DOCSLIB.ORG

China's Ivory Market After the Ivory Trade Ban in 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
China's Ivory Market After the Ivory Trade Ban in 2018 TRAFFIC CHINA’S IVORY MARKET AFTER BRIEFING THE IVORY TRADE BAN IN 2018 SEPTEMBER 2018 Yu Xiao KEY points: • In 2018, TRAFFIC visited 71 shops previously licensed to sell I. INTRODUCTION ivory which had been closed in the second batch of China’s ivory trade ban and confirmed that all China is reputed to be one of the world’s largest markets for illegal ivory trade. Since shops surveyed have either closed for business or, in the case of 2002, ETIS (Elephant Trade Information System) reports to CITES have consistently 69% of shops that have remained identified China as the leading destination for ivory globally (Milliken, 2016). In open, staff from these shops are proactively communicating the September 2016, An Act to Save African Elephants - A Ban on Commercial Ivory Trade ivory trade ban policy to customers. in China - A Feasibility Study Briefing, released by WWF and TRAFFIC, called on • In 2018, TRAFFIC visited 157 markets in 23 cities and found the Chinese Government to ban ivory trade in order to reduce the threats to African 2,812 ivory products in 345 Elephants effectively. This bold action was designed to enable China to play a more unauthorised shops. Compared to a similar survey conducted in active role in global wildlife conservation and to have a positive influence in compelling 2017, the number of stores with other countries and regions to strengthen their actions in cracking down on illegal trade ivory decreased by 30%, but the number of ivory products displayed in wild animals and plants overall (Xu et al., 2016). increased by 22%. Among the cities surveyed, the number of ivory products displayed in three second- On 30th December, 2016, the Circular on Phasing out the Commercial Processing and tier cities—Chengdu, Chongqing, and Hangzhou—and two third-tier Sales of Ivory and Ivory Products was issued by the State Council, requesting “the first cities—Dongxing and Pingxiang— batch of accredited ivory manufacturers and retail stores to cease processing and selling exceeded half of the number in all cities (56%), while the illegal trade ivory and ivory products before 31st March 2017, while the remaining group of ivory of ivory in other cities fell by 19%. manufacturers and stores were required to shut down their ivory selling operations • 24% of the ivory products recorded were pre-Convention ivory, which before 31st December, 2017” (General Office of the State Council, 2016). means they were manufactured before 1989. To assess the impact of this policy to ban commercial ivory trade in China and shut • 94% of ivory products detected in the physical market were decorative down the first batch of accredited ivory retail stores before 31st March 2017, WWF accessories, reflecting the fact that and TRAFFIC conducted a market survey during April and May 2017. The report was buyers are likely to be newcomers to traditional Chinese handicrafts published in August 2017 under the title: Revisiting China’s Ivory Market in 2017. It was or random buyers, rather than consumers intent on making found that all of the first batch of accredited retail stores had ceased to offer ivory for ivory purchases for investment or sale; the remaining retail stores were selling ivory products at a discount. Of these latter collection. stores, 35% were found to be violating various regulations on ivory trade. Overall, the • Compared to the first six months of 2017, the price of ivory bracelets numbers of products and their prices when being sold illegally in both physical and in 2018 decreased 9% in China online markets were in decline (Zhao et al., 2017). and the price of raw ivory declined 17–38% at the end of 2017. • Since the change of policy, the To understand the status of ivory trade in China after the full implementation of China’s availability of ivory through the ivory trade ban, TRAFFIC conducted another large-scale market survey beginning in internet has declined. The average monthly number of new ivory January 2018. The objectives were to check if all legal ivory retail stores had ceased advertisements (ads) in 2017 (after the announcement of the ivory to offer ivory, and to investigate the impacts of the 2017 policy change on ivory trade trade ban policy) was 274, 61% in physical markets across the country. In addition, TRAFFIC conducted statistical lower than in 2016 (before the announcement), while the average analysis on a survey of online ivory trade in the period January 2017 to June 2018 in monthly numbers of new ivory ads in 2018 (after the implementation order to understand the impact of the ivory trade ban policy on trade online. of the ban) were 27% fewer than in 2017. • Between July and December 2017, 40 social media accounts monitored by TRAFFIC posted an average of 113 ivory ads and 738 pictures/ videos per day. Between January and June 2018, an average of 101 ivory ads and 701 pictures/videos were posted by the same accounts, TRAFFIC BRIEFING PAPER representing decreases of 11% and 5% respectively from the previous six months. 1 II. METHODOLOGY 1. Revisiting legal ivory market outlets Since the first batch of 60 accredited ivory stores ceased to offer ivory before the end of March 2017, TRAFFIC visited 50 (or 83%) of these stores, from April to May 2017. From January to July 2018, TRAFFIC visited 71 (or 81%) out of the remaining 88 stores which had stopped their sales of ivory before 31st December 2017. The intentions for the survey were to confirm if these stores have removed the display notice of their Licence as “Accredited retail stores of ivory products” issued by the State; whether the stores have ceased selling ivory products; and to collect feedback from shop assistants on the status of the ivory trade ban policy. 2. Survey of illegal ivory markets 1) Physical markets TRAFFIC has been conducting market surveys on illegal ivory trade in China since 2007. Various details about illegal ivory trade have been recorded during these surveys, including, names and addresses of the markets and shops visited in each city, and the number and type of ivory products, prices and weight of the items observed, as well as additional information on sources and the origins of products, if possible, via in-depth conversations with traders. No purchase of ivory or other illegal wildlife products was ever made during these surveys. Between January and July 2018, TRAFFIC conducted surveys of ivory trade in 23 major cities across China, which were then divided into first-tier (mega) cities, second-tier cities and third-tier cities according to the criteria of TRAFFIC's 2017 report (Zhao et al., 2017). The detailed list of cities is shown in Table 1: Table 1. List of cities visited for the physical market survey in 2018 First-tier cities (5) Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Tianjin, Shenzhen Hangzhou, Nanjing, Harbin, Xi’an, Zhengzhou, Chengdu, Chongqing, Kunming, Xiamen, Second-tier cities (15) Fuzhou, Nanning, Dalian, Shenyang, Shijiazhuang, Tangshan Third-tier cities (3) Xianyou(Putian), Dongxing, Pingxiang TRAFFIC made a few changes to the list of target cities for the 2018 market surveys compared with the 2017 survey. Of the first-tier cities, Shenzhen was added as a target city for market surveys, but all other cities were also part of TRAFFIC’s ivory consumer research in 2017. Of the second-tier cities, Suzhou, Changzhou and Taiyuan (surveyed in 2017) were not visited in 2018, while Shenyang, Shijiazhuang, Dalian and Tangshan were added to the 2018 survey. Of the third-tier cities, three cities at the prefectural level (Pu’er, Yuxi and Xishuangbanna) were removed and replaced with Dongxing and Pingxiang, two cities at county level (i.e. lower in the urban classification hierarchy in China). These smaller cities are particularly significant as the largest entry and exit ports between China and Viet Nam and could be major channels for transboundary smuggling of ivory and other wildlife products (Liu, 2015; Vigne and Martin, 2016). Therefore, they were also included as target cities for the current market survey. The types of market surveyed varied depending on the city. For example, TRAFFIC mainly visited the art and antiques collection markets, flower and bird markets and cultural products markets in first-tier cities; in Guangzhou, the jewellery markets were also visited. In the second and third-tier cities with a thriving tourism industry, tourism souvenir shops and specialty markets were also visited. With respect to the third-tier cities, which generally have no art and antiques collection market, border trade markets, wholesale markets, souvenir and specialty markets (e.g. rosewood handicrafts), were visited. TRAFFIC BRIEFING PAPER 2 The survey also explored the supply connectivity between China’s market availability and Viet Nam, previously noted to be a major source of illegal ivory in China (Liu, 2015; Vigne and Martin, 2016). In December 2017 and June 2018, researchers visited the cities of Mong Cai, Ha Long as well as Nhi Khe village (near Hanoi) in Viet Nam to understand better the ivory trade relationship between Viet Nam and the Chinese market. Findings of the market surveys by TRAFFIC have been shared with the competent law enforcement agencies in a timely manner prior to publication of this report. 2) Website platforms It needs to be appreciated that all ivory trade online is illegal in China, regardless of whether such transactions conducted before or after the ivory trade ban (which applied to authorised shops, the only outlets where ivory could previously be sold legally). In 2017 and 2018, TRAFFIC continued to monitor the trade of ivory and wildlife products from eight other endangered species (i.e. rhinoceroses, tigers, marine turtles, pangolins, Saiga Antelope, Helmeted Hornbill, leopards, and whales) on 31 website platforms, following survey methods described in Xiao and Wang (2015).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Organized Crime and the Illicit Wildlife Trade in Mexico
    ORGANIZED CRIME AND THE ILLICIT WILDLIFE TRADE IN MEXICO Taylor P. Barth Master of Global Affairs, Rice University May 2017 © 2017 by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Taylor P. Barth “Organized Crime and the Illicit Wildlife Trade in Mexico” Organized Crime and the Illicit Wildlife Trade in Mexico Introduction “Their [the cartels’] branching out mimics the behavior of legitimate companies. Firms looking to grow, and especially those with surplus cash to invest (always a problem for criminal organizations, for whom banking is tricky), strike out into new markets where they believe their existing expertise could give them a head start.”1 In 2013, President Barack Obama signed an executive order on combating wildlife trafficking. This brought a criminal activity of enormous consequence for international and environmental security into the spotlight, adding a sense of urgency to a problem that until then had been left largely to the efforts of conservation specialists and international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Indeed, the trafficking of exotic and endangered animals and products derived from them is a crime only on par with the illegal trade in drugs, people, and weapons in terms of scale and impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Investigations Into Wildlife Crime
    FINANCIAL INVESTIGATIONS INTO WILDLIFE CRIME Produced by the ECOFEL The Egmont Group (EG) is a global organization of Financial Intelligence Units (FIUs). The Egmont Group Secretariat (EGS) is based in Canada and provides strategic, administrative, and other support to the overall activities of the Egmont Group, the Egmont Committee, the Working Groups as well as the Regional Groups. The Egmont Centre of FIU Excellence and Leadership (ECOFEL), active since April 2018, is an operational arm of the EG and is fully integrated into the EGS in Canada. The ECOFEL is mandated to develop and deliver capacity building and technical assistance projects and programs related to the development and enhancement of FIU capabilities, excellence and leadership. ECOFEL IS FUNDED THROUGH THE FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS OF UKAID AND SWISS CONFEDERATION This publication is subject to copyright. No part of this publication may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission and consent from the Egmont Group Secretariat. Request for permission to reproduce all or part of this publication should be made to: THE EGMONT GROUP SECRETARIAT Tel: +1-416-355-5670 Fax: +1-416-929-0619 E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2020 by the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units ECOFEL 1 Table of Contents List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coverage of Wildlife Crimes in Indian Newspapers – an Interdisciplinary
    Running head: WILDLIFE CRIME IN INDIAN NEWSPAPERS 1 Coverage of Wildlife Crimes in Indian Newspapers – An Interdisciplinary Conservation Criminology Approach to Journalism Studies WILDLIFE CRIME IN INDIAN NEWSPAPERS 2 Abstract The causes and impacts of wildlife crimes – the fourth largest criminal enterprise – transcend spatial, temporal and disciplinary boundaries, deeming it a wicked problem, manageable only through interdisciplinary strategies. This exploratory quantitative content analysis examines how India’s leading English-language newspapers cover wildlife crime. Rarely studied from a communication perspective, wildlife crime-related and environmental journalism research in India is limited. The three-pronged, interdisciplinary conservation criminology framework is applied to this novel study of wildlife crime media coverage. Keywords: India, content analysis, wildlife crime, interdisciplinary research WILDLIFE CRIME IN INDIAN NEWSPAPERS 3 Coverage of Wildlife Crimes in Indian Newspapers – An Interdisciplinary Conservation Criminology Approach to Journalism Studies Introduction Wildlife crime and the illegal trade in wildlife, its parts, derivatives, and products is a global, cross-border criminal enterprise that is extremely profitable and known to converge with other forms of serious, at times violent, crimes including the trafficking of drugs, weapons and humans (UNODC, 2016). Estimated to be worth between $20 billion to $30 billion annually, wildlife crimes are increasingly being described as threats to not only ecological sustainability – as they contribute to accelerating species extinction – but also as threats to political, social and cultural security, and public health (Greenfield & Veríssimo, 2019; O'Donoghue, Rutz, & Thompson, 2016; Pires & Moreto, 2011). Contemporary interventions against wildlife crimes, that often involve organized criminal syndicates with access to enviable resources, include militarized responses for protecting habitats and species which can have serious, unanticipated consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Smuggling
    OCTOBER 2010 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 10 PAGES 235-262 WWW.GLOBALRESEARCHER.COM Wildlife Smuggling CAN DISAPPEARING SPECIES BE SAVED FROM POACHERS? raffickers are slaughtering some of the world’s most beloved endangered or threatened animals for their body parts — including elephant tusks, tiger penises and bear gall bladders — to supply the booming black market in souvenirs, trophies and traditional Chinese medicine. Other animals are shot by African T hunters to meet the burgeoning demand for “bushmeat,” both to feed the hungry in refugee camps and to satisfy the tastes of city dwellers. Thousands of other animals, including exotic birds and rare monkeys, are trapped to meet the growing demand for exotic pets. Using satellite phones, helicopters and the Internet, the in- creasingly sophisticated smugglers — often part of organized crime syndicates — generate up to $20 billion annually, making wildlife trafficking the world’s third-most-lucrative illegal trade. Experts suggest two controversial solutions: ban- ning all ivory trade and “farming” tigers and other exotic species to supply the seemingly insatiable demand for their body parts. While international conserva- tion treaties have slowed the carnage, ex- perts say tougher enforcement is needed before some of the Earth’s last wild crea- tures disappear forever. Officials examine the body of a rhinoceros killed by poachers in Kaziranga National Park in India’s northeastern Assam state on Feb. 24, 2010. Rhinos are killed for their horns, which some cultures believe have medicinal or magical properties. PUBLISHED BY CQ PRESS, A DIVISION OF SAGE WWW.CQPRESS.COM WILDLIFE SMUGGLING THE ISSUES SIDEBARS AND GRAPHICS • Is CITES an effective 238 Wildlife Smuggling Spans October 2010 237 tool to combat wildlife the Globe Volume 4, Number 10 trafficking? Trafficking occurs on every • Does animal farming re- continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Deadly Profits: Illegal Wildlife Trafficking Through Uganda And
    Cover: The carcass of an elephant killed by militarized poachers. Garamba National Park, DRC, April 2016. Photo: African Parks Deadly Profits Illegal Wildlife Trafficking through Uganda and South Sudan By Ledio Cakaj and Sasha Lezhnev July 2017 Executive Summary Countries that act as transit hubs for international wildlife trafficking are a critical, highly profitable part of the illegal wildlife smuggling supply chain, but are frequently overlooked. While considerable attention is paid to stopping illegal poaching at the chain’s origins in national parks and changing end-user demand (e.g., in China), countries that act as midpoints in the supply chain are critical to stopping global wildlife trafficking. They are needed way stations for traffickers who generate considerable profits, thereby driving the market for poaching. This is starting to change, as U.S., European, and some African policymakers increasingly recognize the problem, but more is needed to combat these key trafficking hubs. In East and Central Africa, South Sudan and Uganda act as critical waypoints for elephant tusks, pangolin scales, hippo teeth, and other wildlife, as field research done for this report reveals. Kenya and Tanzania are also key hubs but have received more attention. The wildlife going through Uganda and South Sudan is largely illegally poached at alarming rates from Garamba National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan, points in West Africa, and to a lesser extent Uganda, as it makes its way mainly to East Asia. Worryingly, the elephant
    [Show full text]
  • In Plane Sight
    The USAID Reducing Opportunities for Unlawful Transport of Endangered Species (ROUTES) Partnership brings together transport and logistics companies, government agencies, development groups, law enforcement, conservation organizations, academia and donors to disrupt wildlife trafficking activities, and forms a key element of the concerted international response to addressing wildlife poaching and associated criminal activities worldwide. At the heart of ROUTES is a core group of partners collaborating with the U.S. Government and the transport sector that includes the Center for Advanced Defense Studies (C4ADS), Freeland, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), TRAFFIC and WWF. For resources referenced in this document or for more information visit: www.routespartnership.org [email protected] @routespartners @routespartnership This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of C4ADS and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, or individual ROUTES partners. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of C4ADS, ROUTES, or ROUTES partners concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 2 ABOUT C4ADS ABOUT THE AUTHORS C4ADS (www.c4ads.org) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit Mary Utermohlen received degrees in International organization dedicated to data-driven analysis and Relations and Accounting from the College of William evidence-based reporting of conflict and security & Mary, with concentrations in Hispanic Studies and issues worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • How Will COVID-19 Impact Global Wildlife Trafficking?
    Special Analysis 1 April 2020 Serial: SA-010420 How will COVID-19 impact global wildlife trafficking? Dr Tim Wittig United for Wildlife Financial & Transport Taskforces, Head of Intelligence & Analysis This special analysis provides a predictive assessment of likely impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on illegal wildlife trade activities, associated risks to transport and finance companies, and possible futures in our response. Overall, we assess that there will be no widespread operational pause for wildlife traffickers, despite various specific adaptations brought about by the pandemic and its response. There will be some localised disruptions, but the pandemic will not significantly diminish illegal wildlife supply availability, smuggling modes, or demand patterns in the short to medium terms. On the contrary, it will very likely open up new opportunities for traffickers and poachers in certain areas. In the medium to long terms, however, wildlife traffickers will face unprecedented vulnerabilities due to macroeconomic and macro-political uncertainties. Whether or not wildlife traffickers will be able to successfully adapt to and thrive in these new conditions will depend primarily on how aggressively the global counter-wildlife trafficking community is able to target and exploit these vulnerabilities in a strategic and systematic way. CONTENTS Introduction Predictions 1. Poaching will increase in some key areas 8. Passenger air will cease being a major mode of 2. Wildlife traffickers will be vulnerable to smuggling for the duration of the pandemic macroeconomic swings 9. Traffickers will focus on proven smuggling routes 3. Illegal wildlife traders and wholesalers will shift to and modes online selling 10. Insider threat and corruption risks will 4.
    [Show full text]
  • WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING in BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira
    July 2020 WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL Sandra Charity and Juliana Machado Ferreira TRAFFIC: Wildlife Trade in Brazil WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING IN BRAZIL TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network, is a leading non-governmental organisation working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. © Jaime Rojo / WWF-US Reproduction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organisations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. TRAFFIC David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK. Tel: +44 (0)1223 277427 Email: [email protected] Suggested citation: Charity, S., Ferreira, J.M. (2020). Wildlife Trafficking in Brazil. TRAFFIC International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. © WWF-Brazil / Zig Koch © TRAFFIC 2020. Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. ISBN: 978-1-911646-23-5 UK Registered Charity No. 1076722 Design by: Hallie Sacks Cover photo: © Staffan Widstrand / WWF This report was made possible with support from the American people delivered through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S
    International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy Liana Sun Wyler Analyst in International Crime and Narcotics Pervaze A. Sheikh Specialist in Natural Resources Policy July 23, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL34395 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy Summary Global trade in illegal wildlife is a potentially vast illicit economy, estimated to be worth billions of dollars each year. Some of the most lucrative illicit wildlife commodities include elephant ivory, rhino horn, sturgeon caviar, and so-called “bushmeat.” Wildlife smuggling may pose a transnational security threat as well as an environmental one. Numerous sources indicate that some organized criminal syndicates, insurgent groups, and foreign military units may be involved in various aspects of international wildlife trafficking. Limited anecdotal evidence also indicates that some terrorist groups may be engaged in wildlife crimes, particularly poaching, for monetary gain. Some observers claim that the participation of such actors in wildlife trafficking can therefore threaten the stability of countries, foster corruption, and encourage violence to protect the trade. Reports of escalating exploitation of protected wildlife, coupled with the emerging prominence of highly organized and well-equipped illicit actors in wildlife trafficking, suggests that policy challenges persist. Commonly cited challenges include legal loopholes that allow poachers and traffickers to operate with impunity, gaps in foreign government capabilities to address smuggling problems, and persistent structural drivers such as lack of alternative livelihoods in source countries and consumer demand. To address the illicit trade in endangered wildlife, the international community has established, through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), a global policy framework to regulate and sometimes ban exports of selected species.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTER WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING DIGEST: SOUTHEAST ASIA and CHINA, 2020 Issue IV, May 2021
    Saman Ranasinghe USAID WILDLIFE ASIA COUNTER WILDLIFE TRAFFICKING DIGEST: SOUTHEAST ASIA AND CHINA, 2020 Issue IV, May 2021 This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). It was prepared by RTI International for the USAID Wildlife Asia Activity, AID-468-I-16-0001, TO AID-486-TO-16-0003. The contents of this study/report are the sole responsibility of RTI International and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States government. USAID WILDLIFE ASIA Counter Wildlife Trafficking Digest: Southeast Asia and China, 2020 Issue IV, May 2021 Contract Number: AID-468-I-16-00001, TO AID-486-To-16-00003 Activity Start and End Date: August 31, 2016 to August 30, 2021 COR Name: Craig Kirkpatrick Submitted by: Peter Collier, USAID Wildlife Asia Chief of Party 208 Wireless Road, Unit 406 Lumpini, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330 Thailand Cover Photo: African Elephant © Saman Ranasingh TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................... V BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... VII 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 COVID-19 ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sixty-Second Meeting of the CITES Standing Committee
    Original language: English SC65 Doc. 59.2 (Rev. 1) English only / únicamente en inglés / seulement en anglais CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Sixty-sixth meeting of the Standing Committee Geneva (Switzerland), 11-15 January 2016 Reports of regional representatives ASIA 1. This document has been submitted by Kuwait.* 2. General information: Regional Representative: Indonesia, Japan, Kuwait Alternate Regional Representative: China, Jordan, Saudi Arabia Number of Parties in the Region: 37 Parties providing information for this Report: Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, Iraq, Japan, Kuwait, Malaysia, Maldives, Myanmar, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam and United Arab Emirates, 3. Introduction: This report summarized the activities of Parties between 65th Standing Committee Meeting (July 2014, Geneva) and 66th Standing Committee Meeting (January 2016, Geneva). Japan represents Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Maldives, Mongolia, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Uzbekistan. Indonesia: Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, China, Leo people’s democratic republic, Myanmar, Philippines, Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam. Kuwait represents Bahrain, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syrian Arab Republic, United Arab Emirates and Yemen. 4. Activities within each party 4.1 Bangladesh 1. Participation in CITES meeting - Representatives of Bangladesh participated in CITES related meetings or workshops in Lion, Singapore and Bangkok organized by INTERPOL this year. 2. Cooperation with the parties and others * The geographical designations employed in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the CITES Secretariat (or the United Nations Environment Programme) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Community-Led Approaches to Tackling Illegal Wildlife Trade: Case Studies from Latin America
    Biodiversity IIED and IUCN-SULi Keywords: wildlife crime, illegal wildlife trade, community-based approaches, The scale of illegal wildlife trade (IWT) livelihoods, Latin America September 2019 internationally is a conservation crisis and tackling it is seen as a race against time. As a quarter of the world’s land is owned or managed by communities, they must be central to conservation efforts – and community engagement is already internationally recognised as important to the global effort to tackle IWT. But because community engagement strategies are complex and take time to implement, not enough initiatives are being supported. This compilation of case studies seeks to address this problem. Prepared to coincide with the regional conference on IWT in Peru in October 2019, it showcases a wide range of successful initiatives from Latin America that have engaged communities in tackling IWT in different ways. However, these need to be scaled up and scaled out, learning from experience and adapting approaches to fi t specifi c contexts and to meet specifi c challenges. Community-led International Institute for Environment and Development 80-86 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8NH, UK Tel: +44 (0)20 3463 7399 approaches to tackling Fax: +44 (0)20 3514 9055 email: [email protected] www.iied.org illegal wildlife trade Case studies from Latin America Funded by: The production of this compilation has been made possible with fi nancial support from the UK Government’s Illegal Wildlife Trade Challenge Fund, TRAFFIC and the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The views expressed do not necessarily represent those of the funders.
    [Show full text]