Airlake Airport Runway Extension

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airlake Airport Runway Extension Final Scoping Environmental Assessment Worksheet Metropolitan Airports Commission Airlake Airport Runway Extension Lakeville, Minnesota February 28, 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title: Airlake Airport Runway Extension 2. Proposer: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Contact Person: Ms. Bridget Rief Title: Assistant Director – Airside Development Address: 6040 – 28th Avenue South City, State, Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55450 Phone: 612-725-8371 Fax: 612-794-4407 E-mail: [email protected] 3. RGU: Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) Contact Person: Mr. Roy Fuhrmann Title: Director of Environment Address: 6040 – 28th Avenue South City, State, Zip: Minneapolis, MN 55450 Phone: 612-726-8134 Fax: 612-725-6310 E-mail: [email protected] 4. Reason for EAW preparation (check one) EIS scoping Mandatory EAW Citizen petition RGU discretion Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number and subpart name: 4410.4400, Subpart 15. Subpart Name: Airport Runway Projects. 5. Project Location County: Dakota City/Township: Eureka Township and adjacent portion of the City of Lakeville N ½ of Section 4, Township 113N, Range 20W SW ¼ of Section 3, Township 113N, Range 20W Attach each of the following to the EAW: County map showing the general location of the project (see Figure 5-1) U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable). (See Figure 5-2) Site plan showing all significant project and natural features (See Figure 5-3) 6. Description a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. The Metropolitan Airports Commission proposes to construct a 902-foot extension to the existing 4,098- foot runway at the Airlake Airport in Lakeville. The runway would also be widened from 75 to 100 feet. Extension of the runway to 5,000 feet in length would require realignment of segments of Cedar Avenue and 225th Street. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. The proposed project would extend the existing runway at the Airlake Airport from 4,098 feet to 5,000 feet in length. The 902-foot extension would be constructed on the southeast end of the existing runway. The full length of the runway would be reconstructed at the time of the extension and the runway would be increased from 75 to 100 feet in width. The existing safety areas would be relocated with the extended runway. The existing High Intensity Runway Lights (HIRLs) would be reinstalled on the extended and widened runway. The existing 40-foot-wide parallel taxiway would be extended the full length of the extended runway. The existing reflectors that line the taxiway may be extended along the extended taxiway, or Medium Intensity Taxiway Lights (MITLs) would be installed along the full length of the taxiway. The existing instrument landing system (ILS) to Runway 30 would be reinstalled on the extended runway, or the system would be upgraded and replaced. Reinstallation of the existing (or upgraded equipment) would include relocation of the glide slope antenna and the associated glide slope critical area alongside the extended runway end. It would also include relocation of the approach lighting system, the series of lights that extend 2,400 feet off of the southeast runway end. The localizer antenna on the northwest end of the runway would not be relocated. The extended runway would reach just across the existing alignment of Cedar Avenue and the associated safety areas would encompass the intersection of Cedar Avenue with 225th Street. This would require realignment of both roadways to a location outside of the Object Free Area (OFA) of the extended runway and clear of the runway approach surface. Cedar Avenue would be reconstructed from a point approximately 0.4 mile south of 215th Street to the point where Cedar Avenue crosses the Vermillion River. The intersection with 225th Street would be reconstructed to maintain the east/west corridor through the area. The airport improvements would not require acquisition of additional property. However, realignment of Cedar Avenue and 225th Street would require acquisition of new right-of-way. c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need for the project and identify its beneficiaries. The existing 4,098-foot runway is of insufficient length to meet the minimum Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design standards for the critical family of aircraft operating at the Airlake Airport. These standards indicate that the runway should be a minimum of 5,500 feet in length. However, Scoping EAW Airlake Airport Runway Extension Page 2 Minnesota Statutes Section 473.641 subdivision 4 prohibits the MAC from extending runway length at its minor airports beyond 5,000 feet without prior legislative authorization. Although less than the recommended 5,500-foot runway length, the proposed 5,000-foot runway would improve the safety of operations at the airport by providing a runway length as close as possible to the FAA recommended runway length. Additional description of the calculation of the recommended runway length is provided in the Draft Scoping Document and in the Airlake Airport Long-Term Comprehensive Plan (2007). d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to happen? Yes X No If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for environmental review. Future development and improvement of the Airlake Airport is described in the Long Term Comprehensive Plan (LTCP). The MAC prepared a Comprehensive Development Plan for the airport in 1989 and completed a LTCP in 1997. The LTCP was updated in 2007 and describes the existing (2005) and future (2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025) use of the airport. The forecasted use and user characteristics define the improvements necessary to maintain safe aviation operations. The 2007 LTCP defines the need for the currently proposed runway extension. However, the document indicates the need is 10-15 years into the future. The wider runway provided by the proposed project will also contribute to the ability to lower the approach visibility minimums below one mile. It is expected that these changes would take place concurrent with the runway/taxiway extension. The LTCP also defines the need for additional hangar storage to serve existing demand as well as the future demand of the forecasted growth in based aircraft. An existing partial parallel taxiway on the south side of the runway provides access to existing taxilanes and available area for hangar construction. This existing building area is expected to accommodate nearly all of the expected 20-year growth in based aircraft. Two smaller areas adjacent to the existing building area could be available for expansion if necessary, but no plans for expansion in these areas is currently planned. The extended runway with improved visibility minimums and sufficient aircraft storage will provide Airlake Airport users with sufficient facilities for the foreseeable 20-year planning term. No further developments beyond those described above are currently planned. The 1989 Comprehensive Development Plan recommended construction of a crosswind runway to meet FAA recommendations for wind coverage. Improvement in available wind data now shows that the existing runway provides sufficient coverage and that the cost of a crosswind runway would outweigh the operational benefit, so the concept was dropped from consideration. Future development surrounding the airport is expected to be industrial in the City of Lakeville and remain agricultural in Eureka Township. Development potential outside of MAC property, including that along the realigned Cedar Avenue, would not be directly affected by the proposed runway extension, nor dependent upon it. e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? __Yes X No If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review. The airport was originally a private airfield constructed, owned and operated by Hitchcock Industries as part of the Airlake Industrial Park. The airfield originally consisted of a 5,000-foot bituminous runway Scoping EAW Airlake Airport Runway Extension Page 3 with Fixed Base Operator (FBO) facility and hangar storage. It was originally constructed to serve the industrial park, but became a privately owned / public use facility open not just to users of the industrial park, but to all aircraft that could operate there. The Airlake Airport was purchased by the MAC in 1981 in response to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) program to improve the reliever airport system and the safety at major hub airports (Minneapolis – St. Paul International Airport (MS) ) by providing a training facility for conducting instrument approaches for the Twin Cities Area at an airport other than MSP to serve the southern area of the Twin Cities. After purchase by the MAC, the Airlake Airport runway was rehabilitated and the thresholds displaced to the existing 4,098 feet to establish the required approaches and safety areas to FAA standards. Additional hangar areas were constructed, an Instrument Landing System (ILS) installed, and the partial parallel taxiway extended to the full runway length. The south building area was prepared for construction of hangars in 1999. Construction of the existing partial parallel taxiway and taxilanes will provide for 70 to 80 additional aircraft hangars.
Recommended publications
  • 2011 Annual Report to the Legislature
    2011 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PREPARED BY THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION NOISE PROGRAM OFFICE MARCH 2012 2011 Annual Report to the Legislature Metropolitan Airports Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.0 OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN ...................................... 6 2 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) ..................................... 7 2.0 OVERVIEW .......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 MSP AIRPORT FACILITIES ................................................................................................ 8 2.1.1 Airfield ........................................................................................................................ 8 2.1.2 Terminal 1- Lindbergh ............................................................................................... 10 7 2.1.3 Terminal 2-Humphrey ................................................................................................ 11 2.1.4 Light Rail and Bus Transit ........................................................................................ 14 2.1.5 MSP Long Term Comprehensive Plan Update ......................................................... 14 2.1.6 MSP 2020 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Labels Facility Managers
    Bruce Visser Kathleen Ryan Norman County/Ada/Twin Valley Airport D00 Aitkin Municipal Airport - Steve Kurtz Field AIT PO Box 9 109 - 1st Ave NW Ada MN 56510 Aitkin MN 56431-1307 Jim Hanson Kreg Anderson Albert Lea Municipal Airport AEL Alexandria Municipal Airport - Chandler Field AXN 73950 - 275th Street 2604 Aga Drive Clarks Grove MN 56016 Alexandria MN 56308 Greg Ruether Bruce Budahn Appleton Municipal Airport AQP Austin Municipal Airport AUM 149 South Munsterman 710 - 21st Street NE Appleton MN 56208 Austin MN 55912 Craig Taylor Bill Masterson Backus Municipal Airport 7Y3 Bagley Municipal Airport 7Y4 1633 24th Ave SW PO Box 178 Backus MN 56435 Bagley MN 56621-0178 Adam Forsberg Karen Weller Baudette International Airport BDE Bemidji Regional Airport BJI 1103 Airport Road NW 3824 Moberg Dr NW, Suite 101 Baudette MN 56623 Bemidji MN 56601 Dan Gens Terry Baird Benson Municipal Airport - Veterans Field BBB Big Falls Municipal Airport 7Y9 1410 Kansas Ave PO Box 196 Benson MN 56215 Big Falls MN 56627 Kevin Hovila Luke Steier Bigfork Municipal Airport FOZ Blue Earth Municipal Airport SBU PO Box 196 7575 Highway 169 Bigfork MN 56628 Blue Earth MN 56013 Kenneth Reichert Steve Wright, Director Bowstring Airport 9Y0 Brainerd Lakes Regional Airport BRD 47703 Nutmeg Road 16384 Airport Road, Suite 5 Deer River MN 56636 Brainerd MN 56401 Dave Bohmer Chris Fredrick Brooten Municipal Airport/John O. Bohmer Field 6D1 Buffalo Municipal Airport CFE 1080 Front Street, Box 400 212 Central Ave Brooten MN 56316 Buffalo MN 55313 Brian Pogodzinski Lucas Milz
    [Show full text]
  • 2019Annual Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp ANNUAL 2019 REPORT Greetings: While the year 2019 might seem an already distant time in the wake of 2020’s world-changing COVID-19 pandemic, it was a period of tremendous growth in the aviation industry. 0LQQHDSROLV6W3DXO,QWHUQDWLRQDO$LUSRUW 063 HQMR\HGDQRWKHUUHFRUG\HDUVXUSDVVLQJPLOOLRQSDVVHQJHUVIRUWKH¿UVWWLPH International travel reached new heights with new service to Dublin, Mexico City and Seoul. And nearly two dozen new restaurants joined the ranks of MSP’s award-winning concession program. The Metropolitan Airports Commission’s (MAC) reliever airport system also saw an increase in the number of aircraft operations and the number of aircraft based there. Work continued on a multi-year project to expand and modernize Terminal 1’s vintage ticketing and bag claim facilities, and a new 5,000-stall parking ramp took shape in preparation for its 2020 debut. The MAC also began planning and increasing investments in its reliever airports, helping ensure the Twin Cities will continue to enjoy not only the largest, but also we believe the best, airport system in the nation. We’re not alone in holding that opinion. In 2019, for the third consecutive year, Airports Council International named MSP the Best Airport in North America in its size category based on passenger surveys. In short, 2019 was a year of tremendous promise that illustrated the close connection between air transportation and a strong HFRQRP\+LVWRU\KDVVKRZQWKDWDYLDWLRQERWKGULYHVDQGEHQH¿WVIURPHFRQRPLFJURZWK±DQGLWZLOODJDLQZKHQWKHFXUUHQW crisis is behind us.
    [Show full text]
  • LE SUEUR AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, March 31, 2019 Virtual Meeting 4:30 P.M
    LE SUEUR AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, March 31, 2019 Virtual Meeting 4:30 P.M. 1. Call to Order (Welcome New Members) 2. Approval of Agenda 3. Approval of minutes from December 5, 2019 meeting 4. Projects Update – Silas Parmer A. Property Acquisition B. Taxi-lane Extension C. Taxi-lane Rehabilitation 5. CIP Update – Silas Parmar 6. EDA Partnership – Newell 7. Airport Manager Report 8. Next Meeting: May 28 or June 2 or June 3, 2020 at 4:30 p.m. 9. Adjourn Airport Administration Office 1500 North Commerce St., Le Sueur, MN 56058 Phone (507) 665-9941 • Fax (507) 665-9948 Minutes of the Airport Commission December 5, 2019 Members Present: Scott Schlueter, Jack Roberts, Debra Wilbright and Chairperson Krogmann Members Absent: Darrell Kolden Others Present; Airport & Facilities Manager Andrew Cemenski, Public Services Director Rich Kucera, Silas Parmar, Airport Consultant/Project Manager from Bolton & Menk and Mike Doherty. The Meeting was called to order by Chairperson Krogmann in the Council Chambers at the SRE building at the Airport at 4:30 PM. Approval of Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Schlueter, seconded by Commissioner Roberts to approve the September 5, 2019 minutes with the correction of Commissioner Schlueter and not Commissioner Roberts for meeting with the EDA, all voted in favor. Projects Update – Silas Parmar: Reported by Silas Parmar, Airport Specialist/Project Manager Discussion on the taxilane extension project, taxilane rehabilitation project and T-hanger project. Motion by Commissioner Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Wilbright to recommend to the City Council to rehabilitate the south taxilane project. All voted in favor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mndot Statewide Airport Economic Study
    MINNESOTA Statewide Airport Economic Impact Study 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TOTAL ANNUAL STATEWIDE ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR ALL MINNESOTA PUBLIC AIRPORTS STUDY MAC ALL PUBLIC ANNUAL TOTALS AIRPORTS AIRPORTS AIRPORTS Employment 13,147 80,890 94,037 Payroll $570.1 million $3.9 billion $4.4 billion Spending $1.0 billion $12.8 billion $13.8 billion Photo Credit: Emmanuel Canaan Annual Economic Activity $ 1.6 billion $16.6 billion $18.2 billion Note: For more information on the MAC studies, visit metroairports.org. STUDY OVERVIEW ECONOMIC IMPACTS FOR ALL PUBLIC AIRPORTS Minnesota is served by an extensive system of 133 public general aviation and commercial ANNUAL EMPLOYMENT ANNUAL PAYROLL service airports that provide essential transportation links, support aviation 94,037 $4.4 B services, and generate a significant amount of economic activity. Starting in late 2018, the ANNUAL ECONOMIC ANNUAL SPENDING ACTIVITY Minnesota Department of Transportation’s Office of Aeronautics studied 126 of these $13.8 B $18.2 B airports to measure their economic impact on the state economy. Throughout this document these 126 airports are referred to STUDY & MAC AIRPORTS as “study airports.” This map shows the geographic location for study and MAC airports. Economic impact results from studies conducted by the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC), for their seven airports in the Minneapolis-Saint Paul Metropolitan Area, are incorporated to provide a comprehensive summary of the annual economic impacts generated by all 133 public airports. Since a similar approach was used to estimate impacts for the MAC airports, the findings from the two separate efforts are combined to produce an overall statewide total, as shown in the table on this page.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET You May Have Heard
    MAC GA Final Four Community FACT SHEET You may have heard... The 2019 NCAA Final Four is coming to Minnesota. The event is expected to draw thousands of people to the area and the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC) is preparing its airport facilities to accommodate those traveling by air. Many event-goers traveling to and from the Twin Cities will use commercial airline services at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport (MSP); many others will use non-commercial aviation services, like those that operate at the MAC’s general aviation airports. Those airports include: • STP: St. Paul Downtown Airport in St. Paul • ANE: Anoka County-Blaine Airport in Blaine • FCM: Flying Cloud Airport in Eden Prairie • MIC: Crystal Airport in Crystal • LVN: Airlake Airport in Lakeville • 21D: Lake Elmo Airport in Lake Elmo The MAC is preparing to meet the increase in demand while ensuring a high level of service and being mindful of neighboring communities. What you can expect... • During the week leading up to the National Championship game and one day after (April 1-9, 2019), MAC expects to have more aircraft taking off and landing than usual at each of its airports. • We anticipate the highest volume of flights to occur from Wednesday, April 3rd through Tuesday, April 9th. • Federal law allows airplanes and helicopters to land and takeoff at any MAC airport any time of day or night. The MAC anticipates • Corporate jets and turboprop aircraft, like the ones arrivals will peak in pictured, will be used more than normal during the hours leading April 6 all hours of the day and night, including the early up to the Semifinal Saturday morning hours and later into the evening.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Airport Land Use Compatibility Manual
    APPENDICES Contents MINNESOTA AIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIBILITY MANUAL APPENDICES APPENDIX 1: Acronyms APPENDIX 2: Glossary APPENDIX 3: Surveys of Minnesota Public Airports – Supplemental Information APPENDIX 4: Contacts APPENDIX 5: Additional Resources APPENDIX 6: Methods for Determining Concentrations of People APPENDIX 7: Third Party Risk Information APPENDIX 8: Takings Law Discussion APPENDIX 9: Additional Federal Statutes and Regulations APPENDIX 10: Sample Easement and Other Agreements APPENDIX 11: FAA 7460-1 Form (Sample) APPENDIX 12: Plants Attractive to Wildlife APPENDIX 13: Wildlife Management APPENDIX 14: Airport Noise Mitigation and Strategies State of Minnesota Airport Compatibility Manual Department of Transportation/ Office of Aeronautics Appendix – Page i APPENDICES Contents [This page intentionally left blank] State of Minnesota Airport Compatibility Manual Department of Transportation/Office of Aeronautics Appendix – Page ii APPENDIX 1: Acronyms APPENDIX 1: ACRONYMS LIST OF ACRONYMS The following is a comprehensive list of acronyms commonly used in aviation land use planning and may serve as a guide for location the appropriate definition in this glossary. AC Advisory Circular ACIP Airport Capital Improvement Plan AGL Above Ground Level AIP Airport Improvement Program ALP Airport Layout Plan APO FAA Office of Aviation Policy and Plan APP FAA Office of Airport Planning and Programming ARC Airport Reference Code ASTM American Society of Testing and Materials AWOS Automated Weather Observing System BOA Bureau of Aeronautics
    [Show full text]
  • MAC Capital Improvement Program
    Metropolitan Airports Commission 2021–2027 Capital Improvement Program Assessment of Environmental Effects (AOEE) Date: Published October 19, 2020 Minneapolis-St. Paul International • Airlake • Anoka County-Blaine • Crystal • Flying Cloud • Lake Elmo • St. Paul Downtown Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 1 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) ............................................................... 3 MSP Long-Term Plan Status .......................................................................................................... 4 MSP Environmental Studies .......................................................................................................... 4 MSP Projects Requiring Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet .................... 5 MSP Cumulative Potential Environmental Effects ........................................................................ 8 ST. PAUL DOWNTOWN AIRPORT (STP) ............................................................................................. 9 STP Long-Term Comprehensive Plan Status ................................................................................. 9 STP Environmental Studies ........................................................................................................... 9 STP Projects Requiring Preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet ...................... 9 STP Cumulative Potential Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Annual Report to the Legislature
    2010 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE PREPARED BY THE METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION AVIATION NOISE AND SATELLITE PROGRAMS OFFICE MARCH 2011 2010 Annual Report to the Legislature Metropolitan Airports Commission TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 4 1.0 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSION STRATEGIC PLAN ........................................ 5 2 MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (MSP) .................................... 6 2.0 OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................. 6 2.1 MSP AIRPORT FACILITIES .................................................................................................. 6 2.1.1 Airfield ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Terminal 1 - Lindbergh ................................................................................................... 8 2.1.3 Terminal 2 - Humphrey .................................................................................................. 8 2.1.4 Terminal Way-Finding Signage ...................................................................................... 9 2.1.5 Light Rail and Bus Transit ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Draft
    Chapter 9 Aviation Investment Direction and Plan Overview Aviation connects the Twin Cities region to the rest of the nation and the world beyond. Although federal law does not require that a region's long-range transportation plan include an aviation element, state law defines aviation as a metropolitan system and requires the Council to prepare an aviation system plan. Minnesota Statutes (473.145) directs the Council to prepare a metropolitan development guide that addresses “… the necessity for and location of airports…” More specifically, Minnesota Statutes 473.146, subd. 3.8 requires the Council to adopt a long-range comprehensive transportation policy Plan that includes “a long-range assessment of air transportation trends and factors that may affect airport development in the metropolitan area and policies and strategies that will ensure a comprehensive, coordinated, and timely investigation and evaluation of alternatives for airport development." The Twin Cities Regional Aviation System is a well developed aviation system that requires continued protection, maintenance, and enhancements to support the Twin Cities economy and transportation infrastructure. The Twin Cities region is served by one major airport with commercial air service − Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport − and eight seven reliever airports for general aviation, business and recreational users. Two seaplan bases Two seaplane bases A are are aalso partss of the system.. are two seaplane bases. and a turf runway airport. The airports are classified according to their role within the regional aviation system as a Major, Intermediate, Minor or Special Purpose facility. Most of the system airports are part of the National Plan of Integrated Airports (NPIAS), which makes them eligible for federal and state funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Investment Direction and Plan 20 40
    9.1 Chapter 9: Aviation Investment Direction and Plan 20 40 2040 TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN version 1.0 NINE: Aviation Investment 9.2 Chapter 9: Aviation Investment and Direction Overview 9.3 Roles and Responsibilities 9.4 Airport Classifications, System Role, and Function 9.6 CONTENTS Airport Capacity 9.12 Long Term Comprehensive Plans 9.15 Aviation Investment Plan 9.17 Aviation Funding Sources 9.18 Planned Investments 9.21 Individual Airport Investments 9.23 An Emerging Issue: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 9.32 2040 TRANSPORTATION POLICY PLAN version 1.0 NINE: Aviation Investment 9.3 Aviation Investment Direction and Plan Overview Aviation connects the Twin Cities region to the rest of the nation and the world beyond. Although federal law does not require that a region’s long-range transportation plan include an aviation element, state law defines aviation as a metropolitan system and requires the Council to prepare an aviation system plan. Minnesota Statutes (473.145) directs the Council to prepare a metropolitan development guide that addresses “… the necessity for and location of airports…” More specifically, Minnesota Statutes 473.146, subd. 3.8 requires the Council to adopt a long-range comprehensive transportation policy plan that includes “a long-range assessment of air transportation trends and factors OVERVIEW AVIATION that may affect airport development in the metropolitan area and policies and strategies that will ensure a comprehensive, coordinated, and timely investigation and evaluation of alternatives for airport development.” The Twin Cities Regional Aviation System is a well developed aviation system that requires continued protection, maintenance, and enhancements to support the Twin Cities economy and transportation infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 FINAL FOUR SPECIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES ARRIVAL and DEPARTURE ROUTES – LVN Airlake Airport TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
    2019 FINAL FOUR SPECIAL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES ARRIVAL AND DEPARTURE ROUTES – LVN Airlake Airport In anticipation of a large number of aircraft operating to and from the Minneapolis-St. Paul area metropolitan airports the week of 2019 Final Four, the following procedures will be used to enhance safety and minimize air traffic delays. TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Traffic management initiatives will be utilized when arrival rates exceed airport capacity. Pilots should be prepared for potential airborne holding, reroutes, or Expect Departure Clearance times (EDCTs) that may be issued for all domestic IFR arrivals to the following airports: AIRPORT IDENTIFIER Minneapolis-St. Paul International/Wold-Chamberlain MSP Saint Paul Downtown Airport - Holman Field STP Flying Cloud Airport FCM Crystal Airport MIC South St. Paul Municipal/ Richard E. Fleming Field SGS Airlake Airport LVN Anoka County-Blaine/Janes Field ANE Lake Elmo Airport 21D Buffalo Municipal Airport CFE Faribault Municipal Airport FBL Maple Lake Municipal Airport MGG Simenstad Municipal/Osceola Airport OEO Red Wing Regional Airport RGK New Richmond Regional Airport RNH Heavy demand and traffic management initiatives may be expected during the following dates/times: DAILY Friday, April 5th, 2019, 0600 CST (1100 UTC) through Tuesday, April 9th, 2019, 2000 CST (0100 UTC, April 10th) Due to the high volume of air traffic anticipated during the 2019 Final Four activities, a ramp reservation is required for arrivals and departures, incluDing drop anD go’s to anD from the Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan area airports between Friday, April 5th, 2019, 1100 UTC and Wednesday, April 11th, 2019, 0100 UTC. Regularly scheduled air carriers and aircraft operating under Title 14, Chapter 1, Subchapter G, Part 121 are exempt from the advisory.
    [Show full text]