Batteries and Fuel Cell Research, Sri Narayan / Surya Prakash
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Batteries and fuel cell research Sri Narayan worked for 20 years at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) where he led the fuel cell research activities for over 15 years and also headed the Electrochemical Technologies Group for 7 years. While at JPL, Dr. Narayan and his associates pioneered the development of direct methanol fuel cell power sources for military and commercial applications, developed new approaches to catalyst preparation by the sputter-deposition technique, new membranes and stacks, and demonstrated a range of hybrid power source systems for space and defense application. He received NASA-JPL’s Exceptional Achievement Award for the development of direct methanol fuel cell and transferring the technology to industry. He has over 35 journal publications and 40 US Patents on various aspects of electrochemical technology. He has delivered invited talks on numerous occasions and has organized several conferences under the auspices of the Electrochemical Society. He is currently the Chairman of the Energy Technology Division of the Electrochemical Society of USA. He has active collaborations with various DoE National Laboratories and Industry. Prof. Narayan joined the faculty of the Department of Chemistry, Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute in May 2010 to advance electrochemical power sources research. Surya Prakash joined the faculty of USC in 1981 and is the George A. and Judith A. Olah Nobel Laureate Chair in Hydrocarbon Chemistry at the Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute and Department of Chemistry. He also serves as the Director of the Institute. His primary research interests are in superacid, hydrocarbon, synthetic organic and organofluorine chemistry, with particular emphasis in the areas of energy and catalysis. He is a co-inventor of the proton exchange membrane based direct oxidation methanol fuel cell and a co-proponent (with Professor Olah) of the Methanol Economy concept. Professor Prakash is a prolific author with more than 630 peer-reviewed scientific publications and holds 30 patents. He has also co- authored or edited 10 books. He has received many awards and accolades including two American Chemical Society National Awards: in 2004 for his achievements in the area of fluorine chemistry and in 2006 for his contributions to hydrocarbon chemistry. He also received the 2006 Richard C. Tolman Award from the Southern California section of the American Chemical Society for his scientific contributions to Southern California. He is the recipient of the 2007 Distinguished Alumni Award from his alma mater, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras and the 2010 CRSI Medal from the Chemical Research Society of India. He is a fellow of the American Association of Advancement of Science and a Member of the European Academy of Arts, Sciences and Humanities. He also sits on several Editorial Boards of Chemical Journals. Batteries and Fuel Cell Research Sri Narayan and G. K. Surya Prakash Loker Hydrocarbon Research Institute University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA 90089-1661 The USC Power Research Workshop, November 18, 2011 Methanol, fuel and feed-stock: The Methanol Economy High octane (ON= 100) clean burning fuel, 15.8 MJ/liter. M-85 Fuel CH3OCH3, high cetane clean burning diesel fuel, LNG and LPG substitute. Direct oxidation methanol fuel cell (DMFC) USC, JPL - Caltech e- Anodic Reaction: e- e- -+ Pt-Ru (50:50) + - CH3OH + H2O CO2 + 6 H + 6 e + H Eo = 0.006 V CH OH 3 O2 / Air + H O Cathodic Reaction: 2 H+ + - Pt 3/2 O2 + 6 H + 6 e 3H2O + H Eo = 1.22 V + Overall Reaction: CO2 H H2O + H 2O CH3OH + 3/2 O2 CO2 + H2O - + Anode Cathode + electricity Pt-Ru Pt catalyst layer catalyst layer Ecell = 1.214 V Proton Exchange membrane (Nafion -H) US Patent, 5,599,638, February 4, 1997; Eur. Patent 0755 576 B1, March 5, 2008. Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Advantages !Methanol, 5 kWh/Liter – Theoretical (2 X Hydrogen) !Absence of Pollutants H2O and CO2 are the only byproducts !Direct reaction of methanol eliminates reforming Reduces stack and system complexity Silent, no moving parts !Capable of start-up and operation at 20 °C and below Thermally silent, good for military applications !Liquid feed of reactants Effective heat removal and thermal management Liquid flow avoids polymer dry-out Convenient fuel storage and logistic fuel Olah, G.A.; Goeppert, A.; Prakash, G.K.S. J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 487 Olah, G.A.; Prakash, G.K.S.; Goeppert, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12881–12898 CRI Carbon Recycling International “George Olah CO2 to Renewable Methanol Plant” Groundbreaking HS Orka Svartsengi Geothermal Power Plant, Iceland, October 17th 2009 Production capacity: 10 t/day, planned expansion to 100 t/day geothermal CO2 + 3H2 CH3OH + H2O electrolysis using geothermal electricity H2O US Patents 7,605,293 and 7,608,743 Int. Pat. Appl., WO2010011504 A2 January 28, 2010 George Olah Renewable Methanol Plant Carbon Recycling International, Iceland The Methanol Economy Anthropogenic Carbon Cycle Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage Sri R Narayan Loker Hydrocarbon Research institute University of Southern California Three Focus Areas in Electrochemical Energy Conversion and Storage 1. Storing large quantities of electrical energy 2. Conversion of organic fuels to electrical energy 3. Fuel and chemical production using electricity Today’s Wind and Solar Capacity : 45 GW of wind generation; 12 GW of solar PV : Some states want to reach 33% by 2020 3 Requirements for Large Scale Energy Storage System >80% round trip efficiency ( charge+ discharge) 5000 cycles ( Low maintenance) 10‐15 years 1‐ to 8‐hour charge/discharge rate Capital Cost per kWh < $100 /kWh ($ 200 Billion ) Energy Cost : Primary cost of energy/ (round trip efficiency * cycle life) for a 2.5 cents /kWh of premium Abundant raw materials; no geo‐political constraints Easily recyclable/ environmentally friendly 4 Cost and Durability are Challenges for Battery Technologies Battery System Features/Advantages Major Disadvantages Moderate energy density (65 Wh/kg), Moderate to high cost ( > $150‐ Zinc‐Bromine Flow 1250 cycles, Moderate efficiency (70%), $200 /kWh), Cycle life and Battery fairly mature technology with large units efficiency needs to be improved. demonstrated. 3000 cycles, Moderate‐to‐high round‐ High cost(>$500/kWh), toxic Vanadium Flow trip efficiency( 85%) fairly mature materials, relatively rare materials Battery technology that has been scaled up to 1 are used MWh High energy density and high power Very high cost Lithium‐Ion density (100‐200 Wh/kg), 1000 cycles, (>$1000/kWh),safety and abuse Rechargeable High round‐trip efficiency (90%). tolerance is low, cycle life needs to be improved. High Energy density (100‐150Wh/kg), Moderate‐High Cost ($200‐ 1500‐3000 cycles, Moderate to high 300/kWh), High Temperature Sodium‐Sulfur round‐trip efficiency (80%). operation (300o‐350oC), requires thermal management systems. High Energy Density ( 400‐600 Wh/kg), High cost (>$1000/kWh), Efficiency Regenerative Fuel High Power Density, 2000 cycles is low (50%), and cycle life needs5 to Cells be increased. Cost, Sustainability and Toxicity of Battery Materials Material Cost, Reserves, Million Toxicity $/kg metric tons [1] Zinc 2.2 150 Moderate to high Lead 2.2 95 High . Vanadium 27 38 High Chromium 10 1.8 High Bromine 0.60 15,000 as NaBr High Iron 0.20 100,000 of iron None ore Oxygen “Almost Unlimited None Free” [1] USGS Minerals Data 6 Iron –Air Battery has High Energy Density and the Iron Electrode is Robust Electrode Reactions (Discharge): ‐ ‐ o (+) Electrode : ½O2 + H2O +2e → 2OH E = +0.41 V ‐ ‐ o (‐) Electrode: Fe + 2OH →Fe (OH)2 +2e E = ‐0.877 V Cell reaction : Fe + ½O2 + H2O → Fe(OH)2 Cell voltage : 1.1 V during discharge •High energy density Theoretical specific energy, 764 Wh/kg; at 20% it is 150 Wh/kg •Robust iron electrode 3000 cycles have been demonstrated at 80% depth of discharge Very tolerant to overcharge and over‐discharge 7 Challenges and Technical Approach Challenge Suppressing hydrogen evolution (+) (-) during charge and stand ‐ Efficiency improvement -- - - - CO –free Composite 2 -- - - - Utilizing any residual evolved air supply ------- electrode -- -- - - - hydrogen for energy generation with --------- - - - Designed ‐ Efficiency improvement advanced - - - -- --- - - - --- - for hydrogen amine ------- - - - utilization absorber ------- - - ------- Identifying active bi‐functional --- --- --- --- - - - - ------ catalysts for air electrode -------- --- --- ------- - - - --- - ‐ Efficiency improvement ----- -------- Developing robust bi‐functional air bi-functional -- - - Electrode additives ----- electrode air electrode - --- --- to suppress on durable -- - - hydrogen evolution ‐cycle life improvement nano- ------- structured Preventing carbonation of the support Electrolyte additives electrolyte to suppress cycle life improvement hydrogen evolution 8 Examples of Iron Electrodes Pressed Plate Iron Electrodes 9 Test Cell Assembly Hg/HgO Reference Top View of Cell Electrode Reference Electrode Iron Electrode Iron Electrode Nickel Electrode Electrolyte: 30% KOH Nickel Electrodes 10 Battery Testing 16‐channel Cells under test Battery Cycling Equipment 11 High Charge Efficiency of Iron Electrode with Additives With Additive Discharge Rate of Iron Electrode is improved by the Additives With sulfide additive No additives 13 Challenges and Technical Approach Challenge Changes in Electrode Morphology Load (‐) (+) -Reduces utilization and limits Concentrated 2+ Fe 3+ operating life Fe ‐ ‐ Cl Electrolyte Cl Fe 3+ Additives to Fe ‐ suppress