Google Analytics Search Engines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Google Analytics Search Engines By default, Google Analytics identifies the following list of websites as search engine referrals in your reports. Engine Example Domain Name About http://www.about.com/ Alice http://www.alice.com/ Alltheweb http://www.alltheweb.com/ Altavista http://www.altavista.com/ AOL http://www.aol.com/ Ask http://www.ask.com/ Baidu http://www.baidu.com/ Bing http://www.bing.com/ CNN http://www.cnn.com/SEARCH/ Daum http://www.daum.net/ Ekolay http://www.ekolay.net/ Eniro http://www.eniro.se/ Google All Google Search domains (e.g. www.google.com, www.google.co.uk, etc) Kvasir http://www.kvasir.no/ Live http://www.bing.com/ Lycos http://www.lycos.com/ Mamma http://www.mamma.com/ MSN http://www.msn.com/ Mynet http://www.mynet.com/ Najdi http://www.najdi.org.mk/ Naver http://www.naver.com/ Netscape http://search.netscape.com/ O*NET http://online.onetcenter.org/ Ozu http://www.ozu.es/ PCHome http://www.pchome.com/ Rambler http://www.rambler.ru/ Search http://www.search.com/ Sesam http://sesam.no/ Seznam http://www.seznam.cz/ Szukacz http://www.szukacz.pl/ Terra http://www.terra.com/ Virgilio http://search.virgilio.it/ Voila http://www.voila.fr/ Wirtulana Polska http://www.wp.pl/ Yahoo http://www.yahoo.com/ Yam http://www.yam.com/ Yandex http://www.yandex.com/ .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Internet Economy 25 Years After .Com
THE INTERNET ECONOMY 25 YEARS AFTER .COM TRANSFORMING COMMERCE & LIFE March 2010 25Robert D. Atkinson, Stephen J. Ezell, Scott M. Andes, Daniel D. Castro, and Richard Bennett THE INTERNET ECONOMY 25 YEARS AFTER .COM TRANSFORMING COMMERCE & LIFE March 2010 Robert D. Atkinson, Stephen J. Ezell, Scott M. Andes, Daniel D. Castro, and Richard Bennett The Information Technology & Innovation Foundation I Ac KNOW L EDGEMEN T S The authors would like to thank the following individuals for providing input to the report: Monique Martineau, Lisa Mendelow, and Stephen Norton. Any errors or omissions are the authors’ alone. ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Robert D. Atkinson is President of the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Stephen J. Ezell is a Senior Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Scott M. Andes is a Research Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Daniel D. Castro is a Senior Analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. Richard Bennett is a Research Fellow at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation. ABOUT THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOUNDATION The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a Washington, DC-based think tank at the cutting edge of designing innovation policies and exploring how advances in technology will create new economic opportunities to improve the quality of life. Non-profit, and non-partisan, we offer pragmatic ideas that break free of economic philosophies born in eras long before the first punch card computer and well before the rise of modern China and pervasive globalization. ITIF, founded in 2006, is dedicated to conceiving and promoting the new ways of thinking about technology-driven productivity, competitiveness, and globalization that the 21st century demands.
[Show full text]
No Facet Analyses of Categories Used in Web Directories
Date : 09/ 06/2006 Facet Analyses of Categories Used in Web Directories: A Comparative Study Kyung-Sun Kim Sei-Ching Joanna Sin Soo-Jin Park Xiaohua Zhu Jom Polparsi School of Library and Information Studies University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, USA Meeting: 136 Classification and Indexing Simultaneous Interpretation: No WORLD LIBRARY AND INFORMATION CONGRESS: 72ND IFLA GENERAL CONFERENCE AND COUNCIL 20-24 August 2006, Seoul, Korea http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/index.htm Abstract Faceted classification is believed to be suitable for organizing digital information resources. Based on a faceted classification model suggested for Web resources (Zins, 2002), the current study analyzed popular Web directories from different Asian countries/areas and examined cultural differences reflected in their classification systems. Three popular Web directories from four countries/regions (China, Hong Kong, Korea, and Thailand) were selected and their classifications were analyzed and compared: a local Yahoo and two home-grown Web directories from each country/region. Based on the findings, the study suggests a model that might be more suitable to Asian culture. INTRODUCTION Information available through the Web is becoming more diverse and its amount is also growing rapidly. As of January 2005, it is estimated that the indexable Web has reached to at least 11.5 billion pages (Gulli & Signorini, 2005). Presently, these voluminous and ever changing resources on the Web are often organized in mostly hierarchical classification systems. However, such hierarchical systems might not be as suitable for organizing cross-cultural resources for a culturally and linguistically diverse groups, as there might be cultural differences in categorization (Segall, 1990; Malt, 1995).
[Show full text]
A Study on Vertical and Broad-Based Search Engines
International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology IJLTET Special Issue- ICRACSC-2016 , pp.087-093 e-ISSN: 2278-621X A STUDY ON VERTICAL AND BROAD-BASED SEARCH ENGINES M.Swathi1 and M.Swetha2 Abstract-Vertical search engines or Domain-specific search engines[1][2] are becoming increasingly popular because they offer increased accuracy and extra features not possible with general, Broad-based search engines or Web-wide search engines. The paper focuses on the survey of domain specific search engine which is becoming more popular as compared to Web- Wide Search Engines as they are difficult to maintain and time consuming .It is also difficult to provide appropriate documents to represent the target data. We also listed various vertical search engines and Broad-based search engines. Index terms: Domain specific search, vertical search engines, broad based search engines. I. INTRODUCTION The Web has become a very rich source of information for almost any field, ranging from music to histories, from sports to movies, from science to culture, and many more. However, it has become increasingly difficult to search for desired information on the Web. Users are facing the problem of information overload , in which a search on a general-purpose search engine such as Google (www.google.com) results in thousands of hits.Because a user cannot specify a search domain (e.g. medicine, music), a search query may bring up Web pages both within and outside the desired domain. Example 1: A user searching for “cancer” may get Web pages related to the disease as well as those related to the Zodiac sign.
[Show full text]
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
[Show full text]
Evaluation of Web-Based Search Engines Using User-Effort Measures
Evaluation of Web-Based Search Engines Using User-Effort Measures Muh-Chyun Tang and Ying Sun 4 Huntington St. School of Information, Communication and Library Studies Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, U.S.A. [email protected] [email protected] Abstract This paper presents a study of the applicability of three user-effort-sensitive evaluation measures —“first 20 full precision,” “search length,” and “rank correlation”—on four Web-based search engines (Google, AltaVista, Excite and Metacrawler). The authors argue that these measures are better alternatives than precision and recall in Web search situations because of their emphasis on the quality of ranking. Eight sets of search topics were collected from four Ph.D. students in four different disciplines (biochemistry, industrial engineering, economics, and urban planning). Each participant was asked to provide two topics along with the corresponding query terms. Their relevance and credibility judgment of the Web pages were then used to compare the performance of the search engines using these three measures. The results show consistency among these three ranking evaluation measures, more so between “first 20 full precision” and search length than between rank correlation and the other two measures. Possible reasons for rank correlation’s disagreement with the other two measures are discussed. Possible future research to improve these measures is also addressed. Introduction The explosive growth of information on the World Wide Web poses a challenge to traditional information retrieval (IR) research. Other than the sheer amount of information, some structural factors make searching for relevant and quality information on the Web a formidable task.
[Show full text]
Internet and Information About Nuclear Sciences
SK00K0107 INTERNET AND INFORMATION ABOUT NUCLEAR SCIENCES. THE WORLD WIDE WEB VIRTUAL LIBRARY: NUCLEAR SCIENCES Jozef KURUC Department of Nuclear Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynska dolina CH-1, SK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic, E-mail: [email protected] Similarly as in other areas, as well as in chemistry, INTERNET has brought revolutionary changes in searching, processing of information and in.the teaching of chemistry [1], The powerful instrument in searching of information in INTERNET are different browsers of the web-pages (www.altavista.com, www.yahoo.com, search.excite.com, www.webcrawier.com, www.iycos.com, infoseeek.go.com, www.hotbot.com, www.zoznam.sk, www.kompas.sk www.seznam.cz and other) [2], but they usually give over-much number of web-pages. Sometimes is ill and slowly to obtain necessary information from so over- much number searched and offered web-pages. By searching in the INTERNET assists the advanced searching, but sometimes it does not conduce to searched information. For assistance by the solving of these problems and for speeding-up of the work serve specialised servers, which give grouped information from certain scientific area and first and foremost links for next relative relevant web-links and web-pages, which are in the area of chemistry, for example, Yahoo- Chemistry-Server [3], list of Mendeleev periodic tables of elements [4], from which each provides certain supplementary information about properties of individual elements, isotopes, occasionally radionuclides. Some of them provide more detail information about radioisotopes [5-7], in nuclear physics it is, for example, Nuclear Info WWW Server [8}.
[Show full text]
UC Berkeley Recent Work
UC Berkeley Recent Work Title The Internet and E-commerce Development in Mexico Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6c17b69n Authors Kenney, Martin Curry, James Contreras, Oscar Publication Date 2001-05-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Internet and E-commerce Development in Mexico BRIE Working Paper 144 January 2, 2002 ©Copyright 2001 by the authors By James Curry Profesor-Investigador El Colegio de la Frontera Norte Tijuana, Baja California, México U.S. Mail: P.O. Box L Chula Vista, CA 91912 [email protected] and Oscar Contreras Profesor-Investigador El Colegio de Sonora Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico and Martin Kenney Professor Department of Human and Community Development University of California, Davis Davis, California 95616 [email protected] & Senior Research Associate Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-2322 The authors thank the UC MEXUS-CONACYT program for the funding that is reported in this research. Generous support for production of the BRIE Working Papers Series was provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Table of Contents · Summary and Findings · Introduction · Methodology · The Internet in Mexico The Early History of the Internet in Mexico Growth in Internet Usage Internet Access and Service Providers · E-Commerce in Mexico Barriers to the Growth of E-Commerce · Business-to-Consumer E-Commerce Mexico and the U.S. Hispanic and Pan-Latin American/Hispanic Markets Customization Brief Descriptions
[Show full text]
How to Choose a Search Engine Or Directory
How to Choose a Search Engine or Directory Fields & File Types If you want to search for... Choose... Audio/Music AllTheWeb | AltaVista | Dogpile | Fazzle | FindSounds.com | Lycos Music Downloads | Lycos Multimedia Search | Singingfish Date last modified AllTheWeb Advanced Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Google Advanced Search | HotBot Advanced Search | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Domain/Site/URL AllTheWeb Advanced Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Google Advanced Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | SearchEdu.com | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search File Format AllTheWeb Advanced Web Search | AltaVista Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Geographic location Exalead Advanced Search | HotBot Advanced Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Images AllTheWeb | AltaVista | The Amazing Picture Machine | Ditto | Dogpile | Fazzle | Google Image Search | IceRocket | Ixquick | Mamma | Picsearch Language AllTheWeb Advanced Web Search | AOL Advanced Search | Exalead Advanced Search | Google Language Tools | HotBot Advanced Search | iBoogie Advanced Web Search | Lycos Advanced Search | MSN Search Search Builder | Teoma Advanced Search | Yahoo Advanced Web Search Multimedia & video All TheWeb | AltaVista | Dogpile | Fazzle | IceRocket | Singingfish | Yahoo Video Search Page Title/URL AOL Advanced
[Show full text]
Blue Coat Proxysg Configuration and Management Guide, Version 4.1.4
Blue Coat® Systems ProxySG™ Configuration and Management Guide Version SGOS 4.1.4 Blue Coat ProxySG Configuration and Management Guide Contact Information Blue Coat Systems Inc. 420 North Mary Ave Sunnyvale, CA 94085-4121 http://www.bluecoat.com/support/index.html [email protected] [email protected] http://www.bluecoat.com For concerns or feedback about the documentation: [email protected] Copyright© 1999-2006 Blue Coat Systems, Inc. All rights reserved worldwide. No part of this document may be reproduced by any means nor modified, decompiled, disassembled, published or distributed, in whole or in part, or translated to any electronic medium or other means without the written consent of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. All right, title and interest in and to the Software and documentation are and shall remain the exclusive property of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. and its licensors. ProxySG™, ProxyAV™, CacheOS™, SGOS™, Spyware Interceptor™, Scope™ are trademarks of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. and CacheFlow®, Blue Coat®, Accelerating The Internet®, WinProxy®, AccessNow®, Ositis®, Powering Internet Management®, and The Ultimate Internet Sharing Solution® are registered trademarks of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. All other trademarks contained in this document and in the Software are the property of their respective owners. BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC. DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS OR OTHER TERMS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, STATUTORY OR OTHERWISE, ON SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION FURNISHED HEREUNDER INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION THE WARRANTIES OF DESIGN, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC., ITS SUPPLIERS OR ITS LICENSORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, WHETHER ARISING IN TORT, CONTRACT OR ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY EVEN IF BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, INC.
[Show full text]
Acquisition Research Sponsored Report Series
65536= 1pt ACQUISITION RESEARCH SPONSORED REPORT SERIES ReSEARCH: A Requirements Search Engine: Progress Report 2 September 2008 by Paige Adams ([email protected]) Pranav Anand ([email protected]) Grant Gehrke ([email protected]) Ralucca Gera ([email protected]) Marco Draeger ([email protected]) Craig Martell ([email protected]) Kevin Squire ([email protected]) Approved for public release, distribution is unlimited. Prepared for: Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943 The research presented in this report was supported by the Acquisition Chair of the Grad- uate School of Business & Public Policy at the Naval Postgraduate School. To request Defense Acquisition Research or to become a research sponsor, please contact: NPS Acquisition Research Program Attn: James B. Greene, RADM, USN, (Ret) Acquisition Chair Graduate School of Business and Public Policy Naval Postgraduate School 555 Dyer Road, Room 332 Monterey, CA 93943-5103 Tel: (831) 656-2092 Fax: (831) 656-2253 email: [email protected] Copies of the Acquisition Sponsored Research Reports may be printed from our website www.acquisitionresearch.org Abstract This research addresses three closely related problems. (1) Most current search technology is based on a popularity metric (e.g., PageRank or ExpertRank), but not on the semantic content of the searched document. (2) When building components in a service- oriented architecture (SOA), developers must investigate whether components that meet certain requirements already exist. (3) There is no easy way for writers of requirements documents to formally specify the meaning and domain of their requirements. Our goal in the research presented here is to address these concerns by designing a search engine that searches over the “meanings" of requirements documents.
[Show full text]
A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Through Collaboration Among Search Engine Users to More Relevant Results
A Survey of Collaborative Web Search Through Collaboration among Search Engine Users to More Relevant Results Pavel Surynek Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Malostranské náměstí 25, Prague, Czech Republic Keywords: Collaborative Web Search, Social Search, Search Engine, Search Results, Collaborative Filtering, Recommender Systems, System Integration. Abstract: A survey on collaborative aspects of web search is presented in this paper. Current state in full-text web search engines with regards on users collaboration is given. The position of the paper is that it is becoming increasingly important to learn from other users searches in a collaborative way in order to provide more relevant results and increase benefit from web search sessions. Recommender systems represent a rich source of concepts that could be employed to enable collaboration in web search. A discussion of techniques used in recommender systems is followed by a suggestion of integration web search with recommender sys- tems. An initial experience with web search powering small academic site is reported finally. 1 INTRODUCTION AND assumption that a series of queries characterize the effort of what the user want to find better than the MOTIVATION single query. The typical search engine however does not help in this effort – users are put into isola- Web search is an area of the information technology tion typically which precludes any cooperation and industry where artificial intelligence and particularly recommendation from other users based on past knowledge engineering techniques can be applied queries. To be honest, for instance the Bing search with potentially significant impacts. Currently users engine (more correctly the decision engine) uses face a still increasing amount of data of many kinds certain technology that provide search results based that can be accessed through web (textual data, mul- on user’s search history and geographical location.
[Show full text]
Portal Is Most Often One Specially-Designed Web Page at a Website Which Brings Information Together from Diverse Sources in a Uniform Way
A web portal is most often one specially-designed Web page at a website which brings information together from diverse sources in a uniform way. Usually, each information source gets its dedicated area on the page for displaying information (a portlet); often, the user can configure which ones to display. Variants of portals include Mashup (web application hybrid) and intranet"dashboards" for executives and managers. The extent to which content is displayed in a "uniform way" may be more or less depending on the intended user and the intended purpose as well as the diversity of the content. Very often design emphasis is on a certain "metaphor" for configuring and customizing the presentation of the content and the chosen implementation framework and/or code libraries. In addition, the role of the user in an organization may determine which content can be added to the portal or deleted from the portal configuration. A portal may use a search engine API to permit users to search intranet content as opposed to extranet content by restricting which domains may be searched. Apart from this common search engines feature, web portals may offer other services such as e-mail, news, stock quotes, information from databases and even entertainment content. Portals provide a way for enterprises and organizations to provide a consistent look and feel with access control and procedures for multiple applications and databases, which otherwise would have been different web entities at various URLs. The features available may be restricted by whether access is by an authorized and authenticated user (employee,member) or an anonymous site visitor.
[Show full text]