DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Legal Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Legal Document Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page1 of 174 15-1606 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Docket No. 15-1606 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, INC., PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE, VETERANS FOR PEACE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, —v.— UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, and its components DEPARTMENT OF ARMY, DEPARTMENT OF NAVY, DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE, DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendants-Appellants. (Caption continued on inside cover) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME I OF II (Pages JA-1 to JA-169) GIBBONS P.C. PREET BHARARA, Attorney for Plaintiffs-Appellees. United States Attorney for the One Gateway Center Southern District of New York, Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 Attorney for Defendants- (973) 596-4731 Appellants. 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10007 (212) 637-2703 Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page2 of 174 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF STATE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and its Components CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION, CRIMINAL DIVISION, OFFICE OF INFORMATION AND PRIVACY, OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE, POLICY AND REVIEW, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants. Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page3 of 174 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Civil Docket Sheet for Case No. 04 Civ. 4151(AKH) (S.D.N.Y.) ...................... JA-1 Declaration of Richard B. Myers in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment with attachments dated July 28, 2005. ..................................................... JA-62 Declaration of Michael E. Pheneger dated August 11, 2005 ............................................................................. JA-90 Second Amended Declaration of Richard B. Myers in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment with attachments dated August 29, 2005 ................................................. JA-95 Opinion and Order of Judge Hellerstein dated September 29, 2005, granting in part and denying in part Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ........................ JA-120 Declaration of Carter F. Ham dated April 26, 2006 .............................................................................. JA-170 Declaration of Michael E. Pheneger dated May 19, 2006 ............................................................................... JA-183 Declaration of Khaled Fahmy dated May 19, 2006 ............................................................................... JA-191 Certification of the Secretary of Defense dated November 13, 2009 ...................................................................... JA-196 Conference Summary: Homeland Security Appropriations dated October 7, 2009 ............................................................................ JA-197 Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page4 of 174 Transcript of Proceedings of Oral Argument held on July 20, 2011, before Judge Hellerstein ................................... JA-202 Certification Renewal of the Secretary of Defense dated November 9, 2012 ........................................................................ JA-240 Order and Opinion of Judge Hellerstein dated August 27, 2014, granting, in part, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and denying Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ........................... JA-241 Transcript of Proceedings of Conference held on October 21, 2014, before Judge Hellerstein ..................................... JA-264 Declaration of Megan M. Weis dated December 19, 2014 ...................................................................... JA-280 Exhibit A: Memorandum from General John R. Allen dated October 28, 2012 .......................................................................... JA-286 Exhibit B: Memorandum from General James N. Mattis dated October 29, 2012 .......................................................................... JA-289 Exhibit C: Memorandum from General Martin E. Dempsey ................ JA-291 Declaration of Rear Admiral Sinclair M. Harris in Support of Seventh Motion for Summary Judgment dated December 19, 2014 ..................................................... JA-293 Transcript of Proceedings of Conference held on February 4, 2015, before Judge Hellerstein ...................................... JA-301 ii Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page5 of 174 Order of Judge Hellerstein dated February 18, 2015 clarifying instructions for defendants’ submissions .............................. JA-327 Order of Judge Hellerstein dated March 20, 2015, granting judgment for plaintiff .............................................................. JA-330 Order of Final Judgment by Judge Hellerstein dated April 1, 2015, in favor of plaintiffs with regard to all responsive photographs ................................................................ JA-333 Notice of Appeal dated May 15, 2015 ............................................................. JA-335 iii Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page6 of 174 SDNY CM/ECF Version 5.1.1 JA-1 Page 1 of 61 CLOSED,APPEAL,ECF U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:04-cv-04151-AKH American Civil Liberties Union et al v. Department of Defense et al Date Filed: 06/02/2004 Assigned to: Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein Date Terminated: 09/28/2012 Related Cases: 1:09-cv-05413-AKH Jury Demand: None 1:10-cv-07092-AKH Nature of Suit: 895 Freedom of Information Act Cause: 05:552 Freedom of Information Act Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant Date Filed # Docket Text 06/02/2004 1 COMPLAINT against Central Intelligence Agency, Department Of Homeland Security, Department Of Justice, Department of Defense, Department of State. (Filing Fee $ 150.00, Receipt Number 510269) Document filed by American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc., Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, Veterans for Peace.(gf, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2004 (gf, ). (Entered: 06/03/2004) 06/02/2004 SUMMONS ISSUED as to Central Intelligence Agency, Department Of Homeland Security, Department Of Justice, Department of Defense, Department of State. (gf, ) (Entered: 06/03/2004) 06/02/2004 Magistrate Judge Douglas F. Eaton is so designated. (gf, ) (Entered: 06/03/2004) 06/02/2004 Case Designated ECF. (gf, ) (Entered: 06/03/2004) 06/29/2004 ***REJECTION OF ATTEMPTED PAPER FILING IN ECF CASE. The following document(s) affidavit of service by Lawrence S. Lustberg, was rejected by the Clerk's Office and must be FILED ELECTRONICALLY on the Court's ECF System. (snu, ) (Entered: 07/02/2004) 07/06/2004 2 FIRST MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Document filed by American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc., Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, Veterans for Peace. (Ching, Jennifer) (Entered: 07/06/2004) 07/06/2004 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Document filed by American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc., Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, Veterans for Peace. (Ching, Jennifer) (Entered: 07/06/2004) 07/06/2004 4 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction. Document filed by American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc., Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, Veterans for Peace. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit # 2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit # 4 Exhibit # 5 Exhibit # 6 Exhibit # 7 Exhibit # 8 Exhibit # 9 Exhibit # 10 Exhibit # 11 Exhibit # 12 Exhibit # 13 Exhibit)(Ching, Jennifer) (Entered: 07/06/2004) 07/06/2004 5 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants.Document filed by American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Inc., Physicians for Human Rights, Veterans for Common Sense, Veterans for Peace. (Attachments: # 1 Supplement)(Ching, Jennifer) (Entered: 07/06/2004) 07/06/2004 ***REJECTION OF ATTEMPTED PAPER FILING IN ECF CASE. The following document(s) notice of motion and declaration by Lawrence Lustberg, was rejected by the Clerk's Office and must be FILED ELECTRONICALLY on the Court's ECF System. (snu, ) (Entered: 07/09/2004) 07/28/2004 6 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein from Sean H. Lane dated 7/22/04. Defendants' time to respond to the amended complaint is extended to 7/30/04. Defendants' Response to plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction due by 7/30/2004. Reply due by 8/6/2004. Oral Argument set for 8/12/2004 03:00 PM before Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 7/27/04) (kw, ) (Entered: 07/28/2004) 07/28/2004 Set Answer Due Date purs. to 6 Endorsed Letter,, Set Scheduling Order Deadlines, as to Central Intelligence Agency answer due on 7/30/2004; Department Of Homeland Security answer due on 7/30/2004; Department Of Justice answer due on 7/30/2004; Department of Defense answer due on 7/30/2004; Department of State answer due on 7/30/2004. (kw, ) (Entered: 07/28/2004) 07/30/2004 7 https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?251351191418863-L_1_0-1 6/30/2015 Case 15-1606, Document 70, 07/09/2015, 1550412, Page7 of 174 SDNY CM/ECF Version 5.1.1 JA-2 Page 2 of 61 ANSWER to Amended Complaint. Document filed by Central Intelligence Agency, Department Of Homeland Security, Department Of Justice, Department of Defense, Department of State. Related document: 5 Amended Complaint, filed by
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Islam-2010/06/24 1
    ISLAM-2010/06/24 1 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION JOURNEY INTO AMERICA: THE CHALLENGE OF ISLAM Washington, D.C. Thursday, June 24, 2010 PARTICIPANTS: Introduction and Moderator: STEPHEN GRAND Fellow and Director, U.S. Relations with the Islamic World The Brookings Institution Featured Speaker: AKBAR AHMED Nonresident Senior Fellow, The Brookings Institution Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies, American University Panelist: IMAM MOHAMED MAGID Vice President Islamic Society of North America * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 ISLAM-2010/06/24 2 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. GRAND: Welcome, everyone. We are very pleased that so many of you were able to join us today, for what I think is going to be a fascinating Journey into America, to paraphrase from the book, to quote from the book. And what I hope will also be a fascinating discussion here today. My name is Steve Grand. For those who don’t know me, I’m the director of the project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World here at Brookings, and it is our great honor, along with Brookings Press, to be able to hold this book launch even today for Professor Ahmed’s Journey into America. Copies of the book I should mention will be available for sale after this outside, and Professor Ahmed will be kind enough to sign books as people leave. This Journey into America that Professor Ahmed takes us through today, will take us through today and takes us through in his book, is really a sequel.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambassador Akbar Ahmed, Phd Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies School of International Service, American University
    Ambassador Akbar Ahmed ­ Curriculum Vitae Ambassador Akbar Ahmed, PhD Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies School of International Service, American University Address School of International Service, American University 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20016 Office: (202) 885­1641/1961 Fax: (202) 885­2494 E­Mail: [email protected] ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Education 2013 Honorary Doctorate, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan 2007 Honorary Doctor of Laws, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 1994 Master of Arts, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 1978 Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, London, UK. 1965 Diploma Education, Selwyn College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2 Distinctions). 1964 Bachelor of Social Sciences, Honors, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK (Economics and Sociology). 1961 Bachelor of Arts, Punjab University, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan (Gold Medal: History and English). 1957­59 Senior Cambridge (1st Division, 4 Distinctions)/Higher Senior Cambridge (4 'A' levels, 2 Distinctions), Burn Hall, Abbottabad. Professional Career 2012 Diane Middlebrook and Carl Djerassi Visiting Professor, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Michaelmas Term). 2009­ Distinguished Visiting Affiliate, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 1 Ambassador Akbar Ahmed ­ Curriculum Vitae 2008­2009 First Distinguished Chair for Middle East/Islamic Studies, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 2006­2013 Non­Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC. 2005­2006 Visiting Fellow at Brookings Institution, Washington DC ­­ Principal Investigator for “Islam in the Age of Globalization”, a project supported by American University, The Brookings Institution, and The Pew Research Center. 2001­ Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies and Professor of International Relations, School of International Service, American University, Washington DC.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae 1 Akbar Ahmed, Phd Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic
    Akbar Ahmed - Curriculum Vitae Akbar Ahmed, PhD Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies School of International Service, American University 4400 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington DC 20016 Office: (202) 885-1641/1961 Fax: (202) 885-2494 E-Mail: [email protected] Education 2007 Honorary Doctor of Laws, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. 1994 Master of Arts, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 1978 Doctor of Philosophy, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, London, UK. 1965 Diploma Education, Selwyn College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2 Distinctions). 1964 Bachelor of Social Sciences, Honors, Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK (Economics and Sociology). 1961 Bachelor of Arts, Punjab University, Forman Christian College, Lahore, Pakistan (Gold Medal: First in History and English). 1957-59 Senior Cambridge (1st Division, 4 Distinctions)/Higher Senior Cambridge (4 'A' levels, 2 Distinctions), Burn Hall, Abbottabad. Professional Career 2012 Diane Middlebrook and Carl Djerassi Visiting Professor, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (Michaelmas Term). 2009- Distinguished Visiting Affiliate, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 2008-2009 First Distinguished Chair for Middle East/Islamic Studies, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, MD. 2006- Non-Resident Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution, Washington DC. 2005-2006 Visiting Fellow at Brookings Institution, Washington DC -- Principal Investigator for “Islam in the Age of Globalization”, a project supported by American University, The Brookings Institution, and The Pew Research Center. 2001- Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies and Professor of International Relations, School of International Service, American University, Washington DC. 1 Akbar Ahmed - Curriculum Vitae 2000-2001 Visiting Professor, Department of Anthropology, and Stewart Fellow of the Humanities Council at Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.5 Akbar Ahmed, Ibn Khaldun's Understanding of Civilizations And
    Ibn Khaldun's Understanding of Civilizations and the Dilemmas of Islam and the West Today Author(s): Akbar Ahmed Source: Middle East Journal, Vol. 56, No. 1 (Winter, 2002), pp. 20-45 Published by: Middle East Institute Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4329719 Accessed: 07/02/2009 09:34 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=mei. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Middle East Institute is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Middle East Journal. http://www.jstor.org Ibn Khaldun'sUnderstanding of Civilizationsand the Dilemmasof Islamand the WestToday AkbarAhmed In the wakeof the September11 attacks,new attentionis beingpaid to bothsides of the debateover the competingideas of a "clashof civilizations"and thatof a "dialogueof civilizations;" in thisarticle, Ibn Khaldun's analysis of civilizations is examinedin the contextof the dilemmasfaced by Islam and the Westtoday.
    [Show full text]
  • The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch Relationship in the United States
    The Donald Trump-Rupert Murdoch relationship in the United States When Donald Trump ran as a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, Rupert Murdoch was reported to be initially opposed to him, so the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post were too.1 However, Roger Ailes and Murdoch fell out because Ailes wanted to give more positive coverage to Trump on Fox News.2 Soon afterwards, however, Fox News turned more negative towards Trump.3 As Trump emerged as the inevitable winner of the race for the nomination, Murdoch’s attitude towards Trump appeared to shift, as did his US news outlets.4 Once Trump became the nominee, he and Rupert Murdoch effectively concluded an alliance of mutual benefit: Murdoch’s news outlets would help get Trump elected, and then Trump would use his powers as president in ways that supported Rupert Murdoch’s interests. An early signal of this coming together was Trump’s public attacks on the AT&T-Time Warner merger, 21st Century Fox having tried but failed to acquire Time Warner previously in 2014. Over the last year and a half, Fox News has been the major TV news supporter of Donald Trump. Its coverage has displayed extreme bias in his favour, offering fawning coverage of his actions and downplaying or rubbishing news stories damaging to him, while also leading attacks against Donald Trump’s opponent in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton. Ofcom itself ruled that several Sean Hannity programmes in August 2016 were so biased in favour of Donald Trump and against Hillary Clinton that they breached UK impartiality rules.5 During this period, Rupert Murdoch has been CEO of Fox News, in which position he is also 1 See e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2020 Election 2 Contents
    Covering the Coverage The 2020 Election 2 Contents 4 Foreword 29 Us versus him Kyle Pope Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 5 Why did Matt Drudge turn on August 10, 2020 Donald Trump? Bob Norman 37 The campaign begins (again) January 29, 2020 Kyle Pope August 12, 2020 8 One America News was desperate for Trump’s approval. 39 When the pundits paused Here’s how it got it. Simon van Zuylen–Wood Andrew McCormick Summer 2020 May 27, 2020 47 Tuned out 13 The story has gotten away from Adam Piore us Summer 2020 Betsy Morais and Alexandria Neason 57 ‘This is a moment for June 3, 2020 imagination’ Mychal Denzel Smith, Josie Duffy 22 For Facebook, a boycott and a Rice, and Alex Vitale long, drawn-out reckoning Summer 2020 Emily Bell July 9, 2020 61 How to deal with friends who have become obsessed with 24 As election looms, a network conspiracy theories of mysterious ‘pink slime’ local Mathew Ingram news outlets nearly triples in size August 25, 2020 Priyanjana Bengani August 4, 2020 64 The only question in news is ‘Will it rate?’ Ariana Pekary September 2, 2020 3 66 Last night was the logical end 92 The Doociness of America point of debates in America Mark Oppenheimer Jon Allsop October 29, 2020 September 30, 2020 98 How careful local reporting 68 How the media has abetted the undermined Trump’s claims of Republican assault on mail-in voter fraud voting Ian W. Karbal Yochai Benkler November 3, 2020 October 2, 2020 101 Retire the election needles 75 Catching on to Q Gabriel Snyder Sam Thielman November 4, 2020 October 9, 2020 102 What the polls show, and the 78 We won’t know what will happen press missed, again on November 3 until November 3 Kyle Pope Kyle Paoletta November 4, 2020 October 15, 2020 104 How conservative media 80 E.
    [Show full text]
  • PCCE Brochure
    Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement Business Law in the Public Interest Leslie Caldwell, Maria T. Vullo ’87, Assistant Attorney General, Brian A. Benczkowski, Assistant Superintendent, Criminal Division, Geoffrey S. Berman, U.S. Attorney, Attorney General, Criminal Division, NY Department of U.S. Department of Justice Southern District of New York U.S. Department of Justice Financial Services Jay Clayton, Deputy Attorney General Deputy Attorney General Chair, U.S. Securities Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein Sally Quillian Yates and Exchange Commission Eric Holder Mark Steward, Jeh Charles Johnson, Director of Enforcement Preet Bharara, Partner, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, and Market Oversight, U.S. Attorney, Makan Delrahim, Assistant Attorney Wharton & Garrison; former Financial Conduct Southern District General, Antitrust Division, Secretary, U.S. Department Authority, U.K. of New York U.S. Department of Justice of Homeland Security John Demers, Assistant Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Mary Jo White, Chair, U.S. Lisa Osofsky, Attorney General, Civil Division, National Security Division, Securities and Exchange Director, Serious U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice Commission Fraud Office, U.K. IV History and Mission The Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement (PCCE) at NYU School of Law is a law and policy program created to promote effective enforcement and compliance. Each year PCCE hosts conferences and forums, bringing together some of the most prominent aca- demics, lawyers, and judges in the world for in-depth discussions about how to structure enforcement policy and compliance to effectively deter corporate misconduct. By gathering experts with diverse experi- ence and viewpoints, we undertake the collaborative process of understanding and deterring corporate misconduct; building efficient, effective, and sustain- able compliance programs; and establishing a fair and just process in accomplishing these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies
    August 4, 2021 VIA E-MAIL Joon H. Kim Anne L. Clark Special Deputies to the First Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 112224-0341 Re: Response to Special Investigators’ Report Dear Counsel: As outside counsel to the Executive Chamber, we write to express our client’s deep concerns about the fairness of your investigation, and the lack of neutrality and impartiality with which it was conducted and concluded. First, it is very disappointing that you refused to provide the subjects of the investigation, many of whom are current and former Chamber officers and employees, with an opportunity to review and respond to your findings before they became public today.1 Unlike civil litigation or criminal prosecutions, where an investigation is followed by the opportunity for a trial or a hearing, your report is the end of the line. There will be no formal setting in which those whose conduct the report discusses will have a meaningful opportunity to challenge, rebut, or even raise questions about the investigators’ accuracy, their credibility determinations, or their thoroughness. That lack of process explains why it has now become commonplace in circumstances like these for agencies such as the New York Inspector General,2 the U.S. Department of Justice’s 1 We also note that you did not even alert us that you were releasing your report today. 2 See, e.g., State of New York Offs. of the Inspector Gen., Investigation of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Political Subdivision Program at 4 (Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • After Terror: Promoting Dialogue Among Civilizations
    Per27rev3 10.4.2007 8:34 Stránka 117 (Black plát) ▲ 117 138 REVIEWS Akbar Ahmed and Brian Forst: After Terror: Promoting Dialogue Among Civilizations London: Polity Press, 2005, 160 pages, ISBN: 10 0745635024. “...there is only one good, knowledge, and only one evil, ignorance...” (Socrates) “After Terror” is a compilation of 28 essays composed by the world’s prominent thinkers and activists, put together with the kind initiative of Akbar Ahmed and Brian Forst. Mr. Ahmed is a prominent Pakistani expert on Islamic studies and Mr. Forst is a Professor of Justice, Law and Society at the School of Public Affairs at Washington D.C. The book is a reaction to the events that were set in train by the 9/11 bombings and its goal is to convince its readers that terrorism is surmountable without having to open the Pandora’s box of clashing civilizations. The book is divided into three sections, the first, concerning “The Nature and the Source of the Problem”, the second, concerning “Pathways to dialogue” and finally the last section, “From Concern to Action”. The essays range from objective scholarly analysis to subjective argumentative reasoning. In sum, the book seeks to solve the most pressing problem of international terrorism so that one day we may indeed reach the point “after terror”. In the first essay of the first section called “The Nature and the Source of the Problem”, Zbigniew Brzezinski gives us his ideas concerning the problem at hand. Being a former National Security Adviser to the White House, Mr. Brzezinski gives his insights into the so-called “power of weakness”.1 Here he reflects on the changing nature of international relations where realist hard power is no longer in monopoly, since the game is no longer only played among rational-egoistic nation states.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Sampling from Massive Block Model Graphs with Personalized Pagerank∗
    Targeted sampling from massive block model graphs with personalized PageRank∗ Fan Chen1, Yini Zhang2, and Karl Rohe1 1Department of Statistics 2School of Journalism and Mass Communication University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA Abstract This paper provides statistical theory and intuition for Personalized PageRank (PPR), a popular technique that samples a small community from a massive network. We study a setting where the entire network is expensive to thoroughly obtain or maintain, but we can start from a seed node of interest and \crawl" the network to find other nodes through their connections. By crawling the graph in a designed way, the PPR vector can be approximated without querying the entire massive graph, making it an alternative to snowball sampling. Using the degree-corrected stochastic block model, we study whether the PPR vector can select nodes that belong to the same block as the seed node. We provide a simple and interpretable form for the PPR vector, highlighting its biases towards high degree nodes outside of the target block. We examine a simple adjustment based on node degrees and establish consistency results for PPR clustering that allows for directed graphs. These results are enabled by recent technical advances showing the element-wise convergence of eigenvectors. We illustrate the method with the massive Twitter friendship graph, which we crawl using the Twitter API. We find that (i) the adjusted and unadjusted PPR techniques are complementary approaches, where the adjustment makes the results particularly localized around the seed node and (ii) the bias adjustment greatly benefits from degree regularization. Keywords Community detection; Degree-corrected stochastic block model; Local clustering; Network sampling; Personalized PageRank arXiv:1910.12937v2 [cs.SI] 1 Jul 2020 1 Introduction Much of the literature on graph sampling has treated the entire graph, or all of the people in it, as the target population.
    [Show full text]
  • ACLU V. Clapper
    Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 33 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 52 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, 13 Civ. 3994 (WHP) Plaintiffs, ECF Case v. JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT STUART F. DELERY PREET BHARARA Assistant Attorney General United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York JOSEPH H. HUNT Director DAVID S. JONES TARA M. La MORTE ANTHONY J. COPPOLINO JOHN D. CLOPPER Deputy Director CHRISTOPHER HARWOOD Assistant United States Attorney s JAMES J. GILLIGAN 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor Special Litigation Counsel Tel. No. (212) 637-2739 (Jones) Fax No. (212) 637-2730 MARCIA BERMAN [email protected] Senior Trial Counsel [email protected] [email protected] BRYAN DEARINGER [email protected] Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Washington, D.C. Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 33 Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 52 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT……………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • "The Buck Stops Here": Barring Executives for Corporate Violations
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2012 Article 7 2012 Making Sure "The uckB Stops Here": Barring Executives for Corporate Violations Peter J. Henning Follow this and additional works at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Recommended Citation Henning, Peter J. (2012) "Making Sure "The uckB Stops Here": Barring Executives for Corporate Violations," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2012, Article 7. Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2012/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Making Sure "The Buck Stops Here": Barring Executives for Corporate Violations Peter J. Henringt When the sentence for a crime is not quickly carried out, the hearts of the people are filled with schemes to do wrong. Ecclesiastes 8:11 INTRODUCTION The movement called "Occupy Wall Street" has sought to take over locations in New York City and elsewhere to protest what it sees as corporate greed and corruption that have led to a growing inequality between powerful moneyed interests and "the other 99 percent." The protests in some ways harken back to the 1960s, with large numbers arrested amidst accusations of police brutality, although unlike earlier efforts to stop the Vietnam War, it is not clear what the protesters hope to accomplish be- yond voicing their objection to the status quo. A prominent target of their ire is bankers, with one protester quoted as saying, "I think a good deal of the bankers should be in jail"1-although no particular crime was identified.
    [Show full text]