DOCSLIB.ORG

GREATER MANCHESTER and CHESHIRE EAST a Science And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GREATER MANCHESTER AND CHESHIRE EAST A Science and Innovation Audit Report sponsored by the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy 1 Contents Foreword 2 Executive summary 3 1 Introduction to Greater Manchester and Cheshire East 7 1.1 Audit process 8 1.2 Overall economic performance and connectivity 9 2 Regional science and innovation assets 11 2.1 Science and research assets 12 2.2 Science and innovation talent 16 3 Excellence in science and research 17 4 Innovation 18 5 National and international engagement 25 6 International developments in science and technology 27 7 Conclusions 31 Annex A Consortium structure and members 34 Annex B Core Data 35 Annex C The University of Manchester on Corridor Manchester 36 Annex D Table showing the potential for inter-connectedness between strengths 37 Annex E Glossary 39 Annex F Abbreviations 40 Annex G Bibliography 41 Annex H Pankhurst Institute 42 2 Foreword Connectivity put our region at the heart This Science and Innovation Audit, in of the Industrial Revolution, when one partnership with central government, particular innovation, the canal network, is an important step in helping us revolutionised the textiles industry. Today appreciate the strengths within Greater our industries may look a lot different, but Manchester and Cheshire East. From the one thing remains the same: the better perspective of business it helps us to our connections, the better our chance achieve a critical aim in ensuring that of a healthier, more successful economy excellence in science is aligned as and society. effectively as possible with opportunities for companies to innovate successfully. Greater Manchester and Cheshire East are home to a high level of partners hip This Audit has focused on identified and connectivity, not least in the areas of specialisms around health innovation, core strength: health innovation and advanced materials, energy, digital and advanced materials. We also have fast- industrial biotechnology, and identified a growth opportunities in digital, energy and number of nationally important science industrial biotechnology, with a wide range and research assets. It has also of science and innovation assets across demonstrated that innovation depends all five areas. not just on physical assets but on people, talent, skills, and infrastructure. It Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, Building on the interconnectivity between positions existing companies and FRS, FMedSci these is at the crux of the vision set out in potential inward investors to capitalise on President and Vice-Chancellor this SIA. Synergies will accelerate the flow a dynamic and highly trained workfor,ce of The University of Manchester of scientific innovation to the market, including a nationally significant boost productivity and potentially develop concentration in clinical healthcare, solutions to national and global challenges. a digital and technology cluster, one of largest graduate pools in Europe, While acknowledging the demonstrable and a concentration of STEM graduates scientific excellence, dynamic workforce and postgraduates. and business support environment of the region, as well our physical infrastructure Partnership working is underlined by and progressive governance, the SIA also strong governance arrangements. shows us a number of ways forward in Greater Manchester was the UK’s first order to raise skill levels, drive innovative Combined Authority, and has agreed a activity and more closely align industry number of important devolution deals and science. These will require strategic with central government, most recently investment in future and existing assets, on health and social care. This is but also in developing, attracting and underpinned by a strong public and retaining talent, and in support for new private business support environment, and growing businesses. including a Business Growth Hub, Manufacturing Champions Network, Juergen Maier The UK government has begun to four Enterprise Zones, and growing Chief Executive of Siemens plc demonstrate its support for a better incubator space, as well as strong connected north through the Northern physical infrastructure, including Powerhouse initiative. It has also Manchester Airport. recognised the strengths of our infrastructu re via the devolution of This Audit provides a platform for powers and budgets in Greater ongoing engagement, so that we Manchester. This SIA shows a path which ensure that we support the innovation the government and our authorities can eco-system and extract maximum value take to fully harness the potential within from existing assets, as well as continuing Greater Manchester and Cheshire East to to invest to maintain world-class bring benefits that spread through – and excellence and stay at the forefront of beyond – our region. international scientific development. Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, FRS, Juergen Maier FMedSci Chief Executive of Siemens plc President and Vice-Chancellor of The University of Manchester 3 Executive summary In autumn 2015 the UK government announced regional Science and Innovation Audits (SIAs) to catalyse a new approach to regional economic development. SIAs enable local consortia to focus on analysing regional strengths and identify mechanisms to realise their potential. In Greater Manchester (GM) and Cheshire East (CE), a consortium was formed to focus on our strengths in health innovation, advanced materials, energy, digital and industrial biotechnology. This report presents the results which includes broad-ranging analysis of GM and CE’s capabilities, the challenges and the substantial opportunities for future economic growth. Context 2. ‘Fast-growth opportunities’ focused on At the core of the industrial strategy for the future potential of digital, energy, and both GM and CE is the need to harness industrial biotechnology, where our knowledge, innovation, skills and assets and capabilities offer real scope for infrastructure to drive the local economy, future development. create jobs and raise productivity. Realisation of the full potential from our Our guiding hypotheses were firstly that science and innovation strengths will also we have five areas of core strengths and benefit wider global societal challenges. fast growth opportunities which could be These include climate change, energy combined to release new synergies of security, transport efficiency, and a innovation and productivity growth, and sustainable health and social care system. secondly that we would have to address Informed by the results of our Smart gaps in our regional innovation ecosystem Specialisation Platform analysis, emerging that are constraining our ability to do so in imperatives for growing the economy of order to realise full potential. GM and CE’s the Northern Powerhouse and devolution collaboration on this Audit is borne out of of the health and social care budget to shared ambition, functional geography, GM, we identified two ‘areas’ of focus for talent and assets, and a strong history of this Science and Innovation Audit (SIA): working together in partnership, such as joint action to secure a future for Alderley 1. ‘Core strengths’ in health innovation Park1 (home to 150 bioscience and advanced materials, where we have companies), and the £31m Joint Cheshire existing, internationally- recognised and GM Life Science Fund2. excellence. 1https://moderngov.cheshireeast.gov.uk/documents/s31312/Alderley%20Park%20Development%20Prospec tus%20-%20Appendix%201.pdf 2http://www.gmclifesciencesfund.com/ 4 Vision Particularly important is the Advanced materials: eg Sir Henry Royce Our vision derives directly from our first accompanying training programme. Institute, National Graphene Institute, hypothesis that we can create a global Graphene Engineering Innovation Centre, competitive advantage by driving This gives us a large concentration of BP International Centre for Advanced synergies from our core capabilities. Our graphene scientists with additional MateriaM)ls (BP-ICA 13, Cockcroft areas of excellence create additional entrepreneurship training. The Sir Henry Institute. positive spill-overs and value when Royce Institute8 will create a national combined. This inter-connectedness will focus to overcome traditionally long lead- Digital: eg recognised as the UK’s second enable us to co-develop applications in times and act as a “rapid accelerator” digital hub through MediaCityUK, Farr new technologies. It will be achieved by through TRLs to application, notably in Institute, CityVerve, Jodrell Bank, Hartree linking our unique clusters of excellence in the manufacturing sector. Centre (Sci-Tech Daresbury), and fundamental science with an ability to put associated tech cluster14. that scientific knowledge into application iii. GM as a full-scale test-bed and lead – bringing together local and national market to develop and demonstrate Energy: eg National Nuclear Laboratory, partners. Three key opportunities innovative technology Dalton Nuclear Institute, National Grid identified are: Our fast-growth opportunities, digital and High Voltage Laboratory, Birchwood energy, as with health, combine excellence nuclear cluster, Amec Foster Wheeler’s i. Health – a globally leading centre for in research and facilities with a particular High Temperature Facility. clinical trials competence in mounting large-scale We have the largest concentration of projects in the community. This is illustrated Indust rial biotechnology: eg Manchester excellence in health research nationally by the large-scale demonstrators, Institute of Biotechnology,
Recommended publications
  • Innovation Districts

    Innovation Districts

    THE RISE OF INNOVATION DISTRICTS: A New Geography Of Innovation In America Bruce Katz and Julie Wagner S THE UNITED STATES SLOWLY EMERGES FROM THE GREAT RECES- SION, A REMARKABLE SHIFT IS OCCURRING IN THE SPATIAL GEOG- ARAPHY OF INNOVATION. FOR THE PAST 50 YEARS, THE LANDSCAPE OF INNOVATION HAS BEEN DOMINATED BY PLACES LIKE SILICON VALLEY—SUBURBAN CORRIDORS OF SPATIALLY ISOLATED CORPORATE CAMPUSES, ACCESSIBLE ONLY BY CAR, WITH LITTLE EMPHASIS ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE OR ON INTEGRATING WORK, HOUSING AND RECREATION. A new complementary urban model is now emerging, giving rise to what we and others are calling “innovation districts.” These dis- tricts, by our definition, are geographic areas where leading-edge anchor institutions and companies cluster and connect with start- ups, business incubators and accelerators.1 They are also physically compact, transit-accessible, and technically-wired and offer mixed- use housing, office, and retail. Innovation districts are the manifestation of mega-trends altering the location preferences of people and firms and, in the process, re-conceiving the very link between economy shaping, place mak- ing and social networking.2 Our most creative institutions, firms and workers crave proximity so that ideas and knowledge can be transferred more quickly and seamlessly. Our “open innovation” economy rewards collaboration, transforming how buildings and entire districts are designed and spatially arrayed. Our diverse population demands more and better choices of where to live, work and play, fueling demand for more walkable neighborhoods where housing, jobs and amenities intermix. — Cover: The geography of Bar- celona’s innovation dis- Led by an eclectic group of institutions and leaders, innovation trict, highlighted in blue, districts are emerging in dozens of cities and metropolitan areas in is located in the heart of the United States and abroad and already reflect distinctive ty- the city.
  • From Science Parks to Innovation Districts

    From Science Parks to Innovation Districts

    From Science Parks to Innovation Districts Research Facility Development in Legacy Cities on the Northeast Corridor Working Paper 2015/008 August 2015 Eugenie L. Birch Lawrence C. Nussdorf Professor of Urban Research Department of City and Regional Planning School of Design Co-Director, Penn Institute for Urban Research University of Pennsylvania Contact Information: [email protected] Understanding our cities…. Understanding our world From Science Parks to Innovation Districts 2 Introduction Research and development (R&D) drives advanced economies worldwide. It is this that provides the foundation for the new knowledge, products, and processes that, in turn, become new industries, create jobs and serve as the source of economic growth. Key areas for R&D are in what is called the knowledge and technology industries (KTI) that consist of high technology manufacturing (e.g. aircraft, spacecraft, pharmaceuticals) and knowledge-intensive services (commercial business, financial and communication services). KTI, which account f or 27% of the worldwide Gross Domestic Product (GDP), are extremely important to the United States, in particular, representing 40% of the U.S. GDP. In fact, the U.S is the world’s largest KTI producer – contributing 27% of the total HT manufacturing and 32% of the KI services.1 In order to grow and maintain these positions, the United States, like its peers in Europe and Asia who are also large contributors, has built an extensive R&D infrastructure composed of three strong players: the private sector, the public sector and universities. In terms of expenditures and numbers of employees, the private sector dominates the R&D enterprise, but the university sector, largely funded by the US government, is also an important component both directly and indirectly.
  • Borough Profile 2020 Warrington

    Borough Profile 2020 Warrington

    Borough profile 2020 Warrington 6 4 3 117 122 118 115 9 5 19 120 7 Warrington Wards 2 13 1 1. Appleton 12. Latchford West 110 11 12 2. Bewsey & Whitecross 13. Lymm North & Thelwall 1 14 3. Birchwood 14. Lymm South 4. Burtonwood & Winwick 15. Orford 116 21 5. Chapelford & Old Hall 16. Penketh & Cuerdley 8 6. Culcheth, Glazebury & Croft 17. Poplars & Hulme 7. Fairfield & Howley 18. Poulton North 8. Grappenhall 19. Poulton South 1 9. Great Sankey North & Whittle Hall 20. Rixton & Woolston 10. Great Sankey South 21. Stockton Heath 11. Latchford East 22. Westbrook Produced by Business Intelligence Service Back to top Contents 1. Population of Warrington 2. Deprivation 3. Education - Free School Meals (FSM) 4. Education - Special Educational Needs (SEN) 5. Education - Black Minority Ethnic (BME) 6. Education - English as an Additional Language (EAL) 7. Education - (Early Years aged 4/5) - Early Years Foundation Stage: Good Level of Development (GLD) 8. Education - (End of primary school aged 10/11) – Key Stage 2: Reading, Writing and Maths 9. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Progress 8 10. Education (end of secondary school aged 15/16) – Key Stage 4: Attainment 8 11. Health - Life expectancy 12. Health - Low Birthweight 13. Health - Smoking at time of delivery 14. Health - Overweight and obese reception children 15. Health - Overweight and obese Year 6 children 16. Children’s Social Care – Children in Need 17. Adult Social Care – Request for Support from new clients 18. Adult Social Care – Sequel to the Requests for Support 19. Adult Social Care – Number of clients accessing Long Term Support 20.
  • Property Maintenance Code

    Property Maintenance Code

    Property Maintenance Code City of York, Pennsylvania UPDATED OCTOBER 2015 C. Kim Bracey, Mayor Property Maintenance Code of the City of York, Pennsylvania As adopted by the Council of the City of York, Pennsylvania Session 2000 COPYRIGHT © 1998 BY INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. All rights reserved. Chapters 1 through 8, inclusive, of the Property Maintenance Code of the City of York designate and incorporate portions of the ICC International Property Maintenance Code, 1998 edition, a copyrighted work owned by the INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL, INC. Without advance written permission from the copyright owner, no part of this book may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including, without limitation, electronic, optical, or mechanical means (by way of example, and not limitation, photocopying, or recording by or in an information storage and retrieval system). The CITY OF YORK edition of this copyrighted work is by arrangement with BOCA International, Inc. For information on permission to copy material exceeding fair use, please contact: Chief Executive Officer, BOCA International, Inc., 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, Illinois 60478, (708) 799-2300. AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS COPYRIGHT © 2000 BY THE CITY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA All rights reserved. No amendments or additions made by the City of York, Pennsylvania to the ICC International Property Maintenance Code, 1998 edition, as reproduced in this book, may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by an information storage and retrieval system without advance permission in writing from the City of York, Pennsylvania. For information, address: City of York, Bureau of Permits, Planning and Zoning, 101 South George Street, P.O.
  • INNOVATION DISTRICT City of Greensboro Strong Cities, Strong Communities Challenge Economic Development Plan Submitted by the Mass Economics Team 6

    INNOVATION DISTRICT City of Greensboro Strong Cities, Strong Communities Challenge Economic Development Plan Submitted by the Mass Economics Team 6

    GREENSBORO GLOBAL INNOVATION DISTRICT City of Greensboro Strong Cities, Strong Communities Challenge Economic Development Plan Submitted by the Mass Economics team 6 . 01 . 2015 INTRODUCTION Greensboro is a paradox. In the late 1960s, — has already taken root. In the past decade, Greensboro is a paradox. Greensboro’s per capita income — the standard Greensboro has seen significant investment in metric for economic well-being — made it the hotels, cultural amenities, and restaurants, and wealthiest of the large metropolitan areas in is awaiting the 2017 opening of a $65 million the state of North Carolina. As late as 2000, dollar performing arts center.2 However, these the region ranked in the top one-third of U.S. investments alone will not return the city to its metropolitan areas in per capita income. Since prosperous past. Returning to prosperity will 2000, however, the City of Greensboro and the require development of 21st century economic larger region have suffered from job loss, slow specializations, significant growth in new income growth, and large spikes in resident firms and jobs, and better wages than the local poverty: the number of jobs in the region has economy currently generates. actually declined (-3%), while growing in North Carolina (+6%) and the U.S. (+5%); the After a year of research and analysis, weeks of region’s per capita income has grown more site visits, and interviews with almost 50 local slowly than 93% of U.S. regions; and poverty experts and stakeholders, the Mass Economics among city residents has increased 80%. Over team believes that the root cause of Greensboro’s the last fifteen years, few regions in the United economic decline lies in its underdeveloped local States have suffered as much economically as innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem, which Greensboro.1 is blocking the full utilization of substantial local economic assets.
  • Innovation Districts

    Innovation Districts

    1 WELCOME TO POMPANO BEACH 2 FLORIDA’S WARMEST WELCOME 3 LOCATION 01 CENTRALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY PALM BEACH POMPANO BEACH MIAMI Centrally located between Palm Beach and Miami, Pompano Beach is often called "the Heart of the Gold Coast”. A MAJOR TRANSFORMATION 4 Trend-setting cities around the globe are creating Innovation Districts transforming underutilized swaths of land into dynamic areas full of corporate sophistication, startup edginess, walkable communities, trendy restaurants, hip housing and cultural clusters. Successful in cities from Barcelona to Boston, the trend is now emerging in smaller communities. However, this model is one that the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) has long embraced. And now, thanks to the joint efforts of the City and the CRA, Pompano Beach is becoming a hot spot for current and new residents alike to live, work and play. For years, innovation occurred in sprawling corporate campuses that were isolated from one another. But now innovation emerges from a mash-up of ideologies where people can co-invent, co-produce and stay connected to all of the dynamic energy located in close proximity. Designed by concentrating daytime and nighttime economic uses with a dense residential component, these districts foster heightened interaction and collaboration. 5 DEMOGRAPHICS & FACTS POMPANO BEACH OFFERS 6 Proximity to Interstate-95, Tri-Rail, FEC Corridor, three international airports, and two major seaports More than 30 million sq/ft of industrial/storage/distribution space Center of the “Internet
  • Town of York Home Rule Charter

    Town of York Home Rule Charter

    TOWN OF YORK HOME RULE CHARTER Adopted November 5, 1991 Amended November 7, 1995 Amended November 4, 1997 Amended November 2, 1999 Amended November 6, 2001 Amended November 4, 2003 Amended November 8, 2005 Amended May 20, 2006 Amended November 7, 2006 Amended May 18, 2013 Amended July 14, 2020 York Home Rule Charter INDEX TOWN OF YORK HOME RULE CHARTER Page ARTICLE 1: GRANTS OF POWERS TO THE TOWN...................... 1 Section 1: Incorporation........................................................................... 1 Section 2: Form of Government.............................................................. 1 Section 3: Construction............................................................................ 1 Section 4: Intergovernmental Relations.................................................. 1 Section 5: Short Title................................................................................. 1 ARTICLE II. TOWN MEETINGS......................................................... 2 Section 1: The Legislative Body.............................................................. 2 Section 2: Town Meeting Referenda Elections....................................... 2 Section 3: Fiscal Year................................................................................ 3 Section 4: Budget Committee................................................................. 3 Section 5: Submission of School Budget and Message.......................... 4 Section 6: Submission of Municipal Budget and Message................... 4 Section 7: Municipal
  • East Coast Modern a Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games

    East Coast Modern a Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games

    www.creativerail.co.uk East Coast Modern A Route for Train Simulator – Dovetail Games Contents A Brief History of the Route Route Requirements Scenarios Belmont Yard – York Freight Doncaster – Newark Freight Grantham – Doncaster Non-Stop Hexthorpe – Marshgate Freight Newark – Doncaster Works Peterborough – Tallington Freight Peterborough – York Non-Stop Selby – York York – Doncaster Works Operating Notices Acknowledgements © Copyright CreativeRail. All rights reserved. 2018. www.creativerail.co.uk A Brief History of the Route The first incarnation of the East Coast Main Line dates back to 1850 when London to Edinburgh services became possible on the completion of a permanent bridge over the River Tweed. However, the route was anything but direct, would have taken many, many hours and would have been exhausting. By 1852, the Great Northern Railway had completed the 'Towns Line' between Werrington (Peterborough) and Retford, which saw journey times between York and London of five hours. Edinburgh to London was a daunting eleven. Over time, the route has endured harsh periods, not helped by two world wars. It only benefited from very little improvement. Nevertheless, journey times did shrink. Names and companies synonymous with the route, such as, LNER and Gresley have secured their place in history, along with the most famous service - 'The Flying Scotsman'. Motive power also developed with an ever increasing calibre including A3s, A4s Class 55s and HSTs that have powered expresses through the decades. The introduction of HST services in 1978 saw the Flying Scotsman reach Edinburgh in only five hours. A combination of remodelling, track improvements and full electrification has seen a further reduction to what it is today, which sees the Scotsman complete the 393 miles in under four and a half hours in the capable hands of Class 91 and Mk4 IC225 formations.
  • Minerals and Waste Core Strategy

    Minerals and Waste Core Strategy

    Tees Valley Joint Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents In association with Core Strategy DPD Adopted September 2011 27333-r22.indd 1 08/11/2010 14:55:36 i ii Foreword The Tees Valley Minerals and Waste Development Plan Documents (DPDs) - prepared jointly by the boroughs of Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough, Redcar and Cleveland and Stockton-on-Tees - bring together the planning issues which arise from these two subjects within the sub-region. Two DPDs have been prepared. This Minerals and Waste Core Strategy contains the long-term spatial vision and the strategic policies needed to achieve the key objectives for minerals and waste developments in the Tees Valley. The separate Policies and Sites DPD, which conforms with it, identifies specific sites for minerals and waste development and sets out policies which will be used to assess minerals and waste planning applications. The DPDs form part of the local development framework and development plan for each Borough. They cover all of the five Boroughs except for the part within Redcar and Cleveland that lies within the North York Moors National Park. (Minerals and waste policies for that area are included in the national park’s own local development framework.) The DPDs were prepared during a lengthy process of consultation. This allowed anyone with an interest in minerals and waste in the Tees Valley the opportunity to be involved. An Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State carried out an Examination into the DPDs in early 2011. He concluded that they had been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and were sound.
  • UKBJJA 1St University League University of Nottingham No-Gi Categories

    UKBJJA 1St University League University of Nottingham No-Gi Categories

    UKBJJA 1st University League University of Nottingham No-Gi Categories Beginner / Male / u69 Daron Coaker Edge Hill University William Chase Brennand University of Nottingham Samuel Mitchell University of Warwick Christopher Lϋbker University of York David Crockford Nottingham Trent University Liam Ashley Padfield University of Birmingham Zach Sheridan University College London Milo Diebel University of York Valter Gubeladze University of Nottingham Samuel Forsythe King's College London Total: 10 Beginner / Male / u77 Mark Dawson University of Nottingham Nick Charnley University of York Chris Beattie University of Oxford Felix Major University of Nottingham Hamza Javed University of Bristol Jack McCann University of Warwick Max Joshua University College London Dahlin Mony University College London Dan Hobbins University College London Vibesan Illsmpooranan University of Nottingham Sim Henderson University of Nottingham Charlie Adorian University of Nottingham Idris Mhiri University of York Sutthikun Ratsirivattanakul Nottingham Trent University Total: 14 Beginner / Male / u85 Jacob Watkinson University of Warwick Daniel Dimmock Nottingham Trent University Dominic Amlot University of York James Keenan University of Birmingham Frank Chen University of Warwick Liam Jackson Walsh University of Liverpool Daneil Timbrell University College London Jakub Sliwinski University of Oxford Levi Francis University of Hull Total: 8 Beginner / Male / u94 Tom Bradford University of Worcester Juan Gaviria Duenas Loughborough University Ben Carter University
  • The Fremont Innovation Ecosystem Laboratory

    The Fremont Innovation Ecosystem Laboratory

    THE FREMONT INNOVATION ECOSYSTEM LABORATORY Building a new future for the City of Fremont THE LUTTRELL COLLECTIVE Innovation districts constitute the ultimate mash-up of entrepreneurs and educational institutions, startups and schools, mixed-use development and medical innovations, bike-sharing and bankable investments—all connected by transit, powered by clean energy, wired for digital technology, and fueled by caffeine. - Bruce Katz and Julie Wagner The Rise of Innovation Districts Brookings Institution Click here to view EcoLab video 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A city that thinks like a startup GLOBAL INNOVATION EMERGES The City of Fremont engaged The Luttrell Collective to help guide and accelerate the city’s pathway to building a culture of innovation in the Warm Springs Innovation District. Leveraging Fremont’s business community as well as their own professional network, The Luttrell Collective assembled a diverse group of Bay Area participants to engage in a grand experiment—an Ecosystem Laboratory—to design and envision the future of Fremont’s emerging Innovation District. With a greenfield of promise for new public-private partnerships inspiring economic growth in the Bay Area in advanced manufacturing, clean technologies, biomedical and education, the City of Fremont is positioned to lead as a global innovation cluster. THE GRAND EXPERIMENT The Ecosystem Laboratory (EcoLab) brought together leaders from the community with the common interest in designing the next Silicon Valley by generating new thinking and practical, actionable next steps. Attendees included leaders, thinkers and doers across several industry sectors including: healthcare, retail, government, land developers, clean technology, education, biomedical device, advanced technology, entrepreneurs, social innovators and others from the emerging Fremont ecosystem.
  • 1 Codified Ordinances of York Part Seven

    1 Codified Ordinances of York Part Seven

    1 CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF YORK PART SEVEN - GENERAL OFFENSES CODE ________________________ Art. 705. Keeping of Animals. Art. 709. Civil Emergencies. Art. 713. Disorderly Conduct and Disturbing the Peace. Art. 714. Noise. Art. 715. Unlicensed Sale of Alcoholic Beverages. Art. 716. Real Estate Used For Illicit Drug Sales. Art. 717. Dogs. Art. 725. Firearms and Weapons. Art. 729. Litter and Weeds. Art. 733. Air Rifles and Sling Shots. Art. 737. Minors Curfew. (Amended Bill 13, Ord. 11-08) Art. 741. Park Conduct. (Amended Bill 24, Ord. 22-08) Art. 745. Pigeons. Art. 753. Streets and Sidewalks. Art. 755. Police and Fire Alarms. 3 CODIFIED ORDINANCES OF YORK PART SEVEN - GENERAL OFFENSES CODE ARTICLE 705 Keeping of Animals 705.01 Purpose; greater standards to prevail. permit standards. 705.02 Definitions; word usage. Permit fees. 705.03 Kinds of animals permitted. Immunization. 705.04 Keeping of animals regulated. Diseased animals. 705.05 Household pets. Inciting animals to fight. 705.06 Limitations on number of Cruelty to animals. animals. Violations and penalties. 705.07 Enforcement of provisions. 705.08 Application for permit to exceed number of permitted animals. CROSS REFERENCES Animals at large - see 3rd Class §2403(8) (53 P.S. §37403(8)) Power to regulate animals - see 3rd Class §2403 (8), (9) (53 P.S. §37403(8), (9)) Dogs - see GEN. OFF. Art. 717 705.01 PURPOSE; GREATER STANDARDS TO PREVAIL. (a) This article is enacted to regulate the maintenance, keeping or possession of animals within the City of York, Pennsylvania, in order to promote the health, safety and general welfare of its inhabitants.