DOCSLIB.ORG

Israeli Election Bulletin | March 19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Israeli Election Bulletin | March 19 BICOM's Poll of Polls Aggregate Polling March 4-19 Several parties such as Raam, Meretz, Religious Zionists and Blue and White all polling close to threshold Party size and where they stand on major issues Final messaging We are just four days away from the election and the parties have honed their nal messages. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu continues to frame the choice as between him and Yesh Atid leader Yair Lapid, deliberately downplaying the signicance of his rivals on the right. Netanyahu has continuously highlighted the success of the coronavirus vaccine procurement that he delivered and the subsequent ending of the lockdown, with nal restrictions conveniently being lifted today. Lapid’s campaign has shifted away from emphasising a ‘sane’, reasonable, and moderate leadership model to now siphoning o votes from the smaller centre-left parties in an eort to become the most realistic alternative to Netanyahu. Lapid's former partners in Blue and White are at most risk of losing out due to this shift. On the right, Yamina’s plan is to target Likud voters and promote Naftali Bennett’s economic plan. Similarly, New Hope's Gideon Saar is appealing to Likud supporters that want change but don’t trust Bennett not to join a Netanyahu-led government. 2/8 NEW from Fathom Journal Eight Israelis explain their vote: Fleur Hassan-Nahoum - Likud Emmanuel Navon - New Hope Shraga Alweiss - Yamina MK Oded Forer - Yisrael Beytenu Terry Newman - Yesh Atid Peter Lerner - Labour Ittay Flescher - Meretz Guli Dolev-Hashiloni - Joint List Israel Democracy Institute President Yohanan Plesner argues the ongoing political crisis shows that the system is broken and provides recommendations for strengthening Israel’s democracy. Read the full special here BICOM Director Richard Pater, joins Paul Alster of Reel Israel to oer expert insight into the forthcoming March 23 Israeli general election. Watch the video brieng There are three possible scenarios 1. Full-on right-wing government The biggest question remains, just like in the last three elections, but perhaps even more pronounced, can Netanyahu along with the religious, hard right and Yamina reach a 61-seat majority. According to our poll of polls, the Netanyahu bloc (even with the addition of Yamina) stands at 58. In the past, the polls have underestimated Likud support and so with an extra 3 they could reach their goal. Yediot Ahronot 16.03.21 The grati says Naftali (Bennett) loves Yair (Lapid) As Bennett arrives to clean it up, NetanyahuNetanyahu has pushed the narrative that Bennett will sit in a Lapid led government, a notion Bennett has tried his best to dispel 2. Anti-Netanyahu coalition This alternative government would be made up of a diverse group that has little in common ideologically, apart from their desire to remove Netanyahu from oce. Despite promises by Saar and Bennett not to sit in a Lapid-led government, can they converge alongside Avigdor Lieberman, Labour, Meretz and Blue and White (if they get over the threshold) and form a viable alternative? Can they agree on a candidate for prime minister, or will they propose another rotation agreement? Although Lapid, to his credit says he views the Arab parties as legitimate partners, it is dicult to reconcile them being part of the same coalition as the right-wing elements (Lieberman, Saar and Bennett) needed to make this option work. Yediot Ahronot 25.02.21 Lapid brings pizza to Saar and Bennett. Bennett says “we are socially isolating until March 23” Numbers wise, Lapid needs Bennett and Saar to join him in order to get to 61. Both right wingers however have vowed not to sit in a Lapid led coalition (partially in order to counter Netanyahu’s argument that its either Bibi or Lapid) 23.02.21 Haaretz Gideon Saar (right) is in the ring to ght Netanyahu, who prefers to attack Lapid. Netanyahu’s strategy is to try and ignore Saar and instead frame the elections as a straight choice between himself and Lapid (who many right wingers feel suspicious of) Israel Hayom 17.03.21 Benny Gantz is depicted as Forest Gump. Netanyahu calls out “Run Benny run!” As he chased by Lapid, Michaeli and Horowitz. Lapid has called on Gantz – who is polling near the electoral threshold – to pull out of the elections. Were Gantz to fall below it, tens of thousands of ‘anti Netanyahu’ votes would be wasted Yediot Ahronot 09.03.21 Title: The World of Culture Returns Meretz leader Nitzan Horowitz, “To be, or not to be…” as Tamar Zandberg, Yair Golan and Rinawie Zoabi, the next 3 on the party list look on. Meretz is polling close to the electoral threshold and is in danger of disappearing 3. A fth election later this year If the latter group fails to reconcile behind a single candidate or rotation, and the Netanyahu camp also do not have a working majority, there will be another stalemate. Netanyahu will continue to lead a transitional government. In this scenario it will be even more signicant if the Blue and White Party were to make it over the threshold. Were Benny Gantz to continue being an MK and no government is formed, theoretically the alternate prime minister deal agreed last year will kick in in November 2021. There remain several variables that make this election dicult to predict In the background of lingering concerns over coronavirus, how will this aect voter turnout? Will the apathy towards politics in general have a bearing on turnout? Are the Likud supporters energised enough to bring out the vote? Will the four smaller parties (Blue and White, Meretz, Raam and Religious Zionists) cross the threshold, and if not how will those ‘wasted’ votes alter the overall balance between the pro and anti-Netanyahu blocs? Maariv 11.03.21 Netanyahu says, “I’m leading you away from the coronavirus, like Moses did from Egypt” A weary citizen replies “It’s a shame we also received the plagues” Israel has been mainly successful in its vaccination program but has suered a large number of deaths for a relative young country and the equivalent of an ‘island state’ 23.02.21 Maariv Purim costumes that will guarantee social distancing: Sea urchin Flying saucer The planet Saturn Benny Gantz Election Podcasts Episode 139 | Will anyone beat Bibi? Featuring Yaakov Katz and Tal Shalev Episode 138 | What to expect in Israel's 4th election featuring Dahlia Scheindlin and Anshel Pfeer Episode 136 | Yamina's perspective on the upcoming election featuring Yamina candidate Jeremy Saltan Episode 135 | Israeli public opinion featuring Professor Tamar Hermann Episode 134 | A view of the elections from inside the Joint List featuring featuring MK Aida Touma-Suleiman Episode 133 | How the New Hope party views Israel’s election featuring MK Sharren Haskel Episode 132 | Yesh Atid’s perspective on Israel’s election featuring Yair Zivan Episode 130 | Israel enters another election cycle featuring Yaakov Katz Listen on Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts On 23 December 2020 the Knesset was automatically dissolved after the national unity government failed to pass a 2020 state budget. The election will be held on 23 March 2021. For more background on the collapse of the coalition, watch BICOM Director Richard Pater, read this BICOM Morning Brief, and our January 15 and February 12 Election Bulletins. View all of our election coverage here. Recommended Reading Down the rabbit hole of Israel’s electoral wonderland | Shalom Lipner, Atlantic Council Netanyahu’s Stump Speech Reveals Which Political Rival He Fears the Will Netanyahu’s vaccine success outweigh his rivals’ warnings about democracy? | David Horovitz, Times of Israel Jordan’s crown prince steps to the fore amid strained relations with Israel |Bruce Riedel, Brookings Institution What’s Missing in Israel’s Election? Biden. | Shmuel Rosner, New York Times Netanyahu versus Abu Yair | Abu Af Much, Ynet Israel's Likud Isn't the Party of Law and Order Anymore | Jonathan Spyer, Foreign Policy Israeli democracy is still not in danger| Jonathan S Tobin, Israel Hayom.
Recommended publications
  • Self-Described 'Franglo' Running for Likud List

    Self-Described 'Franglo' Running for Likud List

    Jpost | Print Article Page 1 of 2 August 25, 2012 Saturday 7 Elul 5772 23:25 IST Self-described ‘Franglo’ running for Likud list By GIL HOFFMAN 24/08/2012 Emmanuel Navon aims to represent French and English speaking immigrants in the Knesset. Photo by: Navon.com The only “Anglo” candidate for the Likud’s next Knesset slate may end up being a “Franglo.” In the 2009 election, no less than seven American-born candidates sought Knesset seats with Likud but either dropped out or failed to win realistic slots. This time around, the only announced candidate so far with connections to an English- speaking country is Emmanuel Navon, who was born and raised in Paris, but married a New Yorker, lives among American immigrants in Efrat, and hopes to represent both English and French speakers in the Knesset. “Just living in Efrat you get honorary American citizenship,” Navon joked in an interview at a popular Jerusalem waffle bar. “I attended a bilingual school, went to England every summer, and then lost my English accent in Israel thanks to my wife. I am not saying I can succeed where other [Anglo candidates] failed but there are a lot of votes if you combine the English and French speakers together. It’s time to leverage this political power.” Navon, who earned a doctorate in international relations from the Hebrew University following his aliya in 1993, directs the political science and communications department at Jerusalem Orthodox College and teaches at Tel Aviv University and the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya. After 12 years in academia, he decided to make his political expertise less theoretical.
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict

    Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict

    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
  • Download File

    Download File

    Columbia University Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Human Rights Studies Master of Arts Program Silencing “Breaking the Silence”: The Israeli government’s agenda respecting human rights NGOs activism since 2009 Ido Dembin Thesis Adviser: Prof. Yinon Cohen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 12 September, 2018 Abstract This research examines a key aspect in the deterioration of Israeli democracy between 2009-2018. Mainly, it looks at Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Right-wing governments utilization of legislative procedure to limit the right to free speech. The aspects of the right to free speech discussed here pertain to dissenting and critical activism against these government’s policies. The suppression of said right is manifested in the marginalization, delegitimization and ultimately silencing of its expression in Human Rights NGOs activism. To demonstrate this, the research presents a case study of one such NGO – “Breaking the Silence” – and the legal and political actions designed to cause its eventual ousting from mainstream Israeli discourse. The research focuses on the importance and uniqueness of this NGO, as well as the ways in which the government perceives and acts against it. First, it analyzes the NGO’s history, modus operandi and goals, emphasizing the uniqueness that makes it a particularly fascinating case. Then, it researches the government’s specific interest in crippling and limiting its influence. Finally, it highlights the government’s toolbox and utilization thereof against it. By shining a light on this case, the research seeks to show the process of watering down of a fundamental right within Israeli democracy – which is instrumental to understanding the state’s risk of decline towards illiberal democracy.
  • The 'Third Debate' Revisited

    The 'Third Debate' Revisited

    Review of International Studies (2001), 27, 611–625 Copyright © British International Studies Association The ‘third debate’ revisited EMMANUEL NAVON Abstract. This article challenges the idea that IR theory is in the midst of a ‘third debate’ between ‘positivistic’ and ‘post-positivistic’ approaches, by showing that neither the ‘first’ nor the ‘second’ debates have lost any of their relevance, and by arguing that the ‘third debate’ and the allegedly new paradigms it generated do not constitute a challenging innovation. While the ‘first debate’ is a debate between two visions of human nature, the ‘second debate’ is a debate between two visions of knowledge. A critical stance vis-à-vis rationalism does not imply a rejection of political realism, nor an endorsement of postmodernism or constructivism. What is absurdly called theory today is just a mask for fashion and greed. Camille Paglia1 The idea that IR theory is in the midst of a ‘third debate’ between positivistic and post-positivistic scholars has become a nearly unchallenged commonplace.2 According to the ‘third debate’ thesis, IR theory went through three successive stages: a debate between ‘idealism’ and ‘realism’ in the 1920s and 1930s, followed by a debate between ‘history’ and ‘science’ in the 1950s and 1960s, and finally replaced by a debate between ‘positivism’ and ‘post-positivism’ in the 1980s and 1990s.3 The ‘third debate’ generated an allegedly new paradigm (namely, constructivism) and students of International Relations are supposedly compelled to make their choice between ‘positivism’, ‘postmodernism’, and ‘constructivism’. The present article challenges the very relevance of the ‘third debate’ and ques- tions the novelty and validity of constructivism.
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A

    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A

    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
  • Compulsory Military Service As a Social Integrator

    Compulsory Military Service As a Social Integrator

    https://securityandefence.pl/ Compulsory military service as a social integrator Ronen Itsik [email protected] https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2452-9430 Adam Mickiewicz University, ul. Wieniawskiego 1, 61-712 Poznan, Poland Abstract Compulsory military service has become very rare over the last 30 years, in the western world. In the past, most countries con- sidered military service as a socialisation platform, given the fact that most of the population was recruited and military units were a "meeting point" for different cultures – because of that the service then was functional as a social integrator. The current research studied changes in social attitude during compulsory military service in Israel, where the society is considered to be es- sentially divided around ethnical and national issues. This study is based on an analysis of the attitudes of 3200 internet ques- tionnaire participants via social networks in Israel, followed by a U-test of the collected data. Half of the participants were high-school students (average age 17) and half of them discharged soldiers (average age 23). Analysis of the results reveals sig- nificant evidence: discharged soldiers tend to be more tolerant then high-school students with regard to other cultures and eth- nic origins. A discharged IDF soldier is less afraid of security threats and considers budget prioritisation towards social welfare to be more important than security challenges. These findings show that compulsory military service can still be effective as a so- cial integrator, even in the post-modern world where countries are dealing with migration issues and ethno-national tensions. Keywords: social integration, defence belief, security threat, post-modern army Article info Received: 30 April 2020 Revised: 20 June 2020 Accepted: 26 June 2020 Available online: 4 September 2020 DOI: http://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/124710 © 2020 R.
  • The International Status of Jerusalem by Emmanuel Navon Hartman

    The International Status of Jerusalem by Emmanuel Navon Hartman

    The International Status of Jerusalem By Emmanuel Navon Hartman Institute Delegation (Jerusalem), 26 June 2017 The legal status of Jerusalem was no different than the status of other towns and cities under Ottoman rule, and later under British rule. Jerusalem had a special meaning, and continues to have a special meaning to Jews, Muslims, and Christians. But its legal status was not an issue under Ottoman and under British rule. Although the status of Jerusalem under British rule was not a legal issue, there were already tensions between Jews and Muslims back then. The Jerusalem Mufti appointed by the British in 1921, Hadj Amin al-Husseini, violently opposed the Jews' attempts to turn the Western Wall into a de facto synagogue, with chairs, with Torah scrolls, and with a separation between men and women. This opposition turned into violence, with a pogrom against the Jewish population of Jerusalem, of Hebron, and of Safed. In 1931, the Mufti convened an international conference on Jerusalem, in which he accused the Jews of wanting to destroy the al-Aqsa mosque in order to rebuild their temple. The partition proposals of the Peel Commission (in 1937) and of the United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (1947) left Jerusalem outside of both the Jewish state and the Arab state. There were too many sensibilities involved to grant the sovereignty to either population. Demographically, there was a Jewish majority in Jerusalem since the mid-19th century, but Jerusalem is holy to the three monotheistic religions. The UN partition plan of 1947 proposed to make Jerusalem a separate entity, a corpus separatum under UN sovereignty.
  • Ethics of Modern War Tikvah Advanced Institutes Fall 2013

    Ethics of Modern War Tikvah Advanced Institutes Fall 2013

    THE TIKVAH FUND 165 E. 56th Street New York, New York 10022 Ethics of Modern War Tikvah Advanced Institutes Fall 2013 Tikvah Fellows (2013-14) Alan Goldsmith Alan Goldsmith is a national security professional with over six years of experience in foreign policy, Congress, policymaking, oversight, and communications. He served on the staff of the House Foreign Affairs Committee from 2007 to 2013, covering the Middle East and international organizations. Alan previously served as senior writer for Americans for a Strong Defense, a non- profit campaign opposing Chuck Hagel’s nomination for Secretary of Defense. Alan holds an M.A. in Strategic Security Studies from National Defense University and a B.A. in Political Science from Yeshiva University. He is a member of Young Professionals in Foreign Policy, and the Republican Jewish Coalition. Elana Stein Hain Elana Stein Hain has served as the Community Scholar at Lincoln Square Synagogue for the past five years, and she is a Ph.D. candidate in Religion at Columbia University. Elana is currently a faculty member at NYU Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service, where she teaches courses as part of a new minor on Religious Life and Leadership. Simone Hartmann Simone Dinah Hartmann was born and raised in Vienna, Austria and holds an M.Sc. in Information Technology and Politics from the Vienna University of Technology. She served in the Austrian student parliament where she became engaged against the Austrian far right and anti-Semitism. During the second intifada, she initiated pro-Israel events throughout German-speaking countries. In response to Iran’s nuclear program she started the European-wide coalition “Stop the Bomb,” and serves as its spokesperson and director in Austria.
  • "Time to Merge UNRWA with UNHCR" by Emmanuel Navon Knesset Lobby for UNRWA Reform, 12 March 2018 the Israeli-Palestini

    "Time to Merge UNRWA with UNHCR" by Emmanuel Navon Knesset Lobby for UNRWA Reform, 12 March 2018 the Israeli-Palestini

    "Time to Merge UNRWA with UNHCR" By Emmanuel Navon Knesset Lobby for UNRWA Reform, 12 March 2018 The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is so complex that it has defied, so far, the countless attempts to solve it. Many conflicts around the world are still unresolved -such as Northern Cyprus, Western Sahara, and Sri Lanka. And yet, the prevalent view on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict continues to be that all the core issues (Jerusalem, borders and refugees) must and can all be solved at once. Such was the approach of John Kerry's unsuccessful attempt to solve the conflict in 2014. Instead of this all-or-nothing approach, how about trying to untie some of the conflict's Gordian knots -even partially and progressively? The refugee issue and UNRWA are a good place to start. And as foreign diplomats serving in Israel, I believe that you have an important role to play by influencing your respective governments on this issue. The Palestinian leadership claims that there can be no peace with Israel without the so-called right of return. But if this "right of return" were to be applied as the Palestinians see it, there would be no Israel at all, because Israel would no longer be a nation-state. What the Palestinians mean by the "right of return" is that the descendants of the 1948 refugees, should be granted, even after three generations, the right to immigrate to pre-1967 Israel and to become Israeli citizens. Since, according to UNRWA, there are about 5 million Palestinian refugees today, Israel would no longer be a nation-state.
  • NAFTALI BENNETT INAUGURATION SPEECH at the Knesset in Jerusalem, Israel by Luis B

    NAFTALI BENNETT INAUGURATION SPEECH at the Knesset in Jerusalem, Israel by Luis B

    NAFTALI BENNETT INAUGURATION SPEECH At the Knesset in Jerusalem, Israel by Luis B. Vega [email protected] www.PostScritpts.org ‘When Sanballat, Tobiah, Geshem the Arab, and the rest of our Enemies heard that I had rebuilt the Wall and not a gap was left, though to that time I had not yet installed the Doors in the Gates, Sanballat and Geshem sent me this message: Come, let us meet together in one of the villages on the plain of Ono. But they were planning to harm me.’ -Nehemiah 6:1-2 The purpose of this study is to 1st provide the official released Inauguration Speech of Israel’s new Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett. The 2nd purposed is to analyze key prophetic inferences related to the Last Days that are pertinent from the speech in light of a Christian perspective and interpretation of world event and Israel’s coming 70th Week for Years. It is very interesting how when such national events occur and the occasion is for a Transition of Government, for example, that such People invoke the Name of GOD, in this case, the GOD of Israel, YHVH. Bennett ended his speech with a prayer to ‘Our Heavenly Father, the Rock and Redeemer of Israel’. It is very interesting as it echoes the Triune Nature of YHVH being, Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. If one knows and has read the Gospel accounts of Jesus, it is striking how at the account of the Resurrection of Jesus, Mary Magdalene sought to locate the body of Jesus. Why? She came to the Garden Tomb and found that the Stone that had sealed the Tomb was rolled away.
  • The Lesson of the Holocaust

    The Lesson of the Holocaust

    The lesson of the Holocaust Today Israel commemorates the Holocaust. Since yesterday, Israeli social media has been filled with attacks, as, on the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day, President Reuven Rivlin and IDF deputy chief of Staff, Yair Golan each in his own way called on Israelis to do some serious soul searching. The public unfortunately has gotten used to seeing Rivlin in the line of fire. But public and social media attacks on Golan were so outrageous that Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon (Likud) said they were part of a broader populist campaign against the IDF. The main criticism of Golan was that his comparison of present-day Israel and 1930s Germany is unacceptable. Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked (Jewish Home) said his remarks “attest mainly to a lack of understanding, ignorance, and a cheapening of the Holocaust. On such a day, I wouldn’t even want to quote what he said.” Her party chair, Education Minister Naftali Bennett said “God forbid, our troops are likened to Nazis, with a kosher stamp from on high.” Avi Dabush (Meretz) responded in a powerful post drawing from theJewish tradition. Dabush referred back to the most famous phrase in the Passover Hagada, “In every generation, each person must regard himself or herself as if he or she had come out of Egypt.” He writes, “In every generation, each person must not compare?” The mighty ocean of Judaism provides me with many moral compasses… How does Judaism handle a trauma? Whether it is the Egyptian enslavement, or the destruction of the First and Second Temples? Jewish tradition always tries to learn lessons from traumas.
  • THE STATE of ISRAEL 70 YEARS of INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation

    THE STATE of ISRAEL 70 YEARS of INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation

    1 The Zionist General Council Session XXXVII/4 THE STATE OF ISRAEL 70 YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE - Building a Nation October 2018 2 Plenary No. 1 - Opening of the Zionist General Council Session Eli Cohen opened the first session and thanked the members of the audit committee and praised the auditor and his team, who - in their attempt to reach a level of satisfaction, which all can find to be acceptable - see all the flaws and improvements. Rabbi Yehiel Wasserman was invited to the stage for a ceremony conferring honorary fellowships to various members for their activities in the Zionist movement and their significant contribution to shaping its path and activities. This year, thanks to the WZO’s extensive activity over the past decade, quite a few people will be receiving this status. Honorary fellows are highly motivated individuals who have devoted many years of their time to the Zionist movement and who are role models for the next generation. Rabbi Wasserman then thanked the members of the Committee for Honorary Fellows: Barbara Goldstein, Silvio Joskowicz, Dalia Levy, Karma Cohen, Hernan Felman, Jacques Kupfer and Nava Avissar, the committee’s coordinator, for their dedicated work. Honorary Fellows: Mrs. Ana Marlene Starec – Mrs. Starec has been active in the Zionist movement for the past 54 years. She has been serving as Honorary President of WIZO for many years now and is also engaged in advocacy activities for Israel in the Diaspora in general, and with the Jewish communities of Brazil, in particular. Her human rights activities earned her a medal from the state of Rio de Janeiro, and she has also received a medal from the French Senate for her activities for humanity.