Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights Concerning the Protection of Personal Data

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights Concerning the Protection of Personal Data DP (2013) CASE LAW CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA Strasbourg, 30 January 2013 The Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int) CASE LAW OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF PERSONAL DATA Contents JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (PRESS RELEASES AND LEGAL SUMMARIES) ....................................................................................................................... 11 1. Eur. Court HR, Klass and others v. Germany judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no.28 (No violation of the Convention). Law authorising secret services to carry out secret monitoring of communications (postal and telephone). ............................................................................................. 13 2. Eur. Court HR, Malone v. The United Kingdom judgment of 2 August 1984, Series A no. 82 (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention). Interception of postal and telephone communications and release of information obtained from “metering” of telephones, both effected by or on behalf of the police within the general context of criminal investigation. ...................................................... 17 3. Eur. Court HR, Leander v. Sweden judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no.116 (Violation of Articles 8, 10 and 13 of the Convention). Use of information kept in a secret police-register when assessing a person’s suitability for employment on a post of importance for national security..... 23 4. Eur. Court HR, Gaskin v. The United Kingdom judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no.160 (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention). Refusal to grant former child in care unrestricted access to case records kept by social services. ......................................................................................... 27 5. Eur. Court HR, Kruslin v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no.176-A, and Eur. Court HR, Huvig v. France judgment of 24 April 1990, Series A no.176-B (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention). Telephone tapping carried out by senior police officer under warrant issued by investigating judge. ...................................................................................................................................... 32 6. Eur. Court HR, Niemietz v. Germany judgment of 16 December 1992, Series A no.251-B (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention). Search of a lawyer’s office in course of criminal proceedings against a third party. ............................................................................................................ 37 7. Eur. Court HR, Murray v. The United Kingdom judgment of 28 October 1994, Series A no. 300-A (No violation of the Convention). As far as a person suspected of terrorism is concerned, entry into and search of her home for the purpose of effecting the arrest; record of personal details and photograph without her consent. .......................................................................................... 40 8. Eur. Court HR, Friedl v. Austria judgment of 25 January 1995, application no. 15225/89 (Articles 8 and 13). (Struck out – arrangement). During a demonstration the police had photographed the applicant, checked his identity and taken down his particulars and no effective remedy had been available to him. ........................................................................................................... 46 9. Eur. Court HR, McMichael v. The United Kingdom judgment of 24 February 1995, Series A no. 307-B (Violation of Articles 8 and 6 of the Convention). Non-disclosure to applicants of some confidential documents submitted in care proceedings. ....................................................................... 51 10. Eur. Court HR, Z. v. Finland judgment of 25 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I (Article 8 of the Convention). Seizure of medical records and their inclusion in investigation file without the patient’s prior consent in criminal proceedings; limitation of the The Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int) duration of the confidentiality of the medical data concerned; publication of her identity and HIV infection in a court judgment given in those proceedings. .................................................................... 57 11. Eur. Court HR, Halford v. The United Kingdom judgment of 25 June 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-III (Violation of Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention). Interception of telephone calls made on internal telecommunications system operated by police and on public network; lack of regulation by domestic law. ......................................................................................... 63 12. Eur. Court HR, Anne-Marie Andersson v. Sweden judgment of 27 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV (No violation of the Convention). Lack of possibility for a patient, prior to the communication of personal and confidential medical data by medical authority to a social services authority, to challenge the measure before a court. ........................... 67 13. Eur. Court HR, M.S. v. Sweden judgment of 27 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV (No violation of the Convention). Communication, without the patient’s consent, of personal and confidential medical data by one public authority to another and lack of possibility for patient, prior to the measure, to challenge it before a court. ...................................... 70 14. Eur. Court HR, Lambert v. France judgment of 24 August 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998-V (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention). Judgment whereby Court of Cassation refused a person locus standi to complain of interception of some of his telephone conversations, on the ground that it was a third party’s line that had been tapped. ....................... 74 15. Eur. Court HR, Amann v. Switzerland judgment of 16 February 2000, application no. 27798/95 (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention). Recording a telephone conversation concerning business activities, and creation of a card index and storing of data, both by the Public Prosecutor. .................................................................................................................................................... 78 16. Eur. Court HR, Rotaru v. Romania judgment of 4 May 2000, application no. 28341/95 (Violation of Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention). Storing and use of personal data held by the Romanian intelligence services and absence of the possibility of refuting their accuracy. ............. 82 17. Eur. Court HR, P.G. and J.H. v. the United Kingdom judgment of 25 September 2001, application no no. 44787/98. The applicants complained, relying on Article 8, about the use of covert listening devices to monitor and record their conversations at B’s flat, the monitoring of calls from B’s telephone and the use of listening devices to obtain voice samples while they were at the police station. ......................................................................................................................................... 86 18. Eur. Court HR, M.G v. the United Kingdom judgment of 24 September 2002, no. 39393/98 (Violation of Article 8 of the Convention) Requested access to his social service records. ............. 90 19. Eur. Court HR, Taylor-Sabori v. the United Kingdom judgment of 22 October 2002, no. 47114/99 (Violation of Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention) Interception of pager messages by the police and subsequent reference to them at the trial. ............................................................................ 92 20. Eur. Court HR, Allan v. the United Kingdom judgment of 5 November 2002, application no. 48539/99 (Violation of Articles 6, 8, and 13 of the Convention) The use of covert audio and video surveillance within a prison cell and the prison visiting area. ............................................................. 94 21. Eur. Court HR, Peck v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 28 January 2003, application no. 44647/98 (Violation of Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention). The applicant complained about the disclosure of the CCTV footage to the media, which resulted in images of himself being published The Court’s judgments are accessible on its Internet site (http://www.echr.coe.int) and broadcast widely, and about a lack of an effective domestic remedy. He relied on Articles 8 and 13 of the Convention. ........................................................................................................................... 96 22. Eur. Court HR, Cotlet v. Romania judgment of 3 June 2003, application no. 38565/97. The applicant complained under Article 8 of the Convention of interference with his correspondence with the Convention institutions. He also complained of a violation of his right of individual application, as guaranteed by Article 34 of the Convention. .............................................................. 100 23. Eur. Court HR, Odièvre v. France [GC],application no. 42326/98, ECHR 2003-III of 13 February 2003. Applicant complained about his inability to find out about origins of her mother. The Court ruled that the request for disclosure of her mother’s identity, was subject to the latter’s consent being obtained ................................................................................................................ 104 24. Eur. Court HR, A. v. the United Kingdom judgment of
Recommended publications
  • Rolv Ryssdal* President, and the Former Vice-President, Hermann Mosler Council of Europe
    section Some Notable People3 in the Court’s History CHAPTER 7 Presidents of the Court Lord (Arnold Duncan) McNair (1885–1975) British • Barrister, law professor and international judge • Judge (1946–52) and President of the International Court of Justice (1952–5) • President (1959–65) and thereafter judge at the Court (1965–6) Lord McNair served as the first President of the Court. He was educated at Aldenham School and Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge, where he read law. From 1907 to 1908 he was Secretary of the Cambridge University Liberal Club, and in 1909 he was President of the Cambridge Union. After practising as a solicitor in London, he returned to Cambridge in 1912 to become a fellow of his old college, later becoming senior tutor. In 1917 he was called to the Bar, Gray’s Inn. He had taken an interest in international law from an early age, and in 1935 he was appointed Whewell Professor of International Law at Cambridge. However, he left this chair in 1937 to become Vice-Chancellor of Above: Lord (Arnold Duncan) McNair. Liverpool University. He remained at Liverpool until 1945, Opposite: Poster with some of the when he returned to Cambridge to take up the position of Convention’s keywords (2009). Professor of Comparative Law. The following year he was 106 The Conscience of Europe: 50 Years of the European Court of Human Rights Chapter 7: Presidents of the Court elected a judge of the International Court of Justice in The rights. He wanted above all to place human rights at the heart 1974 that France ratified the Convention, only two years Hague, a post he held until 1955, and he was also President of the European construction project then just beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Change in the European Court of Human Rights: Accession of Eastern and Central European Member States
    CHANGE IN THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: ACCESSION OF EASTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPEAN MEMBER STATES © 2009 By Rachel M. West A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion Of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies Croft Institute for International Studies The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi Spring 2009 Approved: ______________________________ Advisor: Charles H. Brower ______________________________ Reader: Dr. Valentina B. Iepuri ______________________________ Reader: Dr. Kees Gispen TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction……………..……………………………………………………………..………..3 Part I: The European Court of Human Rights before 1989.......……………………………..6 Part II: Growing Membership and Caseload...................……..……………………….......13 Part III: Changing Cases and Jurisprudential Reorientation...............................................22 Part IV: Compliance with the Court Judgments.......….....................……………………...27 Part V: Lessons Learned.......................................................................……………………….35 Conclusion………………………………………………………………………..…………….41 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………………44 2 INTRODUCTION After the destruction and brutality of World War II, Western European states established the Council of Europe (COE) in 1949 as the first international organization designed to promote European integration. The following year, COE members adopted the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (European Convention) which became the
    [Show full text]
  • Academy of European Law Twenty-Seventh Session
    Academy of European Law Twenty-seventh Session Human Rights Law 20 June – 1 July 2016 Reading Materials The European Court of Human Rights as a Source of Human Rights Law Ineta Ziemele Professor, Riga Graduate School of Law; Judge of the Constitutional Court of Latvia; former judge and Section President at the European Court of Human Rights TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Course Outline 1 2 Reading List 3 3 Harris, O’Boyle & Warbrick, Law of the European Convention on 5 Human Rights, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, 2014 4 Luzius Wildhaber, Arnaldur Hjartarson, Stephen Donnelly, “No 24 Consensus on Consensus? The Practice of the European Court of Human Rights”, Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 7-12 (2013). 5 Steven Greer, The European Convention on Human Rights. 40 Achievements, Problems and Prospects, Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 316 – 321. 6 Ineta Ziemele, “International Courts and Ultra Vires Acts”, in 46 Caflisch et al (eds.), Liber Amicorum Luzius Wildhaber. Human Rights – Strasbourg Views.Droits de l’Homme – Regards de Strasbourg. N.P.Engel, Publisher, 2007, pp. 537 – 556 7 James Crawford, Chance, Order, Change: The Course of 66 International Law, Hague Academy of International Law, 2016, Chapter IX. The European Court of Human Rights as a Source of Human Rights Law Professor Ineta Ziemele Ph.D. (Cantab.) Judge of the Constitutional Court of Latvia, former judge and Section President at the European Court of Human Rights Outline of the lectures: 1. Introduction – setting the stage - Article 38. 1 (d) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice: “judicial decisions as subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law” - Article 32 of the ECHR: “1.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Judges of the Court Since 1959
    JUDGES OF THE COURT SINCE 1959 / LES JUGES DE LA COUR DEPUIS 1959 ALBANIA / ALBANIE 2019 – Darian PAVLI 2008 – 2019 Ledi BIANKU 1998 – 2008 Kristaq TRAJA ANDORRA / ANDORRE 2015 – Pere PASTOR VILANOVA 1996 – 2015 Josep CASADEVALL ARMENIA / ARMÉNIE 2015 – Armen HARUTYUNYAN 2003 – 2014 Alvina GYULUMYAN AUSTRIA / AUTRICHE 2015 – Gabriele KUCSKO-STADLMAYER 2001 – 2015 Elisabeth STEINER 1998 – 2001 Willi FUHRMANN 1977 – 1998 Franz MATSCHER 1959 – 1977 Alfred VERDROSS AZERBAIJAN /AZERBAÏDJAN 2017 – Lətif HÜSEYNOV 2003 – 2016 Khanlar HAJIYEV BELGIUM / BELGIQUE 2021 – Frédéric KRENC 2012 – 2021 Paul LEMMENS 1998 – 2012 Françoise TULKENS 1986 – 1998 Jan DE MEYER 1973 – 1986 Walter-Jean GANSHOF VAN DER MEERSCH 1959 – 1973 Henri ROLIN (President: 27.09.1968-05.05.1971) BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA / BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE 2012 – Faris VEHABOVIĆ 2004 – 2011 Ljiljana MIJOVIĆ BULGARIA / BULGARIE 2015 – Yonko GROZEV 2008 – 2015 Zdravka KALAYDJIEVA 1998 – 2008 Snejana BOTOUCHAROVA 1992 – 1998 Dimitar GOTCHEV CROATIA / CROATIE 2013 – Ksenija TURKOVIĆ 1998 – 2012 Nina VAJIĆ CYPRUS / CHYPRE 2016 – Georgios SERGHIDES 2008 – 2016 George NICOLAOU 1998 – 2008 Loukis LOUCAIDES 1990 – 1998 Andreas Nicolas LOIZOU 1961 – 1984 Mehmed ZEKIA CZECH REPUBLIC / RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE 2012 – Aleš PEJCHAL 1993 – 2012 Karel JUNGWIERT DENMARK / DANEMARK 2014 – Jon Fridrik KJØLBRO 1998 – 2014 Peer LORENZEN 1989 – 1998 Isi FOIGHEL 1982 – 1988 Jørgen GERSING 1980 – 1981 Max SØRENSEN 1971 – 1980 Helga PEDERSEN 1959 – 1971 Alf Niels Christian ROSS ESTONIA / ESTONIE 2020 – Peeter ROOSMA 2011
    [Show full text]
  • Der Gerichtshof
    Richter des EGMR EGMR-E 1, 711 Richter des EGMR seit 1959 (Stand: 31. Juli 2008) (alphabetisch geordnet, Angaben zur Amtszeit s.u. S. 717 ff.) A D Kemel Fikret ARIK (Türke) Henri DELVAUX (Luxemburger) Einar ARNALDS (Isländer) Jan DE MEYER (Belgier) B André DONNER (Niederländer) András B. BAKA (Ungar) E Giorgio BALLADORE PALLIERI Sir Vincent EVANS (Brite) (Italiener) Dimitris EVRIGENIS (Grieche) Rudolf BERNHARDT (Deutscher) F Isabelle BERRO-LEFÈVRE Antoine FAVRE (Schweizer) (Monegassin) Luigi FERRARI BRAVO (Italiener, ge- Ledi BIANKU (Albaner) wählt auf Vorschlag von San Marino) Federico BIGI (Sanmarinese) Marc FISCHBACH (Luxemburger) Suat BILGE (Türke) Sir Gerald FITZMAURICE (Brite) Denise BINDSCHEDLER-ROBERT Isi FOIGHEL (Däne) (Schweizerin) Sir John FREELAND (Brite) Corneliu BIˆRSAN (Rumäne) Willi FUHRMANN (Österreicher) Davíd Tho´ r BJÖRGVINSSON (Isländer) Elisabet FURA-SANDSTRÖM (Schwedin) Giovanni BONELLO (Malteser) Javier BORREGO BORREGO G (Spanier) Walter GANSHOF VAN DER Snejana BOTOUCHAROVA MEERSCH (Belgier) (Bulgarin) Eduardo GARCÍA DE ENTERRÍA Ali BOZER (Türke) (Spanier) Sir Nicolas BRATZA (Brite) Lech GARLICKI (Pole) Volodymyr BUTKEVYCH (Ukrainer) Jørgen GERSING (Däne) Feyyaz GÖLCÜKLÜ (Türke) C Dimitar GOTCHEV (Bulgare) Ireneu CABRAL BARRETO (Portugiese) Hanne Sophie GREVE (Norwegerin) Lucius CAFLISCH (Schweizer, gewählt Alvina GYULUMYAN (Armenierin) auf Vorschlag Liechtensteins) H Juan Antonio CARRILLO Khanlar HAJIYEV (Aserbaidschaner) SALCEDO (Spanier) John HEDIGAN (Ire) Josep CASADEVALL (Andorraner) Päivi HIRVELÄ (Finnin)
    [Show full text]