Revisione Dello Status IUCN Per Alcuni Taxa Inclusi Nella Lista Rossa Della Regione Campania

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Revisione Dello Status IUCN Per Alcuni Taxa Inclusi Nella Lista Rossa Della Regione Campania Delpinoa 49: 77-88. 2007 Revisione dello status IUCN per alcuni taxa inclusi nella Lista Rossa della Regione Campania M. INNANGI, A. IZZO, V. LA VALVA Dipartimento delle Scienze Biologiche, Sezione di Biologia Vegetale, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Foria 223, 80139 Napoli. [email protected] [email protected] Riassunto. Utilizzando la metodologia IUCN è Abstract. Using IUCN methodologies, the status of stato riesaminato lo status delle seguenti sei specie the following six rare species of Campania rare della Campania considerate a rischio: (Southern Italy) considered at risk has been re- Chamaerops humilis L., Globularia neapolitana O. examined: Chamaerops humilis L., Globularia Schwarz, Medicago arborea L., Parnassia palus- neapolitana O. Schwarz, Medicago arborea L., tris L., Pinguicula crystallina Sibth. & Smith. Parnassia palustris L., Pinguicula crystallina subsp. hirtiflora (Ten.) Strid, Simethis planifolia Sibth. & Smith. subsp. hirtiflora (Ten.) Strid, (L.) Gren. & Godr. Indagini di campo hanno con- Simethis planifolia (L.) Gren. & Godr. Field sur- fermato lo stato di rischio per Medicago arborea, veys confirmed the degree of risk for Medicago Pinguicula crystallina subsp. hirtiflora e Simethis arborea, Pinguicula crystallina subsp. hirtiflora, planifolia ed hanno fatto emergere uno stato più and Simethis planifolia, and showed higher risk grave di quello precedentemente assegnato a than previously reported for Chamaerops humilis, Chamaerops humilis, Globularia neapolitana e Globularia neapolitana, and Parnassia palustris; Parnassia palustris, fornendo dati utili per la con- they also provided data useful for the conservation servazione di queste rare entità. of these rare entities. Key words: Campania, Chamaerops humilis, Endangered species, Globularia neapolitana, IUCN, Medicago arborea, Parnassia palustris, Pinguicula crystallina, Red List, Simethis planifolia Nel Luglio 2008 è stato pubblicato a cura utilizzato al mondo in ambito scientifico e con- della Società Botanica Italiana “Flora da con- servazionistico. La versione più recente, ed servare; iniziativa per l’implementazione in attualmente in uso, dei criteri e delle categorie Italia delle categorie e dei criteri IUCN (2001) IUCN risale al 2001 ed è accompagnata da per la redazione di nuove Liste Rosse” (ROSSI linee guida contenenti precise indicazioni et al. 2008). metodologiche su come valutare un taxon Il protocollo IUCN, introdotto nel 1976 (IUCN 2001, 2006). (LUCAS &WALTERS 1976), è stato migliorato CONTI et al. (1997) hanno individuato tutte attraverso l’aggiornamento delle categorie di le specie della Campania che rientravano in minaccia nel 1991 (MACE &LANDE 1991) e la una categoria di rischio IUCN, ossia VU, EN e redazione di criteri più oggettivi con la defini- CR, consentendo l’individuazione di 38 taxa a zione di soglie numeriche per alcuni parametri rischio, di cui 3 considerati CR e 35 VU. valutabili quantitativamente, come il numero Sulla base dei dati di CONTI et al. (1997) di individui, l’areale e l’area occupata. Grazie sono state prese in esame sei specie, tutte pre- a questa continua evoluzione e all’implemen- cedentemente ritenute VU. Le specie indivi- tazione di valutazioni quantitative oltre che duate sono Chamaerops humilis L., Globula- qualitative, il sistema IUCN è divenuto il più ria neapolitana O. Schwarz, Medicago arbo- rea L., Parnassia palustris L., Pinguicula indivuare con maggiore precisione, laddove crystallina Sibth. & Smith. subsp. hirtiflora possibile, le stazioni di rinvenimento dei taxa. (Ten.) Strid, Simethis planifolia (L.) Gren. & Questi dati di tipo storico hanno consentito, Godr. inoltre, una pur parziale ricostruzione diacro- Per le sei specie sopra elencate è stata con- nica della distribuzione delle specie in Cam- dotta un’indagine bibliografica, esaminati pania. degli exsiccata ed effettuate indagini in campo Le indagini in campo sono state condotte per l’acquisizione dei dati necessari alla reda- nel periodo Marzo-Novembre 2009. Per la zione di una moderna Lista Rossa regionale. georereferenziazione ci si è avvalsi di un GPS cartografico. METODOLOGIA Tutti i dati sono stati schedati seguendo il protocollo IUCN (ROSSI et al. 2008). La nomenclatura adottata nel presente lavo- Le schede conclusive proposte per le sei ro è quella seguita da CONTI et al. (2005), men- specie sono state organizzate secondo il mo- tre per l’inquadramento sistematico ci si è rife- dello proposto dalla S.B.I. adattato alla sola riti a PIGNATTI (1982). regione Campania. Per le specie oggetto di stu- L’indagine bibliografica è stata finalizzata dio viene aggiornato lo status IUCN per la all’individuazione dell’areale delle specie sia a Regione. livello europeo sia a livello nazionale. Le flore La distribuzione viene riportata per la sola locali campane, in seguito, hanno permesso di Regione Campania e non per tutto il territorio reperire tutte le informazioni e le segnalazioni nazionale. precedenti per le specie sul territorio regionale. Il numero di stazioni indicato tiene conto Per la distribuzione europea delle entità si è principalmente delle stazioni, rinvenute o consultato TUTIN et al. (1964-1980), mentre meno nel presente studio, riportate nelle flore per quella italiana si sono seguite le indicazio- della Campania. Segnalazioni vaghe non veri- ni di FIORI (1923-1929) e PIGNATTI (1982). ficate non sono state tenute in conto, mentre Sono stati, inoltre, consultati i contributi di sono state inserite le stazioni indagate con il GUADAGNO (1932), RICCIARDI (1996), MORAL- presente studio e non riportate nelle flore. DO et al. (1985-1986), CAPUTO et al. (1989- La EOO (Extent Of Occurrence) è stata cal- 1990), DI NATALE & LA VALVA (2000), GUADA- colata costruendo delle aree plausibili di esten- GNO (1918). sione dell’areale della specie attorno alle sta- Lo studio e la raccolta dei dati sono stati zioni rinvenute e a quelle conosciute nella condotti nelle diverse aree della Campania in bibliografia floristica. Nel caso di ampie aree cui le entità erano state segnalate. La ricerca per le quali il taxon non è seganalato e per delle suddette non è stata limitata alle sole quelle con chiara evidenza di inospitabilità segnalazioni presenti nelle Flore, ma è stata dell’habitat, si è fatta la somma delle varie sot- condotta anche in altre aree con l’aspettativa di tozone disgiunte. trovare stazioni sconosciute. La AOO (Area Of Occupancy) è stata cal- Gli ambienti di ricerca sono stati: Campi colata in due modi diversi. Il primo tiene conto Flegrei, Napoli, Penisola sorrentino-amalfita- delle indicazioni IUCN riguardo una griglia di na, Monti Lattari, Capri, Monti Picentini. 2x2 km (o, in casi eccezionali, di 1x1 km) ed è L’esame degli exsiccata delle specie scelte quello utilizzato ufficialmente nei criteri. è stato condotto nell’Herbarium Neapolitanum L’altro indica l’area reale che le specie occu- (NAP) della Sezione di Biologia Vegetale del pano sul territorio calcolata o stimata diretta- Dipartimento delle Scienze Biologiche dell’U- mente sul campo. niversità di Napoli Federico II. Sono state con- sultate principalmente le collezioni dei due più RISULTATI importanti floristi che hanno operato in Cam- pania, ossia Michele Tenore e Giovanni Gus- Si riportano di seguito i risultati del lavoro sone. L’esame degli exsiccata ha permesso di di revisione e la lista delle stazioni rinvenute e 78 verificate per le sei specie in Campania. nella zona caprese. 9.10 Other: la presenza di numerosissimi individui coltivati, provenienti Chamaerops humilis L. in molti casi da luoghi lontani, può mettere a Palmae. rischio il genoma delle popolazioni selvatiche. Biologia. Nanofanerofita o fanerofita arbo- 10.1 Recreation/tourism: sia la costa amalfita- rea che fiorisce tra Maggio e Giugno alle quote na sia quella caprese sono interessate da fortis- tra 0 e 600 m s.l.m. (PIGNATTI 1982). sima pressione turistica che può sicuramente Ecologia. Macchie e boscaglie sempre avere impatti negativi su questa specie. verdi (PIGNATTI 1982). Per la Campania si rin- Criteri IUCN applicati: in base ai dati dis- viene su rupi e falesie prossime al mare, solita- ponibili è stato applicato il criterio di indiciz- mente in zone inaccessibili con vegetazione zazione C. non molto fitta. Criterio C. Sottocriteri: C2 - Declino conti- Distribuzione in Campania. Regione bio- nuo dedotto e osservato del numero di indivi- geografica: Regione Mediterranea, Provincia dui maturi. Opzioni: (i) nessuna sottopopola- tirrenica, Settore Campano-Laziale (PEDROTTI zione costituita da più di 250 individui maturi. 1996). Province amministrative: Napoli, Saler- Questa entità vive tuttora in Campania, no. Numero di stazioni: 2 per la Campania confermando tutte le segnalazioni storiche (coste di Capri e zona prossima a Capo affidabili. Tuttavia è osservato già dagli autori d’Orso). precedenti il declino continuo della popolazio- Gruppo corologico ed areale globale. ne di C. humilis soprattutto nelle coste capresi, Regione mediterranea occidentale (PIGNATTI dove la specie è stata relegata, soprattutto nel- 1982), con estensione ad est fino a Malta l’ultimo secolo in funzione delle minacce (TUTIN et al. 1964-1980). sopra riportate, in ambiente irraggiungibili dal- Minacce. 1.4 Infrastructure development: l’uomo. Discorso simile si può fare per la costa la sensibile urbanizzazione, soprattutto nel amalfitana che, per sua natura, rappresentereb- tratto delle coste capresi, è una minaccia sensi- be l’optimum ecologico per C. humilis, che bile per questa specie
Recommended publications
  • What Is a Tree in the Mediterranean Basin Hotspot? a Critical Analysis
    Médail et al. Forest Ecosystems (2019) 6:17 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-019-0170-6 RESEARCH Open Access What is a tree in the Mediterranean Basin hotspot? A critical analysis Frédéric Médail1* , Anne-Christine Monnet1, Daniel Pavon1, Toni Nikolic2, Panayotis Dimopoulos3, Gianluigi Bacchetta4, Juan Arroyo5, Zoltán Barina6, Marwan Cheikh Albassatneh7, Gianniantonio Domina8, Bruno Fady9, Vlado Matevski10, Stephen Mifsud11 and Agathe Leriche1 Abstract Background: Tree species represent 20% of the vascular plant species worldwide and they play a crucial role in the global functioning of the biosphere. The Mediterranean Basin is one of the 36 world biodiversity hotspots, and it is estimated that forests covered 82% of the landscape before the first human impacts, thousands of years ago. However, the spatial distribution of the Mediterranean biodiversity is still imperfectly known, and a focus on tree species constitutes a key issue for understanding forest functioning and develop conservation strategies. Methods: We provide the first comprehensive checklist of all native tree taxa (species and subspecies) present in the Mediterranean-European region (from Portugal to Cyprus). We identified some cases of woody species difficult to categorize as trees that we further called “cryptic trees”. We collected the occurrences of tree taxa by “administrative regions”, i.e. country or large island, and by biogeographical provinces. We studied the species-area relationship, and evaluated the conservation issues for threatened taxa following IUCN criteria. Results: We identified 245 tree taxa that included 210 species and 35 subspecies, belonging to 33 families and 64 genera. It included 46 endemic tree taxa (30 species and 16 subspecies), mainly distributed within a single biogeographical unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Landscape Palms
    Cooperative Extension ARIZONA LANDSCAPE PALMS ELIZABETH D AVISON Department of Plant Sciences JOHN BEGEMAN Pima County Cooperative Extension AZ1021 • 12/2000 Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, James A. Christenson, Director, Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of Arizona. The University of Arizona College of Agriculture and Life Sciences is an equal opportunity employer authorized to provide research, educational information and other services to individuals and institutions that function without regard to sex, race, religion, color, national origin, age, Vietnam Era Veteran's status, or disability. Contents Landscape Use ......................................... 3 Adaptation ................................................ 3 Planting Palms ......................................... 3 Care of Established Palms...................... 5 Diseases and Insect Pests ....................... 6 Palms for Arizona .................................... 6 Feather Palms ........................................... 8 Fan Palms................................................ 12 Palm-like Plants ..................................... 16 This information has been reviewed by university faculty. ag.arizona.edu/pubs/garden/az1121.pdf 2 The luxuriant tropical appearance and stately Adaptation silhouette of palms add much to the Arizona landscape. Palms generally can be grown below the 4000 ft level Few other plants are as striking in low and mid elevation in Arizona. However, microclimate may make the gardens. Although winter frosts and low humidity limit difference between success and failure in a given location. the choices somewhat, a good number of palms are Frost pockets, where nighttime cold air tends to collect, available, ranging from the dwarf Mediterranean Fan should be avoided, especially for the tender species. Palms palm to the massive Canary Island Date palm.
    [Show full text]
  • Chamaerops Humilis Chamaerops Is a Genus of Flowering Plants in the Palm Family Arecaceae
    Chamaerops humilis Chamaerops is a genus of flowering plants in the palm family Arecaceae. The only currently fully accepted species is Chamaerops humilis, variously called European fan palm or the Mediterranean dwarf palm. It is one of the most cold-hardy palms and is used in landscaping in temperate climates. Taxonomy Apart from the fully accepted Chamaerops humilis, there are a few taxa of unresolved status plus numerous species synonymised under Chamaerops humilis. The genus Chamaerops is closely related to the genus Trachycarpus. The genera differ in that Trachycarpus lacks the clumping habit only forms single stems without basal suckers), the spiny leaf stems (spineless in Trachycarpus), and in small details of the flower anatomy. Description Chamaerops humilis is a shrub-like clumping palm, with several stems growing from a single base. It has an underground rhizome which produces shoots with palmate, sclerophyllous leaves. The stems grow slowly and often tightly together, eventually reaching 2–5 m (10–20 ft) tall with a trunk diameter of 20–25 cm (8–10 in). The petioles are armed with numerous sharp, needle-like spines; these may protect the stem growing point from browsing animals. The flowers are borne in dense, short inflorescences at the tops of the stems. The plants usually, but not invariably, are dioecious with male and female flowers on separate plants. The number of flowers per inflorescence is highly variable for both male and female plants, depending on the size of the inflorescence. The seed (usually 0.6–0.8 g) contains a small cylindrical embryo, which is surrounded by several layers, from inner to outer as follows: a nutritious endosperm, a wide woody layer or endocarp, a fleshy and fibrous mesocarp (the pulp), and the thin outer layer or exocarp.
    [Show full text]
  • Chamaerops Humilis1
    Fact Sheet FPS-123 October, 1999 Chamaerops humilis1 Edward F. Gilman2 Introduction This small, multi-stemmed, hardy palm is the only one native to Europe, and is hardier than most palms (Fig. 1). The curved, clumping, short trunks and gray-green, fan-shaped leaves, borne thickly in a bushy head, make a stunning sculptural element in a garden or patio containers. The fine- textured fronds make the palm stand out from other plants in the landscape. Leaf color on individual plants ranges from light green through silver. Although growth rate is slow, it is well worth the wait since even small plants will stand out nicely in almost any landscape. General Information Scientific name: Chamaerops humilis Pronunciation: ku-MEE-rops HEW-mil-liss Common name(s): European Fan Palm Family: Palmae Plant type: tree; shrub USDA hardiness zones: 8B through 11 (Fig. 2) Planting month for zone 8: year round Figure 1. European Fan Palm. Planting month for zone 9: year round Planting month for zone 10 and 11: year round Origin: not native to North America Description Uses: specimen; container or above-ground planter; near a deck Height: 8 to 15 feet or patio; foundation; border; mass planting; accent; suitable for Spread: 6 to 10 feet growing indoors Plant habit: upright; irregular outline or silhouette Availablity: generally available in many areas within its Plant density: moderate hardiness range Growth rate: slow Texture: fine 1.This document is Fact Sheet FPS-123, one of a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Palm Buyers Guide Phil Only
    Palm Buyer’s Guide These suggestions are for Southern California. Please investigate the best species for your area. Tall Palms for Full Sun Medium Palms for Full Sun Short Palms for Full Sun Above 30-35 Feet of Height 15 to 30 Feet of Height 5 to 15 Feet of Height Acrocomia species Acoelorrhaphe wrightii Hyophorbe sp. other Allagoptera species Archontophoenix species Arenga species Kentiopsis oliviformis Arenga engleri Arenga pinnata Beccariophoenix species Livistona chinensis Brahea dulcis , decum- Carpentaria species (in tropical areas) Bismarckia nobilis Livistona decipiens, others bens and others Nannorrhops ritchiana Caryota, some single trunk species Brahea armata Chamaerops cerifera Ceroxylon species Phoenix, some species Brahea species other Polyandrococos caudescens Chamaerops h. dwarfs Clinostigma species Butia capitata, others Pritchardia, some species Coccothrinax, some sp. Jubaea chilensis Chamaerops humilis Pseudophoenix sargentii Dypsis lutescens (coast) Livistona, some species Chambeyronia (coastal) Ptychosperma e. (coastal) Dypsis, some species Parajubaea species Coccothrinax species Ravenea glauca, others Hyophorbe (bottle palm) Phoenix, some species Copernicia species Rhopalostylis s. (coastal) Phoenix roebelinii Ravenea, some species Dypsis decaryi Sabal, some species Pritchardia, dwarf sp. Roystonea species Dypsis species, various Syagrus botryophora Ravenea hildebrandtii Syagrus coronata, others Sabal, some species Euterpe edulis Rhapidophyllum hystrix Thrinax species Syagrus, some species like oleracea & sancona
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of American Science 2015;11(9)
    Journal of American Science 2015;11(9) http://www.jofamericanscience.org Comparative Investigation of Minerals, Amino acids, Lipoidal Contents and General Analysis of Chamaerops humilis L. Organs Growing in Egypt Shimaa A.Ahmed1, Hossam M. Hassan2, Sayed A. Ahmed1* and Ahmed H. Elghandour1. 1Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni- Seuf, 62514, Egypt. 2Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62514, Egypt. [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: In this paper, a comparison of nutritional value of the pollen grains and the fruits of chamaerops humilis L. and comparison of lipoidal content of the pollen grains, the fruits and the leaves was carried out. The preliminary phytochemical screening of the petroleum ether extracts of different organs of chamaerops humilis (L) revealed that the petroleum ether of the leaf, the pollen grain, the fruit are rich in lipid content and sterols and/or triterpenes. Total protein, fats, ash, carbohydrates and moisture percentages were determined in pollen grains and fruits. Minerals analysis show that Potassium was the major composition of macro-elements in both organs followed by sodium. [Shimaa A. Ahmed, Hossam M. Hassan, Sayed A. Ahmed and Ahmed H. Elghandour. Comparative Investigation of Minerals, Amino acids, Lipoidal Contents and General Analysis of Chamaerops humilis L. Organs Growing in Egypt. J Am Sci 2015;11(9):94-100]. (ISSN: 1545-1003). http://www.jofamericanscience.org. 13 Keywords: Chamaerops humilis L., pollen grains, Phytochemical investigation, lipoidal, sterols. 1. Introduction 2. Material and Methods Arecaceae family are flowering plants. Plant material Arecaceae family (palm family) have been important Samples of chamaerops humilis L.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 Palms & Cycads Cabbage Palm, Florida Sabal Dwarf Palmetto
    Cabbage Palm, Florida Sabal Sabal palmetto Palms & Cycads Hardy – Survives freezes • Evergreen palm 50 ft x 10-15 ft Half-hardy – killed at 20º • Sun/part shade Tender - killed by mild freeze • Low water • Slow growing KEY: • Native to SE US Provides food for butterflies • Salt tolerant Provides food & nesting for hummingbirds • Deer resistant Provides food, cover, or nesting for birds • Hardy to 16º Dwarf Palmetto Foxtail Palm Sabal minor Wodyetia bifurcata • Evergreen shrub 7 ft x 5 ft • Evergreen palm 30 ft x 20 ft • Part shade/shade • Sun/part shade • Low - high water • Sand, clay • Medium water • Tender – Hardy to 31º • Native to TX • Seed is poisonous • Hardy to 7º • Soil adaptable • Salt tolerant • Native to Australia • Deer resistant • Moderate to fast growing • Disease resistant • Salt tolerant • Resistant to lethal yellowing disease Lady Palm Mediterranean Rhapis excelsa Fan Palm • Evergreen palm Chamaerops humilis 12 ft x 12 ft • Clump-forming evergreen • Shade/part shade palm • Medium water 15 ft x 10 ft • Do not over-water • Sun/part shade • Prefers acid soils • Low water • Slow growing • Widely soil adaptable • Native to SE • Slow growing China • Native to Mediterranean • Hardy to 20 Sea basin • Hardy to 10° • Salt tolerant 27 Mexican Blue Hesper Palm Pindo Palm Brahea armata Butia capitata • Evergreen • Evergreen palm 50 ft x feather palm 16 ft 20 ft x 10 ft • Sun/light • Sun shade • Low water • Low water • Moderate • Needs good growth rate drainage • Edible fruit • Slow-growing • Native to Brazil • Native to MX • Salt
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Global Palm Distribution and Climate Tammo Reichgelt 1, Christopher K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The relation between global palm distribution and climate Tammo Reichgelt 1, Christopher K. West2 & David R. Greenwood 3 Fossil palms provide qualitative evidence of (sub-) tropical conditions and frost-free winters in the Received: 2 November 2017 geological past, including modern cold climate regions (e.g., boreal, or polar climates). The freeze Accepted: 7 March 2018 intolerance of palms varies across diferent organs and life stages, with seedlings in particular less Published: xx xx xxxx tolerant of sub-zero temperatures than adult plants, limiting successful establishment of populations while permitting adult palms to survive in cultivation outside their natural ranges. Quantitatively, palms indicate minimum cold month mean temperature (CMMT) at 2–8 °C in palaeoclimate reconstructions. These data have accentuated model-proxy mismatches for high latitudes during Paleogene hyperthermals when palms expanded poleward in both hemispheres. We constructed a manually fltered dataset of >20,000 georeferenced Arecaceae records, by eliminating cultivars. Statistically derived mean annual temperature, mean annual temperature range, and CMMT thresholds for the Arecaceae and lower rank subfamilies and tribes reveal large diferences in temperature sensitivity depending on lower taxonomic classifcation. Cold tolerant tribes such as the Trachycarpeae produce thresholds as low as CMMT ≥ 2.2 °C. However, within the palm family, CMMT < 5 °C is anomalous. Moreover, palm expansion into temperate biomes is likely a post-Palaeogene event. We recognize a CMMT ≥ 5.2 °C threshold for the palm family, unless a lower taxonomic rank can be assigned. Reconstructing climates of the geological past, particular temperature, is of considerable interest for understand- 1–4 ing climates under higher than present-day atmospheric CO2 levels (pCO2) .
    [Show full text]
  • Transplanting Specimen Palms
    WORKSHOP Transplanting [W.D. Young & Sons (Indio, Calif.) Time of year to transplant and Ellis Farms (Borrego Springs, Ca- and seasonality of palm root Specimen Palms: lif.); unpublished]. They are typically dug and removed from one landscape growth A Review of site or a nursery fi eld, transported by The most common recommen- truck, and replanted at another site to dation and SIP is to transplant palms Common Practices create an instant mature landscape. during the warmer times of the year, Specimen palms are easy to trans- ideally in late spring or early summer, and Research-based plant compared to large, broad-leaved, because a long growing season is dicotyledonous and coniferous trees, available for regeneration of the root Information which are characterized by large, system (Donselman, 1991; Hodel, multi-branched, woody root systems. 1995, 1996, 1997; Meerow, 1997). 1 A relatively small root ball is neces- However, the landscape industries Dennis R. Pittenger , sary when transplanting most palms of southern California and other Donald R. Hodel2, and because, as arborescent monocots, areas of the southwestern U.S. have they have an adventitious root system been transplanting hardy palms, like A. James Downer3 composed of numerous, simple, fi brous mediterranean fan palm (Chamaerops primary roots that arise independently humilis), canary island date palm (Phoe- and periodically from the root initia- nix canariensis), date palm (Phoenix ADDITIONAL INDEX WORDS. root growth, transpiration, leaf removal tion zone (RIZ) (Fig. 1) at the base
    [Show full text]
  • Trachycarpus Fortunei in PALM BEACH COUNTY
    GROWING Trachycarpus fortunei IN PALM BEACH COUNTY Submitted by Charlie Beck Trachycarpus fortunei is native to central and eastern China. It is also found in Japan and Myanmar but these populations are thought to be introduced. This palm is widely cultivated, so the exact location of its origin is unknown. T. fortunei is typically found between elevations of 300-7800’ in areas of cool wet summers and cold, often snowy, winters. It is considered to be the most cold hardy palm with an upright stem. Its common name is the Windmill Palm. T. fortunei is a palmate, medium sized palm. It’s closely related to Chamaerops, the European Fan Palm. It can grow 45’ tall on 10” diameter stems. In habitat, leaves measure 3’ across and petioles measure 2’ long. Petioles are not spiny. Stems are covered with persistent dark brown fiber. Thin ribbon-like ligules emerge with the new leaf. Fronds are not self-cleaning, so it can form a shag of dried leaves. Some drooping of leaf tips might occur, but T. fortunei var. ‘Wagnerianus’ (formerly T. wagnerianus) has very stiff leaf tips and smaller fronds and shorter petioles. This variety has slightly glaucous leaf underside. T. fortunei is considered a dioecious palm. This palm was first brought to Europe in 1830 and became extensively cultivated throughout temperate and subtropical areas. Beautiful specimens grow outdoors in unlikely countries such as United Kingdom, Denmark, and Switzerland. In North America it grows on the west coast from San Diego to British Columbia. It’s planted outdoors at the Missouri Botanical Garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Garden History Plant Lists
    Southern Plant Lists Southern Garden History Society A Joint Project With The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation September 2000 1 INTRODUCTION Plants are the major component of any garden, and it is paramount to understanding the history of gardens and gardening to know the history of plants. For those interested in the garden history of the American south, the provenance of plants in our gardens is a continuing challenge. A number of years ago the Southern Garden History Society set out to create a ‘southern plant list’ featuring the dates of introduction of plants into horticulture in the South. This proved to be a daunting task, as the date of introduction of a plant into gardens along the eastern seaboard of the Middle Atlantic States was different than the date of introduction along the Gulf Coast, or the Southern Highlands. To complicate maters, a plant native to the Mississippi River valley might be brought in to a New Orleans gardens many years before it found its way into a Virginia garden. A more logical project seemed to be to assemble a broad array plant lists, with lists from each geographic region and across the spectrum of time. The project’s purpose is to bring together in one place a base of information, a data base, if you will, that will allow those interested in old gardens to determine the plants available and popular in the different regions at certain times. This manual is the fruition of a joint undertaking between the Southern Garden History Society and the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. In choosing lists to be included, I have been rather ruthless in expecting that the lists be specific to a place and a time.
    [Show full text]
  • GROWING Saribus Rotundifolius in PALM BEACH COUNTY
    GROWING Saribus rotundifolius IN PALM BEACH COUNTY Submitted by Charlie Beck Saribus rotundifolius was first described and named Corypha rotundifolia in 1786. Since that time it was renamed many times. Throughout the years the genus was changed from Corypha to Licuala, Livistona, Chamaerops, back to Livistona (five different species), and then in 2011 was renamed Saribus rotundifolius which is its current classification. The genus Saribus was resurrected to include 8 former Livistona species and Pritchardiopsis jeanneneyi. The reclassification was based on molecular and morphological data such as differences in inflorescences, epidermis cells and fibers. What amazes me the most is that Saribus is more closely related to Pholidocarpus, Licuala and Johannesteijsmannia than to the remaining species of Livistona. Saribus rotundifolius is considered a variable species with a wide distribution throughout Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Its conservation status is “least concern.” It is found at elevations of 0-1,000 feet. Native habitat straddles the equator ranging from 18°N to 10°S. Annual rainfall can be as high as 160 inches. That’s 2-1/2 times the average annual rainfall in West Palm Beach. S. rotundifolius is usually found in wet locations including swamp forest, mangrove margins, rainforest, and along river courses. S. rotundifolius is a solitary palm. In habitat they can emerge from the forest canopy and reach heights up to 150 feet. There’s little chance of it growing that tall in Palm Beach County. This is a medium sized palm not much larger than the common Chinese Fan Palm, Livistona chinensis. S. rotundifolius has large round costapalmate fronds that can measure up to 7’ across.
    [Show full text]