Gender Recognition Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in the Commonwealth
Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites Human Rights, Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in The Commonwealth: Struggles for Decriminalisation and Change Edited by Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites © Human Rights Consortium, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NCND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN 978-1-912250-13-4 (2018 PDF edition) DOI 10.14296/518.9781912250134 Institute of Commonwealth Studies School of Advanced Study University of London Senate House Malet Street London WC1E 7HU Cover image: Activists at Pride in Entebbe, Uganda, August 2012. Photo © D. David Robinson 2013. Photo originally published in The Advocate (8 August 2012) with approval of Sexual Minorities Uganda (SMUG) and Freedom and Roam Uganda (FARUG). Approval renewed here from SMUG and FARUG, and PRIDE founder Kasha Jacqueline Nabagesera. Published with direct informed consent of the main pictured activist. Contents Abbreviations vii Contributors xi 1 Human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity in the Commonwealth: from history and law to developing activism and transnational dialogues 1 Corinne Lennox and Matthew Waites 2 -
Queer Families: Support and Advice for LGBTQ Families
Queer Families Support and Advice for LGBTQ families Introduction LGBTQ families are everywhere, in all different forms. While some progress has been made for LGBTQ people in Scotland, we know that there are still areas where we are overlooked, ignored or discriminated against. As one of our community members said ‘having an LGBTQ family is a wonderful thing, it’s just made more difficult than it needs to be.’ Scotland has made positive steps in recent years - it will be the first country to have LGBTQ History on the curriculum in schools, and the NHS’ Gender Friendly Nursery initiative was introduced in 2018 to actively work against gender stereotypes for young children. We started the Queer Families group in Glasgow in 2018 after realising there was a gap for LGBTQ families who wanted to socialise and have friendships with other LGBTQ people, in a child- friendly space. Some felt they had lost their connection to their LGBTQ community as they couldn’t attend the same events and groups that they had been part of before they had children. But at the same time, they found that the ‘mum and baby’ groups that were available were not always LGBTQ friendly, and that even if they were, they were often the only LGBTQ family there. Queer Families was set up to establish a supportive social space for LGBTQ families, where no-one was ‘the odd one out’ and people could share their stories, experiences and meet other LGBTQ parents and children. We want to celebrate LGBTQ families in all their diversity. This booklet will provide advice from parents, their experiences, stories and what they wish they had known. -
Homophobia in Sport
DEBATE PACK Number CDP-2016-0230, 29 November 2016 By John Woodhouse Homophobia in sport Contents Westminster Hall Debate 1. Introduction 2 2. Media 5 2.1 Articles and blogs 5 30 November 2016 at 1630hrs 2.2 Press releases 6 A Westminster Hall debate on the subject of homophobia in sport has been 3. Parliamentary scheduled for 1630hrs on Wednesday 30 November 2016. The Member in Business 7 charge of this debate is Stuart Andrew MP. 3.1 Culture, Media and Sport Committee 7 3.2 Parliamentary Questions 7 4. Organisations and further reading 10 The House of Commons Library prepares a briefing in hard copy and/or online for most non-legislative debates in the Chamber and Westminster Hall other than half-hour debates. Debate Packs are produced quickly after the announcement of parliamentary business. They are intended to provide a summary or overview of the issue being debated and identify relevant briefings and useful documents, including press and parliamentary material. More detailed briefing can be prepared for Members on request to the Library. www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Number CDP-2016-0230, 29 November 2016 1. Introduction What’s the problem? A 2016 report by Pride Sports, commissioned by Sport England1, found that “significant barriers to participation continue to exist for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people in sport”.2 The Culture, Media and Sport Committee is currently looking at homophobia in sport. In its background to the inquiry, the Committee notes that an earlier report on racism in football3 found that homophobia was “emerging as a bigger problem than other forms of discrimination”.4 The Committee also observes that: (…) It is notable that there are currently no openly gay footballers in Scotland and England’s professional divisions and homophobic abuse remains commonplace at matches and online. -
Trans, Non-Binary and Intersex Equality: Policy and Guidance
Trans, Non-Binary and Intersex Equality: Policy and Guidance Owner: Director of Human Resources Reviewed by: UR Pride Equality Network Equality Diversity and Inclusion Group Equality Diversity and Inclusion Committee Approved by: Council (26 November 2018) Senate (endorsed, 21 November 2018) Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Committee (endorsed, 08 November 2018) Review due date: September 2021 Update history: Committee Name(s) (Date(s)) Related policies This Policy and guidance should be read in conjunction with: Equality and Diversity Policy Dignity and Respect Policy and Procedures Data Protection Policy and Procedures Student Contract, Regulations Policies and Procedures Human Resources Guidance, Policies and Procedures Noted that this is list is not exhaustive 1 of 36 Contents Page Scope ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Equality, Diversity and Inclusion ............................................................................................................. 3 1. Policy Statement ............................................................................................................................. 4 2. Definitions ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... -
A Critique of the Model of Gender Recognition and the Limits of Self‑Declaration for Non‑Binary Trans Individuals
Law and Critique https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09286-y A Critique of the Model of Gender Recognition and the Limits of Self‑Declaration for Non‑Binary Trans Individuals Caterina Nirta1 Accepted: 30 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2021 Abstract This article considers the model of recognition in the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA) and, through a critique of the value of stability pursued through this legislation, argues that recognition as a model is incompatible with the variety of experiences of non-binary trans-identifed individuals. The article then moves on to analyse self-declaration, part of the proposed reform recently dismissed by the Government. While self-declaration contains provisions that would minimise the length of the process of recognition as well as the level of intrusiveness and stigma associated with it, this analysis highlights some fundamental theoretical concerns with its over-reliance on the strict dialectical logics on recognition and its structural inability to account for and respond to the challenges posed by non-binary trans individuals. Keywords Feminism · Gender recognition · Self-declaration · Transgender Introduction This paper ofers a theoretical critique of the model of recognition within the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) 2004. Despite plans to reform the GRA 2004 in England, Scotland and Wales which were ofcially abandoned by the Government in Septem- ber 2020, this paper seeks to critically reconsider the system of self-declaration taken into consideration in the dismissed proposal and, through a critique of the ideal of sta- bility pursed by this legislation, map out a temporality that is incompatible with the lived experiences of many non-binary trans-identifed individuals. -
Intimate Migrations
FINAL PROJECT REPORT December 2016 FRANCESCA STELLA, ANNA GAWLEWICZ, MOYA FLYNN Intimate Migrations CONTENTS Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Migrants in Scotland Executive summary 4 1 Background to the study 6 2 Methodology and participants’ demographic profi le 8 3 Migration to Scotland 12 3.1 Factors facilitating migration 12 3.2 Reasons for migrating 12 4 Migrant experiences in Scotland 16 A report by Francesca Stella, Anna Gawlewicz and Moya Flynn, December 2016 4.1 Experiences of employment and education 16 4.1.1 Experiences of work in Scotland 16 Intimate Migrations is a project about the experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual 4.1.2 Experiences of education in Scotland 17 and transgender migrants from Central Eastern Europe (CEE) and the Former Soviet 4.2 Security and wellbeing 19 Union (FSU) in Scotland. It is funded by the Economic Social Research Council and 4.2.1 Material and emotional security 19 hosted by the University of Glasgow. For more information about the Intimate Migrations project see www.intimatemigrations.net 4.2.2 Wellbeing and LGBT equality 21 4.2.3 Challenges and insecurities 23 The report recommendations and an additional section of the report will be available as separate documents on 4.2.4 Plans for the future and reasons for staying in Scotland 24 the project website in early 2017. The complete version of the report, inclusive of the recommendations and the 4.3. Prejudice and discrimination 26 additional section, will also be available on the project website in 2017. 4.3.1 Sexual orientation and gender -
18Th July 2014 University of Glasgow, Sir Charles Wilson Building
18th July 2014 University of Glasgow, Sir Charles Wilson Building Glasgow Human Rights Network #LGBTIhrc CONFERENCE WELCOME On behalf of the conference partners – The Equality Network, Glasgow Human Rights Network, Kaleidoscope Trust and Pride Glasgow – and the conference steering group, we welcome you to the LGBTI Human Rights in the Commonwealth Conference here in Glasgow. Just five days before the start of the Commonwealth Games in the city, and with the eyes of the Commonwealth and the world upon us, this conference aims to create a focus for LGBTI human rights discussions, providing a space to share ideas, practice and campaigns, engaging participants in global human rights issues and, importantly, ensuring the visibility of Commonwealth LGBTI people and culture during the games. The human rights record of the Commonwealth is not one to celebrate. When 42 of the 53 members of the Commonwealth criminalise their own LGBTI citizens and many people do not know about the role of the Commonwealth or what it does, the conference offers a unique opportunity to raise and highlight LGBTI human rights successes and challenges, seeking ways to work together to help make Commonwealth a better place for all, and exploring ways in which people and communities can be a part of wider campaigns for equality and human rights. We are delighted to be joined by speakers from around the Commonwealth, here to share their insights, expertise and knowledge on the Commonwealth, international human rights, sexual orientation, gender identity and intersex equality. We hope this conference will be engaging and that you will leave today better informed about the struggles, successes and challenges that LGBTI people face around the Commonwealth and what you can do to better support LGBTI equality around the world. -
Les Destinées De L'illyricum Méridional Pendant Le Haut Moyen Âge
JOBNAME: No Job Name PAGE: 1 SESS: 12 OUTPUT: Thu May 26 16:08:52 2011 SUM: 6023F8EF /v2451/blackwell/journals/emed_v19_i3/05emed_324 1 Book reviewsemed_324 354..376 2 3 Les destinées de l’Illyricum méridional pendant le haut Moyen Âge. 4 Mélanges de l’École Française de Rome, Moyen Âge 120–2. Rome: 5 l’École Française de Rome. 2009. 238 pp. + 50 b/w and 101 color figures. 6 EUR 55. ISBN 978 2 7283 0870 5; ISSN 0223 9883. 7 8 This is the proceedings of a conference jointly organized by École 9 française de Rome, Centre d’Histoire et Civilisation de Byzance, and 10 the Albanian Institute of Archaeology in Lezha (Albania) in 2008.In 11 the introduction, Etleva Nallbani explains its main objective as throw- 12 ing new light on developments in the Western Balkans during the early 13 Middle Ages, primarily on the basis of archaeological research con- 14 ducted in the past two decades. The present volume witnesses not only 15 the technological advances in archaeology, which can be seen at work in 16 a number of contributions, but it also bears the mark of a renewed 17 interest in rural settlements and the relative departure from political 18 history in favour of detailed analyses of production, distribution, and 19 exchange routes. 20 Rather than summarize the wealth of insights in a short space, I will 21 focus on two major themes addressed by this volume: urban and rural life 22 in Illyricum and patterns of production and distribution. Pascale Cheva- 23 lier and Jagoda Mardešic´ contribute an insightful piece on urban life at 24 Salona during the sixth–seventh centuries based on the recent excavations 25 conducted in the episcopal complex of the town. -
Moving Through the World As a Woman.Pdf
This is a repository copy of Moving Through the World as a Woman. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/137409/ Version: Accepted Version Book Section: Pearce, R orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-303X (2019) Moving Through the World as a Woman. In: Crimmins, G, (ed.) Strategies for Resisting Sexism in the Academy: Higher Education, Gender and Intersectionality. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education . Palgrave Macmillan , pp. 17-34. ISBN 978-3-030-04851-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04852-5 (c) The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2019. This is an author produced version of a book chapter from Strategies for Resisting Sexism in the Academy. Uploaded in accordance with palgrave macmillan self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Moving through the world as a woman to delimit the purview of inquiry. -
Marriage: a Meaningful Relationship? In: Eekelaar, J. (Ed.) Family Law in Britain and America in the New Century
Mair, J. (2016) Marriage: a meaningful relationship? In: Eekelaar, J. (ed.) Family Law in Britain and America in the New Century. Brill Nijhoff. ISBN 9789004304918. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/120966/ Deposited on: 02 September 2016 Enlighten – Research publications by members of the University of Glasgow http://eprints.gla.ac.uk Marriage: a meaningful relationship? For family lawyers with an interest in marriage, the latter decades of the 20th Century were lean times. Marriage was a settled subject. From the 19th Century Married Women’s Property Acts through to no-fault divorce and financial provision in the 1970s and 80s, a century of legal reform had groomed a somewhat aged model and made it suitably modern for contemporary family law.1 Nagging doubts remained about declining social relevance, accompanied by growing interest in alternative relationships, but these were concerns which tended to divert our gaze away from marriage itself and towards the other, newer possibilities: cohabitation, civil union, Pacs, 2 mother/child dyad, 3 friendship. 4 Marriage itself attracted relatively little attention. Then into that quiet and settled landscape, there blew “a perfect storm.”5 At the centre of the storm was same sex marriage but, caught up along with it, were calls and concerns from every perspective: conservative, liberal, religious, secular, feminist, functional, expressive. 6 Far from being calm, settled and slightly overlooked, marriage has become fiercely contested and deeply controversial. Marriage is now at the centre of a struggle between conservatives and liberals, those who wish to preserve and those who wish to reform but, no matter the particular perspective or 1 For an overview of this period of modernisation throughout Europe, see M Antokolskaia, Harmonisation of Family Law in Europe: A Historical Perspective, 2006, Intersentia, chapter 13. -
Gender Recognition: Where Next?
GENDER RECOGNITION: WHERE NEXT? Introduction “The fact that only a few thousand people have received a GRC after ten years, and that that number is comparable to the number of people in total currently on NHS GIC waiting lists, is a big sign that something is very wrong with the GRA.” This report summarises the findings of a survey undertaken during November and December 2015 in collaboration with the Non-Binary Inclusion Project. The survey, entitled ‘Replace the GRC – but how?’ was created in response to calls for reform of the Gender Recognition Act 2004, in the wake of a Transgender Equality Inquiry conducted by the UK Parliament’s Women and Equalities Committee. The survey consisted of four questions, and a comment box for additional suggestions. All questions were open-ended, with respondents encouraged to answer as they saw fit. This report unpacks a number of key themes identified from responses to the survey. These findings do not necessarily reflect a consistent viewpoint, nor the views of UK Trans Info. However, we anticipate that they will be of use in considering possible approaches to the revision or replacement of the Gender Recognition Act (GRA) and Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). Findings Burdens of the existing system “The idea that I will have to wait 2 years, pay at least £150, gather evidence, and then submit an application to a panel of people (usually clinicians, possibly not even with lived experience of being trans) who will never meet me yet have the power to decide whether I suitably fit their idea of gender, is humiliating, exhausting and exceedingly unfair.” The application process The majority of respondents noted multiple problems contained within, or resulting from, the current gender recognition system. -
Transgender Workplace Support Guide
Transgender Workplace Support Guide This guide is a product of the Transgender Workplace Support Project that was delivered in partnership by NHS Lothian Health Promotion Service and LGBT Health and Wellbeing. This first version was published in June 2016 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................... 5 10 Top Tips for Transgender Employees ............................................ 6 10 Top Tips for Employers ................................................................... 7 10 Top Tips for Human Resources ...................................................... 8 Thinking about Gender ......................................................................... 9 What is gender? .................................................................................................... 9 Transitioning ....................................................................................................... 10 Transsexual People ............................................................................................ 11 Non-binary People .............................................................................................. 11 Legislation ........................................................................................... 12 Equality Act 2010 ................................................................................................ 12 Public Sector Equality Duty .....................................................................................................