Become the Face of Your Farm
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Farmer Willingness to Supply Poultry Litter for Energy Conversion and to Invest in an Energy Conversion Cooperative
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 42,1(February 2010):105–119 Ó 2010 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Farmer Willingness to Supply Poultry Litter for Energy Conversion and to Invest in an Energy Conversion Cooperative Kimberly L. Jensen, Roland K. Roberts, Ernie Bazen, R. Jamey Menard, and Burton C. English* Conversion of poultry litter to energy can serve as a renewable energy source and provide an alternative to land application in areas where poultry production is intensive. Economies of size may limit a farmer’s ability to economically use on-farm conversion. Capital costs can be spread across several poultry farmers to convert poultry litter to energy in a centralized fa- cility. This research determined influences on the amount of litter poultry producers will to sell to a centralized conversion facility, on their willingness to invest in a conversion co- operative, and on the prices for litter required to divert litter from current uses. Key Words: poultry litter, supply, renewable energy JEL Classifications: Q12, Q13 Increases in energy costs, with energy costs considered renewable energy. The U.S. De- comprising over half of cash expenses for partment of Energy (DOE) includes bioenergy, poultry producers (Cunningham, 2008), cou- or energy from biomass, as a source of re- pled with a desire for sustainable production newable energy and includes animal wastes in practices, highlight the need to investigate the its definition of biomass that can be used to use of poultry litter as a potential energy feed- generate renewable energy (DOE, 2009). Sec- stock. Poultry litter, the bedding and waste ma- ond, conversion of litter to electricity can pro- terials removed from poultry houses, can serve vide an alternative use for the litter in areas as an energy feedstock for heating and elec- where poultry production is intensive and litter tricity generation either in on-farm systems or supplies exceed the fertilizer needs on nearby in centralized litter-to-energy conversion fa- farmlands. -
The Greening of Louisiana's Economy: the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing
Increasing Employment in Mississippi The Greening of Mississippi’s Economy: the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Sector August 2011 greenjobs.mdes.ms.gov In 2009, Mississippi and Louisiana partnered to research economic development opportunities and workforce needs associated with the region’s green economy. Through a $2.3 million grant from the U.S. Department of Labor, a consortium of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security, Mississippi State University, Louisiana Workforce Commission, and Louisiana State University conducted an extensive study of economic activity that is beneficial to the environment. This and other research products were developed as part of that effort. “This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The solution was created by the grantee and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on linked sites and including, but not limited to, accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability, or ownership. This solution is copyrighted by the institution that created it. Internal use by an organization and/or personal use by an individual for non-commercial purposes is permissible. All other uses require the prior authorization of the copyright owner.” Equal Opportunity Employer/Program Auxiliary aids and services available upon request to individuals with disabilities: TTY 800-582-2233 i Table of Contents Description of Sector ....................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the Green Component of the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Sector ... -
Market Garden Is Open to the Public Tuesday Through Sunday from April Through October
JMG Horticulturist & Landscape Designer since 1999: Susan Sipos Weather permitting, Jefferson Market Garden is open to the public Tuesday through Sunday from April through October. Jefferson Market To learn more about Jefferson Market Garden, contact us at: Jefferson Market Garden 70A Greenwich Avenue PMB 372 New York, NY 10011-8358 Email: [email protected] Publication created by www.jeffersonmarketgarden.org Map: George Colbert Photographs: Laurie Moody, Bill Thomas, Linda Camardo Publication Design: Anne LaFond, Partnerships for Parks © 2014 facebook.com/jeffersonmarketgarden JefferSOn MArkeT GArden on Greenwich JOIn US! BeCOMe A frIend Of THe GArden! Avenue between Sixth Avenue and West 10th Street Jefferson Market Garden belongs to everyone. is a lush oasis in the heart of Greenwich Village, Whether you visit once a year, once a week or one of Manhattan’s great historic neighborhoods. every day, the Garden will be enriched by your The Garden and the neighboring public library are participation. Although New York City retains both named for an open farmers market located there in the early 19th century and leveled in 1873 ownership of the land through the NYC Department to make room for an ornate Victorian courthouse of Parks and Recreation, the Garden’s upkeep is the designed by Vaux and Withers. responsibility of a community group of volunteers. In 1931, a prison, The Women’s House of Detention, Gardens are fragile and require constant attention was built. In the 60’s when the City threatened to and renewal. Your contributions enable the Garden’s demolish the courthouse, the community organized plants, shrubs, and trees to be maintained in to save it for use as a public library and then splendid seasonal bloom. -
ANIMAL AGRICULTURE: Waste Management Practices GAO/RCED-99-205
United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Tom Harkin, GAO Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate July 1999 ANIMAL AGRICULTURE Waste Management Practices GAO/RCED-99-205 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-282871 July 26, 1999 The Honorable Tom Harkin Ranking Minority Member Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry United States Senate Dear Senator Harkin: The production of livestock and poultry animals, also known as animal agriculture, is important to the economic well-being of the nation, producing $98.8 billion per year in farm revenue. This production also contributes to the viability of many rural communities and the sustainability of an adequate food supply for the American public. However, concern over pollution resulting from intensive livestock and poultry production—in which large numbers of animals are held in confined production facilities—has increased in recent years. Nationwide, about 130 times more animal waste1 is produced than human waste—roughly 5 tons for every U.S. citizen—and some operations with hundreds of thousands of animals produce as much waste as a town or a city.2 These large volumes of waste threaten surface water and groundwater quality in the event of waste spills, leakage from waste storage facilities, and runoff from fields on which an excessive amount of waste has been applied as fertilizer. Furthermore, as animal production is increasingly concentrated in larger operations and in certain regions of the country, commonly used animal waste management practices may no longer be adequate for preventing water pollution. -
American-Flowers-Week-In-August
Red, white and bloom American Flowers Week local flower promotions sparkle American Flowers Week (June 28- July 4) is an all-inclusive, virtual promo- tion campaign designed to engage the public, policymakers and the media in a conversation about the origins of their flowers. As an advocacy effort, the cam- paign coincides with America’s Indepen- dence Day on July 4th, providing florists, retailers, wholesalers and flower farmers a patriotic opportunity to promote Ameri- can grown flowers. American Flowers Week supporters can find more information and resources at americanflowersweek.com. Downloadable fact sheets, infographics, logos and social media badges are available for growers and florists to use for marketing and promotion efforts. Participants are encouraged to use the social media at @americanflowersweek to help spread the word about this campaign across all platforms. Above left: An American Flowers Week pop-up flower bar by farmer-florist Whitney Muncy of Evansville, Indi- ana-based Emerald Design, at White Swan Coffee Lab. Below left: American Flowers Week branding on the flowers at the pop-up. Photos by Patton Photography. By Debra Prinzing The survey, sponsored in part by Slow Flowers Society, found that four in 10 U.S. adults (41 percent, 104.6 mil- Slow Flowers Society launched American Flowers lion) reported spending some amount of money on cut Week (AFW) in 2015 as a community-focused floral flowers in 2020, with an average household expenditure of holiday, encouraging everyone in the floral marketplace to $62.63, or an estimated $6.55 billion spent by U.S. house- participate — from flower seed and bulb producers to cut holds last year. -
Colonial Garden Plants
COLONIAL GARD~J~ PLANTS I Flowers Before 1700 The following plants are listed according to the names most commonly used during the colonial period. The botanical name follows for accurate identification. The common name was listed first because many of the people using these lists will have access to or be familiar with that name rather than the botanical name. The botanical names are according to Bailey’s Hortus Second and The Standard Cyclopedia of Horticulture (3, 4). They are not the botanical names used during the colonial period for many of them have changed drastically. We have been very cautious concerning the interpretation of names to see that accuracy is maintained. By using several references spanning almost two hundred years (1, 3, 32, 35) we were able to interpret accurately the names of certain plants. For example, in the earliest works (32, 35), Lark’s Heel is used for Larkspur, also Delphinium. Then in later works the name Larkspur appears with the former in parenthesis. Similarly, the name "Emanies" appears frequently in the earliest books. Finally, one of them (35) lists the name Anemones as a synonym. Some of the names are amusing: "Issop" for Hyssop, "Pum- pions" for Pumpkins, "Mushmillions" for Muskmellons, "Isquou- terquashes" for Squashes, "Cowslips" for Primroses, "Daffadown dillies" for Daffodils. Other names are confusing. Bachelors Button was the name used for Gomphrena globosa, not for Centaurea cyanis as we use it today. Similarly, in the earliest literature, "Marygold" was used for Calendula. Later we begin to see "Pot Marygold" and "Calen- dula" for Calendula, and "Marygold" is reserved for Marigolds. -
History of the Flower Garden: the Garden Takes Shape by Caroline Burgess, Director
News from Stonecrop GardenFall 2008s History of the Flower Garden: The Garden Takes Shape by Caroline Burgess, Director Stonecrop grew literally and figuratively out of its spec- tacular albeit challenging site atop a rocky and windswept hill, surrounded by close woods and long, pastoral views down the Hudson Valley. Like all cultivated landscapes, Stonecrop, however, is just as much an expression of the ideas and aspirations of the people who create and inhabit it as the native landscape from whence it sprang. Frank Cabot’s three-part series of articles which appeared previ- ously in our newsletter beautifully documents this process of accommodating both man and nature, telling of the early years he and his family spent at Stonecrop. In this new series, I will continue the tale, using the story of our Flower Garden to illustrate the garden-making process at Stonecrop during my tenure. An Englishwoman by birth, I arrived in the United States as the Director of Stonecrop Gardens in 1984 following the completion of my three-year Diploma in Horticulture at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. As Caroline Burgess at Barnsley House a child, I worked in a stable near my family’s home in exchange for the privilege of riding the horses. That stable sequence of surrounding spaces and views. One enters belonged to Rosemary Verey and it wasn’t long before I the house (and now the Flower Garden) through a simple was working as a gardener and later the head gardener yet elegant turf and gravel courtyard ringed in trees. in her acclaimed gardens at Barnsley House. -
The NAT ION AL
The NAT ION A L HORTICUL TURAL MAGAZINE JANUARY -- - 1928 The American Horticultural Society A Union of The National Horticultural Society and The American Horticultural Society, at Washington, D. C. Devoted to the popularizing of all phases of Horticulture: Ornamental Gardening, including Landscape Gardening and Amateur Flower Gar:dening; Professional Flower Gardening or Floriculture; Vegetable Gardening; Fruit Growing and all activities allied with Horticulture. PRESENT ROLL OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS March 1, 1927 OFFICERS President, F. L. Mulford, 2552 Tunlaw Road, Washington, D. C. First Vice-President, Mrs. Fannie Mahood Heath, Grand Forks, N. D. Second Vice-President, H. A. Fiebing, Milwaukee, Wis. Secretary, D. Victor Lumsden, 1629 Columbia Road N. W., Washington, D. C. Treasurer, Otto Bauer, 1216 H Street N. W., Washington, D. C. DIRECTORS TERM EXPIRING IN 1928 Mrs. Pearl Frazer, Grand Forks, N. D. David Lumsden, Battery Park, Bethesda, Md. J. Marion Shull, 207 Raymond Street, Chevy Chase, Md. Hamilton Traub, University Farm, St. Paul, Minn. A. L. Truax, Crosby, N. D. TERM EXPIRING IN 1929 G. E. Anderson, Twin Oaks, Woodley Road, Washington, D. C. Mrs. L. H. Fowler, Kenilworth, D. C. V. E. Grotlisch, Woodside Park, Silver Spring, Md. Joseph J. Lane, 19 W. 44th Street, New York City. O. H. Schroeder, Faribault, Minn. Editorial Committee: B. Y. Morrison, Chairman; Sherman R. Duffy, V. E. Grotlisch, P. L. Ricker, J. Marion Shull, John P. Schumacher, Hamilton Traub. Entered as seoond-ola•• matter Maroh 22, 1927, at the Post Offioe a.t Washington, D. C" under the Act of August 24, 1912. 2 THE NATIONAL HORTICULTURAL MAGAZINE Jan. -
Most Appropriate Measures for Reducing Ammonia Emissions in Latvia’S Pig and Poultry Housing
Agronomy Research 17(3), 797–805, 2019 https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.047 Most appropriate measures for reducing ammonia emissions in Latvia’s pig and poultry housing J. Priekulis1, L. Melece2,* and A. Laurs1 1Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Agriculture Mashinery J.Čakstes bulv.6, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia 2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Department of Economics, Struktoru str. 14, LV-1039, Riga, Latvia *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract. New goals of ammonia emissions reduction for each of EU Member State, including Latvia, were approved by the EU Directive 2016/2284/EU ‘on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants’. Agriculture sector, particularly livestock farming, is the main source of these emissions. Besides, the implementation of modern or intensive animal rearing/breeding technologies causes the increase of emissions in Latvia. Therefore, more effective ammonia abatement measures or techniques should be chosen for implementation in Latvia to reach the objectives. The description and benefits of such measures are provided in the guidelines and recommendations developed and approved by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the European Commission. However, all of these recommendations are not applicable in Latvia. Therefore, the aim of research was to find most appropriate ammonia emissions abatement measures for pig and poultry farming in Latvia. The study was focused on the intensive pig and poultry farming, particularly animal housing. Evaluation or assessment of most appropriate ammonia emissions’ reduction measures was conducted using an expert method. The results of the study indicate that it is possible to ensure reduction of ammonia emissions by comparatively simple and less expensive options that could be more or less easy implemented (e.g. -
A Guide to Poultry Litter Use in Louisiana Rice Production
A Guide to Poultry Litter Use in Louisiana Rice Production A loss of production on recently precision-leveled rice bedding materials used in commercial broiler houses include fields in a rice-crawfish-rice rotation has become a common wood shavings, rice hulls and sawdust. As the bedding mate- occurrence in commercial Louisiana rice production. This is rial is used it forms a hard layer on the surface often referred especially true on mechanically altered silt loam soils of the to as a cake. This cake can be removed (decaked) after one coastal plains found in southwest Louisiana. flock has been grown or can be removed after several flocks The use of poultry litter on unproductive areas has in- have been grown, depending on the management practices creased productivity levels in many cases above those realized of the producer. Therefore, nutritive value of litter is not prior to precision-leveling. The use of litter in conjunction constant between sources. The nutrient content can vary with inorganic fertilizers also has been reported to improve considerably depending on the bedding material used, num- yields above those found when using inorganic fertilizers ber of flocks grown between decaking, feed source and feed alone. Research in organic fertilizers such as poultry litter in efficiency, bird type, management practices and whether the southwest Louisiana rice production has been neglected in litter has been composted or is fresh. This variability makes the past because transportation and application costs have it imperative that every delivered batch of litter be tested to traditionally exceeded the nutritional benefit of the poultry determine the nutrient and water content. -
Growing Fruit for Home Use
MS-18 revised 2003 Growing Fruit for Home Use John Avery, Patrick Byers, Martin Kaps, Laszlo Kovacs, and Marilyn Odneal Edited by Marilyn Odneal State Fruit Experiment Station Missouri State University Mountain Grove State Fruit Experiment Station MS-18 revised 2003 Growing Fruit for Home Use John Avery, Patrick Byers, Martin Kaps, Laszlo Kovacs, and Marilyn Odneal Edited by Marilyn Odneal Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Calendar of Events in the Home Fruit Planting ............................................................... 10 Glossary of Fruit Production Terms ................................................................................ 11 Apples .................................................................................................................. 13 Pears .................................................................................................................. 18 Stone Fruits .................................................................................................................. 20 Strawberries ................................................................................................................. 24 Grapes .................................................................................................................. 29 Raspberries and Blackberries....................................................................................... 34 Highbush Blueberries ................................................................................................... -
Fruitful Lessons from the World Leader in Kiwifruit Zespri CEO Lain Jager
Agora Group A fish out of water The Rarest Rose Award-winning Avalanche An exclusive interview Florist Neill Strain Floral Couture March-April 2017 Be Fashion, The Future of Horticulture: Not Victim Creating a Culture of Quality Fruitful Lessons From the world leader in kiwifruit Zespri CEO Lain Jager It’s time to be EXTRAORDINARY Inspired by nature and re-imagined by Danziger, there’s nothing ordinary about Scoop™. With its perfectly spherical flowers, and exquisite color palette, Scoop™ will spark imaginations in every arrangement and bouquet. SCOOP™ Scabiosa www.danziger.co.il | Preface Contents Minds Facts, 24 Figures, FloraCulture International Fruitful elcome to the new-look FloraCulture Lessons International, your gateway to global From the world leader W ornamental horticulture. In a constantly changing world FCI is moving with the times, keeping in kiwifruit you up to date with the consequences changes have on the horticultural sector. If we want the ornamental horticulture to bloom it’s essential to bring people, What could the flower industry learn from Zespri, markets, cultures and knowledge together. FCI helps a New Zealand group of kiwi growers? Zespri has been you to do this. successful on aspects like differentiation, branding, The new FCI has 2 pillars: Each issue will have a theme marketing and a steady quality policy. That’s why FCI and we will highlight a different continent, giving specific attention to a country and city therein. gladly gives the floor to Zespri CEO Lain Jager. In this issue we will focus on various aspects of quality, something Zestri’s CEO knows all about considering 30 Up close his monumental success.