaized’ / Israeli Planning Law / Identified Causes for Illegal Building in Jerusalem’s Arab Neighborhoods / Extensive Palestinian Authority Subsidies for Widespread Illegal Building / Illicit Profit: The Role of Criminal Elements in Illegal Building / The Controversy over Building Permits / The City has Authorized Plans (Exceeding the Demands of Faisal Husseini and Sari Nusseibeh) that Meet the Housing Needs of the Arabs Until the Year 2020 / The Controversy over Administrative Demolitions / The Controversy over ‘Treaties’ / Long-term Consequences of Illegal Building / The Global Epidemic of Illegal Building and Demolitions / Conclusions The struggle for sovereignty in Jerusalem remains among the most contentious of the many disputes that exacerbate the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Interwoven with this struggle are issues relating to Israel‟s use of urban planning, particularly as it affects the Arab residents of Jerusalem. Palestinian and other critics of the municipality insist, alta voce, that the application and enforcement of the Israeli Planning and Building Law (1965), as amended, places Arab residents of the city in an impossible situation. This accusation asserts that they are denied the opportunity to participate in the decision-making process by which their neighborhoods are planned. It follows, so it is claimed, that the Israeli urban planners exploit the law to the detriment of the Arab residents, by systematically rejecting their applications for building permits. According to the narrative, they have no choice but to build illegally, and, as a consequence, they run the risk of being snared by the Municipal inspectors.
    [Show full text]
  • They Protect the Forests. Who Protects Them?
    They Protect the Forests. Who Protects Them? THE INTERSECTION OF CONSERVATION, DEVELOPMENT, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF FOREST DEFENDERS Lessons from Kenya, Peru and Sri Lanka International Human Rights Clinic Report May 2017 International Law and Organizations Program May 2017 Dedication We dedicate this report to all individuals and collectives who put themselves at great risk to protect the world’s forests and the natural resources within them. We hope that their concerns regarding forest protection will be respectfully Tiffany Basciano heard and that they are provided the space to safely voice their opinions. As such, we call on governments, non- M.Caitlin Erskine State actors, and international institutions to respect the rights of all environmental human rights defenders. Sara L.M. Golden Furthermore, we wish to dedicate this report to those who have been killed for protecting the environment. The Goldman Environmental Prize was established to honor individuals who defend and protect their land and the Kady R. Hammer natural environment at great personal risk. We dedicate this report to Isidro Baldenegro López, second winner of the Goldman Award and indigenous activist, who was killed this year. Throughout his life, he continuously Fabio Iannuzzelli protected ancient forests through nonviolent campaigns and his legacy serves as a reminder of the immense Sarah Sebbar dangers these individuals face to protect their land. We further dedicate this report to Berta Cáceres, who was murdered in 2016, and never stopped her fight to protect her community despite ceaseless threats and intimidation. Rucheta Singh Natalie K. Thomure Anne Tousignant Miller Anahita Vasudevan Madison Wilcox This report is a project of the International Human Rights Clinic, an experiential learning course in the International Law and Organizations Program at Johns Hopkins University – The Paul H.
    [Show full text]
  • Deforestation: Constructing Problems and Solutions on Sierra Leone's Freetown Peninsula
    Deforestation: constructing problems and solutions on Sierra Leone's Freetown Peninsula Paul G. Munro1 Modelo University, Mexico 1. Introduction: political ecology, deforestation and West Africa Perched on the northern edge of a mountainous forest peninsula, Freetown, the capital of Sierra Leone, is the only place in West Africa where forest-covered mountains meet the sea. From a distance it is an impressive sight, with the urban metropolis largely overshadowed by the backdrop of forested mountains. Yet, beyond this visual spectacle, a complicated relationship between Freetown and its surroundings persists. The pressures of the rapidly expanding city are taking an increasing toll on the forest expanse, with the fringes of the city rapidly pushing up into the mountains of the forested peninsula (Figure 1). Such an expansion is met with trepidation, as the forested area provides vital functions for the city, such as a catchment for water reserves and as a protector against natural hazards including landslides and flooding. Urban expansion is widely acknowledged as an issue by government officials and environmental groups, yet action to address these issues is lacking. The gap between the rhetoric surrounding the problems and the projects being implemented to address them is the subject of this paper. It will be argued that this gap can be understood by examining how different actors in Freetown involved in policy and projects interact over the issue of deforestation, and how this produces discourses of blame towards poorer, politically weaker groups, resulting in solutions that intervene in their lives. The prescription of blame and solutions for deforestation on the Freetown Peninsula is negotiated through a combination of local realities, which includes the occurrence of deforestation, and global influences such as international development discourses and interventions.
    [Show full text]