DOCSLIB.ORG

Critical Fontana Howard Singerman University of Virginia - Main Campus, [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Critical Fontana Howard Singerman University of Virginia - Main Campus, Hs3x@Virginia.Edu Criticism Volume 57 Article 11 Issue 4 The Avant-Garde at War 2015 Critical Fontana Howard Singerman University of Virginia - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism Recommended Citation Singerman, Howard (2015) "Critical Fontana," Criticism: Vol. 57 : Iss. 4 , Article 11. Available at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/vol57/iss4/11 CRITICAL The subtitle of Anthony White’s monograph on the Italian artist FONTANA Lucio Fontana, Between Utopia Howard Singerman and Kitsch, lays out the terms of the book’s central—and oft-repeated— Lucio Fontana: Between Utopia argument: that Fontana’s art, a and Kitsch by Anthony White. “collision of avant-garde tech- Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, niques and a kitsch past redolent 2011. 336 pp. $29.95 cloth. with outmoded, even infantile desires possesses a critical force” (14). Both Fontana’s avant-garde techniques—the perforations and slashes of his Buchi (Holes, 1949– 68) and Tagli (Cuts, 1958–68), for example—and his embrace of kitsch’s shiny surfaces and ersatz construction worked to desubli- mate and degrade painting, and “only in its decrepitude did Fontana believe painting could have a uto- pian potential” (18). White’s book may well be, as he claims, the first to “systematically account” for the “puzzling paradoxes of the art- ist’s work” (6), but it is not the first English-language monograph on Fontana. There is a good deal of critical and historical writing on Fontana, most of it, particularly in English, has been, as White notes, in exhibition catalogs. The first English-language catalog, with a short, smart essay by Lawrence Alloway, accompanied Fontana’s first one-person show, at Martha Jackson Gallery, in New York City in 1961. And while White’s book covers the entirety of Fontana’s career from the 1920s forward, it is here—with the Jackson show and the reception of the artist’s Venice Criticism Fall 2015, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 697–704. ISSN 0011-1589. doi: 10.13110/criticism.57.4.0697 697 © 2016 by Wayne State University Press, Detroit, Michigan 48201-1309 698 HOWARD SINGERMAN paintings in New York—that the any false reconciliation or mastery. book begins. In Fontana’s work, both avant- A series of ten five-foot-square garde and kitsch are riven by a Spatial Concepts bearing sub- radical incompleteness: a moder- titles like At Dawn Venice Was All nity rigorously opposed to that Golden or Sun in Piazza San Marco which exists in the present, and (both 1961)—“phrases likely to be grounded in a hopeful, forward- appended to mass-produced post- looking appreciation for what has cards for the Italian tourist market” seemingly passed into historical (9)—the Venice paintings enact the oblivion” (14). collision of avant-garde and kitsch White borrows the phrase that White’s system turns on. They “damaged goods” from Walter are, as befits avant-garde practice, Benjamin, and he links Fontana’s monochromes, or nearly so, and attraction to the outmoded punctured or slashed as Fontana’s (whether to the antiquated dreams paintings had been since the first of a past art, the unfulfilled dreams Buchi of 1949, but the paint is silver of an earlier avant-garde, or the and gold acrylic laid on like frosting, pleasure promised by objects de and Fontana crusted his surfaces luxe or their commodity knockoffs) with Murano glass. The paintings to Benjamin’s idea of the “dialecti- are at once at least ironically aspira- cal image”: “Benjamin’s argument tional and, as White’s chapter title that certain cultural products offer has it, “damaged goods.” While a critical image of modernity’s they evoke the breakthroughs of contradictions has immense sig- the avant-garde and even, in their nificance for Fontana’s work” (13). “lavishly ornament[ed]” surfaces, And over and over again, across “the antiquated luxuries of the four decades of work, White points medieval past” (6), their kitsch titles to Fontana’s “use of outmoded and elaborate surfaces—and their forms to draw pointed compari- empty, seemingly mechanical repe- sons between modernity’s utopian titions of a decade-old avant-garde dreams of fulfillment and their strategy—insist on painting’s fail- fatal obsolescence as kitsch within ure, its “decrepitude.” In White’s commodity culture” (271). While accounting, Fontana’s system is Benjamin’s concept is a fruitful far more complex than the simple, one for White, he acknowledges “Manichean” (11) opposition that that they are strange bedfellows; Clement Greenberg offered in Fontana was, after all, a member “Avant-Garde and Kitsch” (1939).1 of Italian fascist movement and Rather, Fontana’s is doubly articu- “clearly had no ideological oppo- lated, each pole internally divided sition to the theme of Italian mili- against itself, “thereby disallowing tary victory” (96) when, in May ON LUCIO FONTANA 699 1936, authorities renamed the “He is the enemy of media purity, Hall of Honor—a commission he and chooses the ambiguous border shared with the critic and architect between the arts, where paintings Edoardo Persico and others at the look like sculpture and sculpture VI Triennale of Milan—the Hall meets painting halfway.”3 This, of Victory in celebration of Italy’s I should note, is the oldest theme invasion of Ethiopia. But White in Fontana criticism; it emerges draws on Benjamin for more than in Persico’s 1936 monograph, the his theorization of the dialectical first extended critical assessment image; he uses Benjamin to give of Fontana’s work, when the art- Fontana his sensibility: “It is no ist’s transgressions—his border coincidence, nevertheless, that in crossings—were those of a sculp- 1936 both the writer and the art- tor rather than a painter: Fontana’s ist were described independently aim was “to resolve sculpture and as being ‘touched by extremes.’ painting,” mustering “all of the The two men were fascinated by acquired taste of the sculptor and the most novel and shocking tech- all of his chromatic obsessions.”4 niques of the avant-garde, and yet White has little interest in pursuing both cherished objects and styles this categorical crossover directly, rendered obsolete by the myth of whether because of its obvious- progress” (14). ness or its formalism; his concern White’s discussion of Fontana instead is with Fontana’s engage- as a dialectician is nuanced and ment with the broader “project of complex, but the presentation of the historical avant-garde, critiqu- Fontana as an artist who works ing the traditional boundaries of the interestingly in between things is autonomous art object” (125)—not a long-standing motif in writing the boundaries between métier, but on the artist. The title of Erika those that separate the traditional Billeter’s lead essay in the catalog work of art from its surroundings, for Guggenheim Museum’s 1977 whether physical, spatial (hence Fontana retrospective, his first in Fontana’s “spatialism”), or the the United States, predicts the syn- broader life-world represented by tax, if not all the terms, for White’s applied art, mass culture, and the own work: “Lucio Fontana: kitsch of his title. Between Tradition and Avant- The Fontana that Alloway pres- Garde.”2 Lawrence Alloway’s essay ents in 1961 is already, as White’s for the 1961 Martha Jackson catalog will be, a more complicated artist is entitled “Man on the Border,” than the one Persico has drawn. and while it is quite brief, it plots His trespasses are doubled, and the a number of the strategies and boundaries he crosses have more oppositions that White will pursue: at stake: his work is troubled by “a 700 HOWARD SINGERMAN problem at the core.” According to of volume” (47)—as evidence not Alloway, of “all of the acquired taste of the sculptor and all of his chromatic Fontana’s ambiguity has obsessions gathered together in to do with the status of the the perfect unity of the work,”6 but work of art. Ever since Art of the work’s failure to cohere, of Nouveau artists have made Fontana’s conscious refusal of “any the decorative arts expressive false reconciliation or mastery.” and the expressive arts deco- Writing of Fontana’s large poly- rative. This transcendence chrome and gilded plaster sculp- of the traditional limits of tures—works such as Victory of the fine and applied arts is the Air and Seated Young Woman, Fontana’s theme. [H]e both 1934, and both of which fig- ignores the borders of paint- ure in White’s account—Persico ing and sculpture, and of the insists that “the sculptor’s most fine and the applied arts. recent works are neither . bizarre [Thus it] is a part of his bor- nor paradoxical but the attempt at der activity that his works extreme coherence [coerenza].”7 Or, often have a connection with perhaps, “extreme consistency.” the chic.5 This is not a passage that White cites—for obvious reasons—but Alloway’s spatial metaphor is I want to use the ambiguity avail- somewhat slippery; Fontana is both able in the Italian word coerenza to on the border and disdainful of it, underline the difference between but it is clear that he needs those Persico’s Fontana and White’s. categories to be felt as set: paint- Neither are interested in Fontana ing and sculpture, fine and applied as a maker of oddities or para- arts, avant-grade and tradition, doxes (accounting for such “puz- avant-garde and kitsch—or at least zling paradoxes” is, after all, the his critics do. Where White differs explicit purpose of White’s sys- from Alloway, and certainly from tematic approach), but where, for Persico, is around the question of Persico, Fontana’s value lies in the resolution, of success.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discovering the Contemporary
    of formalist distance upon which modernists had relied for understanding the world. Critics increasingly pointed to a correspondence between the formal properties of 1960s art and the nature of the radically changing world that sur- rounded them. In fact formalism, the commitment to prior- itizing formal qualities of a work of art over its content, was being transformed in these years into a means of discovering content. Leo Steinberg described Rauschenberg’s work as “flat- bed painting,” one of the lasting critical metaphors invented 1 in response to the art of the immediate post-World War II Discovering the Contemporary period.5 The collisions across the surface of Rosenquist’s painting and the collection of materials on Rauschenberg’s surfaces were being viewed as models for a new form of realism, one that captured the relationships between people and things in the world outside the studio. The lesson that formal analysis could lead back into, rather than away from, content, often with very specific social significance, would be central to the creation and reception of late-twentieth- century art. 1.2 Roy Lichtenstein, Golf Ball, 1962. Oil on canvas, 32 32" (81.3 1.1 James Rosenquist, F-111, 1964–65. Oil on canvas with aluminum, 10 86' (3.04 26.21 m). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. 81.3 cm). Courtesy The Estate of Roy Lichtenstein. New Movements and New Metaphors Purchase Gift of Mr. and Mrs. Alex L. Hillman and Lillie P. Bliss Bequest (both by exchange). Acc. n.: 473.1996.a-w. Artists all over the world shared U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canonisation of Surrealism in the United States
    The canonisation of Surrealism in the United States Sandra Zalman In a pointed assessment of the first show of Surrealism in New York, in 1932, the New York Times art critic asked, ‘How much of the material now on view shall we esteem “art,” and how much should be enjoyed as laboratory roughage’?1 The question encompassed the problem Surrealism posed for art history because it essentially went unanswered. Even after the 1936 endorsement by the Museum of Modern Art in a show organized by its founding director Alfred Barr (1902-1981), Surrealism continued to have a vexed relationship with the canon of modern art. Above all, the enterprise of canonisation is ironic for Surrealism – the Surrealists were self-consciously aiming to overthrow the category of art, but simultaneously participating in a tradition of avant-gardism defined by such revolution.2 Framing his exhibition, Barr presented Surrealism as both the most recent avant-garde export, and also as a purposeful departure from the avant-garde’s experimentation in form. Instead, Barr stressed that Surrealism focused on an anti-rationalist approach to representation. Though Barr made a strong case to integrate Surrealism into the broader understanding of modernism in the 1930s, and Surrealism was generally accepted by American audiences as the next European avant-garde, by the 1950s formalist critics in the U.S. positioned Surrealism as a disorderly aberration in modernism’s quest for abstraction. Surrealism’s political goals and commercial manifestations (which Barr’s exhibition had implicitly sanctioned by including cartoons and advertisements) became more and more untenable for the movement’s acceptance into a modern art canon that was increasingly being formulated around an idea of the autonomous self-reflexive work of art.
    [Show full text]
  • Yayoi Kusama September 23 – December 9, 2017 Public Opening: Friday, September 22, 2017 6:00-8:00Pm Public Hours: Thursdays, Fridays & Saturdays 1:00-5:30Pm
    Judd Foundation 101 Spring Street, New York NY 10012 Telephone 212 219 2747 Fax 212 219 3125 104 South Highland Avenue, Marfa TX 79843 Telephone 432 729 4406 Fax 432 729 4614 juddfoundation.org Yayoi Kusama September 23 – December 9, 2017 Public opening: Friday, September 22, 2017 6:00-8:00pm Public hours: Thursdays, Fridays & Saturdays 1:00-5:30pm Judd Foundation is pleased to present an exhibition of four paintings by Yayoi Kusama on the ground floor of 101 Spring Street in New York. The installation will open to the public on Saturday, September 23, 2017. Donald Judd was a friend of Kusama’s and an advocate of her early Infinity Net series, writing as an art critic for ARTnews, “Yayoi Kusama is an original painter. The five white, very large paintings [presented at the artist-run Brata Gallery in 1959] are strong, advanced in concept and realized.”1 The artists lived in the same building on 19th Street in New York in the early 1960s, where Kusama constructed her first sculptural installations at the same time that Judd constructed his. Judd later wrote a letter of support on behalf of Kusama for the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. In the letter he discusses the exhibition of Infinity Net paintings: “In October of 1959 Yayoi Kusama exhibited five large paintings which were recognized as exceptional. Sidney Tillim, writing in Arts, predicted that the show would prove the sensation of the season. It did prove to be so and has remained one of the few important shows of the last two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Paintings by Streeter Blair (January 12–February 7)
    1960 Paintings by Streeter Blair (January 12–February 7) A publisher and an antique dealer for most of his life, Streeter Blair (1888–1966) began painting at the age of 61 in 1949. Blair became quite successful in a short amount of time with numerous exhibitions across the United States and Europe, including several one-man shows as early as 1951. He sought to recapture “those social and business customs which ended when motor cars became common in 1912, changing the life of America’s activities” in his artwork. He believed future generations should have a chance to visually examine a period in the United States before drastic technological change. This exhibition displayed twenty-one of his paintings and was well received by the public. Three of his paintings, the Eisenhower Farm loaned by Mr. & Mrs. George Walker, Bread Basket loaned by Mr. Peter Walker, and Highland Farm loaned by Miss Helen Moore, were sold during the exhibition. [Newsletter, memo, various letters] The Private World of Pablo Picasso (January 15–February 7) A notable exhibition of paintings, drawings, and graphics by Pablo Picasso (1881–1973), accompanied by photographs of Picasso by Life photographer David Douglas Duncan (1916– 2018). Over thirty pieces were exhibited dating from 1900 to 1956 representing Picasso’s Lautrec, Cubist, Classic, and Guernica periods. These pieces supplemented the 181 Duncan photographs, shown through the arrangement of the American Federation of Art. The selected photographs were from the book of the same title by Duncan and were the first ever taken of Picasso in his home and studio.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Section of a Successful Application
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the NEH Division of Preservation and Access application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/preservation/sustaining-cultural-heritage-collections for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Preservation and Access staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: Furnishing Sustainable Photography Storage Institution: San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Project Director: Jill Sterrett Grant Program: Sustaining Cultural Heritage Collections 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 411, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8570 F 202.606.8639 E [email protected] www.neh.gov San Francisco Museum of Modern Art Furnishing Sustainable Photography Storage Abstract The San Francisco Museum of Modern Art (SFMOMA) is dedicated to making the art of our time a vital and meaningful part of public life. Sustainable conservation of its collections is both a mission-critical activity and a priority in the institution’s strategic plan. SFMOMA respectfully requests a $350,000 NEH SCHC implementation grant as part of a $877,195 project to enhance the preservation of the museum’s photography collection with the purchase and installation of storage furniture for two new storage vaults, the Cold Storage Vault and the Study Center Storage Vault.
    [Show full text]
  • G a G O S I a N Tom Wesselmann Biography
    G A G O S I A N Tom Wesselmann Biography Born in 1931, Cincinnati, OH. Died in 2004, New York City, NY. Education: The Cooper Union, New York, NY. Art Academy of Cincinnati, OH. BA in Psychology, University of Cincinnati, OH. Hiram College, OH. Solo Exhibitions: 2018 Wesselmann : 1963-1983. Gagosian, Beverly Hills, CA. Tom Wesselmann: La promesse du bonheur. Le Nouveau Musée National de Monaco (NMNM), Monaco. Tom Wesselmann : Standing Still Lifes. Gagosian, West 24th Street, New York, NY. 2017 Tom Wesselmann : Bedroom Paintings. Gagosian, Davies Street, London, England. Tom Wesselmann. Almine Rech Gallery, London, England. Tom Wesselmann - Telling It Like It Is. Vedovi Gallery, Brussels, Belgium. 2016 Tom Wessemann Collages: 1959-1964. David Zwirner Gallery, London, England. Tom Wesselmann, Early Works. Van de Weghe Gallery, New York, NY. Tom Wesselmann. Mitchell-Innes and Nash Gallery, New York, NY Tom Wesselmann, A Different Kind of Woman. Almine Rech Gallery, Paris, France. 2015 A Line to Greatness. Galerie Gmurzynska, St. Moritz, Switzerland. 2014 Beyond Pop Art: A Tom Wesselmann Retrospective. Denver Art Museum, Denver, CO. Beyond Pop Art: A Tom Wesselmann Retrospective. Cincinnati Art Museum, Cincinnati, OH. 2013 Pop Art and Beyond: Tom Wesselmann. Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Richmond, VA. Tom Wesselmann, Still Life, Nude and Landscape: The Late Prints. Alan Cristea Gallery, London, England. 2012 Galerie Pascal Lansberg, Paris, France. Wesselmann;Painted Black. David Janis Gallery, New York, NY. Beyond Pop Art, Tom Wesselmann. Montreal Museum of Fine Arts, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Tom Wesselmann Objects of Desire. Maxwell Davidson Gallery, New York, NY. 2011 Tom Wesselmann Draws.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods, Criticism & Exhibition Practice Prof. Radycki P
    MORAVIAN COLLEGE Syllabus Art History 310 ART HISTORY WORKSHOP: METHODS, CRITICISM & EXHIBITION PRACTICE PROF. RADYCKI Phone: 610.861.1627 [email protected] Office: South Hall, Church St. Campus Hours: Mon & Wed 4-5:00 pm What is it you want to know about a work of art? Who made it? What’s it about? When and where was it made? Why was it made? Is it “good” or “bad” art? The questions that you ask, and how you go about finding the answers, lead straight to issues of methodology. This course will 1) survey the major art historians, the questions they asked (and the answers they proposed), from the “who” of biography and connoisseurship through the “what” of iconography to the “when, where, why” of social history; 2) survey modern art criticism in America; and 3) consider contemporary exhibition practice. The goal of the course is to become familiar with the development of the discipline and practice of art history and its theoretical underpinnings, both in the classroom and in museums. Class format is lecture, discussion and student projects/ presentations. REQUIRED TEXTS for purchase 1) W. Eugene Kleinbauer, MODERN PERSPECTIVES IN WESTERN ART HISTORY 2) Patricia Hills, MODERN ART IN THE USA: ISSUES AND CONTROVERSIES OF THE 20TH CENTURY RECOMMENDED TEXTS 3) One art magazine subscription: either ART IN AMERICA or ART NEWS or ARTFORUM 4) Wink & Phipps, MUSEUM GOERS GUIDE RECOMMENDED READINGS in Reeves Library, including Art in America, Art News, Artforum, and The New York Times (Friday edition) COURSE REQUIREMENTS Students must attend all classes and bring the appropriate required text to each class Three assignments: short papers and/or projects (including power point presentations) Field trip to New York City, and short paper (exhibition critique) Grading: one-third is determined by written work; one-third by final project; and one-third by class participation and attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Motherwell
    ROBERT MOTHERWELL Born 1915 Aberdeen, WA, United States Died 1991 Provincetown, MA, United States Education 1926 Otis Art Institute, Los Angeles 1932 California School of Fine Arts, San Francisco 1937 Stanford University, Stanford 1938 Harvard University, Cambridge 1940 Columbia University, New York Selected Awards and Honors 1926 Scholarship to the Otis Art Institute, Los Angeles 1964 Guggenheim International Award of Merit, New York 1970 Inducted, National Institute of Arts and Letters, New York Spirit of Achievement Award, Yeshiva University, New York 1973 Honorary Doctorate, Bard College, Annandale-on-the-Hudson 1977 Artist of the Year, State of Connecticut, Hartford 1978 Grande Médaille de Vermeil de la Ville de Paris, Paris 1980 Gold Medal of Merit, University of Salamanca, Salamanca 1981 Mayor’s Award of Honor for Arts and Culture, New York Skowhegan Award for Printmaking, School of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston 1983 Gold Medal of Honor, The National Arts Club, New York Gold Medal of Honor, Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, Philadelphia 1985 Edward MacDowell Colony Medal, Peterborough Honorary Doctorate, Brown University, Providence Honorary Doctorate, Hunter College, New York Honorary Degree, The New School, New York Inducted, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, New York 1986 La Medalla de Oro de Bellas Artes, Madrid 1987 Wallace Award, American Scottish Foundation, New York Inducted, American Academy of Arts and Letters, New York 1989 National Medal of Arts, Washington, D.C. Centennial Medal of Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge Great Artist Series Award, New York University, New York Selected Solo Exhibitions Please see www.dedalusfoundation.org for a complete exhibition history.
    [Show full text]
  • Ron Kroutel, Emeritus Professor of Art at Ohio U, Talks About His 50 Year Journey
    https://pioneerproductions.blogspot.com/2018/04/ron-kroutel-emeritus-professor-of-art.html THURSDAY, APRIL 26, 2018 Ron Kroutel, Emeritus Professor of Art at Ohio U, Talks About His 50 Year Journey In January Ron Kroutel, Emeritus Professor of Art at Ohio University’s School of Art + Design, celebrated the opening of a retrospective exhibition titled 50 Year Journey. As one might expect there are a variety of chapters in a journey of any length, and especially one of half a century. Though half the 36-piece show was taken down earlier this week, the other half remains on display till later in May. Kroutel was thirty-two when he moved from inner city Detroit to rural Athens to teach at O.U. on the fringe of Appalachia. To some extent it proved to be a bit of culture shock. So begins his story in the book that accompanies his retrospective, published by the Kennedy Museum of Art where his work has been made available to the public. EN: In your earliest work you explore a lot of the "new channels" that were emerging, such as Pop, computer art, conceptual art. At what point did you begin to have a feel for your own voice? Ron Kroutel: Before I studied at The School of the Art Institute of Chicago, I had no formal art training. I just loved to paint and draw. But once in college, I was intimidated by how little I understood of art history and of modern art. Cubism and Abstract Expressionism were a total mystery to me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Career of Burgoyne Diller: 1925-45
    The early career of Burgoyne Diller: 1925-45 Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Johnson, David Hoyt Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 04:24:02 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/566699 THE EARLY CAREER OF BURGOYNE DILLER: 1925-45 by David Htiyt Johnson A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ART In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS WITH A MAJOR IN HISTORY OF ART In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA. 1 9 7 8 Copyright 1978 David Hoyt Johnson STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. ' . Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below; SHELDON REICH Date Professor of Art acknowledgments : A nlimber of people have assisted in numerous ways in the preparation of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Found, Made, Cast
    Found, Made, Cast Sculptures by Nancy Graves Jasper Johns Roy Lichtenstein Essay by Daniel Belasco November 7, 2017 - February 10, 2018 Castelli 3 Perpetual Flux The Cast Sculpture of Jasper Johns, Nancy Graves, and Roy Lichtenstein Daniel Belasco In the late 1950s, Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Director of Collections of The Museum of Modern Art, reluctantly permitted Louise Bourgeois to make a bronze cast of a carved and painted wood sculpture that was already in MoMA’s collection, Sleeping Figure, 1950. Out of respect for the artist and her desire to transpose her wood sculpture into a new medium, he approved a bronze cast in an edition. In return, Bourgeois gave one of the bronzes to MoMA, which catalogued it as Sleeping Figure II and labeled it a “replica.”1 In a memo a few years later, Barr articulated some of his initial reservations about having approved the casting: “The artist, after selling a unique piece to the Museum, has asked for permission to duplicate it in an edition of bronzes. Under these circumstances this presumably diminishes the value of the unique original.”2 Barr’s concerns that Bourgeois’ cast might alter the status of the original work illustrates the transformative power of casting and its uneasy position in modern art. An ancient process used in Egypt, Greece, China, and Benin, casting divests the quality of uniqueness through a series of phases. The two traditional methods of bronze casting—sand casting and lost-wax casting—involve intermediate steps with a mold, a negative form in which the physical sculpture is absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the Reasons for Clement Greenberg's Formalist
    The Intransigent Critic: Reconsidering the reasons for Clement Greenberg’s formalist stance from the early 1930s to the early 1970s © Sheila Christofides A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Postgraduate Board, Student Guild University of New South Wales September, 2004 ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the reasons for Greenberg’s aesthetic intransigence – that is, his adherence to a formalist/purist stance, and his refusal to countenance non-purist twentieth- century avant-garde trends evident in the art he ignored or denigrated, and in the art he promoted. The most substantial body of work challenged is Cold War revisionism (exemplified by the scholarship of Francis Frascina, Serge Guilbaut, and John O’Brian) which casts Greenberg as a politically expedient party to the imperialist agendas of various CIA-funded organisations. The major conclusions reached are that: Greenberg’s aesthetic intransigence was driven by a similarly intransigent ethico-political position, and that his critical method reflected patterns of argumentation set up in ‘Avant-Garde and Kitsch’ (1939). This essay, and Greenberg’s ethico-political position, derived, not least, from his direct encounter with American Nazism and anti-Semitism which led him to realise that America (with what he saw as its decadence, cultural apathy, and low-level mass taste) was as vulnerable to the threat of totalitarianism as Europe and Russia. Reflecting this fear, ‘Avant-Garde and Kitsch’ had juxtaposed a stagnant, impure culture with a vigorous avant- garde culture of impeccable vintage – in the process infusing politics into a formalist, historical conception of modernism Greenberg first devised in the early 1930s and then augmented, during 1938-9, with Hans Hofmann’s theories and others.
    [Show full text]