The Honorablerichardj. Durbin Chairman,Committeeon the Judiciary Unitedstatessenate 224 Dirksensenateoffice Building Washington,D.C.20510

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Honorablerichardj. Durbin Chairman,Committeeon the Judiciary Unitedstatessenate 224 Dirksensenateoffice Building Washington,D.C.20510 February 18, 2021 The HonorableRichardJ. Durbin Chairman,Committeeon the Judiciary UnitedStatesSenate 224 DirksenSenateOffice Building Washington,D.C.20510 The Honorable Charles E. Grassley Ranking Member, Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Chairman Durbin & Ranking Member Grassley: We, the undersigned, are more than 150 former United States Attorneys and other senior Department of Justice officials. Collectively, we have served in 46 states and the District of Columbia under both Democratic and Republican Administrations. We write in support of President Biden’s nomination of Judge Merrick B. Garland to serve as Attorney General of the United States and to express our strong belief that Judge Garland is not only supremely qualified for the position, but is also well-equipped to address the many challenges before us. Judge Garland has dedicated much of his life to the American justice system. Following his Second Circuit and Supreme Court clerkships, he began his career at the Department of Justice before moving to private practice, where he represented clients in commercial cases with a focus on administrative and antitrust law. Judge Garland later served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the District of Columbia, where he prosecuted narcotics activity and white-collar crime, as Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, and as Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General. In this last role, he worked on many of the Department of Justice’s most crucial investigations, including the Oklahoma City bombing and the UNABOMBER case. He became deeply respected by his colleagues for his commitment to evenhanded application of the law without regard for political pressures or media scrutiny. Throughout his twenty-four years on the bench, Judge Garland has demonstrated his commitment to the Constitution and the rule of law. He has been praised for his absolute fidelity to statutory law as clarified by precedent. His lifelong commitment to civil rights has often been manifested in his decisions that have ensured that individuals are protected from unlawful discrimination regardless of age, race, or gender. Judge Garland’sfamiliaritywith public and privatelitigationin varied areasof the law,as well as his time on the D.C.Circuit,make him well-suitedto lead the Departmentof Justice. Moreover,hisreputationfor impartialityand hissteadfastcommitmentto fairness will inspirea Departmentthat prioritizesits independenceand integrity. The work and reputation of the Department of Justice are as important as they have ever been. Judge Garland is the right person to ensure the fair administration of justice, whether related to national security, public integrity, civil rights, antitrust, crime, or other pressing issues. He is also the right person to do so with integrity, humility, and a complete understanding of the substantial responsibility on his shoulders at this time. As Judge Garland himself expressed when he was nominated, the rule of law is the very foundation of our democracy. And we can unequivocally state that Judge Garland is the right person to ensure that the rule of law remains, in our national consciousness, one of our most deeply-held values. We are confident that Judge MerrickGarlandwill dedicate himselfto the Departmentof Justice and itsvalues,and we urge the Senate to confirm himpromptlyas the next Attorney Generalof the UnitedStates. Sincerely, AlbertoR.Gonzales Eric Holder Attorney Generalof the UnitedStates, Attorney General of the United States, 2005 – 2007 2009 – 2015; Deputy Attorney General, 1997 – 2001; U.S. Attorney, District of Columbia, 1993 – 1997 LorettaLynch Michael B.Mukasey Attorney Generalof the UnitedStates, Attorney General of the United States, 2015 – 2017; U.S.Attorney,E.Districtof 2007 – 2009 New York,2010 – 2015 StuartM.Gerson Peter Keisler ActingAttorney General of the UnitedStates, Acting Attorney General of the United States, 1993; Assistant Attorney General, 2007; Assistant Attorney General for the Civil 1989– 1993 Division, 2003 – 2007; Acting Associate Attorney General and Principal Deputy Associate Attorney General, 2002 Sally Q. Yates Donald Ayer Acting Attorney General of the United States, Deputy Attorney General, 1989 – 1990; U.S. 2017; Deputy Attorney General, 2015 – 2017; Attorney, E. District of California, U.S. Attorney, N. District of Georgia, 2004, 1982 – 1986 2010 – 2015 James M.Cole Carol E. Dinkins Deputy Attorney General, 2010 – 2015 Deputy Attorney General, 1984 – 1985; Assistant Attorney General for the Environment and Natural Resources Division, 1981 – 1983 Mark R. Filip Jamie S. Gorelick Deputy Attorney General, 2008 – 2009 Deputy Attorney General, 1994 – 1997 DavidW. Ogden Larry D. Thompson DeputyAttorney General,2009 – 2010; Deputy Attorney General, 2001– 2003; U.S. AssistantAttorney Generalfor the Civil Attorney, N.District of Georgia, 1982 – 1986 Division,1999– 2001 EdwardC. O’Callaghan GaryG.Grindler ActingDeputyAttorney General,2019; ActingDeputyAttorneyGeneral,2010; PrincipalAssociateDeputyAttorney General Chiefof Staff to the AttorneyGeneral, 2018 – 2019 2011– 2012; PrincipleAssociateDeputy AttorneyGeneral,1999 Theodore B. Olson Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. Solicitor General, 2001 – 2004; Assistant Solicitor General, 2011– 2016 Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, 1981 – 1984 Seth Waxman Walter E. Dellinger III Solicitor General, 1997 – 2001 Acting Solicitor General, 1996 – 1997; Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel, 1993 – 1996 Ian Heath Gershengorn Neal Kumar Katyal Acting Solicitor General 2016 – 2017; Acting Solicitor General, 2010 – 2011; Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, 2013 – 2016 2009 – 2011 Wayne Budd Daniel Marcus Associate Attorney General, 1992 – 1993; Associate Attorney General, 2000 – 2001 U.S. Attorney, District of Massachusetts, 1989 – 1992 Kevin J. O’Connor Thomas J. Perrelli Associate Attorney General, 2008 – 2009; Associate Attorney General, 2009 – 2012 U.S. Attorney, District of Connecticut, 2002 – 2008 John Schmidt Tony West Associate Attorney General, 1994 – 1997 Associate Attorney General, 2012 – 2014; Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division, 2009 – 2012 William Baer BrianA. Benczkowski Acting Associate Attorney General, AssistantAttorney Generalfor the Criminal 2016 – 2017; Assistant Attorney General for Division,2018 – 2020 the Antitrust Division, 2013 – 2016 LannyBreuer Michael Chertoff AssistantAttorney Generalfor the Criminal Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division,2009 – 2013 Division, 2001 – 2003; U.S. Attorney, District of New Jersey, 1990 – 1994 Alice S. Fisher Kenneth Wainstein AssistantAttorney Generalfor the Criminal Assistant Attorney General for National Division,2005 – 2008 Security, 2006 – 2008; U.S. Attorney, District of Columbia, 2004 – 2006 John C. Richter William F. Weld Acting Assistant Attorney General for the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Criminal Division, 2005; U.S. Attorney, W. Division, 1986 – 1988; U.S. Attorney, District District of Oklahoma, 2005 – 2009 of Massachusetts, 1981 – 1986 KentAlexander A. Lee Bentley,III U.S.Attorney,N.Districtof Georgia, U.S.Attorney,MiddleDistrictof Florida, 1994 – 1997 2013 – 2017 DanielG. Bogden GregoryA. Brower U.S.Attorney,Districtof Nevada, U.S.Attorney,Districtof Nevada, 2001– 2007,2009 – 2017 2008 – 2009 KenyenBrown JohnL.Brownlee U.S.Attorney, S. District of Alabama, U.S.Attorney, W. District of Virginia, 2009 – 2017 2001– 2008 Donna A. Bucella Dennis K.Burke U.S.Attorney, Middle District of Florida, U.S.Attorney, District of Arizona, 1999 – 2001 2009 – 2011 RichardG.Callahan MarkT. Calloway U.S.Attorney,E.District of Missouri, U.S.Attorney,W. District of NorthCarolina, 2010 – 2017 1994 – 2001 Tony Canales RobertCapers U.S.Attorney,S. Districtof Texas, U.S.Attorney,E.Districtof New York, 1977 – 1980 2015 – 2017 DonaldJ. Cazayoux,Jr. Paul K.Charlton U.S.Attorney,MiddleDistrictof Louisiana, U.S.Attorney,Districtof Arizona, 2010 – 2013 2001– 2006 RobertJ. Cleary SanfordC. Coats U.S.Attorney,Districtof New Jersey, U.S.Attorney,W. District of Oklahoma, 1999– 2002 2009 – 2016 W.J. Michael Cody MichaelW. Cotter U.S.Attorney, W. District of Tennessee, U.S.Attorney, District of Montana, 1977 – 1981 2009 – 2017 RichardCullen Deirde M.Daly U.S.Attorney, E.District of Virginia, U.S.Attorney, District of Connecticut, 1991– 1993 2013 – 2017 GregoryDavis ThomasE.DelahantyII U.S.Attorney,S. Districtof Mississippi, U.S.Attorney,Districtof Maine, 2012 – 2017 1980 – 1981,2010 – 2017 StevenDettelbach TammyDickinson U.S.Attorney,N.Districtof Ohio, U.S.Attorney,W. District of Missouri, 2009 – 2016 2013 – 2017 EdwardL.Dowd,Jr. Jenny A. Durkan U.S.Attorney,E.District of Missouri, U.S.Attorney,W. District of Washington, 1993 – 1999 2009 – 2014 Conner Eldridge Zachary Fardon U.S.Attorney, W. District of Arkansas, U.S.Attorney, N.District of Illinois, 2010 – 2015 2013 – 2017 DavidFein Wifredo Ferrer U.S.Attorney, District of Connecticut, U.S.Attorney, S. District of Florida, 2010 – 2013 2010 – 2017 Paul J. Fishman JohnFishwick U.S.Attorney,Districtof New Jersey, U.S.Attorney,W. District of Virginia, 2009 – 2017 2015 – 2017 RobertB.Fiske,Jr. PatrickFitzgerald U.S.Attorney,S. Districtof New York, U.S.Attorney,N.Districtof Illinois, 1976 – 1980 2001– 2012 DeborahR.Gilg Wendy H.Goggin U.S.Attorney,Districtof Nebraska, U.S.Attorney,MiddleDistrictof Tennessee, 2009 – 2017 1998 – 2000 JonathanL.Goldstein BoothGoodwin
Recommended publications
  • US Policy Scan 2021
    US Policy Scan 2021 1 • US Policy Scan 2021 Introduction Welcome to Dentons 2021 Policy Scan, an in-depth look at policy a number of Members of Congress and Senators on both sides of at the Federal level and in each of the 50 states. This document the aisle and with a public exhausted by the anger and overheated is meant to be both a resource and a guide. A preview of the rhetoric that has characterized the last four years. key policy questions for the next year in the states, the House of Representatives, the Senate and the new Administration. A Nonetheless, with a Congress closely divided between the parties resource for tracking the people who will be driving change. and many millions of people who even now question the basic legitimacy of the process that led to Biden’s election, it remains to In addition to a dive into more than 15 policy areas, you will find be determined whether the President-elect’s goals are achievable brief profiles of Biden cabinet nominees and senior White House or whether, going forward, the Trump years have fundamentally staff appointees, the Congressional calendar, as well as the and permanently altered the manner in which political discourse Session dates and policy previews in State Houses across the will be conducted. What we can say with total confidence is that, in country. We discuss redistricting, preview the 2022 US Senate such a politically charged environment, it will take tremendous skill races and provide an overview of key decided and pending cases and determination on the part of the President-elect, along with a before the Supreme Court of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayorkas DOJ Letter
    January 14, 2021 Senator Gary Peters Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Senator Rob Portman Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 340 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Senator Peters and Senator Portman, We are a group of eighty-five former senior officials of the United States Department of Justice who have served in administrations of both political parties. We all personally know and/or have worked with Alejandro Mayorkas, President-elect Joe Biden’s nominee to serve as Secretary of Homeland Security, during his many years of public service – as a federal prosecutor, as United States Attorney in Los Angeles and as a leader in the Department of Homeland Security during the Obama Administration. We have had ample opportunity to assess Ali’s character as he has handled the myriad challenges of government service, and have seen in Ali the unimpeachable integrity, the sound judgment and the commitment to public service that make him an ideal choice to serve in this critical position. For that reason, we wholeheartedly and unequivocally support Ali’s nomination, and we urge your Committee and the United States Senate to quickly confirm him as Secretary of Homeland Security so that DHS can have confirmed leadership in place on the first day of the new administration. Ali has a wealth of experience that uniquely equips him to serve effectively as the DHS Secretary. First he draws on his experience in the Justice Department, and specifically on his role and duty as a federal prosecutor to defend the Constitution and protect individual liberties in the federal criminal justice system.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 114 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 162 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, MARCH 17, 2016 No. 43 House of Representatives The House met at 9 a.m. and was point of order that a quorum is not Gunny Stanton first began his train- called to order by the Speaker. present. ing, he attended the basic EOD course f The SPEAKER. Pursuant to clause 8, at Eglin Air Force Base. While in train- rule XX, further proceedings on this ing, his block tests and final examina- PRAYER question will be postponed. tion scores were so high that his The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick The point of no quorum is considered records remain intact to this day. J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: withdrawn. In the course of his 18 years in the Marine Corps, Stanton earned many Merciful God, thank You for giving f us another day. awards too numerous to list in this Your care and wisdom are shown to PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE space. He is preceded in death by his fa- us by the way You extend Your king- The SPEAKER. Will the gentleman ther, Michael Dale Stanton Sr.; and a dom into our world down to the present from Texas (Mr. VEASEY) come forward brother, Brian Stanton. Gunny Stanton day. Your word reveals every aspect of and lead the House in the Pledge of Al- is survived by his loving family: his Your saving plan. You accomplish Your legiance. wife, Terri Stanton; his mother, Gloria designed purpose in and through the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
    Case 1:20-cv-00302-WES-LDA Document 8 Filed 07/22/21 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND ______________________________ ) FELIPE DUBON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 20-302 WES ) MERRICK GARLAND1, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 5. Plaintiff filed this instant action after Defendants denied his Form I-212 Application for Permission to Reapply for Admission into the United States After Deportation or Removal. Compl. ¶ 1, ECF No. 1. He asks that this Court compel Defendants to “re- adjudicate his Form I-212” as it was “improperly decided.” Id. Defendants move to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(3), and 12(b)6). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will GRANT the Defendants’ 12(b)(1) motion and dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction and require a jurisdictional prerequisite, which “implicates a court’s 1 Merrick Garland is now the United States Attorney General. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has been substituted for U.S. Attorney General William Barr as Defendant. Case 1:20-cv-00302-WES-LDA Document 8 Filed 07/22/21 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: <pageID> constitutional and statutory power to hear and resolve a case.” Alphas Co., Inc. v. William H. Kopke, Jr., Inc., 708 F.3d 33, 36 (1st Cir. 2013). It is the plaintiff’s burden to prove this jurisdictional prerequisite and establish that the court has subject matter jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • August 25, 2021 the Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General
    MARK BRNOVICH DAVE YOST ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL August 25, 2021 The Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General 950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Constitutionality of Illegal Reentry Criminal Statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Dear Attorney General Garland, We, the undersigned attorneys general, write as chief legal officers of our States to inquire about your intent to appeal the decision in United States v. Carrillo-Lopez, No. 3:20-cr- 00026-MMD-WGC, ECF. 60 (D. Nev. Aug. 18, 2021). As you know, in that decision, Chief Judge Du found unconstitutional 8 U.S.C. § 1326, the statute that criminalizes the illegal reentry of previously removed aliens. We appreciate that you recently filed a notice of appeal, preserving your ability to defend the law on appeal. We now urge you to follow through by defending the law before the Ninth Circuit and (if necessary) the Supreme Court. We ask that you confirm expeditiously DOJ’s intent to do so. Alternatively, if you do not intend to seek reversal of that decision and instead decide to cease prosecutions for illegal reentry in some or all of the country, we ask that you let us know, in writing, so that the undersigned can take appropriate action. Section 1326, as part of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, is unremarkable in that it requires all aliens—no matter their race or country of origin—to enter the country lawfully. In finding the law racially discriminatory against “Latinx persons,” Chief Judge Du made some truly astounding claims, especially considering that, under the Immigration and Nationality Act, Mexico has more legal permanent residents in the United States, by far, than any other country.1 Chief Judge Du determined that, because most illegal reentrants at the border are from Mexico, the law has an impermissible “disparate impact” on Mexicans.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nomination of Chief Judge Merrick B. Garland to the Supreme Court of the United States
    THE NOMINATION OF CHIEF JUDGE MERRICK B. GARLAND TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES A REPORT BY THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. MAY 6, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Background .................................................................................................................... 6 Early Life, Education, and Clerkships ...................................................................... 6 Private Practice and Initial Government Service ..................................................... 6 Clinton Justice Department ...................................................................................... 8 Nomination to the D.C. Circuit ............................................................................... 10 Service as a Judge .................................................................................................... 11 Employment and Housing Discrimination ................................................................. 13 Employment Discrimination .................................................................................... 13 Notable Cases ....................................................................................................... 13 Mixed Rulings ....................................................................................................... 18 Reversals ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Report (PDF)
    Outside Influence: Out-of-State Money in the 2016 Senate Elections Chris MacKenzie U.S. PIRG Education Fund October 24, 2016 Acknowledgements The author thanks Tyler Creighton of ReThink Media and Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21 for reviewing the first draft of this report and providing thoughtful and informed comments. The author also thanks Julian Notaro for his research and editorial assistance. The author bears any responsibility for factual errors. The views expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. 2016 U.S. PIRG Education Fund. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons. Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0. With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursuing their own narrow agendas, U.S. PIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest. U.S. PIRG Education Fund, a 501(c)(3) organization, works to protect consumers and promote good government. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public, and offer Americans meaningful opportunities for civic participation. Design and layout: Buddy Simpson Introduction Control of the United States Senate is at stake in the 2016 elections. Out of 34 senate races nationally, the outcome could be decided by just several swing states and a few key constituencies.1 But there is another deciding factor in this year’s race for the senate: money.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C
    Hon. Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 July 9, 2020 Re: Support for Granting Clemency to Individuals Placed on Home Confinement Pursuant the CARES Act Dear Attorney General Garland: I write on behalf of Law Enforcement Leaders to Reduce Crime & Incarceration, a national coalition including over 200 current and former law enforcement officials, across the political spectrum, dedicated to protecting public safety and reducing unnecessary incarceration. We are deeply troubled by the U.S. Department of Justice’s (“DOJ”) inaction as it pertains to the approximately 4,500 individuals who face the threat of reincarceration due to the prior administration’s January 15, 2021, Office of Legal Counsel memo (“OLC memo”). The OLC memo advises that these individuals — placed on home confinement pursuant the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act — be returned to full custody in federal prison upon the end of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 For the reasons outlined below, we respectfully urge the DOJ to recommend that President Biden grant clemency to these individuals, who have already been safely returned to their communities.2 Enacted by Congress in March of 2020, the CARES Act granted the Attorney General emergency authority to expand home confinement as long as emergency conditions “materially affect” the functioning of the Bureau of Prisons (BOP).3 As a result, Attorney General Bill Barr directed the BOP to place eligible incarcerated
    [Show full text]
  • June 7, 2021 the Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General
    June 7, 2021 The Honorable Merrick Garland Attorney General of the United States The Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Cc: Joe Gaeta, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Dear Attorney General Garland, We write you today to follow up on a letter was sent to U.S. Attorney General William P. Barr on August 20, 2019. That correspondence is included as a separate attachment. We wrote at the time because we were concerned about reports regarding the involvement of agents of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in recent Brazilian prosecutorial and judicial proceedings which have generated substantial controversy and are perceived by many in Brazil as a threat to democracy and rule of law in that country. This issue is still of concern to us today. Regrettably, we did not receive a substantive response from Attorney General Barr to the questions we raised at the time. Given your demonstrated commitment to government transparency, rule of law and impartial justice in both the United States and throughout the world, we trust that you will respond to our earlier inquiries with more detail and substance. Since August of 2019, there have been important developments in Brazil. In March of this year, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) annulled the outstanding convictions against former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, also known as President Lula. These convictions resulted from a Brazilian prosecutorial and judicial process, also known as the Lava Jato operation, that raised serious questions about impartial justice and due process in the former President’s case.
    [Show full text]
  • California Dnc Press Democrat
    CALIFORNIA DNC PRESS DEMOCRAT MAY 2017 PAGE 1 DNC CHAIR NAMES TRANSITION ADVISORY TEAM BY MICHAEL KAPP, DNC MEMBER At the end of February, the DNC met in Atlanta for our Winter Meeting. Our main responsibility was electing new DNC officers. For me, this meeting was a culmination of months of organizing and campaign- ing nationally for my can- didate for DNC Chair (and the clear favorite of Cali- fornia Democrats): Keith Ellison, the congressman from Minnesota. While the DNC elections California DNC Members in Atlanta did not turn out the way many California Demo- crats wanted (for the rec- ord, 18 out of 20 of Cali- DNC DEPUTY CHAIR PLAYS A SIGNIFICANT ROLE fornia’s elected DNC members voted for El- BY ALEX GALLARDO ROOKER AND KEITH UMEMOTO, DNC RBC MEMBERS lison), I was pleased that the first act of new DNC Chair Tom Perez was to New DNC National Chairper- specify that the Treasurer and ask the membership to son Tom Perez’s first act was to National Finance Chair are suspend the rules and get unanimous consent to have members of the DNC Budget appoint Keith Ellison as Rep. Keith Ellison named the and Finance Committee, but Deputy Chair. DNC’s Deputy Chair. that is essentially it. In March, Chair Perez What does it mean for Rep. Does this mean that Deputy announced a 36 member Ellison to be the DNC Deputy Chair Ellison holds a simply Transition Advisory Com- Chair? ceremonial position? No, there mittee that drew from The Charter and Bylaws of is precedence for having a Dep- Democratic leaders the Democratic Party of the uty Chair of the DNC, or in an- throughout the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Mitch Mcconnell United States Senate Majority Leader 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C
    Hon. Mitch McConnell United States Senate Majority Leader 317 Russell Senate Office Building Washington, D.C. 20510 May 5, 2016 Re: Statement of Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Regarding Nomination of Judge Merrick Garland as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court We, the undersigned members of the Board of Directors and Trustees of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, write to present our Statement Regarding the Nomination of Judge Merrick Garland as an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court. Since its creation in 1963 at the urging of President John F. Kennedy, the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law has been devoted to the recognition and enforcement of civil rights in the United States. While we have seen significant progress, the challenges of unlawful discrimination remain. Recognizing the Supreme Court’s critical role in civil rights enforcement and the central role that the Court plays in our democracy, the Lawyers’ Committee has long reviewed the record of nominees to the Court to determine if the nominee demonstrates views that are consistent with the core civil rights principles for which we have long advocated. Every term, critical cases come before the Supreme Court concerning issues of great public importance, including cases concerning the interpretation and application of the Constitution and federal civil rights laws. In evaluating nominees to the Court, the Lawyers’ Committee has employed a rigorous standard with two distinct components: (1) exceptional competence to serve on the Court, and (2) profound respect for the importance of protecting the civil rights afforded by the Constitution and the nation’s civil rights laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2021
    THE UNIVERSITY of MISSISSIPPI One Hundred Sixty-Eighth COMMENCEMENT Saturday, the First of May 2021 THE UNIVERSITY of MISSISSIPPI TM One Hundred Sixty-Eighth COMMENCEMENT Saturday, the First of May 2021 Office of the Chancellor On behalf of the faculty and staff of the University of Mississippi, we extend a sincere welcome to the students, parents, families and friends gathered to celebrate the university’s 168th Commencement. We are pleased to recognize the spirit of our community and honor the academic accomplishments and dedication of our beloved candidates for graduation of the Class of 2021. Commencement is a time-honored tradition that recognizes the outstanding work and achievements of students and faculty. It is an exciting time for us, and we know this is a special occasion for all of you. Our students are the heart and soul of Ole Miss, and we take pride and inspiration in their accomplishments and growth. Today’s ceremony celebrates years of study, hard work and careful preparation, and we’re grateful that you have come to show your support, love and belief in these graduates. The members of the Class of 2021 accomplished so much during their time as Ole Miss students — they pursued their passions, maximized their potential and pushed their boundaries through outstanding learning opportunities and life-changing experiences. In addition, they endured the disruption caused by the pandemic, which has taught us all important life lessons about resilience and the need to be adaptable. Now, we can’t wait to see how they’ll build and grow personal legacies of achievement, service and leadership.
    [Show full text]