Is 201--An Educational Landmark

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Is 201--An Educational Landmark REPORT RESUMES ED 011 911 U0'003760 I.S. 201 - -AN EDUCATIONAL LANDMARK. BY- GOLDBERG, GERTRUDE S. YESHIVA UNIV., NEW YORK, N.Y., ERICCLEARINGHOUSE ECRS PRICE MF$0.09 HC -$0.64 16P. DESCRIPTORS- COMMUNITY ACTION, *SCHOOL COMMUNITYRELATIONSHIP, COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT, *COMMUNITY INFLUENCE,*SCHOOL SEGREGATION, PERSONNEL SELECTION, PRINCIPALS,*EDUCATIONAL QUALITY) PARENT ATTITUDES, BOARD OFEDUCATION ROLE, BOARD OF EDUCATION POLICY, *DECENTRALIZATION,EDUCATIONAL POLICY, URBAN SCHOOLS, PARENTS, COMMUNITY SCHOOLS,SCHOOL BOYCOTTS, NEW YORK CITY, EAST HARLEM CONTROVERSY OVER NEW YORK CITY'S INTERMEDIATESCHOOL 201 RAISED SOME EDUCATIONAL ISSUES RELEVANTTO ALL SCHOOL CHILDREN:AS WELL AS TO THE SOCIALLYDISADVANTAGED. CONVINCED THAT THE SCHOOL WOULD PROVIDE NEITHERINTEGRATION NOR QUALITY EDUCATION, SOME GHETTO PARENTS SOUGHT "QUALITYSEGREGATED EDUCATION," BASIC TO WHICH WAS COMMUNITYCONTROL OVER EDUCATIONAL POLICY. JOINT RESPONSIBILITY WITHREPRESENTATIVES OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ALLASPECTS OF SCHOOL POLICY WOULD, THEY MAINTAINED, GIVE GHETTOPARENTS POWER COMPARABLE. TO THAT OF WHITE MIDDLECLASS PARENTS. SUCH POWER, PROBABLY NOT EXERCISED BY ANY URBAN PARENTS, WOULDNOT JEOPARDIZE PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS BECAUSE THE BOARD WOULDRETAIN JOINT AUTHORITY, AND THE PRESSURES OF FUNDINGAND ACCREDITATION AGENCIES WOULD PERSIST. OPPOSED BY NEARLYALL CITY -WIDE EDUCATIONAL POWER GROUPS, THE DISSIDENTSBECAME A NEIGHBORHOOD PRESSURE GROUP AND PRESSEDTHEIR ,DEMAND -- UNCONTROVERSIAL PER SE - -FORA BLACK PRINCIPAL AFTER A COMPETENT WHITE PRINCIPAL HAD BEEN APPOINTED. DEFEATED IN AN INITIAL BOYCOTT, THE GROUP SEEMS TOBE GENERALIZING ITS PROTEST TO OTHER NEIGHBORHOODS TOCOMPETE WITK THE CITYWIDE GROUPS WHICH DEFEATED THEM.FRAUGHT WITH DANGERS (CHIEFLY THOSE WHICH WEAKEN THE PRESSUREFOR INTEGRATION), THE STRATEGY OF QUALITY SEGREGATEDEDUCATION THROUGH COMMUNITY CONTROL REPRESENTS "ONE SOUNDALTERNATIVE" TO SOME BASIC PROBLEMS IN URBAN EDUCATION. THISARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED IN "IRCD BULLETIN," VOLUME 2, NUMBER5 AND VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, WINTER'19661967. (AUTHOR) PROJECT BEACON FERKAUF GRADUATE SCHOOL OF HUMANITIES AND IRCD BU I SOCIAL SCIENCES A BI-MONTHLY PUBLICATION 55 Fifth Avenue New York, N. Y. 10003 FROM THE ERIC INFORMATION RETRIEVAL CENTER ON THE DISADVANTAGED Volume IINo. 5 and Volume III No. 1 DOUBLE ISSUEWINTER 1966-1967 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION &WELFARE ED011911 OFFICE OF EDUCATION I.S. 201: AN EDUCATIONAL LANDMARK THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLYAS RECEIVED FROM THE I.S. 201 has become a landmark for reasons other than PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS those which won it an architectural award. The conflict over STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENTOFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION one of the New York's new intermediate schools,' a window- less brick bastion in Harlem, has spread far beyond the walls 'or onePOSITION or uotn OR ozPOLICY. tide ionowing reasons: uecause lE aparea of the ghetto. A controversy which has altered existing to be too deep within the ghetto to be Successfully interated; coalitions and polarized its principals is difficult to analyze or because it was a depressing site, opposite railroatracks without the resources of time and systematic study. (Despite and amidst rundown tenements and storefronts. e Board these inherent handicaps, there have already been several assured them of a creative building and of itegration. perceptive reportorial accounts of the conflict.2 ) But the During the fall of 1965 and early months of 16, parents outlines of the controversy are sufficiently clear to attempt of children who would attend what would betermediate to determine why 201 is a landmark or what about the School 201 and members of interested cornunity groups goals, strategies, and tactics of its actors represent de- pressed the Board for plans of integratioand details of partures from previous efforts to improve the education of the school's program. As it became cle that the school socially disadvantaged children. would be segregated and they were unabto learn definite program plans, these community persos began to develop Quality, Segregated Education: Goal, Sub -Goal, or Strategy? a set of proposals for the new scho1.In the absence of integration, they pressed for "quality gregated education," While attempts to upgrade segregated ghetto schools have which was to be gained through cornnity control over such burgeoned since 1954, the goal of Negro activists and their important aspects of the school's opation as staff selection, white allies has been quality, integrated education. The two curriculum, and evaluation of thecademic program. They aims have been seen. as complementary and, at least in demanded a Negro or Puertoican principal to supply the long run, inseparable. As Whitney Young has stated, the proper image for minority-oup pupils, a well-trained, "There can be no integration of education without quality; integrated teaching staff, welstocked library, etc. They nor can there be any meaningful quality of education without attempted during the springnd summer to obtain support integration." While some figures prominent in the civil rights from powerful allies outsidthe New York City Board of movement have viewed the quest for quality in the ghetto as Education, when it appearethat the Board was not willing a means of making segregation palatable, the majority to negotiate seriously withem. They received no definite position, particularly among educators, has been that commitment of help froany organization or individual emphasis on one of the two interdependent goals is necessary capable of influencing thBoard's decisions. As a result of at any given time or situation. Kenneth Clark, for example, demonstration and protet by Harlem and East Harlem corn- has argued that, "given the intransigence of the white munity groups, the Bord cancelled its plans for opening community and the impossibility of immediate integration," the school on April 1 ay 1, and June 1. to seek higher standards in the ghetto is a "decision to save A week before thopening of school, on September 12, as many Negro children as possible now." Indeed, he main- 1966, serious negotitions began between the Superintendent tains, along with others, that meaningful desegregation can of Schools and me ers of the Board of Education, and what only take place if all of the schoolS involved are raised to became a formalegotiating Committee representing par.. the highest standards. Improvement of ghetto schools is ents and commuty organizations. Since discussions began seen as either a prelude or concomitant of integration. too late to reaca settlement before school opened, during During a period when integration has been the express the first weeof school, children were assigned to the goal of many Northern school systems and compensatory elementary sools which they had attended the previous efforts have been numerous, neither quality nor integration year.Begi ng Monday, September 19, children were has measurably increased. On the contrary, segregation in assigned wi their teachers to an old school which still the schools of the North has increased and achievement had furnitue. However, most of the 201 teachers, acting (continued on page 2) through thlocal chapter of their union (the United Federa- tion of achers) refused to conduct classes in the old 'An intermediate school serves children from fifth through school. eighth grades. This type of school has been developed in An reenient between the Negotiating Committee and accordance with the New York City Board of Education's the Bo rd was reached Monday afternoon. Basically, corn- "4-4-4 plan" for reorganizing the grade structure of the munitrepresentatives would be jointly responsible along school system in order to facilitate racial integration. withersons designated by the Board of Education for oper ting I.S. 201. The Board first reftised, then evidently 2lmmediately following this discussion is a bibliography acq iesced in the demand of the Negotiating Committeethat of articles dealing specifically with the conflict over I.S. (continued on page 2) 201. A Summary of the Controversy at I.S. 201 (continued from page 1) alternative plan for operating LS. 201. A boardcomposed of university representatives and representatives ofparents the appointed white principal be replaced bya Negro or and community groups would constitute a nine-member Puerto Rican. It was reported that the appointee hadvol- operation board for the schools. The school system would untarily requested reassignment, and the ranking assistant contract with the board to run L S. 201 and its feedersele- principal, who happened to be Negro, was toserve as the mentary schools. The Board subsequently turned downthe acting principal. Following the Monday agreement, the Super- key portion of the Clark plan, for it refused to acquiescein intendent of Schools and the Chairman of the Negotiating "selection and transfer of personnel or authority to direct Committee announced that a settlement had been reached, the work of the School." On October 20, the Board issued and the latter pledged to bring her child to 201the next a statement in which the community group was offeredan day. advisory role in relation to LS. 201, and it also 'proposed The 201 teachers meanwhile urged the Board.not to to appoint a high-level Task Force to Advance Education in accept the appointed principal's request fora transfer and Disadvantaged Areas. The Task Force would be asked to on Tuesday, September 20, picketed I.S. 201 and the Board
Recommended publications
  • IRCD IIU of EDUCATION YESHIVA UNIVERSITY a BI-MONTHLY PUBLICATION 55 Fifth Avenue New York, N
    REPORT RESUMES ED 011 910 UD 003 757 RACIAL DESEGREGATION AND INTEGRATION IN OURSCHOOLS. YESHIVA UNIV., NEW YORK, N.Y., ERIC CLEARINGHOUSE ERRS PRICE MF-$0.09 HC-$0.36 9P. DESCRIPTORS- *BIBLIOGRAPHIES, *SCHOOLINTEGRATION, INTEGRATION METHODS, DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS, PROGRAMEVALUATION, STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS, INTEGRATION PLANS,INTEGRATION LITIGATION, ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT, INTEGRATION EFFECTS,*INTEGRATION STUDIES, PROGRAMS, NEW YORK CITY THE PLAN OF THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY ISOUTLINED IN AN INTRODUCTORY NOTE WHICH BRIEFLY DISCUSSESTHE STATUS OF RACIAL DESEGREGATION AND INTEGRATION IN THE SCHOOLS.ONE SECTION OF THE BIBLIOGRAPHY IDENTIFIES SOMEREPORTS AND DISCUSSIONS OF DESEGREGATION EFFORTS.A SECOND AND BRIEFER ONE BRINGS TOGETHER ARTICLES WHICH DEALWITH THE LEGAL DECISIONS ON WHICH SCHOOL DESEGREGATIONIS BASED. THE THIRD AND MAJOR SECTION, WHICH IS ADDRESSEDTO SOCIAL PLANNERS AS WELL AS RESEARCH WORKERS, CITES REPORTSOf SPECIAL PROJECTS WHICH DEAL WITH PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ASPECTSOF DESEGREGATION OR ITS IMPACT, REPORTS OFEVALUATIONS OF PROGRAMS, AND A FEW STUDIES RELATED TO PUPIL CHARACTERISTICS OR PUPIL FUNCTIONING UNDER DESEGREGATION CONDITIONS.THE MORE THAN 140 PUBLISHED AND UNPUBLISHED WORKS CITED IN THIS BIBLIOGRAPHY WERE PRODUCED DURING THE 1960'S.THIS ARTICLE WAS PUBLISHED IN "IRO BULLETIN," VOLUME 1, NUMBER 4, SEPTEMBER 1965. (JL) Ir.% VLUI s PROJECT BEACON FERKAUF GRADUATE SCHOOL IRCD IIU OF EDUCATION YESHIVA UNIVERSITY A BI-MONTHLY PUBLICATION 55 Fifth Avenue New York, N. Y. 10003 FROM THE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL CENTER ON THE DISADVANTAGED VOLUME I, Number 4 1EPTEMBER 1965 ED011910.<-i''') QUALITY INTEGRATED EDUCATION RACIAL DESEGREGATION AND INTEGRATION..- ik IN OUR SCHOOLS 9 In a few communities in the North, the modifier "Quality" In our lead article Dr. Doxey A. Wilkerson, Associate has recently been added to the "Integrated Educatio Professor of Education, Yeshiva University has briefly demand of the civil rights movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday Report University Publications and Campus Newsletters
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston 1991-1996, Friday Report University Publications and Campus Newsletters 10-22-1993 Friday Report - Vol. 03, No. 8 - October 22, 1993 University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/university_fridayreport Part of the Higher Education Administration Commons, and the Organizational Communication Commons Recommended Citation University of Massachusetts Boston, "Friday Report - Vol. 03, No. 8 - October 22, 1993" (1993). 1991-1996, Friday Report. Paper 53. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/university_fridayreport/53 This University Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the University Publications and Campus Newsletters at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1991-1996, Friday Report by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The UMass Boston Friday Report Volume 3, Number 8 News and information about and for the October 22, 1993 University Community from the Chancellor's Office Substantial Increases in Minority Enrollment Recorded The proportion of students of color attending UMass Boston has increased from a year ago. African American, Latino, Asian American and Native American students now comprise 27.5% of the University's degree-seeking undergraduates, up from 25.1% last fall. Among degree-seeking graduate students, 12.2% are minorities compared to 11.4% last year. Significant increases in students of color have also been recorded in two other categories: new freshmen, from 35% to 40.4%; and new transfers, from 19% to 23.3%. Overall, students of color this fall account for 24.1% of the total enrollment of 12,136, compared to 22.2% last year.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Education, and Teacher Education. Projeci Listings Include
    I DOCUMENT RE SUME ED 022 242 EA 001 590 By -Muliins, Elizabeth, Comp.; Miller, Richard I.. Ed. A DIRECTORY OF INDIVIDUALS, PROGRAMS, AND AGENCIES ENGAGED IN THE STUDY OFCHANGE, 1967 EDITION. National Inst. for the Study of Educational Change, E3loofungton, Ind. Pub Date 67 Note-120p. EDRS Price MF-$050 HC-$4.88 Descriptors- *AGENCIES, CHANGE AGENTS, *DIRECTORIES, *EDUCATIONAL CHANGE, EDUCATIONALRESEARCH, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHERS, *PERSONNEL, *PROJECTS, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTCENTERS, SOCIAL CHANGE As a tool to assist in the implementation of constructive educational change, a national directory was prepared of people, programs. and projects deahng with some phase of the change process. The directory includes 367 listings in thethree general categories of people (196), agencies (104), and protects(67). People are further categorizedunderthefieldsofanthropology,education(subdividedunder associations, colleges. corporations,elementary and secondary specialties, foundations, federal government, and state government), international development, political science, psychology, rural sociology, and sociology. Agency listingsinclude administrationand leadership,basici esearch andgeneralstudiescurriculum development; development, demonstrailon, diffusion, group dynamics andhuman relations; higher education, international studies and deve!opment, state departments of education, and teacher education. Projecilistingsinclude administration and organization, curriculum development, deprived and disadvantagedyouth. information r_enters; research, theory.
    [Show full text]
  • November 2007 Number 8
    VOLUME 35 NOVEMBER 2007 NUMBER 8 ASA Files Complaint Against the U.S. Government for British Boycott Excluding South African Scholar from the United States Threat Sparks Since then, Professor Habib has nurtures scientific development to the The American Civil Liberties (ACLU), informed the U.S. government of benefit of the larger society. Academic ASA Council on behalf of the American Sociological upcoming invitations to speak at U.S. freedom is the hallmark of American Association (ASA) and four other events hosted by the ASA, AAUP, ADC, democratic culture. It has allowed sci- Action associations, filed a legal complaint on ADC-MA, and the BCPR, but his visa entists, intellectuals, and their scholarly September 25, 2007, against the United application continues to languish with- societies to flourish and create one of The American Sociological States government for excluding promi- out explanation. Habib is an American- the world’s most dynamic educational Association’s governing Council nent South African scholar Adam Habib educated PhD and is the Deputy systems and robust knowledge-based approved an official policy state- from entering the United States. The law- Vice-Chancellor of Research, Innovation economies. ASA opposes the use of visa meant at its August 15, 2007, meet- suit, filed with the U.S. District Court in and Advancement at the University of denials or de facto denials, in general, ing that was prompted by, and in Boston, seeks clarification of rights rela- Johannesburg. He is also a Muslim of based on ideological grounds, because opposition to, the renewed effort last tive to free speech, constitutional guar- Indian descent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Commencement Program (PDF)
    One Hundred and Fifty-Ninth Annual Commencement JUNE 16, 2017 One Hundred and Fifty-Ninth Annual Commencement 9:30 A.M., FRIDAY, JUNE 16, 2017 Ryan Field Evanston, Illinois UNIVERSITY SEAL AND MOTTO Soon after Northwestern University was redesigned the seal, retaining the book and the date of its founding. This seal, founded, its Board of Trustees adopted and light rays and adding two quotations. which remains Northwestern’s official an official corporate seal. This seal, On the pages of the open book he placed signature, was approved by the Board approved on June 26, 1856, consisted of a Greek quotation from the Gospel of of Trustees on December 5, 1890. an open book surrounded by rays of light John, chapter 1, verse 14, translating and circled by the words North western to The Word . full of grace and truth. The full text of the University motto, University, Evanston, Illinois. Circling the book are the first three adopted on June 17, 1890, is from words, in Latin, of the University motto: the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Thirty years later Daniel Bonbright, Quaecumque sunt vera (What soever Philippians, chapter 4, verse 8 (King professor of Latin and a member things are true). The outer border of the James Version). of Northwestern’s original faculty, seal carries the name of the University Whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Boston Controlled Choice Student Assignment Plan: a Reanalysis and Interpretation of the Bain and Company Study
    Evaluation of the Boston Controlled Choice Student Assignment Plan: A Reanalysis and Interpretation of the Bain and Company Study by Charles V. Willie Professor of Education and Urban Studies Graduate School of Education Harvard University • 1996 ! The Boston school desegregation experience has been writ large in books, articles and newspapers of this nation. J. Anthony Lukas chronicled the trials and tribulations of desegregation in a best­ selling book entitled Common Ground (1985) . David Halberstan called it a bittersweet book on the end of an American dream. Robert Dentler and Marvin Scott, court experts who prepared an inside account of the Boston Desegregation case called Schools on Trial (1981), said "Boston's notorious school desegregation conflict was regarded as the type that no one in his right mind would want to take place in his city. 'Don't let this become another Boston' was the slogan that spread from New York City to Los Angeles" (Denter and Scott 1981:x). Actually, the Boston school desegregation plan ordered by the U.S. District Court in 1975 had some "educationally beneficial and even novel" components, according to education planners, Dentler and Scott; they also state that the implementation of the plan was 11 overwhelmingly peaceful and successful 11 but that few heard of these aspects of the plan because "no one was listening" (Dentler and Scott 1981:x). After thirteen years of court-ordered and court -monitored school desegregation, the U.S. District Court gave Boston the privilege of developing a new student assignment plan. However, the Court explicitly stated that the new plan would not be acceptable if it resegregated the Boston Public Schools.
    [Show full text]
  • SOCIOLOGICAL PRACTICE NEWSLETTER Prepared for the American Sociological Association Section on Sociological Practice Summer 2006 ______Editor’S Commentary
    SOCIOLOGICAL PRACTICE NEWSLETTER Prepared for the American Sociological Association Section on Sociological Practice Summer 2006 _____________________________________________________________ Editor’s commentary Chair: Transitions for the Section Eleanor Lyon [email protected] Reflected in this Issue University of Connecticut By KATHRYN GOLDMAN SCHUYLER Chair-Elect: Alliant International University Kristine J. Ajrouch [email protected] This issue is a rich one, so here are highlights to guide Eastern Michigan University you through it. Past Chair: There is lots of news: you’ll read about a new inter- Jay Weinstein [email protected] disciplinary MS in Applied African American Studies (p. 3), Eastern Michigan University descriptions of upcoming conferences (p. 4), practice-related sessions and meetings at the Montreal ASA meeting (p. 6), Secretary: the revised Directory of Programs in Applied Sociology and Leora Lawton [email protected] Practice (p. 9), announcements of members’ books (p. 9), TechSociety Research and a new journal coming from AACS (page 12). Council: Members share discussions of their current work (Notes Terms ending 2006: from the Field). Judith Jones discusses charter schools in Cynthia L. Sipe [email protected] Maine (p. 5). Robert Dotzler invites comments about Theodore A. Lamb [email protected] focusing on practice in teaching Introductory Sociology (p. Ann Marie Charvat [email protected] 11). We learn how Ross Koppel’s research caused the Terms ending 2007: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) to A. Troy Adams, [email protected] spend $320 million improving access to buses (p.13). Lynetta M. Mosby [email protected] Our members reflect on issues of broad impact, with J. Steven Picou [email protected] thoughts on the recent ASA Survey of practitioners from our Terms ending 2008: outgoing chair Eleanor Lyon (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Where It's Happening. a Selective Guide to Continuing Programs Funded by the United States Office of Education
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 042 001 VT 010 318 AUTHOR relley, Clarice Y. TITLE Where It's Happening. A Selective Guide to Continuing Programs Funded by the United States Office of Education. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DHFW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 68 NOTE 64p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$3.30 DESCRIPTORS *Educational Finance, *Educational Research, *Federal Aid, *Federal Programs, Indexes (Locaters), Instructional Materials Centers, Reference Materialsi Regional Programs, Research and Development Centers, Research Coordinating Units, *Research Projects ABSTRACT This booklet has been prepared as an aid in sorting out the long-term projects funded by the United States Office of Education. Sections are:(1) Regional Educational Laboratories, (2) Research and Development Centers, (3) Educational Policy Research Centers,(4) Regional Research Program: Small Project Research, (5) Research Coordinating Units for Vocational Education, (6) Instructional Materials Centers for Handicapped Children and Youth, and (7) Educational Resources Information Centers. Each section begins with a short explanation, followed by the address and telephone numbers of project directors. In most cases, the projects are described and their location is illustrated on a map. An index is included. (SB) 1 I c a I I AINIPN,11 .11.111MIPIINIMMeft KIER E IT'S HAPPENING A Selective Guide to Continuing Programs Funded by the United States Office of Education CLARICE Y. KELLEY U.S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE it OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECES- SARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU- CATION POSITION OR POUCY 1 DOUBLEDAY & COMPANY, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms International 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 USA St
    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Issues Facing Boston: 1984, a Summary Robert A
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston John M. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Global Studies Publications Studies 1-1-1984 Policy Issues Facing Boston: 1984, A Summary Robert A. Corrigan University of Massachusetts Boston Edmund Beard University of Massachusetts Boston John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/mccormack_pubs Part of the Public Administration Commons, Public Policy Commons, and the Urban Studies Commons Recommended Citation Corrigan, Robert A.; Beard, Edmund; and John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs, University of Massachusetts Boston, "Policy Issues Facing Boston: 1984, A Summary" (1984). John M. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies Publications. Paper 1. http://scholarworks.umb.edu/mccormack_pubs/1 This Research Report is brought to you for free and open access by the McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies at ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. It has been accepted for inclusion in John M. McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies Publications by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at UMass Boston. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POLICY ISSUES FACING BOSTON: 1984 A SUMMARY John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs University of Mass. /Boston January, 1984 Policy Issues Facing Boston: 1984 A Summary John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs University of Mass/Boston January, 1984 Robert A. Corrigan Chancellor Edmund Beard Director Policy Issues Facing Boston: 1984 In the Fall of 1983 the John W. McCormack Institute of Public Affairs asked a number of experts in various fields from within and outside the University to prepare an analysis of the major policy issues facing the City of Boston in 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • The Education of African-Americans. INSTITUTION Massachusetts Univ., Boston, MA
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 415 311 UD 032 091 AUTHOR Willie, Charles V., Ed.; Garibaldi, Antoine M., Ed.; Reed, Wornie L., Ed. TITLE Assessment of the Status of African-Americans. Volume III: The Education of African-Americans. INSTITUTION Massachusetts Univ., Boston, MA. William Monroe Trotter Inst. ISBN ISBN-1-878358-00-6 PUB DATE 1990-00-00 NOTE 191p.; For Volumes I through VI, see UD 032 089-094. PUB TYPE Collected Works General (020) Reports Evaluative (142) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Black Education; *Black Students; Civil Rights; Counseling; *Educational Attainment; Educational Change; Educational History; Elementary Secondary Education; *Higher Education; Minority Groups; Participation; Public Schools; *School Desegregation; *Urban Schools IDENTIFIERS *African Americans; National Research Council ABSTRACT In 1987 a project was undertaken to assess the status of African Americans in the United States in the topical areas to be addressed by the National Research Council's Study Committee on the Status of Black Americans: education, employment, income and occupations, political participation and the administration of justice, social and cultural change, health status and medical care, and the family. Six volumes resulted from the study. This volume, the third, considers education, ranging from early childhood through postsecondary education. The following essays are included: (1) "The Civil Rights Movement and Educational Change" (Meyer Weinberg); (2) "The Social and Historical Context: A Case Study of Philanthropic Assistance" (Charles V. Willie); (3) "School Desegregation since Gunnar Myrdal's American Dilemma" (Robert A. Dentler); (4) "The Future of School Desegregation" (Charles V. Willie); (5) "Meeting the Needs of Black Children in Public Schools: A School Reform Challenge" (James P.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Busing Failed: Race, Media, and the National Resistance to School Desegregation (University of California Press, Forthcoming February 2016)
    Matthew F. Delmont Why Busing Failed: Race, Media, and the National Resistance to School Desegregation (University of California Press, forthcoming February 2016) Introduction “Busing has been a failure in Boston,” the Boston Globe informed readers in 1994, on the twentieth anniversary of the start of court-ordered desegregation in the city. “It achieved neither integration nor better schooling.”1 Speaking to a group of Chicago educators in 1981, assistant United States attorney general for civil rights William Bradford Reynolds offered a similar assessment: “Forced busing has, in the final analysis, largely failed in two major respects. It has failed to gain needed public acceptance and it has failed to translate into enhanced educational achievement.”2 Reynolds, who played a central role in articulating and carrying out the Reagan administration’s civil rights policies, found company from across the political spectrum in describing “busing” for school desegregation as a misguided policy. Running unsuccessfully for President in 1976, Ronald Reagan told voters that “school busing has failed miserably. It has created bitterness, not eliminated it.”3 A year earlier, Democratic Senator Joe Biden described “busing” as a “bankrupt concept” that violated “the cardinal rule of common sense” and introduced two successful “antibusing” amendments in the Senate.4 Biden’s perceptive on “busing” unintentionally echoed that of the 1972 National Black Political Convention resolution that characterized “busing” as “a bankrupt, suicidal method of desegregating
    [Show full text]