Ames Forester Vol. 53
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Masthead Logo Volume 53 Article 1 1-1-1966 Ames Forester Vol. 53 Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/amesforester Part of the Forest Sciences Commons Recommended Citation (1966) "Ames Forester Vol. 53," Ames Forester: Vol. 53 , Article 1. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/amesforester/vol53/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ames Forester by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. S U 4n-J C . ! AMES FORESTER YOUR GUARANTEE OF ECONOMIC PROSPERITY Did you know that one out of every 20 workers in petually . that it provides additional benefits con the United States is engaged in some kind of timber sistent with the primary purpose of growing trees based activity? Together these jobholders contribute as a crop ... that it means greater national strength more than $25 billion to the gross national product. and better living. Tree farming is best for all of the The American Tree Farm System, which is cele people, not just a few! brating its Silver Anniversary in 1966, helps to sustain and expand this economic wealth. The Sys tem is one of the most important factors in main taining a favorable balance of this nation's most valuable renewable resource. GEORG~::CIFIC A leading member of the System, Georgia-Pacific's THE GROWTH COMPANY 4'> dynamic conservation policy maintains that tree For information on Careers in Forestry, write the PR Depart farming means healthy and productive forests per- ment, Georgia-Pacific, PO Box 311, Portland, Oregon 97207. The AMES FORESTER 1966 VOLUME 53 P UBLISHED BY FORESTRY CLUB IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY AMES, IOWA FOREWORD Forestry research is becoming more and more im portant in terms of the amount of time and money spent for it. Continued growth of forestry research will result in greater problems in the acquisition and allocation of research funds, and in gu~ding the re search into those areas ,that will yield the most bene fit to society. The 1966 "Ames Forester" staff seeks to help publicize this problem because understanding the problem is a necessary first step in its solution. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Ames Forester is grateful to all those who helped make this publica:tion possible. We deeply appreciate the financial support of our pwtrons and advertisers. The help and advice of Dr. William Bentley, our faculty adviser, and Mr. Robert Schwartz of the Iowa State University Press were invaluable. We are further indebted to the faculty members, students, and other individuals who offered help and sug gestions. PHOTO CREDITS Iowa State University Printing Service- 11 , 21 Weyerhauser Company-14 National Park Service- 26 Staff, Faculty, and Students-others 2 The 1966 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword and Acknowledgments 2 Dedication 5 The Widening Research Gap in Forestry 6 The Relation of Federal Programs to Forestry Research in the United States 8 Graduate Opportunities in Forestry 10 Research and Forest Recreation . 12 Activities . 14 Summer Camp 23 Faculty 26 The Professional Code of Ethics . 27 Students . 36 Student Awards and Scholarships 37 Seniors 38 Master's Candidates 43 Alumni 44 In Memorium 45 The Uses of Charity 46 Alumni Notes 47 Patrons 64 THE COVER design was created by GENE LUEDTKE, who is a freshman in Applied Art. The AMES FORESTER staff gratefully acknowledges the cooperation of MR. LUEDTKE and PROFESSOR MARY MEIXNER in preparing the cover for the 1966 edition. AM ES FOR ESTER 3 4 The 1966 DEDICATION Keith Allen Bauer The untimely death of Keith Allen Bauer, graduate Parsons College, served in the U.S. Army in South research assistant in Forestry, shocked and saddened Korea, graduated with a B.S. in Forest Management the students and staff of the Department. Keith was a at Iowa State University, and entered Graduate Col ta'1ented, promising young man with a deep-seated lege to work towards Master of Science and Doctor of interest in the world around him. His academic Philosophy degrees in water resources. On September achievements as an undergraduate and graduate 7, 1965, while returning to Iowa State from a visit student in Forestry were outstanding; but more im with friends in Nebraska, Keith was killed in an auto portant than this, Keith's unusual maturity, pleasant mobile accident near Vail, Iowa. personality and subtle sense of humor marked him Staff and students of the Department will miss as a rare individual who would have contributed Keith. In memory of a young man who exemplified much to his profession and to society as a scientist so well, through academic attainment and personal and as a responsible citizen. characteristics, the forest scientist of tomorrow, we Keith, the son of Reverend and Mrs. Lloyd Bauer, dedicate this issue of the Ames Forester to Keith. was born March 1, 1940 in West Chester, Iowa. He "His life was gentle, and the elements was reared on a farm and attended West Chester Con So mixed in him, that Nature might stand up solidated High School where he graduated as Salu And say to all the world, this was a man." tatorian in 1957. From 1957 to 1965, Keith attended - Shakespeare AMES FORESTER 5 • The Widening Research Gap lll Forestry BY R. KEITH ARNOLD ... the Author Dr. R. Keith Arnold became Dean of the School of Natural Resources at the University of Michigan on May 1st of this year. At the time of writing this article, he was Director of the Division of Forest Protection Research with the U. S. Forest Service. Dr. Arnold has almost thirty years experience in forestry research and education, and has been quite concerned in re cent years with research planning and program ming. From 1950 to 1963 Dr. Arnold was a member of the staff of the Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station with headquarters in Berkeley, California. He first served as Pro ject Leader in fire research on work to deter mine the effects of nuclear weapons on forests. Later he was Manager of Operation Firestop. This was a cooperative project in which the For est Service, several military and civilian public agencies, universities, and private industries of the California Forest and Range Experiment joined in an intensive one-year program to ex Station. The following year he joined the staff plore the possibilities of new techniques in con of the University of California as an associate trolling forest fires. In 1955 he was appointed in forestry. Chief of the Division of Forest Fire Research, During World War II, Dr. Arnold served 4 and in 1957 was named Director of the Pacific years wiVh U. S. Navy, assigned to a research Southwest Station. and development unit of the Atlantic Fleet. In Dr. Arnold attended the University of Cali 1946 he returned to the University of California fornia where he obtained a B. S. degree in for to engage in teaching and research in the School estry in 1937. In 1938 he earned a master of of Forestry. Later he spent a year at the Uni forestry degree at Yale University. He entered versity of Michigan to complete work for an ad the Forest Service the same year as a research vanced degree and was granted a Ph. D. in for assistant at the Stanislaus Experimental Forest estry in 1950. I have become increasingly concerned in recent by urbanized values adds new social and economic years about the proliferation of forestry problems in dimensions. Consequences of poor management de relation to the rate of production of new knowledge cisions are more far-reaching and more drastic than required to solve them. New techniques like balloon ever before. logging and remote sensing add to opportunities to Today's forestry problems require new knowledge practice forestry, while new constraints imposed by and accelerated quantification of old knowledge fitted such national concerns as pesticides and environ into ecologic and economic systems that explain how mental health complicate its practice. Competition the real world functions. for land use by a society now dominately motivated In substance, current forestry research programs 6 The 1966 address themselves to the complex elements of mul traditional management of forests. Conflicts and tiple use of forest lands. But research plans have not confusion about the role of professions and disci yet projected programs which look at the entire for plines in the new forestry will continue and possibly est environment as it interacts with urbanization. increase until either the boundary between the forest My concern extends beyond llhe need to finance for and non-forest environments is better defined or until estry research at an accelerated rate to the need for stronger multidisciplinary approaches in science and new evaluations of research needs which encompass technology are developed. all of today's opportunities and constraints. A third major inference of the new forestry relates It was with pleasure then that I looked forward to the state of knowledge required for policy deci to this opportunity for a discussion of research. sions, development of management principles, and My thesis, stated in another way, is that though the practice of land management. Knowledge is in research shifted from a dominant focus on timber adequate. In fact most of the problems of land man oriented land management to meet needs for success agement policies and practices stem from the lack of ful practice of multiple-use forestry, it has failed to quantifiable knowledge about forest ecosystems and treat the forest environment as a complex socio-eco how they mesh with the economic and social systems nomic-ecologic entity.1 Therefore, current projections of today's urbanized society.