DOCSLIB.ORG

Study of Freshwater Ecosystem Services in Croatia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Study of Freshwater Ecosystem Services in Croatia April, 2014 Carried out by: Dr. Sc. David Pithart MSc Ivana Petrov Rančić Petra Kutleša Aljoša Duplić IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK The project National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Croatia is being implemented over a period of two years (from 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2014). The Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Nature Protection Directorate (MENP) is the government institution responsible for the implementation of the project and will act as the Executing Agency. The main implementing partner of the Ministry is the State Institute for Nature Protection (SINP), which is the central institution carrying out expert tasks of nature protection in Croatia. UNDP is involved as the GEF Agency for the project, and it is accountable to the GEF for the use of funds. The project is nationally implemented (NIM). The project National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Croatia builds on the current status and achievements of Croatia with respect to its obligations vis-à-vis the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), in particular the country’s biodiversity planning and Convention reporting processes, and its commitment to implement, at the national level, the CBD’s Strategic Plan for the period 2011-2020. The concept of ecosystem services that is directly connected to the Aichi Targets 14 and 15 of CBD, as well as the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy, are still quite new for Croatia. Since 2013, three projects in Croatia were dealing with the economic valuation of biodiversity, where ecosystem services were used as a tool for sustainable management of nature protected areas (in Nature Park Vransko jezero and Nature Park Velebit), or for sustainable rural development. However, the concepts of “non-market forest functions” have been used in the forestry sector from the 1990s, as concepts in which the ecological and social benefits of the forest ecosystem were recognized and used in order to ensure sustainable forestry management. This topic has also been indirectly integrated in NBSAP 2008, within the chapters dedicated to the protection of biodiversity and sustainable use of natural resources (strategic objectives and action plans for cooperation with the sectors of agriculture, forestry, hunting, fishing, water management and tourism). The Study for Freshwater Ecosystem Services (SFES), as a component of the project National Biodiversity Planning to Support the Implementation of the CBD 2011-2020 Strategic Plan in Croatia, constitutes the first institutional initiative related to the assessment of biodiversity values and economic valuation of ecosystem services. It should provide arguments for the protection of freshwater ecosystems, based not only on their biodiversity, but also on other benefits that such ecosystems provide for human society or for the stability of the global ecosystem. These benefits should also be evaluated from the perspective of the economy. 2 Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Concept of ecosystem services in ecosystem evaluation ....................................................... 5 1.2. Values of floodplain ecosystems ............................................................................................. 6 1.3. Background reasons for the ecosystem services study ........................................................... 8 2. Character, values and threats of Drava, Sava and Danube floodplains (DSDF) .................................. 9 2.1. Floodplain ecosystems of the Drava, Sava and Danube basin ................................................ 9 2.2. Sava, Drava and Danube floodplains and nature protection ................................................ 12 2.3. Evaluation of Drava, Sava and Danube floodplains ............................................................... 13 2.4. Threats to Drava, Sava and Danube floodplains ................................................................... 14 3. Study area delimitation ................................................................................................................. 17 3.1. Drava, Sava and Danube floodplains (DSDF) ......................................................................... 17 3.2. Pilot study area (PSA) ............................................................................................................ 21 3.3. Alternative scenarios for ES evaluation in PSA ...................................................................... 41 3.2.1. State as-is ........................................................................................................................... 41 3.2.2. State with hydropower accumulations ............................................................................... 42 3.3.3. State of sustainable use ...................................................................................................... 42 4. Meetings with relevant stakeholders and experts ............................................................................ 43 5. Ecosystem services of DSDF and PSA ................................................................................................ 46 5.1. Identification of relevant ecosystem services ....................................................................... 46 5.2. Evaluation of particular ecosystem services ......................................................................... 47 5.2.1. Regulating ecosystem services ........................................................................................... 47 5.2.1.1. Flood mitigation .................................................................................................... 47 5.2.1.2. Nutrient retention ................................................................................................. 56 5.2.1.3. Carbon sequestration ............................................................................................ 60 5.2.2. Supporting ecosystem services ..................................................................................... 61 5.2.2.1. Habitat provision .......................................................................................................... 61 5.2.3. Provisioning services ........................................................................................................... 73 5.2.3.1. Wood production ......................................................................................................... 73 5.2.3.2. Fish provision ................................................................................................................ 80 5.2.3.3. Game animals provision ............................................................................................... 87 5.2.3.4. Drinking water provision .............................................................................................. 90 5.2.3.5. Gold provision (Gold prospecting, placer mining) ........................................................ 95 3 5.2.3.6. Sand and gravel provision........................................................................................... 96 5.2.4. Cultural services ............................................................................................................ 97 5.2.4.1. Recreation/tourism ...................................................................................................... 97 5.2.4.2. Art inspiration ............................................................................................................. 104 6. Incentives important for support and strengthening of ecosystem services in DSDF ................ 111 7. Summary and conclusions ........................................................................................................... 115 Literature ............................................................................................................................................. 119 LIST OF ACRONYMS CBD – Convention on Biological Diversity CICES - Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services DSDF – Drava, Sava and Danube Floodplains ES – Ecosystem services GEF – Global Environment Facility HEP – Hrvatska elektroprivreda d.o.o. HEPP – Hydroelectric Power Plant MAES – Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services MAB – Man and Biosphere Reserve MENP – Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection MHS – Multipurpose Hydropower System Osijek NBSAP – National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan NIM – Nationally implemented PAHPP North – Production Area Hydropower Plants North PSA – Pilot Study Area rkm – River kilometre SEE River – SFES – Study of Freshwater Ecosystem Services SINP – State Institute for Nature Protection TEEB – The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity TN – Total nitrogen TP – Total phosphorus UNESCO – The United Nations Organization for Education, Science and Culture UNDP – United Nations Development Programme VHS Osijek – Višenamjenski hidroenergetski sustav Osijek WFD – Water Framework Directive WMS – Web Map Server 4 1. Introduction 1.1. Concept of ecosystem services in ecosystem evaluation Increasing damage and devastation of natural ecosystems and the consequential loss of their functions, perceived as a disbalance of natural processes – e.g. the hydrological cycle or nutrient cycles and loss of their productivity – has led to
Recommended publications
  • FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Journal Volume VII No. 1-2 1999

    FEEFHS Quarterly A Journal of Central & Bast European Genealogical Studies FEEFHS Quarterly Volume 7, nos. 1-2 FEEFHS Quarterly Who, What and Why is FEEFHS? Tue Federation of East European Family History Societies Editor: Thomas K. Ecllund. [email protected] (FEEFHS) was founded in June 1992 by a small dedicated group Managing Editor: Joseph B. Everett. [email protected] of American and Canadian genealogists with diverse ethnic, reli- Contributing Editors: Shon Edwards gious, and national backgrounds. By the end of that year, eleven Daniel Schlyter societies bad accepted its concept as founding members. Each year Emily Schulz since then FEEFHS has doubled in size. FEEFHS nows represents nearly two hundred organizations as members from twenty-four FEEFHS Executive Council: states, five Canadian provinces, and fourteen countries. lt contin- 1998-1999 FEEFHS officers: ues to grow. President: John D. Movius, c/o FEEFHS (address listed below). About half of these are genealogy societies, others are multi-pur- [email protected] pose societies, surname associations, book or periodical publish- 1st Vice-president: Duncan Gardiner, C.G., 12961 Lake Ave., ers, archives, libraries, family history centers, on-line services, in- Lakewood, OH 44107-1533. [email protected] stitutions, e-mail genealogy list-servers, heraldry societies, and 2nd Vice-president: Laura Hanowski, c/o Saskatchewan Genealogi- other ethnic, religious, and national groups. FEEFHS includes or- cal Society, P.0. Box 1894, Regina, SK, Canada S4P 3EI ganizations representing all East or Central European groups that [email protected] have existing genealogy societies in North America and a growing 3rd Vice-president: Blanche Krbechek, 2041 Orkla Drive, group of worldwide organizations and individual members, from Minneapolis, MN 55427-3429.
  • Službeni Glasnik Koprivničko-Križevačke Županije

    Službeni Glasnik Koprivničko-Križevačke Županije

    SLUŽBENI GLASNIK KOPRIVNIČKO-KRIŽEVAČKE ŽUPANIJE 2020. BROJ: 8 - Godina XXVIII. Koprivnica, 16. travnja 2020. ISSN 1333-6398 KOPRIVNIČKO- KRIŽEVAČKA ŽUPANIJA AKTI ŽUPANA 35. Na temelju članka 2. stavka 1. i članka 11. 1. Gradska vjenčaonica Grada Koprivnice na stavka 3. Pravilnika o mjerilima za određivanje iznosa adresi Koprivnica, Zrinski trg 1 za Matični ured i namjeni naknade ostvarene za sklapanje životnog Koprivnica sa matičnim područjima Koprivnica, partnerstva izvan službene prostorije („Narodne Sokolovac, Rasinja i Novigrad Podravski novine“, broj 36/20.), članka 55. Statuta Koprivničko - kojima pripadaju naselja na području Grada križevačke županije („Službeni glasnik Koprivničko - Koprivnice i općina Koprivnički Ivanec, križevačke županije“ broj 7/13., 14/13., 9/15., 11/15. - Koprivnički Bregi, Sokolovac, Rasinja, pročišćeni tekst, 2/18. i 3/18. – pročišćeni tekst i Novigrad Podravski i Hlebine, 4/20.) i članka 39. stavka 4. Kolektivnog ugovora za 2. Gradska vjenčaonica Grada Križevaca na službenike i namještenike u upravnim tijelima adresi Križevci, Ivana Zakmardija Koprivničko-križevačke županije („Službeni glasnik Dijankovečkog 3 za Matični ured Križevci, Koprivničko-križevačke županije“ broj 3/20. i 7/20.), Matični ured Sveti Petar Orehovec i Matični župan Koprivničko - križevačke županije 16. travnja ured Sveti Ivan Žabno sa matičnim područjima 2020. godine donio je Križevci, Raven, Glogovnica, Sveti Petar Čvrstec, Sveti Petar Orehovec, Gornja Rijeka i ODLUKU Sveti Ivan Žabno kojima pripadaju naselja na o određivanju službenih
  • Službeni Glasnik Koprivni Čko-Križeva Čke Županije

    Službeni Glasnik Koprivni Čko-Križeva Čke Županije

    SLUŽBENI GLASNIK KOPRIVNI ČKO-KRIŽEVA ČKE ŽUPANIJE 2014. BROJ: 6 - Godina XXII. Koprivnica, 29. svibnja 2014. ISSN 1333-6398 KOPRIVNI ČKO- KRIŽEVA ČKA ŽUPANIJA AKT UPRAVNOG ODJELA ZA POSLOVE ŽUPANIJSKE SKUPŠTINE, ŽUPANA I OP ĆE POSLOVE 2. Nakon izvršenog uspore ñivanja s izvornim Najpovoljniji ponuditelj je kandidat koji je tekstom utvr ñena je tiskarska pogreška u Odluci o ponudio najviši iznos zakupnine. uvjetima davanja u zakup poslovnog prostora u vlasništvu Op ćine Legrad (u daljnjem tekstu: Odluka) Članak 21. koja je objavljena u „Službenom glasniku Koprivni čko -križeva čke županije“ broj 8. od 12. srpnja 2010., na O postupku otvaranja ponuda vodi se zapisnik na čin da su izostavljena dva članka Odluke, te se na temelju koje se sklapa ugovor o zakupu. daje O rezultatima javnog natje čaja kandidati će biti obaviješteni u roku 8 dana od dana odabira ISPRAVAK - DOPUNA najpovoljnije ponude.“ U Odluci o uvjetima davanja u zakup poslovnog UPRAVNI ODJEL ZA POSLOVE ŽUPANIJSKE prostora u vlasništvu Op ćine Legrad („Službeni SKUPŠTINE, glasnik Koprivni čko-križeva čke županije“ broj 8/10.) ŽUPANA I OP ĆE POSLOVE iza članka 19. dodaju se članci 20. i 21. koji glase: KOPRIVNI ČKO-KRIŽEVA ČKE ŽUPANIJE „Članak 20. KLASA: 011-01/14-01/8 URBROJ: 2137/1-01/01-14-5 Kandidati koji su podnijeli ponude imaju pravo Koprivnica, 28. travnja 2014. prisustvovati otvaranju ponuda, a ako žele koristiti pravo prvenstva, tada moraju biti prisutni otvaranju PRO ČELNICA: ponuda i dati odgovaraju ću izjavu u smislu članka 17. Marina Horvat Pavlic, dipl. iur., v. r. stavka 2. ove Odluke. OP ĆINA DRNJE AKTI OP ĆINSKOG VIJE ĆA 7.
  • P166551-ASA-TF0A6563 Output Report on the Sava and Drina Corridor Integrated Development Program

    P166551-ASA-TF0A6563 Output Report on the Sava and Drina Corridor Integrated Development Program

    Public Disclosure Authorized 2018 P166551-ASA-TF0A6563 Output Report on the Sava and Drina Corridor Integrated Development Program Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Europe and Central Asia Water, Energy, Transport, Environment and SURR Global Practices 1 Sava - Drina River Corridor Integrated Development Program Conceptual Outline May 21, 2018 P166551-ASA-TF0A6563 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................3 A. COUNTRY AND REGIONAL CONTEXT .................................................................................................. 3 B. SECTORAL AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTEXT ........................................................................................... 5 C. RELATION TO WORLD BANK COUNTRY PARTNERSHIP FRAMEWORKS ...................................................... 9 2. PROPOSED PDO AND RESULTS ................................................................................................9 A. PROPOSED PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVE ............................................................................... 9 B. KEY RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 10 3. PROGRAM CONTEXT ........................................................................................................... 11 A. CONCEPT ..................................................................................................................................
  • University of Birmingham Challenges of River Basin Management: Current Status Of, and Prospects For, the River Danube from A

    University of Birmingham Challenges of River Basin Management: Current Status Of, and Prospects For, the River Danube from A

    University of Birmingham Challenges of river basin management: Current status of, and prospects for, the River Danube from a river engineering perspective Habersack, Helmut; Hein, Thomas; Stanica, Adrian; Liska, Igor; Mair, Raimund; Jager, Elisabeth; Hauer, Christoph; Bradley, Christopher License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Habersack, H, Hein, T, Stanica, A, Liska, I, Mair, R, Jager, E, Hauer, C & Bradley, C 2016, 'Challenges of river basin management: Current status of, and prospects for, the River Danube from a river engineering perspective', Science of the Total Environment, vol. 543, no. Part A, pp. 828-845. Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
  • Dobava Prirodnog Šljunka (Granulacija 16

    Dobava Prirodnog Šljunka (Granulacija 16

    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA KOPRIVNIČKO - KRIŽEVAČKA ŽUPANIJA OPĆINA NOVO VIRJE Općinsko vijeće KLASA: 363-02/18-01/01 URBROJ: 2137/22-18-5 Novo Virje, 28. ožujka 2018. Na temelju članka 15. stavka 4. Zakona o komunalnom gospodarstvu („Narodne novine“ broj 26/03 – pročišćeni tekst, 82/04, 110/04, 178/04, 38/09, 79/09, 153/09, 49/11, 84/11, 90/11, 144/12, 94/13, 153/13, 147/14. i 36/15) i članka 10. Odluke o komunalnim djelatnostima koje se mogu obavljati na temelju pisanog ugovora o povjeravanju komunalnih poslova na području Općine Novo Virje („Službeni glasnik Koprivničko – križevačke županije „ broj 6/14), Općinsko vijeće Općine Novo Virje, na 9. sjednici održanoj 28. ožujka 2018. godine, donijelo je O D L U K U o odabiru najpovoljnije ponude za obavljanje komunalne djelatnosti održavanja nerazvrstanih cesta (šodrenje puteva) na području Općine Novo Virje I. Ovom Odlukom prihvaća se ponuda ponuditelja ''ISKOPI FUČEK ZADRUGA'', Stari drum 7a, Ferdinandovac, za obavljanje komunalne djelatnosti održavanja nerazvrstanih cesta (šodrenje puteva) na području Općine Novo Virje na vrijeme od dvije godine računajući od dana potpisa ugovora, kao najpovoljnija za investitora Općinu Novo Virje s iznosom od: CIJENA PONUDE: - dobava prirodnog šljunka (granulacija 16-32mm) po m³ - 39,00 kn + PDV - dovoz šljunka na relaciji 0-10 km/m³ - 17,60 kn + PDV - dovoz šljunka na relaciji 10-20 km/m³ - 31,20 kn + PDV - dovoz šljunka na relaciji 20-30 km/m³ - 39,00 kn + PDV - dovoz šljunka na relaciji 30 i više km/m³ - 45,00 kn + PDV - sat rada gredera težeg od 10 tona - 305,00 kn + PDV - sat rada kombinirke - 160,00 kn + PDV O b r a z l o ž e n j e: Na temelju članka 5.
  • Izvješće O Gospodarenju Otpadom Za 2020. Godinu Općina Ferdinandovac

    Izvješće O Gospodarenju Otpadom Za 2020. Godinu Općina Ferdinandovac

    Izvješće o gospodarenju otpadom za 2020. godinu Općina Ferdinandovac veljača, 2021. godine 1. Sakupljanje otpada Tvrtka Drava Kom obavlja Javnu uslugu prikupljanja miješanog komunalnog otpada i biorazgradivog komunalnog otpada na području sljedećih 9 općina: Ferdinandovac, Virje, Novo Virje, Kloštar Podravski, Podravske Sesvete, Hlebine, Peteranec, Rasinja i Gola. Sustav sakupljanja komunalnog otpada temelji se na Zakonu o održivom gospodarenju otpadom (N.N. 94/13 i 73/17), Uredbi o gospodarenju otpadom (N.N. 50/17) te Odluci o načinu pružanja javne usluge prikupljanja miješanog komunalnog otpada i biorazgradivog komunalnog otpada pojedine općine. Koncem 2020.g. broj korisnika u općini Ferdinandovac je slijedeći: - Fizičke osobe 465 - Pravne osobe 18 Na kućnom pragu se sakuplja: Miješani komunalni otpad (MKO) - jednom svaka dva tjedna. Korisnicima je dodijeljen spremnik. Papir - jednom mjesečno. Korisnicima se dodjeljuju besplatne plave vreće za papir. Plastika - jednom mjesečno. Korisnicima se dodjeljuju besplatne žute vreće za plastiku. Glomazni otpad - dva puta godišnje. Izvan gore navedenih obveznih aktivnosti, u općini Ferdinandovac sakuplja se dodatno i agro-folija od OPG-a i PG-a četiri puta godišnje na unaprijed određene datume uz obvezu prethodne najave. Sakupljanje otpada sa mjesnih groblja vrši se prema pozivu od strane stručnih službi Općine. Zeleni otoci za papir, plastiku, tekstil, metal, baterije i staklo postavljeni su na 5 lokacija (tablica 1) Općina Ferdinadovac_zeleni otoci Lokacija (mjesto, ulica) Papir Plastika Staklo Tekstil Metal Baterije 1x Ferdinandovac, V. Nazora 1 1x1100L 1x1100L 1x1100L 1x240L 1x10L 240L 1x1100L Ferdinandovac, Trg Slobode 2A 1x1100L 1x1100L 1x1m³ - - - (zvono) Ferdinandovac, Ulica Lepa Greda 31 1x1100L 1x1100L 1x1100L - - - 1x1m³ Ferdinandovac, Ulica Pavljanci 54 1x1100L 1x1100L - - - (zvono) Ferdinandovac, Ulica Brodić 24 1x1100L 1x1100L 1x1100L - - - Tablica 1.
  • Oligarchs, King and Local Society: Medieval Slavonia

    Oligarchs, King and Local Society: Medieval Slavonia

    Antun Nekić OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 MA Thesis in Medieval Studies Central European University CEU eTD Collection Budapest May2015 OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ Chair, Examination Committee ____________________________________________ Thesis Supervisor ____________________________________________ Examiner CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ Examiner Budapest Month YYYY OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. CEU eTD Collection ____________________________________________ External Reader Budapest Month YYYY OLIGARCHS, KING AND LOCAL SOCIETY: MEDIEVAL SLAVONIA 1301-1343 by Antun Nekić (Croatia) Thesis submitted to the Department of Medieval Studies, Central European University, Budapest, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Master of Arts degree in Medieval Studies. Accepted in conformance with the standards of the CEU. ____________________________________________ External Supervisor CEU eTD Collection Budapest Month YYYY I, the undersigned, Antun Nekić, candidate for the MA degree in Medieval Studies, declare herewith that the present thesis is exclusively my own work, based on my research and only such external information as properly credited in notes and bibliography. I declare that no unidentified and illegitimate use was made of the work of others, and no part of the thesis infringes on any person’s or institution’s copyright.
  • Raspored Natjecanja U-11 „Liga Piceka“

    Raspored Natjecanja U-11 „Liga Piceka“

    Raspored natjecanja U-11 „Liga piceka“ sezona 2019./2020. - jesen Sudionici: 1. NK Starigrad Starigrad 2. NK Graničar Đurđevac 3. NK Reka Reka 4. NK Mladost KP Kloštar Podravski 5. NK Tomislav Drnje 6. NK Radnik Križevci Križevci 7. NK Tomislav Radnik Sv.Ivan žabno 8. NK Močile Koprivnica 9. NK Ferdinandovac Ferdinandovac 10. NK Mladost Molve Molve 11. NK Drava PS Podravske Sesvete Raspored: Kolo 1 24.08.2019. Kloštar Podravski Mladost KP - Ferdinandovac Križevci Radnik Križevci - Tomislav Radnik Molve Mladost Molve - Reka Koprivnica Močile - Tomislav D Đurđevac Graničar Đ - Drava PS Kolo 2 31.08.2019. Drnje Tomislav D - Radnik Križevci Ferdinandovac Ferdinandovac - Močile Reka Reka - Mladost KP Podravske Sesvete Drava PS - Mladost Molve Starigrad Starigrad - Graničar Đ Kolo 3 07.09.2019. Molve Mladost Molve - Starigrad Kloštar Podravski Mladost KP - Drava PS Koprivnica Močile - Reka Križevci Radnik Križevci - Ferdinandovac Sveti Ivan Žabno Tomislav Radnik - Tomislav D Kolo 4 14.09.2019. Ferdinandovac Ferdinandovac - Tomislav Radnik Reka Reka - Radnik Križevci Podravske Sesvete Drava PS - Močile Starigrad Starigrad - Mladost KP Đurđevac Graničar Đ - Mladost Molve Stranica 1 od 2 U-11 „Liga piceka“ – sezona 2019./2020. – jesen Kolo 5 21.09.2019. Kloštar Podravski Mladost KP - Graničar Đ Koprivnica Močile - Starigrad Križevci Radnik Križevci - Drava PS Sveti Ivan Žabno Tomislav Radnik - Reka Drnje Tomislav D - Ferdinandovac Kolo 6 28.09.2019. Reka Reka - Tomislav D Podravske Sesvete Drava PS - Tomislav Radnik Starigrad Starigrad - Radnik Križevci Đurđevac Graničar Đ - Močile Molve Mladost Molve - Mladost KP Kolo 7 28.09.2019. Koprivnica Močile - Mladost Molve Križevci Radnik Križevci - Graničar Đ Sveti Ivan Žabno Tomislav Radnik - Starigrad Drnje Tomislav D - Drava PS Ferdinandovac Ferdinandovac - Reka Kolo 8 12.10.2019.
  • ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE in CROATIA: Regulatory Framework, Roles & Responsibilities

    ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE in CROATIA: Regulatory Framework, Roles & Responsibilities

    Workshop on Flood Risk Management measures & links to EU WFD November 11-12, 2015, Zagreb, Croatia ACTIVE FLOOD DEFENCE IN CROATIA: regulatory framework, roles & responsibilities Zoran Đurokovi ć, M.Sc.C.E. Croatian Waters Main Flood Protection Centre Head of Main Centre ∗ Climate change has intensified in recent years worldwide, including Croatia ∗ Extremely dry and wet periods have been alternating frequently in the last approximately 15 years ∗ Damage from extreme hydrological events is increasing ∗ “Average” or “normal” years are becoming increasingly rarer ∗ The frequency of high water waves and extreme water levels including floods is increasing ∗ There are almost no longer any rules concerning the occurrence of high water waves ∗ Forecasting climate models indicate increasingly frequent extreme climate events, both globally and locally ∗ Only in the last 15 years or so, the major part of the Croatian territory has experienced frequent extreme hydrological events which caused droughts in the years 2000, 2003, 2011 and 2012, but also floods in the years 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 ∗ Heavy damage is recorded, primarily in agriculture, but settlements, infrastructure and industrial facilities are also at risk ∗ Still, unlike in many other countries, major fatalities and disastrous damage in the urban areas have been avoided in Croatia ∗ Floods are natural phenomena which cannot be completely prevented. However, flood risks can be reduced to an acceptable level through constant development of flood
  • Mogućnosti Razvoja Turizma U Đurđevačkoj Podravini

    Mogućnosti Razvoja Turizma U Đurđevačkoj Podravini

    Zdravko ŠIMUNIĆ MOGUĆNOSTI RAZVOJA TURIZMA U ĐURĐEVAČKOJ PODRAVINI urđevačka Podravina nalazi se u sjeverozapadnoj Hrvatskoj. Dio je središnje Hrvatske, a poznata je i kao dio bilogorske Podravine, koju čine tri bivše općine: Koprivnica, Đur­ Đ đevac i Virovitica. Prema novom teritorijalnom ustrojstvu Republike Hrvatske bilogorska Podravina znatnim dijelom je ušla u sastav Županije Koprivničko - križevačke. Dosadašnja općina Đurđevac podijeljena je na šest noviH općina koje nose naziv mjesta u kojima imaju sjedište. To su općine: Đurđevac, Ferdinandovac, Kloštar Podravski, Molve, Pitomača i Virje. Općina Pitomača ušla je u sastav Županije Virovitičko - podravske. Ovaj rad obuhvaća čitavo područje bivše općine Đurđevac, jer u turističkom i geografskom pogledu čini jednu cjelinu s gotovo jednakim interesima i sadržajima turističkih vidova i oblika. Osim toga, većina novonastalih općina još ne obavlja sve funkcije iz svoje nadležnosti, a nema ni statistički sređenu dokumentaciju koja bi cjelovito mogla poslužiti za precizniji opis mogućeg razvoja turizma na njihovom području. Kako administrativno - političke granice pojedinih općina i županija nisu pre­ preke razvoju turizma, to ovdje iznijete mogućnosti za razvoj turizma svaka općina ili županija može primijeniti za svoje područje zasebno, zavisno o resursima, ili u međusobnoj suradnji ukoliko za to imaju interes. Đurđevac je mjesto više gradskog tipa, mada u njemu, i ne samo na periferiji, egzistiraju i bogatija poljoprivredna domaćinstva. Smješten je sjeverno od Bilogore, a južno od Drave kojoj je bliži. Asfaltnom je cestom - Podravskom magistralom - udaljen 26 kilometara od Koprivnice, 38 kilometara od Virovitice, a 27 kilometara od Bjelovara (cesta prema Zagrebu), južnim dijelom prolazi željeznička pruga relacije Osijek - Koprivnica - Zagreb (odnosno Koprivnica - Varaždin). Prema popisu stanovništva iz 1991.
  • Janković Castle, Suhopolje

    Janković Castle, Suhopolje

    JanKoVIć castle, Suhopolje ProJect descrIPtIon Janković Castle, located in the Suhopolje municipality in the central part of Virovitica-Podravina County, has historical, architectural and townscape value and, as such, is protected as a cultural monument. Together with the historical park and the remaining supporting structures, Virovitica the castle makes a valuable example of feudal countryside Suhopolje architecture of the late 18th and the early 19th century. The main idea behind the project is the renovation of the old castle and the corresponding facilities into a four-star hotel with accompanying wellness, restaurants and sports Zagreb facilities (swimming pools) covering the total area of 74,430 m2. The location has very good transport links (distance from the highway is 75 km, railway 1 km, airport 85 km) and all necessary infrastructure (gas, electricity, water, sewage) is provided. Given the lack of accommodation facilities, especially those of high quality in the region of Virovitica-Podravina County, the project offers significant potential for tourist development of the region, particularly for sports tourism such as hunting. This region is rich with big game and is known for a large number of wild boars and deer as well as attractive quail hunting in the summer and hare, pheasant, partridge and wild duck hunting in the winter season. PotentIal transactIon structure Janković Castle, 100% owned by Virovitica-Podravina County, will be offered to a strategic partner based on right to built model which will be granted for 99 years and will cost 1 HRK per year (1 HRK = 0.13 EUR) under the condition that the real estate will be brought to purpose within five years from the selection of the best bidder.