Temporal dynamics of active prokaryotic nitrifiers and archaeal communities from river to sea Mylène Hugoni1,2, Hélène Agogué3, Najwa Taib1,2, Isabelle Domaizon4, Anne Moné1,2, Pierre 5 E. Galand5, Gisèle Bronner1,2, Didier Debroas1,2, Isabelle Mary1,2 (1) Clermont Université, Université Blaise Pascal, Laboratoire "Microorganismes : Génome et Environnement", BP 10448, F-63000 CLERMONT-FERRAND, France; (2) CNRS, UMR 6023, LMGE, F-63171 AUBIERE, France; 10 (3) Littoral, Environnement et Sociétés (LIENs), UMR 7266, CNRS, University of La Rochelle, F-17000 La Rochelle, France; (4) Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR 42 Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et Ecosystèmes Limniques, F-74200 Thonon les Bains, France; (5) Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Laboratoire d'Ecogéochimie des 15 Environnements Benthiques (LECOB), Observatoire Océanologique, 66650, Banyuls sur Mer, France. Correspondance: Isabelle Mary, LMGE, Laboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, UMR CNRS 6023, University Blaise Pascal (Clermont-Ferrand II), 24 20 avenue des Landais, BP 80026, Aubière 63171, France. Tel.: + 33 4 73 40 74 70; fax: + 33 4 73 40 76 70; e-mail:
[email protected] 1 25 Abstract To test if different niches for potential nitrifiers exist in estuarine systems, we assessed by pyrosequencing the diversity of archaeal gene transcript markers for taxonomy (16S rRNA) during an entire year along a salinity gradient in surface waters of the Charente estuary (Atlantic coast, France). We further investigated the potential for estuarine prokaryotes to 30 oxidize ammonia and hydrolyze urea by quantifying thaumarchaeal amoA and ureC, and bacterial amoA transcripts. Our results showed a succession of different nitrifiers from river to sea with bacterial amoA transcripts dominating in the freshwater station while archaeal transcripts were predominant in the marine station.