DOCSLIB.ORG

Jonathan Edwards and True Conversion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jonathan Edwards and True Conversion Of Greatest Importance: Jonathan Edwards and True Conversion Discerning and applying the scriptural rules concerning true religion which are serviceable to ministers in counseling and conducting souls committed to their care Jonathan Edwards Conference 2011 The Jonathan Edwards Society Northampton, Mass. October 7, 2011 Rev. Wesley Pastor 1 Introduction As a New England pastor, my singular burden is for souls. Some twenty years ago I planted a church in Vermont, trusting in the gospel, “the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes” [Rom. 1:16], to convert souls even in spiritually parched New England. My burden is that my people might secure safe passage into heaven. Over time I came to appreciate the challenges of bearing that burden. The gospel and its application, so straightforward in seminary, proved quite complex in the crucible of the pastorate. Marriages between professing Christians failed. Committed congregants nursed persistent and serious sins. Youth, having come to Christ as children, wandered in their teens. This Christianity made no sense. Where was the life-changing power? Had the gospel failed? Or was there some other explanation? The answer lies in the nature of true religion. Jonathan Edwards, in his masterful Religious Affections, asserted that the resolution of this one issue trumped all others: There is no question of greater importance to mankind, and that it more concerns every individual person to be well resolved in, than this: What are the distinguishing qualifications of those that are in favor with God, and entitled to his eternal rewards? Or, which comes to the same thing, What is the nature of true religion? and wherein lie the distinguishing notes of that virtue which is acceptable in the sight of God?1 This question consumed Edwards: “It is a subject on which my mind has been peculiarly intent, ever since I first entered on the study of divinity.”2 Edwards felt a pastor’s burden for souls, particularly for helping his people discern the state of their own souls. Yet the nature of true religion was subject to much confusion and dissension. “[T]hough it be of such importance, and though we have clear and abundant light in the word of God to direct us in this matter, yet there is no one point wherein professing Christians differ more one from another.”3 Still, “it is beyond doubt that the Scriptures abound with rules, which may be very serviceable to ministers in coun- 1 Jonathan Edwards, A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections, in The Works of Jonathan Edwards (Carlisle, Penn.: Banner of Truth, 1984), 1:234. 2 Edwards, Religious Affections, 1:234. 3 Edwards, Religious Affections, 1:234. 2 seling and conducting souls committed to their care in things appertaining to their spiritual and eternal state.”4 Today there is pervasive disinterest in and even hostility toward the examination of a person’s Christian profession. Yet there remains no question of greater importance than the nature of true saving faith. Edwards, dubbed “extraordinary” even by Marsden and considered by many the “most brilliant of all American theologians,” is a worthy consultant on this topic.5 We must seek to know something of his “peculiarly intent” mind, to know the “notes of that virtue” abounding in scripture and useful to shepherds in counseling their flock.6 By tracing Edwards’ developing understanding through its historical context to its maturity in Religious Affections, and by understanding these rules ourselves, ministers will be better equipped to apply them, as Edwards did, to the counsel and direction of the souls committed to our care. Development of Edwards’ Rules Edwards’ understanding developed over three periods roughly corresponding to the frontier phase (1734-39), peak (1740-43) and decline (1744-55) of the First Great Awakening. The first phase was somewhat of a honeymoon period. Edwards called the emerging revival “the foremost act of God since the Reformation and the greatest ever in America.”7 His “lengthy and glowing account,” published in 1737 as A Faithful Narrative of the Surprising Work of God, testified to the powerful movement of God’s Spirit.8 4 Edwards, Religious Affections, 1:263. 5 See George M. Marsden, Jonathan Edwards: A Life (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), 1, for the most recent and highly esteemed critical biography of Edwards. Also Murray or Dwight for the perspectives of admirers: Iain H. Murray, Jonathan Edwards: A New Biography (Edinburgh: Banner of Truth, 1987), xv-xvii; Sereno E. Dwight, The Life of President Edwards (New York: Carvill, 1830; repr., Puritan Reprints, 2007), 2. 6 Edwards, Religious Affections, 1:263. 7 Edwards did acknowledge some corruption in his own church’s revival. In analyzing the awakening, he remarked in a December 1743 letter to a fellow minister in Boston: “[I]n the years 1740 and 1741, the work seemed to be much more pure, having less of a corrupt mixture than in the former great outpouring of the Spirit in 1735 and 1736.” See Jonathan Edwards, An Account of the Revival of Religion in Northampton in 1740-1742, in Jonathan Edwards: On Revival (Carlisle, Penn: Banner of Truth, 1984), 158. Also Marsden, Jonathan Edwards, 169. 8 Marsden, Jonathan Edwards, 163. In the 1738 sermon series later published as Charity and its Fruits, Edwards reported, “The Spirit of God has been poured out wonderfully here. Multitudes have been converted. Scarcely a family has been passed by.” Jonathan Edwards, Charity and Its Fruits: Christian Love as Manifested in the Heart and Life, (ed. Tryon Edwards; Carlisle, Penn.: Banner of Truth, 2000), 49. 3 Such high approbation reflected Edwards’ understanding and observation of the nature of true religion. He described it in his 1734 sermon A Divine and Supernatural Light as “a true sense of the divine excellency of the things revealed in the word of God, and a conviction of the truth and reality of them thence arising.”9 This understanding was encapsulated in Charity and Its Fruits: “All the virtue that is saving, and that distinguishes true Christians from others, is summed up in Christian love.”10 Edwards explained: True love is an ingredient in true and living faith, and is what is most essential and distinguishing in it. … A truly practical or saving faith, is light and heat together, or rather light and love, while that which is only speculative faith, is only light without heat; and, in that it wants spiritual heat or divine love, is in vain, and good for nothing.11 Unlike many of his contemporaries, Edwards recognized that intellectual “light” without the “heat” of love did not meet the scriptural requirements for saving faith.12 The next phase was the perfect laboratory to develop this thesis. The period 1740-43, corresponding to the main phase of the Awakening, shows an attempt to balance increasingly extreme positions of both the movement’s supporters and its detractors. The Yale controversy in 1741, with students accusing faculty of being unregenerate; the revival meeting “excesses” of shrieking, roaring, trances and dances; and an unscriptural confidence in distinguishing sheep from goats, created a critical need for balance.13 That balance is evident in several works but best exemplified in Edwards’ September 1741 Yale commencement address, published as The Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God.14 Edwards first lists nine signs “which are no evidences that a work is not from the Spirit of God,” 9 Jonathan Edwards, A Divine and Supernatural Light, in Works, 2:14. 10 Edwards, Charity and Its Fruits, 3. 11 Edwards, Charity and Its Fruits, 13. 12 New Lights, like Edwards, saw true religion as chiefly consisting in raised affections produced by the light; Old Lights, most notably Charles Chauncy, placed true religion primarily in enlightened understanding and disdained raised affections. 13 Marsden, Jonathan Edwards, 231-235, 269-284. In the spirit of confident assessment of men’s souls, the wild James Davenport even personally challenged Charles Chauncy’s conversion and status (p.272). 14 Others include Some Thoughts Concerning the Present Revival of Religion in New England and An Account of the Revival of Religion in Northampton in 1740-1742, both published in 1743. 4 a challenge to both Old and New Lights.15 He then enumerates five “distinguishing scripture evidences and marks of a work of the Spirit.”16 Finally, Edwards admonishes the Old Lights to accept the revival as a work of God’s Spirit and not oppose it, and warns the New Lights to avoid excessive behaviors that could discredit the work.17 The final period, 1744-55, saw theological reflection and prodigious publication. Revival fires were dim if not completely extinguished when, in 1746, Edwards published Religious Affections to correct the excesses which, he believed, were largely to blame for quelling the Awakening.18 He devoted the bulk of the work to correcting New Light enthusiasts, at times sounding much like Charles Chauncy, his Old Light nemesis.19 Though Edwards did continue to build on Affections, this work clearly demonstrates a grasp of scriptural rules informed by decades of study and reflection, and experience with thousands of true and false conversions amid two major awakenings.20 To that “most widely read and admired of his theological works” we now turn.21 Understanding Edwards’ Rules Edwards’ magnum opus was organized into three parts. Part I defined and defended the doctrine, principally against the Old Lights, that “true religion, in great part, consists in holy affections.”22 Part II listed “some things which are no signs that affections are gracious, or that they are not.”23 15 Jonathan Edwards, The Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God, in Works, 2:261-266.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Capper 1998 Phd Karl Barth's Theology Of
    Karl Barth’s Theology of Joy John Mark Capper Selwyn College Submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy University of Cambridge April 1998 Karl Barth’s Theology of Joy John Mark Capper, Selwyn College Cambridge, April 1998 Joy is a recurrent theme in the Church Dogmatics of Karl Barth but it is one which is under-explored. In order to ascertain reasons for this lack, the work of six scholars is explored with regard to the theme of joy, employing the useful though limited “motifs” suggested by Hunsinger. That the revelation of God has a trinitarian framework, as demonstrated by Barth in CD I, and that God as Trinity is joyful, helps to explain Barth’s understanding of theology as a “joyful science”. By close attention to Barth’s treatment of the perfections of God (CD II.1), the link which Barth makes with glory and eternity is explored, noting the far-reaching sweep which joy is allowed by contrast with the related theme of beauty. Divine joy is discerned as the response to glory in the inner life of the Trinity, and as such is the quality of God being truly Godself. Joy is seen to be “more than a perfection” and is basic to God’s self-revelation and human response. A dialogue with Jonathan Edwards challenges Barth’s restricted use of beauty in his theology, and highlights the innovation Barth makes by including election in his doctrine of God. In the context of Barth’s anthropology, paying close attention to his treatment of “being in encounter” (CD III.2), there is an examination of the significance of gladness as the response to divine glory in the life of humanity, and as the crowning of full and free humanness.
    [Show full text]
  • Hauerwas and the Law: Framing a Productive Conversation
    07_KAVENY (DO NOT DELETE) 11/19/2012 3:59 PM HAUERWAS AND THE LAW: FRAMING A PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATION CATHLEEN KAVENY* I INTRODUCTION The title of this symposium is “Theological Argument in Law: Engaging with Stanley Hauerwas.” When I discussed the project with colleagues specializing in Christian theological ethics, they were interested, even intrigued. Truth be told, however, they were also rather skeptical. Why the skepticism? It is universally acknowledged that Hauerwas is both engaged and engaging, actively involved in wide-ranging conversations with academics, pastors, doctors, and—yes—even lawyers. Furthermore, no one would deny that arguments rooted in the Christian theological tradition have made their way into American law over the years. Indeed, in 1892, a Supreme Court opinion unselfconsciously proclaimed that “this is a Christian nation.”1 “A Christian nation”? Ah-ha! Many Christian theologians would say there is the problem in a nutshell. Throughout his career, Stanley Hauerwas has tirelessly protested all efforts to embed Christianity, as either an intellectual system or social group, into the framework of worldly power. Such efforts, in his view, inevitably corrupt the thought and the practices of Christians, twisting both toward the goal of sustaining the kingdoms of this world, rather than building the kingdom of God that was inaugurated by the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Unlike the “peaceable kingdom” of Jesus, earthly kingdoms are inherently built on violence—not only the violence of warfare, but also the threats of coercive force that ultimately and undeniably back any system of positive law.2 The law, in other words, describes and implements the operating system of the strikingly unpeaceable secular world.
    [Show full text]
  • An Encouragement to Read Jonathan Edwards's
    RANDY NEWMAN, PH.D. ANAN ENCOURAGEMENT ENCOURAGEMENT TO READ JONATHAN EDWARDS’S TO READTHE RELIGIOUS JONATHAN AFFECTIONS: EDWARDS’S HOW SWEET IT IS! THE RELIGIOUS AFFECTIONS: HOW SWEET IT IS! RANDY NEWMAN, PH.D. SENIOR TEACHING FELLOW FOR APOLOGETICS AND EVANGELISM, C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE plethora of pendulums swing within the Christian world, yanking believers from one unbalanced extreme to the opposite end with virtually no time to settle in the middle where, in many cases, the proper balance is found. One of those pendulum A swings has been the ride between doctrine and devotion. At times we’ve insisted upon right beliefs with such vehemence that we’ve sounded no different from the current political firestorm. Some of us were “right” but we certainly weren’t righteous. At other times we so emphasized experience, we waffled about where the lines of orthodoxy really lie. Do we really need to choose only one of those — right beliefs or real experience? Doesn’t God call us to love Him with all our hearts and all our minds? Don’t the Scriptures call us to “taste and see” that the Lord is good? I find the Bible to be an amazingly balanced book, exhorting us to think right thoughts and live godly lives. In just one of hundreds of examples I could cite, Colossians 3 tells us to both set our “hearts on things above” and also to set our “minds on things above” (vv. 1–2 NIV). In that same chapter, we’re commanded to “put to death” all sorts of evil desires (vv.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Edwards, a Treatise Concerning Religious Affections (1746)1
    1 Primary Source 10.4 JONATHAN EDWARDS, A TREATISE CONCERNING RELIGIOUS AFFECTIONS (1746)1 Jonathan Edwards (1703–58) was an American preacher, philosopher, theologian, prolific author, and one of the country’s most influential intellectuals. A precocious youth, he entered Yale just before he turned thirteen. Among his strongest interests were in the latest discoveries of science (then called natural philosophy), which reinforced his belief in God’s masterful design of nature. John Locke’s An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), one of the founding texts of British empiricism, also exerted a powerful influence on the budding scholar. He graduated first in his class. He then served in a number of congregations and completed further study at Yale, where he taught theology. His most important public role was strongly influencing the religious revivals in 1734 and 1740–41, the latter called the Great Awakening. This movement affected vast numbers of colonists, instilling in them a sense of their personal relationship with God, of the radical equality and worth of all people, and of the greater importance of religious experience over institution and doctrine. Edwards developed a philosophical theology emphasizing the sovereignty, beauty, and boundless love of God. He taught that we can choose freely to receive that love and that it alone can transform humanity and the world. This conception was certainly allied to the emphasis within the revival movements on emotional responses to the Divine, yet following the Great Awakening Edwards preached a series of critical sermons in 1742–43, published in 1746 under the title of Religious Affections, in which he argued that both emotion and intellect contribute to religious conversion but that only “converting grace” bestowed by God enables Christians to “awaken” to perceive and respond to the boundless love of God as expressed most fully in the self sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 Calvin Bibliography
    2003 Calvin Bibliography Compiled by Paul Fields I. Calvin’s Life and Times A. Biography B. Cultural Context­Intellectual History C. Cultural Context­Social History ​ D. Friends and Associates ​ E. Polemical Relationships ​ II. Calvin’s Works A. Works and Selections ​ B. Critique ​ III. Calvin’s Theology A. Overview ​ B. Doctrine of God ​ 1. Knowledge of God ​ 2 . Providence ​ 3. Sovereignty ​ 4. Trinity ​ C. Doctrine of Christ ​ D. Doctrine of the Holy Spirit ​ ​ ​ E. Doctrine of Salvation ​ 1. Assurance ​ 2. Justification ​ 3. Predestination ​ F. Doctrine of Humanity ​ 1. Image of God ​ 2. Natural Law ​ 3. Sin ​ G. Doctrine of the Christian Life ​ 1. Ethics ​ 2. Piety ​ 3. Sanctification ​ H. Ecclesiology ​ 1. Overview ​ 2. Discipline and Instruction ​ 3. Missions ​ 4. Polity ​ I. Worship ​ 1. Iconoclasm ​ 2. Liturgy ​ 3. Music ​ 4. Prayer ​ 5. Preaching and Sacraments ​ J. Revelation ​ 1. Exegesis and Hermeneutics ​ 2. Scripture ​ K. Apocalypticism ​ ​ L. Patristic and Medieval Influences ​ M. Method ​ IV. Calvin and Social­Ethical Issues V. Calvin and Political Issues VI. Calvinism A. Theological Influence ​ 1. Overview ​ 2. Christian Life ​ 3. Covenants ​ 4. Discipline ​ 5. Dogmatics ​ 6. Ecclesiology ​ 7. Education ​ 8. Grace ​ 9. God ​ 10. Justification ​ 11. Predestination ​ 12. Revelation ​ 13. Sacraments ​ 14. Salvation ​ 15. Worship ​ B. Cultural Influence ​ 1. Overview ​ 2. Literature ​ C. Social, Economic, and Political Influence ​ D. International Influence ​ 1. England ​ 2. France ​ 3. Germany ​ 4. Hungary ​ 5. Netherlands ​ 6. South Africa ​ 7. Transylvania ​ 8. United States ​ E. Critique ​ VII. Book Reviews I. Calvin’s Life and Times A. Biography Brockington, William S., Jr. "John Calvin." In Dictionary of World Biography, Vol. 3: The ​ ​ ​ Renaissance, edited by Frank N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life and Theology of Jonathan Edwards
    The Life & Theology of Jonathan Edwards DM860 Dr. David Owen Filson, PhD Reformed Theological Seminary – Charlotte January 14-18, 2019 The Life & Theology of Jonathan Edwards RTS-Charlotte – DM860 Dr. David Owen Filson True instruction was in his mouth, and no wrong was found on his lips. He walked with me in peace and uprightness, and he turned many from iniquity. For the lips of a priest should guard knowledge, and people should seek instruction from his mouth, for he is the messenger of the Lord of hosts. (Malachi 2:6-7, ESV) Keep a close watch on yourself and on the teaching. Persist in this, for by so doing you will save both yourself and your hearers. (1Timothy 4:16, ESV) “One handful of marbles is all you get.” The Multifaceted Edwards Theologian Philosopher __________ __________ & __________ Revivalist/Evangelist “Jonathan Edwards was first of all a preacher.” George M. Marsden (author, Jonathan Edwards: A Life) “…prompted by his affective theology, Edwards passionately prepared and proclaimed his message in order to guide his flock to their eternal home.” Richard A. Bailey (author, “Driven by Passion: Jonathan Edwards and the Art of Preaching” in The Legacy of Jonathan Edwards, 64-65. Co-ed. The Salvation of Souls: Nine Previously Unpublished Sermons on the Call of Ministry and the Gospel by Jonathan Edwards) 1 “The profoundest reasoner, and the greatest divine, in my opinion, that America ever produced.” Samuel Davies (1723-61, “Apostle of Virginia” and Edwards’ successor at the College of New Jersey) “He was, in the estimation of the writer, one of the most holy, humble and heavenly-minded men, that the world has seen, since the apostolic age.” Ashbel Green (1762-1848, eighth president of Princeton) “The greatest, wisest, humblest and holiest of uninspired men.” John Collett Ryland (1723-92, Baptist minister and theologian) “ ‘The Freedom of the Will’ by Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to John Wesley's Abridgement of Jonathan Edwards's Treatise Concerning Religious Affections1
    An Introduction to John Wesley’s Abridgement of Jonathan Edwards’s Treatise Concerning Religious Affections1 by Gregory S. Clapper, PhD (Emory University), Professor of Religion and Philosophy, The University of Indianapolis An Opening Word on Terminology It should be noted at the outset of the reader’s engaging with this eighteenth-century document that terminology about the inner life—‘affections’, ‘feelings’, ‘emotions’, ‘tempers’, etc.—has undergone many changes in the years since Edwards and Wesley wrote. Several scholars have noted this evolution and have made clear how appreciating that change can affect our understanding of what Edwards and Wesley meant by the ‘heart’ and its components. Without commenting on all of this important recent scholarship on affectivity here, let me simply caution the reader of this Treatise that you will not understand what is set forth here if you start with the nineteenth- and twentieth-century assumptions that ‘affections’ (or our more typically modern term ‘emotions’) are simply reducible to ‘feelings’ and that they are separate from our intellectual processes. Thankfully, sophisticated analyses of affectivity have started appearing, especially in the last 20 years, that give us a more nuanced vocabulary for and appreciation of the inner life. This has been of immense help in seeking to understand what people like Edwards and Wesley were saying about the ‘heart’. If one is interested in this historical development, I recommend the work of Thomas Dixon, who has made clear the nature of the (distorting) historical change in vocabulary in his From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category.2 Additionally, the work of many twenty-first-century philosophers has helped to capture a more well-rounded view of the integrity of ‘emotions’, correcting the distortions that Dixon has traced.
    [Show full text]
  • 144 the Methodist Edwards: John Wesley's Abridgement Of
    Methodist History, 50:3 (April 2012) THE METHODIST EDWARDS: JOHN WESLEy’S ABRIDGEMENT OF THE SELECTED WORKS OF JonatHAN EDWARDS1 CHRISTOPHER M. B. ALLISON Among eighteenth-century evangelical figures, Jonathan Edwards and John Wesley usually rank as some of the most notable. The two men presided over tremendous religious change in their respective countries while having no personal relationship. In fact, their chief tangible connection was through the mutual relationship with George Whitefield. It is not an exaggeration to state that their ideas about the character of religious reform and revival were notably different. Edwards was the dogged defender of inherited Puritan Calvinism in the face of the challenges of the enlightenment. Wesley, on the other hand, was the most notable representative of evangelical Arminian Anglicanism, who worked out the intricacies of free will and the heritage of the Protestant Reformation. When it came to the nuts and bolts of revival- ism, they shared a concern for the spread of the Gospel and the reformation of the English world. This paper will look at Wesley’s abridgement of se- lected works by Edwards that were influenced by the underlying Calvinist- Arminian debate in England, but were ultimately adapted by Wesley to serve the end of promoting revivalism. I will first look at Wesley as a religious publisher, then move on to delineating the connections between the two men, and in the final section I will analyze the method of abridgement that Wesley adopted by looking at his editorial choices of Edwards’ works. In the com- ments on abridgement, I will not fixate on small errata.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Truths Are Hard to Grasp. So What Can Be a Greater Help Than a Really Good Example? So with Christian Holiness
    “Some truths are hard to grasp. So what can be a greater help than a really good example? So with Christian holiness. As we walk the ‘way of holi- ness,’ these outstanding ‘saints’ (‘sanctified ones’) from every branch of the church in the early modern period can light up our path. They can help us, too, to be ‘examples of the believers.’ This latest part of this ex- cellent series is to be read slowly and prayerfully.” —Thomas A. Noble, PhD Research Professor of Theology Nazarene Theological Seminary Kansas City “Early modern saints? We Christian believers more typically associate ‘saints’—those who give their lives without reserve to God—with the early church or the medieval period. Modernity often seems so skeptical and so antithetical to lives dedicated to holiness. Yet this collection of moving readings from the early eighteenth to the early twentieth century introduces us to women and men from a broad selection of Christian tra- ditions who display fervent faith linked to specific markers of modernity. An emphasis on experience and the mandate to choose? Read Edwards, Kierkegaard, and Moody. The appeal to reason? Read Edwards and the evangelist Whitefield! The clarion cry of liberty? Read the Roman Cath- olic bishop Carroll and the abolitionist Wilberforce. Fervent faith in the efficacy of education? Read Bishop Carroll and Mother Seton. Apprecia- tion of science and the ‘facts’? Read Neander and Orr. Here are readings infused with the Christ-centered religious devotion and displaying the appeal to personal holiness (often given a peculiar modern spin, ‘existen- tial,’ if you will) associated with earlier generations of Christian believers.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious Experience, the Public Sphere, and Evangelical Lay Women's Writing in Eighteenth Century England Andrew O
    Wayne State University Wayne State University Dissertations 1-2-2013 Drawn Out In Love: Religious Experience, The Public Sphere, And Evangelical Lay Women's Writing In Eighteenth Century England Andrew O. Winckles Wayne State University, Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/oa_dissertations Recommended Citation Winckles, Andrew O., "Drawn Out In Love: Religious Experience, The ubP lic Sphere, And Evangelical Lay Women's Writing In Eighteenth Century England" (2013). Wayne State University Dissertations. Paper 810. This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@WayneState. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wayne State University Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@WayneState. DRAWN OUT IN LOVE: RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE, THE PUBLIC SPHERE, AND EVANGELICAL LAY WOMEN’S WRITING IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND by ANDREW O. WINCKLES DISSERTATION Submitted to the Graduate School of Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY 2013 MAJOR: ENGLISH Approved By: _________________________________________ Advisor Date _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ © COPYRIGHT BY ANDREW O. WINCKLES 2013 All Rights Reserved DEDICATION For Christy, who continues to fight for religious women’s voices to be heard. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have happened without the support of numerous individuals at three institutions over the course of ten years. First, many thanks go to Marsha Daigle- Williamson, Brent Cline, Paul Patton, Robert Woods, and Mary Darling at Spring Arbor University for fostering my passion for learning during my undergraduate years and encouraging me to go to graduate school in the first place.
    [Show full text]
  • Jonathan Edwards' Experimental Calvinism: Pastors Learning Revival Harmony of Theology and Experience from a Leader in the Great Awakening
    JOURNAL A Quarterly for Church Leadership VOLUME 12 . NUMBER 3 . SUMMER 2003 Jonathan Edwards' Experimental Calvinism: Pastors Learning Revival Harmony of Theology and Experience from a Leader in the Great Awakening Robert D. Smart onathan Edwards, concerned over the degradation and polarization of a beautiful harmony between Calvinistic Jtheology and revival experience-between reformation and revival-became a pastoral leader and mediator who sought to maintain the revival harmony of these two treasured ideals during the Great Awakening. Character defects and defective revival experiences in New England's predominantly Calvinis­ tic congregations increasingly reflected a disproportioned1 Calvinism. One defect involved having much discovery of God's love and grace without a proportionate discovery of his awful majesty and holiness, which tends to lead to pride and presumption. The other was that having discovered God's holy majesty, without a proportionate discovery of his love and grace, tends to unbelief and oppression.2 Edwards' revival leadership, expressed in his published narratives and sermons on revival-experience, countered this polarization with an . apologetic display of experimental delight in God's Excellen­ cies, "tempered together" and "duly proportioned one to another. /I Herein, we may discover the Edwardsean genius of Experimental Calvinism offering today's pastors and congre­ gation wisdom and guidance. Imagine an army of Calvinistic pastors leading many into proportional discoveries of God's Excellencies in an experimental manner! 96 JONATHAN EDWARDS' EXPERIMENTAL CALVINISM JONATHAN EDWARDS' EXPERIMENTAL CALVINISM 97 Jones said of Edwards, "He knew more about experimental WHAT IS EDWARDS' EXPERIMENTAL CALVINISM? religion than most men. It is essentially experimental, essen­ tially practical.
    [Show full text]
  • Covenant of Redemption in the Theology of Jonathan Edwards: the Nexus Between the Immanent and the Economic Trinity
    CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY COVENANT OF REDEMPTION IN THE THEOLOGY OF JONATHAN EDWARDS: THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE IMMANENT AND THE ECONOMIC TRINITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY REITA YAZAWA GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN MAY 2013 CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 3233 Burton SE • Grand Rapids, Michigan • 49546~4301 800 388-6034 fax: 616 957-8621 [email protected] www. calvinseminary. edu This dissertation entitled COVENANT OF REDEMPTION IN THE THEOLOGY OF JONATHAN EDWARDS: THE NEXUS BETWEEN THE IMMANENT AND THE ECONOMIC TRINITY written by REITA YAZAWA and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy has been accepted by the faculty of Calvin Theological Seminary upon the recommendation of the undersigned readers: /' ~George M. Marsden,~a, Ph.D·~. Richard A. Mulier, Ph.D. ~ ... ~ SJeVe:M:StUdebaker, Ph.D. Rona~e~ Date Dean of Academic Programs Copyright © 2013 by Reita Yazawa All rights reserved CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................... vi ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ viii Chapter ONE INTRODUCTION: CRITICISM OF THE IMMANENT TRINITY IN CONTEMPORARY THEOLOGY ........................................................ 1 Present Status of the Problem ..................................................... 1 Statement of the Problem ...........................................................
    [Show full text]